NU-668Week 14 Discussion 1: Practical/Clinical Issue
NU-668Week 14 Discussion 1: Practical/Clinical Issue
Value: 100 points
Due: In an effort to facilitate scholarly discourse, create your initial post by Day 3 and reply to at least two of your classmates, on two separate days, by Day 7.
Grading Category: Discussions
Initial Post
- After reviewing the 2012 QSEN Graduate Competencies (PDF), identify a quality/safety issue that you have seen in your practice or clinical setting.
- Explain to your classmates the issue you have identified and the reasons why it is an issue. Include the potential negative outcomes that can arise if the issue is not resolved.
- For example, you notice that the provider is not following the American Cancer Society’s recommendation for cervical cancer screening. This issue in quality competency can lead to under-testing, over-testing, increased cost, and increased potential for surgical procedures. These factors can have negative consequences, such as higher risk for preterm labor or infertility.
- As you create your post, review the knowledge, skills, and attitudes of the relevant competency regarding the quality/safety issue you have identified. NU-668Week 14 Discussion 1: Practical/Clinical Issue
- Remember: The material and feedback from this assignment will be used in Week 15 Assignment 1: SWOT Analysis.
Reply Posts
- Using the SWOT Analysis Resource, review two classmates’ posts.
- Identify two items from each of the four components (S,W,O,T) that is relevant to the problem your classmate identified. Explain your reasoning for each.
To reply to the example in the initial post, you could select advantages of the proposition and financial reserves from the Strengths quadrant. Elaborate on the advantages of following the recommendations—for example, following professional standards of equal care, decreasing cost by not ordering unnecessary diagnostic tests, and increasing revenue from shorter visit times.
ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW
Items you might identify from the Weakness quadrant could include processes and systems, and morale commitment and leadership. These items are weaknesses because of the need to train providers on national recommendations and to create a system within the EMR to track PAP smears.
You should then choose two items from both the Opportunities quadrant and the Threats quadrant and include them in your reply post. NU-668Week 14 Discussion 1: Practical/Clinical Issue
Please refer to the Grading Rubric for details on how this activity will be graded. The grading for the number of reply posts is based on individual Discussion Board instructions. If the rubric indicates a different number for reply posts, you will not be graded down, as long as you have followed the reply post instructions.
For the assignment to be considered complete, make sure that you address all prompts in your initial post by Day 3 and reply to at least two classmates by Day 7.
Posting to the Discussion Forum
- Select the appropriate Thread.
- Select Reply.
- Create your post.
- Select Post to Forum.
Week 14: Learning Materials
Readings
Required
- Buppert, C. (2021). Nurse practitioner’s business practice and legal guide (7th ed.). Jones and Bartlett Publishers.
- Chapter 14: Standards of Care for Nurse Practitioner Practice
- Chapter 15: Measuring Nurse Practitioner Performance
Required Resources
- Committee on Quality Health Care in America. Institute of Medicine. (2001). Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. National Academy Press.
- Download the PDF of the book for free and browse the chapters for highlights of the report and recommendations.
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). (2018, November). Six domains of health care quality.
- American Association of Colleges of Nursing Education Consortium. (2012, September 24). Graduate-level QSEN competencies: Knowledge, skills and attributes (PDF) NU-668Week 14 Discussion 1: Practical/Clinical Issue