Do you believe the proposal would be approved if formally proposed?

In this assignment, you will select a program, quality improvement initiative, or other project from your place of employment. Assume you are presenting this program to the board for approval of fundi

In this assignment, you will select a program, quality improvement initiative, or other project from your place of employment. Assume you are presenting this program to the board for approval of funding. Write an executive summary of  (1,000 words) to present to the board, from which they will make their decision to fund your program or project. The summary should include:

  1. The purpose of the program or project.
  2. The target population or audience.
  3. The benefits of the program or project
  4. The cost or budget justification.
  5. The basis upon which the program or project will be evaluated.

Take a look at your written proposal with  other colleague in a formal leadership position within a health care organization. Write on both your feedback using the following questions as prompts:

  1. Do you believe the proposal would be approved if formally proposed?
  2. What are some strengths and weaknesses of the proposal?

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines with 3 APA references.

Respond in a positive way(positive comment), to the post bellow, using one or more of the following approaches:Ask a probing question, substantiated with additional background information, and evid

Respond in a positive way(positive comment),  to the post bellow, using one or more of the following approaches:Ask a probing question, substantiated with additional background information, and evid

Respond in a positive way(positive comment),  to the post bellow, using one or more of the following approaches:

Ask a probing question, substantiated with additional background information, and evidence.

Share an insight from having read your colleagues’ postings, synthesizing the information to provide new perspectives.

Offer and support an alternative perspective using readings from  the classroom or from your own review of the literature in the Walden  Library.

Expand on your colleagues’ postings by providing additional insights or contrasting perspectives based on readings and evidence.

                                           Initial Post

The  research study’s focus was on the interventions to improve medication  adherence in people with multiple chronic conditions.  The population of  the study consisted of people over 70 years of age and having 3-4  chronic conditions.  A well-defined PICOT question helps to identify the  best available evidence to influence treatment (Echevarria, 2014).  The  PICOT question (P) The research study addressed medication adherence of  individual over the age of 70, (I) research involving eight studies  related to medication nonadherence, (C) Identified effective  interventions to improve medication adherence, and (O) evidence-based  treatment that assists in medication adherence would delay disease  progression.  

Design

             The design was a systematic review model by Cochrane Collaboration to  search, retrieve and appraise the quality and synthesis of the finding  of the RCT’s.  Out of the 248 abstracts only 97 were selected to be used  in full test and after an independent review by two separate reviewers,  only eight were chosen.  According to Polit, The Consort Checklist was  used to obtain the highest scores that could be used to generalize  results to similar groups.  “Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials)  for reporting information for a randomized controlled trial, including a  checklist and flowchart for tracking participants through the trial,  from recruitment through data analysis.” (p. 723). The researchers used  the Intervention Group, Control Group, and Randomized Control Trials to  come up with the results.  

Results

             The researchers came to their conclusion after conducting a quality  assessment of the randomized, control trials examining medication  adherence using the CONSORT Group.  The research study did identify  weaknesses in the study. Several RTC’s had methodological problems, did  not identify all medical conditions, explanation of interventions used  (William, 2008).  

Alternate Conclusion

             There was a wealth of data in this research study that could be used to  explore several different issues related to medication adherence.   Researchers could have drawn a conclusion based on the data they  identified, what chronic conditions are individual most like or less  likely to be compliant with their medications.  They did find that  further research is needed on this subject.

References

Echevarria, I. &. (2014, February). To make your case, start with a PICOT question.  Retrieved from OVID:  https://ovidsp-tx-ovid-com.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/sp-3.33.0b/ovidweb.cgi?WebLinkFrameset=1&S=NAAIFPMHKIDDHDBONCDKIAJCHHLHAA00&returnUrl=ovidweb.cgi%3f%26Titles%3dS.sh.22%257c1%257c10%26FORMAT%3dtitle%26FIELDS%3dTITLES%26S%3dNAAIFPMHKIDDHDBONCDKIAJCHHLHAA0

Polit, D. F. (2017). Nursing Research: Generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health.

William, A. M. (2008, July 4). Intervention to improve medication adherence in people with multiple chronic conditions: a systematic review.  Retrieved from Wiley Library Online: Retrieved From:  https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/doi/full/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04656.x

Understanding the Business Side of Health CareThe Business Side of Health Care infographic was created to show individuals how different entities contribute to the health care industry. For a long tim

Understanding the Business Side of Health CareThe Business Side of Health Care infographic was created to show individuals how different entities contribute to the health care industry. For a long tim

  • Understanding the Business Side of Health CareThe Business Side of Health Care infographic was created to show individuals how different entities contribute to the health care industry. For a long time most people assumed you were talking about doctors and nurses, i.e., the clinical aspect of health care, when discussing health care. As you complete this course and many others in your degree, it will be important to remember that there is a business side to health care that interacts with different entities to make the health care industry successful. As such, it is helpful if you remember that health care is an industry.Note: The terms “healthcare” and “health care” are often used interchangeably.Review the Business Side of Health Care infographic.Provide your own example of a company that contributes to each of the major health care entities listed in the infographic. Describe how the company contributes to the identified health care entity.Health Care EntityExample of CompanyCompany’s ContributionExample: Insurance CompaniesAetnaAetna provides health care insurance and coverage, products, and services to individuals and families, employers and organizations, health care professionals, and producers.Health Information TechnologyPharmaceuticalMedical Waste ManagementManufacturing CompaniesIdentify at least two additional health care entities that could be represented in the infographic.Health Care EntitiesDescribe why this entities can be represented in the infographicExample: Architecture and Interior Design Firms (facility design)Facility design firms provide products and services to different health care facilities that are planning to build new or redesign their current building space. They fit within this infographic because the designers need to understand medical terminology and health care concepts to build an effective space for their health care clients.1.2.*Note: Two additional lines are added for students to provide additional entities if they feel it is necessary.

Why did you select this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.

Examine Case Study: An Elderly Iranian Man With Alzheimer’s Disease. You will be asked to make three decisions concerning the medication to prescribe to this client. Be sure to consider factors that

Examine Case Study: An Elderly Iranian Man With Alzheimer’s Disease. You will be asked to make three decisions concerning the medication to prescribe to this client. Be sure to consider factors that might impact the client’s pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes.

  • At each decision point stop to complete the following:
    • Decision #1
      • Which decision did you select?
      • Why did you select this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.
      • What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.
      • Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with Decision #1 and the results of the decision. Why were they different?
    • Decision #2
      • Why did you select this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.
      • What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.
      • Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with Decision #2 and the results of the decision. Why were they different?
    • Decision #3
      • Why did you select this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.
      • What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.
      • Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with Decision #3 and the results of the decision. Why were they different?
  • Also include how ethical considerations might impact your treatment plan and communication with clients.

Identify the epidemiological event / problem including when and where it occurred.

provide an example of an epidemiology event (from a written source such as a newspaper or article)Identify the problem including when and where it occurred.Identify the host, agent, and environmental

provide an example of an epidemiology event (from a written source such as a newspaper or article)

  • Identify the problem including when and where it occurred.
  • Identify the host, agent, and environmental factors surrounding the event.
  • Identify if there were any health disparities.
  • Summarize your feelings and thoughts about the event.

Your submission should be 2-3 pages. In this assignment you must use accurate spelling and grammar and APA Editorial Format

Epidemiology Grading Rubric

Module 4 Epidemiology Written Assignment Grading Rubric

Criteria

Points Possible

Points Possible

Identify the epidemiological event / problem including when and where it occurred.

2

2

Identify the host, agent, and environmental factors surrounding the event.

2

2

Identify if there were any health disparities.

2

2

Summarize your feelings and thoughts about the event.

2

2

Spelling, Grammar, APA

2

2

What recommendations would you advance to hospital administrators to enhance their health care delivery with these goals in mind?

Assignment DetailsHealth care organizations are currently tasked with providing value-based health care. The concept of value-based health care is best illustrated in the Triple Aim Initiative outline

Assignment Details

Health care organizations are currently tasked with providing value-based health care. The concept of value-based health care is best illustrated in the Triple Aim Initiative outlined by the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI), which emphasizes the need for health care organizations to optimize their performance by simultaneously addressing the following three aims (2018):

  • Improve the experience of care
  • Improve the health of populations
  • Reduce the per capita costs of health care

Task

Identify a health care organization, and answer the following questions:

  • Do you think this organization meets these criteria? If yes, how? If no, why not?
  • What recommendations would you advance to hospital administrators to enhance their health care delivery with these goals in mind?
  • Do not forget to cite concepts and personal experiences in your response.

Explain how the incorporation of a global perspective or lens might impact your local practice and role as a nurse leader.

Assignment: Global Healthcare Comparison Matrix and Narrative StatementIf you talk about a possible poor health outcome, do you believe that outcome will occur? Do you believe eye contact and personal

Assignment: Global Healthcare Comparison Matrix and Narrative Statement

If you talk about a possible poor health outcome, do you believe that outcome will occur? Do you believe eye contact and personal contact should be avoided?

You would have a difficult time practicing as a nurse if you believed these to be true. But they are very real beliefs in some cultures.

Differences in cultural beliefs, subcultures, religion, ethnic customs, dietary customs, language, and a host of other factors contribute to the complex environment that surrounds global healthcare issues. Failure to understand and account for these differences can create a gulf between practitioners and the public they serve.

In this Assignment, you will examine a global health issue and consider the approach to this issue by the United States and by one other country.

To Prepare:

  • Review the World Health Organization’s (WHO) global health agenda and select one global health issue to focus on for this Assignment.
  • Select at least one additional country to compare to the U.S. for this Assignment.
  • Reflect on how the global health issue you selected is approached in the U.S. and in the additional country you selected.
  • Review and download the Global Health Comparison Matrix provided in the Resources.

The Assignment: (1- to 2-page Global Health Comparison Matrix; 1-page Plan for Social Change)

Part 1: Global Health Comparison Matrix

Focusing on the country you selected and the U.S., complete the Global Health Comparison Matrix. Be sure to address the following:

  • Consider the U.S. national/federal health policies that have been adapted for the global health issue you selected from the WHO global health agenda. Compare these policies to the additional country you selected for study.
  • Explain the strengths and weaknesses of each policy.
  • Explain how the social determinants of health may impact the global health issue you selected. Be specific and provide examples.
  • Using the WHO’s Organization’s global health agenda as well as the results of your own research, analyze how each country’s government addresses cost, quality, and access to the global health issue selected.
  • Explain how the health policy you selected might impact the health of the global population. Be specific and provide examples.
  • Explain how the health policy you selected might impact the role of the nurse in each country.
  • Explain how global health issues impact local healthcare organizations and policies in both countries. Be specific and provide examples.

Part 2: A Plan for Social Change

Reflect on the global health policy comparison and analysis you conducted in Part 1 of the Assignment and the impact that global health issues may have on the world, the U.S., your community, as well as your practice as a nurse leader.

In a 1-page response, create a plan for social change that incorporates a global perspective or lens into your local practice and role as a nurse leader.

  • Explain how you would advocate for the incorporation of a global perspective or lens into your local practice and role as a nurse leader.
  • Explain how the incorporation of a global perspective or lens might impact your local practice and role as a nurse leader.
  • Explain how the incorporation of a global perspective or lens into your local practice as a nurse leader represents and contributes to social change. Be specific and provide examples.
  • World Health Organization (WHO). (n.d.). Global health agenda. Retrieved September 20, 2018, from http://www.who.int/about/vision/global_health_agenda/en/

Assignment: Assignment Description: This assignment will be at least 1500 words or more This week you will reflect upon the Affordable Care Act and Patient Advocacy to answer the following questions

Assignment: Assignment Description: This assignment will be at least 1500 words or more This week you will reflect upon the Affordable Care Act and Patient Advocacy to answer the following questions

Assignment:

Assignment Description: This assignment will be at least 1500 words or more

This week you will reflect upon the Affordable Care Act and Patient Advocacy to answer the following questions:

  • How can you contribute to safe practice?  
  • Briefly define your role and tell how you will advocate for the healthcare consumer
  • Reflect on your future role changing as a result of policy changes
  • How do you see the role of your chosen profession changing in the near future?

Assignment Expectations: How will students be successful?

  • Length:
    • 1500-2000 words (6-8 pages); answers must thoroughly address the questions in a clear, concise manner
  • Structure:
    • Include a title page and reference page in APA style
  • References:
    • Two scholarly references are required; you should include the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions
  • Format:
    • Save your assignment as a Microsoft Word (.doc or .docx), Open Office (.odt) or rich text format (.rtf) file type
  • File name:
    • Name your saved file according to your last name, first initial and the week (for example, “jonesb.week1”)
  • Submission:
    • Submit your assignment to the Drop Box

instructionsImagine that this is the Grand Opening of your hospital’s Nutrition Center. As a member of the clinical nutrition team, you have played a part in the development of this nutrition, wellne

nstructionsImagine that this is the Grand Opening of your hospital’s Nutrition Center. As a member of the clinical nutrition team, you have played a part in the development of this nutrition, wellne

nstructions

  • Imagine that this is the Grand Opening of your hospital’s Nutrition Center. As a member of the clinical nutrition team, you have played a part in the development of this nutrition, wellness, and weight loss center’s development. Therefore, when the first patients begin to sign up for nutrition assessments, you are eager to use some of the new nutrition programs and nutrition assessment tools. In this Assignment, you will be analyzing a client’s dietary intake record and providing a summary of his or her nutrient intake. Upon analyzing the client’s dietary intake you will also discuss other tools, methods and equipment that can be used to accurately assess the client’s nutrition status.

Description of client:

  • MM is a 40-year-old Hispanic mother of three teenage children who works as a counselor in a job placement bureau.
  • Occasionally smokes a cigarette when she is stressed — maybe five per week
  • Uses stairs at work; is tired at night when she gets home
  • The children’s birth weight ranged from 9-1/2 to 11 lbs.
  • Family history of heart disease, diabetes, cancer
  • Blood pressure was 140/92
  • Height 165 cm (5’ 5”)
  • Weight 93 kg (205 lbs.)
  • Glucose test values were 300 mg/dl at 1 hour, 248 mg/dl at 2 hours and 195 mg/dl at 3 hours
  • Serum cholesterol was 250 mg, HDL 36, LDL 200
  • Triglycerides 200 mg/dl.
  • Medications: Glucophage, Lexapro, multivitamin
  • Eats 2–3 meals per day, and eats goodies at the office
  • Irregular bowel movements
  • 24-hour recall:
    • Breakfast — Granola bar and a 12-oz. Diet Coke
    • Lunch: Large bowl of cream of broccoli and cheese soup and a sandwich with: luncheon meat turkey (about 3–4 ounces), lettuce, tomato, and 2 Tbsp. of mayonnaise from the cafeteria at work
    • Large sweet tea
    • Snack: 2 glazed doughnuts in break room
    • Snickers candy bar on the way home
    • Dinner: Stouffers Lasagna: about 2 portions
    • Small salad with 3 Tbsp. ranch dressing (made from a salad kit)
    • 1 piece of Texas Toast
    • 2 cans Diet Coke
    • Snack: Bowl of chocolate chip ice cream before bed

Choose a dietary analysis program (choosemyplate.gov) or others available on the internet and enter all of the client’s food into the program. Design a chart that includes a summary of the nutritional intake. This should include:

  • exact food description/food list and serving size that was entered into the program
  • total calories
  • total fat
  • total carbohydrates
  • total fiber
  • total protein
  • total sodium
  • at least four or more vitamins or minerals

Upon reviewing the client’s intake and other information about the client, choose other nutritional assessment methods or tools that can be used to accurately assess the client’s overall nutrition status. When choosing which nutrition assessment tools and methods to use, please provide evidence and reasoning as to why each method or tool is necessary to provide an accurate and complete nutrition assessment of this patient. (Ex: additional dietary intake history, physical measurements, and biochemical information)

Requirements

This Assignment should be 2–3 pages (one page can include the dietary/food intake analysis table). It should be in APA format and include at least two references.

Please be sure to download the file “Writing Center Resources” from Course Documents to assist you with meeting APA expectations for written assignments

The benchmark assesses the following competencies:1.4 Participate in health care policy development to influence nursing practice and health care.Research public health issues on the "Climate Change"

The benchmark assesses the following competencies:1.4 Participate in health care policy development to influence nursing practice and health care.Research public health issues on the “Climate Change”

The benchmark assesses the following competencies:

1.4 Participate in health care policy development to influence nursing practice and health care.

Research public health issues on the “Climate Change” or “Topics and Issues” pages of the American Public Health Association (APHA) website. Investigate a public health issue related to an environmental issue within the U.S. health care delivery system and examine its effect on a specific population.

Write a 750-1,000-word policy brief that summarizes the issue, explains the effect on the population, and proposes a solution to the issue.

Follow this outline when writing the policy brief:

  1. Describe the policy health issue. Include the following information: (a) what population is affected, (b) at what level does it occur (local, state, or national), and (c) evidence about the issues supported by resources.
  2. Create a problem statement.
  3. Provide suggestions for addressing the health issue caused by the current policy. Describe what steps are required to initiate policy change. Include necessary stakeholders (government officials, administrator) and budget or funding considerations, if applicable.
  4. Discuss the impact on the health care delivery system.

Include three peer-reviewed sources and two other sources to support the policy brief.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. 

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

RUBRIC

Attempt Start Date: 29-Apr-2019 at 12:00:00 AM

Due Date: 05-May-2019 at 11:59:59 PM

Maximum Points: 120.0

Benchmark – Policy Brief – Rubric

No of Criteria: 9 Achievement Levels: 5CriteriaAchievement LevelsDescriptionPercentageUnsatisfactory0.00 %Less than Satisfactory75.00 %Satisfactory79.00 %Good89.00 %Excellent100.00 %Content80.0     Description of Policy Health Issue 20.0Description of the policy issue is omitted.An incomplete description of the policy issue is presented. The origin of this policy is unclear. There is no evidence that this policy creates a health issue, or that it is an issue for the population selected. The level at which the issue occurs has not been identified. There are major inaccuracies. A description of the policy issue is summarized. The origin of the policy is described, but it is unclear why the policy creates a health issue for the population selected. The level at which the issue occurs is identified. There are some inaccuracies. More information and rationale are needed.A general description of the policy issue is presented. The origin of the policy is described and a correlation between the policy and the health issue for the population selected is established. The level at which this occurs is discussed. Some rationale or detail is needed for clarity.A detailed description of the policy issue is presented. The origin of the policy is described and a strong correlation between the policy and the health issue for the population selected is established. The level at which this occurs is discussed. Strong rationale and evidence are offered for support. Insight into the policy health issue is demonstrated.Problem Statement20.0A problem statement is not included.A problem statement is present but lacks detail or is incomplete. Subject knowledge is unclear or inconsistent.A problem statement is present. Some subject knowledge is evident.A problem statement is included, and subject knowledge is competent.A problem statement is thoroughly developed with supporting details.Suggestions for Addressing the Policy Health Issue (C 1.4 Participate in health care policy development to influence nursing practice and health care.)20.0Suggestions for addressing the policy health issue are not included.Suggestions for addressing the policy health issue are incomplete. Suggestions do not include all assignment criteria. The suggestions do not support policy change for the policy health issue.Suggestions for addressing the issue are present. Some subject knowledge is evident. Most assignment criteria are met. The suggestions generally outline steps for policy change. More information or evidence is needed.Suggestions for addressing the issue are present, and subject knowledge is competent. All assignment criteria are met. The suggestions outline steps for policy change. Minor detail is needed for clarity.Suggestions for addressing the issue are thoroughly developed with supporting details. All assignment criteria are met and well-supported. The suggestions are well-supported and offer clear steps for initiating policy change.Impact on Health Care Delivery System20.0A discussion on the impact on the health care delivery system is not included.A discussion on the impact on the health care delivery system is present but lacks detail or is incomplete. Subject knowledge is unclear or inconsistent.A discussion on the impact on the health care delivery system is present. Some subject knowledge is evident.A discussion on the impact on the health care delivery system is present, and subject knowledge is competent.A discussion on the impact on the health care delivery system is thoroughly developed with supporting details.Organization and Effectiveness 15.0     Thesis Development and Purpose5.0Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.Argument Logic and Construction5.0Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)5.0Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present.Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.Format5.0     Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)2.0Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.All format elements are correct. Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)3.0Sources are not documented.Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.Total Percentage  100