In this Discussion, you will reflect on your own observations of and/or experiences with informaticist collaboration. You will also propose strategies for how these collaborative experiences might be improved.

Nature offers many examples of specialization and collaboration. Ant colonies and bee hives are but two examples of nature’s sophisticated organizations. Each thrives because their members specializ

Nature offers many examples of specialization and collaboration. Ant colonies and bee hives are but two examples of nature’s sophisticated organizations. Each thrives because their members specialize by tasks, divide labor, and collaborate to ensure food, safety, and general well-being of the colony or hive.

Of course, humans don’t fare too badly in this regard either. And healthcare is a great example. As specialists in the collection, access, and application of data, nurse informaticists collaborate with specialists on a regular basis to ensure that appropriate data is available to make decisions and take actions to ensure the general well-being of patients.

In this Discussion, you will reflect on your own observations of and/or experiences with informaticist collaboration. You will also propose strategies for how these collaborative experiences might be improved.

To Prepare:

  • Review the Resources and reflect on the evolution of nursing informatics from a science to a nursing specialty.
  • Consider your experiences with nurse Informaticists or technology specialists within your healthcare organization.

By Day 3 of Week 3

Post a description of experiences or observations about how nurse informaticists and/or data or technology specialists interact with other professionals within your healthcare organization. Suggest at least one strategy on how these interactions might be improved. Be specific and provide examples. Then, explain the impact you believe the continued evolution of nursing informatics as a specialty and/or the continued emergence of new technologies might have on professional interactions.

Make a suggestion based on additional evidence drawn from readings or after synthesizing multiple postings.

Respond using one or more of the following approaches:Ask a probing question, substantiated with additional background information, and evidence.    Share an insight from having read your colleagu

Respond using one or more of the following approaches:

Ask a probing question, substantiated with additional background information, and evidence.

    Share an insight from having read your colleagues’ postings, synthesizing the information to provide new perspectives.

    Validate an idea with your own experience and additional sources.

    Make a suggestion based on additional evidence drawn from readings or after synthesizing multiple postings.

    Expand on your colleagues’ postings by providing additional strategies for addressing barriers to EBP based on readings and evidence.

                                                          INITIAL POST

            Evidence-based practice is the standard that guides clinical practices within the nursing profession. Adams (2010) asserts that evidence-based practice “is defined as the integration of best research evidence with clinical expertise and patient values to facilitate clinical decision making” (Adams, 2010, p. 274). Polit and Beck (2017) maintain that there is no consensus about what does or does not constitute evidence. There are, however, agreed upon sources of evidence which exist within a hierarchy. Systematic reviews are at the pinnacle because information is derived from multiple sources.  Randomized controlled trials are next, followed by cohort studies, single case-control studies, cross-sectional studies, qualitative studies, and finally expert opinion reports. Knowledge translation is the process of using evidence to evoke systemic change within the clinical practice (Polit & Beck, 2017).

Managing Delirium

While working on a busy surgical floor, I was caring for a confused, combative, elderly patient with a urinary tract infection who had fallen and broken her hip. During report, the night shift nurse told me that she gave the patient multiple doses of haloperidol and lorazepam which were ineffective. The patient continued to be confused and agitated, and because she was a danger to herself by continually trying to get out of bed, the night shift nurse obtained an order for soft restraints. Springer (2015) contends that the nurse should determine if the utilization of restraints is appropriate based on the patient’s current behavior, and should only be used when all other options such as distraction and de-escalation are exhausted (Springer, 2015). Because I was not there, I must assume that the nurse used evidence-based practice to decide that the restraints were necessary.

When I went in to assess the patient, she was sleeping; and in my professional opinion, the restraints were no longer appropriate. I removed the soft restraints and put the patient on one to one observation with a nursing assistant. Not long into the shift, the light for that room came on, and I heard staff in the patient’s room yelling. I walked in to find the patient screaming and striking the nursing assistant as he was attempting to change the patient. It was clear that the patient was still experiencing acute delirium. However, the television was on, the blinds were open, and every light in the room was on. Instead of using a chemical or physical restraint, I turned off the television, lights, and closed the blinds. I sat down beside the patient, spoke softly and attempted to reorient her. Although she was still confused, she was calm.

Bull (2015) asserts that nursing interventions to manage delirium include providing a therapeutic environment, frequent re-orientation, anticipating the patient’s needs, ensuring sensory assistance devices such as glasses or hearing aids are in use, observing the patient’s response, and proceeding accordingly. Non-invasive interventions should be exhausted prior to restraining a patient chemically or physically (Bull, 2015). In this case, the patient responded to non-invasive interventions. I continued to use the one to one observation to ensure safety throughout the shift but did not need to escalate to using chemical or physical restraints. By implementing evidence-based practice, I kept the patient safe without using restraints.

Background and PICOT Question

    Background questions are broad, generalized questions that focus on a clinical issue (Polit & Beck, 2017). In this case, my background questions would be: what is delirium? And, what causes delirium? The acronym PICOT (population, intervention, comparison, outcome, and time) is a format used to create a research question with the subsequent goal of finding evidence-based solutions to implement into clinical practice (Polit & Beck, 2017). My PICOT question is: in delirious patients (population), what are the effects of non-invasive management techniques (intervention), compared to restraints (comparative intervention), on patient experience (outcome) and does either intervention increase or decrease the recovery period (time)?

Organizational Critique

I work as a float nurse in my organization, with previous experience in critical care. As a float nurse, I have a unique perspective on organizational culture because I work in multiple units. Overall, my organization does facilitate a culture of safety that promotes an environment where nurses learn from mistakes and do not place blame on one another. Written policies and procedures are easily accessible on the intranet. Moreover, my organization utilizes nursing shared governance which has a special committee devoted to practices and standards. Nurses are encouraged to bring practice issues to members of shared governance, and clinical practices are continually being updated and reviewed. If a nurse has an immediate question about a clinical practice situation, Clinical Nurse Specialists are available as a resource in addition to written policies and procedures.

Organizational Barriers

            Majid et al. (2011) report that most nurses have positive attitudes about evidence-based practice. However, some barriers which reduce the utilization of evidence-based practice include inadequate time to learn and implement evidence-based practice; nurses lack understanding of statistical terminology and research jargon, and technological deficiencies which inhibit informational searches (Majid et al., 2017). I believe that inadequate time is the primary barrier to evidence-based practice implementation within my organization. Time is finite, and working 12-hour shifts means nurses do not want to stay in late or come in early for any type of training. I propose that team nursing would provide individual nurses with the opportunity to attend training during regular working hours. Dickerson and Latina (2017) maintain that team nursing is the practice of nurses working in pairs to deliver patient care. A pair of nurses make up a team; both nurses get report on all patients shared by the team, Then, when one nurse needs to step away for a break, or in this case for training, their partner is already ready to take care of their patients.  

References

Adams, J. S. (2010). Utilizing evidence-based research and practice to support the infusion alliance. Journal of Infusion Nursing,33(5), 273-277. doi:10.1097/nan.0b013e3181ee037e

Bull, M. J. (2015). Managing delirium in hospitalized older adults. American Nurse Today,10(10). Retrieved from https://www.americannursetoday.com/managing-delirium-hospitalized-older-adults/.

Dickerson, J., & Latina, A. (2017). Team nursing. Nursing,47(10), 16-17. doi:10.1097/01.nurse.0000524769.41591.fc

Majid, S., Foo, S., Luyt, B., Zhang, X., Theng, Y., Chang, Y., & Mokhtar, I. A. (2011). Adopting evidence-based practice in clinical decision making: Nurses perceptions, knowledge, and barriers. Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA,99(3), 229-236. doi:10.3163/1536-5050.99.3.010

Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2017). Nursing research generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer.

Springer, G. (2015). When and how to use restraints. American Nurse Today,10(1). Retrieved from https://www.americannursetoday.com/use-restraints/.

Describe specifically how you can use this theory in your area of nursing (Practice, Education, Informatics or Administration).

Theory/Author Name and BackgroundSelect a Grand or Mid-Range Theory that is appropriate to your practice setting.Describe the theorist’s background in detail and discuss how their experiences have imp

Theory/Author Name and Background

  1. Select a Grand or Mid-Range Theory that is appropriate to your practice setting.
  2. Describe the theorist’s background in detail and discuss how their experiences have impacted the theory development.
  3. Examine crucial references for the original and/or current work of the theorist and other authors writing about the selected theory.
  4. Identify the phenomenon of concern or problems addressed by the theory.

Theory Description

  1. Explain whether the theory uses deductive, inductive or retroductive reasoning. Provide evidence to support your conclusion.
  2. Describe the major concepts of the theory. How are they defined? (theoretically and/or operationally) Is the author consistent in the use of the concepts and other terms in the theory?
  3. Interpret how the concepts are defined. Implicitly or explicitly?
  4. Examine the relationships (propositions) among the major concepts.

Evaluation

  1. Identify explicit and implicit assumptions (values/beliefs) underlying the theory. On what assumptions does the theory build?
  2. Examine if the theory has a description of the four concepts of the nursing metaparadigm. If so, how are they explained in the theory? If the metapardigm is not explained, what elements do you see as relevant to the theory and why?
  3. Discuss the clarity of the theory. Did it have lucidness and consistency?

Application

  1. Examine how the theory would guide nursing actions.
  2. Describe specifically how you can use this theory in your area of nursing (Practice, Education, Informatics or Administration).

3. Which of the following methods for providing healthy nutrition education to Jefferson County will be most efficient? Which will be the most effective method? Write a paragraph explaining your answer.

Economics Case Study

Economics of Health Care Delivery

Factors that influence the cost of health care include inflation, changes in population demography, technology, and intensity of services. The aging population is expected to affect health services more than any other demographic factor.

Jefferson County is rural area with several small towns scattered throughout the large county. More than half of the population are over the age of 65 and have incomes below the poverty level. You are a community health nurse specialist hired to help Jefferson County prepare for the increased need for health services.

You decide to implement a program that would open several nursing clinics operated by nurse practitioners and registered nurses. The nursing clinics will specialize in geriatric care and be located in easily accessible areas for Jefferson County residents. The nurse practitioners will provide primary care and referral services, and the registered nurses will provide health promotion education.

1. When developing and implementing your program, what microeconomic and macroeconomic factors do you need to be aware of because of their possible influence on your program?

2. How can you evaluate the economic effectiveness of your program?

3. Which of the following methods for providing healthy nutrition education to Jefferson County will be most efficient? Which will be the most effective method? Write a paragraph explaining your answer.

A.    Hold morning and evening educational sessions at the nearby community center.

B.    Set out informational pamphlets in the nursing clinic waiting room.

C.    Provide in-home, one-on-one education, demonstration, and follow-up with high-risk individuals already being followed at the center.

Carolyn Jones” is a 40-year-old professor of economics. The past week she has felt tried and weak. The past few days she has noticed small, red dots on her skin and gums. Even more upsetting, she cut herself while making dinner and the wound bled for a long time.

Please read everythingActing case study forum. Each student will be subdivided into group of 5 students. Each group will be assigned a case study for which the group will need to select the proper

  Please read everything

Acting case study forum. Each student will be subdivided into group of 5 students. Each group will be assigned a case study for which the group will need to select the proper scientific methods to solve the problem as well as support it utilizing a nursing theory.

Each student will be assigned a role: Narrator, Nurse Practitioner, Researcher, Patient, and Theorist. Each student will need to describe their role in the case study:

First Narrator will provide the story, then the patient and the nurse practitioner (NP) will displayed interaction based on the case study (Make it realistic), then the researcher and theorist will present the scientific steps to reach the solution that the NP arrived with supporting information and the theorist will present the nursing theory selected by the group that is best allocated to your study (Why that Nursing Theory was selected). Time allowed 15 minutes per group.. Please provide a short synopsis of the material being presented.

Rubric

Group 2: Case Study # 2

Carolyn Jones” is a 40-year-old professor of economics. The past week she has felt tried and weak. The past few days she has noticed small, red dots on her skin and gums. Even more upsetting, she cut herself while making dinner and the wound bled for a long time.

Objectives: 

The anatomic location and stimulus for platelet production.

The role of platelets in hemostasis and the consequences of a low platelet count.

The causes and treatment of thrombocytopenia.

The influence of the spleen on the number of circulating platelets.

Create a SOAP note for disease prevention, health promotion, and acute care of the patient in the clinical case.

Download and analyze the  case study for this week. Create a SOAP note for disease prevention, health promotion, and acute care of the patient in the clinical case. Your care plan should be based on c

Download and analyze the  case study for this week. Create a SOAP note for disease prevention, health promotion, and acute care of the patient in the clinical case. Your care plan should be based on current evidence and nursing standards of care.

Visit the online library and research for current scholarly evidence (no older than 5 years) to support your nursing actions. In addition, consider visiting government sites such as the CDC, WHO, AHRQ, Healthy People 2020. Provide a detailed scientific rationale justifying the inclusion of this evidence in your plan.

Next determine the ICD-10 classification (diagnoses). The International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) is the official system used in the United States to classify and assign codes to health conditions and related information.

Download the  access codes.

Download the SOAP template to help you design a holistic patient care plan. Utilize the SOAP guidelines to assist you in creating your SOAP note and building your plan of care. You are expected to develop a comprehensive SOAP note based on the given assessment, diagnosis, and advanced nursing interventions. Reflect on what you have learned about care plans through independent research and peer discussions and incorporate the knowledge that you have gained into your patient’s care plan.  If the information is not in the provided scenario please consider it normal for SOAP note purposes, if it is abnormal please utilize what you know about the disease process and write what you would expect in the subjective and objective areas of your note.

Develop and post cohesive paragraphs, and use evidence to support your ideas.

Describe one or more situations that illustrate social or cultural humility, or insensitivity, among your colleagues in a manner that fostered improved peer cooperation or efficacy of patient care or impeded such care.

Health conditions, including heart disease and respiratory infections, have no borders. What happens in one part of the world has ripple effects through the other parts, including the United States. Technology has created an even smaller world, with nurses in instant contact and eager to share information.

You and your nursing colleagues live and work around this shrinking professional world. Your nursing experience working with diverse populations presents a rich opportunity to share your international health perspectives. This exercise is a growth opportunity in terms of how we see ourselves, the world, and how we interact with our patients during the health interview and health assessment process.

In this week’s Discussion, your stories will illustrate relevant social and cultural differences among yourselves and your patients. The collective experience will expand your individual nursing knowledge; improve upon our cultural humility and perspectives, in order to foster social and culturally-sensitive health interviews and assessments. This, in turn, contributes to safer and higher quality outcomes for your patients. Consider how your sensitive care is expressed through choice of your words, maintaining a distance that is culturally appropriate, and utilizing other techniques to negotiate through established social and cultural values. This leads to patient trust and comfort and a respectful nurse-patient relationship.

a 2-paragraph response (at least 250–350 words) to one of the options below. Develop and post cohesive paragraphs, and use evidence to support your ideas.

Propose recommendations to strengthen the internal validity and assess the effect your changes could have with regard to the other three types of validity. Discuss the dangers of failing to consider the validity of a research study.

My Question:Post the title of the study that you selected and your analysis of the potential concerns that could be raised about the study’s internal validity. Propose recommendations to strengthen

My Question:

Post the title of the study that you selected and your analysis of the potential concerns that could be raised about the study’s internal validity. Propose recommendations to strengthen the internal validity and assess the effect your changes could have with regard to the other three types of validity. Discuss the dangers of failing to consider the validity of a research study.

To Prepare: 

  • view the information in Chapter 10 of the course text on rigor and validity.
  • Read the method section of one of the following quasi-experimental studies (also located in this week’s Learning Resources). Identify at least one potential concern that could be raised about the study’s internal validity.
  • Metheny, N. A., Davis-Jackson, J., & Stewart, B. J. (2010). Effectiveness of an aspiration risk-reduction protocol. Nursing Research, 59(1), 18–25.
  • Padula, C. A., Hughes, C., & Baumhover, L. (2009). Impact of a nurse-driven mobility protocol on functional decline in hospitalized older adults. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 24(4), 325–331.
  • Yuan, S., Chou, M., Hwu, L., Chang, Y., Hsu, W., & Kuo, H. (2009). An intervention program to promote health-related physical fitness in nurses. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 18(10), 1,404–1,411.
  • Consider strategies that could be used to strengthen the study’s internal validity and how this would impact the three other types of validity.
  • Think about the consequences of an advanced practice nurse neglecting to consider the validity of a research study when reviewing the research for potential use in developing an evidence-based practice.

analyze the case study for this week. Create a SOAP note for disease prevention, health promotion, and acute care of the patient in the clinical case. Your care plan should be based on current evidence and nursing standards of care.

SOAP Note Assignment Download and analyze the case study for this week. Create a SOAP note for disease prevention, health promotion, and acute care of the patient in the clinical case. Your care plan

SOAP Note Assignment

Download and analyze the case study for this week. Create a SOAP note for disease prevention, health promotion, and acute care of the patient in the clinical case. Your care plan should be based on current evidence and nursing standards of care.

Visit the online library and research for current scholarly evidence (no older than 5 years) to support your nursing actions. In addition, consider visiting government sites such as the CDC, WHO, AHRQ, Healthy People 2020. Provide a detailed scientific rationale justifying the inclusion of this evidence in your plan.

Next determine the ICD-10 classification (diagnoses). The International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) is the official system used in the United States to classify and assign codes to health conditions and related information.

Download the access codes.

Download the SOAP template to help you design a holistic patient care plan. Utilize the SOAP guidelines to assist you in creating your SOAP note and building your plan of care. You are expected to develop a comprehensive SOAP note based on the given assessment, diagnosis, and advanced nursing interventions. Reflect on what you have learned about care plans through independent research and peer discussions and incorporate the knowledge that you have gained into your patient’s care plan.  If the information is not in the provided scenario please consider it normal for SOAP note purposes, if it is abnormal please utilize what you know about the disease process and write what you would expect in the subjective and objective areas of your note.

APA format master nursing program 3-5 pages with 5 references 3 from walden university library. Project to be written on following PICOT question: In patients with urinary retention, what is the effect that straight catheterizing or self-catharizing, in comparison to indwelling catheter on increasing urinary infections?

FOR SURAYA ONLY

APA format master nursing program 3-5 pages with 5 references 3 from walden university library.  Project to be written on following PICOT question:  In patients with urinary retention, what is the effect that straight catheterizing or self-catharizing, in comparison to indwelling catheter on increasing urinary infections?

Course Project: Introduction to Course Project

Evidence-based practice involves a great deal more than simply reading nursing periodicals on a regular basis. Nurses can take a more proactive approach to evidence-based practice by identifying authentic problems and concerns, and then using that to guide their inquiries into current research. In this way, nurses can connect the results of relevant research studies to their nursing practice.

For the Course Project, you identify and apply relevant research to a specific nursing topic or problem. You begin by formulating an answerable question that is relevant to nursing and evidence-based practice. In later weeks of this course, you continue the Course Project by conducting a literature review and then determining how the evidence from the literature can be applied to nursing practice.

Before you begin, review the Course Project Overview document located in this week’s Learning Resources.

Note: This Course Project will serve as the Portfolio Assignment for the course. In addition to submitting portions of this Project in Weeks 2 and 5, you will turn in all three deliverables in Week 10.

Course Project: Part 1—Identifying a Researchable Problem

One of the most challenging aspects of EBP is to actually identify the answerable question.

—Karen Sue Davies

Formulating a question that targets the goal of your research is a challenging but essential task. The question plays a crucial role in all other aspects of the research, including the determination of the research design and theoretical perspective to be applied, which data will be collected, and which tools will be used for analysis. It is therefore essential to take the time to ensure that the research question addresses what you actually want to study. Doing so will increase your likelihood of obtaining meaningful results.

In this first component of the Course Project, you formulate questions to address a particular nursing issue or problem. You use the PICOT model—patient/population, intervention/issue, comparison, and outcome—outlined in the Learning Resources to design your questions.

To prepare:

  • Review the article, “Formulating the Evidence Based Practice Question: A Review of the Frameworks,” found in the Learning Resources for this week. Focus on the PICOT model for guiding the development of research questions.
  • Review the section beginning on page 71 of the course text, titled, “Developing and Refining Research Problems” in the course text, which focuses on analyzing the feasibility of a research problem.
  • Reflect on an issue or problem that you have noticed in your nursing practice. Consider the significance of this issue or problem.
  • Generate at least five questions that relate to the issue which you have identified. Use the criteria in your course text to select one question that would be most appropriate in terms of significance, feasibility, and interest. Be prepared to explain your rationale.
  • Formulate a preliminary PICO question—one that is answerable—based on your analysis. What are the PICO variables (patient/population, intervention/issue, comparison, and outcome) for this question?

Note: Not all of these variables may be appropriate to every question. Be sure to analyze which are and are not relevant to your specific question.

  • Using the PICOT variables that you determined for your question, develop a list of at least 10 keywords that could be used when conducting a literature search to investigate current research pertaining to the question.

To complete:

Write a 3- to 4-page paper that includes the following:

  • A summary of your area of interest, an identification of the problem that you have selected, and an explanation of the significance of this problem for nursing practice
  • The 5 questions you have generated and a description of how you analyzed them for feasibility
  • Your preliminary PICOT question and a description of each PICOT variable relevant to your question
  • At least 10 possible keywords that could be used when conducting a literature search for your PICOT question and a rationale for your selections