Health Care Literacy Presentation

Health Care Literacy Presentation

Details:
Select two strategies focused on health care literacy for developing an intervention targeted to a selected population or cultural community.

Use information and knowledge you have collectively gained from the course to create a PowerPoint slide presentation that accomplishes the following:

1. The presentation must incorporate information on policy formation, research, and technology.
2. You are required to use a minimum of six scholarly (peer-reviewed) articles, with citations.
3. Your presentation is to contain 12-15 slides, exclusive of title and reference slides, complete with speaker notes. Health Care Literacy Presentation
   

   ORDER A PLAGIARISM – FREE PAPER NOW

While APA format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines. 

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.

For strategy I will do population/cultural community, my state is NY.  For your strategy, I am planning to write on “Teach-Back Strategy” 

Health Care Literacy Presentation 

	1 Unsatisfactory 59.00%	2 Less Than Satisfactory 65.00%	3 Satisfactory 75.00%	4 Good 85.00%	5 Excellent  100.00%
100.0 %Criteria
30.0 %Selection of two strategies focused on health care literacy	Presentation does not incorporate two strategies focused on health care literacy.	Presentation incorporates two strategies focused on health care literacy, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient.	Presentation incorporates two strategies focused on health care literacy, but minimal detail or support is provided for one or more components.	Presentation incorporates two strategies focused on health care literacy and information is incorporated in full. The submission encompasses essential details and provides appropriate support.	Presentation incorporates two strategies focused on health care literacy and the information is comprehensive. The submission further incorporates analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate.
35.0 %Development of an intervention targeted to a selected population or cultural community	Presentation does not incorporate the development of an intervention targeted to a selected population or cultural community.	Presentation incorporates the development of an intervention targeted to a selected population or cultural community, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient.	Presentation incorporates the development of an intervention targeted to a selected population or cultural community, but minimal detail or support is provided for one or more components.	Presentation incorporates the development of an intervention targeted to a selected population or cultural community and information is incorporated in full. The submission encompasses essential details and provides appropriate support.	Presentation incorporates the development of an intervention targeted to a selected population or cultural community and the information is comprehensive. The submission further incorporates analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate.
8.0 %Presentation of Content	The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear. Speaker notes are absent.	The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information. Speaker notes are insufficient.	The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization or in their relationships to each other. Speaker notes are sufficient and clear.	The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes persuasive information from reliable sources. Speaker notes are detailed.	The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea. Speaker notes are comprehensive.
7.0 %Layout	The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.	The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.	The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability.	The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.	The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.
10.0 %Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.)	Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.	Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately.	Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.	The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly.	The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)	Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.	Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.	Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader.	Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present.	Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic English.
5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)	Sources are not documented.	Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Few outside sources were used to support the assignment. Limited research is apparent. The information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient.	Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Research and citations are adequate regarding source, number, and rigor of resources selected. Sources are standard in relevance, quality of outside sources, or timeliness.	Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Research and citations are timely and relevant, and address all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.	Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. Research and citations are supportive of the rationale presented. Sources are distinctive and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.
100 %Total Weightage