Jazz Case study 6

SEE Attachment

Week 3 Assignment: Healthcare Policy

In this assignment, you will assess the impact of health legislation on nursing practice and communicate your analysis to your peers. GovTrack.us provides a list of federal health bills that are currently in process in Congressional Committees.CO4: Integrates clinical nursing judgment using effective communication strategies with patients, colleagues, and other healthcare providers. (PO#4)CO7: Integrates the professional role of leader, teacher, communicator, and manager of care to plan cost-effective, quality healthcare to consumers in structured and unstructured settings. (PO#7)

Assignment Question

Find the attached documents

Foundations of Nursing Research Discussion 2

To learn more about qualitative designs, please visit the following website: Qualitative Research Designshttps://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/content/enforced/64760-17068522/media/transcripts/week2/NIESWIADOMY10.pdf?_&d2lSessionVal=mm93ajFSNMGHSHkCJmPPfJoRiFor quantitative designs, please visit the following website: Research Designshttps://explorable.com/research-designsTo support your work, use your course and text readings and also use resources from the South University Online Library. As in all assignments, cite your sources in your work and provide references for the citations in APA format. You may use this APA Citation Helper as a convenient reference for properly citing resources.TASKPost your initial response to one of the two topics below.Topic 1Based on the following titles of research studies, identify what you believe to be the design of the study and the rationale for your selection. Refer to the links above for descriptions of research designs.Determining the effect of position on heel pressure in older adults.Factors that influenced the development of democracy in America.The relationship between  physical activity and GPA in nursing students.Determining the effect of a new drug to treat brain tumorsCoping strategies of chronically ill men and women.Determining the incidence of drug abuse in RNs in community hospitals.The meaning of living with  COPD.Exploring the Aborigine culture.Topic 2Select one of the suggested references listed below. Based on your selection, complete the following tasks:Identify and describe the research problem, purpose, objectives, and hypothesis identified in the article.Describe how you would evaluate the credibility and validity of the study.ReferencesFitzwater, J., Johnstone, C., Schippers, M., Cordoza, M., & Norman, B.  (2019). A comparison of oral, axillary, and temporal artery temperature  measuring devices in adult acute care. MEDSURG Nursing 28 (1), 35-41.Gibbon, G. & Crane, J. (2018). The impact of ‘missed care’ on the professional socialisation of nursing students: A qualitative research study. Nurse Education Today 66(2018), 19-24.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.04.002Purtzer, M.A., Hermansen-Kobulnicky, C.J. (2016). Optimizing the benefits of self-monitoring among patients with cancer. Oncology Nursing Forum 43(6), E218-225.         doi: 10.1188/16.ONF.E218-E225Tongvichean, T., Aungsuroch, Y., & Preechawong, S. (2019). Effect of self-management exercise program on physical fitness among people with prehypertension and obesity: A quasi experiment study. Pacific Rim International Journal of Research, 23(1), 6-17.

assessment and proposes a strategic plan to ensure readiness.

assessment and proposes a strategic plan to ensure readiness.

DQ#10NRNP

To prepare:· Review this week’s Learning Resources and reflect on the insights they provide.· Read the case study I am Feeling Like I’m Going Crazy· For guidance on assessing the client, refer to pages 137-142 of the Wheeler text in this week’s Learning Resources.·Note: For this Discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by clicking on the Post to Discussion Question link and then select Create Thread to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click submit, you cannot delete or edit your own posts, and you cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking Submit!By Day1-Post an Explanation of the most likely DSM-5 diagnosis for the client in the case study.2- Be sure to link those behaviors to the criteria in the DSM-5. Then,3- Explain Group Therapeutic Approaches you might use with this patient.4-Explain expected Outcomes for the client based on these therapeutic approaches.5-Finally consider Legal and Ethical implications of counseling children and adolescent clients with psychiatric disorders.6-Support your approach with evidence-based literature.

Final Care Coordination Plan

Assessment 4 Instructions: Final Care Coordination PlanFor this assessment, you will simulate implementation of the preliminary care coordination plan you developed in Assessment 1. The presentation would be structured for the hypothetical patient.NOTE: You are required to complete this assessment after Assessment 1 is successfully completed.Care coordination is the process of providing a smooth and seamless transition of care as part of the health continuum. Nurses must be aware of community resources, ethical considerations, policy issues, cultural norms, safety, and the physiological needs of patients. Nurses play a key role in providing the necessary knowledge and communication to ensure seamless transitions of care. They draw upon evidence-based practices to promote health and disease prevention to create a safe environment conducive to improving and maintaining the health of individuals, families, or aggregates within a community. When provided with a plan and the resources to achieve and maintain optimal health, patients benefit from a safe environment conducive to healing and a better quality of life.This assessment provides an opportunity to research the literature and apply evidence to support what communication, teaching, and learning best practices are needed for a hypothetical patient with a selected health care problem.You are encouraged to complete the Vila Health: Cultural Competence activity prior to completing this assessment. Completing course activities before submitting your first attempt has been shown to make the difference between basic and proficient assessment.Demonstration of ProficiencyBy successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment scoring guide criteria:Competency 1: Adapt care based on patient-centered and person-focused factors.Design patient-centered health interventions and timelines for care delivered through direct clinical interaction that is logged in the CORE ELMS system.Competency 2: Collaborate with patients and family to achieve desired outcomes.Use the literature on evaluation as a guide to compare learning session content with best practices.Competency 3: Create a satisfying patient experience.Describe what the literature says about effective care coordination and patient satisfaction verses experience, including how to align teaching sessions to the Healthy people 2020 document..Competency 4: Defend decisions based on the code of ethics for nursing.Make ethical decisions in designing patient-centered health interventions.Competency 5: Explain how health care policies affect patient-centered care.Identify relevant health policy implications for the coordination and continuum of care.PreparationIn this assessment, you will implement the preliminary care coordination plan you developed in Assessment 1 and communicate the plan to the hypothetical patient in a professional, culturally sensitive, and ethical manner.To prepare for the assessment, consider the patient experience and how you would present the plan.Note: Remember that you can submit all, or a portion of, your plan toSmarthinking Tutoringfor feedback, before you submit the final version for this assessment. If you plan on using this free service, be mindful of the turnaround time of 24–48 hours for receiving feedback.InstructionsNote: You are required to complete Assessment 1 before this assessment.For this assessment:Build on the preliminary plan, developed in Assessment 1, to complete a comprehensive care coordination plan.Document Format and LengthBuild on the preliminary plan document you created in Assessment 1. Your final plan should be 5–7 pages in length.Supporting EvidenceSupport your care coordination plan with peer-reviewed articles, course study resources, and Healthy People 2020 resources. Cite at least three credible sources.Grading RequirementsThe requirements, outlined below, correspond to the grading criteria in the Final Care Coordination Plan Scoring Guide, so be sure to address each point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.Design patient-centered health interventions and timelines for care.Address three patient health issues.Design an intervention for each health issue.Identify three community resources for each health intervention, so the patient may make an informed decision about what resources to use.Consider ethical decisions in designing patient-centered health interventions.Consider the practical effects of specific decisions.Include the ethical questions that generate uncertainty about the decisions you have made.Identify relevant health policy implications for the coordination and continuum of care.Cite specific health policy provisions.What does the literature say about evaluation in care coordination?How might revisions to the plan improve future outcomes?What does literature say about:Effective care coordination and patient satisfaction verses experience?How to align teaching sessions to the Healthy People 2020 document?Additional RequirementsBefore submitting your assessment, proofread your final care coordination plan to minimize errors that could distract readers and make it more difficult for them to focus on the substance of your plan.Portfolio Prompt: Save your presentation to yourePortfolio. Submissions to the ePortfolio will be part of your final Capstone course.Scoring GuideUse the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated.

Write a critical appraisal

Write a critical appraisal that demonstrates comprehension of two qualitative research studies. Use the “Research Critique Guidelines – Part 1” document to organize your essay. Successful completion of this assignment requires that you provide rationale, include examples, and reference content from the studies in your responses.Use the practice problem and two qualitative, peer-reviewed research article you identified in the Topic 1 assignment to complete this assignment.In a 1,000–1,250 word essay, summarize two qualitative studies, explain the ways in which the findings might be used in nursing practice, and address ethical considerations associated with the conduct of the study.Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

Healthcare reimbursement

Assignment:Complete the following case studies using the CSM-1500 and UB-04 forms.CSM-1500 form:Appendix A: Case A-6 Carlos Clemenza pp. 570- 572Appendix B: Case B-16: Earl Abbot pp. 648- 649UB-04 form:Appendix C : Case C-4: Harold Janovich pp. 666-667Case-18: Tyrone Clark pp. 694-695Assignment Expectations:Length:The amount of information needed for the formsStructure:no title or reference page requiredaddress each question in a numbered listReferences:no references requiredFormat:save your assignment as filled PDF documents

Proposing a New Initiative (Ass#1) 6008

Assessment 1• Proposing a New InitiativeResearch an economic opportunity that might be available within your health care setting that will provide ethical and culturally equitable improvements to the quality of care. Then, write a 2–4-page proposal for an initiative to take advantage of that opportunity, supported with economic data and an analysis of the prospective benefits.Note: Each assessment in this course builds upon the work you have completed in previous assessments. Therefore, you must complete the assessments in the order in which they are presented.Master’s-level health care practitioners are charged with the responsibility of constantly scanning the external environment for shifts in the supply of, and demand for, services. Concurrently, leaders must examine their organization’s strategic direction and determine whether adjustments must be made to current service offerings, whether equipment updates are needed, whether staffing models should be changed, and whether other decisions must be made. Each decision that is proposed must be evaluated in terms of the organization as a system, alignment with the organization’s mission and strategy, available internal resources, potential contract and payer source implications, and the short- and long-term economic effects at both the micro and macro levels.Health Care Supply and DemandThe following multimedia animation illustrates elastic and inelastic demand curves, with changes in price.Medical Care Demand Elasticities.The following multimedia simulation presents the many concerns of stakeholders about the potential effects on an existing hospital system of a proposed mobile clinic for veterans with PTSD.Vila Health: A New Mobile Clinic.The following multimedia self-check activities will aid you in defining terms commonly used in discussions of health care economics.The Demand for Health.U.S. Health Care System Issues.Understanding supply and demand in health care can be crucial to effective cost management and fiscal responsibility. This author explains the concept well by the use of examples and strategies for success.Indresano, R. (2016). How to rebalance the supply-demand scales in healthcare. Retrieved from https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/patient-engagement/how-to-rebalance-the-supply-demand-scales-in-healthcare.htmlThe following article addresses the how and why behind the concept of spending efficiently in health care organizations. Examining the costs and benefits of economic opportunities is the key to success for leaders that know how to do more with less.Doi, S., Ide, H., & Takeuchi, K., Fujita, S., & Takabayashi, K. (2017). Estimation and evaluation of future demand and supply of healthcare services based on a patient access area model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(11), 1367–1381.Health Care CostsThe following article provides a good example of the impact that the current health care environment has had on the practice of nurse practitioners. Many of these restrictions are similar toother disciplines, while others are unique to health care providers. This is important from the perspective of both the care giver and patients.Chattopadhyay, S., & Zangaro, G. (2019). The economic cost and impacts of scope of practice restrictions on nurse practitioners. Nursing Economics, 37(6), 273–283.The following article addresses the financial impact of health care and why health care executives and leaders play such a fiduciary role between the organization and environment. What is revealed is why the application of research and best practices becomes paramount for successful fiscal management for health care organization’s viability and sustainability.Lyford, S., & Lash, T. A. (2019). America’s healthcare cost crisis: As the costs of U.S. healthcare continue to escalate, three commonsense reforms could reverse this unsustainable trend. Generations, 7–12.Economic InitiativesThe following articles address the critical importance of aligning the quality of patient care initiatives with cost-effectiveness. The creation of service lines and the improvement of current practices must be sustainable and realistic to meet the challenges of ongoing performance improvement from the perspective of productivity standards.Bennett, L. E., Jewell, V. D., Scheirton, L., McCarthy, M., & Muir, B. C. (2019). Productivity standards and the impact on quality of care: A national survey of inpatient rehabilitation professionals. Open Journal of Occupational Therapy, 7(4), 1–11.Lin, C., Romley, J. A., & Carlin, C. (2018). The relationship between the patient-centered medical homes, healthcare expenditures, and quality of care among children with special health care needs. Maternal & Child Health Journal, 22(12), 1751–1760.The following article addresses the provision of free health care services and the evaluation of the program’s impacts.Edoka, I., Ensor, T., McPake, B., Amara, R., Tseng, F.-M., & Edem-Hotah, J. (2016). Free health care for under-fives, expectant and recent mothers? Evaluating the impact of Sierra Leone’s free health care initiative. Health Economics Review, 6(19), 1–15. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4877339/The following interesting article provides the perspective of the cost evaluation process with use of a trial for a new initiative. It can be identified why a trial run can be benefit when exploring the opportunities for management of the costs from before and after the plan is implemented.Panagioti, M., Reeves, D., Meacock, R., Parkinson, B., Lovell, K., Hann, M., . . . Bower, P. (2018). Is telephone health coaching a useful population health strategy for supporting older people with multimorbidity? An evaluation of reach, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness using a ‘trial within a cohort’. BMC Medicine, 16(1), 1–15.The following article addresses the impact of an economic initiative on cost, utilization, and outcomes.Rhodes, K. V., Basseyn, S., Gallop, R., Noll, E., Rothbard, A., & Crits-Christoph, P. (2016). Pennsylvania’s medical home initiative: Reductions in healthcare utilization and cost among Medicaid patients with medical and psychiatric comorbidities. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 31(11), 1373–1381. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5071276/Ethical and Cultural IssuesThe systemic review findings in the following article include evidence that interventions to improve cultural competency can improve patient or client health outcomes.Truong, M., Paradies, Y., & Priest, N. (2014). Interventions to improve cultural competency in healthcare: A systematic review of reviews. BMC Health Services Research, 14, 99. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3946184/Library Research GuidesYou may choose other resources to prepare for this assessment; however, you will need to ensure that they are appropriate, credible, and valid. The following library guides can help direct your research.MHA Program Library Guide.MSN Program Library Research Guide.Public Health Masters Program Library Guide.Additional Resources for Further ExplorationReview the following:Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (n.d.). National Center for Health Statistics. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://cms.gov/National Institutes of Health. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.nih.gov/Assessment InstructionsResearch an economic opportunity that might be available within your health care setting—at both micro (departmental, neighborhood) and macro (organizational, community) levels—that you believe will provide ethical and culturally equitable improvements to the quality of care. Then, propose an initiative to take advantage of that opportunity. Support your proposal with economic data (sector growth, supply versus demand, cost versus reimbursement, et cetera) and an analysis of the prospective benefits for your department and for the organization overall.Such economic opportunities might include offering a new service line, working to improve a service line already offered, retiring an outdated or unprofitable service line, or any other initiative you believe will be of benefit to your organization in the short and long term. One example is a recently launched partnership with a local bicycle sharing company. Your organization partners with them to host healthy community events that offer free screenings for early detection of various health issues. Free screenings help fulfill some of your organization’s preventive and healthy lifestyle initiatives, while also potentially driving referrals to other services provided by your organization.Note: Your proposal will serve as the basis for subsequent assessments in this course.Note: Remember that you can submit all, or a portion of, your draft proposal to Smarthinking for feedback before you submit the final version for this assessment. If you plan on using this free service, be mindful of the turnaround time of 24–48 hours for receiving feedback.RequirementsThe requirements for your proposal, outlined below, correspond to the scoring guide criteria, so be sure to address each main point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. In addition, be sure to note the requirements for document format, length, and supporting evidence.Explain why your proposed initiative presents a viable and beneficial economic opportunity for your organization.Describe your proposed service line or economic initiative.Explain why your proposal presents an economic opportunity at the micro level and macro level.Explain how your proposed initiative will provide ethical and culturally equitable improvements to the quality of care.Analyze the economic factors of supply and demand associated with your proposed initiative, within a context relevant to your organization or care setting.What do economic and demographic data suggest is the supply and demand?What additional information would improve your analysis?Explain how relevant economic and environmental data support your proposed initiative.How does the data illustrate a potential opportunity and the economic viability of your proposal?Write concisely and directly, using active voice.Proofread your proposal before you submit it to minimize errors that could distract readers and make it more difficult for them to focus on the substance of your proposal.Support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant and credible evidence.Example Assessment: You may use the following to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like:Assessment 1 Example [PDF].Additional RequirementsYour assessment should also meet the following requirements:Format: Format your proposal using current APA style. Use the APA Style Paper Template [DOCX]. An APA Style Paper Tutorial [DOCX] is also provided to help you in writing and formatting your proposal. Be sure to include:A title page and references page. An abstract is not required.A running head on all pages.Appropriate section headings.Length: Your proposal should be 2–4 pages in length, not including the title page and references page.Supporting evidence: Cite 3–5 authoritative and scholarly resources to support your proposal. Be sure that your sources include specific economic data.Note: Faculty may use the Writing Feedback Tool when grading this assessment. The Writing Feedback Tool is designed to provide you with guidance and resources to develop your writing based on five core skills. You will find writing feedback in the Scoring Guide for the assessment, after your work has been evaluated.Portfolio Prompt: You may choose to save your proposal to your ePortfolio.Competencies MeasuredBy successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment scoring guide criteria:Competency 1: Analyze the effects of financial and economic factors (such as cost-benefit, supply and demand, return on investment, and risks) in a health care system on patient care, services offered, and organizational structures and operation.Analyze the economic factors of supply and demand associated with a proposed initiative, within a context relevant to a particular organization or care setting.Competency 2: Develop ethical and culturally equitable solutions to economic problems within a health care organization in an effort to improve the quality of care and services offered.Explain why a proposed initiative presents a viable and beneficial economic opportunity for an organization.Competency 3: Justify the qualitative and quantitative information used to guide economic decision making to stakeholders and colleagues.Explain how relevant economic and environmental data support a proposed initiative.Competency 5: Produce clear, coherent, and professional written work, in accordance with Capella writing standards.Write concisely and directly using active voice.Support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant and credible evidence.