Case study Women’s and Men’s Health, Infections, and Hematologic Disorders
Case study Women’s and Men’s Health, Infections, and Hematologic Disorders
Case study
A 14-year-old female is brought to the urgent care by her mother, who states that the girl has had an abnormal number of bruises and “funny looking red splotches” on her legs. These bruises were first noticed about 2 weeks ago and are not related to trauma. PMH not remarkable and she takes no medications. The mother does state the girl is recovering from a “bad case of mono” and was on bedrest at home for the past 3 weeks. The girl noticed that her gums were slightly bleeding when she brushed her teeth that morning.
Labs at urgent care demonstrated normal hgb and hct with normal WBC differential. Platelet count of 100,000/mm3 was the only abnormal finding. The staff also noticed that the venipuncture site oozed for a few minutes after pressure was released. The doctor at urgent care referred the patient and her mother to the ED for a complete work-up of the low platelet count, including a peripheral blood smear for suspected immune thrombocytopenia purpura.
Assignment (2- to 3-page case study analysis) Case study Women’s and Men’s Health, Infections, and Hematologic Disorders
In your Case Study Analysis related to the scenario provided, explain the following:
· The factors that affect fertility (STDs).
ORDER A PLAGIARISM – FREE PAPER NOW
· Why inflammatory markers rise in STD/PID.
· Why prostatitis and infection happens. Also explain the causes of systemic reaction.
· Why a patient would need a splenectomy after a diagnosis of ITP.
· Anemia and the different kinds of anemia (i.e., micro and macrocytic).
Rubric Detail Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Develop a 1- to 2-page case study analysis, examining the patient symptoms presented in the case study. Be sure to address the following as it relates to the case you were assigned (omit section that does not pertain to your case, faculty will give full points for that section):
Explain the factors that a!ect fertility (STDs)
23 (23%) – 25 (25%)
The response accurately and thoroughly describes the patient symptoms.
The response includes accurate, clear, and detailed explanations of the processes related to women’s and men’s health, infections, and hematologic disorders and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.
20 (20%) – 22 (22%)
The response describes the patient symptoms.
The response includes accurate, explanations of the processes related to women’s and men’s health, infections, and hematologic disorders and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.
18 (18%) – 19 (19%) The response describes the patient symptoms in a manner that is vague or inaccurate.
The response includes explanations of the processes related to women’s and men’s health, infections, and hematologic disorders, with explanations that are vague or based on inappropriate evidence/research.
0 (0%) – 17 (17%) The response describes the patient symptoms in a manner that is vague and inaccurate, or the description is missing.
The response does not include explanations of the processes related to women’s and men’s health, infections, and hematologic disorders, or the explanations are vague or based on inappropriate evidence/research Case study Women’s and Men’s Health, Infections, and Hematologic Disorders.
Explain why in”ammatory markers rise in
18 (18%) – 20 (20%)
16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
14 (14%) – 15 (15%) The response
0 (0%) – 13 (13%) The response
Name: NURS_6501_Module7_Case Study_Assignment_Rubric EXIT
Grid View List View
2/4/21, 2:33 PM Page 1 of 5
STD/PID The response includes an accurate, complete, detailed, and speci!c analysis of the concepts and principles of pathophysiology across the life span and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.
The response includes an accurate explanation of how the highlighted processes interact to a”ect the patient and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.
includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of how the highlighted processes interact to a”ect the patient, with explanations that are based on inappropriate evidence/research.
includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of how the highlighted processes interact to a”ect the patient, with explanations that are based on inappropriate or missing evidence/research.
Explain why prostatitis and infection happen. Also explain the causes of systemic reaction.
18 (18%) – 20 (20%) Case study Women’s and Men’s Health, Infections, and Hematologic Disorders
The response includes an accurate, complete, detailed, and speci!c explanation of how the highlighted processes interact to a”ect the patient and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.
16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
The response includes an accurate explanation of how the highlighted processes interact to a”ect the patient and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.
14 (14%) – 15 (15%) The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of how the highlighted processes interact to a”ect the patient, with explanations that are based on inappropriate evidence/research.
0 (0%) – 13 (13%) The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of how the highlighted processes interact to a”ect the patient, with explanations that are based on inappropriate or missing evidence/research.
Explain why a patient would need a splenectomy after a diagnosis of ITP.
5 (5%) – 10 (10%) The response includes an accurate, complete, detailed, and speci!c explanation of racial/ethnic variables that may impact
4 (4%) – 4 (4%) The response includes an accurate explanation of racial/ethnic variables that may impact
3 (3%) – 3 (3%) The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning, and/or
0 (0%) – 2 (2%) The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning, or the explanations are Case study Women’s and Men’s Health, Infections, and Hematologic Disorders
2/4/21, 2:33 PM Page 2 of 5
physiological functioning and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.
physiological functioning and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.
explanations are based on inappropriate evidence/research.
based on inappropriate or no evidence/research.
Explain anemia and the di!erent kinds of anemia (i.e., micro and macrocytic).
5 (5%) – 10 (10%) The response includes an accurate, complete, detailed, and speci!c explanation of racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.
4 (4%) – 4 (4%) The response includes an accurate explanation of racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.
3 (3%) – 3 (3%) The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning, and/or explanations are based on inappropriate evidence/research.
0 (0%) – 2 (2%) The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning, or the explanations are based on inappropriate or no evidence/research.
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support well- developed ideas, “ow logically, and demonstrate continuity of
5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for #ow, continuity, and clarity.
A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required
4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for #ow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.
The purpose, introduction, and
3 (3%) – 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for #ow, continuity, and clarity 60%-79% of the time.
The purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or o” topic.
0 (0%) – 2 (2%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for #ow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.
No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided.
2/4/21, 2:33 PM Page 3 of 5
ideas. Sentences are carefully focused— neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.
A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.
criteria. conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive.
Written Expression and Formatting – English Writing Standards:
Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
3 (3%) – 3 (3%) Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
0 (0%) – 2 (2%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding Case study Women’s and Men’s Health, Infections, and Hematologic Disorders.
Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running heads, parenthetical/in- text citations, and reference list.
5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors.
4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.
3 (3%) – 3 (3%) Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.
0 (0%) – 2 (2%) Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
Total Points: 100
Do you need HELP in your Academic writing? Our team of excellent writers are here for your
