Sex Work Criminalization Essay
Sex Work Criminalization Essay
Introduction
The article authored by Ine Vanwesenbeeck titled Sex Work Criminalization Is Barking Up the Wrong Tree and published in June 2017 is one of the most relevant sources to the research project on the need for the US to decriminalize prostitution. The article was initially published on the Archives of sexual behavior, and it is accessible from online databases such as the National Center for Biotechnology Information and Springer (Vanwesenbeeck, 2017). The publication of the article was sponsored by Rutgers, Expert Centre on Sexuality. In this regard, this paper contains an evaluation of the article’s credibility and usefulness to determine its value to the research project.
Analysis
The first reason for selecting the article by Vanwesenbeeck is its high level of credibility. Reliability and authenticity are among the key factors that influence the credibility of a source. When a source is credible, it can be trusted by the readers or the audiences (Radom & Gammons, 2014). Reliability and authenticity are influenced by the credentials of the author and affiliations. Vanwesenbeeck is an expert sexuality matter and is affiliated to the Utrecht University, the Interdisciplinary Social Sciences section. The sponsor of the content, Rutgers, Expert Centre on Sexuality, specializes in matters related to sexuality, and its motive is to give expert guidance and advice. Sex Work Criminalization Essay
ORDER A PLAGIARISM – FREE PAPER NOW
Second, reliability and authenticity are influenced by whether the source is scholarly or not. The article by Vanwesenbeeck is peer-reviewed and is published in a renowned and influential journal. The content, the extent to which the author conducts research, and references to the source of information is also influential to reliability and authenticity (Radom & Gammons, 2014). In the article, Vanwesenbeeck backs up his claims with data from numerous empirical studies and adopts a critical approach to the analysis. The motive of the work also influences its authenticity. The Vanwesenbeeck’s motive is to give expert advice based on the recent issues related to the criminalization and decriminalization of prostitution in the Netherlands and other parts of the world. Based on the above evaluation, the article by Vanwesenbeeck is credible and has a high level of trustworthiness.
The second reason for selecting the article is its high level of relevance to criminalization and decriminalization of prostitution. The level of relevance influences the usefulness of a source. The thesis of the source focuses on expressing that criminalizing prostitution leads to numerous negative issues, including high exposure of sex workers rights violations, violence, and health risks. Vanwesenbeeck uses evidence from a wide range of empirical studies to show the extent of the negative impacts and how the decriminalization provides a solution to the issues. However, Vanwesenbeeck gives an insignificant focus on the potential negative impacts of decriminalizing prostitution. Despite this, the article will be very useful in the research project as a source of ideas for supporting arguments. The article will be useful as a source of evidence to support claims in the project. Sex Work Criminalization Essay
Conclusion
Overall, the article by Vanwesenbeeck is credible considering the credentials of the author, affiliations, content sources, motive, and sponsorship, among other factors. The article is also beneficial as a source of ideas and evidence for supporting arguments. Thus, it is one of the sources that will be very influential to the project.
References
Radom, R., & Gammons, R. W. (2014). Teaching Information Evaluation with the Five Ws: An
Elementary Method, an Instructional Scaffold, and the Effect on Student Recall and Application. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 53(4), 334-347.
Vanwesenbeeck I. (2017). Sex Work Criminalization Is Barking Up the Wrong Tree. Archives of
sexual behavior, 46(6), 1631–1640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-1008-3
- Reflection Questions
DIRECTIONS: Below your assignment, include answers to all of the following reflection questions.
- What types of questions did you ask yourself when evaluating the credibility and usefulness of your source? (2-3 sentences)
When evaluating the credibility of the source, I asked myself questions such as whether or not the author is an expert in the same field and the extent to which he backs up his ideas with empirical evidence. When evaluating the usefulness, I asked myself about how much content in the source can be used to support my arguments in the research project.
- How do you feel this evaluation practice will help you continue to move through the research process? (2-3 sentences)
I think that the evaluation practice will enhance my ability to gather reliable information from credible sources as I proceed with the project. In addition, it will help me locate the evidence needed to back up my claims. Sex Work Criminalization Essay