Compare and contrast two change theories, and determine which theory makes the most sense for implementing your specific EBP project. Why? Has your mentor used either theory, and to what result? This is for a nursing school assignment. My project is cathe

/in /by

This is for a nursing school assignment. My project is catheter related urinary tract infection(UTI), and the theory supposed to be a nursing field. I need it as soon as possible. At least two references (peer reviewed research paper or a 1 book and 1 research paper).

Assignment PICOT Statement Paper

/in /by

View Rubric   Due Date:   Feb 22Details:Review the Topic Materials and the work completed in NRS-433V to   formulate a PICOT statement for your capstone project.A PICOT starts with a designated patient population in a particular   clinical area and identifies clinical problems or issues that arise   from clinical care. The intervention should be an independent,   specified nursing change intervention. The intervention cannot require   a provider prescription. Include a comparison to a patient population   not currently receiving the intervention, and specify the timeframe   needed to implement the change process.Formulate a PICOT statement using the PICOT format provided in the   assigned readings. The PICOT statement will provide a framework for   your capstone project.In a paper of 500-750 words, clearly identify the clinical problem   and how it can result in a positive patient outcome.Make sure to address the following on the PICOT statement:Evidence-Based SolutionNursing InterventionPatient CareHealth Care AgencyNursing   PracticePrepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA   Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to   beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for   successful completion.You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer   to the directions in the Student Success Center.Apply RubricsPICOT Statement Paper1Unsatisfactory0.00%                                                     2Less than Satisfactory75.00%                                                     3Satisfactory79.00%                                                     4Good89.00%                                                     5Excellent100.00%                            80.0 %Content     30.0 % Identification of Clinical Problem/Issue                                                   Clinical problem/issue is not identified, and resolution is not addressed.                                                  Clinical problem/issue is identified with little discussion of resolution or patient outcome.                                                  Clinical problem/issue is identified but not  supported with clinical observations or evidence. The identified  problem/issue can be resolved, or a patient outcome shows minimal  improvement.                                                  Clinical problem/issue is identified based  on clinical observation experience or evidence in literature. Articles  are cited to support the need for change in nursing practice. The  identified problem/issue can be resolved, or a patient outcome can be  improved using nursing interventions.                                                  Clinical problem/issue is identified based  on key concepts that define evidence-based practice or clinical  experience. Articles are cited to support the need for change in nursing  practice. The identified problem/issue can be resolved, or a patient  outcome can show a marked improvement through a nursing intervention.   30.0 % Clinical  Problem/Issue, Including Description, Evidence-Based Solution, Nursing  Intervention, Patient Care, Health Care Agency, and Nursing Practice                                                   Clinical problem/issue is not described with  clarity and the corresponding elements are not included.                                                  Clinical problem/issue description includes a  basic understanding of the problem/issue and setting, with few of the  following elements explained: evidence-based solution, nursing  intervention, patient care, health care agency, and nursing practice.                                                  Clinical problem/issue description includes a  basic understanding of the problem/issue, the setting, and the patient  population. The following elements are explained: evidence-based  solution, nursing intervention, patient care, health care agency, and  nursing practice. Minimal rationale is provided to support the  resolution of the clinical problem/issue.                                                  Clinical problem/issue description includes a  thorough understanding of the problem/issue, the setting, the patient  population, and why it is a problem/issue. The following elements are  explained in detail: evidence-based solution, nursing intervention, and  patient care consistent with specific health care agency and nursing  practice. Sound rationale is provided supporting the clinical  problem/issue resolution.                                                  Clinical problem/issue description includes a  developed and thorough explanation of the problem/issue, the setting,  the patient population, and the rationale for why it is a problem/issue.  The identified clinical problem/issue explains the following elements  with detail and clarity: evidence-based solution, nursing intervention,  and improved patient care consistent with specific health care agency  resulting in nursing practice change. Sound rationale is provided in the  discussion of the clinical problem/issue resolution.   10.0 % PICOT Statement Focused on Resolution, Improvement, Application, and Intervention                                                   PICOT statement does not focus on resolution  of a problem/issue, improvement of patient care or application of a  nursing intervention.                                                  PICOT statement discusses a clinical problem/issue without a focus on improvement or intervention.                                                  PICOT statement focuses on the resolution of  a clinical problem/issue that improves patient care through the  application of a nursing intervention.                                                  PICOT statement focuses on the resolution of  a clinical problem/issue, with discussion of improving patient care  through the application of an evidenced-based nursing intervention.                                                  PICOT statement clearly focuses on the  resolution of a clinical problem/issue and aims at improving patient  care through the application of an evidenced-based nursing intervention.   10.0 % PICOT Statement Including Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, and Time                                                   Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, and Time are not included.                                                  Population, Intervention, Comparison,  Outcomes, and Time are present, but lack detail or are incomplete.                                                  Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, and Time are present.                                                  Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, and Time are clearly provided and well developed.                                                  Population, Intervention, Comparison,  Outcomes, and Time are comprehensive and thoroughly developed with  supporting details.   15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness     5.0 % Presentation                                                   Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.                                                  Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.                                                  Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.                                                  Thesis is clear and forecasts the  development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the  arguments and appropriate to the purpose.                                                  Thesis is comprehensive and contains the  essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper  clear.   5.0 % Argument Logic and Construction                                                   Statement of purpose is not justified by the  conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is  incoherent and uses noncredible sources.                                                  Sufficient justification of claims is  lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the  logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.                                                  Argument is orderly, but may have a few  inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims.  Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources  used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.                                                   Argument shows logical progressions.  Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression  of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are  authoritative.                                                  Clear and convincing argument that presents a  persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources  are authoritative.   5.0 % Mechanics of Writing  (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)                                                   Surface errors are pervasive enough that  they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or  sentence construction is used.                                                  Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors  distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register),  sentence structure, or word choice are present.                                                  Some mechanical errors or typos are present,  but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence  structure and audience-appropriate language are used.                                                   Prose is largely free of mechanical errors,  although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and  effective figures of speech are used.                                                   Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.   5.0 %Format      2.0 % Paper Format  (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)                                                   Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.                                                  Template is used, but some elements are  missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.                                                  Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.                                                   Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.                                                  All format elements are correct.    5.0 %Format      3.0 % Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)                                                   Sources are not documented.                                                  Documentation of sources is inconsistent or  incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous  formatting errors.                                                  Sources are documented, as appropriate to  assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.                                                  Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.                                                   Sources are completely and correctly  documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free  of error.     100 % Total Weightage

Overall Critique of a Qualitative Research Report

/in /by

Complete the Guide to an Overall Critique of a Qualitative Research Report worksheet for the qualitative article you selected.Qualitative article is being Attached, and the  Guide to an Overall Critique of a Qualitative Research Report is attached too.Attention: What i need is to answer all the questions from the guide utilizing the article attached. Please read carefully the article. P;ease Dot Not invent. answers have to come from article. Professor will read article and compared with the answers in the guide. All questions needed to be answered. please do not miss questions. Yes or not plain answers not allowed. Needs to be explained why yes or why not.Another instruction:1 st page start with a cover page, then answer all questions with not exemption and last page needs to have the references.Remember: This is a Master Level. Please I Need to get an A in this.Thank you!!

Reimbursement of Claims

/in /by

– This assignment about Saudi Arabia- Follow instructions in the attached file carefully- Avoid Plagiarism- 5 pages  not including the cover page and the references.- follow APA style.- provide in-text citationKindly stick to your price if you change I will dispute

Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Project—Paper on Diabetes

/in /by

Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Project—Paper on DiabetesIdentify a research or evidence-based article that focuses comprehensively on a specific intervention or new diagnostic tool for the treatment of diabetes in adults or children.In a paper of 750-1,000 words, summarize the main idea of the research findings for a specific patient population. Research must include clinical findings that are current, thorough, and relevant to diabetes and the nursing practice.Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin.125.0 Evidence-Based Practice Project—Intervention Presentation on DiabetesBased on the summary of research findings identified from the Evidence-Based Project—Paper on Diabetes that describes a new diagnostic tool or intervention for the treatment of diabetes in adults or children, complete the following components of this assignment:Develop a PowerPoint presentation (a title slide, 6-12 slides, and a reference slide; no larger than 2 MB) that includes the following:A brief summary of the research conducted in the Evidence-Based Project – Paper on Diabetes.A descriptive and reflective discussion of how the new tool or intervention may be integrated into practice that is supported by sound research.While APA format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin, Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin.

Safeguarding Children

/in /by

Critically analyse and justify your professional role in identifying and responding to children affected by one category of child abuse with reference to research, policy, practice and legal issues. In addition to this suggest and critically analyse how partnership working can inhibit and facilitate your professional role with regard to your chosen category.

Mobilization Plan

/in /by

ITS IMPORTAT TO MEET THE COMPETENCES. THATS HOW I GET EVALUATED.Create an 8–10-slide mobilization plan PowerPoint presentation (with detailed speaker’s notes) for a mobilization plan by your health care organization to commit 20 nurses to participate in a 4-month-long multinational effort to treat patients exposed to a highly contagious virus in a hot zone in Africa.Nursing leaders must incorporate approaches that are inclusive and respectful of all stakeholders in the health care workforce, patient population, and the larger community that is served by the organization. Communication among members of teams, between departments and service lines, within large networks, with strategic business partners, and with patients, families, or support persons requires awareness of various facets of effective communication and cultural competence.A mobilization plan for an international medical mission requires careful planning of organizational structure roles, power distribution, and team member empowerment.By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:(IMPORTANT) Competency 1: Identify nursing leadership priorities, using a systems perspective.-Apply systems thinking to determine a) the impact of the mobilization effort on hospital staffing and b) the actions needed to assure safe, quality care for the mission patients and personnel.(IMPORTANT) Competency 2: Apply systems theory and systems thinking to facilitate health care delivery and patient outcomes.-Identify the major stakeholders within the health care system that would be affected by the mobilization plan.(IMPORTANT) Competency 3: Analyze the role of multiculturalism and diversity in organizational and systems structure and leadership.-Examine potential multicultural and diversity issues that mission personnel may encounter.(IMPORTANT) Competency 4: Evaluate how power relates to health care organizational structure, behavior, and leadership.-Describe the medical mission team’s organizational structure and assess how this structure empowers team members.(IMPORTANT) Competency 5: Communicate in a manner that is consistent with the expectations of a nursing professional.Write content clearly and logically, with correct use of grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and current APA style.Assessment InstructionsPreparationUse the Capella library and the Internet to help you complete this assessment. For help using PowerPoint, refer to the Microsoft Tutorials and other resources located in the Suggested Resources and left navigation menu of the courseroom.This assessment is based upon the scenario below. The scenario is very limited in detail; where more detail is needed, incorporate any assumptions you make to flesh out the scenario. It is intended to assess your ability to communicate your approach to a challenge by evaluating issues of organization, leadership, safety, quality improvement, multiculturalism and diversity.Your approach should be very conceptual and high-level.ScenarioYour health care organization has recently committed 20 nurses to participate in a 4-month-long multinational effort to treat patients exposed to a highly contagious virus in a “hot zone” in Africa. The director of your organization has asked you, because of your previous medical mission experience, to outline nursing-related plans for preparing for the mobilization and present this information at an upcoming staff meeting.Deliverable: Mobilization Plan PowerPoint PresentationCreate an 8–10-slide PowerPoint presentation (with detailed speaker’s notes) of your mobilization plan. It should be targeted toward members of the hospital’s administrative staff, nurses, and the physicians who will also participate in this medical mission.Use bullet points and phrases on the slides.The narrative, or explanation for each slide, should be in the speaker’s notes section.The mobilization plan should address the following:Identify the major stakeholders within the health care system that would be affected by the mobilization plan.Analyze how the mobilization effort will impact staffing patterns and nursing care at the hospital.Describe the medical mission team’s organizational structure of the mission team and how power is distributed.Include one slide of an organizational diagram for the mission.Describe the roles (in the speaker’s notes).Assess how the organizational structure empowers team members.Provide 1–2 examples of how team members will have power.Identify key actions needed to assure quality of care and safety for mission patients and personnel.Evaluate potential power issues that may arise when dealing with a multinational contingent.(Be generic; that is, do not address individual nationalities, races, et cetera.)Consider interactions with health care personnel from other countries.Examine potential multicultural and diversity issues that mission personnel may encounter.Consider that the indigenous population may be hostile to treatment.Outline possible training requirements to improve cultural competencies of the personnel.Additional RequirementsWritten communication: Written communication should be free of errors that detract from the overall message.APA formatting: Resources and in-text citations should be formatted according to current APA style and formatting.Length: Presentation should be 8–10 slides. Include speaker’s notes on each content slide.References: Include a minimum of three peer-reviewed resources on the final slide (in APA format).General formatting: Choose an appropriate theme if using a template.

NURS 6565 Week 10

/in /by

Discussion: State Practice AgreementsThis week you will have an opportunity to evaluate state practice agreements in your state and examine issues related to NP practice.To prepare:Review practice agreements in your stateIdentify at least two physician collaboration issues in your stateBy Day 3Post a brief description of the practice agreements for NPs in your state and the two physician collaboration issues that you identified. Explain what you think are the barriers to NPs practicing independently in your state. Finally, outline a plan for how you might address NP practice issues in your state.GEORGIA

The Impact of Standardized Nursing Terminology

/in /by

Among the Resources in this module is the Rutherford (2008) article Standardized Nursing Language: What Does It Mean for Nursing Practice? In this article, the author recounts a visit to a local hospital to view the recent implementation of a new coding system.During the visit, one of the nurses commented to her, “We document our care using standardized nursing languages but we don’t fully understand why we do” (Rutherford, 2008, para. 1).How would you respond to a comment such as this one?To Prepare:Review the concepts of informatics as presented in the Resources, particularly Rutherford, M. (2008) Standardized Nursing Language: What Does It Mean for Nursing Practice?Reflect on the role of a nurse leader as a knowledge worker.Consider how knowledge may be informed by data that is collected/accessed.The Assignment:In a 2- to 3-page paper, address the following:Explain how you would inform this nurse (and others) of the importance of standardized nursing terminologies.Describe the benefits and challenges of implementing standardized nursing terminologies in nursing practice. Be specific and provide examples.Be sure to support your paper with peer-reviewed research on standardized nursing terminologies that you consulted from the your school.Resources:Rutherford, M. A. (2008). Standardized nursing language: What does it mean for nursing practice? Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 13(1), 1–12. doi:10.3912/OJIN.Vol13No01PPT05.McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. G. (2017). Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge (4th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.Chapter 25, “The Art of Caring in Technology-Laden Environments” (pp. 525–535)Chapter 26, “Nursing Informatics and the Foundation of Knowledge” (pp. 537–551)https://www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/snt_final_05302017.pdfRubric:In a 2- to 3-page paper, address the following:·   Explain how you would inform this nurse (and others) of the importance of standardized nursing terminologies.·   Describe the benefits and challenges of implementing standardized nursing terminologies in nursing practice. Be specific and provide examples.·   Be sure to support your paper with peer-reviewed research on standardized nursing terminologies that you consulted from the Walden Library.–Levels of Achievement:  Excellent 77 (77%) – 85 (85%)    Good 68 (68%) – 76 (76%)    Fair 60 (60%) – 67 (67%)    Poor 0 (0%) – 59 (59%)Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.–Levels of Achievement:  Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)    Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)    Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)    Poor 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation–Levels of Achievement:  Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)    Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)    Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)    Poor 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.–Levels of Achievement:  Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)    Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)    Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)    Poor 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Evidence-Based Capstone Project, Part 6: Disseminating Results

/in /by

The dissemination of EBP results serves multiple important roles. Sharing results makes the case for your decisions. It also adds to the body of knowledge, which creates opportunities for future practitioners. By presenting results, you also become an advocate for EBP, creating a culture within your organization or beyond that informs, educates, and promotes the effective use of EBP.To Prepare:Review the final PowerPoint presentation you submitted in Module 5, and make any necessary changes based on the feedback you have received and on lessons you have learned throughout the course.Consider the best method of disseminating the results of your presentation to an audience.To Complete:Create a 5-minute, 5- to 6-slide narrated PowerPoint presentation of your Evidence-Based Project.Be sure to incorporate any feedback or changes from your presentation submission in Module 5.Explain how you would disseminate the results of your project to an audience. Provide a rationale for why you selected this dissemination strategy.