Present a Manage Care Control Cost Plan: Under traditional indemnity insurance, assignment help

Question Description

generate, designate, Organize, investigate and, present a Manage Care Control Cost Plan: Under traditional indemnity insurance, the money follows the patient. Patients select health care providers and visit them as they choose. Providers then bill the private insurer or public payer and are reimbursed on a fee-for-service or per case basis

Introduction (30%) Provide a short-lived outline of the meaning (not a description) of Chapter 9 and 10 and articles you read, in your own words. Types and classifications of managed care models.

2. Manage Care Control Cost Plan: (50%)

a. Cost savings

‘‘Structural changes centered around the expansion of managed care have been the major transformative force in health markets in recent years and have played a major role in restraining growth in health spending’’

b. Provider reimbursement

This complaint has two dimensions: hospital profitability, and physician compensation. As far as hospitals are concerned, administrators are worried about profitability or surplus for reinvestment, and consumers are worried about the threat of hospital closures. Few things stir as much public outcry as the prospect of closing a community hospital.

c. Quality of care

Much recent legislation and many legal reforms havebeen aimed at preventing managed care’s perceivedquality abuses. The Patient Bill of Rights, which hasbeen heavily debated in Congress, defines, amongother things, the rights of consumers with complexconditions to access directly a qualified specialist,continuity of provider for patients who are underregular treatment, and self-referral to certain types ofspecialists.

3. Conclusion (20%)

Quickly recapitulate your thoughts & statement to your critique of the articles and Chapter you read.  How did these articles and Chapters impact your thoughts about Manage Care? What did you learn about manage care and how you will apply all these knowledge?

Evaluation will be based on how clearly you respond to the above, in particular:

a) The precision with which you analyses the articles;

b) The complexity, possibility, and organization of your paper; and,

c) Your conclusions, including a description of the impact of these articles and Chapters on any Health Care Setting.

Comparing and Contrasting Qualitative Approaches

Question Description

In this Discussion, you will conduct a literature review of your topic area, focusing on a research study that uses one of the qualitative approaches covered this week.

To prepare for this Discussion:

  • Review the reading materials about the different approaches in this week’s Learning Resources.
  • Conduct your own literature search to find a published study that represents one of the Week 3 approaches. Remember, you may have to broaden your search terms to find an appropriate study.
  • Review the following resources before proceeding with your own article review

Document: R8360 Guidelines for Reading and Evaluating Qualitative Research Articles (PDF)

Document: Example of How to Read and Evaluate a Qualitative Research Article (PDF)

**************************************************

My Topic: What are the specific problems and characteristic of different types of offender Reentry Programs Targeting Recidivism in the United States? (Please find an article on this topic to evaluate)

Contribute a 3-paragraph Discussion post in which you respond to the following:

  • Summarize the characteristics of the approach of the research article you chose during your literature search.
  • Summarize the research article, including the citation and sufficient information for your classmates and Instructor to locate the article.
  • Present a short critique of that article based on the “R8360 Guidelines for Reading and Evaluating Qualitative Research Articles” document.

*Locate and review two of the articles a classmate critiqued. Then, review the critique itself. Respond to your classmate and provide constructive feedback on his or her critique.

Create an Care Plan and follow the NURSING CARE PLAN

Question Description

Create an Care Plan and follow the NURSING CARE PLAN RUBRIC instructions.

Patient information:

Patient female 48 years old

Admission Diagnosis: Stroke non-hemorrhagic, deficit right sided, speech

History: High cholesterol 350

Diabetes – blood glucose 320

Hypertension

Depression

Patient admitted after stroke, patient was at home complains with right sided weakness called 911 brought to hospital where she was diagnostic with stroke.

Patient is married has two child, husband is god (catholic)

Physical Assessment 5-6

1- lung sounds

2- bowel sounds

3- skin

4- upper extremities (right sided 0/5)

5- lower extremities (right sided 2/5)

Diagnose: CT of the brain _Lab glucose_Hemoglobin_CBC

Medications: Crestor, Coreg, Insuline Novolog and Cymbalta

Here are the care plan rubric instruction, care plan example and care plan template please follow the instructions

Question Description

In this unit, you have explored the role of the master’s prepared nurse specific to nursing administration. Based on the unit content and readings, please explain the following:

  • What “myths” about nursing administration did you have prior to this unit? Or, did the content of this unit support what you already knew about nursing administration?
  • How has the information contained in this unit impacted your perceptions of your nurse administrator (this could refer to your immediate supervisor or a more senior nurse administrator in your organization)?

Qualitative Research Approaches Matrix

Question Description

In order for you to select the qualitative research approach that best fits your research question, you will need to develop a deeper familiarity with the approaches available to you. This week’s Assignment is the first of a two-part activity designed to broaden and deepen your base of knowledge of qualitative research approaches. While the activity does not encompass all possible approaches, it does allow you to explore the eight most common approaches you are likely to encounter and may wish to consider for yourself.

For this Assignment, you will complete the first half of the Qualitative Research Approaches Matrix Template, which is designed to allow you to compare and contrast qualitative research approaches.

To prepare for this Assignment:

  • Review this week’s readings, focusing on the differences among the following four types of qualitative research approaches:
    • Generic qualitative inquiry
    • Qualitative case study
    • Grounded theory and realism
    • Phenomenology and heuristic inquiry
  • Locate the Qualitative Research Approaches Matrix Template in this week’s Learning Resources.
  • Read the examples of research studies provided in this week’s Learning Resources.
  • Select additional readings that focus on specific approaches (some suggestions have been provided for you in the Optional Resources).

Preventing Catheter Associated UTIs

Question Description

South University NSG 6101

I will upload work from previous weeks to give you a foundation to build on. Please pay close attention to instructions and FOLLOW APA GUIDELINES.

Week 4: Week 4 – W4 Assignment 2

Assignment 2: Research Proposal DraftBy Monday, December 12, 2016, write a (5–6 pages) paper addressing the sections below of the research proposal.This week you will submit the Literature Review section of your proposal. Each week you have been adding to your growing body of evidence to support your problem and proposed innovation to address the problem. The review of literature is a critical, analytical summary and synthesis of the current knowledge of your research topic. Thus it should compare and relate different theories, findings, etc., rather than just summarize them individually.The following resources will help guide you (in addition to our course textbooks):http://writing.wisc.edu/Handbook/ReviewofLiterature.htmlhttp://www.duluth.umn.edu/~hrallis/guides/researching/litreview.htmlhttp://writingcenter.unc.edu/handouts/literature-reviews/Writing the Literature Review: Step-by-Step Tutorial for Graduate Students: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2IUZWZX4OGIWriting the Literature Review (Part Two): Step-by-Step Tutorial for Graduate Students: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UoYpyY9n9YQSubmit your assignment to the W4: Assignment 2 Dropbox by Monday, December 12, 2016.Assignment 2 Grading CriteriaMaximum PointsLiterature reviewed represents current scholarly literature.5Literature reviewed represents a comprehensive review of the research topic.5Review of the literature is a critical, analytical summary.5Review of the literature illustrates a synthesis of the current knowledge of research topic.10Followed APA guidelines for writing style, spelling and grammar, and citation of sources.5Total:30

Career Exploration Paper

Question Description

I need a paper with these guidelines in the nursing field. It has to be 4 pages with a works cited following these guidelines exactly please.

ACA 122

Midterm Project: Career Exploration Paper

In this essay, you will research a career field that you are already in or that you are interested in entering. You will write an essay about that career field that answers the following questions in thorough detail with specific examples and statistics:

  1. What is the nature of the work in this field? What are the working conditions like?
  2. What are the educational requirements to enter this field? Is further study required beyond a four-year degree? If so, what are the requirements to be admitted into a particular graduate program? What schools offer the graduate degree you prefer?
  3. What is the earnings potential? (Include specific figures and statistics.)
  4. What does the future look like for your particular career?

Papers must:

  • be 3-4 pages long (not counting title page or Works Cited page)
  • be typed
  • be formatted correctly:
    • 1” margins
    • 12 point Times New Roman font
    • double-spaced
  • include information from at least three outside sources, with proper citation (in-text citations and Works Cited page)
  • be your own original work and writing.
  • Cite any information you use from an outside source, whether you use direct quotes or not. If you use direct quotes from one of your sources, be sure to put that information in quotation marks. If you do not follow these guidelines, the assignment will be considered plagiarized and you will receive an F.

Possible sources:

Occupational Outlook Handbook — www.bls.gov/oco/

http://online.onetcenter.org/

NCLive

Book or online sources of your choosing

THIS ASSIGNMENT IS WORTH 30% OF YOUR COURSE GRADE

explore the various meanings behind one concept in the field of nursing.

Question Description

The purpose of this Assignment is to explore the various meanings behind one concept in the field of nursing. It is important to understand that while professionals from various fields will use the same word, they often carry very different meanings. Likewise, it is important for every health professional to be able to explain the meaning/use/interpretation of a term to patients in a way that they can understand. To complete this Assignment, you will explore the various definitions of a single word (concept) and compile a detailed description of theses definitions and interpretations of that word.

To begin, select a word (concept) familiar to you in health care that has multiple interpretations and uses, e.g., heart. The heart is an organ, a muscle, a control center, a source of emotion, etc. Examples to choose from include, but are not limited to:

failerrordeathinnovationquality

teamsoulspiritresearchevidence

lonelinesshardinessstressgriefcare

rehabilitationtrauma  

Feel free to be creative in your choice of terms. You will provide a description of uses, definitions, and varied interpretations of the term using a variety of multiple academic disciplines outside the discipline of nursing. Academic disciplines to choose from include, but are not limited to:

sociologyanthropology

psychologypolitical science

economicscomputer science

religioneducation

philosophybusiness

Uses, definitions, and interpretations will be obtained from primary and secondary sources or reliable web sources recognized as credible and authoritative (not dictionaries or Wikipedia). Sources to choose from include, but are not limited to:

periodicalsbooks

government websitesprofessional associations

universitiescredible/authoritative websites

Directions:

Identify the concept and purpose for studying the concept and relevance to nursing practice.

Conduct a preliminary literature review to identify multiple uses of the concept.

Describe the various usages of the term.

Determine the critical attributes of the concept.

Create a theoretical and operational definition of the concept.Use at least 3 references.APA format

evaluate an issue and consider how you could act as a moral agent or advocate, facilitating the resolution of the issue for a positive outcome.

Question Description

3 REFERENCES PLEASE!!!!!!

For this Assignment, you evaluate an issue and consider how you could act as a moral agent or advocate, facilitating the resolution of the issue for a positive outcome.

To prepare:

  • Consider the examples of leadership demonstrated in this week’s media presentation and the other Learning Resources.
  • To further your self-knowledge, you are required to complete the Kiersey Temperament as indicated in this week’s Learning Resources. Consider your leadership style, including your strengths for leading others and include your results from Kiersey Temperament Sorter to describe potential challenges related to your leadership style.
  • Mentally survey your work environment, or one with which you are familiar, and identify a timely issue/dilemma that requires you to perform the leadership role of moral agent or advocate to improve a situation (e.g., speaking or acting on behalf of a vulnerable patient, the need for appropriate staffing, a colleague being treated unfairly).
  • What ethical, moral, or legal skills, dispositions, and/or strategies would help you resolve this dilemma? Define the differences between ethical, moral, and legal leadership.
  • Finally, consider the values and principles that guide the nursing profession; the organization’s mission, vision, and values; the leadership and management competencies addressed in this course; and your own values and reasons for entering the profession. What motivation do you see for taking a stand on an important issue even when it is difficult to do so?

To complete:

BY DAY 7

Write a 4 to 5 page paper (page count does not include title and reference page) that addresses the following:

  • Introduce the conceptual frameworks of the ethical constructs of ethics, moral, or legal standards and the purpose of the paper.
  • Consider an ethical, moral, or legal dilemma that you have encountered in your work environment and describe it.
  • Analyze the moral, ethical, and legal implications utilized in this situation. Describe your role as a moral agent or advocate for this specific issue.
  • Consider your leadership styles identified by your self-assessment and determine if they act as a barrier or facilitation during this dilemma.

The School of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The Sample Paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements.

Nurses Cultural Background And Impact On Care

Question Description

Textbooks:

Transcultural Concepts in Nursing Care, Joyceen S. Boyle & Margaret M. Andrews. (2015), 7th edition.

Overview

This week, you will consider your own diverse cultural and generational background and how it impacts the care you provide to your patients.

For this written assessment we will focus on generational diversity in the nursing population. Review table 12.2 on p. 379 of your textbook and address the following:

  1. Define and describe the four generations – name, timeframe, and a description of that group’s characteristics.
  2. Choose the group to which you belong. Explain how you think that you fit with this assessment of that generation.
  3. Select any other group to which you do not belong. Explain how those from your group can learn from that group, and explain how that group could learn from yours.

References

Minimum of four (4) total references: two (2) references from required course materials and two (2) peer-reviewed references. All references must be no older than five years (unless making a specific point using a seminal piece of information)

Peer-reviewed references include references from professional data bases such as PubMed or CINHAL applicable to population and practice area, along with evidence based clinical practice guidelines. Examples of unacceptable references are Wikipedia, UpToDate, Epocrates, Medscape, WebMD, hospital organizations, insurance recommendations, & secondary clinical databases.

Style

Unless otherwise specified, all the written assignment must follow APA 6th edition formatting, citations and references. Click here to download the Microsoft Word APA 6th edition template. Make sure you cross-reference the APA 6th edition book as well before submitting the assignment.

Number of Pages/Words

Unless otherwise specified all papers should have a minimum of 600 words (approximately 2.5 pages) excluding the title and reference pages

bedside reporting on patients

Question Description

Details:

Topic is bedside reporting on patients

While the implementation plan prepares students to apply their research to the problem or issue they have identified for their capstone change proposal project, the literature review enables students to map out and move into the active planning and development stages of the project.

A literature review analyzes how current research supports the PICOT, as well as identifies what is known and what is not known in the evidence. Students will use the information from the earlier PICOT Statement Paper and Literature Evaluation Table assignments to develop a 750-1,000 word review that includes the following sections:

1. Title page

2. Introduction section

3. A comparison of research questions

4. A comparison of sample populations

5. A comparison of the limitations of the study

6. A conclusion section, incorporating recommendations for further research

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

Please Note: Assignment will not be submitted to the faculty member until the “Submit” button under “Final Submission” is clicked.

New Attempt

Title Attached Documents Turnitin Report Similarity Index Final Submission

Click ‘New Attempt’ to start assignment or attach documents

Literature Review

1

Unsatisfactory

0.00% 2

Less than Satisfactory

75.00% 3

Satisfactory

79.00% 4

Good

89.00% 5

Excellent

100.00%

80.0 %Content

10.0 %Introduction An introduction is not present. An introduction is present, but it does not relate to the body of the paper. An introduction is present, and it relates to the body of the paper. There is nothing in the introduction to entice the reader to continue reading. An introduction is present, and it relates to the body of the paper. Information presented in the introduction provides incentive for the reader to continue reading. An introduction is present, and it relates to the body of the paper. Information presented in the introduction is intriguing and encourages the reader to continue reading.

20.0 %Comparison of Research Questions No comparison of research questions is presented. A comparison of research questions is presented, but it is not valid. A cursory though valid comparison of research questions is presented. A moderately thorough and valid comparison of research questions is presented. A reflective and insightful comparison of research questions is presented.

20.0 %Comparison of Sample Populations No comparison of sample populations is presented. A comparison of sample populations is presented, but it is not valid. A cursory though valid comparison of sample populations is presented. A moderately thorough and valid comparison of sample populations is presented. A reflective and insightful comparison of sample populations is presented.

20.0 %Comparison of the Limitations of the Study No comparison of the limitations of the study is presented. A comparison of the limitations of the study is presented, but it is not valid. A cursory though valid comparison of the limitations of the study is presented. A moderately thorough and valid comparison of the limitations of the study is presented. A reflective and insightful comparison of the limitations of the study is presented.

10.0 %Conclusion and Recommendations for Further Research No conclusion and recommendations for further research are presented. A conclusion and recommendations for further research are presented, but they are not valid. A conclusion and recommendations for further research are valid, but they are cursory. A conclusion and recommendations for further research are valid and moderately thorough. A conclusion and recommendations for further research are reflective and insightful.

15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

5.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

5.0 %Argument Logic and Construction Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

5.0 %Format

2.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.

3.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

100 %Total Weightage