Workplace Environment Assessment Assignment

/in /by

Workplace Environment Assessment Assignment

Assignment: Workplace Environment Assessment

Clearly, diagnosis is a critical aspect of healthcare. However, the ultimate purpose of a diagnosis is the development and application of a series of treatments or protocols. Isolated recognition of a health issue does little to resolve it.

In this module’s Discussion, you applied the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory to diagnose potential problems with the civility of your organization. In this Portfolio Assignment, you will continue to analyze the results and apply published research to the development of a proposed treatment for any issues uncovered by the assessment.

To Prepare:

  • Review the Resources and examine the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory, found on page 20 of Clark (2015).
  • Review the Work Environment Assessment Template*.
  • Reflect on the output of your Discussion post regarding your evaluation of workplace civility and the feedback received from colleagues.
  • Select and review one or more of the following articles found in the Resources:
    • Clark, Olender, Cardoni, and Kenski (2011)
    • Clark (2018)
    • Clark (2015)
    • Griffin and Clark (2014)

*Template completed in the Week 7 discussion should not be submitted with this assignment.

The Assignment (3-6 pages total):

Part 1: Work Environment Assessment (1-2 pages)

  • Review the Work Environment Assessment Template you completed for this Module’s Discussion.
  • Describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment you completed on your workplace.
  • Identify two things that surprised you about the results and one idea you believed prior to conducting the Assessment that was confirmed.
  • Explain what the results of the Assessment suggest about the health and civility of your workplace Workplace Environment Assessment Assignment.

Part 2: Reviewing the Literature (1-2 pages)

  • Briefly describe the theory or concept presented in the article(s) you selected.
  • Explain how the theory or concept presented in the article(s) relates to the results of your Work Environment Assessment.
  • Explain how your organization could apply the theory highlighted in your selected article(s) to improve organizational health and/or create stronger work teams. Be specific and provide examples.

Part 3: Evidence-Based Strategies to Create High-Performance Interprofessional Teams (1–2 pages)

  • Recommend at least two strategies, supported in the literature, that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.
  • Recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.

*****************************************************************************************

Workplace environment and civility

The workplace environment can be stressful and this can lead to healthcare professionals not being respectful to employee.  While taking care of patient’s nurses have to make sure the patients are safe.  Nurses have to be obligation to faster safe, ethical, civil workplace (Clark,2015).

Clark Workplace Environment Assessment

The score for the Clark healthy work inventory is 60 (Clark,2015).  My workplace is mildly healthy.  There is a small amount that will cause the organization communication uncivil, for example not communication with the staff, no teamwork, no respect for the leadership.  There has to be trust and respect among the staff.  The organization would have a high turnover.  The organization could get better by hiring new staff and get rid of the old staff.  The patients should always be safe, and get the care they need.

 

 

Example of Incivility in the Workplace

There was a certified nurse assistance who refused to give care to a patient.  The nurse asked the certified nurse assistant to give care to a patient, and the certified nurse assistant told the nurse why don’t you give care to the patient.  The nurse did write up the certified nurse assistant, and reported the problem to the unit manager and Director of Nursing, the certified nurse assistant was spoken to by the manager, which they should have been discipline as to be suspended.  The certified nurse assistant was back at work the next day; this is not good leadership.  When the nurse return to work and see no action has not been taken this will make the nurse feel the leadership is weak and not caring about the nurses, this will make the nurse to leave the organization.  The mangers will feel they will not have any staff to cover the shift, but that should not stop the managers from discipline the certified nurse assistant.  The organization will have a big turn over with nurses and certified nurse assistant leaving.  The nurse just want the patients to be safe and not to have any injuries Workplace Environment Assessment Assignment.

Reference

Clark, C. M. (2015). Conversations to inspire and promote a more civil workplace. American Nurse Today, 10(11), 18–23. Retrieved from https://www.americannursetoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/ant11-CE-Civility-1023.pdf

Clark, C. M. , Olender, L. , Cardoni, C. & Kenski, D. (2011). Fostering Civility in Nursing Education and Practice. JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration, 41 (7/8), 324-330. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0b013e31822509c4.

Sawada, U., Shimazu, A., Kawakami, N., Miyamoto, Y., Speigel, L., & Leiter, M. P. (2021). The Effects of the Civility, Respect, and Engagement in the Workplace (CREW) Program on Social Climate and Work Engagement in a Psychiatric Ward in Japan: A Pilot Study. Nursing Reports, 11(2), 320–330. https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep11020031

 

Rubric Detail

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric\’s layout.

Name: NURS_6053_Module04_Week09_Assignment_Rubric

 

ExcellentGoodFairPoorPart 1: Work Environment Assessment*Template, completed in the week 7 discussion, should not be submitted with this assignment· Describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment you completed on your workplace.· Identify two things that surprised you about the results and one idea that you believed prior to conducting the assessment that was confirmed.· Explain what the results of the assessment suggests about the health and civility of your workplace.

41 (41%) – 45 (45%)

The responses accurately and thoroughly describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment completed on a workplace.The responses thoroughly and clearly identify two surprising things about the results and thoroughly describe at least one idea that was believed prior to conducting the assessment that was confirmed.The responses accurately and thoroughly explain in detail what the results of the assessment suggests about the health and civility of a workplace.

36 (36%) – 40 (40%)

The responses accurately describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment completed on a workplace.The responses accurately identify two surprising things about the results and describe at least one idea that was believed prior to conducting the assessment that was confirmed.The responses accurately explain what the results of the assessment suggests about the health and civility of a workplace.

32 (32%) – 35 (35%)

The responses describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment completed on a workplace that is vague or inaccurate.The responses identify two surprising things about the results and describe at least one idea that was believed prior to conducting the assessment that was confirmed that is vague or inaccurate.The responses explain what the results of the assessment suggests about the health and civility of a workplace that is vague or inaccurate.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

0 (0%) – 31 (31%)

The responses describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment completed on a workplace that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.The responses identify two surprising things about the results and describe at least one idea that was believed prior to conducting the assessment that was confirmed that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.The responses explain what the results of the assessment suggest about the health and civility of a workplace that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.

Part 2: Reviewing the Literature· Briefly describe the theory or concept presented in the article you selected.· Explain how the theory or concept presented in the article relates to the results of your Work Environment Assessment.· Explain how your organization could apply the theory highlighted in your selected article to improve organizational health and/or stronger work teams. Be specific and provide examples.

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

The responses accurately and thoroughly describe the theory or concept presented in the article selected.The responses accurately and completely explain how the theory or concept presented in the article relates to the results of the Work Environment Assessment.The responses accurately and thoroughly explain how an organization could apply the theory highlighted in the selected article to improve organizational health and/or stronger work teams.Specific and detailed examples are provided which fully support the responses.

12 (12%) – 13 (13%)

The responses accurately describe the theory or concept presented in the article selected.The responses accurately explain how the theory or concept presented in the article relates to the results of the Work Environment Assessment.The responses accurately explain how an organization could apply the theory highlighted in the selected article to improve organizational health and/or stronger work teams.Specific examples are provided which may support the responses.

11 (11%) – 11 (11%)

The responses describe the theory or concept presented in the article selected that is vague or inaccurate.The responses explain how the theory or concept presented in the article relates to the results of the Work Environment Assessment that is vague or inaccurate.The responses explain how an organization could apply the theory highlighted in the selected article to improve organizational health and/or create stronger work teams that is vague or inaccurate.Vague or inaccurate examples are provided which may support the responses.

0 (0%) – 10 (10%)

The responses describe the theory or concept presented in the article selected that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.The responses explain how the theory or concept presented in the article relates to the results of the Work Environment Assessment that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.The responses explain how an organization could apply the theory highlighted in the selected article to improve organizational health and/or create stronger work teams that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.Specific examples are not provided to support the responses.

Part 3: Evidence-Based Strategies to Create High-Performance Interprofessional Teams· Recommend at least two strategies, supported in the literature, that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.· Recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.

18 (18%) – 20 (20%)

Using the literature, the responses clearly and thoroughly recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in the Work Environment Assessment.The responses clearly and thoroughly recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in the Work Environment Assessment.

16 (16%) – 17 (17%)

Using the literature, the responses accurately recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in the Work Environment Assessment.The responses accurately recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in the Work Environment Assessment.

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

Using the literature, the responses recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in the Work Environment Assessment that is vague or inaccurate, or only recommends one strategy.The responses recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in the Work Environment Assessment that is vague or inaccurate, or only recommends one strategy.

0 (0%) – 13 (13%)

Using the literature, the responses recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in the Work Environment Assessment that is vague and inaccurate, only recommends one strategy, or is missing.The responses recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in the Work Environment Assessment that is vague and inaccurate, only recommends one strategy, or is missing.Workplace Environment Assessment Assignment

Resource Synthesis

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Using proper in-text citations, the response fully integrates at least 2 outside resources and 2 or 3 course-specific resources.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Using proper in-text citations, the response fully integrates at least 2 outside resources and 1 course-specific resource.

3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Using proper in-text citations, the response minimally integrates outside and course-specific resources.

0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

The response does not integrate outside and course-specific resources or no in-text citations are used.

Written Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization:Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided, which delineates all required criteria.

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided, which delineates all required criteria.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated but are brief and not descriptive.

3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60–79% of the time.Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time.No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion is provided.

Written Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

Written Expression and Formatting:The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. Workplace Environment Assessment Assignment