Discussion: Politics and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Regardless of political affiliation, individuals often grow concerned when considering perceived competing interests of government and their impact on topics of interest to them. The realm of healthcare is no different. Some people feel that local, state, and federal policies and legislation can be either helped or hindered by interests other than the benefit to society.
The suppliers of legislative benefits are legislators, and their primary goal is to be re-elected. Thus, legislators need to maximize their chances for re-election, which requires political support. Legislators are assumed to be rational and to make cost-benefit calculations when faced with demands for legislation. However, the legislator’s cost-benefit calculations are not the cost-benefits to society of enacting particular legislation. Instead, the benefits are the additional political support the legislator would receive from supporting legislation and the lost political support they would incur as a result of their action. When the benefit to legislators (positive political support) exceeds their costs (negative political support) they will support legislation. (page 27)
Source: Feldstein, P. (2006). The politics of health legislation: An economic perspective (3rd ed.). Chicago, IL: Health Administration Press.
To Prepare:
· Review the Resources and reflect on efforts to repeal/replace the Affordable Care Act (ACA).
· Consider who benefits the most when policy is developed and in the context of policy implementation.
By Day 3 of Week 3
Post an explanation for how you think the cost-benefit analysis in the statement from page 27 of Feldstein (2006) affected efforts to repeal/replace the ACA. Then, explain how analyses such as the one portrayed by the Feldstein statement may affect decisions by legislative leaders in recommending or positioning national policies (e.g., Congress’ decisions impacting Medicare or Medicaid).
By Day 6 of Week 3
Respond to at least two of your colleagues* on two different days by expanding on their explanation and providing an example that supports their explanation or respectfully challenging their explanation and providing an example.
RESOURCES TO READ
https://superbnursingessays.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/LOGO-300x75.png00developerhttps://superbnursingessays.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/LOGO-300x75.pngdeveloper2022-03-20 04:51:182022-03-20 04:51:18Who benefits the most when policy is developed and in the context of policy implementation
Guide to Community Prevention Services (2016). 2016 Annual Report to Congress, Federal Agencies, and Prevention Stakeholders. Retrieved from http://www.thecommunityguide.org/annualreport/2016-congress-report-full.pdf
Guide to Community Preventive Services (2013). Increasing physical activity. Accessed on July 14, 2016 from http://www.thecommunityguide.org/pa/index.html
Kahn, E. B., Ramsey, L.T., Brownson R., Heath, G.W., Howze, E.H., Powell, K.E., Stone, E.J., Rajab, M.W., Corso, P. and the Task Force on Community Preventive Services (2002). The effectiveness of interventions to increase physical activity: a systematic review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 22(4S), 73-107. Retrieved from http://www.thecommunityguide.org/pa/pa-ajpm-evrev.pdf
Task Force on Community Preventive Services (2002). Recommendations to increase physical activity in communities. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 22(4S), 67-72. Retrieved from http://www.thecommunityguide.org/pa/pa-ajpm-recs.pdf
Optional Readings
Committee on Health and Behavior: Research, Practice, and Policy, Board on Neuroscience and Behavioral Health (2001). Findings and recommendations. Health and behavior: The interplay between the biological, behavioral, and societal influences (pp. 329-350). Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Retrieved from http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=9838&page=329
Optional Resources
Purdue Online Writing Lab. (2018). General format. Retrieved from https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/general_format.html
Purdue Online Writing Lab. (2018). In-text citations: The basics. Retrieved from https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/in_text_citations_the_basics.html
The Task Force on Community Preventive Services recommends community-wide campaigns strategy to be effective in increasing physical activity and improving physical fitness among adults and children. Do you agree or disagree? Discuss your position in a 3-page paper.
The following items in particular will be assessed:
Discuss whether you agree or disagree with the findings that community-wide campaign strategies are effective in increasing physical activity and improving physical fitness among adults and children.
Defend your position by providing empirical evidence.
Based on your required readings and your own research, what strategies do you think are effective in increasing and maintaining a healthy, active lifestyle?
https://superbnursingessays.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/LOGO-300x75.png00developerhttps://superbnursingessays.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/LOGO-300x75.pngdeveloper2022-03-20 04:46:442022-03-20 04:46:44Health Behavior Case 4-Task Force On Community Preventive
In the Discussion for this module, you considered the interaction of nurse informaticists with other specialists to ensure successful care. How is that success determined?
Patient outcomes and the fulfillment of care goals is one of the major ways that healthcare success is measured. Measuring patient outcomes results in the generation of data that can be used to improve results. Nursing informatics can have a significant part in this process and can help to improve outcomes by improving processes, identifying at-risk patients, and enhancing efficiency.
To Prepare:
Review the concepts of technology application as presented in the Resources.
Reflect on how emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence may help fortify nursing informatics as a specialty by leading to increased impact on patient outcomes or patient care efficiencies.
The Assignment: (4-5 pages)
In a 4- to 5-page project proposal written to the leadership of your healthcare organization, propose a nursing informatics project for your organization that you advocate to improve patient outcomes or patient-care efficiency. Your project proposal should include the following:
Describe the project you propose.
Identify the stakeholders impacted by this project.
Explain the patient outcome(s) or patient-care efficiencies this project is aimed at improving and explain how this improvement would occur. Be specific and provide examples.
Identify the technologies required to implement this project and explain why.
Identify the project team (by roles) and explain how you would incorporate the nurse informaticist in the project team.
Rurbic:
In a 4- to 5-page project proposal written to the leadership of your healthcare organization, propose a nursing informatics project for your organization that you advocate to improve patient outcomes or patient care efficiency. Your project proposal should include the following:
· Describe the project you propose.
· Identify the stakeholders impacted by this project.
· Explain the patient outcome(s) or patient-care efficiencies this project is aimed at improving, and explain how this improvement would occur. Be specific and provide examples.
· Identify the technologies required to implement this project and explain why.
· Identify the project team (by roles) and explain how you would incorporate the nurse informaticist in the project team.–
Levels of Achievement:Excellent 77 (77%) – 85 (85%) The response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail the project proposed.
The response accurately and clearly identifies the stakeholders impacted by the project proposed.
The response accurately and thoroughly explains in detail the patient outcome(s) or patient-care efficiencies that the project proposed is aimed at improving, including an accurate and detailed explanation, with sufficient supporting evidence of how this improvement would occur.
The response accurately and clearly identifies the technologies required to implement the project proposed with a detailed explanation why.
The response accurately and clearly identifies the project team (by roles) and thoroughly explains in detail how to incorporate the nurse informaticist in the project team.
Includes: 3 or more peer-reviewed sources and 2 or more course resources.Good 68 (68%) – 76 (76%) The response describes the project proposed.
The response identifies the stakeholders impacted by the project proposed.
The response explains the patient outcome(s) or patient-care efficiencies that the project proposed is aimed at improving, including an explanation, with some supporting evidence of how this improvement would occur.
The response identifies the technologies required to implement the project proposed with an explanation why.
The response identifies the project team (by roles) and explains how to incorporate the nurse informaticist in the project team.
Includes: 2 peer-reviewed sources and 2 course resources.Fair 60 (60%) – 67 (67%) The response describing the project proposed is vague or inaccurate.
The response identifying the stakeholders impacted by the project proposed is vague or inaccurate.
The response explaining the patient outcome(s) or patient-care efficiencies the project proposed is aimed at improving, including an explanation of how this improvement would occur, is vague or inaccurate, or includes little to no supporting evidence.
The response identifying the technologies required to implement the project proposed with an explanation why is vague or inaccurate.
The response identifying the project team (by roles) and an explanation of how to incorporate the nurse informaticist in the project team is vague or inaccurate.
Includes: 1 peer-reviewed sources and 1 course resources.Poor 0 (0%) – 59 (59%) The response describing the project proposed is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.
The response identifying the stakeholders impacted by the project proposed is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.
The response explaining the patient outcome(s) or patient-care efficiencies the project proposed is aimed at improving, including an explanation of how this improvement would occur, is vague and inaccurate, includes no supporting evidence, or is missing.
The response identifying the technologies required to implement the project proposed with an explanation why is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.
The response identifying the project team (by roles) and an explanation of how to incorporate the nurse informaticist in the project team is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.
Includes: 1 or fewer resources.Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.–
Levels of Achievement:Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.Poor 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:
Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation–
Levels of Achievement:Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.Poor 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.–
Levels of Achievement:Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors.Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.Poor 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
https://superbnursingessays.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/LOGO-300x75.png00developerhttps://superbnursingessays.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/LOGO-300x75.pngdeveloper2022-03-20 04:42:092022-03-20 04:42:09The Impact Of Nursing Informatics On Patient Outcomes And Patient Care Efficiencies
Review the national healthcare issue/stressor you examined in your Assignment for Module 1, and review the analysis of the healthcare issue/stressor you selected.
Identify and review two evidence-based scholarly resources that focus on proposed policies/practices to apply to your selected healthcare issue/stressor.
Reflect on the feedback you received from your colleagues on your Discussion post regarding competing needs.
The Assignment (4-5 pages):
Developing Organizational Policies and Practices
Add a section to the paper you submitted in Module 1. The new section should address the following:
Identify and describe at least two competing needs impacting your selected healthcare issue/stressor.
Describe a relevant policy or practice in your organization that may influence your selected healthcare issue/stressor.
Critique the policy for ethical considerations, and explain the policy’s strengths and challenges in promoting ethics.
Recommend one or more policy or practice changes designed to balance the competing needs of resources, workers, and patients, while addressing any ethical shortcomings of the existing policies. Be specific and provide examples.
Cite evidence that informs the healthcare issue/stressor and/or the policies, and provide two scholarly resources in support of your policy or practice recommendations.
https://superbnursingessays.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/LOGO-300x75.png00developerhttps://superbnursingessays.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/LOGO-300x75.pngdeveloper2022-03-20 04:39:002022-03-20 04:39:00Critique the policy for ethical considerations, and explain the policy’s strengths and challenges in promoting ethics
SBIRT: Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment Presentation Guidelines
09/01/2018
Purpose
Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) is an evidence-based practice intervention used to identify, reduce, and prevent problematic use, abuse, and dependence on substances such as tobacco, alcohol and illicit drugs. The SBIRT model was incited by an Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommendation that called for community-based screening for health risk behaviors. The purpose of this assignment is to integrate SBIRT into nursing practice to help stimulate positive change at the individual and population focused level of care.
Course Outcomes
This assignment enables the student to meet the following Course Outcomes (COs).
· CO3: Plan prevention and population-focused interventions for vulnerable populations using professional clinical judgment and evidence-based practice. (PO 4, 8)
· CO4: Evaluate the delivery of care for individuals, families, aggregates, and communities based on theories and principles of nursing and related disciplines. (PO1)
Due Date
Submit your completed SBIRT presentation by 11:59 p.m. MT Sunday of Week 6.
Points: 225 points
Background information
SBIRT consists of three major components.
1. Screening—A healthcare professional assesses a patient for concerning behaviors using standardized screening tools. Screening can occur in any healthcare setting.
2. Brief Intervention—A healthcare professional engages a patient in a short conversation, providing feedback and advice regarding concerning behaviors.
3. Referral to Treatment—A healthcare professional provides a referral to resources and/or treatment options and additional services available (Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration [SAMHSA], n.d.)
Directions
1. Prior to starting the presentation, you are to read the assigned training.
SBIRT Education. (n.d.). Overview of screening, assessment and brief intervention: a nursing response to the full spectrum of substance use. Retrieved from https://hospitalsbirt.webs.com/nursingsbirt.htm (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
· Choose “Watch On Demand Recording”
· Start at minute 9:08/slide 12, end at 1hr 27 sec. (slide 80)
Or you may go directly to the YouTube video:
SBIRT Education. (2015, May 10). Overview of SBIRT: a nursing response to the full spectrum of substance use [Video File]. Retrieved from Overview of SBIRT: A Nursing Response to the Full Spectrum of Substance Use (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
Use this BNI checklist for the role play at the end: BNI Checklist (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. SBIRT Education. (n.d.). Brief negotiated interview checklist [PDF Document]. Retrieved from https://hospitalsbirt.webs.com/nursingsbirt.htm (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. You are encouraged to review the assignment tutorial found at the end of the Academic Integrity Reminder.
2. Next, choose one addiction or problem to focus on for this assignment from the options below.
· Alcohol
· Drug use (addictive prescription or illicit)
· You must be specific to which drug you are choosing
3. You are required to use one of the problems listed above. Assignments that do not follow the current guidelines or use the required forms or templates will be evaluated for evidence of an academic integrity violation. After the due date, there will be no opportunity for revision or resubmission of assignments that have been uploaded to the submission area. It is your responsibility to submit the correct assignment to the correct submission area.
4. After you have chosen the addiction/problem, you are to research SBIRT training specific to that problem/addition. Before starting to work on the presentation, it is vital you understand how SBIRT is used with that particular addiction/problem. You must find at least two scholarly resources (other than readings assigned in the course) and one video resource. Search YouTube for one SBIRT training video from a reputable source that shows a provider using SBIRT with a patient. Watch this video so that you understand the steps of SBIRT.
5. You may choose to complete this assignment as a PowerPoint poster or PowerPoint multiple slide presentation. Download the SBIRT PowerPoint poster (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. or slide presentation template (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..
6. Submit the completed PowerPoint poster or slide presentation by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 6.
7. Length: The poster should be one page with all boxes on template complete. The slide presentation should be no more than twelve slides, not including the title and references slides.
Guidelines
Below are the requirements needed for successful completion of the SBIRT: Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment presentation.
1. Introduction to the problem and/or addiction: Clearly identify the problem, and discuss specific statistics from your community related to this problem. You may use city or county data. For example, if you choose a specific drug, you should find the drug use rate in your city or county.
2. Problem description: Utilize one scholarly reference (not assigned in this course) to describe this problem/addiction. Discuss reasons why this may be a problem in your community. Cite all sources.
3. SBIRT description: Utilize at least one scholarly reference different from the one selected for the problem description above, and not assigned in this course, to describe how SBIRT is used with this specific addiction/problem. Identify specific steps and questions that are used.
4. Video: Locate and describe at least one video that demonstrates SBIRT related to the addiction you chose.
5. Citation: Cite all sources.
6. Community resources: Describe at least two available community resources to which you may refer people who have this problem or an increased potential for acquiring this problem. You are to provide the names of these resources and brief descriptions. You may use online resources if community resources are not available.
7. Conclusion/future implications for nursing: Provide a summary of your findings. Discuss the use of SBIRT in nursing practice.
8. References: Provide all references for all sources utilized. Use APA format, however, a hanging indent is not necessary.
Best Practices in Preparing PowerPoint
The following are best practices in preparing this presentation.
· Review directions thoroughly.
· We recommend that you use one of the linked templates. Replace the placeholder text with your own content. Use a black or colored font that is easy to read.
· Be creative. You may choose a design (from design tab) to enhance visual appeal.
· Incorporate graphics, clip art, or photographs to increase interest.
· Use short bullet points and large font for easier reading. For PowerPoint slides, use no more than eight lines per slide and no more than eight words per line.
· Do not use the notes are in the PowerPoint format (they are not visible in Canvas-Speedgrader)
· Cite all sources within the slides or poster with (author, year) as well as on the Reference slide or section.
· Proofread prior to final submission.
· Spell check for spelling and grammar errors prior to final submission.
Reference
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). (n.d.). SBIRT: Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment.
**Academic Integrity Reminder**
Chamberlain College of Nursing values honesty and integrity. All students should be aware of the Academic Integrity policy and follow it in all discussions and assignments.
By submitting this assignment, I pledge on my honor that all content contained is my own original work except as quoted and cited appropriately. I have not received any unauthorized assistance on this assignment.
https://superbnursingessays.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/LOGO-300x75.png00developerhttps://superbnursingessays.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/LOGO-300x75.pngdeveloper2022-03-20 04:35:532022-03-20 04:35:53Plan prevention and population-focused interventions for vulnerable populations using professional clinical judgment and evidence-based practice
Typically, a review of the literature is extensive as it should address all known aspects of a problem and describe how the problem has been studied in the past. For example,
What variables and questions related to the problem have already been studied and how does that to relate to the question being posed in the study you are proposing? Are the previous study findings applicable to today’s practice?
Who were the subjects in these other studies and how do they compare with your proposed subjects?
What research design, theoretical framework, data collection tool(s), statistics, etc., were used; and how do they compare to what you are proposing?
A good review of the literature lays down the proverbial breadcrumbs for future researchers to follow the rationale for how we arrived here from there. Sometimes it means we state the obvious, and other times it means we identify conflicting outcomes, outdated paradigms, gaps in practices, statistical test results to questions similar to ours, or suggest questions for future research. This assignment will give you a good understanding of how to compile the research findings needed for writing financial reports, grant applications/reports, business plans/Pro-forma, practice policies, processes, academic reports, clinical case studies, etc.
NRAO Majors: The review you write for this assignment should be a good start for your scholarly project due in your final MSN course. You and your advisor will work together to complete this requirement.
Upon successful completion of the Literature Review assignment you should be able to:
Address an identified problem through a systematic synthesized review of the literature.
Resources
Textbook: Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Approaches (2018), Chapters 4 and 5
Textbook: Practical Research: Planning and Design (2016), Chapters 3, 5, and 13
PowerPoint: Chapter 3 Review of Related Literature
PowerPoint: Chapter 5 Writing the Research Proposal
PowerPoint: Chapter 13 Plan & Prep Final Report
Textbook: Preparing Literature Reviews: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches (2016), Chapters 1 and 14
File: Horton APA Grading Guide IWU Version Final.docx
File: 6.2 Template for Literature Review – 1.15.2018.docx
File: Proposal Summary Form (due in 6.3)
File: Lit Review – SAMPLE
File: Sample Spreadsheet of Articles Reviewed (due with the Literature Review)
File: Spreadsheet of Research Study Analysis (due with the Literature Review)
Website: Evidence Based Practice Toolkit for Nursing
Website: IWU Off Campus Library Services
Website: How to Conduct a Literature Search http://0-apastylecentral.apa.org.oak.indwes.edu/learn/browse/TUT-10 and/or http://media.indwes.edu/media/Lit+Search+-+how+to+in+OCLS/0_7dn204mb
Website: How to Write a Literature Review https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t2d7y_r65HU and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2IUZWZX4OGI Part I https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UoYpyY9n9YQ Part II https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FK6Lsl1tcm0 Part III
Instructions
Read chapters 4 and 5 in Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Approaches (2018); chapters 3, 5, and 13 in Practical Research: Planning and Design; chapters 1 and 14 in Preparing Literature Reviews: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Review all other materials listed.
Using the quantitative research question developed in Workshop One, the articles analyzed in Workshops Two through Five and the draft summaries, write a synthesized literature review. Synthesize a minimum of 16 research articles. Use the TEMPLATE found in the resources above and the sample review as a guide.
You are not presenting everything about each study that you have read. Rather, present only the parts of the articles/studies which are applicable to your study.
Begin with an introduction section (Example: This is a review of the literature and research findings related to the perception of nursing as a call or as a choice by those who have been registered nurses over varying lengths of time.), and follow with sections and subsections (entitled specific to your problem), according to the rubric below.
Use the resources shared throughout the course, especially those in Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Approaches (2018), chapter 2, Practical Research: Planning and Design, pages 67-70, and the checklist in Preparing Literature Reviews: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches (2016),pages 116-124 and the examples on pages 149-166. (Watch https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t2d7y_r65HU (10 minutes if you would like to learn more about how to write your literature review.) KEY: The lit review is NOT an annotated bibliography, rather it is a synthesized presentation of the most recent and classic studies addressing your question focus, written in a scholarly manner.
It is difficult to give a page requirement because it will depend to some degree on the amount of literature available on the chosen topic. Most literature reviews are minimally in the range of 15 – 20 pages and are larger to accommodate a more complex question.
APA comprises 70 points in the rubric and will consider the points in the Horton fuideline (see Resources list above). An APA Reference page should be included at the end of the review.
When you have completed your assignment, you will submit three documents:
Submit your Literature Review into Dropbox by day seven of the workshop (TurnItIn enabled).
Submit your completed Spreadsheet of Articles Reviewed into the same Dropbox.
Submit your completed Spreadsheet of Research Study Analysis into the same Dropbox.
Please carefully read the rubric below for the necessary inclusions in your literature review/ content according to the rubric. You should use APA formatted headings throughout your paper which correlate with the bolded criteria below. All areas must be included. If there are some areas that do not apply to your particular literature review and proposed research study then you must explain the rationale for why that area is left out and confirm via literature.
Click here to access the dropbox.
Assessment Criteria, Literature Review
Assessed Criteria Items
Points
Synthesize a minimum of 16 research articles and address each of the highlighted topics below. Any area not covered sufficiently should be explained in the paper and preapproved by faculty as points will be deducted for any missing area. You should have a Level 2 heading for each bolded component listed below with appropriate content.
Presentation of the Literature (230)
Introduce the topic of inquiry, description of the problem, and its relevancy to nursing and the population of the proposed study. Do not use Introduction as a heading.
10
Organization of the Review – Describe how you have organized your paper and the outline the scope/boundary of your study. Tell what you are going to tell! Basically, describe the flow of the paper according to the major headings.
10
Definitions of the key terms pertinent to the topic which reflect current language and gives a reference for each.
10
Describes the Literature Sources, Study Types, Authors, Search Strategies included in the review. Describe search strategies, databases, key words/terms/phrases and engines.
10
Propose the quantitative Research Question and Variables (e.g., perhaps one of the studies suggested your study question) around which the review is focused. Present each of the independent and dependent Variables (as applicable) by its type. Describe each variable and how it generally interacts and the combined relationship around which the review is focused; describe other variable types as applicable i.e. confounding, etc.
30
Summarize the various Research Designsand Theoretical Frameworks (methodology, e.g., concept analysis) of the studies included in your literature review.
20
Summarize the Data Collection Instruments/tools used in the studies and how (the method used) data was collected.
20
Summarize the representative Population, Sample Participants, Risk, studied, how (methodology) they were selected, protected, and Informed Consent obtained. Address participant inclusion and exclusion criteria, IRB level of review, and informed consent.
25
Summarize the Statistical Analyses used to run the data to answer the question.
25
Summarize Study Results Related to the Problem, Question, and/or Variables, e.g., an organizing theoretical framework or model used in the studies.
10
Now present the key findings of the studies and compare them, e.g. one study found this and another found that related to the same variable. Present Other Considerations Related to the Proposed Study, and any Areas for Further Research as well. Use Level 2headings for your variables and/or topic, problem, and Level 3 headings for your subtopics, subproblems, or sub-concepts.
30
Present a Summary of the key points from the studies which frame the current status of the problem and variables. Last, summarize the attributes from the studies you will use in your proposed study, e.g. declare the:
Design appropriate for the proposed study.
Population and sample appropriate for the proposed study.
Data collection tool appropriate to the proposed study.
Statistics appropriate to the proposed study.
Theory, concept, or model appropriate to the proposed study.
30
Mechanics According to the Horton Grading Guideline (70)
Headings include the bolded words in the previous section; study topics and subtopics/subproblems/sub-concepts are specific headings.
15
Manuscript is organized in a logical fashion with appropriate subject topics under correctly formatted APA headings.
5
At least 16-20 current research studies are presented in a synthesized fashion; does not read like a series of annotated bibliographies.
20
Writing is coherent, smooth, and scholarly and without bias; APA formatting, and grammar are correct.
20
References appear in the review and vice versa with alphabetical reference list.
5
Studies are properly cited throughout the paper using APA format e.g. Davis & Jones, 2018; Kershaw & Rose, 2017; Holmes & Greer, 2015).
5
Total Points
300
https://superbnursingessays.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/LOGO-300x75.png00developerhttps://superbnursingessays.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/LOGO-300x75.pngdeveloper2022-03-20 04:32:372022-03-20 04:32:37Synthesized Literature Review Introduction
4. Each Coder’s DRG (all DRG’s) assignment accuracy rate
5. Overall accuracy of each DRG assignment (193, 194, and 195)
6. Each Coder’s overall accuracy for each DRG assignment (193, 194, and 195)
7. Pre-audit CMI
8. Post-audit CMI
Step Three: You have been asked to present your audit findings to the CEO. Create a Power Point Presentation (10 slides) which will demonstrate your audit findings. Be sure to use graphs, charts, diagrams, etc. Use the notes section of the power point. Be prepared to answer any of the questions that the CEO may ask about the data. Show overall and individual results. Identify overall and individual strengths and weaknesses. This should be a voice-over presentation.
Step Four: Submit your presentation for grading
Your Power Point should:
1. Be 10 slides in length
2. Contain Voice-Over
3. Cover each point (1-8) above
4. Be audience ready
5. Appropriate use of color, font and graphics
6. Appropriate use of Notes section with majority of information in the Notes and just highlights in the slides.
https://superbnursingessays.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/LOGO-300x75.png00developerhttps://superbnursingessays.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/LOGO-300x75.pngdeveloper2022-03-20 04:29:372022-03-20 04:29:37Knowledge of database querying and data exploration and mining techniques to facilitate information retrieval
The growth, development, and learned behaviors that occur during the first year of infancy have a direct effect on the individual throughout a lifetime. For this assignment, research an environmental factor that poses a threat to the health or safety of infants and develop a health promotion that can be presented to caregivers.
Create a 10-12 slide PowerPoint health promotion, with speaker notes, that outlines a teaching plan. For the presentation of your PowerPoint, use Loom to create a voice over or a video. Include an additional slide for the Loom link at the beginning, and an additional slide for references at the end.
Include the following in your presentation:
Describe the selected environmental factor. Explain how the environmental factor you selected can potentially affect the health or safety of infants.
Create a health promotion plan that can be presented to caregivers to address the environmental factor and improve the overall health and well-being of infants.
Offer recommendations on accident prevention and safety promotion as they relate to the selected environmental factor and the health or safety of infants.
Offer examples, interventions, and suggestions from evidence-based research. At least three scholarly resources are required. Two of the three resources must be peer-reviewed and no more than 6 years old.
Provide readers with two community resources, a national resource, and a Web-based resource. Include a brief description and contact information for each resource.
In developing your PowerPoint, take into consideration the health care literacy level of your target audience, as well as the demographic of the caregiver/patient (socioeconomic level, language, culture, and any other relevant characteristic of the caregiver) for which the presentation is tailored
https://superbnursingessays.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/LOGO-300x75.png00developerhttps://superbnursingessays.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/LOGO-300x75.pngdeveloper2022-03-20 04:26:352022-03-20 04:26:35Environmental factor that poses a threat to the health or safety of infants
This is TWO (2) discussion post. PLEASE USE the textbook below for reference and at least one SCHOLARLY PEER-Review
In Huston’s (2010) brief, but impressive article (required reading this week), the author outlines several leadership competencies that EVERY nurse leader will need for 2020. That year is not too far in the future, is it?
1. Select one of the eight leadership competencies Huston described and relate it to your own leadership of nurses and nursing. This should promote a robust discussion as we come from different clinical and nonclinical perspectives.
2. Discuss how the BSN-prepared nurse can assist a nurse leader in the budgeting process by contributing data readily available to the staff nurse.
Huston, C. (2010). What skills will the nurse leaders of 2020 need? (2010). Kai Tiaki Nursing New Zealand, 16(6), 14–15.
2nd Part
Do you possess the leadership skill to get you to the next level? After reading the Huston article, do you see these leadership skills on your unit/area? Please provide your reasoning and an example from your practice.
How does budgeting contribute to becoming a strong nurse leader?
Finkelman, A. (2016). Leadership and management for nurses: Core competencies for quality care (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
https://superbnursingessays.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/LOGO-300x75.png00developerhttps://superbnursingessays.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/LOGO-300x75.pngdeveloper2022-03-20 04:23:092022-03-20 04:23:09Leadership competencies that EVERY nurse leader will need for 2020
You have been hired as Assistant Manager of a Home Health Care Agency. The agency offers a wide range of skilled medical services such as nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy from qualified medical professionals. The agency also provides home health aide services including assistance with activities of daily living, such as bathing and eating.
Your supervisor told you that she recently received a call from an advocate whom an employee consulted via the Employee Assistance Program because the employee felt that she had been treated unfairly after contracting an illness. She explained that a few months ago, one of your agency’s home health aides, Sara, became ill. Sara had been coughing for approximately six weeks, lost weight without trying, had no appetite, was having difficulty sleeping, and had an intermittent fever. She became concerned and went to see a healthcare professional who diagnosed her with active tuberculosis (TB).
Sara missed a lot of time from work while completing treatment for TB. Her physician cleared her to return to work after she was no longer contagious. Upon returning to work, Sara felt isolated because her boss and co-workers refused to spend time with her. She heard that someone from the agency’s Human Resources Department told her co-workers her diagnosis. The stressful circumstances at work became even worse when another home health aide started to display the same symptoms Sara had.
Your supervisor has asked you to review the entire situation and how it was handled by the agency.
Now, in a complete 1-2 pages paper, address the following: (DO NOT WRITE QUESTIONS IN THE PAPER)
We have covered patient confidentiality in our previous courses. Keeping in mind the above scenario and Sara’s situation:
1. Discuss healthcare workers’ privacy and confidentiality in ensuring all workers are safe in the worksite?
2. Describe the role of the manager versus a leader in this scenario.
3. How this situation should be handled?
Your paper must include:
100% originality
1-2 pages count excluding title and reference page
Proper introduction and conclusion
3 credible references cited in APA
https://superbnursingessays.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/LOGO-300x75.png00developerhttps://superbnursingessays.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/LOGO-300x75.pngdeveloper2022-03-20 04:20:072022-03-20 04:20:07Healthcare workers’ privacy and confidentiality in ensuring all workers are safe in the worksite
Need help with this or a different assignment? We offer CONFIDENTIAL, ORIGINAL (Turnitin/LopesWrite/SafeAssign checks), and PRIVATE services using latest (within 5 years) peer-reviewed articles. Kindly click on ORDER NOW to receive an A++ paper from our masters- and doctorate-prepared writers.