Week 3: Concept Analysis
Submit Assignment
Due Sunday by 11:59pm
Points 200
Submitting a file upload
PURPOSE
This assignment provides the opportunity for the student to complete an analysis of a concept found in the Nurse Practitioner role supported by a nursing theory using an identified process. The assignment fosters analytical thinking related to the selected concept as well as application within the profession.
Activity Learning Outcomes
Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to:
Demonstrate logical and creative thinking in the analysis and application of a theory to nursing practice. (CO 1)?
Analyze theories from nursing and relevant fields with respect to the components, relationship among the components, and the application to advanced nursing practice. (CO 4)
Due Date: Sun., 11:59pm MT
Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment. Quizzes and discussions are not considered assignments and are not part of the late assignment policy. N501 Week 3: Concept Analysis Paper
Total Points Possible: 200
REQUIREMENTS
Description of the Assignment?
This assignment presents a modified method for conducting a concept analysis of?ONE?concept that is important and useful to the nurse practitioner role.? The concept for this assignment must be supported by a published?nursing?theory. The selected concept is identified and then the elements of the analysis process are applied in order to synthesize knowledge for application as demonstrated through the creation of model, borderline, and contrary cases.? Theoretical applications of the concept are also discussed. Non-nursing theories may?NOT?be used. The paper concludes with a synthesis of the student’s new knowledge about the concept. The scholarly literature is incorporated throughout the analysis.??Only the elements identified in this assignment should be used for this concept analysis.??
Criteria for Content?
Introduction- The introduction substantively presents all the following elements:??
Identifies the role of concept analysis within theory development.?
Identifies the selected?nursing?concept.?
Identifies the?nursing?theory that addresses the selected concept.?
Names the sections of the paper.?
Scholarly support is required.?
Definition/Explanation of the selected nursing concept?
Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required).?
A substantive discussion of this section with support from nursing literature is required.?
Literature review?
A substantive discussion of?at least 6 (six)?scholarly nursing literature sources on the selected concept.
Themes, ideas, and/or facts about the concept found in the reviewed sources are presented in an organized fashion.?
Support from nursing literature is required.?
Please Note:?Primary research articles about the selected nursing concept are the most useful resource for the literature review.? N501 Week 3: Concept Analysis Paper
Defining attributes,?for this section:? A minimum of?THREE (3)?attributes are required.?
A substantive discussion of this section with support from nursing literature is required. Explanation:? An attribute identifies characteristics of a concept. ?For this situation, the characteristics of the selected nursing concept are identified and discussed.?
Antecedent and Consequence?
1 antecedent?of the selected nursing concept.?
1 consequence?of the selected nursing concept.?
A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.?Explanation:?An antecedent is an identifiable occurrence that precedes an event.? In this situation, an antecedent precedes a selected nursing concept. A consequence follows or is the result of an event. In this situation, a consequence follows or is the result of the selected nursing concept.??
Empirical Referents?
Two (2)?empirical referents of the selected nursing concept.?
A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.? Explanation: An empirical referent is an objective ways to measure or determine the presence of the selected nursing concept.?
Construct Cases?
Explanation:?Hypothetical or real-life situations demonstrating the use or absence of the concept.?This section requires the creation of a model case, borderline case, and contrary case. Construct cases should be from the viewpoint of an advanced practice NP.
1 Model Case?is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas:?
Definition
All identified attributes. Explanation:??A model case is an example of a hypothetical or real-life situation that demonstrates all of the attributes noted previously in this assignment.?
Borderline Case?is created by the student in which one or two of the previously identified attributes are missing.?
1 Contrary Case?is created by the student that demonstrates the opposite of the selected nursing concepts. All identified attributes of the concept are absent in this?case. Explanation:? Borderline case is a created case where one or two of the previously identified attributes are missing. Contrary case is a created case that demonstrate the complete opposite of the selected nursing concept – all identified attributes are missing.?
Theoretical Applications of the Concept?
Discuss the purpose of a concept analysis in relationship to theory.?
Explain how the concept applies to the selected nursing theory.?
A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.?
Conclusion?
Summarization of key information regarding:?
Selected nursing concept.?
Selected nursing theory.?
Application of concept analysis findings to advanced practice nursing, specifically as an NP.?
The concluding statements include self-reflection on the new knowledge gained from conducting a concept analysis. (Self-reflection may be written in first-person.)?
??
Preparing the Assignment
Criteria for Format and Special Instructions
The paper (excluding the title page and reference page) should be at least 6, but no more than 8 pages. Points will be lost for not meeting these length requirements.
Title page, running head, body of paper, and reference page must follow APA guidelines as found in the 6th edition of the manual. This includes the use of headings for each section of the paper except for the introduction where no heading is used.
The source of the concept for this assignment must be a published nursing theory. Non-nursing theories may NOT be used. N501 Week 3: Concept Analysis Paper
A minimum of 6 (six) scholarly references must be used. Required textbooks for this course, and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information may NOT be used as scholarly references for this assignment. A dictionary maybe used as a reference for the section titled “Definition/Explanation of the selected nursing concept”, but it is NOT counted as one of the 6 required scholarly nursing references. Be aware that information from .com websites may be incorrect and should be avoided.
References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale is provided and the instructor has approved them.
Ideas and information from scholarly, peer reviewed, nursing sources must be cited and referenced correctly.
Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed and consistent with formal, scientific writing.
PLEASE note: Do not rely on .com sites to identify the nursing theory as they do not provide accurate information in all cases.
Possible Concepts: The following concepts are not required; students may select one of these concepts or find another concept. Each selected concept must be associated with a nursing theory; the use of non-nursing theories is NOT allowed. If you have any questions regarding your concept or the nursing theory, please consult with your faculty member for assistance. Please note: the concepts of incivility and civility are not allowed for this assignment.
| Adaptation
Burnout
Caring
Comfort
Compassion
Compassion fatigue |
Competence
Cultural humility
Empowerment
Engagement
Health
Leadership |
Meaningfulness
Modeling
Noise
Pain
Palliative care |
Quality of life
Resilience
Self-care
Sensory overload
Situational awareness |
| ASSIGNMENT CONTENT |
| Category |
Points |
% |
Description |
| Introduction |
8 |
4 |
The introduction substantively presents all the following elements:
Identifies the role of concept analysis within theory development.
Identifies the selected nursing concept.
Identifies the nursing theory that addresses the selected concept.
Names the sections of the paper.
Scholarly support is required. |
| Definition/Explanation of Selected Concept |
20 |
10 |
This section includes:
Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required).
A substantive discussion of this section with support from nursing literature is required. |
| Literature Review |
28 |
14 |
This section requires:
A substantive discussion of at least 6 (six) scholarly nursing literature sources on the selected concept.
Themes, ideas, and/or facts about the concept found in the reviewed sources are presented in an organized fashion.
Support from nursing literature is required. |
| Defining Attributes |
20 |
10 |
For this section:
A minimum of THREE (3) attributes are required.
A substantive discussion of this section with support from nursing literature is required |
| Antecedent & Consequence |
20 |
10 |
This section requires the identification of:
1 antecedent of the selected nursing concept.
1 consequence of the selected nursing concept.
A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required. |
| Empirical Referents |
16 |
8 |
This section requires the identification of:
2 (two) empirical referents of the selected nursing concept.
A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required. |
| Construct Cases |
24 |
12 |
This section requires:
1 Model Case is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas: N501 Week 3: Concept Analysis Paper
Definition
All identified attributes
NP perspective
1 Borderline Case is created by the student in which one or two of the previously identified attributes are missing.
1 Contrary Case is created by the student that demonstrates the opposite of the selected nursing concepts. All identified attributes of the concept are absent in this case. |
| Theoretical Applications of the Concept |
24 |
12 |
This section requires:
Discussion of the purpose of a concept analysis in relationship to theory.
Explanation on how the concept applies to the selected nursing theory.
A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required. |
| Conclusion
|
8 |
4 |
This section requires:
Summarization of key information regarding:
Selected nursing concept.
Selected nursing theory.
Application of concept analysis findings to advanced practice nursing specifically as an NP
The concluding statements include self-reflection on the new knowledge gained from conducting a concept analysis. (Self-reflection may be written in first-person.) |
| |
168 |
84% |
Total CONTENT Points= 168 pts |
| ASSIGNMENT FORMAT |
| Category |
Points |
% |
Description |
| Paper Specifications |
16 |
8 |
A nursing theory was used.
The source of the concept for this assignment was a published nursing theory. Non-nursing theories may NOT be used.
Paper meets length requirements of 6 to 8 pages.
Minimum of 6 scholarly nursing references.
A dictionary (except for Definition section), required textbooks for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, may NOT be used as scholarly references for this assignment.
References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale is provided and the instructor has approved them. |
| APA Format (6th edition) |
8 |
4 |
Title page, running head, body of paper, and reference page must follow APA guidelines as found in the 6th edition of the manual. This includes the use of headings for each section of the paper except for the introduction where no heading is used.
One deduction for each type of APA style error |
| Citations in Text |
4 |
2 |
Ideas and information that come from readings must be cited and referenced correctly. |
| Writing Mechanics |
4 |
2 |
Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed and consistent with formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual. |
| |
32 |
16% |
Total FORMAT Points= 32 pts |
| |
|
|
ASSIGNMENT TOTAL= 200 points |
156921834009/22/201911:59pm
File Upload
Google Doc
Tutoring
Top of Form
| Upload a file, or choose a file you’ve already uploaded. |
| File: |
remove empty attachment
Add Another File
remove empty attachment |
|
Click here to find a file you’ve already uploaded |
| |
| I agree to the tool’s End-User License Agreement.Links to an external site.
This assignment submission is my own, original work |
| CancelSubmit Assignment |
| Submitting… |
Bottom of Form
Before you can submit assignments directly from Google Drive you need to authorize Canvas to access your Google Drive account:
Authorize Google Drive Access
Rubric
true
722511
Can’t change a rubric once you’ve started using it.
Find a Rubric
Title: Find Rubric
NR501NP WK3 Concept Analysis_SEPT19
You’ve already rated students with this rubric. Any major changes could affect their assessment results.
| NR501NP WK3 Concept Analysis_SEPT19 |
| Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
| Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction _9597
1. Identifies the role of concept analysis within theory development.
2. Identifies the selected nursing concept.
3. Identifies the nursing theory from which the selected concept was obtained.
4. A nursing theory was used.
5. Identifies the sections of the paper.
6. Scholarly support from nursing literature was provided.
view longer description1. Identifies the role of concept analysis within theory development.<br/> 2. Identifies the selected nursing concept.<br/> 3. Identifies the nursing theory from which the selected concept was obtained. <br/> 4. A nursing theory was used.<br/> 5. Identifies the sections of the paper.<br/> 6. Scholarly support from nursing literature was provided.
Range
threshold: pts |
| Edit ratingDelete rating
8.0 to >7.0 pts
Excellent
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the required elements.
blank |
Edit ratingDelete rating
7.0 to >6.0 pts
V. Good
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the required elements.
_8312 |
Edit ratingDelete rating
6.0 to >4.0 pts
Satisfactory
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the required elements.
_9676 |
Edit ratingDelete rating
4.0 to >0.0 pts
Needs Improvement
Presentation of information in one or two of the required elements fails to meet expectations.
_2605 |
Edit ratingDelete rating
0.0 to >0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the required elements.
blank_2 |
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion. |
pts
/ 8.0 pts
—
|
| Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDefinition/ Explanation of Selected Concept _1705
1. Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required).
2. Provides support from scholarly sources.
view longer description1. Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required).<br/> 2. Provides support from scholarly sources.
Range
threshold: pts |
| Edit ratingDelete rating
20.0 to >18.0 pts
Excellent
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the required elements.
_8229 |
Edit ratingDelete rating
18.0 to >17.0 pts
V. Good
Presentation of information was good, but was Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the required elements.
_993 |
Edit ratingDelete rating
17.0 to >10.0 pts
Satisfactory
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the required elements.
_5179 |
Edit ratingDelete rating
10.0 to >0.0 pts
Needs Improvement
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the required elements. Presentation of information in one of the required elements fails to meet expectations.
_7665 |
Edit ratingDelete rating
0.0 to >0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in each of the required elements.
_7087 |
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion. |
pts
/ 20.0 pts
—
|
| Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLiterature Review _6305
1. A substantive discussion of at least 6 (six) nursing literature sources on the selected concept.
2. Themes, ideas, and/or facts about the concept found in the reviewed sources are presented in an organized fashion.
view longer description1. A substantive discussion of at least 6 (six) nursing literature sources on the selected concept.<br/> 2. Themes, ideas, and/or facts about the concept found in the reviewed sources are presented in an organized fashion.
Range
threshold: pts |
| Edit ratingDelete rating
28.0 to >25.0 pts
Excellent
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the required elements.
_6680 |
Edit ratingDelete rating
25.0 to >23.0 pts
V. Good
Presentation of information was good but was superficial in places and included all of the required elements.
_9686 |
Edit ratingDelete rating
23.0 to >14.0 pts
Satisfactory
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the required elements. Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the required elements.
_7948 |
Edit ratingDelete rating
14.0 to >0.0 pts
Needs Improvement
Presentation of information in one of the required elements fails to meet expectations.
_1977 |
Edit ratingDelete rating
0.0 to >0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in each of the required elements.
_5082 |
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion. |
pts
/ 28.0 pts
—
|
| Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDefining Attributes _7563
1. A minimum of 3 (three) attributes
2. Support from scholarly sources provided.
view longer description1. A minimum of 3 (three) attributes<br/> 2. Support from scholarly sources provided.
Range
threshold: pts |
| Edit ratingDelete rating
20.0 to >18.0 pts
Excellent
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all the required elements.
_2784 |
Edit ratingDelete rating
18.0 to >17.0 pts
V. Good
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the required elements.
_9036 |
Edit ratingDelete rating
17.0 to >10.0 pts
Satisfactory
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the required elements.
_294 |
Edit ratingDelete rating
10.0 to >0.0 pts
Needs Improvement
Presentation of information in one of the required elements fails to meet expectations.
_8721 |
Edit ratingDelete rating
0.0 to >0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in each of the required elements.
_6464 |
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion. |
pts
/ 20.0 pts
—
|
| Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAntecedent & Consequence _454
1. 1 antecedent of the selected nursing concept.
2. 1 consequence of the selected nursing concept.
3. Support from scholarly nursing literature provided.
view longer description1. 1 antecedent of the selected nursing concept. <br/> 2. 1 consequence of the selected nursing concept.<br/> 3. Support from scholarly nursing literature provided.
Range
threshold: pts |
| Edit ratingDelete rating
20.0 to >18.0 pts
Excellent
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the required elements.
_3953 |
Edit ratingDelete rating
18.0 to >17.0 pts
V. Good
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the required elements.
_3406 |
Edit ratingDelete rating
17.0 to >10.0 pts
Satisfactory
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the required elements.
_9980 |
Edit ratingDelete rating
10.0 to >0.0 pts
Needs Improvement
Presentation of information in one of the required elements fails to meet expectations.
_7214 |
Edit ratingDelete rating
0.0 to >0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two or more of the required elements.
_6674 |
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion. |
pts
/ 20.0 pts
—
|
| Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEmpirical Referents _2837
1. 2(two) empirical referents of the selected nursing concept.
2. Limited or no support from scholarly nursing literature was provided.
view longer description1. 2(two) empirical referents of the selected nursing concept.<br/> 2. Limited or no support from scholarly nursing literature was provided.
Range
threshold: pts |
| Edit ratingDelete rating
16.0 to >15.0 pts
Excellent
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the required elements.
_8607 |
Edit ratingDelete rating
15.0 to >13.0 pts
V. Good
Presentation of information was good but was superficial in places and included all of the required elements.
_3649 |
Edit ratingDelete rating
13.0 to >8.0 pts
Satisfactory
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the required elements.
_6085 |
Edit ratingDelete rating
8.0 to >0.0 pts
Needs Improvement
Presentation of information in one of the required elements fails to meet expectations.
_945 |
Edit ratingDelete rating
0.0 to >0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in each of the required elements.
_5937 |
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion. |
pts
/ 16.0 pts
—
|
| Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConstruct Cases _4515
1. 1 Model Case is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas:
• Definition
• All identified attributes
2. 1 Borderline Case is created by the student in which one or two of the previously identified attributes are missing.
3. 1 Contrary Case is created by the student that demonstrates the opposite of the selected nursing concepts. All identified attributes of the concept are absent in this case. N501 Week 3: Concept Analysis Paper
view longer description1. 1 Model Case is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas:<br/> • Definition<br/> • All identified attributes<br/> 2. 1 Borderline Case is created by the student in which one or two of the previously identified attributes are missing.<br/> 3. 1 Contrary Case is created by the student that demonstrates the opposite of the selected nursing concepts. All identified attributes of the concept are absent in this case.
Range
threshold: pts |
| Edit ratingDelete rating
24.0 to >22.0 pts
Excellent
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the required elements.
_7999 |
Edit ratingDelete rating
22.0 to >20.0 pts
V. Good
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the required elements.
_748 |
Edit ratingDelete rating
20.0 to >12.0 pts
Satisfactory
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the required elements.
_2083 |
Edit ratingDelete rating
12.0 to >0.0 pts
Needs Improvement
Presentation of information in one of the required elements fails to meet expectations.
_6166 |
Edit ratingDelete rating
0.0 to >0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two or more of the required elements.
_7279 |
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion. |
pts
/ 24.0 pts
—
|
| Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTheoretical Applications of the Concept _2725
1. Discusses the purpose of a concept analysis in relationship to theory.
2. Explains how the concept applies to the selected nursing theory.
3. A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.
view longer description1. Discusses the purpose of a concept analysis in relationship to theory.<br/> 2. Explains how the concept applies to the selected nursing theory.<br/> 3. A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.
Range
threshold: pts |
| Edit ratingDelete rating
24.0 to >22.0 pts
Excellent
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the required elements.
_6374 |
Edit ratingDelete rating
22.0 to >20.0 pts
V. Good
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the required elements.
_4162 |
Edit ratingDelete rating
20.0 to >12.0 pts
Satisfactory
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the required elements.
_6014 |
Edit ratingDelete rating
12.0 to >0.0 pts
Needs Improvement
Presentation of information in one of the required elements fails to meet expectations.
_5054 |
Edit ratingDelete rating
0.0 to >0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two or more of the required elements.
_52 |
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion. |
pts
/ 24.0 pts
—
|
| Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion 167344_4763
1. Summarizes information on selected nursing concept.
2. Summarizes information on selected nursing theory.
3. Summarizes the application of concept analysis findings to advanced nursing practice.
4. Self-reflection on the new knowledge gained regarding concept analysis.
view longer description1. Summarizes information on selected nursing concept.<br/> 2. Summarizes information on selected nursing theory.<br/> 3. Summarizes the application of concept analysis findings to advanced nursing practice.<br/> 4. Self-reflection on the new knowledge gained regarding concept analysis.
Range
threshold: pts |
| Edit ratingDelete rating
8.0 to >7.0 pts
Excellent
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the required elements.
167344_7786 |
Edit ratingDelete rating
7.0 to >6.0 pts
V. Good
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the required elements.
167344_4463 |
Edit ratingDelete rating
6.0 to >4.0 pts
Satisfactory
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the required elements.
167344_5080 |
Edit ratingDelete rating
4.0 to >0.0 pts
Needs Improvement
Presentation of information in one or two of the required elements fails to meet expectations.
167344_5707 |
Edit ratingDelete rating
0.0 to >0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the required elements.
167344_4069 |
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion. |
pts
/ 8.0 pts
—
|
| Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePaper Specifications 167344_9093
1. A nursing theory was used.
2. The source of the concept for this assignment was a published nursing theory.
3. Paper meet length requirements of 6 to 8 page.
4. Minimum of 6 scholarly nursing references
5. A dictionary (except for Definition section), required textbooks for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were NOT used as scholarly references.
6. References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them.
view longer description1. A nursing theory was used.<br/> 2. The source of the concept for this assignment was a published nursing theory. <br/> 3. Paper meet length requirements of 6 to 8 page.<br/> 4. Minimum of 6 scholarly nursing references<br/> 5. A dictionary (except for Definition section), required textbooks for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were NOT used as scholarly references.<br/> 6. References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them.
Range
threshold: pts |
| Edit ratingDelete rating
16.0 to >15.0 pts
Excellent
This section included all of the required elements.
167344_4202 |
Edit ratingDelete rating
15.0 to >13.0 pts
V. Good
This section included three of the required elements.
167344_8175 |
Edit ratingDelete rating
13.0 to >8.0 pts
Satisfactory
This section included only two of the required elements.
167344_6545 |
Edit ratingDelete rating
8.0 to >0.0 pts
Needs Improvement
This section included only one of the required elements.
167344_3696 |
Edit ratingDelete rating
0.0 to >0 pts
Unsatisfactory
This section included none of the required elements.
167344_1436 |
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion. |
pts
/ 16.0 pts
—
|
| Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Style 167344_9606
APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the:
• title page,
• running head,
• body of paper (including citations and headings), and
• reference page
One deduction for each type of APA format error
view longer descriptionAPA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the: <br/> • title page,<br/> • running head,<br/> • body of paper (including citations and headings), and<br/> • reference page <br/> One deduction for each type of APA format error
Range
threshold: pts |
| Edit ratingDelete rating
8.0 to >7.0 pts
Excellent
0 to 1 APA error present.
167344_520 |
Edit ratingDelete rating
7.0 to >6.0 pts
V. Good
2-3 APA errors were present.
167344_8147 |
Edit ratingDelete rating
6.0 to >4.0 pts
Satisfactory
4–5 APA were are present.
167344_6558 |
Edit ratingDelete rating
4.0 to >0.0 pts
Needs Improvement
6–7 APA were are present.
167344_8274 |
Edit ratingDelete rating
0.0 to >0 pts
Unsatisfactory
8 or greater APA errors were present.
167344_5542 |
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion. |
pts
/ 8.0 pts
—
|
| Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCitations 167344_3370
view longer description
Range
threshold: pts |
| Edit ratingDelete rating
4.0 to >3.0 pts
Excellent
1. There were 0-1 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge 2. Permission to use references older than 5 years was obtained from faculty.
167344_5558 |
Edit ratingDelete rating
3.0 to >2.0 pts
V. Good
1. There were 2-3 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge 2. Permission to use references older than 5 years was NOT obtained from faculty.
167344_3348 |
Edit ratingDelete rating
2.0 to >1.0 pts
Satisfactory
There were 4-5 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge.
167344_3632 |
Edit ratingDelete rating
1.0 to >0.0 pts
Needs Improvement
There were 6-7 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge.
167344_4126 |
Edit ratingDelete rating
0.0 to >0 pts
Unsatisfactory
There were 8 or greater errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge.
167344_4004 |
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion. |
pts
/ 4.0 pts
—
|
| Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Quality 167344_2580
Grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual.
view longer descriptionGrammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual.
Range
threshold: pts |
| Edit ratingDelete rating
4.0 to >3.0 pts
Excellent
1–2 errors.
167344_5144 |
Edit ratingDelete rating
3.0 to >2.0 pts
V. Good
3 – 4 errors.
167344_1393 |
Edit ratingDelete rating
2.0 to >1.0 pts
Satisfactory
5 – 6 errors.
167344_5086 |
Edit ratingDelete rating
1.0 to >0.0 pts
Needs Improvement
7 – 8 errors.
167344_3900 |
Edit ratingDelete rating
0.0 to >0 pts
Unsatisfactory
9 or greater errors.
167344_3809 |
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion. |
pts
/ 4.0 pts
—
|
| Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate penalty deductions 167344_1893
Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment.
view longer descriptionStudents are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment. N501 Week 3: Concept Analysis Paper
Range
threshold: pts |
| Edit ratingDelete rating
0.0 to >0.0 pts
Manual Deductions
167344_2052 |
Edit ratingDelete rating
0.0 to >0 pts
Manual Deductions
167344_5872 |
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion. |
pts
/ 0.0 pts
—
|
| Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescription of criterion
view longer description
Range
threshold: 5 pts |
| Edit ratingDelete rating
5to >0 pts
Full Marks
blank |
Edit ratingDelete rating
0to >0 pts
No Marks
blank_2 |
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion. |
pts
/ 5 pts
—
|
| Total Points: 200. |
