Capstone Change Project Evaluation Plan

Capstone Change Project Evaluation Plan

Apr 25-May 1, 2022

Students must develop skills related to systematic evaluation for intervention effectiveness. The content covered this week prepares students to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions and develop communication plans for the dissemination of information related to project outcomes. Synthesis of information from the process of evaluating outcomes (whether outcomes were met or not) generates new knowledge and adds to the body of knowledge for nursing practice. Capstone Change Project Evaluation Plan

Objectives:

  1. Determine how the capstone project change proposal could be disseminated to leadership.
  2. Create a plan to evaluate outcomes of the proposed nursing practice intervention used in the change proposal.
  3. Integrate reflective practice into the practicum reflective journal.
  4. Demonstrate interprofessional collaboration during the creation of the capstone project change proposal.

 

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW

 

DQ1

 

Describe one internal and one external method for the dissemination of your evidence-based change proposal. For example, an internal method may be the hospital board, and an external method may be a professional nursing organization. Discuss why it is important to report your change proposal to both of these groups. How will your communication strategies change for each group?

DQ2

 

In order to evaluate an evidence-based practice project, it is important to be able to determine the effectiveness of your change. Discuss one way you will be able to evaluate whether your project made a difference in practice.

Capstone Change Project Evaluation Plan

SUBMIT ASSIGNMENT

Review your strategic plan to implement the change proposal, the objectives, the outcomes, and listed resources. Develop a process to evaluate the intervention if it were implemented. Write a 150-250 word summary of the evaluation plan that will be used to evaluate your intervention.

The assignment will be used to develop a written implementation plan. Capstone Change Project Evaluation Plan

DQ1
Kayla Machingo

One internal method for the dissemination of the early mobility change proposal is the house wide shared governance council. This council incorporates ethics, quality, and leadership into each department. It does so by each unit having representatives for a specific topic that research new evidence-based practices and aid in implementation. It is very important to have this large group of nurses involved as they are the foundation of Mission Hospital. More specifically, they can help advocate for the change proposal by requesting funds, creating newsletters, and sharing the new knowledge with other units. Being that I am apart of this council, my communication strategy would be more friendly and engaging, as I know many of the individuals. This would be more of a group bonding experience and could really lead to something great!

One external method for dissemination of the proposal would be the American Nurses Association (ANA). This organization has an entire webpage directed to mobility programs and aids nurses in mobilizing patients safely. More specifically, they advocate for the use of lift devices to prevent injury for the nurses (American Nurses Association, 2022). This would be an important foundation to have by my side, as this project involves a lot of activity from the nurses including the use of the lift device. Therefore, the ANA can be a great resource for providing mobility education and support for the nurses working at the bedside. This form of communication would be extremely formal and would provide detail about the project and its goals. Capstone Change Project Evaluation Plan

Reference

 

American Nurses Association. (2022). Health and safety. https://www.nursingworld.org/practice-policy/work-environment/health-safety/handle-with-care/

DQ1
Virginia Gallardo

One important aspect is ensuring the dissemination of our evidence-based proposal, which can be achieved via internal and external methods. The goal of dissemination is to gather the created evidence and communicate it to the population of interest (Zhu et al., 2017). Disseminating such information can be challenging because we deal with multiple barriers affecting our healthcare system, like underfunding and understaffing. Internal methods include sharing our change proposal with the hospital board via email, individual, or group discussions. A poster or podium presentation can be an efficient means of sharing one’s scholarly work (Astroth & Hain, 2019). I have chosen to disseminate information through nurse leaders via unit huddles. Nurse leaders add information to this huddle that they want to discuss with staff. During huddles, nurses and other healthcare providers discuss any problems the organization has. This strategy allows me and those supporting my project to receive instant feedback as we see how nurses feel regarding the issue and the planned interventions to address the problem. It also will enable nurses to ask questions and have them answered promptly.  Capstone Change Project Evaluation Plan

An external method for disseminating my evidence-based proposal may be through a professional organization. There are various organizations, and many health professionals turn to these organizations to gain new knowledge on evidence-based practice. These organizations hold various conferences allowing us to meet multiple nurses of different backgrounds and share information like our change proposal. Sharing information via an external method like a professional nursing organization will provide more access to nurses outside of my organization.

 

Reference

 

Astroth, K. S., & Hain, D. (2019, September 1). Disseminating Scholarly Work through Nursing Presentations. Nephrology Nursing Journal46(5), 545.

 

Zheng Zhu, Weijie Xing, Yan Hu, Yingfeng Zhou, & Ying Gu. (2018). Improving Evidence Dissemination and Accessibility through a Mobile-based Resource Platform. Journal of Medical Systems42(7), 118. https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.1007/s10916-018-0969-7 Capstone Change Project Evaluation Plan

 

Neoma Rice

For my change project, it is going to be proposed for a small privately own neurology clinic. So, the internal method for dissemination would be with the doctor and his nurse practitioners, who are all open about potentially implementing this practice of proper nutritional assessment and education for multiple sclerosis patients by nursing. I’m slightly troubled trying to think of what would be my external method of dissemination, but as I thought more I thought I could reach out to my National Multiple Sclerosis Society representative, Emily. She has a world of knowledge as someone who lives with MS, but she also works for the organization that has plentiful resources. I feel it would be important to share with Emily as she could provide me the latest and greatest nutritional recommendations that are being studied to aid me in helping these patients. Emily and i mostly communicate through email. She sent me an email today with new webinars of different MS related topics.

It has been founded that technology and training can play an important role with dissemination and implementation of an evidence-based practice (Novins et al, 2013).

Novins, D. K., Green, A. E., Legha, R. K., & Aarons, G. A. (2013). Dissemination and implementation of evidence-based practices for child and adolescent mental health: a systematic review. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry52(10), 1009–1025.e18. Capstone Change Project Evaluation Plan https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2013.07.012

DQ2

Kayla Machingo

Evaluation will be important in the early mobility capstone. The main idea I have been considering for evaluation is having patients complete a mini- evaluation on day of discharge and then again 6 months from day of surgery. I was considering using the Microsoft team’s application which has a poll application that can be sent out to individuals via email. This e-mail is secured and would represent Providence hospital. This form of evaluation seems the easiest for both me and the patients. The poll can be no more than ten questions, can have a time restriction and can be sent to all the patients (Microsoft, 2022). Once the results are back, a PDF can be created which will be useful in identifying if the early mobility project was effective (Microsoft, 2022). After a six-month period, I can compare these results with audits from 2021 to determine if the length of stay was decreased by ten percent or greater. If the evidence shows improved/shortened length of stay, then I will know that the project made a difference in practice.

 

Reference

 

Microsoft. (2022). Create a poll in teams. https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/topic/92bc2481-b5e4-4650-8a87-d90103ee95a1 Capstone Change Project Evaluation Plan

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.

Assignment

Assignment Rough Draft Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations

View RubricDue Date: May 12, 2017                 Max Points: 200

Details:

Use the practice problem and a quantitative, peer-reviewed research article you identified in the Topic 1 assignment to complete this assignment.

In a 1000-1,250 word essay, summarize the study, explain the ways in which the findings might be used in nursing practice, and address ethical considerations associated with the conduct of the study.

Refer to the resource “Research Critique Guidelines” for suggested headings and content for your paper.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.

Apply Rubrics

Rough Draft Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations

1 Unsatisfactory 0.00%

2 Less than Satisfactory 75.00%

3 Satisfactory 83.00%

4 Good 94.00%

5 Excellent 100.00%

75.0 %Content

15.0 % Background of Study

Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is incomplete.

Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.

Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.

Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.

Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.

15.0 % Method of Study

Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is incomplete.

Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.

Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.

Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.

Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.

15.0 % Results of Study

Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is incomplete.

Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.

Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.

Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.

Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.

15.0 % Ethical Considerations

Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is incomplete.

Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.

Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.

Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.

Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.

15.0 % Conclusion

Conclusion does not summarize a critical appraisal and applicability of findings.

Conclusion is vague and does not discuss importance to nursing.

Conclusion summarizes utility of the research and importance to nursing practice.

Conclusion summarizes utility of the research from the critical appraisal and the findings importance to nursing practice.

Conclusion summarizes utility of the research from the critical appraisal, knowledge learned, and the importance of the findings to nursing practice.

15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

5.0 % Thesis Development and Purpose

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

5.0 % Argument Logic and Construction

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

Argument is clear and convincing and presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

5.0 % Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

10.0 %Format

5.0 % Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.

Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

All format elements are correct.

5.0 % Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

Sources are not documented.

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

100 % Total Weightage

Evidence Based Capstone

Evidence Based Capstone

assessment Description

In collaboration with the approved course preceptor, students will identify a specific evidence-based topic for the capstone project change proposal. Students should consider the clinical environment in which they are currently employed or have recently worked. The capstone project topic can be a clinical practice problem, an organizational issue, a leadership or quality improvement initiative, or an unmet educational need specific to a patient population or community. The student may also choose to work with an interprofessional collaborative team.

Students should select a topic that aligns to their area of interest as well as the clinical practice setting in which practice hours are completed. Evidence Based Capstone

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW

Write a 500-750 word description of your proposed capstone project topic. Include the following:

  1. The problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project that will be the focus of the change proposal.
  2. The setting or context in which the problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project can be observed.
  3. A description (providing a high level of detail) regarding the problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project.
  4. Effect of the problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project.
  5. Significance of the topic and its implications for nursing practice.
  6. A proposed solution to the identified project topic with an explanation of how it will affect nursing practice.

You are required to cite to a minimum of eight peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years, appropriate for the assignment criteria, and relevant to nursing practice. Plan your time accordingly to complete this assignment. Evidence Based Capstone

discuss the Fawcett's Meta-paradigm of Nursing and relate the paradigm directly to your POI.

I need a 8 page paper. This paper is related to my previous paper and I will provide the paper once you accept this paper. The paper needs to be written in APA format. For this assignment, you will b

I need a 8 page paper. This paper is related to my previous paper and I will provide the paper once you accept this paper. The paper needs to be written in APA format. 

For this assignment, you will be further defining your Phenomenon of  Interest within a theoretical and ethical framework.  The same  Phenomenon of Interest (POI) identified in your first written paper  should also be used for this assignment.  You will begin this paper by  providing a concise description of your POI, this information should be a  short summary of information your presented in your first paper.  

Next, you will  discuss the Fawcett’s Meta-paradigm of Nursing and  relate the paradigm directly to your POI. How do the four concepts  within the meta-paradigm relate to your POI? Is one more important? Do  all four have the same level of importance?  You should support this  section with peer reviewed references as appropriate.  Specifically  identify the components of the meta-paradigm within your discussion. Be  sure to reference the meta-paradigm with the primary source.  

Then, you will select both a Grand nursing theory as well as a Middle  range nursing theory.  Take time to review several examples of each type  of theory as the selected theories need to “fit” your POI…and work  well together.  

Grand  nursing theory discussion:  identify and discuss the  inter-related concepts from your selected theory.  What aspects of the  nursing meta-paradigm are addressed by your grand theory?  Then provide  information about how you will view your POI through the lens of the  grand theory.  How does the theory guide your assessment of the POI?   How does the theoretical framework chosen categorize or define your POI?  How does the theoretical framework effect your perception of the POI? 

Middle range nursing theory discussion: identify and discuss the  inter-related concepts within the middle range theory.  What aspects of  the nursing meta-paradigm are addressed in the mid-range theory? How  will this theory guide your assessment/perception of the POI?  How does  this mid range theory relate to your grand theory?  

Complexity science: how does complexity science relate to your POI?   Depending on the nature of your POI, this conversation may have  different foci for different students.  For example, if your POI is  glycemic management of the peri-operative patient, this discussion would  center on the complex responses of the human body as a Complex Adaptive  System.  If your POI is focused on a policy change issue, the focus may  be on organizational complexities with communication, change, etc.  Identify a specific Complex Adaptive System that is related to your  chosen POI and discuss how complexity science impacts this portion of  your POI.  

Ethical framework:  you should discuss your specific POI in the context  of ethical principles.  Basic principles include autonomy, justice,  beneficence, and non-maleficence. Is your POI in violation of a core  ethical principle?  Is it possible it may be in violation?  What ethical  principles do you need to be sure to safeguard?  You should also  identify a specific Ethical Framework that will guide your  practice…Virtue ethics, Utilitarianism, the ANA Code of Ethics, are  examples of an ethical framework. 

Conclusion:  this section should not contain any new information but  should only provide a summary of what what discussed in the paper. 

Nurs-6512 Discussion Wk8

Nurs-6512 Discussion Wk8

Discussion: Assessing Musculoskeletal Pain

In this Discussion, you will consider case studies that describe abnormal findings in patients seen in a clinical setting.

To prepare:

  • Your Discussion post should be      in the Episodic/Focused SOAP Note format rather than the traditional      narrative style Discussion posting format. Refer to Chapter 2 of the      Sullivan text and the Episodic/Focused SOAP Template in the Week 5      Learning Resources for guidance. Remember that all Episodic/Focused SOAP      notes have specific data included in every patient case. Nurs-6512 Discussion Wk8
  • Review the following case      studies:

Case Study:

A 46-year-old female reports pain in both of her ankles, but she is more concerned about her right ankle. She was playing soccer over the weekend and heard a “pop.” She is able to bear weight, but it is uncomfortable. In determining the cause of the ankle pain, based on your knowledge of anatomy, what foot structures are likely involved? What other symptoms need to be explored? What are your differential diagnoses for ankle pain? What physical assessment will you perform? What special maneuvers will you perform? Should you apply the Ottawa ankle rules to determine if you need additional testing?

With regard to the case study, you were assigned:

  • Review this      week’s Learning Resources and consider the insights they provide about the      case study.
  • Consider      what history would be necessary to collect from the patient in the case      study you were assigned.
  • Consider      what physical assesments and diagnostic tests would be appropriate to      gather more information about the patient’s condition. How would the      results be used to make a diagnosis?
  • Identify at least five possible      conditions that may be considered in a differential diagnosis for the      patient. Nurs-6512 Discussion Wk8

    ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW

Assignment

Post an episodic/focused note about the patient in the case study to which you were assigned using the episodic/focused note template provided in the Week 5 resources. Provide evidence from the literature to support diagnostic tests that would be appropriate for each case. List five different possible conditions for the patient’s differential diagnosis and justify why you selected each.

Episodic/Focused SOAP Note Template

 

Patient Information:

Initials, Age, Sex, Race

S.

CC (chief complaint) a BRIEF statement identifying why the patient is here – in the patient’s own words – for instance “headache”, NOT “bad headache for 3 days”.

HPI: This is the symptom analysis section of your note. Thorough documentation in this section is essential for patient care, coding, and billing analysis. Paint a picture of what is wrong with the patient. Use LOCATES Mnemonic to complete your HPI. You need to start EVERY HPI with age, race, and gender (e.g., 34-year-old AA male). You must include the seven attributes of each principal symptom in paragraph form not a list. If the CC was “headache”, the LOCATES for the HPI might look like the following example:

Location: head

Onset: 3 days ago

Character: pounding, pressure around the eyes and temples

Associated signs and symptoms: nausea, vomiting, photophobia, phonophobia

Timing: after being on the computer all day at work

Exacerbating/ relieving factors: light bothers eyes, Aleve makes it tolerable but not completely better. Nurs-6512 Discussion Wk8

Severity: 7/10 pain scale

Current Medications: include dosage, frequency, length of time used and reason for use; also include OTC or homeopathic products.

Allergies: include medication, food, and environmental allergies separately (a description of what the allergy is ie angioedema, anaphylaxis, etc. This will help determine a true reaction vs intolerance).

PMHx: include immunization status (note date of last tetanus for all adults), past major illnesses and surgeries. Depending on the CC, more info is sometimes needed

Soc Hx: include occupation and major hobbies, family status, tobacco & alcohol use (previous and current use), any other pertinent data. Always add some health promo question here – such as whether they use seat belts all the time or whether they have working smoke detectors in the house, living environment, text/cell phone use while driving, and support system.

Fam Hx: illnesses with possible genetic predisposition, contagious or chronic illnesses. Reason for death of any deceased first degree relatives should be included. Include parents, grandparents, siblings, and children. Include grandchildren if pertinent.

ROS: cover all body systems that may help you include or rule out a differential diagnosis You should list each system as follows: General: Head: EENT: etc. You should list these in bullet format and document the systems in order from head to toe.

Example of Complete ROS:

GENERAL:  No weight loss, fever, chills, weakness or fatigue.

HEENT:  Eyes:  No visual loss, blurred vision, double vision or yellow sclerae. Ears, Nose, Throat:  No hearing loss, sneezing, congestion, runny nose or sore throat. Nurs-6512 Discussion Wk8

SKIN:  No rash or itching.

CARDIOVASCULAR:  No chest pain, chest pressure or chest discomfort. No palpitations or edema.

RESPIRATORY:  No shortness of breath, cough or sputum.

GASTROINTESTINAL:  No anorexia, nausea, vomiting or diarrhea. No abdominal pain or blood.

GENITOURINARY:  Burning on urination. Pregnancy. Last menstrual period, MM/DD/YYYY.

NEUROLOGICAL:  No headache, dizziness, syncope, paralysis, ataxia, numbness or tingling in the extremities. No change in bowel or bladder control.

MUSCULOSKELETAL:  No muscle, back pain, joint pain or stiffness.

HEMATOLOGIC:  No anemia, bleeding or bruising.

LYMPHATICS:  No enlarged nodes. No history of splenectomy.

PSYCHIATRIC:  No history of depression or anxiety.

ENDOCRINOLOGIC:  No reports of sweating, cold or heat intolerance. No polyuria or polydipsia.

ALLERGIES:  No history of asthma, hives, eczema or rhinitis.

O.

Physical exam: From head-to-toe, include what you see, hear, and feel when doing your physical exam. You only need to examine the systems that are pertinent to the CC, HPI, and History. Do not use “WNL” or “normal.” You must describe what you see. Always document in head to toe format i.e. General: Head: EENT: etc.

Diagnostic results: Include any labs, x-rays, or other diagnostics that are needed to develop the differential diagnoses (support with evidenced and guidelines)

A.

Differential Diagnoses (list a minimum of 3 differential diagnoses).Your primary or presumptive diagnosis should be at the top of the list. For each diagnosis, provide supportive documentation with evidence based guidelines.

This section is not required for the assignments in this course (NURS 6512) but will be required for future courses.

References

You are required to include at least three evidence based peer-reviewed journal articles or evidenced based guidelines which relates to this case to support your diagnostics and differentials diagnoses. Be sure to use correct APA 6th edition formatting. Nurs-6512 Discussion Wk8

 

 

Strategies For Academic Portfolios

Strategies For Academic Portfolios

Strategies for Academic Portfolios

In the realm of marketing, a successful branding strategy is one of the most important contributors to organizational success. A solid branding strategy can help add visibility and credibility to a company’s products.

Similarly, nurse-scholars can build a personal brand to add visibility and credibility to their work. You can begin building your brand by developing and maintaining an academic portfolio. Such an activity can help share the results of your efforts and contribute to your success. This Module’s Discussion asks you to consider and share strategies for building your portfolio.. Strategies For Academic Portfolios

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW

To Prepare:

Reflect on strategies that you can pursue in developing portfolios or portfolio elements that focus on academic achievements.

Review one or more samples from your own research of resources focused on portfolio development.

Post an explanation of at least two strategies for including academic activities and accomplishments into your professional development goals. Then, explain how those goals may align with the University’s emphasis on social change. Be specific and provide examples.

About me: I am psychiatric nurse that works in a psychiatric hospital, that is currently enrolled in the masters of psychiatric nursing.  Strategies For Academic Portfolios

Impact of Nursing Shortage on Healthcare

Impact of Nursing Shortage on Healthcare

Wk 6 Quest:

Part I

  • Assess the culture of the organization for potential challenges in incorporating the nursing practice intervention. Use this assessment when creating the strategic plan. Write a 150-250 word strategic plan defining how the nursing practice intervention will be implemented in the capstone project change proposal. Impact of Nursing Shortage on Healthcare

 

Work with your preceptor to assess the organization for required resources needed for the strategic plan if the change proposal were to be implemented. Review your strategic plan and determine what resources would be needed if the change proposal were to be implemented. Write a list of at least four resources you will need in order to implement your change proposal.

 

The assignment will be used to develop a written implementation plan.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines

 

 

Part II

  • After discussion with your preceptor, name one financial aspect, one quality aspect, and one clinical aspect that need to be taken into account for developing the evidence-based change proposal. Explain how your proposal will directly and indirectly impact each of the aspects. Impact of Nursing Shortage on Healthcare

 

 

  • Now that you have completed a series of assignments that have led you into the active project planning and development stage for your project, briefly describe your proposed solution to address the problem, issue, suggestion, initiative, or educational need and how it has changed since you first envisioned it. What led to your current perspective and direction?

 

 

Case Study on Acute Sinusitis

Case Study on Acute Sinusitis

As a Family Nurse Practitioner, you are assigned to analyze a case study on Acute Sinusitis in a 10 years old boy.

1. Provide a narrative of the plan of care for Acute Sinusitis. The plan of care should be supported by current evidence (include citations and level of evidence) for each component of the plan. Provide the following:

a. Include if additional diagnostic tests are indicated.

b. Non-pharmacological and pharmacological therapies

c. Referrals, counseling and education, health care maintenance.  Case Study on Acute Sinusitis

d. Follow up

e. Short-term and long-term outcomes associated with the plan of care.

2. Discuss and provide an evidence-based rationale of appropriate risk assessments/preventative screenings for the patient considering their age, race, gender, family history and/or health status. Discuss important topics for health promotion and counseling.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW

3.Discuss patient/family education pertinent to the care of the patient with Acute Sinusitis, consider health literacy of the patient and rationale for appropriate education.

4. Discuss the Family Nurse Practitioner role in managing the patient presenting with the Acute Sinusitis in context of the within the Christian worldview. Consider ethical principled that underpinned patient care and/or used to resolve an ethical dilemma encountered in the care of this patient. Case Study on Acute Sinusitis

5. Provide the level of evaluation and management that this patient with Acute Sinusitis encounter generated. Discuss how the level of management was justified according to the CMS Coding and Billing Guide.

Document this assignment in 4-page word document. References should be within last 5 years.

Write a 4–5-page impact report to senior leadership that identifies a nursing-related challenge, analyzes how it affects the organization from a nursing perspective, and details the new position.

Assessment organization

  • OverviewWrite a 4–5-page impact report to senior leadership that identifies a nursing-related challenge, analyzes how it affects the organization from a nursing perspective, and details the new position.Each organization has a unique structure that impacts the behavior of the organization. In health care organizations, this impact is on the ability of the organization to deliver quality patient care. Nursing is an essential component of any health care organization, and nursing leaders must understand the role of nursing and nursing leadership within the total organization. Understanding basic organizational structure, mission, vision, philosophy, and values will better prepare nurse leaders to improve quality and patient outcomes.SHOW LESSBy successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:
    • Competency 1: Identify nursing leadership priorities using a systems perspective.
      • Identify a nursing challenge and its impact from a nursing perspective.
      • Identify key leadership skills, knowledge, or abilities required for the position.
    • Competency 2: Apply systems theory and systems thinking to facilitate health care delivery and patient outcomes.
      • Explain how the nursing challenge creates a gap or conflict between the organization’s statements and practice.
      • Identify organizational factors that impact the situation using a SWOT analysis.
    • Competency 4: Evaluate how power relates to health care organizational structure, behavior, and leadership.
      • Assess how the new nurse leader position will have power and influence and impact patient outcomes.
    • Competency 5: Communicate in a manner that is consistent with the expectations of a nursing professional.
      • Write content clearly and logically, with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and mechanics.
      • Correctly format citations and references using current APA style.Competency MapCHECK YOUR PROGRESSUse this online tool to track your performance and progress through your course.
  • Toggle DrawerContext
  • Toggle DrawerQuestions to ConsiderTo deepen your understanding, you are encouraged to consider the questions below and discuss them with a fellow learner, a work associate, an interested friend, or a member of the heath care community.
    • What is the relationship between an organization’s structure, mission, vision, philosophy, values, and policies and procedures?
    • What strategies does your health care organization (or one that you are familiar with) use when making changes within the organization?
    • How do you see nurse leaders participating in the process of organizational change?
    • How are changes made in organizational structure, and when are they typically made?
    • How do transformational and transparent nursing leadership fit in the organization’s power structure?
  • Toggle DrawerResourcesRequired ResourcesThe following resources are required to complete the assessment.Capella ResourcesClick the link provided to view the following resource:
  • Assessment InstructionsPreparationUse the Suggested Resources for this assessment to study systems theory, SWOT analysis, and shared governance teams, as background for an Impact Report to Senior Leadership. The report includes a SWOT analysis. The SWOT Analysis Template is linked in Required Resources.
    • Study a facility in your area and examine its Web site and any available public documents to aid you in completing this assessment. You may wish to examine an organization where you work, where you have worked in the past, or where you did your clinical work.
      • Do not name the organization in your report; instead, identify the type of facility and location. Example: A rehabilitation center in a mid-size Midwestern city.Use the following scenario as the basis for your report:ScenarioThe unit-based Shared Governance Council of the organization where you work has identified a major nursing-related challenge (patient/staff safety, confidentiality, management/staff conflict, poor patient satisfaction survey scores, or nursing staff shortages) within your health care organization.In an unusual move, your system administrator is considering creating a new nurse leadership position that would have the responsibility and authority to address this specific issue. As a member of the shared governance council’s subcommittee, you have been asked to write the committee’s final report.Deliverable: Impact Report to Senior LeadershipWrite a 4–5-page Impact Report to senior leadership that identifies the challenge, analyzes how it affects the organization from a nursing perspective, and details the new position.
    • Use systems thinking and leadership theory as tools to approach this problem.Construct the report with the following headings:The Nursing Challenge:
    • Identify the nursing challenge and its impact from a nursing perspective. Choose from:
      • Patient/staff safety, confidentiality, management/staff conflict, poor patient satisfaction survey scores, or nursing staff shortages.The System/Organization:
    • Explain how the nursing challenge creates a gap or conflict between the organization’s statements and practice.
      • Identify the organization type, that is, specialty hospital, teaching hospital, major health care system, et cetera, and summarize the organizational structure, its mission, vision, and philosophy statements.
      • Use systems theory and systems thinking to explain the gap or conflict.SWOT Analysis:Use the SWOT Analysis Template linked in Required Resources and include the SWOT analysis table in your paper.
    • Identify organizational factors that impact the situation using a SWOT analysis.
      • For example, a budget cut may cause short staffing, which relates directly to the problem.
      • What factors within the system may facilitate a solution for this problem?The Position:
    • Assess how the new nurse leader position will have power and influence and impact patient outcomes.
      • How will this position affect change within the organization?
    • Identify key leadership skills, knowledge, or abilities required for the position.Additional Requirements
    • Written communication: Written communication should be free of errors that detract from the overall message.
    • APA formatting: Resources and in-text citations should be formatted according to current APA style and formatting.
    • Length: The report should be 4–5 pages in content length. Include a separate title page and a separate reference page.
    • Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point, double-spaced.
    • Number of resources: Use a minimum of three peer-reviewed resources

ANA Code of Ethics Assignment

ANA Code of Ethics Assignment

APA Format, 2 page, 2 references

You are familiar with the ANA Code of Ethics and have a growing understanding of historical perspectives in ethical and legal considerations in research. Further, you know the BSN-prepared nurse has a different role than the PhD-prepared nurse, for example, in terms of research. ANA Code of Ethics Assignment. In this forum, consider what the responsibilities are for the BSN-prepared nurse, given your role in nursing research and evidence-based practice (EBP) processes. You should include the following:

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW

  • You are already applying the ANA Code of Ethics now in clinical practice. Why, then, must BSN-prepared RNs consider ethical and legal issues when it is the researchers themselves who are responsible for obtaining approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB)?
  • In terms of your EBP, where does the consideration of ethical and legal issues enter?
  • Many research reports do not extensively describe the ways in which the researcher(s) ensured ethical principles were applied during the study. What does that mean? How, then, would you best determine how well human subjects’ rights were protected?
  • Consider any research-related processes you have or could be involved with. Describe an ethical dilemma. This could be one you experienced or a hypothetical scenario. Explain how it was resolved or could be resolved. ANA Code of Ethics Assignment