Renaissance And Baroque Sculpture In Italy

/in /by

Renaissance And Baroque Sculpture In Italy

Renaissance and Baroque Sculpture in Italy

The biblical hero David was a popular subject for sculpture and painting throughout the Renaissance and into the Baroque period. By studying, comparing, and contrasting sculptures of David created in the fifteenth, sixteenth, and seventeenth centuries, you can begin to see the stylistic changes that occurred across these centuries. In a minimum of 3 well-developed paragraphs, compare and contrast the following 3 sculptures of David:

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

  1. Early Renaissance: Donatello. David. 1446-1460.
  2. High Renaissance: Michelangelo. David. 1501-1504.
  3. Baroque. Gianlorenzo Bernini. David. 1623.

In your comparison, discuss:

  • What specific visual similarities do you observe in these three sculptures?
  • What specific differences do you see? Consider the representation of the figure, additional objects portrayed, and the role of the viewer for each sculpture
  • How has the attitude of David changed between these three representations? Renaissance And Baroque Sculpture In Italy
  • How is each sculpture representative of the time period and style in which it was created?

Be sure to explain your ideas clearly and support them by discussing specific works of art that you have read about this week, talking about how they illustrate and support your ideas.

Question 2: Dutch Baroque Painting

As we learned this week, Dutch Baroque art showed the influence of Protestantism and the middle-class merchants and traders who served as patrons. Dutch Baroque artists created portraits, still lifes, landscapes, and genre scenes of domestic life.

In a minimum of 2 well developed paragraphs, discuss how the following paintings reflect the social and historical context of sixteenth-century Holland. Consider the influence of religion, commerce, social structure, and/or patrons of the art in your response. Offer specific examples of how the subject of each painting reflects the society and culture in which it was created.

  1. Frans Hals, The Women Regents of the Old Men’s Home at Haarlem, c. 1664
  2. Rembrandt van Rijn, The Anatomy Lesson of Dr. Tulp, 1632
  3. Johannes Vermeer, Woman Holding a Balance, c. 1664

Be sure to explain your ideas clearly and support them by discussing specific works of art that you have read about this week, talking about how they illustrate and support your ideas.

Respond to both questions as thoroughly as possible, making sure to use information from the readings and the lectures. All responses should be in complete sentence form, using proper spelling and grammar. Renaissance And Baroque Sculpture In Italy

Nursing homework help

/in /by

Nursing homework help

 

2-3 pages

3 or more scholarly References Turnitin report Nursing homework help

Assignment: Personal Leadership Philosophies

Many of us can think of leaders we have come to admire, be they historical figures, pillars of the industry we work in, or leaders we know personally. The leadership of individuals such as Abraham Lincoln and Margaret Thatcher has been studied and discussed repeatedly. However, you may have interacted with leaders you feel demonstrated equally competent leadership without ever having a book written about their approaches.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

What makes great leaders great? Every leader is different, of course, but one area of commonality is the leadership philosophy that great leaders develop and practice. A leadership philosophy is basically an attitude held by leaders that acts as a guiding principle for their behavior. While formal theories on leadership continue to evolve over time, great leaders seem to adhere to an overarching philosophy that steers their actions. Nursing homework help

What is your leadership philosophy? In this Assignment, you will explore what guides your own leadership.

To Prepare:

  • Identify two to three scholarly resources, in addition to this Module’s readings, that evaluate the impact of leadership behaviors in creating healthy work environments.
  • Reflect on the leadership behaviors presented in the three resources that you selected for review.
  • Reflect on your results of the CliftonStrengths Assessment*, and consider how the results relate to your leadership traits.

*not required to submit CliftonStrengths Assessment

The Assignment (2-3 pages):

Personal Leadership Philosophies

Develop and submit a personal leadership philosophy that reflects what you think are characteristics of a good leader. Use the scholarly resources on leadership you selected to support your philosophy statement. Your personal leadership philosophy should include the following:

  • A description of your core values.
  • A personal mission and vision statement.
  • An analysis of your CliftonStrengths Assessment summarizing the results of your profile
  • A description of two key behaviors that you wish to strengthen.
  • A development plan that explains how you plan to improve upon the two key behaviors you selected and an explanation of how you plan to achieve your personal vision. Be specific and provide examples.
  • Be sure to incorporate your colleagues’ feedback on your CliftonStrengths Assessment from this Module’s Discussion 2.

GALLUP CLIFTON STRENGHTS

Strengths Insight Guide

SURVEY COMPLETION DATE: 03-28-2022

DON CLIFTON

Father of Strengths Psychology and

Inventor of CliftonStrengths

73160795 (

Copyright © 2000, 2006-2012 Gallup, Inc. All rights reserved.

1

SURVEY COMPLETION DATE: 03-28-2022

Depending on the order of your themes and how you responded to the assessment, some of your themes

may share identical insight statements. If this occurs, the lower ranked theme will not display insight

statements to avoid duplication on your report.

Your Top 5 Themes

  1. Communication
  2. Connectedness
  3. Woo
  4. Consistency
  5. Positivity

73160795

Copyright © 2000, 2006-2012 Gallup, Inc. All rights reserved.

2

Communication

SHARED THEME DESCRIPTION

People who are especially talented in the Communication theme generally find it easy to put their thoughts

into words. They are good conversationalists and presenters.

YOUR PERSONALIZED STRENGTHS INSIGHTS

What makes you stand out?

By nature, you like to amuse people with your stories. Your stories probably provide people with pleasant

distractions from their daily routines, worries, and obligations. Because of your strengths, you sense you

have an ability to talk with people. You savor conversations in which ideas or feelings are freely

exchanged. When there is a lull, you can keep the dialogue alive by telling a story, introducing a new topic,

offering an illustration, making a comparison, or posing a question. Driven by your talents, you feel forlorn

— that is, miserable or deprived — when you are separated from someone who is dear to you. You yearn

to spend time with your friends. Their absence saddens you. Instinctively, you may easily find the right

words to express what you are thinking. Sometimes you offer explanations. Occasionally you discuss

ideas. Once in a while, you rely on examples, stories, or jokes to illustrate your main points. It’s very likely

that you periodically enjoy sharing ideas, exchanging information, or trading stories. During conversations,

you might be the person who simplifies complicated details. Maybe you help individuals better understand

intricate procedures, theories, regulations, or plans.

Questions

  1. As you read your personalized strengths insights, what words, phrases, or lines stand out to you?
  2. Out of all the talents in this insight, what would you like for others to see most in you?

73160795 (Jose Quezada)

Copyright © 2000, 2006-2012 Gallup, Inc. All rights reserved.

3

Connectedness

SHARED THEME DESCRIPTION

People who are especially talented in the Connectedness theme have faith in the links between all things.

They believe there are few coincidences and that almost every event has a reason.

YOUR PERSONALIZED STRENGTHS INSIGHTS

What makes you stand out?

Chances are good that you sense that you are inextricably linked to your teammates. You understand your

success depends on each one of them just as their individual success hinges on you. It’s very likely that

you frequently engage in laborious tasks. You yearn to dedicate yourself to worthy causes or noble

purposes. Fortifying the bonds between yourself, the people you know, or even those you will never meet

gives your life special meaning. Because of your strengths, you routinely isolate facts that link ideas,

events, or people. You are especially sensitive to how one person’s optimistic or negative thoughts can

affect the entire human family. This prompts you to pay close attention to what individuals and groups think

and do. By nature, you sense you are linked to all humanity. You contend that harming another human

being eventually harms you. Misusing the environment has personal consequences, you argue. This

perspective on life influences your thoughts, actions, decisions, or choices. Instinctively, you often are the

one who helps people understand how they are linked across time, distance, race, ethnicity, religion,

economic levels, languages, or cultures. You make it possible for individuals to work together. You aim to

break down barriers that separate them.

Questions

  1. As you read your personalized strengths insights, what words, phrases, or lines stand out to you?
  2. Out of all the talents in this insight, what would you like for others to see most in you?

73160795

Copyright © 2000, 2006-2012 Gallup, Inc. All rights reserved.

4

Woo

SHARED THEME DESCRIPTION

People who are especially talented in the Woo theme love the challenge of meeting new people and

winning them over. They derive satisfaction from breaking the ice and making a connection with another

person.

YOUR PERSONALIZED STRENGTHS INSIGHTS

What makes you stand out?

By nature, you are genuinely fond of your teammates. You can see the good in them more readily than

most people can. This explains why individuals like having you in their groups. Because of your strengths,

you prefer being with groups or individuals rather than spending time alone. This explains why you

routinely introduce yourself to outsiders or newcomers. You quickly begin searching for common interests

you can discuss. Driven by your talents, you are sometimes unreserved. Perhaps you share personal

information and stories with first-time acquaintances as easily as with old friends. Chances are good that

you enjoy befriending newcomers. This explains why you regularly step forward to introduce yourself to

new classmates, coworkers, teammates, or friends of your family. You usually ask questions that are

guaranteed to stimulate discussions with people you are meeting for the first time. Instinctively, you truly

enjoy engaging outsiders in conversations about their past accomplishments. Your approach allows

newcomers to describe what they have done extremely well. You often endear yourself to them by being

attentive.

Questions

  1. As you read your personalized strengths insights, what words, phrases, or lines stand out to you?
  2. Out of all the talents in this insight, what would you like for others to see most in you?

73160795

Copyright © 2000, 2006-2012 Gallup, Inc. All rights reserved.

5

Consistency

SHARED THEME DESCRIPTION

People who are especially talented in the Consistency theme are keenly aware of the need to treat people

the same. They try to treat everyone in the world with consistency by setting up clear rules and adhering to

them.

YOUR PERSONALIZED STRENGTHS INSIGHTS

What makes you stand out?

Chances are good that you are quite strong — that is, thoroughly talented, knowledgeable, and skilled — at

setting up processes that make it easier to perform repetitious activities and mundane tasks. You

appreciate individuals who regularly follow these procedures. You can become frustrated with mavericks —

that is, independent people who insist on doing things their own way. You have noticed that they often

create problems for others. Driven by your talents, you likely have a reputation for producing good results.

In nearly all scenarios, whether mundane or fascinating, you ensure your ongoing success by outlining

clear steps for each procedure, pinpointing precise deadlines, and continually monitoring your progress.

Because of your strengths, you may be happy to do exactly what is assigned to you, as long as you sense

that you are not being asked to carry more than your fair share of the workload. Checking those tasks off

your list may bring you much pleasure, and may help you get along with others who notice your close

attention to the work required of you. It’s very likely that you regularly establish rules or processes to

handle recurring activities as well as tedious tasks. You continually reinforce the fact that no one is exempt

from following standard operating procedures. Instinctively, you are known for establishing recurring

patterns such as processes and rules that make it easier for a group to reach its objectives in an efficient

and hassle-free manner. You usually include numerous details and step-by-step procedures to ensure

consistent results.

Questions

  1. As you read your personalized strengths insights, what words, phrases, or lines stand out to you?
  2. Out of all the talents in this insight, what would you like for others to see most in you?

73160795 ()

Copyright © 2000, 2006-2012 Gallup, Inc. All rights reserved.

6

Positivity

SHARED THEME DESCRIPTION

People who are especially talented in the Positivity theme have an enthusiasm that is contagious. They are

upbeat and can get others excited about what they are going to do.

YOUR PERSONALIZED STRENGTHS INSIGHTS

What makes you stand out?

It’s very likely that you inspire your teammates with words that bolster their confidence. You repeatedly

remind them they have the abilities needed to attain their goals. Chances are good that you impart

confidence to people by reinforcing the high regard you have for them as individuals. By nature, you are

comfortable complimenting individuals you know quite well. After discovering each one’s preferences, you

can tailor your recognition to fit the person and the situation. You tend to lavish praise on people. You

make sure what you say and do pleases rather than embarrasses them. You want the experience to be a

good one. Because of your strengths, you spark the interests of others with your keen wit and sociable

nature. You can quickly establish an easy rapport with individuals by telling a joke, smiling, introducing

yourself, or giving a compliment. You recognize that laughter is a universal language. Instinctively, you

characteristically are friendly, cheerful, and talkative. This explains why you ask questions and give

compliments. You are quite fascinated with each person’s unique talents and other traits.

Questions

  1. As you read your personalized strengths insights, what words, phrases, or lines stand out to you?
  2. Out of all the talents in this insight, what would you like for others to see most in you?

73160795

Copyright © 2000, 2006-2012 Gallup, Inc. All rights reserved.

NR534A- Informatics & Healthcare Tech

/in /by

NR534A- Informatics & Healthcare Tech

Week 05 Discussion

  • How can health IT systems be leveraged for patient engagement and empowerment? Why is it important for families and caregivers of patients to be included in these processes?
  • How might you utilize health IT systems to support your patients, as well as their families and caregivers?
  • (In 200 words)

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

Week 05 Assignment – Health IT Evaluation – Part II

For this week’s assignment:(In 3 Pages)

  • Complete sections VI – X of the Health IT Evaluation Toolkit. The toolkit should be used as a guide for the student to write a word document that includes the sections for this assignment.
    APA formatting (with the exception of an abstract) is required for this submission. NR534A- Informatics & Healthcare Tech
  • Submit your documents below.

For complete information refer to your Health IT Evaluation Project.

If your organization is not considering implementing any new technology in the near future, you may elect to evaluate the process that was completed for a health IT system already in existence.

 

Health IT Evaluation Project

Health information technology (IT) is largely utilized for the purposes of improving care, healthcare quality, and patient safety. Implementing health IT systems in healthcare organizations is an incredibly expensive, detailed endeavor. Oftentimes, large project implementations, while intended to increase efficiency, ultimately do not live up to the potential. The causes for this are multifaceted, and thus early stages of evaluation are necessary to avoid costly and dangerous technology failures (Cusack et al., 2009).

The purpose of this project is for you to perform an evaluation of a proposed health IT system in your place of employment, using components of the Health Information Technology Evaluation Toolkit published by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). If your organization is not considering implementing any new technology in the near future, you may elect to evaluate the process that was completed for a health IT system already in existence.

The Health IT Evaluation Toolkit  by Cusack, et al. is also listed on the Require Reading page as a Resource. The toolkit should be used as a guide for the student to write APA style formatted word document(s) that include the sections for the different assignments.

Week 3: Health IT Evaluation Toolkit Assignment (Part 1)

For this week’s assignment, complete sections I-V of the Health IT Evaluation Toolkit. APA formatting (with the exception of an abstract) is required for this submission. For section II of the toolkit, be sure to select two or more important stakeholders and discuss their goals and vision for success of this proposed project implementation.

Week 5: Health IT Evaluation Toolkit Assignment (Part 2)

For this week’s assignment, complete sections VI – X of the Health IT Evaluation Toolkit. APA formatting (with the exception of an abstract) is required for this submission.

Week 7: Health IT Evaluation Toolkit Assignment (Part 3) NR534A- Informatics & Healthcare Tech

For this week’s assignment, complete sections XI – XV of the Health IT Evaluation Toolkit. APA formatting (with the exception of an abstract) is required for this submission.

Week 9: Health IT Evaluation Toolkit Assignment (Part 4)

For this week’s assignment, complete sections XVI – XVII of the Health IT Evaluation Toolkit. APA formatting (with the exception of an abstract) is required for this submission.

Week 11: Final System Evaluation Project paper

For this week’s assignment, complete section XVIII of the Health IT Evaluation Toolkit. APA formatting (including an abstract) is required for this submission.

In earlier weeks your assignment deliverables are formative components of the toolkit. This week, you will turn in your completed project, which is the total evaluation.

Your final submission, the evaluation plan, should be formatted as follows:

  1. Short description of the project
  2. Goals of the project
  3. Questions to be answered by the evaluation effort
  4. First measure to be evaluated – quantitative
    1. Overview – general considerations
    2. Timeframe
    3. Study design/comparison group
    4. Data collection plan
    5. Analysis plan
    6. Power/sample size calculations
  5. Second measure to be evaluated – qualitative
    1. Overview – general considerations
    2. Timeframe
    3. Study design
    4. Data collection plan
    5. Analysis plan
  6. Subsequent measures to be evaluated in the same format

 

Week 06 Discussion

  • Describe one clinical decision support tool you have seen in practice. What impact does it have on safety and workflows?
  • If you could create your own clinical decision support tool, what would it include and why?
  • (In 200 words)

 

Week 07 Discussion

  • Should clinical and non-clinical healthcare staff have the same permissions for viewing health information? Why or why not?
  • What should confidentiality policies related to health IT systems include?
  • (In 200 words)

 

Week 07 Assignment – Health IT Evaluation – Part III

For this week’s assignment:(In 3 Pages)

  • Complete sections XI-XV of the Health IT Evaluation Toolkit. The toolkit should be used as a guide for the student to write a word document that includes the sections for this assignment.
    APA formatting (with the exception of an abstract) is required for this submission.
  • Submit your documents below.

For complete information refer to your Health IT Evaluation Project.

If your organization is not considering implementing any new technology in the near future, you may elect to evaluate the process that was completed for a health IT system already in existence.

 

Week 08 Discussion

  • Describe how evidence-based practice and clinical information intersect, particularly in the context of creating safe, reliable health IT systems.
  • Then, describe how you would promote their use by any two of the following populations:
    • patients,
    • clinicians,
    • policy makers,
    • developers of guidance, and
    • the public.
  • (In 200 words)

.

 

 

Nursing homework help

/in /by

Nursing homework help

Please Reply to the following 2 Discussion posts: Nursing homework help

 

Requirement

 

APA format with intext citation

Word count minimum of 150 words per post

References at least one high-level scholarly reference per post within the last 5 years in APA format.

Plagiarism free.

Turnitin receipt.

 

DISCUSSION POST # 1 Nozomi

 

I have worked in the Medical-Surgical/Telemetry unit for a few years now, and one of the most common cardiac diseases that I have seen in patients is Congestive Heart Failure (CHF). In fact, CHF affects about 26 million people worldwide, and 800,000 new cases are diagnosed every year (Wang & Li, 2021). Furthermore, the incidence rate is expected to increase every year due to the rising number of people with risk factors for CHF, such as hypertension and diabetes (Wang & Li, 2021). CHF is very debilitating; not only can the disease lower the quality of life for patients, but it can be very costly to public health due to the poor outcomes and high cost of treatment (Wang & Li, 2021). Therefore, prevention of CHF and better management of the disease are beneficial to individual patients and for society as a whole. Nursing homework help

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

I would like to utilize this information regarding CHF to devise a clinical question in the PICOT format. According to Melnyk and Fineout-Overholt (2019), a PICOT question consists of Patient population, Intervention or Issue, Comparison intervention, Outcome, and Time. My PICOT question is as follows: “In CHF patients (P), how does follow-up education after discharge (I) compared with CHF education during hospitalization (C) affect the rate of re-hospitalization due to CHF exacerbation (O) within six months?”

This PICOT question is relevant and important because of how prevalent CHF is. As stated earlier, CHF affects many people worldwide. As nurses and advanced practice nurses, we are likely to come across many patients who suffer from CHF. Furthermore, some studies have shown that the provision of individualized education to CHF patients after discharge can lead to decreased re-admission due to CHF (Wang & Li, 2021). As educators, nurses can empower patients by providing them with the knowledge and means to maintain optimal health and minimize the negative effects of the disease.

 

DISCUSSION POST # 2 Elaine

PICOT questions are important for focusing the search for evidence in the introductory process of evidence-based practice. Without properly constructed PICOT questions, research pertinent to the issue at hand may be difficult to locate, or results found may be lacking the necessary evidentiary support to provide the best clinical outcomes (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2019). According to Dr. Fineout-Overholt, “the purpose of PICOT questions is to guide the systematic search of healthcare databases to find the best available evidence to answer the question” (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2019, p.72). Therefore, PICOT questions must be properly constructed with all the essential elements to maximize the search for evidence in the literature.

The PICOT question I have constructed is: How does the incorporation of testosterone in bioidentical hormone replacement for perimenopausal and postmenopausal women affect the symptoms of hormone deficiency (e.g. sleeplessness, fatigue, lack of energy, decreased libido, weight gain) compared to the use of estrogen and/or progesterone alone? I came up with this question dealing with my health journey and struggle to find adequate and reliable information on the subject. There is a significant amount of bioidentical hormone replacement options on the market, but some are not recognized by the general medical community, specifically the use of testosterone replacement in women. However, there a many doctors that tout its positive benefits for women and promote its use. I am searching for evidence in the literature that either confirms or contradicts this claim. The journey through perimenopause and menopause can be a difficult process for women and include horrible symptoms that affect a woman’s sleep, energy, exercise, sexual relationship, temperature control, and weight gain for several years. If there is a better way to counteract these symptoms and provide improved patient outcomes then they need to be recognized by the medical community as a whole and incorporated into practice guidelines. My one fear in selecting this question is that there will not be a significant amount of research in which to write my paper or qualify the outcome.

 

 

Nursing homework help

/in /by

Nursing homework help

Week 05 Discussion

From the following study below, pick any category in the table at bottom of paper (Supplementary Material), such as HIV or maternal disorders, and discuss changes or trends in prevalence, incidence, and years lived with disability. Nursing homework help

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

Hint: Pick the topic consistent with your project. What are at least two relevant implications for prevention or intervention?

Vos, T., Abajobir, A., Abate, K., … et. al. (2017). Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. The Lancet. [Library Link]

(In 200 words)

 

 

Week 05 Project Assignment – Literature Review

(3 Pages).

  1. Identify the target population you will focus on. For instance, if your interest is in access to mammography, this is your chance to become more specific, such as access to mammography among black women (a vulnerable group) in rural areas of Vermont.
  2. Write a paragraph about why this specific population is of concern regarding this particular health problem.
  3. Review the literature. Discuss the medical literature but also include information pertaining to applicable law and regulation, statistics (include attendant data sources) as it pertains to your topic, and synthesize the information to describe the extent of the problem.

There are many locations on-line that talk about literature reviews, but if you need some help, try:

McCombes, S. (2019 – upd. 2021). How to write a literature review. Scribbr.com.

 

Week 06 Discussion

  • Identify and discuss a health problem of interest using the Healthy People 2030 data (no more than 600 words.) You can use the same public health problem you are choosing for your project paper if you wish.
  • (In 200 words)

 

 

Week 06 Project Assignment – SMART Goals

(3 Pages).

What do you want to accomplish with your Project Paper? Write at least 3 measurable goals (but don’t boil the ocean).

For example:

“Increase the national vaccination rate for all children in the US” is a bit ambitious. Nursing homework help

BUT

“Improving the vaccination rate among preschoolers seen in a free clinic by 1%” may be more doable, unless the vaccination rate is already quite high. But before you can get to an outcome goal such as an increased vaccination rate, you probably should address some process goals. A process goal maybe something like “Improving knowledge about immunization among newly hired nurses as evidenced by successfully completing a novel course on immunizations within the first three months of hire.”.

Try to write your goals in SMART format, although that isn’t always possible. If you can’t write them as SMART goals, include a sentence or two as to why not. One way to approach this is to write a goal, then identify all of the SMART elements for that goal, revising the goal as needed for the elements.

Examples:

At least 100 low income, sexually active, teens will be tested for HIV in this clinic between Jan 1 and June 30.
Specific Testing of low-income teens for HIV
Measurable One can count the unique individuals tested, in this example there is a goal of at least 100
Attainable This is attainable as long as the population served has enough low income teens, although the goal may be helped if the clinic is in one of the thirty-one states that explicitly include testing and treatment for HIV without parental consent.
Relevant Testing is key to knowing HIV status
Time Jan 1-June 30

 

80% of participants in the HTN clinic will be able to identify 3 low-sodium food choices from a select list upon completion of nutritional counseling during 2023.
Specific Identify select foods (assumption is there is a list or other resource)
Measurable 80% of participants and 3 low-sodium foods
Attainable 80% is the goal, if that is attainable remains to be seen
Relevant Dietary modification is important for self-management of HTN
Time Upon completion of nutritional counseling during 2023

For more information refer to the Overview of Project Paper that covers all parts of your final paper for this class.

Refer to the Syllabus for point value of this assignment. Your Activity Completion checkbox will be marked when you submit to this dropbox, remember to check your gradebook for your grade.

 

 

Week 07 Discussion

  • Explain at least one positive and one negative impact of knowing the genetic propensity of a person to develop a disease.
  • How does one integrate genetic information into a health assessment impact?
  • (In 200 words)

 

Week 08 Discussion

Question(s):

  • There are multiple measures for health-related quality of life. Do you think this can or cannot be adequately measured?
  • Cite at least two differing resources.
  • (In 200 words)

 

Week 08 Project Assignment – Planned Interventions

(3 Pages).

In the last paper, you set your goals. Now, identify at least two interventions you will institute as part of the program you are developing to address the problem.

Maybe its presenting a 30 min in-service to the nursing staff addressing fears and misconceptions about diabetes among your target group. For whatever it is, please describe:

  • What each intervention will entail.
  • Timeline for implementation.
  • Assignment of duties and responsibilities.
  • Potential funding source(s)?
  • Communications plan.
  • Key organizations and individuals to include in planning. Discuss why you selected these groups or individuals

Critique each of the identified prevention or promotion services and report as a SWOT analysis.

A SWOT analysis factors in the Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats.

For more information refer to the Overview of Project Paper that covers all parts of your final paper for this class.

Refer to the Syllabus for point value of this assignment. Your Activity Completion checkbox will be marked when you submit to this dropbox, remember to check your gradebook for your grade.

 

 

 

Nursing homework help

/in /by

Nursing homework help

Compensation

Chapter 18a – Assignment Nursing homework help

Scenario: Martha, an RN that has been working at XYZ hospital for the last 20 years as a nurse and is very familiar with many aspects of the hospital at various levels of operation. She has served in administration when the hospital needed the coverage and also spent many years as a nurse working in the unit where she is working now.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

Recently the hospital administration announced a 2% pay increase for all employees. Several of Martha’s colleagues believe that this is a generous raise especially considering the economy of the country which has been fairly poor lately. Others consider the raise a slap in the face considering the hard work that they all have contributed to in the last year.

Also, a successful JCAHO survey accreditation with accommodation only 3 months ago and several community awards pointing out the great work the nurses have done both in the hospital and in the community. Although these all demonstrated the dedication and outstanding nature of the nurses in the hospital, it has been a sticking point for many of the nurses because they feel that the 2% raise is being shared among other employees in the hospital, and, a 2% raise after taxes and divided by 2080 hours is about 25 cents an hour for most of the nurses in the hospital. Nursing homework help

Furthermore, Martha being a trusted individual among administrators and nurses alike has found herself in a difficult position because many people in the hospital are asking her to weigh in on the recent raise.

Instructions:

  1. Read the scenario above.
  2. Then, answer the following questions below:
    1. How do you feel Martha should handle it when she is asked about the recent raise?
    2. Is there any action that administration could find to recognize the nurses and the hard work they have performed in the last year?
    3. Is there any problem with these solutions that you might anticipate?
    4. Summarize what you have learned about internal/external rewards from the readings in the textbook, and then, discuss how this might fit into the scenario at XYZ hospital.
  1. Your paper should be:
    • One (1) page
    • Typed according to APA style for margins, formatting, and spacing standards
    • Typed into a Microsoft Word document, save the file, and then upload the file
  2. Upload your file by clicking “Browse My Computer” for Attach File.

 

 

 

Health Care Informatics

/in /by

Health Care Informatics

APA format

 

Parts  1 and 2 have the same questions, however, you must answer with references and different writing always addressing them objectively, that is as if you were different students. Similar responses in wording or references will not be accepted.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

Parts  3 and 4 have the same questions, however, you must answer with references and different writing always addressing them objectively, that is as if you were different students. Similar responses in wording or references will not be accepted. Health Care Informatics

1) Minimum 6 pages  (No word count per page)- Follow the 3 x 3 rule: minimum three paragraphs per page

You must strictly comply with the number of paragraphs requested per page.

           Part 1: minimum  1 page

           Part 2: minimum  1 page 

           Part 3: minimum  1 page

           Part 4: minimum  1 page

           Part 5: minimum  1 page

           Part 6: minimum  1 page

   Submit 1 document per part

2)¨******APA norms

All paragraphs must be narrative and cited in the text- each paragraph

         Bulleted responses are not accepted

         Don’t write in the first person 

Don’t copy and paste the questions.

Answer the question objectively, do not make introductions to your answers, answer it when you start the paragraph

Submit 1 document per part

3)****************************** It will be verified by Turnitin (Identify the percentage of exact match of writing with any other resource on the internet and academic sources, including universities and data banks)

********************************It will be verified by SafeAssign (Identify the percentage of similarity of writing with any other resource on the internet and academic sources, including universities and data banks)

4) Minimum 3 references (APA format) per part not older than 5 years  (Journals, books) (No websites)

All references must be consistent with the topic-purpose-focus of the parts. Different references are not allowed.

5) Identify your answer with the numbers, according to the question. Start your answer on the same line, not the next

Example: Health Care Informatics

Q 1. Nursing is XXXXX

Q 2. Health is XXXX

6) You must name the files according to the part you are answering: 

Example:

Part 1.doc 

Part 2.doc

__________________________________________________________________________________

Parts  1 and 2 have the same questions, however, you must answer with references and different writing always addressing them objectively, that is as if you were different students. Similar responses in wording or references will not be accepted.

Part 1: Health care informatics

1. Discuss how healthcare informatics has been applied to your APRN education.

2. Give concrete examples

Part 2: Health care informatics

1. Discuss how healthcare informatics has been applied to your APRN education.

2. Give concrete examples

Parts  3 and 4 have the same questions, however, you must answer with references and different writing always addressing them objectively, that is as if you were different students. Similar responses in wording or references will not be accepted.

Part 3:  Health promotion

1.  Describe 2 challenges during the implementation phase of a health promotion strategy in multicultural communities.

2. Describe one strategies for approach each challenges of question 1

3. How addressing

a.Cultural characteristics

b.History

c. specific needs.

Part 4: Health promotion

1. Describe 2 challenges during the implementation phase of a health promotion strategy in multicultural communities.

2. Describe one strategies for approach each challenges of question 1

3. How addressing

a.Cultural characteristics

b.History

c. specific needs.

Part 5: Epidemiology

Topic: Making the Case for Population Health Management: The Business Value of a Healthy Workforce.

1. Discuss how can public and private organizations can work together better to achieve goals of mutual interest in healthcare?

Part 6: Epidemiology

Topic: Marketing and Communication.

1. What is social marketing

2. What is the social marketing implication for healthcare practice and practices/institutions competition?

Nursing And Aging Family

/in /by

Nursing And Aging Family

APA format

1) Minimum 6 pages  (No word count per page)- Follow the 3 x 3 rule: minimum three paragraphs per page Nursing And Aging Family

You must strictly comply with the number of paragraphs requested per page.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

           Part 1: minimum  1 page

           Part 2: minimum  1 page 

           Part 3: minimum  1 page

           Part 4: minimum  1 page

           Part 5: minimum  1 page

           Part 6: minimum  1 page

   Submit 1 document per part

2)¨******APA norms

All paragraphs must be narrative and cited in the text- each paragraph

         Bulleted responses are not accepted

         Don’t write in the first person 

Don’t copy and paste the questions.

Answer the question objectively, do not make introductions to your answers, answer it when you start the paragraph Nursing And Aging Family

Submit 1 document per part

3)****************************** It will be verified by Turnitin (Identify the percentage of exact match of writing with any other resource on the internet and academic sources, including universities and data banks)

********************************It will be verified by SafeAssign (Identify the percentage of similarity of writing with any other resource on the internet and academic sources, including universities and data banks)

4) Minimum 3 references (APA format) per part not older than 5 years  (Journals, books) (No websites)

All references must be consistent with the topic-purpose-focus of the parts. Different references are not allowed.

5) Identify your answer with the numbers, according to the question. Start your answer on the same line, not the next

Example:

Q 1. Nursing is XXXXX

Q 2. Health is XXXX

6) You must name the files according to the part you are answering: 

Example:

Part 1.doc 

Part 2.doc

__________________________________________________________________________________

Part 1: Nursing and aging family

Topic: Normal changes of aging-related to the heart Nursing And Aging Family

 

Investigate normal changes of aging-related to the heart.

1. Describe 2 changes of aging-related to the heart.

2. Provide  2 prevention strategies for the changes describes

3. Provide 2 intervention strategies for the changes descibes

Part 2: Nursing and aging family

Topic: Normal changes of aging-related to the heart

 

1.Discussing factors that promote cardiovascular health

2. Discussing life styles that could reduce the incidence of changes selected in Part 1 Question 1

3. Describe nursing role addressing the changes selected in Part 1 Question 1

Part 3: Health care informatics

1. Discuss how healthcare informatics has been applied to your APRN education.

2. Give concrete examples

Part 4: Health promotion

1. Describe 2 challenges during the implementation phase of a health promotion strategy in multicultural communities.

2. Describe one strategies for approach each challenges of question 1

3. How addressing

a.Cultural characteristics

b.History

c. specific needs.

Part 5: Epidemiology

Topic: Making the Case for Population Health Management: The Business Value of a Healthy Workforce.

1. Discuss how can public and private organizations can work together better to achieve goals of mutual interest in healthcare?

Part 6: Epidemiology

Topic: Marketing and Communication.

1. What is social marketing

2. What is the social marketing implication for healthcare practice and practices/institutions competition?

Literautre Eval Essay

/in /by

Literautre Eval Essay

Literature Evaluation Table – Rubric

Collapse All Literature Evaluation Table – RubricCollapse All Literautre Eval Essay

Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and Permalink or Working Link to Access Article

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

2.5 points

Criteria Description

Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and Permalink or Working Link to Access Article Literautre Eval Essay

  1. 5: Excellent

2.5 points

Author, journal (peer-reviewed), and permalink or working link to access article section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details.

  1. 4: Good

2.23 points

Author, journal (peer-reviewed), and permalink or working link to access article section is clearly provided and well developed.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

1.98 points

Author, journal (peer-reviewed), and permalink or working link to access article section is present.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

1.88 points

Author, journal (peer-reviewed), and permalink or working link to access article section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Author, journal (peer-reviewed), and permalink or working link to access article section is not included. Literautre Eval Essay

Article Title and Year Published

2.5 points

Criteria Description

Article Title and Year Published

  1. 5: Excellent

2.5 points

Article title and year published section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details.

  1. 4: Good

2.23 points

Article title and year published section is clearly provided and well developed.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

1.98 points

Article title and year published section is present.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

1.88 points

Article title and year published section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Article title and year published section is not included.

Research Questions (Qualitative) or Hypothesis (Quantitative), and Purposes or Aim of Study

5 points

Criteria Description

Research Questions (Qualitative) or Hypothesis (Quantitative), and Purposes or Aim of Study

  1. 5: Excellent

5 points

Research questions (qualitative) or hypothesis (quantitative), and purposes or aim of study section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details.

  1. 4: Good

4.45 points

Research questions (qualitative) or hypothesis (quantitative), and purposes or aim of study section is clearly provided and well developed.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

3.95 points

Research questions (qualitative) or hypothesis (quantitative), and purposes or aim of study section is present.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

3.75 points

Research questions (qualitative) or hypothesis (quantitative), and purposes or aim of study section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Research questions (qualitative) or hypothesis (quantitative), and purposes or aim of study section is not included.

Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative)

2.5 points

Criteria Description

Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative)

  1. 5: Excellent

2.5 points

Design (type of quantitative, or type of qualitative) section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details.

  1. 4: Good

2.23 points

Design (type of quantitative, or type of qualitative) section is clearly provided and well developed.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

1.98 points

Design (type of quantitative, or type of qualitative) section is present.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

1.88 points

Design (type of quantitative, or type of qualitative) section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Design (type of quantitative, or type of qualitative) section is not included.

Setting or Sample

2.5 points

Criteria Description

Setting or Sample

  1. 5: Excellent

2.5 points

Setting or sample section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details.

  1. 4: Good

2.23 points

Setting or sample section is clearly provided and well developed.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

1.98 points

Setting or sample section is present.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

1.88 points

Setting or sample section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Setting or sample section is not included.

Methods: Intervention or Instruments

2.5 points

Criteria Description

Methods: Intervention or Instruments

  1. 5: Excellent

2.5 points

Methods: Intervention or Instruments section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details.

  1. 4: Good

2.23 points

Methods: Intervention or Instruments section is clearly provided and well developed.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

1.98 points

Methods: Intervention or Instruments section is present.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

1.88 points

Methods: Intervention or Instruments section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Methods: Intervention or Instruments section is not included.

Analysis

5 points

Criteria Description

Analysis

  1. 5: Excellent

5 points

Analysis section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details.

  1. 4: Good

4.45 points

Analysis section is clearly provided and well developed.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

3.95 points

Analysis section is present.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

3.75 points

Analysis section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Analysis section is not included.

Key Findings

5 points

Criteria Description

Key Findings

  1. 5: Excellent

5 points

Key findings section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details.

  1. 4: Good

4.45 points

Key findings section is clearly provided and well developed.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

3.95 points

Key findings section is present.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

3.75 points

Key findings section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Key findings section is not included.

Recommendations

5 points

Criteria Description

Recommendations

  1. 5: Excellent

5 points

Recommendations section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details.

  1. 4: Good

4.45 points

Recommendations section is clearly provided and well developed.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

3.95 points

Recommendations section is present.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

3.75 points

Recommendations section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Recommendations section is not included.

Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP or Capstone

5 points

Criteria Description

Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP or Capstone

  1. 5: Excellent

5 points

Explanation of how the article supports EBP or capstone section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details.

  1. 4: Good

4.45 points

Explanation of how the article supports EBP or capstone section is clearly provided and well developed.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

3.95 points

Explanation of how the article supports EBP or capstone section is provided.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

3.75 points

Explanation of how the article supports EBP or capstone section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Explanation of how the article supports EBP or capstone section is not included.

Presentation

5 points

Criteria Description

Presentation

  1. 5: Excellent

5 points

The work is well presented and includes all required elements. The overall appearance is neat and professional.

  1. 4: Good

4.45 points

The overall appearance is generally neat, with a few minor flaws or missing elements.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

3.95 points

The overall appearance is general, and major elements are missing.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

3.75 points

The work is not neat and includes minor flaws or omissions of required elements.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

The piece is not neat or organized, and it does not include all required elements.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)

5 points

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)

  1. 5: Excellent

5 points

The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

  1. 4: Good

4.45 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

3.95 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

3.75 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed.

Documentation of Sources

2.5 points

Criteria Description

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style

  1. 5: Excellent

2.5 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

  1. 4: Good

2.23 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

1.98 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

1.88 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Sources are not documented.

Total 50 points

 

Nursing homework help

/in /by

Nursing homework help

Students are required to submit weekly reflective narratives throughout the course that will culminate in a final, course-long reflective journal due in Topic 10. The narratives help students integrate leadership and inquiry into current practice.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

This reflection journal also allows students to outline what they have discovered about their professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses, and additional resources that could be introduced in a given situation to influence optimal outcomes. Each week students should also explain how they met a course competency or course objective(s). Nursing homework help

In each week’s entry, students should reflect on the personal knowledge and skills gained throughout the course. Journal entries should address one or more of the areas stated below.  In the Topic 10 graded submission, each of the areas below should be addressed as part of the summary submission.

  1. New practice approaches
  2. Interprofessional collaboration
  3. Health care delivery and clinical systems
  4. Ethical considerations in health care
  5. Practices of culturally sensitive care
  6. Ensuring the integrity of human dignity in the care of all patients
  7. Population health concerns
  8. The role of technology in improving health care outcomes
  9. Health policy
  10. Leadership and economic models
  11. Health disparities

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Nursing homework help

This is week 4 so it will be topic 4

Rubric reflective journal

Professional Capstone and Practicum Reflective Journal – Rubric

Collapse All Professional Capstone And Practicum Reflective Journal – RubricCollapse All

New Practice Approaches

0 points

Criteria Description

New Practice Approaches

  1. 5: Excellent

0 points

New practice approaches are present, complete, and incorporate additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

  1. 4: Good

0 points

New practice approaches are present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

0 points

New practice approaches are present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

0 points

New practice approaches are present, but they are incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

New practice approaches are not present.

Interprofessional Collaboration (C4.3)

0 points

Criteria Description

Interprofessional Collaboration (C4.3)

  1. 5: Excellent

0 points

Interprofessional collaboration information is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

  1. 4: Good

0 points

Interprofessional collaboration information is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

0 points

Interprofessional collaboration information is present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

0 points

Interprofessional collaboration information is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Interprofessional collaboration information is not present.

Health Care Delivery and Clinical Systems

0 points

Criteria Description

Health Care Delivery and Clinical Systems

  1. 5: Excellent

0 points

Health care delivery and clinical systems information is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

  1. 4: Good

0 points

Health care delivery and clinical systems information is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

0 points

Health care delivery and clinical systems information is present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

0 points

Health care delivery and clinical systems information is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Health care delivery and clinical systems information is not present.

Ethical Considerations In Health Care (C2.3)

0 points

Criteria Description

Ethical Considerations In Health Care (C2.3)

  1. 5: Excellent

0 points

Information regarding ethical considerations in health care is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

  1. 4: Good

0 points

Information regarding ethical considerations in health care is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

0 points

Information regarding ethical considerations in health care is present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

0 points

Information regarding ethical considerations in health care is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Information regarding ethical considerations in health care is not present.

Practice of Culturally Sensitive Care (C5.3)

0 points

Criteria Description

Practice of Culturally Sensitive Care (C5.3)

  1. 5: Excellent

0 points

Information regarding the practice of culturally sensitive care is present and complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

  1. 4: Good

0 points

Information regarding the practice of culturally sensitive care is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

0 points

Information regarding the practice of culturally sensitive care is present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

0 points

Information regarding the practice of culturally sensitive care is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Information regarding the practice of culturally sensitive care is not present.

Preservation of Integrity of Human Dignity in the Care of All Patients (C5.4)

0 points

Criteria Description

Preservation of Integrity of Human Dignity in the Care of All Patients (C5.4)

  1. 5: Excellent

0 points

Information regarding the preservation of integrity and human dignity in the care of all patients is present and complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

  1. 4: Good

0 points

Information regarding the preservation of integrity and human dignity in the care of all patients is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

0 points

Information regarding the preservation of integrity and human dignity in the care of all patients is present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

0 points

Information regarding the preservation of integrity and human dignity in the care of all patients is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Information regarding the preservation of integrity and human dignity in the care of all patients is not present.

Population Health Concerns

0 points

Criteria Description

Population Health Concerns

  1. 5: Excellent

0 points

Information regarding population health concerns is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

  1. 4: Good

0 points

Information regarding population health concerns is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

0 points

Information regarding population health concerns is present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

0 points

Information regarding population health concerns is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Information regarding population health concerns is not present.

Role of Technology in Improving Health Care Outcomes (C4.1)

0 points

Criteria Description

Role of Technology in Improving Health Care Outcomes (C4.1)

  1. 5: Excellent

0 points

Information on the role of technology in improving health care outcomes is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

  1. 4: Good

0 points

Information on the role of technology in improving health care outcomes is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

0 points

Information on the role of technology in improving health care outcomes is present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

0 points

Information on the role of technology in improving health care outcomes is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Information on the role of technology in improving health care outcomes is not present.

Health Policy

0 points

Criteria Description

Health Policy

  1. 5: Excellent

0 points

Health policy information is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

  1. 4: Good

0 points

Health policy information is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

0 points

Health policy information is present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

0 points

Health policy information is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Health policy information is not present.

Leadership and Economic Models

0 points

Criteria Description

Leadership and Economic Models

  1. 5: Excellent

0 points

Information on leadership and economic models is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

  1. 4: Good

0 points

Information on leadership and economic models is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

0 points

Information on leadership and economic models is present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

0 points

Information on leadership and economic models is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Information on leadership and economic models is not present.

Health Disparities

0 points

Criteria Description

Health Disparities

  1. 5: Excellent

0 points

Information on health disparities is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

  1. 4: Good

0 points

Information on health disparities is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

0 points

Information on health disparities is present Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

0 points

Information on health disparities is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Information on health disparities is not present.

Outline of Overall Personal Discovery

0 points

Criteria Description

Outline of Overall Personal Discovery

  1. 5: Excellent

0 points

Outline of what student discovered about professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses that surfaced, additional resources and abilities that could be introduced to a given situation to influence optimal outcomes, and how the student met the competencies aligned to this course is present and complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

  1. 4: Good

0 points

Outline of what student discovered about professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses that surfaced, additional resources and abilities that could be introduced to a given situation to influence optimal outcomes, and how the student met the competencies aligned to this course is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

0 points

Outline of what student discovered about professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses that surfaced, additional resources and abilities that could be introduced to a given situation to influence optimal outcomes, and how the student met the competencies aligned to this course is present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

0 points

Outline of what student discovered about professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses that surfaced, additional resources and abilities that could be introduced to a given situation to influence optimal outcomes, and how the student met the competencies aligned to this course is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Outline of what student discovered about professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses that surfaced, additional resources and abilities that could be introduced to a given situation to influence optimal outcomes, and how the student met the competencies aligned to this course is not present.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

0 points

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

  1. 5: Excellent

0 points

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

  1. 4: Good

0 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

0 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

0 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.