Neoplasm/ Neoplastic Process Paper

Neoplasm/ Neoplastic Process Paper

Neoplasm/ Neoplastic Process Paper

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

 

Introduction

“Cancer is the second leading cause of death in the United States, exceeded only by heart disease. One in every four deaths is due to cancer” (CDC, 2016) As nurses, it is essential t be familiar with the most common types of cancer and the patient presentations.

 

Assessment Outcomes

  1. Analyzes how the physiology and pathophysiology impacts the patient presentation- explain this in detail in terms of pathophysiology.
  2. Explores how this presentation will influence your practice in providing care to the patient in a holistic manner. in a rapidly changing health care environment.
  3. Articulately describes the concepts, in the patient context.
  4. Communicates effectively using graduate writing concepts.

 

Directions: Written Paper

For the purpose of this assessment, you will develop a 7-10 page paper, exclusive of the abstract and reference pages.

 

All papers are to be written using current APA citation and reference format.

 

Audience for this analysis:  The primary audience for this presentation is that of your colleagues in the Master of Science in Nursing program.

 

 

 

 

Windshield Survey Aid

Windshield Survey Aid

Windshield Survey Aid

Use these questions to guide your community assessment.

Boundaries

To what extent can you identify the boundaries of the neighborhood: natural boundaries such as a river or different terrain; man-made, such as highway or railroad; or economic, such as difference in real estate, presence of industrial or commercial units along with residential?

Does the neighborhood have an identity or a name? Is it displayed? Are there unofficial names? Are there sub communities near the area?

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

Housing and Zoning

How old are the houses? Of what style and materials are they constructed? Are all the neighborhood houses similar? If not, how would you characterize the differences?

Are there signs of disrepair, such as broken windows, steps, doors? Are any of the houses vacant?

Signs of Decay

Is the neighborhood improving or declining? Is it vibrant and full of life? How would you decide?

Is there trash, rubble, poor drainage, or disease vector harborage? Are there dilapidated sheds, rubble-filled vacant lots, abandoned cars, or boarded-up buildings?

Parks and Recreational Areas

Are there parks and recreational areas in the neighborhood? Is the open space public or private? Who uses it?

Commons

What are the neighborhood hangouts, such as schoolyards, bars, restaurants, parks? What groups go there? At what time?

Do common areas have a sense of territoriality, or are they open to strangers?

Stores

What supermarkets or neighborhood stores are available? How do residents travel to the store? Are there drug stores, laundry mats, and dry cleaners?

Transportation

How do people get in and out of the neighborhood? What is the condition of the streets? Is there a major highway near the neighborhood? Who does it serve? Is public transportation available and how accessible is it to your family?

Service Centers

Are there social agencies, clinics, recreation centers, and schools? Are doctors, dentists, or other health care providers accessible? Is there a hospital in the area? How accessible are these service centers to your family?

Street People (and Animals)

If you are walking during the day, who is on the streets; for example, are there women, children, teenagers, community health nurses, collection agents, salespeople? How are they dressed?

What animals do you see; for example, do you see stray animals, pets, watchdogs, or livestock?

Protective Services

Is there evidence of police and fire protection in the area? Where are they in relationship to the family’s residence?

Race

What is the ethnicity of residents? Are the residents African American, Caucasian Americans, Asian Americans, and so forth? How are the different racial groups residentially located?

Ethnicity

Are there indications of ethnic variances, such as food stores, churches, private schools, information in another language?

Religion

What churches and church-operated schools are in the neighborhood? How many are there?

Class

What is the social status of the residents? Are they upper, upper-middle, middle, working, or lower socioeconomic class? On what information do you base your judgment?

Health Status

Is there evidence of acute or chronic health conditions in the neighborhood, such as automobile accidents, alcoholism, drug addition, teenage smoking, pregnant teenagers, inappropriately dressed or unclean children?

Comparison

How does this neighborhood compare to the neighborhood in the immediate vicinity?

What are the strengths and weaknesses of this neighborhood and community?

NR00NP Foundational Concepts and Advanced Practice Roles

NR00NP Foundational Concepts and Advanced Practice Roles

(No Running head needed per 7th edition for student papers)

All pages must have a page number as on the template.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

 

Title of Paper

 

Student Name

 

Chamberlain University: Nurse Practitioner Track

NR00NP Foundational Concepts and Advanced Practice Roles

Instructor

Date (e.g. July 1, 2021)

 

 

 

 

Do not change font size. Font size stays the same throughout the APA paper

                  Double space only throughout the entire APA paper, including references

 

 

Visit the writing center for help with your paper. Can locate in course resources as well:

https://mychamberlain.sharepoint.com/sites/StudentResourceCenter/WC

 

 

 

 

 

Title of Paper  

(Centered and Bolded – should be the same as title on page 1 – title page)

Four APN Roles

(Level 1 Heading: Centered, Bold, Title Case Heading)

            Discuss in detail the four APN roles (CNP, CNS, CRNA & CNM). Use at least one scholarly source and include an intext citation for that source.  Paraphrase the content you are using from your resource and cite correctly. Include a description, the education preparedness and work environment of each role.  

CNP (Level 2 heading: Flush left, Bold, Uppercase and Lowercase Heading, no other punctuation)

Start paragraph under heading and indented. Description, educational preparedness, and work environment

CNS (Level 2 heading: Flush left, Bold, Uppercase and Lowercase Heading)

CRNA (Level 2 heading: Flush left, Bold, Uppercase and Lowercase Heading)

CNM (Level 2 heading: Flush left, Bold, Uppercase and Lowercase Heading)

Rationale for Choosing CNP Role (Level 1 Heading)

            Discuss in detail your rationale for choosing the CNP advanced practice role versus one of the other roles.  Avoid using “I” in scholarly writing. 

Plans for Clinical Practice (Level 1 Heading)

            Discuss in detail your plans for clinical practice after graduation.  Explain how your understanding of NP practice has changed after researching the four ANP roles.      

Role Transition (Level 1 Heading)

            Discuss your transition from the RN role to the NP role.  Describe two factors that may impact your transition.  Discuss two strategies you will use to support a successful transition from the RN to NP role.  Provide reference support from at least one scholarly source.  The textbook is not a scholarly source.

Conclusion (Level 1 Heading)

            Provide a conclusion, including a brief summary of what you discussed in the paper.  Do not introduce new information into your conclusion paper. A good rule of thumb is to have a sentence for each main idea/criteria you discussed in the paper.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

          References

Please make sure you to review the 7th edition APA book to cite your references here. Please note: you do not list a reference unless you cited the reference in your paper.

References are double spaced. References have a hanging indent and are in alphabetical order.

 

Resource:

https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/reference_list_basic_rules.html

 

 

INDIVIDUAL TOPIC SEARCH STRATEGY (ITSS) GUIDELINES

INDIVIDUAL TOPIC SEARCH STRATEGY (ITSS) GUIDELINES

 

 

INDIVIDUAL TOPIC SEARCH STRATEGY (ITSS) GUIDELINES

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

REQUIREMENTS

  • Each student will sign-up for a group to formulate an evidence-based practice topic of interest
  • Each group will use their chosen research question and put into PICO format.
  • Each group member will search, retrieve, and receive approval (by faculty) for 1 PRIMARY RESEARCH ARTICLE to answer the group Research Question.
  • Paper should include a Title and Reference
  • Page Length: 3-4 pages Excluding Title and Reference pages
  • The paper will include the following headings (in bold):

Clinical Question

  • Describe problem
  • Overview/Significance of problem in terms of outcomes or statistics
  • Your PICOT question
  • Purpose of your paper

      Level of Evidence

  • Type of question asked
  • Best evidence found to answer question

      Search Strategy

  • Search terms
  • Databases used: Chamberlain Database
  • Refinement decisions made
  • Identification of most relevant article

         Format

  • Correct grammar and spelling
  • Use of headings for each section
  • Use of APA format (7th edition)

 

  • Required to write the paper based on PAPER FORMAT
  • Refers to Grading Rubric in page 3

 

 

Clinical Question

Research Question

            For adult patients with COPD, does

 

Overview of the Problem

What statistics document this is a problem? (facts and figures)

 

Significance of the Problem

What health outcomes result from this problem. Why should people be concerned about this problem?

 

 

Purpose of Paper

The purpose of this paper is to describe search strategies to find evidence in supporting our group’s PICO question.

 

PICO question: Does exercise improve mental health symptoms in patients with psychiatric disorders?

Search Strategy

Search Terms

List all terms used to search for your article (i.e. breast cancer, screening, mammography, intervention, assessment, influencing factors….etc.)

 

Library Databases

List Chamberlain library database used (i.e. EBSCO, Medline, OVID, PubMed….etc.)

Google search engine is NOT the library database

 

Availability of Articles

How many research articles were available to answer your research question?

Provide numbers of articles, NOT just saying “plenty, sufficient, many…etc.

 

Refinement Decisions

What decision(s) have changed from your original search strategies? (i.e. peer-review, within last 5 years, primary data article, full-text….etc.) 

What was your rationale for your decision to change from original search strategies?

 

Final Article

Describe the decisions you made to specifically select 1 PRIMARY RESEARCH ARTICLE as relevant for answering your Research Question

 

Level of Evidence

Addresses Topic/Relevance to PICO

Describe how article addresses the topic, purpose and key points

 

Evidence Level Pyramid

Identify and describe the level of evidence based on Evidence Level/Hierarchy Pyramid

Refers to Level of Evidence Pyramid (Lecture #2)

 

Study Type

Identify study type of article: Quantitative, Qualitative, or Mixed-Method Study

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Grading Rubric & Description for Individual Topic Search Strategy

Clinical Question (45)
Research Question

(PICO)

15 Accurately and clearly states your Research Question as formulated and stated in PICO format
Purpose of Paper 10 Describe the purpose of your ITSS paper
Overview of Problem 10 What statistics document this is a problem?
Significance of Problem 10 What health outcomes result from your problem?
Search Strategy (65)
Search Terms

 

10 List terms used to search for your articles (breast cancer, screening, mammography, intervention, factors..etc)
Library Databases

 

10 List Chamberlain library database you used (i.e. EBSCO, Medline, OVID, PubMed)

Google search engine is NOT the library database

Availability of Articles

 

5 How many research articles were available to answer your research question? Provide numbers
Refinement Decisions 10 As you did your search, what decisions did you make in refinement to get your required articles down to a reasonable number for review?
5 What was your rationale for your decision to change?
5 How many research articles were available to answer your research question after your refinement process?
Final Article

 

10 Describe decisions you made to specifically select ONE PRIMARY DATA ARTICLE as relevant for answering your Research Question
10 Submit a copy of selected article in CANVAS
                  Level of Evidence (20)
Relevance to PICO

 

Evidence Level Pyramid

 

Study Type

10 Describe how the article addresses the topic (i.e. therapy, intervention, prognosis, risk factors, assessments, or meanings….etc)
5 Identify and describe the Level of Evidence based on level of evidence pyramid (see handout)
5 Identify the study type based on the study design: Quantitative, Qualitative, Descriptive, Mixed-Method Study
                    Format (30)
Format 5 Use of required Headings and Subheading for each category
  10 APA Format (7th ed.) references, citations
  10 Correct grammar and spelling
  5 Paper length (3-4 pages)

 

Total Points:                  /160 Points

 

Interview and Interdisciplinary Issue Identification

Interview and Interdisciplinary Issue Identification

 

 

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

 

 

 

 

 

 

nterview Summary

Summarize your interview in this section. Be sure to relate concise information about:

  • the health care organization that was discussed in the interview.
  • the interviewee’s role and duties.
  • the relevant issues at the organization.
  • any relevant comments on the actions taken by the organization or leadership previously and their effectiveness.
  • the organizational culture related to collaboration.
  • any relevant collaboration or interdisciplinary team experience you interviewee has had.

The goal of this section is to convey what was discussed at the interview and identify an issue to pursue throughout the rest of this assessment (and future assessments in this course), as well as have enough information to relate theories, strategies, and approaches to the situation at the organization.

Issue Identification

Identify the issue from the interview for which you consider an evidence-based interdisciplinary approach appropriate. Provide one or more specific reasons why an interdisciplinary approach would be appropriate for the issue.

Change Theories That Could Lead to an Interdisciplinary Solution

For this section, look to the literature and describe one or more change theories that would help to develop an interdisciplinary solution to the identified issue. Also, you should briefly note the relevance and credibility of the sources that you cite.

Another way to think through this section is:

  • What is the change theory?
  • How could it help create an interdisciplinary solution?
  • How relevant is the theory to the specific identified issue?
  • How credible is the source?

Leadership Strategies That Could Lead to an Interdisciplinary Solution

This section is similar to the previous one, except you will be looking to the literature to help you describe one or more leadership strategy that would help you develop an interdisciplinary solution to the identified issue. Also, you should briefly note the relevance and credibility of the sources that you cite.

Another way to think through this section is:

  • What is the leadership strategy?
  • How could it help create an interdisciplinary solution?
  • How relevant is the strategy to the specific identified issue?
  • How credible is the source?

Collaboration Approaches for Interdisciplinary Teams

Again, this section will be similar to the previous once, except that the focus will be on collaboration approaches. Depending on whether or not your interviewee’s organization uses interdisciplinary teams frequently, your focus in this section may be on how to establish interdisciplinary teams and a collaborative foundation or how to improve the collaboration within an already established teams. You should also briefly note the relevance and credibility of the sources that you cite.

Another way to think through this section is:

  • What is the leadership approach?
  • How could it help establish or improve collaboration?
  • How relevant is the approach to the specific identified issue?
  • How credible is the source?

 

 

References

CAS 321 Advanced Study of Infant and Toddler Development Research

CAS 321 Advanced Study of Infant and Toddler Development Research

CAS 321 Advanced Study of Infant and Toddler Development Research Paper Guideline and Scoring Rubric (70 points possible)

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

The purpose of this research paper assignment is to summarize and synthesize findings from at least six scholarly resources. For this assignment, there are three steps involved: 1) write a proposal (10 points), 2) submit a Reference Page (10 points), and 3) complete your final paper (50 points). You will write a 7-page APA style research paper on a topic related to child development from conception through age three, worth a maximum of 50 points. A minimum of six scholarly references (4 peerreview journal articles) is required for your resources. Course lecture notes may not be cited. You may not use popular sources such as Wikipedia and your book are not to be the sole source of your information. The sources of all information should be documented using APA style citations (7th edition).

 

The lengths of the research paper will be seven pages (doubled-spaced). Your paper should include three major sections: The Title Page, Main Body (5 pages), and References (one page). No Direct Quotes are allowed for your paper. See below for the scoring rubric. The project must be submitted in Microsoft Word format.

 

You need to submit your paper to Turnitin.com via course website. All papers must have an originality score of 25% or less (meaning that 75% or more of the content is original to the author). This score includes references and quotes. You must review your originality report after submitting your paper to ensure that your score is appropriate. I recommend submitting a draft in advance to confirm that your score will be acceptable.

 

If your score is too high, you will need to revise and resubmit the paper. Please contact me immediately if your paper has a score above 25%. Papers with a score above 25% will not be graded (will receive a zero) unless they are revised and resubmitted.

 

Scoring Rubric (50 points possible)

Content (40 points)

Introductory paragraph (5 points)

Introduce general idea

Explains why this topic is important

Define the age range that you will focus on

Explains what the paper will cover

Specific developmental characteristics/trends related to topic

and age/life phase are discussed (7 points)

Content is accurate, comprehensive, relevant to developmental

phase overall (7 points)

Major points are stated clearly, supported by specific details,

examples, and analysis (7 points)

Integration and synthesizing of research findings, background reading is

appropriate, supports rationale (information from at least 6 high

quality sources is included) (7 points)

Recommendations/implications for developmentally appropriate

practice are logical, follow from discussion (7 points)

 

Organization (10 points)

        Meets minimum page requirement (1 point)                                                                                                          Clarity of expression (1 point)

Grammar (3 points)

Conciseness (2 points)

APA-style (3 points)

NR326 Mental Health Nursing

NR326 Mental Health Nursing

Purpose

The student will review, summarize, and critique a scholarly article related to a mental health topic.

Course outcomes: This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes.

(CO 4) Utilize critical thinking skills in clinical decision-making and implementation of the nursing process for psychiatric/mental health clients. (PO 4)

(CO 5) Utilize available resources to meet self-identified goals for personal, professional, and educational development appropriate to the mental health setting. (PO 5)

(CO 7) Examine moral, ethical, legal, and professional standards and principles as a basis for clinical decision-making. (PO 6)

(CO 9) Utilize research findings as a basis for the development of a group leadership experience. (PO 8)

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

Due date: Your faculty member will inform you when this assignment is due. The Late Assignment Policy applies to this assignment.

Total points possible: 100 points

Preparing the assignment

  • Follow these guidelines when completing this Speak with your faculty member if you have questions.
    1. Select a scholarly nursing or research article, published within the last five years, related to mental health The content of the article must relate to evidence-based practice.
      • You may need to evaluate several articles to find one that is
    2. Ensure that no other member of your clinical group chooses the same article, then submit your choice for faculty
    3. The submitted assignment should be 2-3 pages in length, excluding the title and reference
  • Include the following sections (detailed criteria listed below and in the Grading Rubric must match exactly).
    1. Introduction (10 points/10%)
      • Establishes purpose of the paper
      • Captures attention of the reader
    2. Article Summary (30 points/30%)
      • Statistics to support significance of the topic to mental health care
      • Key points of the article
      • Key evidence presented
      • Examples of how the evidence can be incorporated into your nursing practice
    3. Article Critique (30 points/30%)
      • Present strengths of the article
      • Present weaknesses of the article
      • Discuss if you would/would not recommend this article to a colleague
    4. Conclusion (15 points/15%)
      • Provides analysis or synthesis of information within the body of the text
      • Supported by ides presented in the body of the paper
      • Is clearly written
    5. Article Selection and Approval (5 points/5%)
      • Current (published in last 5 years)
      • Relevant to mental health care
      • Not used by another student within the clinical group
      • Submitted and approved as directed by instructor
    6. APA format and Writing Mechanics (10 points/10%)

 

 

  • Correct use of standard English grammar and sentence structure
  • No spelling or typographical errors
  • Document includes title and reference pages
  • Citations in the text and reference page

 

For writing assistance (APA, formatting, or grammar) visit the APA Citation and Writing page in the online library.

 

Please note that your instructor may provide you with additional assessments in any form to determine that you fully understand the concepts learned in the review module.

 

Grading Rubric Criteria are met when the student’s application of knowledge demonstrates achievement of the outcomes for this assignment.

 

Assignment Section and Required Criteria

(Points possible/% of total points available)

Highest Level of Performance High Level of Performance Satisfactory Level of Performance Unsatisfactory Level of Performance Section not present in paper
Introduction

(10 points/10%)

10 points 8 points 0 points
Required criteria

1.    Establishes purpose of the paper

2.    Captures attention of the reader

Includes 2 requirements for section. Includes 1 requirement for section. No requirements for this section presented.
Article Summary

(30 points/30%)

30 points 25 points 24 points 11 points 0 points
Required criteria

1.    Statistics to support significance of the topic to mental health care

2.    Key points of the article

3.    Key evidence presented

4.    Examples of how the evidence can be incorporated into your nursing practice

Includes 4 requirements for section. Includes 3 requirements for section. Includes 2 requirements for section. Includes 1 requirement for section. No requirements for this section presented.
Article Critique

(30 points/30%)

30 points 25 points 11 points 0 points
Required criteria

1.    Present strengths of the article

2.    Present weaknesses of the article

3.    Discuss if you would/would not recommend this article to a colleague

Includes 3 requirements for section. Includes 2 requirements for section. Includes 1 requirement for section. No requirements for this section presented.
Conclusion

(15 points/15%)

15 points 11 points 6 points 0 points
1.    Provides analysis or synthesis of information within the body of the text

2.    Supported by ides presented in the body of the paper

3.    Is clearly written

Includes 3 requirements for section. Includes 2 requirements for section. Includes 1 requirement for section. No requirements for this section presented.
Article Selection and Approval

(5 points/5%)

5 points 4 points 3 points 2 points 0 points
1.       Current (published in last 5 years)

2.       Relevant to mental health care

Includes 4 Includes 3 Includes 2 Includes 1 No requirements for

 

3.     Not used by another student within the clinical group

4.     Submitted and approved as directed by instructor

requirements for section. requirements for section. requirements for section. requirement for section. this section presented.
APA Format and Writing Mechanics

(10 points/10%)

10 points 8 points 7 points 4 points 0 points
1.    Correct use of standard English grammar and sentence structure

2.    No spelling or typographical errors

3.    Document includes title and reference pages

4.    Citations in the text and reference page

Includes 4 requirements for section. Includes 3 requirements for section. Includes 2 requirements for section. Includes 1 requirement for section. No requirements for this section presented.
Total Points Possible = 100 points

 

NR326 Mental Health Nursing

NR326 Mental Health Nursing

Purpose

The student will review, summarize, and critique a scholarly article related to a mental health topic.

Course outcomes: This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes.

(CO 4) Utilize critical thinking skills in clinical decision-making and implementation of the nursing process for psychiatric/mental health clients. (PO 4)

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

(CO 5) Utilize available resources to meet self-identified goals for personal, professional, and educational development appropriate to the mental health setting. (PO 5)

(CO 7) Examine moral, ethical, legal, and professional standards and principles as a basis for clinical decision-making. (PO 6)

(CO 9) Utilize research findings as a basis for the development of a group leadership experience. (PO 8)

 

Due date: Your faculty member will inform you when this assignment is due. The Late Assignment Policy applies to this assignment.

Total points possible: 100 points

Preparing the assignment

  • Follow these guidelines when completing this Speak with your faculty member if you have questions.
    1. Select a scholarly nursing or research article, published within the last five years, related to mental health The content of the article must relate to evidence-based practice.
      • You may need to evaluate several articles to find one that is
    2. Ensure that no other member of your clinical group chooses the same article, then submit your choice for faculty
    3. The submitted assignment should be 2-3 pages in length, excluding the title and reference
  • Include the following sections (detailed criteria listed below and in the Grading Rubric must match exactly).
    1. Introduction (10 points/10%)
      • Establishes purpose of the paper
      • Captures attention of the reader
    2. Article Summary (30 points/30%)
      • Statistics to support significance of the topic to mental health care
      • Key points of the article
      • Key evidence presented
      • Examples of how the evidence can be incorporated into your nursing practice
    3. Article Critique (30 points/30%)
      • Present strengths of the article
      • Present weaknesses of the article
      • Discuss if you would/would not recommend this article to a colleague
    4. Conclusion (15 points/15%)
      • Provides analysis or synthesis of information within the body of the text
      • Supported by ides presented in the body of the paper
      • Is clearly written
    5. Article Selection and Approval (5 points/5%)
      • Current (published in last 5 years)
      • Relevant to mental health care
      • Not used by another student within the clinical group
      • Submitted and approved as directed by instructor
    6. APA format and Writing Mechanics (10 points/10%)

 

 

  • Correct use of standard English grammar and sentence structure
  • No spelling or typographical errors
  • Document includes title and reference pages
  • Citations in the text and reference page

 

For writing assistance (APA, formatting, or grammar) visit the APA Citation and Writing page in the online library.

 

Please note that your instructor may provide you with additional assessments in any form to determine that you fully understand the concepts learned in the review module.

 

Grading Rubric Criteria are met when the student’s application of knowledge demonstrates achievement of the outcomes for this assignment.

 

Assignment Section and Required Criteria

(Points possible/% of total points available)

Highest Level of Performance High Level of Performance Satisfactory Level of Performance Unsatisfactory Level of Performance Section not present in paper
Introduction

(10 points/10%)

10 points 8 points 0 points
Required criteria

1.    Establishes purpose of the paper

2.    Captures attention of the reader

Includes 2 requirements for section. Includes 1 requirement for section. No requirements for this section presented.
Article Summary

(30 points/30%)

30 points 25 points 24 points 11 points 0 points
Required criteria

1.    Statistics to support significance of the topic to mental health care

2.    Key points of the article

3.    Key evidence presented

4.    Examples of how the evidence can be incorporated into your nursing practice

Includes 4 requirements for section. Includes 3 requirements for section. Includes 2 requirements for section. Includes 1 requirement for section. No requirements for this section presented.
Article Critique

(30 points/30%)

30 points 25 points 11 points 0 points
Required criteria

1.    Present strengths of the article

2.    Present weaknesses of the article

3.    Discuss if you would/would not recommend this article to a colleague

Includes 3 requirements for section. Includes 2 requirements for section. Includes 1 requirement for section. No requirements for this section presented.
Conclusion

(15 points/15%)

15 points 11 points 6 points 0 points
1.    Provides analysis or synthesis of information within the body of the text

2.    Supported by ides presented in the body of the paper

3.    Is clearly written

Includes 3 requirements for section. Includes 2 requirements for section. Includes 1 requirement for section. No requirements for this section presented.
Article Selection and Approval

(5 points/5%)

5 points 4 points 3 points 2 points 0 points
1.       Current (published in last 5 years)

2.       Relevant to mental health care

Includes 4 Includes 3 Includes 2 Includes 1 No requirements for

 

3.     Not used by another student within the clinical group

4.     Submitted and approved as directed by instructor

requirements for section. requirements for section. requirements for section. requirement for section. this section presented.
APA Format and Writing Mechanics

(10 points/10%)

10 points 8 points 7 points 4 points 0 points
1.    Correct use of standard English grammar and sentence structure

2.    No spelling or typographical errors

3.    Document includes title and reference pages

4.    Citations in the text and reference page

Includes 4 requirements for section. Includes 3 requirements for section. Includes 2 requirements for section. Includes 1 requirement for section. No requirements for this section presented.
Total Points Possible = 100 points

 

NRNP/PRAC 6635 Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation Exemplar

NRNP/PRAC 6635 Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation Exemplar

NRNP/PRAC 6635 Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation Exemplar

 (The comprehensive evaluation is typically the initial new patient evaluation. You will practice writing this type of note in this course. You will be ruling out other mental illnesses so often you will write up what symptoms are present and what symptoms are not present from illnesses to demonstrate you have indeed assessed for all illnesses which could be impacting your patient. For example, anxiety symptoms, depressive symptoms, bipolar symptoms, psychosis symptoms, substance use, etc.)

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

CC (chief complaint): A brief statement identifying why the patient is here. This statement is verbatim of the patient’s own words about why presenting for assessment. For a patient with dementia or other cognitive deficits, this statement can be obtained from a family member.

HPI: Begin this section with patient’s initials, age, race, gender, purpose of evaluation, current medication and referral reason. For example:

N.M. is a 34-year-old Asian male presents for psychiatric evaluation for anxiety. He is currently prescribed sertraline which he finds ineffective. His PCP referred him for evaluation and treatment.

Or

P.H., a 16-year-old Hispanic female, presents for psychiatric evaluation for concentration difficulty. She is not currently prescribed psychotropic medications. She is referred by her therapist for medication evaluation and treatment.

Then, this section continues with the symptom analysis for your note. Thorough documentation in this section is essential for patient care, coding, and billing analysis.

Paint a picture of what is wrong with the patient. This section contains the symptoms that is bringing the patient into your office. The symptoms onset, duration, frequency, severity, and impact. Your description here will guide your differential diagnoses. You are seeking symptoms that may align with many DSM-5 diagnoses, narrowing to what aligns with diagnostic criteria for mental health and substance use disorders.

Past Psychiatric History: This section documents the patient’s past treatments. Use the mnemonic Go Cha MP. 

General Statement: Typically, this is a statement of the patients first treatment experience. For example: The patient entered treatment at the age of 10 with counseling for depression during her parents’ divorce. OR The patient entered treatment for detox at age 26 after abusing alcohol since age 13.

Caregivers are listed if applicable.

Hospitalizations: How many hospitalizations? When and where was last hospitalization? How many detox? How many residential treatments? When and where was last detox/residential treatment? Any history of suicidal or homicidal behaviors? Any history of self-harm behaviors?

Medication trials: What are the previous psychotropic medications the patient has tried and what was their reaction? Effective, Not Effective, Adverse Reaction? Some examples: Haloperidol (dystonic reaction), risperidone (hyperprolactinemia), olanzapine (effective, insurance wouldn’t pay for it)

Psychotherapy or Previous Psychiatric Diagnosis: This section can be completed one of two ways depending on what you want to capture to support the evaluation. First, does the patient know what type? Did they find psychotherapy helpful or not? Why? Second, what are the previous diagnosis for the client noted from previous treatments and other providers. Thirdly, you could document both.

Substance Use History: This section contains any history or current use of caffeine, nicotine, illicit substance (including marijuana), and alcohol. Include the daily amount of use and last known use. Include type of use such as inhales, snorts, IV, etc. Include any histories of withdrawal complications from tremors, Delirium Tremens, or seizures.

Family Psychiatric/Substance Use History: This section contains any family history of psychiatric illness, substance use illnesses, and family suicides. You may choose to use a genogram to depict this information. Be sure to include a reader’s key to your genogram or write up in narrative form.

Social History: This section may be lengthy if completing an evaluation for psychotherapy or shorter if completing an evaluation for psychopharmacology.  However, at a minimum, please include:

Where patient was born, who raised the patient

Number of brothers/sisters (what order is the patient within siblings)

Who the patient currently lives with in a home? Are they single, married, divorced, widowed? How many children?

Educational Level

Hobbies:

Work History: currently working/profession, disabled, unemployed, retired?

Legal history: past hx, any current issues?

Trauma history: Any childhood or adult history of trauma?

Violence Hx: Concern or issues about safety (personal, home, community, sexual (current & historical)

 

 

Medical History: This section contains any illnesses, surgeries, include any hx of seizures, head injuries.

 

 

Current Medications: Include dosage, frequency, length of time used, and reason for use. Also include OTC or homeopathic products.

Allergies: Include medication, food, and environmental allergies separately. Provide a description of what the allergy is (e.g., angioedema, anaphylaxis). This will help determine a true reaction vs. intolerance.

Reproductive Hx: Menstrual history (date of LMP), Pregnant (yes or no), Nursing/lactating (yes or no), contraceptive use (method used), types of intercourse:  oral, anal, vaginal, other, any sexual concerns

ROS: Cover all body systems that may help you include or rule out a differential diagnosis.  Please note: THIS IS DIFFERENT from a physical examination!

You should list each system as follows: General: Head: EENT: etc. You should list these in bullet format and document the systems in order from head to toe.

Example of Complete ROS:

GENERAL: No weight loss, fever, chills, weakness, or fatigue.

HEENT: Eyes: No visual loss, blurred vision, double vision, or yellow sclerae. Ears, Nose, Throat: No hearing loss, sneezing, congestion, runny nose, or sore throat.

SKIN: No rash or itching.

CARDIOVASCULAR: No chest pain, chest pressure, or chest discomfort. No palpitations or edema.

RESPIRATORY: No shortness of breath, cough, or sputum.

GASTROINTESTINAL: No anorexia, nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea. No abdominal pain or blood.

GENITOURINARY: Burning on urination, urgency, hesitancy, odor, odd color

NEUROLOGICAL: No headache, dizziness, syncope, paralysis, ataxia, numbness, or tingling in the extremities. No change in bowel or bladder control.

MUSCULOSKELETAL: No muscle, back pain, joint pain, or stiffness.

HEMATOLOGIC: No anemia, bleeding, or bruising.

LYMPHATICS: No enlarged nodes. No history of splenectomy.

ENDOCRINOLOGIC: No reports of sweating, cold, or heat intolerance. No polyuria or polydipsia.

Physical exam (If applicable and if you have opportunity to perform—document if exam is completed by PCP): From head to toe, include what you see, hear, and feel when doing your physical exam. You only need to examine the systems that are pertinent to the CC, HPI, and History. Do not use “WNL” or “normal.” You must describe what you see. Always document in head-to-toe format i.e., General: Head: EENT: etc.

Diagnostic results: Include any labs, X-rays, or other diagnostics that are needed to develop the differential diagnoses (support with evidenced and guidelines).

Assessment

Mental Status Examination: For the purposes of your courses, this section must be presented in paragraph form and not use of a checklist! This section you will describe the patient’s appearance, attitude, behavior, mood and affect, speech, thought processes, thought content, perceptions (hallucinations, pseudohallucinations, illusions, etc.)., cognition, insight, judgment, and SI/HI. See an example below. You will modify to include the specifics for your patient on the above elements—DO NOT just copy the example. You may use a preceptor’s way of organizing the information if the MSE is in paragraph form.  

He is an 8-year-old African American male who looks his stated age. He is cooperative with examiner. He is neatly groomed and clean, dressed appropriately. There is no evidence of any abnormal motor activity. His speech is clear, coherent, normal in volume and tone. His thought process is goal directed and logical. There is no evidence of looseness of association or flight of ideas. His mood is euthymic, and his affect appropriate to his mood. He was smiling at times in an appropriate manner. He denies any auditory or visual hallucinations. There is no evidence of any delusional thinking.   He denies any current suicidal or homicidal ideation. Cognitively, he is alert and oriented. His recent and remote memory is intact. His concentration is good. His insight is good. 

Differential Diagnoses: You must have at least three differentials with supporting evidence. Explain what rules each differential in or out and justify your primary diagnosis selection. Include pertinent positives and pertinent negatives for the specific patient case.

Also included in this section is the reflection. Reflect on this case and discuss whether or not you agree with your preceptor’s assessment and diagnostic impression of the patient and why or why not. What did you learn from this case? What would you do differently?

Also include in your reflection a discussion related to legal/ethical considerations (demonstrating critical thinking beyond confidentiality and consent for treatment!), health promotion and disease prevention taking into consideration patient factors (such as age, ethnic group, etc.), PMH, and other risk factors (e.g., socioeconomic, cultural background, etc.).

References

You are required to include at least three evidence-based, peer-reviewed journal articles or evidenced-based guidelines which relate to this case to support your diagnostics and differentials diagnoses. Be sure to use correct APA 7th edition formatting.

 

 

NURS 419 Population-Focused Nursing – Spring 2022

NURS 419 Population-Focused Nursing – Spring 2022

 

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

NURS 419  Population-Focused Nursing  – Spring 2022

 

“Responding to Disease Across the Lifespan – A Chronic Disease Synthesis Paper” Assignment Guidelines

Point Value: 100 points

 

Purpose and Relationship to Course Objectives

The purpose of this assignment is to comprehensively study a disease or health concern across its lifespan, using the interventions model we are studying in class. As we have frequently discussed over the last several weeks, healthcare focuses primarily on responding to acute care issues, with much less emphasis focused on the prevention of the disease/health concern. Additionally, fragmented care, inadequate care coordination and discharge planning, short hospital stays and length of time spent with one’s primary care provider (PCP) have resulted in poor management outcomes and unnecessary re-admissions. This is made worse by not effectively addressing the social determinants of health and the resultant disparities experienced by the poor and vulnerable in our society.

 

Instructions & Guidelines:

  1. Choose a disease or healthcare concern. It does not have to be a priority noted in your CHNA. You are free to choose any topic. Clear the topic with this instructor. I highly recommend you choose a topic identified in HP 2020 as it will be easiest to identify the gold standard(s) of care for the topic you have chosen.
  2. Search and review all the available information regarding this disease/health concern.
  3. Prepare a paper summarizing the following topics listed below (#4)
  4. Content must include:
    1. Introduction and identification of the healthcare concern (Also, why you chose this topic.)
    2. Normal anatomy and physiology of the affected organ(s)
    3. Pathophysiology/etiology of the disease
    4. Incidence and prevalence rates (i.e. how many people have the disease)
    5. Mortality rates – include age-adjusted data if available (i.e. how many people are dying from the disease)
    6. Risk factors for the disease
    7. Gold standard(s) for managing this disease across its lifespan (LHIs, or other goals – ex: A1c <7); HP2020 (or other credible sources)
    8. Primary Interventions (Health Promotion/Disease Prevention)
  1. Health Promotion
  2. Disease prevention (as applicable)
  • Create a sample health education program – be specific – provide a content outline with goals, objectives and measurable outcomes (use template provided)
    1. Secondary Interventions (Early diagnosis and prompt treatment to limit disability of the disease)
  1. Risk Assessment & Screening (discuss known risk factors and who should be screened and when as a result), risk assessment, screening and invasive testing. Note: be specific…include values and implications – use evidenced based practice.
  2. Diagnosis (i.e. what criteria are used to diagnose this disease?)
  • Treatment – be specific – how is disease/concern treated? Include diagnostic testing, pharmacotherapeutics, labwork, management protocols, etc.
    1. Tertiary Interventions (Chronic disease management or “wrap-around care” program)
  1. Discharge planning, follow-up, subspecialty referrals, meds, labs…..
  2. Patient education – Detail specifically what the educational needs are…
    1. Conclusions – including what are the implications if we do not respond to this disease….both for the individual and the healthcare system
  1. I highly recommend that you make an appointment with the NIU Writing Center for assistance in preparing this paper. I expect the paper to be in APA format and should be between 20-30 pages in length. Reasonably sized tables and diagrams may be used – but must be cited. Appointments can be scheduled by contacting the Writing Center at https://niu.mywonline.com

 

Overall Evaluation Rubric:

Total possible:  100 points (See sample outline for additional breakdown)

Points may be subtracted for grammar, syntax, neatness, format and professionalism. All assignments must be typed and APA format. Any tables and graphs must be cited.

 

NURS 419 Chronic Disease Synthesis Paper

Sample Outline, Format, and Grading Rubric

 

Title

Identify the name of the disease you have chosen to study. Ex: Diabetes

 

Introduction (5 points)

Provide a brief introduction of your topic and include a discussion of why you chose it. You may use first person in this section.

 

Anatomy and Physiology of the Affected Organ(s)  (5)

Discuss the normal structure and function of the organ(s) related to the disease you have chosen. For example, discuss the normal structure and function of the pancreas. You can include reasonably-sized detail, diagrams, etc.

 

Pathophysiology / Etiology of the Disease  (5)

Discuss what “malfunctions” during the normal function of the organ (pathophysiology). Then discuss what happens as a result of the organ malfunction and explain how this causes the disease (etiology).

 

Incidence and Prevalence of the Disease  (5)

Discuss overall how many cases of the disease are there in the US today (Prevalence). Also discuss how many new cases are occurring annually (Incidence). Based on the I&P, reflect on the magnitude/severity of the problem and its economic burden on society and the health of our nation.

 

Mortality Rates (5)

This section is somewhat similar to the above section, but I want you to reflect on how many people are dying/will die of this disease annually. Include a discussion – if appropriate – related to the comorbidities of this disease. (For example, people don’t usually die of diabetes – they may die of heart disease that has occurred as a result of being a poorly controlled diabetic. Provide any age-adjusted death rate data if available.

 

Risk Factors  (5)

Identify and discuss the risk factors for this disease. Who is at risk? What are the risk factors? Which risk factors are modifiable vs. non-modifiable? How does one change or modify the “modifiable” risk factors?

 

Gold Standard(s) of Care for the Disease  (5)

Discuss the standard of care for each facet of the disease. For example, in diabetes, visit the HP2020 website and research under the “Objectives” tab. You will find 16+ gold standards of care. In addition, for each gold standard, HP2020 includes baseline data r/t where we are with managing the standard today (baseline) and where we would like to see clinical improvement within the next 10 years (Target). If you have selected a topic not included in HP2020 and need assistance, please feel free to contact me. Remember, there are gold standards for prevention, treatment and follow-up of any given disease.

 

Gold Standards for Primary Intervention

Include standards of care for health promotion and disease prevention of your chosen topic. Include baseline data and targets as discussed above. Note: you will identify the standards in this section, but discuss them in detail under the Primary Intervention Section below.

 

Gold Standards for Secondary Intervention

Include standards of care for risk assessment/screening, diagnosis, treatment and pharmacologic management of your chosen topic. Include baseline data and targets as discussed above. Note: you will identify the standards in this section, but discuss them in detail under the Secondary Intervention Section below.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gold Standards for Tertiary Intervention

Include standards of care for chronic disease management of your chosen topic. Include baseline data and targets as discussed above. Note: you will identify the standards in this section, but discuss them in detail under the Tertiary Intervention Section below.

 

Primary Intervention

 

Health Promotion (5)

Provide a discussion related to the topics that would need to be considered when educating a client on how to stay healthy, avoid developing risk factors, how to recognize when to seek care. Don’t forget to educate clients regarding the normal function of the affected organ and what happens when it malfunctions.

 

Disease Prevention (5)

Discuss strategies for the prevention of this disease. Identify what factors can be changed or modified to present individuals from developing the disease.

 

Sample Health Education Program (10)

Create a 1-hour education session using the format from CTE #7. Include any risk factors, health promotion, disease prevention activities, treatment and/or long term management topics that are pertinent. Present the outline below:

    

Program Title: (2)

Keep it simple and short.

 

Brief Description of the Program:  (2)

No more than 1-2 sentences.

 

Goal: (2)

No more than 1-2 sentences.

 

Objectives: (2)

Develop 3-4 objectives. Don’t forget to include the “how” and “what” information in each

objective. Hint: refer to the lecture on primary intervention if you are unsure.

 

Measurable Outcomes:  (2)

Develop 1 measurable outcome for each of the above objectives.

 

Discuss the Role of the Nurse in the Provision of Primary Intervention (5)

Discuss the role of the nurse as provider, designer/manager/coordinator of care in the primary preventive care of individuals, families and communities. Address any legal, ethical or professional issues that the nurse might encounter when rendering preventive care.

 

Secondary Intervention

 

Risk Assessment & Screening (5)

Discuss how are individuals screened for the disease – including those with and without risk factors. Provide an example of a paper or electronic screening/survey. Discuss its reliability and what is typically done with the results/findings. Then discuss any invasive screening/testing that is done. What are the lab values that indicate positive findings? Be sure your examples are evidence-based.

 

Diagnosis (5)

Discuss in detail what criteria are used to confirm diagnosis of the disease? Lab values – include both normal and abnormal values? Testing? Findings on physical examination…

 

 

 

Treatment (5)

Discuss at length treatment/management of the disease. What criteria are used to indicate that the disease has been stabilized?  Discuss and describe in detail diagnostic testing/or labs are monitored as evidence of stabilization – include normal/abnormal values. What other treatment modalities are incorporated – nutrition, physical therapy, social services.

 

Pharmacologic Management (5)

Discuss pharmacotherapeutic management. Identify at least 3 medications used to treat the disease. Identify name; discuss typical dosage, frequency, expected action, potential side effects (mild and severe) and how to manage severe side effects. Identify any known contraindications to the medication.

 

Discuss the Role of the Nurse in the Provision of Secondary Intervention (5)

Discuss the role of the nurse as provider, designer/manager/coordinator of care in the secondary preventive care of individuals, families and communities. Address any legal, ethical or professional issues that the nurse might encounter when rendering secondary care.

 

 Tertiary Intervention

 

Long Term Chronic Disease Management (5)

Discuss discharge planning and long term management/care of the patient with this disease. What types of referrals, follow-ups are needed. Discuss education that needs to be completed/reinforced to support the client’s ability to function independently or with assistance. Identify routine labwork that will need to be done. Discuss typical medications at discharge – what needs to be taught to the client regarding the self-administration of these meds?

 

 

The Role of the Nurse in Chronic Disease Management (5)

Discuss the roles of the nurse – as they relate to tertiary intervention – in supporting treatment/management of the disease in the outpatient and home setting. How does the nurse support/facilitate a return to an optimum state of wellness? Discuss any necessary home care, referrals, follow-up or changes that need to be made in the client’s living arrangement to ensure safety. Note: you do not need to include a patient education – content outline.

 

Be sure to discuss the role of the nurse as provider, designer/manager/coordinator of care in the tertiary care of individuals, families and communities. Address any legal, ethical or professional issues that the nurse might encounter when rendering tertiary care.

 

Conclusion (5)

Discuss what you learned from preparing this paper. As a health care system – what things are we doing well to manage this disease? As a health care system – what things are we not doing well and how does it negatively impact the care and well-being of clients with this disease. Are we cost-effectively managing this disease? What are the opportunities for improvement? What will be the consequences if we do not capture the opportunities for improvement? You may use first person in this section.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revised 8/24/2021