Explain your data analyses results and describe what data quality assurances you applied to ensure your results are accurate.

/in /by

Week 1, you analyzed a pre-intervention elementary school asthma database from the perspective of a public health informatician. This week, you will review the data set in more detail and discuss the

Week 1, you analyzed a pre-intervention elementary school asthma database from the perspective of a public health informatician. This week, you will review the data set in more detail and discuss the tools informaticians use. For the asthma data summary, you will use your Excel Spreadsheet and Pivot Table reports. You will then answer the following questions in the form of a 3–4-page summary statement that includes the data as well as an interpretation of the findings. The Pivot Tables need to be embedded in your report to explain the summary results.

What summary results do your pivot tables demonstrate about this grade school population of students? Use the following questions to prepare your paper.

Data Frequency Questions:

Introduction:

Begin with an explanation of the tools of informatics, including spreadsheets, relational database technologies, and integrated statistical packages. Why are these tools and technologies so important when managing large databases of public health informatics?

Database Analyses

  • Are there more males or females in the survey population?
  • Which condition has the highest frequency?
  • Which month had the highest number of students with breathing difficulties?
  • Which school had the highest frequency of students with bronchitis?
  • Which gender has the highest frequency of asthma?
  • How many students answered yes to Reactive Airway Disease (RAD)?
  • What is the percentage of students with RAD that have been prescribed medication?
  • Which zip code has the highest number of students living in it?
  • Of that zip code, which condition had the highest frequency?
  • How many students answered yes to all four conditions: asthma, RAD, bronchitis, and wheezing?
  • Based on all four conditions and zip code, are the conditions evenly distributed among the survey population?
  • Does one school have more students in the affected zip codes and with all four conditions than the others do?
  • Summary:
  • Explain your data analyses results and describe what data quality assurances you applied to ensure your results are accurate.

Submission Details:

  • Give reasons and examples in support of your responses. Cite all sources using APA format.
  • Submit 3–4-page report in a Word document to the Submissions Area by the due date assigned.
  • Name your document SU_PHE6203_W2_A2_LastName_FirstInitial.doc.

Attachments

One of the key principles in medicine today is evidence-based practice in nursing (EBP). This is the practice of medicine based on solid research, as it adheres to standards for high quality and saf

/in /by

One of the key principles in medicine today is evidence-based practice in nursing (EBP). This is the practice of medicine based on solid research, as it adheres to standards for high quality and saf

 One of the key principles in medicine today is evidence-based practice in nursing (EBP). This is the practice of medicine based on solid research, as it adheres to standards for high quality and safety, all while focusing on patients’ needs. 

Guidelines:

Student may use numerous forms including web pages journal articles, text books, interviews, LIRN (40149) library.

Take time to look for professional resources who offer valid research and insight to your topic

Try to use a minimum of five current references, never rely on only 1-2 sources

Include a (1) Introduction, (2) Body and (3) Conclusion

  • The first word in every paragraph should be indented
  • Use Times New Roman font, size 12
  • Double space the entire paper

GRADING RUBRIC

(20) Points Introduction NO MORE THAN 7-10 Lines

(20) Points Body No more than 10-15 lines

(20) Points Conclusion No more than 5-10 lines

(10) Points Title Page

(5) Points grammar and plagiarism

(5) Response to a group

· Explore different conditions that could be the cause of the skin abnormalities in the graphics you selected.

/in /by

Assignment 1: Differential Diagnosis for Skin ConditionsProperly identifying the cause and type of a patient’s skin condition involves a process of elimination known as differential diagnosis. Using

Assignment 1: Differential Diagnosis for Skin Conditions

Properly identifying the cause and type of a patient’s skin condition involves a process of elimination known as differential diagnosis. Using this process, a health professional can take a given set of physical abnormalities, vital signs, health assessment findings, and patient descriptions of symptoms, and incrementally narrow them down until one diagnosis is determined as the most likely cause. 

In this Assignment, you will examine several visual representations of various skin conditions, describe your observations, and use the techniques of differential diagnosis to determine the most likely condition.

To prepare:

· Review the Skin Conditions document provided in this week’s Learning Resources, and select one condition to closely examine for this Assignment.

· Consider the abnormal physical characteristics you observe in the graphic you selected. How would you describe the characteristics using clinical terminologies?

· Explore different conditions that could be the cause of the skin abnormalities in the graphics you selected.

· Consider which of the conditions is most likely to be the correct diagnosis, and why.

· Download the SOAP Template found in this week’s Learning Resources.

To complete:

· Choose one skin condition graphic (identify by number in your Chief Complaint) to document your assignment in the SOAP (Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan) note format, rather than the traditional narrative style. Refer to Chapter 2 of the Sullivan text and the Comprehensive SOAP Template in this week’s Learning Resources for guidance. Remember that not all comprehensive SOAP data are included in every patient case.

· Use clinical terminologies to explain the physical characteristics featured in the graphic. Formulate a differential diagnosis of three to five possible conditions for the skin graphic that you chose. Determine which is most likely to be the correct diagnosis and explain your reasoning using at least 3 different references from current evidence based literature. 

Links:

http://www.skinsight.com/professionals
https://www.aafp.org/afp/2010/0315/p726.html
https://www.aafp.org/afp/2010/0315/p735.html

Discuss how individuals, professionals, and organizations use health information

/in /by

(turnit in Report and References)From electronic health records (EHR) to telemedicine, the use of information technology is rapidly expanding. Discuss how individuals, professionals, and organizations

(turnit in Report and References)

From electronic health records (EHR) to telemedicine, the use of information technology is rapidly expanding. Discuss how individuals, professionals, and organizations use health information. How can health information improve the provision of quality? Finally, after conducting research, discuss the possible future of information technology in healthcare.

  1. Title page
  2. Introduction
  • Discuss the importance of health information
  • Discuss how individuals, professionals, and organizations use health information
  • Discuss how health information may improve the provision of quality
  • Discuss the possible future of information technology
  1. Conclusion
  2. References

Requirements

The Assignment should meet all APA standards, be grammatically correct, appropriate and consistent research citation and documentation, appropriate graphics to display data and the results of analysis, and visual materials to support presentation of the overall document. Each section is to be a minimum of two

(2) pages and should include a separate title and reference page.

References are to be scholarly peer reviewed resources ONLY, with a minimum of four (4) references.

explain how the factor you selected might impact effects of prescribed drugs, as well as any measures you might take to help reduce negative side effects.

/in /by

Discussion: Pharmacotherapy for Respiratory DisordersTo the untrained ear, most coughs sound the same. However, as you might recall from past clinical experiences, a simple cough can lead to a patient

Discussion: Pharmacotherapy for Respiratory Disorders

To the untrained ear, most coughs sound the same. However, as you might recall from past clinical experiences, a simple cough can lead to a patient diagnosis of a common cold, pneumonia, or even a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Although it can sometimes be challenging to diagnose a patient based on common respiratory symptoms such as congestion, coughing, and wheezing, it is important to be able to distinguish minor differences as even mild symptoms might require intervention with drug treatments. When recommending potential treatment options, advanced practice nurses must consider how individual patient factors might impact the effects of prescribed drugs.

To prepare:

· Review Chapter 26 and Chapter 27 of the Arcangelo and Peterson text.

· Select and research one of the following respiratory disorders: the common cold, pneumonia, or a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) such as emphysema or chronic bronchitis. Consider types of drugs that would be prescribed to patients to treat symptoms associated with this disorder.

· Select one of the following factors: genetics, gender, ethnicity, age, or behavior. Reflect on how this factor might impact effects of prescribed drugs, as well as any measures you might take to help reduce negative side effects.

With these thoughts in mind:

Post a description of the respiratory disorder you selected including types of drugs that would be prescribed to patients to treat associated symptoms. Then, explain how the factor you selected might impact effects of prescribed drugs, as well as any measures you might take to help reduce negative side effects.

Create a communication plan for Mr. Smith and/or families for both prescriptive and non-prescriptive drug therapies. Describe what you would tell Mr. Smith and the child. Provide resources that Mr. Smith could access which would provide information concerning your decision.

/in /by

Assignment DirectionsDiscussion: Mr. Smith brings his 4-year-old to your office with chief complaints of right ear pain, sneezing, mild cough, and low-grade fever of 100 degrees for the last 72 hour

Assignment Directions

Discussion: Mr. Smith brings his 4-year-old to your office with chief complaints of right ear pain, sneezing, mild cough, and low-grade fever of 100 degrees for the last 72 hours. Today, the child is alert, cooperative, and well hydrated. You note a mildly erythemic throat with no exudate, both ears mild pink tympanic membrane with good movement, lungs clear. You diagnose an acute upper respiratory infection, probably viral in nature. Mr. Smith is states that the family is planning a trip out of town starting tomorrow and would like an antibiotic just in case.

Create a communication plan for Mr. Smith and/or families for both prescriptive and non-prescriptive drug therapies. Describe what you would tell Mr. Smith and the child. Provide resources that Mr. Smith could access which would provide information concerning your decision.

Assignment Requirements:

APA formatted paper of no more than five (5) pages excluding title page and references.

Before finalizing your work, you should:

·         be sure to read the Assignment description carefully (as displayed above);

·         consult the Grading Rubric (under Course Resources) to make sure you have included everything necessary; and

·         utilize spelling and grammar check to minimize errors.

Your writing assignment should:

·         follow the conventions of Standard American English (correct grammar, punctuation, etc.);

·         be well ordered, logical, and unified, as well as original and insightful;

·         display superior content, organization, style, and mechanics; and

*************I NEED A FIVE PAGE PAPER INCLUDING TITLE AND REFERENCE PAGE AND FREE OF PLAGIARISM***********

Defend how your proposed ethical guidelines will hold healthcare providers accountable to themselves, their profession, their patients, and the public.

/in /by

Prompt In this project, you will analyze a court case involving medical malpractice. Using your analysis of the case, you will address the facts pertaining to the medical standard of care, breach of c

Prompt In this project, you will analyze a court case involving medical malpractice. Using your analysis of the case, you will address the facts pertaining to the medical standard of care, breach of care, and causation. Further, you will use the facts from the original case to identify an ethics issue, determine an ethical theory that would help provide a safe and quality healthcare experience for the patient, apply a clinician–patient shared decision-making model, and augment or vary the facts of the case to change the outcome. 

You will use the following case to analyze for Final Project I: 

 Surgery: Iturralde v. Hilo Medical Center USA 

Specifically, your case study must address the following critical elements: 

I. Introduction: A. Summarize the selected case, including information on the stakeholders involved, the problem, and the time period the incident occurred. 

II. Medical Malpractice Component: In this section, you will evaluate the case to address the legal components, the malpractice policies similar to this case, and the standard of care given to the patient and how it was breached. Then, you will draw connections to how this malpractice case impacted stakeholders and healthcare consumers outside of the case. A. Explain the key legal components of the case, including the nature of the issue and the rules that applied. B. Determine relevant malpractice policies in place for addressing the issues within the case. C. Analyze the malpractice case for the standard of care provided to the victim. Be sure to apply what the law states about standard of care to support whether or not it was breached in the case. D. Analyze how the malpractice case would impact healthcare consumers from different cultural backgrounds. For example, would this case have a similar impact on a person from a culture different from the one in the case? How could this incident change the views of these healthcare consumers toward the healthcare system? E. Assess the malpractice case for accountability based on its severity. To what extent was the healthcare provider held accountable? 

3 

III. Ethical Component: In this section, you will evaluate the case to identify the specific ethical issues and determine ethical theories and shared decision- making models that would help resolve the issue and provide a safe, quality healthcare experience. Then, you will propose and defend ethical guidelines for healthcare providers to follow in order to avoid future incidents. A. Describe the ethical issues that led to the malpractice case and explain why the issues are credited with causing the incident. Support your response with research and relevant examples from the case. B. Describe an ethical theory that would help resolve the issue and provide a safe, quality healthcare experience for the patient. Support your response with research and relevant examples from the case. C. Select a physician–patient shared decision-making model and explain how it would provide a safe, quality healthcare experience for the patient D. Propose ethical guidelines that would have helped prevent the incident and would help the organization prevent future incidents. E. Defend how your proposed ethical guidelines will hold healthcare providers accountable to themselves, their profession, their patients, and the public. 

II. Recommendations: In this section, you will utilize the knowledge you gained from your malpractice and ethical analyses to recommend and defend strategies that would help improve medical practices and avoid future liability. A. Recommend preventative strategies the healthcare provider could implement to avoid liability in the future. B. Defend how your recommended preventative strategies would assist the healthcare provider in avoiding liability and provide a safe, quality healthcare experience for the patient. 

Defend how your proposed ethical guidelines will hold healthcare providers accountable to themselves, their profession, their patients, and the public.

/in /by

Prompt In this project, you will analyze a court case involving medical malpractice. Using your analysis of the case, you will address the facts pertaining to the medical standard of care, breach of c

Prompt In this project, you will analyze a court case involving medical malpractice. Using your analysis of the case, you will address the facts pertaining to the medical standard of care, breach of care, and causation. Further, you will use the facts from the original case to identify an ethics issue, determine an ethical theory that would help provide a safe and quality healthcare experience for the patient, apply a clinician–patient shared decision-making model, and augment or vary the facts of the case to change the outcome. 

You will use the following case to analyze for Final Project I: 

 Surgery: Iturralde v. Hilo Medical Center USA 

Specifically, your case study must address the following critical elements: 

I. Introduction: A. Summarize the selected case, including information on the stakeholders involved, the problem, and the time period the incident occurred. 

II. Medical Malpractice Component: In this section, you will evaluate the case to address the legal components, the malpractice policies similar to this case, and the standard of care given to the patient and how it was breached. Then, you will draw connections to how this malpractice case impacted stakeholders and healthcare consumers outside of the case. A. Explain the key legal components of the case, including the nature of the issue and the rules that applied. B. Determine relevant malpractice policies in place for addressing the issues within the case. C. Analyze the malpractice case for the standard of care provided to the victim. Be sure to apply what the law states about standard of care to support whether or not it was breached in the case. D. Analyze how the malpractice case would impact healthcare consumers from different cultural backgrounds. For example, would this case have a similar impact on a person from a culture different from the one in the case? How could this incident change the views of these healthcare consumers toward the healthcare system? E. Assess the malpractice case for accountability based on its severity. To what extent was the healthcare provider held accountable? 

3 

III. Ethical Component: In this section, you will evaluate the case to identify the specific ethical issues and determine ethical theories and shared decision- making models that would help resolve the issue and provide a safe, quality healthcare experience. Then, you will propose and defend ethical guidelines for healthcare providers to follow in order to avoid future incidents. A. Describe the ethical issues that led to the malpractice case and explain why the issues are credited with causing the incident. Support your response with research and relevant examples from the case. B. Describe an ethical theory that would help resolve the issue and provide a safe, quality healthcare experience for the patient. Support your response with research and relevant examples from the case. C. Select a physician–patient shared decision-making model and explain how it would provide a safe, quality healthcare experience for the patient D. Propose ethical guidelines that would have helped prevent the incident and would help the organization prevent future incidents. E. Defend how your proposed ethical guidelines will hold healthcare providers accountable to themselves, their profession, their patients, and the public. 

II. Recommendations: In this section, you will utilize the knowledge you gained from your malpractice and ethical analyses to recommend and defend strategies that would help improve medical practices and avoid future liability. A. Recommend preventative strategies the healthcare provider could implement to avoid liability in the future. B. Defend how your recommended preventative strategies would assist the healthcare provider in avoiding liability and provide a safe, quality healthcare experience for the patient. 

Workplace Environment Assessment Assignment

/in /by

Workplace Environment Assessment Assignment

Assignment: Workplace Environment Assessment

Clearly, diagnosis is a critical aspect of healthcare. However, the ultimate purpose of a diagnosis is the development and application of a series of treatments or protocols. Isolated recognition of a health issue does little to resolve it.

In this module’s Discussion, you applied the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory to diagnose potential problems with the civility of your organization. In this Portfolio Assignment, you will continue to analyze the results and apply published research to the development of a proposed treatment for any issues uncovered by the assessment.

To Prepare:

  • Review the Resources and examine the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory, found on page 20 of Clark (2015).
  • Review the Work Environment Assessment Template*.
  • Reflect on the output of your Discussion post regarding your evaluation of workplace civility and the feedback received from colleagues.
  • Select and review one or more of the following articles found in the Resources:
    • Clark, Olender, Cardoni, and Kenski (2011)
    • Clark (2018)
    • Clark (2015)
    • Griffin and Clark (2014)

*Template completed in the Week 7 discussion should not be submitted with this assignment.

The Assignment (3-6 pages total):

Part 1: Work Environment Assessment (1-2 pages)

  • Review the Work Environment Assessment Template you completed for this Module’s Discussion.
  • Describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment you completed on your workplace.
  • Identify two things that surprised you about the results and one idea you believed prior to conducting the Assessment that was confirmed.
  • Explain what the results of the Assessment suggest about the health and civility of your workplace Workplace Environment Assessment Assignment.

Part 2: Reviewing the Literature (1-2 pages)

  • Briefly describe the theory or concept presented in the article(s) you selected.
  • Explain how the theory or concept presented in the article(s) relates to the results of your Work Environment Assessment.
  • Explain how your organization could apply the theory highlighted in your selected article(s) to improve organizational health and/or create stronger work teams. Be specific and provide examples.

Part 3: Evidence-Based Strategies to Create High-Performance Interprofessional Teams (1–2 pages)

  • Recommend at least two strategies, supported in the literature, that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.
  • Recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.

*****************************************************************************************

Workplace environment and civility

The workplace environment can be stressful and this can lead to healthcare professionals not being respectful to employee.  While taking care of patient’s nurses have to make sure the patients are safe.  Nurses have to be obligation to faster safe, ethical, civil workplace (Clark,2015).

Clark Workplace Environment Assessment

The score for the Clark healthy work inventory is 60 (Clark,2015).  My workplace is mildly healthy.  There is a small amount that will cause the organization communication uncivil, for example not communication with the staff, no teamwork, no respect for the leadership.  There has to be trust and respect among the staff.  The organization would have a high turnover.  The organization could get better by hiring new staff and get rid of the old staff.  The patients should always be safe, and get the care they need.

 

 

Example of Incivility in the Workplace

There was a certified nurse assistance who refused to give care to a patient.  The nurse asked the certified nurse assistant to give care to a patient, and the certified nurse assistant told the nurse why don’t you give care to the patient.  The nurse did write up the certified nurse assistant, and reported the problem to the unit manager and Director of Nursing, the certified nurse assistant was spoken to by the manager, which they should have been discipline as to be suspended.  The certified nurse assistant was back at work the next day; this is not good leadership.  When the nurse return to work and see no action has not been taken this will make the nurse feel the leadership is weak and not caring about the nurses, this will make the nurse to leave the organization.  The mangers will feel they will not have any staff to cover the shift, but that should not stop the managers from discipline the certified nurse assistant.  The organization will have a big turn over with nurses and certified nurse assistant leaving.  The nurse just want the patients to be safe and not to have any injuries Workplace Environment Assessment Assignment.

Reference

Clark, C. M. (2015). Conversations to inspire and promote a more civil workplace. American Nurse Today, 10(11), 18–23. Retrieved from https://www.americannursetoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/ant11-CE-Civility-1023.pdf

Clark, C. M. , Olender, L. , Cardoni, C. & Kenski, D. (2011). Fostering Civility in Nursing Education and Practice. JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration, 41 (7/8), 324-330. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0b013e31822509c4.

Sawada, U., Shimazu, A., Kawakami, N., Miyamoto, Y., Speigel, L., & Leiter, M. P. (2021). The Effects of the Civility, Respect, and Engagement in the Workplace (CREW) Program on Social Climate and Work Engagement in a Psychiatric Ward in Japan: A Pilot Study. Nursing Reports, 11(2), 320–330. https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep11020031

 

Rubric Detail

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric\’s layout.

Name: NURS_6053_Module04_Week09_Assignment_Rubric

 

ExcellentGoodFairPoorPart 1: Work Environment Assessment*Template, completed in the week 7 discussion, should not be submitted with this assignment· Describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment you completed on your workplace.· Identify two things that surprised you about the results and one idea that you believed prior to conducting the assessment that was confirmed.· Explain what the results of the assessment suggests about the health and civility of your workplace.

41 (41%) – 45 (45%)

The responses accurately and thoroughly describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment completed on a workplace.The responses thoroughly and clearly identify two surprising things about the results and thoroughly describe at least one idea that was believed prior to conducting the assessment that was confirmed.The responses accurately and thoroughly explain in detail what the results of the assessment suggests about the health and civility of a workplace.

36 (36%) – 40 (40%)

The responses accurately describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment completed on a workplace.The responses accurately identify two surprising things about the results and describe at least one idea that was believed prior to conducting the assessment that was confirmed.The responses accurately explain what the results of the assessment suggests about the health and civility of a workplace.

32 (32%) – 35 (35%)

The responses describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment completed on a workplace that is vague or inaccurate.The responses identify two surprising things about the results and describe at least one idea that was believed prior to conducting the assessment that was confirmed that is vague or inaccurate.The responses explain what the results of the assessment suggests about the health and civility of a workplace that is vague or inaccurate.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

0 (0%) – 31 (31%)

The responses describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment completed on a workplace that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.The responses identify two surprising things about the results and describe at least one idea that was believed prior to conducting the assessment that was confirmed that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.The responses explain what the results of the assessment suggest about the health and civility of a workplace that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.

Part 2: Reviewing the Literature· Briefly describe the theory or concept presented in the article you selected.· Explain how the theory or concept presented in the article relates to the results of your Work Environment Assessment.· Explain how your organization could apply the theory highlighted in your selected article to improve organizational health and/or stronger work teams. Be specific and provide examples.

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

The responses accurately and thoroughly describe the theory or concept presented in the article selected.The responses accurately and completely explain how the theory or concept presented in the article relates to the results of the Work Environment Assessment.The responses accurately and thoroughly explain how an organization could apply the theory highlighted in the selected article to improve organizational health and/or stronger work teams.Specific and detailed examples are provided which fully support the responses.

12 (12%) – 13 (13%)

The responses accurately describe the theory or concept presented in the article selected.The responses accurately explain how the theory or concept presented in the article relates to the results of the Work Environment Assessment.The responses accurately explain how an organization could apply the theory highlighted in the selected article to improve organizational health and/or stronger work teams.Specific examples are provided which may support the responses.

11 (11%) – 11 (11%)

The responses describe the theory or concept presented in the article selected that is vague or inaccurate.The responses explain how the theory or concept presented in the article relates to the results of the Work Environment Assessment that is vague or inaccurate.The responses explain how an organization could apply the theory highlighted in the selected article to improve organizational health and/or create stronger work teams that is vague or inaccurate.Vague or inaccurate examples are provided which may support the responses.

0 (0%) – 10 (10%)

The responses describe the theory or concept presented in the article selected that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.The responses explain how the theory or concept presented in the article relates to the results of the Work Environment Assessment that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.The responses explain how an organization could apply the theory highlighted in the selected article to improve organizational health and/or create stronger work teams that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.Specific examples are not provided to support the responses.

Part 3: Evidence-Based Strategies to Create High-Performance Interprofessional Teams· Recommend at least two strategies, supported in the literature, that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.· Recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.

18 (18%) – 20 (20%)

Using the literature, the responses clearly and thoroughly recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in the Work Environment Assessment.The responses clearly and thoroughly recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in the Work Environment Assessment.

16 (16%) – 17 (17%)

Using the literature, the responses accurately recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in the Work Environment Assessment.The responses accurately recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in the Work Environment Assessment.

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

Using the literature, the responses recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in the Work Environment Assessment that is vague or inaccurate, or only recommends one strategy.The responses recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in the Work Environment Assessment that is vague or inaccurate, or only recommends one strategy.

0 (0%) – 13 (13%)

Using the literature, the responses recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in the Work Environment Assessment that is vague and inaccurate, only recommends one strategy, or is missing.The responses recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in the Work Environment Assessment that is vague and inaccurate, only recommends one strategy, or is missing.Workplace Environment Assessment Assignment

Resource Synthesis

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Using proper in-text citations, the response fully integrates at least 2 outside resources and 2 or 3 course-specific resources.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Using proper in-text citations, the response fully integrates at least 2 outside resources and 1 course-specific resource.

3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Using proper in-text citations, the response minimally integrates outside and course-specific resources.

0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

The response does not integrate outside and course-specific resources or no in-text citations are used.

Written Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization:Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided, which delineates all required criteria.

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided, which delineates all required criteria.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated but are brief and not descriptive.

3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60–79% of the time.Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time.No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion is provided.

Written Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

Written Expression and Formatting:The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. Workplace Environment Assessment Assignment

Explain the effect of health care policies, legislation, and legal issues on health care delivery and patient outcomes.

/in /by

Its very important I cover all the competencies…!Overview A new initiative has been introduced to educate nurses, health care workers, and social services workers on how to prevent workplace violen

Its very important I cover all the competencies…!

Overview 

A new initiative has been introduced to educate nurses, health care workers, and social services workers on how to prevent workplace violence where you work. Write a 750–1,000-word article on workplace violence and prevention measures for the hospital employee newsletter.

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria :

  • Competency 1: Explain the effect of health care policies, legislation, and legal issues on health care delivery and patient outcomes.       
    • Identify the political, legal, and/or legislative factors that may contribute to violence in health care settings.
  • Competency 2: Explain the effect of regulatory environments and controls on health care delivery and patient outcomes.       
    • Identify the main components of OSHA’s workplace violence prevention guidelines.
    • Explain the American Nursing Association’s position on violence in the workplace.
    • Explain safety policies and protocols for preventing and responding to violence against health care workers.
  • Competency 4: Communicate in a manner that is consistent with expectations of nursing professionals.       
    • Write content clearly and logically, with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and mechanics.
    • Correctly format citations and references using APA style.
  •  Assessment Instructions : 
  •     Your workplace has experienced some serious problems with workplace violence that occurred between patients and caregivers. A new initiative has been introduced to educate nurses, health care workers, and social services workers on how to prevent workplace violence. You have been asked to write an article on workplace violence and prevention measures for the hospital employee newsletter.
  • Preparation Search the Capella library and the Internet for scholarly and professional peer-reviewed articles on workplace violence. You will need at least five articles to use as support for your work on this assessment.
  • Directions Write a 750–1,000-word article (3–4 pages) on workplace violence and prevention measures for the hospital employee newsletter. Address the following in your article:  
    • Identify the political, legal, and/or legislative factors that may contribute to violence in health care settings. Consider the types of patients that may be treated within a clinical or hospital setting.
    • Compare OSHA regulations and the ANA position statement on workplace violence to organizational policies.
    • Explain safety policies and protocols for preventing and responding to violence against health care workers.
    • Additional Requirements Your presentation should meet the following requirements: 
    • Written communication: Written communication should be free of errors that detract from the overall message.
    • References: Cite a minimum of five resources, with the majority being peer-reviewed sources. Your reference list should be appropriate to the body of literature available on this topic that has been published in the past 5 years.
    • APA format: Resources and citations should be formatted according to current APA style and formatting.
    • Length: 750– 1,000 words or 3–4 typed, double-spaced pages, excluding title page and reference page. Use Microsoft Word to complete the assessment.
    • Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12-point.