Information Systems in Healthcare Paper Guidelines (graded, 200 points)Updated 9/2018This assignment will be uploaded automatically to Turnitin when you submit your assignment.Turnitin is now more clo

Information Systems in Healthcare Paper Guidelines (graded, 200 points)

Updated 9/2018

This assignment will be uploaded automatically to Turnitin when you submit your assignment.

Turnitin is now more closely integrated with Canvas. Overall, you will find Turnitin assignments easier to use, but the steps to submit an assignment have changed somewhat. Directions are as follows: 

1. Click the orange “Submit Assignment” button at the top of the page to open the upload window. 

2. Click on “Choose File” to select your assignment file you want to upload. 

3. Check the box to agree to the Turnitin End-User License Agreement. 

4. Click “Submit Assignment.” 

5. Your Turnitin report will be visible in the “Grades” section of your course.  

TII File Upload Diagram

Please refer to the pages below for more information about these changes. 

• Turnitin Submitting a Paper (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. explains how to submit a file. 

• Turnitin Assignment Student View (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. lets you submit a paper, then view feedback on the file you have submitted. 

• Turnitin Viewing Instructor Feedback (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. helps you view your instructor feedback. 

Please contact your instructor if you have any questions.

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is explore the assigned topic related to information systems in healthcare, research and analyze the topic, and describe how you will apply your new found knowledge to your nursing practice.

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet one or more of the following Course Outcomes depending on the topic selected.

CO1: Describe patient-care technologies as appropriate to address the needs of a diverse patient population. (PO1)

CO2: Analyze data from all relevant sources, including technology, to inform the delivery of care. (PO2)

CO3: Define standardized terminology that reflects nursing’s unique contribution to patient outcomes. (PO3)

CO4: Investigate safeguards and decision-making support tools embedded in patient care technologies and information systems to support a safe practice environment for both patients and healthcare workers. (PO4)

CO5: Identify patient care technologies, information systems, and communication devices that support safe nursing practice. (PO5)

CO 6: Discuss the principles of data integrity, professional ethics, and legal requirements related to data security, regulatory requirements, confidentiality, and client’s right to privacy. (PO6)

CO7: Examine the use of information systems to document interventions related to achieving nurse sensitive outcomes. (PO7)

CO8: Discuss the value of best evidence as a driving force to institute change in delivery of nursing care. (PO8)

Points

This assignment is worth a total of 200 points.

Due Date

Your completed paper is due by 11:59 p.m. MT Sunday by the end of Week 4.

Be sure to submit your assignment. Post your questions to the Q & A Forum. Contact your instructor if you need additional assistance. See the Course Policies regarding late assignments and academic integrity. Failure to submit your paper on time will result in a deduction of points.

Topic

Topic for the focus of your paper.

Robotics in Healthcare (CO5, CO8)

Directions

You are required to complete the form using the productivity tools required by Chamberlain University, which is Microsoft Office 2013 (or later version), or Windows and Office 2011 (or later version) for MAC. You must save the file in the “.docx” format. Do NOT save as Word Pad. A later version of the productivity tool includes Office 365, which is available to Chamberlain students for FREE by downloading from the student portal at http://my.chamberlain.edu (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.. Click on the envelope at the top of the page.

You are to research, analyze, and write an APA-formatted scholarly paper on Robotics in Healthcare.

Click on the APA template (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. to complete this assignment.

Write an introduction that defines and describes the topic. Address what purpose the topic serves and how it impacts the delivery of healthcare in general and nursing care in particular.

Search for scholarly sources and relevant websites. Include a minimum of two scholarly sources. The course textbook does not qualify as a scholarly source. Cite all sources in the body of the paper and include them in the References list following proper APA formatting.

Provide one example of this topic. Describe the main features or aspects of the example with support from your sources. If you haven’t used this before, think of how this could benefit clinical practice.

Describe an experience where the topic impacted you personally, either when you were receiving healthcare or when you were providing nursing care. Relate one positive aspect or one negative aspect of this experience and how it could have been improved. If you haven’t used this before, think of how this could benefit clinical practice.

Write a conclusion that summarizes the topic, the purpose, and how your newfound insight will influence your nursing care.

Use the APA template above to develop your paper. Use APA formatting. Refer to the Publication manual of the APA, sixth edition. Review the various APA documents included in this course and the SSPRNBSN Student Success course that can help you with your writing. Take advantage of the tutoring services that are available to Chamberlain students for free.

The length of the paper should be a maximum of 4-5 pages, excluding the title page and the reference page. There should only be one small quote maximum in the paper. Citations should primarily include summary and restatement.

**Academic Integrity Reminder**

College values honesty and integrity. All students should be aware of the Academic Integrity policy and follow it in all discussions and assignments.

By submitting this assignment, I pledge on my honor that all content contained is my own original work except as quoted and cited appropriately. I have not received any unauthorized assistance on this assignment. Please see the grading criteria and rubrics on this page.

Please see the grading criteria and rubrics on this page.

NOTE: Please use your browser’s File setting to save or print this page.

Rubric

NR361 Information Systems Paper Sept 18

NR361 Information Systems Paper Sept 18

Criteria  RatingsPts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Introduction

Define and describe the topic, its purpose, and its impact on healthcare and nursing care.

25.0 pts

Introduces and describes the topic in depth, its purpose, and its impact on healthcare and nursing care.

22.0 pts

Introduces and describes the topic in fair depth and detail, its purpose, and its impact on healthcare and nursing care.

20.0 pts

Introduces and briefly describes the topic, and its impact on healthcare or nursing care.

10.0 pts

Does not adequately introduce or describe the topic, or minimally describes impact on healthcare or nursing care.

0.0 pts

Does not introduce or describe the topic, and/or does not describe impact on healthcare or nursing care.

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Topic Examples

Provide one example of your topic. Describe the main features or aspects of the example.

50.0 pts

Provides one outstanding example that exemplifies your topic. Describes the main features or aspects of the example in depth.

44.0 pts

Provides one appropriate example that relate to your topic. Describes the main features or aspects of the example in some detail.

40.0 pts

Provides one example that relates to your topic. Describes the main features or aspects of the example briefly.

19.0 pts

Provides one correct example but inaccurately describes the example.

0.0 pts

Does not provide an example.

50.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Personal Experience

Describe a personal or work-related experience with the topic. Relate one positive or one negative aspect of this experience, and how it could have been improved.

50.0 pts

Describes a personal or work-related experience that is an excellent example of the topic. Relates one positive or one negative aspect of this experience, and how it could have been improved.

44.0 pts

Describes a personal or work-related experience that generally relates to the topic. Relates one positive or one negative aspect of this experience, and how it could have been improved.

40.0 pts

Describes a personal or work-related experience that somewhat relates to the topic. Relates one positive OR one negative aspect of this experience, but does not describe how it could have been improved.

19.0 pts

Minimally describes an experience that generally relates to the topic. Fails to describe positive or negative aspects of this experience or how it could be improved.

0.0 pts

Fails to describe, an experience, or describes one that does NOT relate to the topic.

50.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Conclusion

Write a conclusion that summarizes the topic, purpose and how your newfound insight will influence your nursing care.

25.0 pts

Clearly summarizes the topic including its definition, purpose and how what you have learned will influence your nursing care.

22.0 pts

Summarizes the topic including its definition, purpose, and how what you have learned will influence your nursing care.

20.0 pts

Fairly summarizes the topic including its definition, purpose, and how what you have learned affects your nursing care in the future.

10.0 pts

Minimally summarizes the topic but fails to include its definition, purpose, OR what you have learned that will influence your future nursing care.

0.0 pts

Fails to summarize the topic. Omits the definition, and impact on your nursing care.

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Supporting Evidence

Locate, cite, and reference a minimum of two relevant scholarly sources of evidence that indicate an information search has been conducted. The textbook does not qualify as a scholarly source. One scholarly source must be a peer-reviewed journal article.

25.0 pts

Locates, cites, and references a minimum of TWO relevant scholarly sources of evidence that indicate an information search has been conducted. The textbook is not a scholarly source. One source must be a peer-reviewed journal article.

22.0 pts

Locates, cites, and references a minimum of TWO relevant scholarly sources of evidence that indicate an information search has been conducted. The textbook is not a scholarly source.

20.0 pts

Locates, cites, and references a minimum of ONE relevant scholarly source and the textbook as evidence that indicates an information search has been conducted.

10.0 pts

Locates, cites and references only ONE relevant source of evidence that indicates an information search has been conducted. The source is not necessarily scholarly.

0.0 pts

Fails to locate relevant sources, or there is no indication that an information search has been conducted.

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Scholarly Writing and APA Format

• Title page, running head, and page numbers. • Include an introduction, body, and conclusion/ recommendations sections (Level 1 headings) that are clearly labeled. There is a logical flow. • Page count met of 4-5 pages maximum, excluding the title page and reference page. • Only one small quote maximum was included. Uses summary and restatement primarily for citations. • Grammar, punctuation, paragraphing, and sentence structure are correct. • Body of the paper includes properly formatted in-text citations, and the reference page includes properly referenced sources that were cited in the paper in APA format. • Evidence of spelling and grammar check.

25.0 pts

Title page, running head, and page numbers; Sections include an introduction, topic examples, personal experience, and conclusion; Level 1 headings used appropriately; Each section has at least three sentences; Grammar, punctuation, paragraphing, and sentence structure are correct; Citations throughout demonstrate support of student’s ideas and opinions; Reference page includes all sources and no errors in format; Meets page requirements 4-5 page maximum, excluding title and reference pages; Only has one small quote in the paper. Uses summary and restatement primarily for citations; Evidence of spell and grammar check.

22.0 pts

Minimal error in APA title page, running head, or page numbers noted; Sections include an introduction, topic examples, personal experience, and conclusion. Level 1 headings may or may not be used appropriately; Minimal errors in grammar, spelling, paragraphing, punctuation, and/or sentence structure noted; Citations are present but not in correct format; References are present, with minimal errors in format; Meets page requirements 4-5 page maximum, excluding title and reference pages; Only has one small quote in the paper. Uses summary and restatement primarily for citations.

20.0 pts

Some errors in APA title page, running head, and/or page numbers noted; Sections indicated, but level 1 headings not used; Some errors in grammar, paragraphing, spelling, punctuation, and/or sentence structure noted; Citations are present but not in correct format; References are present, with some errors in format; Does not meet page requirement for assignment; Some indication of errors within document; Has one-two small quotes in the paper. Uses summary and restatement primarily for citations.

10.0 pts

Multiple errors in APA formatting; Multiple grammar, spelling, paragraphing, and punctuation errors noted; Citations are incorrectly formatted; References are incorrectly formatted; Little evidence of proofreading prior to submitting paper; Does not meet page requirements; Uses more than two quotes in the paper. Does not meet guidelines.

0.0 pts

Many errors in APA formatting; Many grammar, spelling, paragraphing, and punctuation errors noted; Citations are missing; References are missing; No sign of proofreading prior to submitting paper.

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Wrong Topic

0.0 pts

0 points deducted

Correct topic used. 0 points deducted

0.0 pts

20 points (10% ) lost

Incorrect topic used results in a 20 point (10%) deduction. 20 points deducted

0.0 pts

Total Points: 200.0

Previous Next

Write a 3–5 page safety score improvement plan for mitigating concerns, addressing a specific patient-safety goal that is relevant to quality patient care. Determine what a best evidence-based prac

Write a 3–5 page safety score improvement plan for mitigating concerns, addressing a specific patient-safety goal that is relevant to quality patient care. 

Determine what a best evidence-based practice is and design a plan for resolving issues resulting from not maintaining patient safety.

Quality improvement and patient safety are health care industry imperatives (Institute of Medicine’s Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, 2001). Effective quality improvement results in system and organizational change. This ultimately contributes to the creation of a patient safety culture.

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:

• Competency 2: Apply systems theory and systems thinking to facilitate health care delivery and patient outcomes.       
  • (IMPORTANT) Apply systems thinking to explain how current policies and procedures may affect an identified safety issue.
  • (IMPORTANT) Explain an evidence-based strategy to collect information about, and improve, an identified safety concern. 
  • (IMPORTANT) Explain a plan to implement a recommendation and monitor outcomes.
• Competency 4: Evaluate how power relates to health care organizational structure, behavior, and leadership.       
  • 9IMPORTANT) Describe the influence of nursing leadership in driving needed changes.
• Competency 5: Communicate in a manner that is consistent with the expectations of a nursing professional.       
  • (IMPORTANT) Write content clearly and logically, with correct use of grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and current APA style.

This is what need to be covered, resumed:

-Explain an evidence-based strategy to collect information about, and improve, an identified safety concern.

-Apply systems thinking to explain how current policies and procedures may affect an identified safety issue.  

-Explain a plan to implement a recommendation and monitor outcomes.  

-Describe the influence of nursing leadership in driving needed changes.

-Write content clearly and logically, with correct use of grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and current APA style.

Preparation

Refer to the Capella library and the Internet for supplemental resources to help you complete this assessment, a safety score improvement plan.

Consider the hospital-acquired conditions that are not reimbursed for under Medicare/Medicaid. Among these conditions are specific safety issues such as infections, falls, medication errors, and other safety concerns that could have been prevented or alleviated with the use of evidence-based guidelines. 

Hospital Safety Score, an independent nonprofit organization, uses national performance measures to determine the safety score for hospitals in the United States. The Hospital Safety Score Web site and other online resources provide hospital safety scores to the public.

Read the scenario below:Scenario As the manager of a unit, you have been advised by the patient safety office of an alarming increase in the hospital safety score for your unit. This is a very serious public relations matter because patient safety data is public information. It is also a financial crisis because the organization stands to lose a significant amount of reimbursement money from Medicare and Medicaid unless the source of the problem can be identified and corrected. You are required to submit a safety score improvement plan to the organization’s leadership and the patient safety office. 

Select a specific patient safety goal that has been identified by an organization, or one that is widely regarded in the nursing profession as relevant to quality patient care delivery, such as patient falls, infection rates, catheter-induced urinary infections, IV infections, et cetera.

Deliverable: Safety Score Improvement Plan

Develop a 3–5 page safety score improvement plan.

• Identify the health care setting and nursing unit of your choice in the title of the mitigation plan. For example, “Safety Score Improvement Plan for XYZ Rehabilitation Center.”
• You may choose to use information on a patient safety issue for the organization in which you currently work, or search for information from a setting you are familiar with, perhaps from your clinical work.      
  • Demonstrate systems theory and systems thinking as you develop your recommendations.

Organize your report with these headings:

Study of Factors

• Identify a patient safety issue.
• Describe the influence of nursing leadership in driving the needed changes.
• Apply systems thinking to explain how current policies and procedures may affect a safety issue.

Recommendations

1. Recommend an evidence-based strategy to improve the safety issue.
2. Explain a strategy to collect information about the safety concern.      
   • How would you determine the sources of the problem?
3. Explain a plan to implement a recommendation and monitor outcomes.      
   • What quality indicators will you use?
   • How will you monitor outcomes?
   • Will policies or procedures need to be changed?
   • Will nursing staff need training?
   • What tools will you need to do this?

Additional Requirements

• Written communication: Written communication should be free of errors that detract from the overall message.
• APA formatting: Resources and in-text citations should be formatted according to current APA style and formatting.
• Length: The plan should be 3–5 pages.
• Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point, double-spaced.
• Number of resources: Use a minimum of three peer-reviewed resources.

When you wake in the morning, you may reach for your cell phone to reply to a few text or email messages that you missed overnight. On your drive to work, you may stop to refuel your car. Upon your ar

When you wake in the morning, you may reach for your cell phone to reply to a few text or email messages that you missed overnight. On your drive to work, you may stop to refuel your car. Upon your arrival, you might swipe a key card at the door to gain entrance to the facility. And before finally reaching your workstation, you may stop by the cafeteria to purchase a coffee. 

From the moment you wake, you are in fact a data-generation machine. Each use of your phone, every transaction you make using a debit or credit card, even your entrance to your place of work, creates data. It begs the question: How much data do you generate each day? Many studies have been conducted on this, and the numbers are staggering: Estimates suggest that nearly 1 million bytes of data are generated every second for every person on earth.

As the volume of data increases, information professionals have looked for ways to use big data—large, complex sets of data that require specialized approaches to use effectively. Big data has the potential for significant rewards—and significant risks—to healthcare. In this Discussion, you will consider these risks and rewards.

To Prepare:

• Review the Resources and reflect on the web article Big Data Means Big Potential, Challenges for Nurse Execs. 
• Reflect on your own experience with complex health information access and management and consider potential challenges and risks you may have experienced or observed.

Threw, J (2016, April, 19)https://www.healthleadersmedia.com/nursing/big-data-means-big-potential-challenges-nurse-execs

McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. G. (2017). Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge (4th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

It has to be three resources:

• Chapter 25, “The Art of Caring in Technology-Laden Environments” (pp. 525–535)
• Chapter 26, “Nursing Informatics and the Foundation of Knowledge” (pp. 537–551)

Post a description of at least one potential benefit of using big data as part of a clinical system and explain why. Then, describe at least one potential challenge or risk of using big data as part of a clinical system and explain why. Propose at least one strategy you have experienced, observed, or researched that may effectively mitigate the challenges or risks of using big data you described. Be specific and provide examples.

Assignment:Identify an older adult age 65 +, use a 1st and last initial. Execute a therapeutic assessment interview with them for at least two interview sessions assessing their self-identified:Demogr

Assignment:

Identify an older adult age 65 +, use a 1st and last initial. Execute a therapeutic assessment interview with them for at least two interview sessions assessing their self-identified:

• Demographics, life time education and career/employment

• Two most significant (positive) times in their lives
• What past hardship or loss has the client successfully negotiated in the past?
• Two personal strengths
• Engage them in identifying what is healthy versus non-healthy coping skills
  • Inquire of 2 healthy coping skills they have used in the past and/or now
• Three (3) pieces of advice they would give to their younger self if they could?
• Support the client in taking the Geriatric Depression Scale.pdf
• Support the client in taking the Fulmer SPICES Assessment.pdf
• Perform a Mini Mental State Exam.pdf and Patient_Stress_Questionnaire.pdf (attach here)
• Perform a Hall, Hall, and Chapman Article.pdf
• Report the findings from the Geriatric Depression Scale, Fulmer Spices, Patient stress questionnaire and the mini mental status exam
• Discuss your older adult’s level of ego integrity vs. despair as described by psychoanalyst Erik Erikson. If you had to rate them on a scale of 1-10, with 1 representing a full state of despair and 10 representing full ego integrity, what rating would you give your older adult?
• Describe at least two nursing diagnoses for this client.  
• Create a plan of care for the client to include at least three nursing goals with two nursing interventions each.

ASSIGNMENT1 W2

Use the practice problem and a qualitative, peer-reviewed research article you identified in the Topic 1 assignment to complete this assignment.

In a 1000-1,250 word essay, summarize the study, explain the ways in which the findings might be used in nursing practice, and address ethical considerations associated with the conduct of the study.

Refer to the resource “Research Critique Guidelines” for suggested headings and content for your paper.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

Research Critique Guidelines

To write a critical appraisal that demonstrates comprehension of the research study conducted, address each component below for qualitative study in the Topic 2 assignment and the quantitative study in the Topic 3 assignment.

Successful completion of this assignment requires that you provide a rationale, include examples, or reference content from the study in your responses.

Qualitative Study

Background of Study:

·         Identify the clinical problem and research problem that led to the study. What was not known about the clinical problem that, if understood, could be used to improve health care delivery or patient outcomes? This gap in knowledge is the research problem.

·         How did the author establish the significance of the study? In other words, why should the reader care about this study? Look for statements about human suffering, costs of treatment, or the number of people affected by the clinical problem.

·         Identify the purpose of the study. An author may clearly state the purpose of the study or may describe the purpose as the study goals, objectives, or aims.

·         List research questions that the study was designed to answer. If the author does not explicitly provide the questions, attempt to infer the questions from the answers.

·         Were the purpose and research questions related to the problem?

Method of Study:

·         Were qualitative methods appropriate to answer the research questions?

·         Did the author identify a specific perspective from which the study was developed? If so, what was it?

·         Did the author cite quantitative and qualitative studies relevant to the focus of the study? What other types of literature did the author include?

·         Are the references current? For qualitative studies, the author may have included studies older than the 5-year limit typically used for quantitative studies. Findings of older qualitative studies may be relevant to a qualitative study.

·         Did the author evaluate or indicate the weaknesses of the available studies?

·         Did the literature review include adequate information to build a logical argument?

·         When a researcher uses the grounded theory method of qualitative inquiry, the researcher may develop a framework or diagram as part of the findings of the study. Was a framework developed from the study findings?

Results of Study

·         What were the study findings?

·         What are the implications to nursing?

·         Explain how the findings contribute to nursing knowledge/science. Would this impact practice, education, administration, or all areas of nursing?

Ethical Considerations

·         Was the study approved by an Institutional Review Board?

·         Was patient privacy protected?

·         Were there ethical considerations regarding the treatment or lack of?

Conclusion

·         Emphasize the importance and congruity of the thesis statement.

·         Provide a logical wrap-up to bring the appraisal to completion and to leave a lasting impression and take-away points useful in nursing practice.

·         Incorporate a critical appraisal and a brief analysis of the utility and applicability of the findings to nursing practice.

·         Integrate a summary of the knowledge learned.

Quantitative Study

Background of Study:

·         Identify the clinical problem and research problem that led to the study. What was not known about the clinical problem that, if understood, could be used to improve health care delivery or patient outcomes? This gap in knowledge is the research problem.

·         How did the author establish the significance of the study? In other words, why should the reader care about this study? Look for statements about human suffering, costs of treatment, or the number of people affected by the clinical problem.

·         Identify the purpose of the study. An author may clearly state the purpose of the study or may describe the purpose as the study goals, objectives, or aims.

·         List research questions that the study was designed to answer. If the author does not explicitly provide the questions, attempt to infer the questions from the answers.

·         Were the purpose and research questions related to the problem?

 Methods of Study

·         Identify the benefits and risks of participation addressed by the authors. Were there benefits or risks the authors do not identify?

·         Was informed consent obtained from the subjects or participants?

·         Did it seem that the subjects participated voluntarily in the study?

·         Was institutional review board approval obtained from the agency in which the study was conducted?

·         Are the major variables (independent and dependent variables) identified and defined? What were these variables?

·         How were data collected in this study?

·         What rationale did the author provide for using this data collection method?

·         Identify the time period for data collection of the study.

·         Describe the sequence of data collection events for a participant.

·         Describe the data management and analysis methods used in the study.

·         Did the author discuss how the rigor of the process was assured? For example, does the author describe maintaining a paper trail of critical decisions that were made during the analysis of the data? Was statistical software used to ensure accuracy of the analysis?

·         What measures were used to minimize the effects of researcher bias (their experiences and perspectives)? For example, did two researchers independently analyze the data and compare their analyses?

 Results of Study

·         What is the researcher’s interpretation of findings?

·         Are the findings valid or an accurate reflection of reality? Do you have confidence in the findings?

·         What limitations of the study were identified by researchers?

·         Was there a coherent logic to the presentation of findings?

·         What implications do the findings have for nursing practice? For example, can the findings of the study be applied to general nursing practice, to a specific population, or to a specific area of nursing?

·         What suggestions are made for further studies?

Ethical Considerations

·         Was the study approved by an Institutional Review Board?

·         Was patient privacy protected?

·         Were there ethical considerations regarding the treatment or lack of?

Conclusion

·         Emphasize the importance and congruity of the thesis statement.

·         Provide a logical wrap-up to bring the appraisal to completion and to leave a lasting impression and take-away points useful in nursing practice.

·         Incorporate a critical appraisal and a brief analysis of the utility and applicability of the findings to nursing practice.

·         Integrate a summary of the knowledge learned.

Reference

Burns, N., & Grove, S. (2011). Understanding nursing research (5th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.

RUBRICS

Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations

THIS IS THE ASSIGNMENT FOR THIS WEEK, PLEASE BE CAREFUL YOU ALREADY KNOW ABOUT THE PAIN IN THE NECK.