Personality Assessment in Public Health Leadership

Personality Assessment in Public Health Leadership

According to the Human metric Jung Typology Test the following are my personality test results:

Extravert – 44%

Intuitive – 59%

Feeling – 12%

Judging – 62%

 

Healthcare environment requires effective leadership that can foster better health care outcomes among patients. To realize better healthcare outcomes, public health leaders must play a fundamental role in shaping the healthcare environment in a manner that can enhance efficient medical outcome (Vernon, 2014). Healthcare is one of the most important sectors in any given economy since the productivity of any nation is highly dependent on how healthy its population is. In the changing healthcare environment, effective leadership is required of healthcare leaders so as to foster better health care outcomes within communities. It is imperative to note that leaders acquire different leadership traits some of which are necessary for ensuring effective and efficient public health leadership (Vernon, 2014). My leadership assessment in Jung Typology indicates that I possess judging personality in my leadership style. Personality Assessment in Public Health Leadership

Focusing on the judging personality, this approach of leadership entails organizing and prior planning to achieve the organizational goals and objectives. Individuals with judging personality tend to get their sense of control through taking charge of their environment and making first choices. It is one of the most important leadership traits that foster effective leadership outcome within any healthcare setting. Leaders are required to be self-disciplined and decisive (Hautala, 2006). Leaders with judging leadership traits are often self-discipline and seek closure in all decisions that they make about the organization. Judging leaders are particular, and when they ask for something, they often mean it and require their followers to cooperate. Judgers approach life in a more structured way than perceivers. In their leadership style, they often need people to cooperate and work towards the realization of the organizational goals and objectives. Within the healthcare setting, the primary goals and objectives of the corporate leaders are to foster efficient health care outcome among the diverse population. Patients expect their organizational leaders to work towards satisfying their health care needs and this is what judgers do within any healthcare setting (Hautala, 2006).

From the Jung Typology leadership personality assessment, it is evident that I have moderate preference of extraversion over introversion. It was also clear that I have distinct preference of intuition over sensing, at the same time, I have slight preference of feeling over thinking and distinct preference of judging over perceiving. Below is an in depth discussion of the four aspects of my personality as revealed from the assessment.

Extravert

This is the first psychological preference of Jung typology personality types. According to Jung, extraversion and introversion refer to the attitudes people use to direct their energy. An extravert source and directs his or her energy mainly in the external world. Extraverts will tend to be more into associating with people in the outer world and in this case these people will always be outgoing and relate more effectively with groups (Hautala, 2006). These people feel more comfortable working in groups and have a broad range of friends. The assessment revealed that I have 44% extraversion which is a moderate preference of extraversion over introversion. In this case, this personality trait will help a great deal in improving population health as they foster productive relationship necessary for improving healthcare outcome among the population. Personality Assessment in Public Health Leadership

ORDER   A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER   NOW

Intuitive

Intuition and sensing are the second criteria on the Jung typology personality assessment, and they represent the techniques by people perceive information. My assessment revealed that I have 59% intuition I tend to believe on information received through assessment and evaluation in making decisions and not direct information from the external world. It is important to undertake a thorough examination of the information received from the external so as make rational and well-informed decisions (Hautala, 2006).

Feeling

Feeling versus thinking is the third criterion in the Jung typology and represents how an individual processes information. Thinking, in a nutshell, means that a person makes decision through the use of logic and not a mere sense of feeling. On the other hand, the feeling is where by an individual makes decisions based on his or her feelings and emotions. From my assessment, I possess 12% feeling meaning that I rely mostly on logical thinking when making decisions (Hautala, 2006). It is important to think logically in regards to the underlying scenario when making any decision within the organization. Building on feeling may result from making irrational decisions that may impact negatively on the organization.

Judging

This is the last criterion in Jung typology, and it represents how an individual implements the information that has been processed within the external environment. As noted above, judging is all about how an individual organizes himself including his life events and sticks to his or her plans for making decisions within the organization (Hautala, 2006).

 

 

Reference

Hautala, T. M. (2006). The relationship between personality and transformational leadership. Journal of Management Development, 25(8), 777-794.

Vernon, P. E. (2014). Personality Tests and Assessments (Psychology Revivals). Routledge.

 

 

NSG4029 W2A2 Rubric

 

APA references not formatted correctly -2

 

Rubric asked for 2  JOURNAL ARTICLES -10

 

	Unsatisfactory  1	Emerging  2	Proficient  3	Exemplary  4	Score
Assignment Components
Integrated how your specific personality type can enhance or hinder effective leadership in the health care environment.	How a specific personality type can enhance or hinder effective leadership in the health care environment was not reflected in the assignment.	Identified but not described how a specific personality type can enhance or hinder effective leadership in the health care environment.	Identified and briefly described with missing elements of how a specific personality type can enhance or hinder effective leadership in the health care environment.	Identified correctly and thoroughly described how a specific personality type can enhance or hinder effective leadership in the health care environment.	[Score x 10 = 40 pts]
Explained all four aspects of your personality gleaned from the assessment.	Assignment identified one aspect from assessment.	Identification of two or three aspects from assessment.	Identification of four aspects from assessment but missed some elements.	Identified and thoroughly explained four aspects from assessment.	[Score x 5 = 20 pts]
Included at least 2 journal article references. Personality Assessment in Public Health Leadership	Assignment included one journal article reference	Included two references but were not credible or peer reviewed.	Included two journal article references from a peer-reviewed article.	Included two or more journal article reference from a peer-reviewed article.	[Score x 5 = 20 pts]
Written Components
Organization Introduction Thesis Transitions Conclusion	Introduction is limited or missing entirely.    The paper lacks a thesis statement.   Transitions are infrequent, illogical, or missing entirely.   Conclusion is limited or missing entirely.	Introduction is present but incomplete or underdeveloped.    The paper is loosely organized around a thesis that may have to be inferred.   Transitions are sporadic.   Conclusion is present, but incomplete or underdeveloped.	Introduction has a clear opening, provides background  information, and states the topic.   The paper is organized around an arguable, clearly stated thesis statement.   Transitions are appropriate and help the flow of ideas.   Conclusion summarizes main argument and has a clear ending.	Introduction catches the reader’s attention, provides compelling  and appropriate background info, and clearly states the topic.   The paper is well organized around an arguable, focused thesis. Thoughtful transitions clearly show how ideas relate.   Conclusion leaves the reader with a sense of closure and provides concluding insights.	[Score x 2 = 8 pts]
Usage and Mechanics Grammar Spelling  Sentence structure	Writing contains numerous errors in spelling, grammar, and/or sentence structure that severely interferes with readability and comprehension.	Errors in spelling and grammar exist that somewhat interfere with readability and/or comprehension.	Writing follows conventions of spelling and grammar throughout. Errors are infrequent and do not interfere with readability or comprehension.	The paper is basically error free in terms of mechanics. Grammar and mechanics help establish a clear idea and aid the reader in following the writer’s logic.	[Score x 2 =8 pts]
APA Elements Attribution Paraphrasing Quotations	No attempt at APA  format.	APA format is attempted to paraphrase, quote, and cite, but errors are significant.	Using APA format, accurately paraphrased, quoted,  and cited in many spots throughout when appropriate or called for. Errors present are somewhat minor.	Using APA format, accurately paraphrased, quoted, and cited throughout the presentation when appropriate or called  for. Only a few minor errors present.	[Score x 1 = 4 pts]
				Subtotal
Timeliness					Late Work penalty:
				Total Score	/ 100