Stakeholder Environment for Tesla Inc Case Study

Stakeholder Environment for Tesla Inc Case Study

Stakeholder Environment for Tesla Inc Case Study

******CASE STUDY***** Rothaermel, F. T., & Zimmer, E. (2014). Tesla Motors (in 2013): Will sparks fly in the automobile industry? (McGraw-Hill Education Case No. 0077645065).

To develop effective strategies, a business must thoroughly understand its ecosystem, and the stakeholders within it, that can affect its success. To this end, effective businesses often analyze the political, economic, social, and technological forces (sometimes called P.E.S.T. analysis) and perform a comprehensive stakeholder analysis. Businesses can use each analysis to survey opportunities for strategic action, as well as to evaluate threats to current resource capabilities and strategies. Stakeholder Environment for Tesla Inc Case Study

 

This week, you use a large-scale, industry-level case study to analyze critical forces and stakeholder interests and needs that shape the ecosystem of an organization and industry. You then examine the strategic implications of the critical forces and stakeholder analyses concepts as they apply to your Capstone Strategy Playbook.

Stakeholder Analysis of Tesla Motors

P.E.S.T. analysis is an important way to capture the general forces that affect industries and companies. Another way to obtain a more comprehensive perspective of the general ecosystem that a company like Tesla Motors works within, is to identify, as explicitly as possible, all the stakeholders that have an interest in a given business.

ORDER   A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER   NOW

You might want to think about this from the “outside-in.” That is, given each of the major P.E.S.T. forces noted above, ask yourself, “Who are the people (stakeholders) behind each major force and how must I relate to them strategically?” So, for example, it is clear that international and national political figures may be relevant stakeholders in any given case, as would government regulators at local, regional, national, or international levels. You can’t change a local, regional, or national/international regulation directly—you have to know who to see and the action occurs among people—so a stakeholder analysis is, in many ways, a “personified” version of your P.E.S.T. analysis. Stakeholder Environment for Tesla Inc Case Study.

To prepare for this Discussion:

  • Review all required readings, including the Weekly Briefing, which provides additional guidance on how to complete the Assignment.
  • Review this week’s case study. You can, and should, scan it multiple times.
  • Identify and review all relevant readings from the MBA Program Capstone Bibliography.
  • Consider the elements of P.E.S.T. analysis that you learned earlier in the MBA program. These elements include:
    • Political (Legislative) and Legal Elements (regulatory environment, market access, technology regulation, zoning restrictions, industry specific, company specific legislation, anti-trust laws, insurance/liability requirements, safety regulations, child workforce protection laws, immigration laws, etc.)
    • Economic Elements (interest rate and equity market movements, capital liquidity, inflation prospects, exchange rate movements, workforce availability, discretionary income levels, etc.)
    • Societal Values and Ethics (risk taking propensity, family dynamics and behavior, cultural “in” behaviors, taboo activities, media focus, religious behaviors, ethical limitations on business, etc.)
    • Technology Elements (materials technology advances, electronics advances, communications advances, infrastructure access [communication, electricity, etc.], energy advances, etc.)And an important and too often forgotten element:
    • Demographic Changes (age distribution and trend, absolute population size and trend, birth and death rates, gender proportion and trend, ethnic mix and trend, location/mobility and trends.)
  • Identify, as explicitly as possible, all the relevant stakeholders that have an interest in Tesla Motors, and how Tesla should manage them as part of a strategy. Stakeholder Environment for Tesla Inc Case Study
  • Research your stakeholder list initially this way, to ensure complete coverage:
    • General Ecosystem Stakeholders (the ones that are behind the specific P.E.S.T. influences, includes the press, interest groups, the public at large, communities, shareholders, etc.)
    • Industry Level Stakeholders (direct local competitors, potential substitute companies, other competitors or potential competitors outside your current markets, lenders, alliance or potential alliance partners, trade associations, suppliers in the entire supply chain, customers and their end-users, potential customers or end users, etc.)
    • Internal Stakeholders (these are the people who influence the company from inside, including the board of directors, senior leadership, management, skilled employees at any level, other employees, contract workforce, outsourced workforce, potential new recruits, etc.)
    • Potential New Stakeholders (at any level, but which may become stakeholders as you consider new strategic actions and activities)
  • Then, reorder and rank the stakeholder list in order of “influence priority,” where stakeholders at the top of the prioritized list require more of Tesla Motor’s attention because they can/will influence your strategic choices for the future the most.

BY DAY 3

Post an assessment of the stakeholder environment for Tesla (and the U.S. automobile industry) that includes a comprehensive and prioritized list of stakeholders and explains who the key stakeholders are that Tesla Motors must pay attention to and why; and then offers specific strategies for how Tesla must seek to manage or otherwise, legally and ethically, influence these stakeholders.

General Guidance: Your original post, due by Day 3, will typically be approximately 1 single-spaced page in length (cut and pasted into the Discussion) as a general expectation/estimate. Refer to the Week 4 Discussion 1 rubric for grading elements and criteria. Your Instructor will use the rubric to assess your work. Stakeholder Environment for Tesla Inc Case Study

Herzing University Kolkaba Comfort Theory Essay

Herzing University Kolkaba Comfort Theory Essay

Herzing University Kolkaba Comfort Theory Essay

Instructions

The purpose of the Theory Evaluation Paper is to help you critically evaluate a middle-range nursing theory. This assignment will be completed using the three stages of the theory evaluation process: Theory Description, Theory Analysis, and Theory Evaluation.

  1. Select a Middle-Range Nursing Theory- Select one specific middle-range nursing theory from your textbook that best suits your area of practice. (Ex. Pender’s Health Promotion Model, Kolcaba’s Comfort Theory, Beck’s Postpartum Depression Theory, etc.)
  2. APA Student Title Page- (No Abstract Needed)
  • Include the following information on the Student title page in 7th APA format:
    • Assignment name in Bold Font: (Ex. Theory Evaluation Paper: Swanson’s Theory of Caring)
    • Skip a Line
    • Your Name
    • Name of University
    • Course Number and Name
    • Instructor’s Name
    • Date of Submission (Month, Day, Year)
  1. Introductory paragraph Capture the reader’s attention (ex. Grabbing statistics) and discuss the rationalefor selecting the specific nursing theory for your area of nursing over other nursing theories (Do not write in first person; Include a purpose/thesis statement of what you will describe in the paper as the last sentence of the introductory paragraph.) Next, begin the Body of Paper. Herzing University Kolkaba Comfort Theory Essay
  2. Theory Description (Level 1 Header)
  • Purpose (Level 2 Header); (Designate as Descriptive, Explanatory, Predictive, or Prescriptive; Include Scope-middle-range)
  • Concepts (Level 2 Header); (Introduce and list main concepts)
  • Definitions (Level 2 Header); (Define concepts and other important aspects)
  • Relationship (Level 2 Header); (Describe relationship among concepts)
  • Structure (Level 2 Header); (Describe; Is there a diagram of structure?)
  • Assumptions (Level 2 Header); (beliefs, propositions of the theory)

    ORDER   A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER   NOW

5. Theory Analysis (Level 1 Header)

  • Theory’s Origin (Level 2 Header); (historical creation and evolution of theory)
  • Unique Focus (Level 2 Header); (distinctive views)
  • Content (Level 2 Header); (include definitions of metaparadigm concepts of person, environment, health, and nursing)

6. Theory Evaluation (Level 1 Header)

  • Significance (Level 2 Header); (usefulness, social significance, cultural significance)
  • Comprehensiveness (Level 2 Header); (of the content, thoroughness, utility)
  • Logical Congruence (Level 2 Header); (consistency and clarity of theory; consistent use of concepts throughout the literature)
  • Credibility (Level 2 Header); (legitimacy, empirical support through research)
  • Contribution to Nursing (Level 2 Header); (usefulness to nursing practice, education, and research)

7. Conclusion (Level 1 Header) Conclusion paragraph with concluding statements to summarize the content and re-state or re-phrase the purpose/thesis statement. Herzing University Kolkaba Comfort Theory Essay

8. APA Reference Page- Please be sure to support your paper with in-text citations. Please use 5 peer-reviewed resources.

Additional Instructions: Your assignment should be typed into a Word or other word processing document, formatted in APA style. Paper should be a minimum of 4-5 pages in length, excluding the title and references pages. You may increase the number of pages of the body of the paper up to 7-8 pages if needed. This is a scholarly paper and should not be written in first person. Paragraphs should have a minimum of 3 sentences. Paraphrasing should be done using in-text citations. Direct quotes should be rare and used only when the content can be said in no other way. If using direct quotes, you must include page or paragraph number.

Estimated time to complete: 8 to 10 hours

THIS PART BELOW THIS LINE IS THE THEORY I PICKED FROM THE BOOK I PICKED KOLCABA THEORY—————————————————————–

Kolcaba’s Theory of Comfort ,

Katherine Kolcaba (2017) wrote that the first step in developing the Theory of Comfort was a concept analysis conducted in 1988 while she was a graduate student. Following a number of steps over several years, the Theory of Comfort was initially published in 1994 and later modified (Kolcaba, 1994, 2001).

Purpose and Major Concepts

Kolcaba (1994) defined comfort within nursing practice as “the satisfaction (actively, passively, or co-operatively) of the basic human needs for relief, ease, or transcendence arising from health care situations that are stressful” (p. 1178). She explained that a client’s needs arise from a stimulus situation that can cause negative tension. Increasing comfort measures can result in having negative tensions reduced and positive tensions engaged. Comfort is viewed as an outcome of care that can promote or facilitate health-seeking behaviors. It is posited that increasing comfort can enhance health-seeking behaviors. One proposition notes that “if enhanced comfort is achieved, patients, family members and/or nurses are strengthened to engage in HSBs [health-seeking behaviors], which further enhance comfort” (Kolcaba, 2017, p. 200).

ORDER   A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER   NOW

Major concepts described in the Theory of Comfort include comfort, comfort care, comfort measures, comfort needs, health-seeking behaviors, institutional integrity, and intervening variables. There are also eight defined propositions that link the defined concepts (Box 11-6) (Kolcaba, 2001, 2017). Figure 11-4 presents the Theory of Comfort. Herzing University Kolkaba Comfort Theory Essay

Box 11-6 Propositions of Comfort Theory

1. Nurses and members of the health care team identify comfort needs of patients and family members.

2. Nurses design and coordinate interventions to address comfort needs.

3. Intervening variables are considered when designing interventions.

4. When interventions are delivered in a caring manner and are effective, the outcome of enhanced comfort is attained.

5. Patients, nurses, and other health care team members agree on desirable and realistic health-seeking behaviors.

6. If enhanced comfort is achieved, patients, family members, and/or nurses are more likely to engage in health-seeking behaviors; these further enhance comfort.

7. When patients and family members are given comfort care and engage in health-seeking behaviors, they are more satisfied with health care and have better health-related outcomes.

8. When patients, families, and nurses are satisfied with health care in an institution, public acknowledgment about that institution’s contributions to health care will help the institution remain viable and flourish. Evidence-based practice or policy improvements may be guided by these propositions and the theoretical framework.

Herzing University Kolkaba Comfort Theory Essay

Sources: Kolcaba (2001, 2017).

Figure 11-4The conceptual framework for the Theory of Comfort.
(© Kolcaba [2007]. Used with permission. http://thecomfortline.com.)

Context for Use and Nursing Implications

Comfort Theory observes that patients experience needs for comfort in stressful health care situations. Some of these needs are identified by the nurse, who then implements interventions to meet the needs (Kolcaba, 1995). Kolcaba (2017) stated that “Comfort Theory can be adapted to any health care setting or age group . . . ” (p. 200). Understanding of comfort can promote nursing care that is holistic and inclusive of physical, psychospiritual, social, and environmental interventions. It is noted that any actually unhappy, unhealthy, or unwell patients can be made more comfortable (Kolcaba, 1994). Finally, outcomes of comfort can be measurable, holistic, positive, and nurse sensitive.

Evidence of Empirical Testing and Application in Practice

The General Comfort Questionnaire (GCQ) is a 48-item Likert-type scale that was developed to measure concepts and propositions described in the theory. The GCQ has been modified to be used for different populations in a number of studies, and a shortened GCQ (28 items) is also in use (Kolcaba, 2017).

Kolcaba (2017) described development of other tools to assist in research and practice application for the Theory of Comfort. These include the Verbal Rating Scale Questionnaire, the Radiation Therapy Comfort Questionnaire, the Hospice Comfort Questionnaire, the Urinary Incontinence and Frequency Comfort Questionnaire, and the Healing Touch Comfort Questionnaire. In addition, the Comfort Behaviors Checklist was developed to measure comfort in patient who can’t use traditional questionnaires or other instruments. Herzing University Kolkaba Comfort Theory Essay

A number of research studies have been conducted by Kolcaba and her colleagues using the instruments listed earlier. For example, Andersen, Jylli, and Ambuel (2014)used Kolcaba’s Comfort Behaviors Checklist to evaluate the comfort care provided by a group of health providers and Seyedfatemi, Rafii, Rezaei, and Kolcaba (2014) used her instruments to study comfort and hope among preoperative patients. Whitehead, Anderson, Redican, and Stratton (2010)reported using Kolcaba’s instruments to study the effects of an end-of-life nursing education program on nurses’ death anxiety, knowledge of the dying process, and related concerns. Also examining nursing care at the end of life, Murray (2010) used Kolcaba’s instruments to assess spiritual beliefs and practices of nurses caring for patients at the end of life, along with similarities and differences in spiritual beliefs and practices comparing hospice nurses and nurses working on oncology and other special care units.

In practice-specific examples, Marchuk (2016) described how Comfort Theory can be applied in end-of-life care in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), and Krinsky, Murillo, and Johnson (2014) explained how comfort measures can be used to improve nursing care for cardiac patients. Finally, Boudiab and Kolcaba (2015) presented a comprehensive look at the application of Comfort Theory in directing holistic, quality care for veterans and their families.

Lenz and Colleagues’ Theory of Unpleasant Symptoms

The Theory of Unpleasant Symptoms was developed by a group of nurses interested in a variety of nursing issues, including symptom management, theory development, and nursing science (Lenz, Pugh, Milligan, & Gift, 2017). The theory was initially published in the nursing literature in the mid-1990s (Lenz et al., 1995) and then updated a few years later (Lenz et al., 1997). The theory was based on the premise that there are commonalities in experiencing different symptoms among different groups and in different situations. The theory was developed to integrate existing knowledge about a variety of symptoms to better prepare nurses in symptom management.

Purpose and Major Concepts

The purpose of the Theory of Unpleasant Symptoms is “to improve understanding of the symptom experience in various contexts and to provide information useful for designing effective means to prevent, ameliorate, or manage unpleasant symptoms and their negative effects” (Lenz & Pugh, 2014, p. 166). Lenz and colleagues (1997) reported that the theory has three major components: (1) the symptoms that the individual is experiencing, (2) the influencing factors that produce or affect the symptom experience, and (3) the consequences of the symptom experience.

Within the theory, symptoms are described in terms of duration, intensity, distress, and quality. Influencing factors can be physiologic factors, psychological factors, and/or situational factors. Performance is described in terms of functional status, cognitive functioning, or physical performance (Lenz et al., 2017). Figure 11-5depicts the Theory of Unpleasant Symptoms .Herzing University Kolkaba Comfort Theory Essay

Community Health in Nursing Assignment

Community Health in Nursing Assignment

Question Description

Within the Sentinel City simulation, you need to visit 12 locations within the areas of the city. Use the camera located in Sentinel City to take a picture of each location and label the picture with the location title. You may want to add any of your observations to the label for easy reference. When you take pictures, the simulation website will automatically create a PDF report. Mouse over the bottom of your saved image for the icon with the downward-pointing arrow: Community Health in Nursing Assignment

ORDER   A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER   NOW

Figure 6.2

Clicking this icon will save the report to your desktop. Save the file so you can submit it as an assessment task in Taskstream at the end of the course. When you visit the Family Support and Apartment Assessments page, you can either submit your work directly, or download your work as a PDF and submit. 

Here are the locations you are required to visit and take pictures of:

  • Interfaith Church of Sentinel City
  • Better Health Clinic
  • Sentinel City Department of Transportation
  • Sentinel City School District
  • ABC Daycare
  • Sentinel City Affordable Housing Project
  • City Hall
  • Radio BUZZ 96.5FM
  • Sentinel City Healthcare System
  • Lilly’s
  • Joe’s Grocery
  • Sentinel City Department of Parks and Recreation

Learn and Reflect

Reflecting on your learning has been proven to enhance your ability to learn, remember and successfully apply what you’ve learned in your future clinical setting. Take a few moments and respond to the following in your learning journal:

  • Describe your experience working in a simulated environment. Challenges? Issues?
  • What have you learned in Sentinel City that will contribute to your community assessment strategies in the future?
  • Write a summary of this unit in your own words listing the most critical things you’ve learned.
  • Describe an ‘aha’ moment…. Community Health in Nursing Assignment

Knowledge Assignment: Fall Prevention

Knowledge Assignment: Fall Prevention

Mrs. L is an 89-year-old widow who lives independently in her home. Although Mrs. L does not currently take any medications, she has gone through other medical conditions that put her at risk of fall. The medical conditions that put her at risk for fall are Bilateral hip replacements, Detached retina × 2 (right eye), Osteoarthritis, Depression, Orthostatic hypotension, Falls at home × 1, Urinary frequency, and Insomnia (sleeps about 3 hours per night). Since Mrs. L was admitted to the hospital, it is the nurses’ responsibility to do a comprehensive assessment of the patient and implement the appropriate care plan. According to The Hendrich II Fall Risk Model, the patient scores 11, which means a high risk for falls (Hendrich, 2016). In The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Mrs. L scored 17 with a range of 0-21 points, “0” indicating no difficulty and “21” indicating severe difficulty in all areas (Buysse et al., 1989), which put her at a high risk of losing balance and falling. Another fall indicator was her Mini-Cog screening for cognitive impairment. Mrs. L scored 2 out of 5, which means she is experiencing dementia, which is also an important contributor to falls (Borson, n.d.). Knowledge Assignment: Fall Prevention

ORDER   A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER   NOW

 

To implement safety goals for Mrs. L in the Environmental and equipment category, we need to make sure that her room is clean and all the wires are tacked away from her walkway. Also, emphasizing using a call light during the hospital stay is important. Regarding gait and mobility, we should encourage the patient to use a walker and wear her non-skidding socks all time. Moreover, when the patient is prescribed new medications, especially for geriatric dementia patients, we need to emphasize using a daily pill box that organizes the medications for each day to avoid forgetting or overdosing. We need to help patients in practicing relaxation techniques such as applied relaxation, progressive muscle relaxation, cue controlled relaxation; mindful breathing; biofeedback) to reduce their depression and anxiety. Knowledge Assignment: Fall Prevention 

 

References

Borson, S. (n.d.) Mini-Cog screening for cognitive impairment in older adults. Retrieved from https://mini-cog.com/

Buysse, D. J., Reynolds, C. F., Monk, T. H., Berman, S. R., & Kupfer, D. J. (1989). The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Retrieved from http://www.sleep.pitt.edu/research/ewExternalFiles/PSQI%20Instrument.pdf

Hendrich, A. (2016). Fall risk assessment for older adults: The Hendrich II Fall Risk model. Try This, 8. Retrieved from https://consultgeri.org/try-this/general-assessment/issue-8.pdf Knowledge Assignment: Fall Prevention

I need assistance

Can someone assist

Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation and Patient Case Presentation

APA 7 FORMAT ONLY SHOULD BE USEDNO PLAGIARISM ALLOWEDPLEASE NO INTERNET SOURCESONLY SCHOLARLY SOURCES SHOULD BE USEDSCHOLARLY SOURCES WITHIN 5 YEARS ONLY SHOULD BE USEDTHANKS…

CBT Discussion – 350 words

There are significant differences in the applications of cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) for families and individuals. The same is true for CBT in group settings and CBT in family settings. In your role, it is essential to understand these differences to appropriately apply this therapeutic approach across multiple settings. For this Discussion, as you compare the use of CBT in individual, group, and family settings, consider challenges of using this approach with groups you may lead, as well as strategies for overcoming those challenges.Post an explanation of how the use of CBT in groups compares to its use in family or individual settings. Explain at least two challenges PMHNPs might encounter when using CBT in one of these settings. Support your response with specific examples from this week’s media and at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources. Explain why each of your supporting sources is considered scholarly and attach the PDFs of your sources.

Socw 6510 Week 7 Assignment 2 Practice Problem essay assignment

Socw 6510 Week 7 Assignment 2 Practice Problem essay assignment

Evidence based practice is essential to effective social work practice. For this assignment, you are required to (a) identify a current practice problem relevant in your current agency (i.e., engaging clients when they don’t talk much, having negative perceptions about your client, counter), (b) after identifying your practice problem, conduct an extensive literature search as it relates to your practice problem that provides you with a complete understanding of the practice problem. Socw 6510 Week 7 Assignment 2 Practice Problem essay assignment

ORDER   A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER   NOW

Based on your findings in the literature, what did you discover that will help you address your practice problem? How might your research guide your work in your field agency?  After reviewing the literature/research and comparing it to the practice problem, the student is expected to do the following:

By Day 7

Submit a 1-2 page reflection paper that:

  1. Briefly discusses the literature
  2. Briefly identifies the practice problem
  3. Briefly explains how the literature will be used to address the practice problem while engaging in the agency.

NOTE: The goal is for you and the Field Instructor to have an open discussion regarding your identified problem while discussing evidenced based solutions to address them. Your field instructor will be evaluating your ability to demonstrate your competency in their field evaluation. In addition, you will submit this assignment for classroom credit. The Field Liaison will grade the assignment “PASS/FAIL,” see rubric for passing criteria. Socw 6510 Week 7 Assignment 2 Practice Problem essay assignment

Case Study: Evidence-Based Patient-Centered Concept Map essay assignment

Case Study: Evidence-Based Patient-Centered Concept Map essay assignment

Create a concept map graphic and write a 2-4 page narrative on the patient scenario presented in Assessment Case Study: Evidence-Based Patient-Centered Concept Map. Base your report on the information provided in the case study and your own research of 3-5 evidence-based resources.

Evidence-based practice is a key skill in the tool kit of the master’s-prepared nurse. Its goal is to ensure that health care practitioners are using the best available evidence to ensure that patients are receiving the best care possible (Godshall, 2015). In essence, evidence-based practice is all about ensuring quality care.

Case Study: Evidence-Based Patient-Centered Concept Map

In this assessment, you will apply evidence-based practice and personalized care concepts to ensure quality care and improve the health of a single patient. The concept map that you will create is an example of a visual tool that you can use for patient and family education. Case Study: Evidence-Based Patient-Centered Concept Map essay assignment

Demonstration of Proficiency

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:

Competency 1: Apply evidence-based practice to plan patient-centered care.
Analyze the needs of a patient, and those of their family, to make sure that the intervention in the concept map will be relevant and appropriate for their beliefs, values, and lifestyle.
Design an individualized, patient-centered concept map, based upon the best available evidence for treating a patient’s specific health, economic, and cultural needs.
Competency 3: Evaluate outcomes of evidence-based interventions.
Propose relevant and measurable criteria for evaluating the outcomes the patient needs to achieve.
Competency 4: Evaluate the value and relative weight of available evidence upon which to make a clinical decision.
Determine the value and relevance of evidence used as the basis of a patient-centered concept map.
Competency 5: Synthesize evidence-based practice and academic research to communicate effective solutions.
Develop a strategy for communicating with patients and their families in an ethical, culturally sensitive, and inclusive way. Case Study: Evidence-Based Patient-Centered Concept Map essay assignment
Integrate relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.
Reference

Godshall, M. (2015). Fast facts for evidence-based practice in nursing: Implementing EBP in a nutshell (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company.

ORDER   A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER   NOW

Scenario

The charge nurse at the wellness center has sent you an email to request that you review a patient file before the patient arrives at the clinic. She has asked you to put together a concept map for your patient’s care plan. The concept map is intended to help you think through the best strategy for your patient’s care and for subsequent use for patient education. In addition, the nurse needs a narrative report that describes your patient with up to five diagnoses, in order of urgency.

Your Role

You are a nurse at a community wellness center who has received a request for patient case review and preparation for an upcoming appointment.

Instructions

Review the Assessment Case Study: Evidence-Based Patient-Centered Concept Map media activity.

Create your concept map and narrative as separate parts of your document. Be sure to note where you must include your evidence-based support and clarify your strategies for communicating information to the patient and the patient’s family.

Integrate relevant evidence from 3–5 current scholarly or professional sources to support your assertions.

Part 1: Concept Map

Develop a graphical concept map for the patient based on the best available evidence for treating your patient’s health, economic, and cultural needs.
Many organizations use the spider style of concept maps (see the Taylor and Littleton-Kearney article for an example).
The Assessment Case Study: Evidence-Based Patient-Centered Concept Map, which includes an example of a concept map, may help you prepare your assessment. Case Study: Evidence-Based Patient-Centered Concept Map essay assignment
If a particular style of concept map is used in your current care setting, you may use it in this assessment.
Part 2: Narrative Report

Develop a narrative (2–4 pages) for your concept map.
Analyze the needs of a patient and his or her family to ensure that the intervention in the concept map will be relevant and appropriate for their beliefs, values, and lifestyle.
Consider how your patient’s economic situation and relevant environmental factors may have contributed to your patient’s current condition or could affect future health.
Consider how your patient’s culture or family should inform your concept map.
Determine the value and relevance of the evidence you used as the basis of your concept map.
Explain why your evidence is valuable and relevant to your patient’s case.
Explain why each piece of evidence is appropriate for the health issue you are addressing and for the unique situation of your patient and the family.
Propose relevant and measurable criteria for evaluating the outcomes the patient needs to achieve.
Explain why your proposed criteria are appropriate and useful measures of success.
Explain how you will communicate specific aspects of the concept map to your patient and the family in an ethical, culturally sensitive, and inclusive way. Ensure that your strategies:
Promote honest communications.
Facilitate sharing only the information you are required and permitted to share.
Are mindful of your patient’s culture.
Enable you to make complex medical terms and concepts understandable to your patient and his or her family, regardless of language, abilities, or educational level. Case Study: Evidence-Based Patient-Centered Concept Map essay assignment
Additional Requirements