Assignment Change Implementation
Assignment Change Implementation
reference page at least 4 not more 5 years ago)
Plagiarism free work…. Thank you
***Remember to follow the Grading Rubric and Instructions for this and all written assignments require APA formatting
Two Attached previous temples, that are related to this work, be guided by them to answer.
To Prepare:
- Review the Resources and identify one change that you believe is called for in your organization/workplace.
- This may be a change necessary to effectively address one or more of the issues you addressed in the Workplace Environment Assessment you submitted in Module 4. It may also be a change in response to something not addressed in your previous efforts. It may be beneficial to discuss your ideas with your organizational leadership and/or colleagues to help identify and vet these ideas. Assignment Change Implementation
- Reflect on how you might implement this change and how you might communicate this change to organizational leadership.
ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW
The Assignment (5-6-minute narrated PowerPoint presentation):
Change Implementation and Management Plan
Create a 5- or 6-slide narrated PowerPoint that presents a comprehensive plan to implement changes you propose.
Your narrated presentation should be 5–6 minutes in length.
Your Change Implementation and Management Plan should include the following:
- An executive summary of the issues that are currently affecting your organization/workplace (This can include the work you completed in your Workplace Environment Assessment previously submitted, if relevant.)
- A description of the change being proposed
- Justifications for the change, including why addressing it will have a positive impact on your organization/workplace
- Details about the type and scope of the proposed change
- Identification of the stakeholders impacted by the change
- Identification of a change management team (by title/role) Assignment Change Implementation
- A plan for communicating the change you propose
- A description of risk mitigation plans you would recommend to address the risks anticipated by the change you propose
Developing Leadership in Managers to Facilitate the Implementation of National Guideline Recommendations: A Process Evaluation of Feasibility and Usefulness (ijhpm.com)
Broome, M., & Marshall, E. S. (2021). Transformational leadership in nursing: From expert clinician to influential leader (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.
- Chapter 4, “Practice Model Design, Implementation, and Evaluation” (pp. 99–154)
Rubric
Excellent |
Good | Fair | Poor | |
| Create a 5- or 6-slide PowerPoint that presents a comprehensive plan to implement changes you propose. Your Change Implementation and Management Plan should include the following: · An executive summary of the issues that are currently affecting your organization/workplace (this can include the work you completed in your Workplace Environment Assessment). · A description of the changes being proposed. · Justifications for the changes, including why addressing them will have a positive impact on your organization/workplace. | Points Range:36 (36.00%) – 40 (40.00%)
The narrated presentation accurately and completely presents a comprehensive plan to implement proposed changes. The narrated presentation accurately and thoroughly describes the issues currently affecting the organization in an executive summary. The narrated presentation accurately and clearly describes the proposed changes. The narrated presentation accurately and clearly provides justifications for the changes, including why addressing them will have a positive impact on the organization. Assignment Change Implementation |
Points Range:32 (32.00%) – 35 (35.00%)
The narrated presentation adequately presents a comprehensive plan to implement proposed changes. The narrated presentation adequately describes the issues currently affecting the organization in an executive summary. The narrated presentation adequately describes the proposed changes. The narrated presentation adequately provides justifications for the changes, including why addressing them will have a positive impact on the organization. |
Points Range:28 (28.00%) – 31 (31.00%)
The narrated presentation vaguely, inaccurately, or incompletely presents a plan to implement proposed changes. The narrated presentation inaccurately or vaguely describes the issues currently affecting the organization in an executive summary. The narrated presentation inaccurately or vaguely describes the proposed changes. The narrated presentation inaccurately or vaguely provides justifications for the changes, including why addressing them will have a positive impact on the organization. |
Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 27 (27.00%)
The narrated presentation vaguely, inaccurately, and incompletely presents a plan to implement proposed changes. The narrated presentation inaccurately and vaguely describes the issues currently affecting the organization in an executive summary or executive summary is missing. The narrated presentation inaccurately and vaguely describes the proposed changes or proposed changes are missing. The narrated presentation inaccurately and vaguely provides justifications for the changes, including why addressing them will have a positive impact on the organization or justifications are missing. |
| · Details about the type and scope of the proposed changes. · Identification of the stakeholders impacted by the changes. · Identification of a change management team (by title/role). · A plan for communicating the changes you propose. · A description of risk mitigation plans you would recommend to address the risks anticipated by the changes you propose. | Points Range:27 (27.00%) – 30 (30.00%)
The narrated presentation accurately and thoroughly details the type and scope of the proposed changes. The narrated presentation accurately and clearly identifies the stakeholders impacted by the changes. The narrated presentation accurately and completely identifies a change management team by title/ role. The narrated presentation accurately and thoroughly proposes a detailed plan for communicating the changes proposed. The narrated presentation accurately and thoroughly describes recommended risk mitigation plans that address the risks anticipated by the changes proposed. |
Points Range:24 (24.00%) – 26 (26.00%)
The narrated presentation adequately details the type and scope of the proposed changes. The narrated presentation adequately identifies the stakeholders impacted by the changes. The narrated presentation adequately identifies a change management team by title/ role. The narrated presentation adequately proposes a detailed plan for communicating the changes proposed. The narrated presentation adequately describes recommended risk mitigation plans that address the risks anticipated by the changes proposed. |
Points Range:21 (21.00%) – 23 (23.00%)
The narrated presentation vaguely or inaccurately details the type and scope of the proposed changes. The narrated presentation vaguely or inaccurately identifies the stakeholders impacted by the changes. The narrated presentation vaguely or inaccurately identifies a change management team by title/ role. The narrated presentation vaguely or inaccurately proposes a detailed plan for communicating the changes proposed. The narrated presentation vaguely or inaccurately describes recommended risk mitigation plans that address the risks anticipated by the changes proposed. |
Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 20 (20.00%)
The narrated presentation vaguely and inaccurately details the type and scope of the proposed changes or proposed changes are missing. The narrated presentation vaguely and inaccurately identifies the stakeholders impacted by the changes or stakeholders are missing. The narrated presentation vaguely and inaccurately identifies a change management team by title/ role or change management team is missing. The narrated presentation vaguely and inaccurately proposes a detailed plan for communicating the changes proposed or communication plan is missing. The narrated presentation vaguely and inaccurately describes recommended risk mitigation plans that address the risks anticipated by the changes proposed or recommendations are missing. |
| Resource Synthesis | Points Range:5 (5.00%) – 5 (5.00%)
Using proper in-text citations, the response fully integrates at least 2 outside resources and 2 or 3 course-specific resources. PowerPoint presentation includes references slide. Assignment Change Implementation |
Points Range:4 (4.00%) – 4 (4.00%)
Using proper in-text citations, the response fully integrates at least 2 outside resources and 1 course-specific resource. PowerPoint presentation includes references slide. |
Points Range:3 (3.00%) – 3 (3.00%)
Using proper in-text citations, the response minimally integrates outside and course-specific resources. PowerPoint presentation includes references slide. |
Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 2 (2.00%)
The response does not integrate outside and course-specific resources or no in-text citations are used. References slide is incomplete or missing. |
| Presentation Narration | Points Range:10 (10.00%) – 10 (10.00%)
Narration is present. |
Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 0 (0.00%) | Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 0 (0.00%) | Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 0 (0.00%)
Narration is missing. |
| PowerPoint Presentation: The presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order. | Points Range:9 (9.00%) – 10 (10.00%)
The presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order. |
Points Range:8 (8.00%) – 8 (8.00%)
Eighty percent of the presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order. |
Points Range:7 (7.00%) – 7 (7.00%)
Sixty to seventy nine percent of the presentation follows these guidelines: presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order. |
Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 6 (6.00%)
Less than sixty percent of the presentation follows these guidelines: presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order. |
| Written Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation. | Points Range:5 (5.00%) – 5 (5.00%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. |
Points Range:4 (4.00%) – 4 (4.00%)
Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. |
Points Range:3 (3.00%) – 3 (3.00%)
Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. |
Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 2 (2.00%)
Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. |
Part 1: Work Environment
With a score of 80, my workplace can be classified as moderately healthy under the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory. This means that the organization is performing quite good in promoting the provisioning of quality care while addressing the needs and concerns of its employees. Notably, the organization has performed best in their communication skills, appreciating the work of employees, providing them training, valuing their employees, and awarding exemplary by all employees despite their level in the organization. This a sign of a moderately healthy workplace. Of more significant importance, however, is that the organization posted very low scores in encouraging wellness among the employees and giving them reasonable workload that is distributed evenly among all staff members. These low scores show that the organization has performed poorly in these sections and this has had a negative impact on the healthy work environment. This is probably because, given the huge number of patients, employees have had to work longer shifts thereby ignoring their personal wellness.
The two things that surprised me most about the results is that the organization values its employees and that they work towards retaining the best minds within the institution. This finally made me understand why the organization has been putting in efforts in empowering and educating their staff. For instance, individuals can be given full scholarships to further their studies or conduct research that is relevant to the institution. By valuing the employees, the organization has strived to listen and give attention to their opinions. This has built resilience among the employees, even during events when one has to handle more workload. One idea that I believed prior to conducting the assessment that was confirmed is that most employees handle huge workloads and this has definitely affected their wellbeing. This is partially due to the increasing number of patients that keep visiting the institution and need urgent medical attention. Being a recognized institution for offering quality care, handling too many patients is the order of the day.
The results of the assessment suggest that the health and civility of my workplace is above average but not excellent. This is because the organization is still lagging behind in promoting the wellbeing of its employees and distributing the workload evenly. Therefore, to achieve excellence in civility and attaining a healthy workplace, more focus should be shifted to reducing employees’ workload. This can be achieved by hiring more staff and having the employees work in flexible shifts. This way, quality care will be provided and achieved in a healthy work environment. Assignment Change Implementation
ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW
Part 2: Reviewing the Literature
The selected article was authored by Clark & Griffin (2014). In this article, the authors have provided a discussion on how to implement the cognitive rehearsal technique/concept as an intervention against incivility and lateral violence in nursing. Cognitive rehearsal technique refers to an evidence-based practice/technique whereby nurses and health practitioners practice to handle stressful situations that they may experience in a non-threatening environment. For instance, nurses will practice how to make decisions when faced with dilemmas or how to handle troublesome patients whose health deterioration will affect their practice or reputation in the workplace. This training also includes how to handle stressful colleagues. Cognitive rehearsal technique is important to allow nurses function well and promote civility in a healthy workplace (Razzi & Bianchi, 2019).
The concept of cognitive rehearsal technique is related to the results of my assessment in various ways. For instance, it relates to how decision-making is achieved in the organization. Without involving all the appropriate stakeholders, conflicts may arise and this will affect the quality of care being provided. It also relates to how fair the employees are being treated. Unfairness often causes conflicts to arise and this requires non-violence and civility while addressing the conflicts. The cognitive rehearsal technique is also related to the communication aspect in the organization. Often, poor or one-sided communication may cause conflicts to arise.
The cognitive rehearsal technique can be applied to my workplace to further improve the organizational health and build stronger teams. For instance, whenever there is a misunderstanding in the workplace, the cognitive rehearsal technique can be implemented effectively to ensure that the misunderstanding is addressed professionally (Kile et al., 2019). In addition, considering the views of all employees while making decisions will enhance inclusivity and the employees will feel valued. The technique can also be used to help employees express their concerns and interests in a polite manner even when the points might be conflicting. Therefore, the individuals in the workplace will learn and gradually implement the cognitive rehearsal technique. Assignment Change Implementation
Part 3: Evidence-Based Strategies to Create High-Performance Inter-Professional Teams
The Work Environment Assessment revealed that the organization was performing poorly as workers were overworked or the workload was unevenly distributed and that the organization did not encourage its employees to take care of their personal health and wellbeing. To reduce overworking the staff and achieving an even distribution of the workload, the organization can invest in having the staff work in manageable shift hours. For instance, nurses can work an 8-hour shift then rest. This will allow every nurse ample time to rest and thus, offer quality work throughout their shift. In addition, the hospital is also advised to develop a schedule where teams handle different roles. This will be done on a rotational basis and allow the workload to be distributed evenly (Walter et al., 2017). For instance, if one team of nurses handle the maternity department this month, they will shift to the adults’ ward department the next month and thus work effectively while experiencing minimal fatigue. To encourage the employees, address their personal health and wellbeing, the hospital can provide wellness facilities in the workplace to enable the nurses exercise and remain fit. The hospital; can also provide healthy meal options for the workers to enable them achieve good health in the long-term (Rose et al., 2017).
To promote successful practices as revealed in the Work Environment Assessment, institutions need to invest in educating and empowering their staff. This will allow their employees to achieve successful practices that, in turn, will reflect positively to the said institutions. This can be achieved by offering them training and sponsoring them to further their studies. Another important aspect to implement is striving to employ and retain the best minds in the different practices. Given their years of experience, such individuals will continue to offer quality care and also offer mentorship to junior employees who would later walk in their steps. This way, successful practices will be achieved as long as the institution continues to operate.
References
Griffin, M., & Clark, C. M. (2014). Revisiting cognitive rehearsal as an intervention against
incivility and lateral violence in nursing: 10 years later. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 45(12), 535-542.
Kile, D., Eaton, M., deValpine, M., & Gilbert, R. (2019). The effectiveness of education and
cognitive rehearsal in managing nurse‐to‐nurse
Razzi, C. C., & Bianchi, A. L. (2019). Incivility in nursing: Implementing a quality
improvement program utilizing cognitive rehearsal training. In Nursing forum (Vol. 54, No. 4, pp. 526-536).
Ross, A., Bevans, M., Brooks, A. T., Gibbons, S., & Wallen, G. R. (2017). Nurses and
health-promoting behaviors: Knowledge may not translate into self-care. AORN journal, 105(3), 267-275.
Walter, S. R., Raban, M. Z., Dunsmuir, W. T., Douglas, H. E., & Westbrook, J. I. (2017).
Emergency doctors’ strategies to manage competing workload demands in an interruptive environment: An observational workflow time study. Applied ergonomics, 58, 454-460. Assignment Change Implementation
