Evidence-Based Practice Inquiry
Evidence-Based Practice Inquiry
| Module2
Weeks 3-4 |
Topic | Assigned Content/Readings
|
Assignments/Due Dates |
| Week 3
Models to Guide Implementation and Sustainability of EBP
Evidence-Based Practice Inquiry
|
Evidence-Based Practice
Models
Critically appraising the evidence
|
ReadMelnyk & Fineout-Overholt Ch. 14
Review APA Chapters 1-8
Assignment:Chose a EBP model that aligns with your PICO(T)and Complete Research Model Worksheet Instructions:After reading Chapter 14 in Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt. Review the following models and choose one that best fits your PICO(T), the organization where you work or where you would implement the PICO(T): IOWA Model of EBP, John Hopkins Nursing Process for EBP,Stetler Model of EBP, Stevens Start Model, Clinical Scholar Model, PARIHS Elements and Sub-elements, and ARCC Model Once you have chosen your EBP model complete the Research Model worksheet found in this module. This will guide your EBP study based on your specific PICO(T) ( and will be included in your Research Paper) Please complete this worksheet using APA 7th ed format . Review the following in Module 2 to provide guidance and examples in further detail: Research Model Worksheet Research Model Example
Submit Research Model Worksheet to the drop box Sunday by 11:59pm
|
Quizzes Due:
No quiz due this week
Discussion: No discussion due this week
Assignment: Submit Research Model worksheet to drop box Sunday by 11:59
|
| Week 4
Quantitative and Qualitative Evidence
|
Critically appraising the evidence
Technical Writing
Professional Writing
|
ReadMelnyk & Fineout- Overholt Chapters 5, 6,17. 18
Review: Literature Review Content found in Module 2
Read: Differences between qualitative and quantitative articles handout found in the content area of Module 2.
Discussion: Using the MSU library data baseidentify one Quantitative and one Qualitative article for your PICO (T) that demonstrates support your desired clinical question/intervention outcome and complete a literature review table for those articles . Answer all discussion questions for this section.
Make sure to continue to add articles from searches to the Database Research Table.
Assignment: Follow the Literature Review Rubric and Instructions and complete the Literature Review Template for your Quantitative and Qualitative articles as part of your discussion for week 4.
Looking ahead: Week 5 is when the first draft of Research Review (Part 1)
|
Quizzes Due:
No quiz due this week
Discussion: Initial responsesdue Wednesday by 11:59pm. Response to 2 peers and self-grading quiz due by Sunday at 11:59pm
Assignment:Submit your literature review template to the dropbox by Sunday at 11:59pm
|
Research Utilization Model
Student Name__________________________
Name of Model:
Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice to Promote Quality Care
Citation: (Ciliska et al., 2011, pp. 251-254).
Research Question / PICO(T)
In individuals undergoing elective total joint arthroplasty, how does preoperative placement of indwelling urinary catheters versus postoperative intermittent urinary catheterization affect urinary tract infections postoperatively?
Explanation of model and application to research question/ literature review paper
The Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice to Promote Quality Care (Ciliska et al., 2011, pp. 251-254) begins by formation of an evidenced based practice question. Then individuals from all departments or areas that may be impacted are gathered as a panel. The evidenced based question guides the panel’s review of the current literature. Based on those findings, recommendations are made to implement a change in practice (Ciliska et al., 2011, pp. 251-254). In gathering a panel and jointly formulating recommendations, all departments and areas are able to have a voice. This process helps develop ownership in the practice change and ensures a continuum of investment by the group in the process. Once a recommendation for change is reached, a pilot for change is initiated (Ciliska et al., 2011, pp. 251-254). Strengths and weaknesses of the recommended change are noted during the pilot. These findings are brought back to the original panel when the pilot is finished for evaluation. According to Ciliska et al. (2011), the panel reviews the findings and decides how to enact the change system wide if the pilot was successful. The panel can modify the change and send it back into another pilot if the findings were mixed. Rejection of the findings can also be a result of the pilot, which will begin the process over from the literature review and choosing a different practice change (Ciliska et al., 2011, pp. 251-254).
ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW
The research review will use the above evidence-based question in conjunction with the Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice to Promote Quality Care to guide the nursing practice change. The proposed panel should consist of representation from the surgical care ward, the post-anesthesia care unit, the intra-operative nurses and the orthopedic surgeons. The research included in this paper will provide the foundation for the panel to make recommendations to answer the research question and formulate an evidenced based practice change.
Reference
Ciliska, D., DiCenso, A., Melnyk, B.M., Fineout-Overholt, E., Stetler, C., Cullen, L., Larrabee, J.H., Schultz, A.A., Rycroft-Malone, J., Newhouse, R.P., & Dang, D. (2011). Models to guide evidence-based practice. In H. Surrena (Ed). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: a guide to best practice (2nd ed.). (pp. 251-254). Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
