Health & Medical Question Assignment

44 (44%) – 44 (44%)

• Thoroughly responds to the discusion question(s)

  • Is reflecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

  • Supported by at least 3 current, credible sources

40 (40%) – 43 (43%)

• Responds to the discusion question(s)

  • Is reflecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module.

  • 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth

  • Supported by at least 3 credible references

35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

• Responds to most of the discusion question(s)

  • Is somewhat reflecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module.

  • 50% of post has exceptional depth and breadth

  • Supported by at least 3 credible references. Health & Medical Question Assignment

31 (31%) – 34 (34%)

• Responds to some of the discusion question(s)

  • One to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addresed

  • Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis

  • Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

  • Post is cited with fewer than 2 credible references

0 (0%) – 30 (30%)

• Does not respond to the discusion question(s)

  • Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria

  •lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis

  • Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

  • Contains only 1 or no credible references

6 (6%) – 6 (6%)

• Written clearly and concisely

  • Contains no grammatical or spelling errors

  • Fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style

5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)

• Written clearly and concisely

  • May contain one or no grammatical or spelling error

  • Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

• Written concisely

  • May contain one to two grammatical or spelling error

  • Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style

4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)

• Writtten somewhat concisely

  • May contain more than two2 spelling or grammatical errors

  • Contains some APA formatting erros

0 (0%) – 4 (4%)

• Not written clearly or concisely

  • Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors

  • Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style

10 (10%) – 10 (10%)

• Meets requirements for timely and full participation

  • Posts main discussion by due date

0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

0 (0%) – 6 (6%)

• Does not meet requirement for full participation

9 (9%) – 9 (9%)

• Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings

  • Responds to questions posed by faculty

  • The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives

8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%)

• Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings

7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%)

• Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting

6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)

• Response is on topic, may have some depth

0 (0%) – 6 (6%)

• Reponse may not be on topic, lacks depth

6 (6%) – 6 (6%)

• Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues

  • Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed

  • Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources

  • Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English

5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)

• Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues

  • Response to faculty questions are answered if posed

  • Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources

  • Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

• Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues

  • Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed

  • Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources

  • Response is written in Standard Edited English

4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)

• Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication

  • Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed

  • Few or no credible sources are cited

0 (0%) – 4 (4%)

• Responses posted in the discussion lack effective

  • Response to faculty questions are missing

  • No credible sources are cited

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

• Meets requirements for timely and full participation

  • Posts by due date

0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

0 (0%) – 4 (4%)

• Does not meet requirement for full participation

9 (9%) – 9 (9%)

• Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings

  • Responds to questions posed by faculty

  • The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives

8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%)

• Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings

7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%)

• Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting

6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)

• Response is on topic, may have some depth

0 (0%) – 6 (6%)

• Response may not be on topic, lacks depth

6 (6%) – 6 (6%)

• Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues

  • Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed

  • Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources

  • Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English

5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)

• Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues

  • Response to faculty questions are answered if posed

  • Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources

  • Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English. Health & Medical Question Assignment

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

• Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues

  • Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed

  • Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources

  • Response is written in Standard Edited English

4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)

• Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication

  • Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed

  • Few or no credible sources are cited

0 (0%) – 4 (4%)

>• Responses posted in the discussion lack effective

• Response to faculty questions are missing

• No credible sources are cited

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

• Meets requirements for timely and full participation

  • Posts by due date

0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

• Does not meet requirement for full participation