Nursing homework help

/in /by

Nursing homework help

Develop an intervention (your capstone project), as a solution to the patient, family, or population problem you’ve defined. Submit the proposed intervention to the faculty for review and approval. This solution needs to be implemented (shared) with your patient, family, or group. You are not to share your intervention with your patient, family, or group or move on to Assessment 5 before your faculty reviews/approves the solution you submit in Assessment 4. In a separate written deliverable, write a 5-7 page analysis of your intervention. Nursing homework help

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

Please submit both your solution/intervention and the 5-7 page analysis to complete Assessment 4.

Preparation

In this assessment, you’ll develop an intervention as a solution to the health problem you’ve defined. To prepare for the assessment, think about an appropriate intervention, based on your work in the preceding assessments, that will produce tangible, measurable results for the patient, family, or group. In addition, you might consider using a root cause analysis to explore the underlying reasons for a problem and as the basis for developing and implementing an action plan to address the problem. Some appropriate interventions include the following:

  • Creating an educational brochure.
  • Producing an educational voice-over PowerPoint presentation or video focusing on your topic.
  • Creating a teaching plan for your patient, family, or group.
  • Recommending work process or workflow changes addressing your topic.

Plan to spend at least 3 direct practicum hours working with the same patient, family, or group.

Instructions

Complete this assessment in two parts: (a) develop an intervention as a solution to the problem and (b) submit your proposed intervention, with a written analysis, to your faculty for review and approval.

Part 1

Develop an intervention, as a solution to the problem, based on your assessment and supported by data and scholarly, evidence-based sources.

Incorporate relevant aspects of the following considerations that shaped your understanding of the problem:

  • Leadership.
  • Collaboration.
  • Communication.
  • Change management.
  • Policy.
  • Quality of care.
  • Patient safety.
  • Costs to the system and individual.
  • Technology.
  • Care coordination.
  • Community resources.
Part 2

Submit your proposed intervention to your faculty for review and approval.

In a separate written deliverable, write a 5-7 page analysis of your intervention.

  • Summarize the patient, family, or population problem.
  • Explain why you selected this problem as the focus of your project.
  • Explain why the problem is relevant to your professional practice and to the patient, family, or group.

In addition, address the requirements outlined below. These requirements correspond to the scoring guide criteria for this assessment, so be sure to address each main point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. In addition, note the additional requirements for document format and length and for supporting evidence.

  • Define the role of leadership and change management in addressing the problem.
    • Explain how leadership and change management strategies influenced the development of your proposed intervention.
    • Explain how nursing ethics informed the development of your proposed intervention.
    • Include a copy of the intervention/solution/professional product.
  • Propose strategies for communicating and collaborating with the patient, family, or group to improve outcomes associated with the problem.
    • Identify the patient, family, or group.
    • Discuss the benefits of gathering their input to improve care associated with the problem.
    • Identify best-practice strategies from the literature for effective communication and collaboration to improve outcomes.
  • Explain how state board nursing practice standards and/or organizational or governmental policies guided the development of your proposed intervention.
    • Cite the standards and/or policies that guided your work.
    • Describe research that has tested the effectiveness of these standards and/or policies in improving outcomes for this problem.
  • Explain how your proposed intervention will improve the quality of care, enhance patient safety, and reduce costs to the system and individual.
    • Cite evidence from the literature that supports your conclusions.
    • Identify relevant and available sources of benchmark data on care quality, patient safety, and costs to the system and individual.
  • Explain how technology, care coordination, and the utilization of community resources can be applied in addressing the problem.
    • Cite evidence from the literature that supports your conclusions.
  • Write concisely and directly, using active voice.
  • Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references.
Additional Requirements
  • Format: Format the written analysis of your intervention using APA style. APA Style Paper Tutorial [DOCX] is provided to help you in writing and formatting your paper. Be sure to include:
    • A title page and reference page. An abstract is not required.
    • Appropriate section headings.
  • Length: Your paper should be approximately 5-7 pages in length, not including the reference page.
  • Supporting evidence: Cite at least five sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your central ideas. Resources should be no more than five years old. Provide in-text citations and references in APA format.
  • Proofreading: Proofread your paper, before you submit it, to minimize errors that could distract readers and make it more difficult for them to focus on its substance.

 

Nursing homework help

/in /by

Nursing homework help

Module 05 Content

MATERNAL CHILD DUE 7TH OF MAY

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

Top of Form

Purpose of Assignment

The goal of creating a newborn nutrition teaching presentation is to prepare the nursing student to provide evidenced based education to the pre and postpartum client on lactation.

Competency

Select safe, effective nursing interventions for the postpartum client and newborn.

Instructions

Create a teaching tool to promote breastfeeding. The material created to educate new mothers on breastfeeding will influence the mother’s decision to breastfeed, including duration, based on the quality and content of the teaching.

Assignment Requirements

Your teaching tool will be trifold and must include this relevant content for a mother considering the risks and benefits of breastfeeding a newborn.

    • Explain how breast milk is formed in the mammary glands and the physiology of breast milk
    • Include two 2020 National Health Goals related to newborn nutrition to support breastfeeding as the best choice. See the link below:
    • https://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topics-objectives/topic/maternal-infant-and-child-health
    • Discuss the advantages of breastfeeding related to immunities transferred to the newborn
    • Describe three additional benefits of breastfeeding with supporting rationales
    • Include at least two supporting resources
    • Document must be written

Format

    • Standard American English (correct grammar, punctuation, etc.)
    • Logical, original and insightful
    • Professional organization, style, and mechanics in APA format
    • Submit document through Grammarly to correct errors before submission

Resources

    • https://guides.rasmussen.edu/apa
    • How do I create a patient education brochure/pamphlet?
    • You can use the template below

 

Trifold Brochure Template. pptx

 

Submit your completed assignment by following the directions linked below. Please check the Course Calendar for specific due dates.

 

Save your assignment as a Microsoft Word document. (Mac users, please remember to append the “.docx” extension to the filename.) The name of the file should be your first initial and last name, followed by an underscore and the name of the assignment, and an underscore and the date. An example is shown below:

 

Jstudent_exampleproblem_101504

 

 

 

 

Module 05 Content

MDIII  DUE 7TH OF MAY

Top of Form

Ccompetency

Compare strategies for safe, effective multidimensional nursing practice when providing care for clients with lower respiratory disorders.

Scenario

You are a nurse on a pulmonary rehabilitation team at an outpatient clinic in your community. You are updating educational resources to educate clients who want to know more about health promotion and maintenance and improving pulmonary health related to their lung conditions. 

Instructions

Create an infographic for a lower respiratory system disorder that includes the following components:

    • Risk factors associated with the common lower respiratory system disorder.
    • Description of three priority treatments for the lower respiratory disorder.
    • Description of inter professional collaborative care team members and their roles to improve health outcomes for the lower respiratory system disorder.
    • Description of three multidimensional nursing care strategies that support health promotion and maintenance for clients with the lower respiratory system disorder.
    • Description of a national organization as a support resource for your client specific to the lower respiratory system disorder.
    • Drop in a grammarly report with no more than 10% plagiarism.

 

Resources

For assistance creating an infographic, review this FAQ.

 

Submit your completed assignment by following the directions linked below. Please check the Course Calendar for specific due dates.

 

Save your assignment as a Microsoft Word document. (Mac users, please remember to append the “.docx” extension to the filename.) The name of the file should be your first initial and last name, followed by an underscore and the name of the assignment, and an underscore and the date. An example is shown below:

 

Jstudent_exampleproblem_101504

Bottom of Form

 

 

Bottom of Form

 

Triple Aim Outcome Measures

/in /by

Triple Aim Outcome Measures

Assessment 1 Instructions: Triple Aim Outcome Measures

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

  • PRINT
  • Develop a presentation, containing 10-15 slides, on the Institute for Healthcare Improvement’s Triple Aim, how current and emerging health care models support the Triple Aim, and how governmental regulatory initiatives and outcome measures can be applied in the care coordination process to achieve the Triple Aim in a population.

    ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

Introduction

The Triple Aim is a framework by the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (n.d.) for “simultaneously improving the health of the population, enhancing the experience and outcomes of the patient, and reducing per capita cost of care for the benefit of communities.” Care coordinators must have a model and framework to guide their practice and enable them to achieve the Triple Aim. Presently, many rural hospitals are using archaic models that must be updated to achieve the Triple Aim. For example, the patient-centered medical home model has been around for 30 years, but it has evolved during that time.

This assessment provides an opportunity for you to develop an evidence-based presentation of the ways in which an organization’s care coordination process can be modified to achieve the Triple Aim.

Models of Care

National initiatives focus on health care organizations to continuously improve the quality, safety, and coordination of care. In response to these initiatives, health care models have surfaced with the goal to guide national health safety and quality improvement efforts.

Nursing is an art and science with a foundation that embraces evidence, research, and quality. The thought “we have always done it this way” has long been discarded and replaced by standards based on evidence-based research. As the specialization of care coordination has evolved, care coordination has proven to be a vital element that links patients and families to safer and higher quality care. One care coordination model, the patient-centered medical home (PCMH), has gained momentum and support from governmental and regulatory agencies.

Reference

Institute for Healthcare Improvement. (n.d.). Triple Aim for populations. http://www.ihi.org/Topics/TripleAim/Pages/default.aspx

Preparation

In this assessment, you will assume the role of a new case manager at a small rural hospital, Sacred Heart. You have been asked to deliver an evidence-based presentation to hospital leaders and clinical leadership teams about the ways in which the care coordination process at Sacred Heart can be modified to achieve the Triple Aim within the hospital’s rural population.

To gain a better understanding of current health care models and their support for the Triple Aim, examine and compare such models as:

    • Patient-centered medical home (PCMH).
    • Transitional care.
    • Patient self-management.
    • Guided care.
    • Care coordination (Institute for Healthcare Improvement).

Then, finish gathering the information needed to prepare for your presentation by completing the following simulation exercise:

    • Vila Health: Triple Aim Outcomes.

Note: Remember that you can submit all or a portion of your presentation to Smarthinking for feedback before you submit the final version of this assessment. If you plan on using this free service, be mindful of the turnaround time of 24–48 hours for receiving feedback.

Presentation Software

You may use Microsoft PowerPoint or any other suitable presentation software to create your slides. If you elect to use an application other than PowerPoint, check with faculty to avoid potential file compatibility issues.

You are encouraged to review the various presentation resources provided for this assessment. These resources will help you to design an effective presentation, whether you choose to use PowerPoint or other presentation design software.

Instructions

Develop a presentation of specific suggestions for improving the care coordination process at Sacred Heart Hospital to achieve Triple Aim outcomes.

Developing the Presentation

The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Be sure that your presentation addresses each point, at a minimum. You may also want to read the Triple Aim Outcome Measures Scoring Guide to better understand how each criterion will be assessed.

    • Explain how the Triple Aim contributes to population health, improves the patient care experience, and reduces health care costs on a regional, state, and national level. You will do this on slides with these specific headings:
      • Experience of Care/Patient Satisfaction.
      • Improving Population or Community Health.
      • Decreasing Per Capita Costs.
    • Analyze the relationships between various current and emerging health care models you have chosen to examine and the ways in which they support the Triple Aim by answering these guiding questions:
      • How do I define the rationale and philosophy of these health care models?
      • Can I explain how these health care models have evolved? How do I believe that these health care models have changed over time?
      • Can I cite at least three ways in which health care quality is enhanced through these models? In which three ways do I believe that these models most enhance health care quality? (Cite references to support your assertion.)
    • Explain how the structure of these models contribute to the process of gathering and evaluating the quality of evidence-based data.
    • Explain how evidence-based data shapes the care coordination process in nursing.
    • Describe three governmental regulatory initiatives and outcome measures that can be applied in the care coordination process to achieve the Triple Aim within a population.
    • Present process improvement recommendations to a stakeholder group clearly and concisely.
      • Address the anticipated needs and concerns of your audience.
      • What questions or objections are they likely to raise? How will you respond?
    • Support your main points, arguments, and conclusions with relevant and credible evidence, correctly formatting citations and references using current APA style.
      • Is your supporting evidence clear and explicit?
      • How or why does particular evidence support a claim?
      • Will your audience see the connection?

Additional Requirements

PRESENTATION FORMAT AND LENGTH

Your slide deck should consist of 10–15 slides that address the presentation criteria, not including the title slide, purpose slide, and references slide.

    • Begin your presentation with the following slides:
      • Title.
      • Purpose (the reasons for the presentation).
      • Definition of the Triple Aim outcome measures.
    • Use the speaker’s notes section of each slide to develop your talking points and cite your sources, as appropriate.

SUPPORTING EVIDENCE

    • Cite 3–5 sources of credible scholarly or professional evidence to support your presentation.
    • List your sources on the references slide at the end of your presentation.
    • Apply APA formatting to all in-text citations and references.

 

Interview and Interdisciplinary Issue Identification

/in /by

Interview and Interdisciplinary Issue Identification

Assessment 2 Instructions: Interview and Interdisciplinary Issue Identification

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

  • PRINT
  • For this assessment, you will create a 3 page report on an interview you have conducted with a health care professional. You will identify an issue from the interview that could be improved with an interdisciplinary approach, and review best practices and evidence to address the issue.

    ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

As a baccalaureate-prepared nurse, your participation and leadership in interdisciplinary teams will be vital to the health outcomes for your patients and organization. One way to approach designing an improvement project is to use the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle. The Institute for Healthcare Improvement describes it thus:

The Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle is shorthand for testing a change in the real work setting—by planning it, trying it, observing the results, and acting on what is learned. This is the scientific method adapted for action-oriented learning…Essentially, the PDSA cycle helps you test out change ideas on a smaller scale before evaluating the results and making adjustments before potentially launching into a somewhat larger scale project (n.d.).

You might also recognize that the PDSA cycle resembles the nursing process. The benefit of gaining experience with this model of project design is that it provides nurses with an opportunity to ideate and lead improvements. For this assessment, you will not be implementing all of the PDSA cycle. Instead, you are being asked to interview a health care professional of your choice to determine what kind of interdisciplinary problem he or she is experiencing or has experienced in the workplace. This interview, in Assessment 2, will inform the research that you will conduct to propose a plan for interdisciplinary collaboration in Assessment 3.

It would be an excellent choice to complete the PDSA Cycle activity prior to developing the report. The activity consists of four questions that create the opportunity to check your understanding of best practices related to each stage of the PDSA cycle. The information gained from completing this formative will promote your success with the Interview and Interdisciplinary Issue Identification report. This will take just a few minutes of your time and is not graded.

Reference

Institute for Healthcare Improvement. (n.d.). How to improve. http://www.ihi.org/resources/Pages/HowtoImprove/default.aspx

Demonstration of Proficiency

    • Competency 2: Explain how interdisciplinary collaboration can be used to achieve desired patient and systems outcomes.
      • Summarize an interview focused on past or current issues at a health care organization.
      • Describe collaboration approaches from the literature that could be relevant in establishing or improving an interdisciplinary team to address an organizational issue.
    • Competency 3: Describe ways to incorporate evidence-based practice within an interdisciplinary team.
      • Identify an issue from an interview for which an evidence-based interdisciplinary approach would be appropriate.
    • Competency 4: Explain how change management theories and leadership strategies can enable interdisciplinary teams to achieve specific organizational goals.
      • Describe change theories and a leadership strategy that could help develop an interdisciplinary solution to an organizational issue.
    • Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based communication strategies to impact patient, interdisciplinary team, and systems outcomes.
      • Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.
      • Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.

Professional Context

This assessment will introduce the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) Model to create change in an organization. By interviewing a colleague of your choice, you will begin gathering information about an interprofessional collaboration problem that your colleague is experiencing or has experienced. You will identify a change theory and leadership strategies to help solve this problem.

Scenario

This assessment is the first of three related assessments in which you will gather interview information (Assessment 2); design a proposal for interdisciplinary problem-solving, (Assessment 3); and report on how an interdisciplinary improvement plan could be implemented in a place of practice (Assessment 4). At the end of the course, your interviewee will have a proposal plan based on the PDSA cycle that he or she could present to stakeholders to address an interdisciplinary problem in the workplace.

For this assessment, you will need to interview a health care professional such as a fellow learner, nursing colleague, administrator, business partner, or another appropriate person who could provide you with sufficient information regarding an organizational problem that he or she is experiencing or has experienced, or an area where they are seeking improvements. Consult the Interview Guide [DOCX] for an outline of how to prepare and the types of information you will need to complete this project successfully.

Remember: this is just the first in a series of three assessments.

Instructions

For this assessment, you will report on the information that you collected in your interview, analyzing the interview data and identifying a past or current issue that would benefit from an interdisciplinary approach. This could be an issue that has not been addressed by an interdisciplinary approach or one that could benefit from improvements related to the interdisciplinary approach currently being used. You will discuss the interview strategy that you used to collect information. Your interview strategy should be supported by citations from the literature. Additionally, you will start laying the foundation for your Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal (Assessment 3) by researching potential change theories, leadership strategies, and collaboration approaches that could be relevant to issue you have identified. Please be certain to review the scoring guide to confirm specific required elements of this assessment. Note that there are differences between basic, proficient and distinguished scores.

When submitting your plan, use the Interview and Issue Identification Template [DOCX], which will help you to stay organized and concise. As you complete the template, make sure you use APA format for in-text citations for the evidence and best practices that are informing your plan, as well as for the reference list at the end.

Additionally, be sure to address the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please study the scoring guide carefully so you understand what is needed for a distinguished score.

    • Summarize an interview focused on past or current issues at a health care organization.
    • Identify an issue from an interview for which an evidence-based interdisciplinary approach would be appropriate.
    • Describe potential change theories and leadership strategies that could inform an interdisciplinary solution to an organizational issue.
    • Describe collaboration approaches from the literature that could facilitate establishing or improving an interdisciplinary team to address an organizational issue.
    • Communicate with writing that is clear, logically organized, and professional, with correct grammar and spelling, and using current APA style.

Additional Requirements

    • Length of submission: Use the provided template. Most submissions will be 3 pages in length. Be sure to include a reference page at the end of the plan.
    • Number of references: Cite a minimum of 3 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your central ideas. Resources should be no more than 5 years old.
    • APA formatting: Make sure that in-text citations and reference list follow current APA style.

Portfolio Prompt: Remember to save the final assessment to your ePortfolio so that you may refer to it as you complete the final Capstone course.

  • SCORING GUIDE

Use the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated.

VIEW SCORING GUIDE

 

Nursing homework help

/in /by

Nursing homework help

Thank you for submitting the assignment to the SafeAssign link! You received a high similarity score (75%). This may be due to not citing or using a reference correctly. Remember that direct quotes should be avoided as they will raise the score. Always paraphrase when possible.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

I suggest that you submit your assignments to SafeAssign as a draft to determine whether you work matches existing sources published elsewhere. You will be provided an opportunity to review these matches and correct them so to lower your similarity results and avoid plagiarism concerns. A good rule of thumb is to review the highlighted areas and ask yourself if you cited correctly. If most of your sentence is highlighted, ask yourself if you need to use direct quotes, or paraphrase it. Once you determine that you are ok, submit the draft to the final submission link for grading. You may submit your assignment to the draft area as many times as you wish, but only once to the final link.

If you have submitted a paper that you used in a previous course, your similarity report may be high, please contact the me. According to Capella’s policy, you may reuse your own previous work; however, please make sure that your assignment matches the grading assignment rubric. Often, recycled assignments do not match.

According to policy, I am to assign a “non-performance” for all criteria in the scoring guide and request that you address the issue before submitting your next assignment. In addition, here is a Capella resource that may be helpful: https://campus.capella.edu/web/writing-center/sources-and-evidence/quoting  

Please let me know if you can see the SafeAssign results. While unintentional, continued high similarity matches may result in an Academic Honesty form submission to the school. Please see this as a learning opportunity for future assignments! I wish for your continued success and would like to discuss these results with you. 

Thanks so much!  I

 

Dr. Michael L. Jones

DOWNLOAD YOUR EVALUATED ASSESSMENT FILE

COMPETENCY 1

Explain how interdisciplinary collaboration can be used to achieve desired patient and systems outcomes.

CRITERION

Summarize an interview focused on past or current issues at a health care organization.

Your result: Non-Performance

Distinguished

Summarizes an interview focused on past or current issues at a health care organization. Notes strategies employed in the interview to ensure that sufficient information was gathered.

Proficient

Summarizes an interview focused on past or current issues at a health care organization.

Basic

Discusses an interview, but the focus of the interview, the issues addressed, or the specifics of health care organizational context are unclear or missing.

Non-Performance

Does not summarize an interview focused on past or current issues at a health care organization.

Faculty Comments:

Please see overall comments.

CRITERION

Describe collaborative approaches from the literature that could be relevant in establishing or improving an interdisciplinary team to address an organizational issue.

Your result: Non-Performance

Distinguished

Describes collaborative approaches from the literature that could be relevant in establishing or improving an interdisciplinary team to address an organizational issue. Notes which sources seem most credible or relevant to the specific organizational issue.

Proficient

Describes collaborative approaches from the literature that could be relevant in establishing or improving an interdisciplinary team to address an organizational issue.

Basic

Identifies collaborative approaches from the literature but the relevance to establishing or improving an interdisciplinary team to address an organizational issue is unclear or insufficiently explained.

Non-Performance

Does not describe collaborative approaches from the literature that could be relevant in establishing or improving an interdisciplinary team to address an organizational issue.

Faculty Comments:

Please see overall comments.

COMPETENCY 2

Describe ways to incorporate evidence-based practice within an interdisciplinary team.

CRITERION

Identify an issue from an interview for which an evidence-based interdisciplinary approach would be appropriate.

Your result: Non-Performance

Distinguished

Identifies an issue from an interview for which an evidence-based interdisciplinary approach would be appropriate, providing one or more specific reasons to justify this approach.

Proficient

Identifies an issue from an interview for which an evidence-based interdisciplinary approach would be appropriate.

Basic

Identifies an issue with an unclear connection to the interview or for which an evidence-based interdisciplinary approach seems inappropriate.

Non-Performance

Does not identify an issue from an interview for which an evidence-based interdisciplinary approach would be appropriate.

Faculty Comments:

Please see overall comments.

COMPETENCY 3

Explain how change management theories and leadership strategies can enable interdisciplinary teams to achieve specific organizational goals.

CRITERION

Describe potential change theories and leadership strategies that could help develop an interdisciplinary solution to an organizational issue.

Your result: Non-Performance

Distinguished

Describes potential change theories and leadership strategies that could help develop an interdisciplinary solution to an organizational issue. Notes which sources seem most credible or relevant to the specific organizational issue.

Proficient

Describes potential change theories and leadership strategies that could help develop an interdisciplinary solution to an organizational issue.

Basic

Identifies change theories and leadership strategies that are unclear, incomplete, or irrelevant to developing an interdisciplinary solution to an organizational issue.

Non-Performance

Does not describe potential change theories and leadership strategies that could help develop an interdisciplinary solution to an organizational issue.

Faculty Comments:

Please see overall comments.

COMPETENCY 4

Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based communication strategies to impact patient, interdisciplinary team, and systems outcomes.

CRITERION

Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.

Your result: Non-Performance

Distinguished

Organizes content with a clear purpose. Content flows logically with smooth transitions using coherent paragraphs, correct grammar/punctuation, word choice, and free of spelling errors.

Proficient

Organizes content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.

Basic

Organizes content with some logical flow and smooth transitions. Contains errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.

Non-Performance

Does not organize content for ideas. Lacks logical flow and smooth transitions.

Faculty Comments:

Please see overall comments.

CRITERION

Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.

Your result: Non-Performance

Distinguished

Exhibits strict and flawless adherence to APA formatting of headings, in-text citations, and references. Quotes and paraphrases correctly.

Proficient

Applies APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.

Basic

Applies APA formatting to in-text citations, headings and references incorrectly and/or inconsistently, detracting noticeable from the content. Inconsistently uses headings, quotes and/or paraphrasing.

Non-Performance

Does not apply APA formatting to headings, in-text citations, and references. Does not use quotes or paraphrase correctly.

 

EDHS 4111 Epidemiological Principles Health Promotion Spring 2022

/in /by

EDHS 4111 Epidemiological Principles Health Promotion Spring 2022

Format of the Term Paper

EDHS 4111 Epidemiological Principles Health Promotion

Spring 2022

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

The assignment must be typed in 12-point font, double-spaced with one-inch margins.  A title page should be included with a topic title, your name and institution (University of New Orleans).  Although APA style typically includes a running head, that feature is not required for this assignment.

 

This will be an analytical paper presenting your analysis of research published in the academic press or on reliable and verifiable websites.

 

Read and analyze your sources closely. Do your sources agree with each other? Do they disagree? What do you think of the arguments, counterarguments? Your informed opinion is important.

 

Pick a topic

  • You choose a topic of interest to you that addresses your academic or professional interests related to epidemiology.

 

Consider the timeframe

  • Historic (e.g., 1918 influenza pandemic, polio outbreak of 1955, SARS global outbreak of 2003) or current concerns

 

Supporting references

  • References used must be from reliable and verifiable sources (e.g., CDC, WHO) or from the academic literature. Although social media reports, popular press, and even the mainstream media may be sources of topics, they cannot be used to support your arguments.

 

The paper should be divided into the following sections. Each section will be scored according to the points listed below.

 

Title

  • Your title should be concise but informative enough for the reader to understand the topic of the paper.

 

Introduction (20 points)

 

  • In this section, describe your research question (topic). Include a justification for investigating this question/problem (in essence, why do you believe that this topic  is an important question to investigate).
  • Describe the process of searching for your references. Explain the specific criteria you used to select your chosen resources.

 

Main Body (40 points)

 

  • For each claim you make in your paper, please use at least three reliable and verifiable sources.

 

Summary (20 points)

 

  • Summarize the main findings of your research. Write a synthesis of what you have learned about your topic.
  • Was your question answered? What do we need to learn? Is there something from these findings that might shape your professional practice?

 

References (10 points)

 

  • References are in a separate section. Follow APA format for listing all references cited in your paper.

 

APA Format (10 points)

 

  • The final 10 points are awarded based on the correct use of APA format with in-text citations and in the reference list.

 

 

 

 

 

The Affordable Care Act and Beyond

/in /by

The Affordable Care Act and Beyond

Assessment 1 Instructions: The Affordable Care Act and Beyond

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

  • PRINT
  • Complete a 3 page assessment template analyzing the impacts of The Affordable Care Act on the health care ecosystem we inhabit today and the related significance of one other health care initiative enacted since 2010.

    ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA or ACA) was signed into law by President Barack Obama in 2010. The ACA attempts to increase access to care, reduce cost, and improve quality. Nearly 50 different reform initiatives will be implemented between 2010 and 2017. Although primary care is a major focus of the act, these additional initiatives are focused on 10 different areas, including public health, prevention of disease, community health, and increasing revenue provisions to pay for the reform (Niles, 2021). The law has been controversial due to the mandate that all people in the United States must purchase health insurance. The future is still uncertain for the ACA.

The U.S. government plays a significant role in the operation of the country’s health care system. Quality, access, funding, education, and preventative services are all influenced by the U.S. government (Niles, 2021), and the Affordable Care Act (ACA) has further increased the role and involvement of the government in health care. All health care administrators must be knowledgeable on the role of the government. Numerous governmental organizations exist, such as the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), and the Office of the Surgeon General to name a few. Each organization exists for a specific purpose and has a specific mission. Your role as an administrator will be to understand the scope of these agencies and to help your organization meet or exceed the governmental mandates imposed by each.

As leaders in our field, it is our responsibility to stay on top of current issues and laws and to be visionaries for our organizations. Subscribing to email bulletins and alerts from the various governmental agencies is one way to stay abreast of changing regulations. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, HHS.gov, and Healthcare.gov are excellent resources that all administrators should check on a regular basis. The government, technology, and the changing financial landscape will all continue to impact and change the health care industry (Niles, 2021), and as health care administrators, we must be prepared to quickly respond.

Reference

Niles, N. J. (2021). Basics of the U.S. health care system (4th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning. 

The U.S. health care system was impacted significantly in 2010 by the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Although the ACA improved access to health care, it emphasized the need for policies that increase funding and to streamline enrollment. Since the implementation of the ACA, newer reform policies and initiatives such as the Hospital Quality Initiative (2012), the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA) (2015), the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS), and the American Rescue Plan Act (2021) have increased quality initiatives through regulatory laws. In this assessment, you will review the Affordable Care Act and other more recent initiatives to understand the significance of quality evolution.

Reference

Niles, N. J. (2021). Basics of the U.S. health care system (4th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.

Instructions

Using the Assessment 1 Template [DOCX], analyze the impacts of the ACA on the health care ecosystem we inhabit today. As part of this analysis, discuss the related significance of one other health care initiative enacted since 2010. Select this initiative from a list of the following four historical health care quality milestones:

    • The Hospital Quality Initiative (2012).
    • The Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA) (2015).
    • The Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) (2015).
      • Although MIPS is a component of MACRA, you may choose to focus on it separately.
    • The American Rescue Plan Act (2021).

In your assessment template, include the following:

    • Title page.
    • Introduction.
      • Preview the main themes of your paper.
    • Annotated bibliography.
      • Demonstrate research ability by identifying three quality sources supporting the ACA.
      • Demonstrate research ability by identifying three quality sources supporting your chosen focused topic in health care legislation, a regulatory agency, or a quality initiative.
      • Summarize each of the six articles separately to show comprehension of both topics.
      • Include APA citations for each source.
    • Draft a summary (1) addressing how the ACA and the other topic selected have impacted today’s health care ecosystem.
    • Conclusion.
    • References.

Note: Your sources for this assessment must be evidence-based research, peer-reviewed journal articles, or reliable primary sources from government or professional organization publications.

Additional Requirements

    • Length: Your paper must be a minimum of 3 double-spaced pages, not including the title page and References section.
    • Font: Times New Roman, 12 point.
    • References: Cite and summarize at least six peer-reviewed scholarly journal articles or reliable primary sources from government or professional organization publications.
    • Style: Format your paper according to APA style. Refer to Evidence and APA for guidance.

Note: Please review the The Affordable Care Act and Beyond Scoring Guide before you begin the assessment.

Competencies Measured

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment scoring guide criteria:

    • Competency 1: Analyze current health reform, policy, and regulation in U.S. health care.
      • Analyze peer-reviewed literature that discusses how the Affordable Care Act has impacted the quality of and access to care.
      • Analyze peer-reviewed literature that discusses how initiatives since the Affordable Care Act have impacted the quality of and access to care.
      • Evaluate ways in which quality has improved or not improved since 2010.
    • Competency 4: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and respectful of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others.
      • Write with minimal grammar, usage, spelling, and mechanical errors.
      • Apply proper APA formatting and citation style as required.
  • SCORING GUIDE

Use the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated.

VIEW SCORING GUIDE

 

Rubric Content And Mechanics

/in /by

Rubric Content And Mechanics

  • Rubric Content And Mechanics

50% of total grade

Mastery: Advanced or exceeds achievement

Contains thorough details by age group to represent the topic identified. Information is current.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

30

Proficiency: Clear/effective achievement

Contains sufficient details by age group to represent the topic identified. Information is current.

27.9

Competence: Adequate/basic achievement

Contains some details by age group to represent the topic identified. Information is mostly current.

25.2

Emerging: Limited or growing achievement

Details are minimal or non-existent.

 

·         Client Data

40% of total grade

Mastery: Advanced or exceeds achievement

Observation data is documented with extensive details.

24

Proficiency: Clear/effective achievement

Observation data is documented with sufficient details.

22.32

Competence: Adequate/basic achievement

Observation data is documented with some details.

20.16

Emerging: Limited or growing achievement

Observation data is incomplete.

15.6

 

·         Spelling and Grammar

5% of total grade

Mastery: Advanced or exceeds achievement

Demonstrates an exemplary application of spelling and grammar.

3

Proficiency: Clear/effective achievement

Displays proper grammar application and writing contains minimal to no spelling errors. May contain rare improper uses of words (ex., their vs. there), a misplaced modifier, or a run-on sentence, but does not detract from the overall understanding of the sentence and/or paragraph.

2.79

Competence: Adequate/basic achievement

Spelling and grammar errors occur but are inconsistent. Paragraphs and sentences are coherent but may exhibit spelling errors, run-on’s or fragments, and/or improper verb tense usage.

2.52

Emerging: Limited or growing achievement

Spelling and grammar contain substantial errors that makes sentences and/or paragraphs incoherent.

1.95

 

 

APA Style

5% of total grade

Mastery: Advanced or exceeds achievement

APA citations are free of style and formatting errors.

3

Proficiency: Clear/effective achievement

Errors in APA citations are less noticeable and do not detract from the ability to locate the original source (for example, a missing or misused comma or period, missing parentheses, author name not properly abbreviated, indentation is misaligned).

2.79

Competence: Adequate/basic achievement

Errors in APA citations are noticeable and may detract from the ability to locate the original source (for example, no title provided, year of publication is missing, no punctuation).

2.52

Emerging: Limited or growing achievement

Citations do not follow APA Style. Quotations, paraphrases, and summaries are not cited, or there is no attempt to cite them using APA style.

1.95

 

Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal

/in /by

Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal

Assessment 3 Instructions: Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

  • PRINT
  • For this assessment you will create a 3 page plan proposal for an interprofessional team to collaborate and work toward driving improvements in the organizational issue you identified in the second assessment.

    ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

The health care industry is always striving to improve patient outcomes and attain organizational goals. Nurses can play a critical role in achieving these goals; one way to encourage nurse participation in larger organizational efforts is to create a shared vision and team goals (Mulvale et al., 2016). Participation in interdisciplinary teams can also offer nurses opportunities to share their expertise and leadership skills, fostering a sense of ownership and collegiality. Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal

You are encouraged to complete the Budgeting for Nurses activity before you develop the plan proposal. The activity consists of seven questions that will allow you the opportunity to check your knowledge of budgeting basics and as well as the value of financial resource management. The information gained from completing this formative will promote success with the Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal. Completing this activity also demonstrates your engagement in the course, requires just a few minutes of your time, and is not graded.

Demonstration of Proficiency

    • Competency 1: Explain strategies for managing human and financial resources to promote organizational health.
      • Explain organizational resources, including a financial budget, needed for the plan to be a success and the impacts on those resources if nothing is done, related to the improvements sought by the plan.
    • Competency 2: Explain how interdisciplinary collaboration can be used to achieve desired patient and systems outcomes.
      • Describe an objective and predictions for an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to achieve a specific objective related to improving patient or organizational outcomes.
      • Explain the collaboration needed by an interdisciplinary team to improve the likelihood of achieving the plan’s objective. Include best practices of interdisciplinary collaboration from the literature.
    • Competency 4: Explain how change management theories and leadership strategies can enable interdisciplinary teams to achieve specific organizational goals.
      • Explain a change theory and a leadership strategy, supported by relevant evidence, that are most likely to help an interdisciplinary team succeed in collaborating and implementing, or creating buy-in for, the project plan.
    • Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based communication strategies to impact patient, interdisciplinary team, and systems outcomes.
      • Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.
      • Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.

Reference

Mulvale, G., Embrett, M., & Shaghayegh, D. R. (2016). ‘Gearing up’ to improve interprofessional collaboration in primary care: A systematic review and conceptual framework. BMC Family Practice, 17.

Professional Context

This assessment will allow you to describe a plan proposal that includes an analysis of best practices of interprofessional collaboration, change theory, leadership strategies, and organizational resources with a financial budget that can be used to solve the problem identified through the interview you conducted in the prior assessment.

Scenario

Having reviewed the information gleaned from your professional interview and identified the issue, you will determine and present an objective for an interdisciplinary intervention to address the issue.

Note: You will not be expected to implement the plan during this course. However, the plan should be evidence-based and realistic within the context of the issue and your interviewee’s organization.

Instructions

For this assessment, use the context of the organization where you conducted your interview to develop a viable plan for an interdisciplinary team to address the issue you identified. Define a specific patient or organizational outcome or objective based on the information gathered in your interview.

The goal of this assessment is to clearly lay out the improvement objective for your planned interdisciplinary intervention of the issue you identified. Additionally, be sure to further build on the leadership, change, and collaboration research you completed in the previous assessment. Look for specific, real-world ways in which those strategies and best practices could be applied to encourage buy-in for the plan or facilitate the implementation of the plan for the best possible outcome.

Using the Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal Template [DOCX] will help you stay organized and concise. As you complete each section of the template, make sure you apply APA format to in-text citations for the evidence and best practices that inform your plan, as well as the reference list at the end.

Additionally, be sure that your plan addresses the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please study the scoring guide carefully so you understand what is needed for a distinguished score.

    • Describe an objective and predictions for an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to achieve a specific goal related to improving patient or organizational outcomes.
    • Explain a change theory and a leadership strategy, supported by relevant evidence, that is most likely to help an interdisciplinary team succeed in collaborating and implementing, or creating buy-in for, the project plan.
    • Explain the collaboration needed by an interdisciplinary team to improve the likelihood of achieving the plan’s objective. Include best practices of interdisciplinary collaboration from the literature.
    • Explain organizational resources, including a financial budget, needed for the plan to succeed and the impacts on those resources if the improvements described in the plan are not made.
    • Communicate the interdisciplinary plan, with writing that is clear, logically organized, and professional, with correct grammar and spelling, using current APA style.

Additional Requirements

    • Length of submission: Use the provided template. Remember that part of this assessment is to make the plan easy to understand and use, so it is critical that you are clear and concise. Most submissions will be 3 pages in length. Be sure to include a reference page at the end of the plan.
    • Number of references: Cite a minimum of 3 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your central ideas. Resources should be no more than 5 years old.
    • APA formatting: Make sure that in-text citations and reference list follow current APA style.

Note: Faculty may use the Writing Feedback Tool when grading this assessment. The Writing Feedback Tool is designed to provide you with guidance and resources to develop your writing based on five core skills. You will find writing feedback in the Scoring Guide for the assessment, once your work has been evaluated.

Portfolio Prompt: Remember to save the final assessment to your ePortfolio so that you may refer to it as you complete the final Capstone course.

  • SCORING GUIDE

Use the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated.

VIEW SCORING GUIDE

 

Nursing homework help

/in /by

Nursing homework help

Alarms are intended to alert caregivers of potential patient problems. But if alarms are not properly managed, they can compromise patient safety.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

After completing the assigned readings:

  • Respond in one strategy per level.
  • Develop one alarm management and patient safety strategies for each of the following levels of care:
    • Organizational
    • Unit
    • Individual caregiver
  • Review the rubric for more information on how your assignment will be graded.
  • Submit as an attachment to the assignment area.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rubric

NURS_498L – Knowledge Assignment Rubric

NURS_498L – Knowledge Assignment Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
4 pts

Highly Proficient

Content is clearly written, thorough, and organized effectively. The paper includes all criteria required in assignment.

 3.4 pts

Mostly Meeting Expectations

Content is mostly clear, thorough, and organized effectively. Some points are well supported. The paper includes all criteria required in assignment.

 3.04 pts

Developing

Content is somewhat clear, but may not be thorough, or organized ineffectively. Main points may not be well supported. Includes all criteria required in assignment.

 2.6 pts

Novice

Content is generally unclear, not thorough, and organized ineffectively. Main points are not well supported. The paper does not include all criteria required in assignment.

 0 pts

Underdeveloped

Content is disconnected and unorganized. The paper does not include any criteria required in assignment.
4 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClarity and Coherence
1 pts

Highly Proficient

Sentences are well constructed throughout the paper with no oversights, omissions, or inaccuracies. Writing flows smoothly from one idea to another. Transitions are seamless and link the writer’s points consistently. The assignment is written without spelling or grammatical errors.

 0.85 pts

Mostly Meeting Expectations

Sentences are structured to communicate ideas clearly with one or two oversights, omissions, or inaccuracies. Writing flows from one idea to another with one or two exceptions. Transitions between paragraphs make the writer’s points easy to follow. The paper contains one to two spelling or grammatical errors.

 0.76 pts

Developing

Sentence structure and the writing is not clear and may distract the reader, with three to five oversights, omissions, or inaccuracies. Writing flows from one idea to another with one or two exceptions. Transitions between paragraphs may not link the writer’s points. The paper contains three to four spelling or grammatical errors.

 0.65 pts

Novice

Sentence structure and writing is not clear and distracts the reader with more than five oversights, omissions, or inaccuracies. Transitions are limited and do not link the writer’s points. The paper contains five to six spelling or grammatical errors.

 0 pts

Underdeveloped

The paper contains poor sentence structure, and sentences do not make sense. The paper lacks clarity. There are no transitions, which makes ideas difficult to follow or understand. The paper contains more than six spelling or grammatical errors.
1 pts
Total Points: 5