BU220 Herzing Week 2 HIPAA Education Assignment

/in /by

BU220 Herzing Week 2 HIPAA Education Assignment

BU220 Herzing Week 2 HIPAA Education Assignment

Instructions:

As a health care professional, you may be placed in a position where you will be asked to disclose patient information to law enforcement or a government agency. As a manager, you must also educate your staff to handle these situations with professionalism and confidence.

ORDER  A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER  NOW

 

Create an infographic using www.Piktochart.com, or a similar program.

  • Your audience is employees within your department.
  • Your goal is to educate your staff to understand what is allowable, and what is not when requests for patient information are made by law enforcement or government agency officials.
  • Your infographic should represent the flow of an interaction between an employee and an official, including text and graphic representations of your key points.
  • Save your completed infographic as either a .jpg or .png, and ensure all text is readable.
  • A minimum of three references should be listed at the bottom of your completed document.
  • Submit the infographic as a .jpg file.

Estimated time to complete: 3 hours

Rubric

HC310 Unit 2 Assignment 2 – HIPAA Education

HC310 Unit 2 Assignment 2 – HIPAA Education 
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
20.0 ptsLevel 5 

Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors.

 18.0 ptsLevel 4 

Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed.

 16.0 ptsLevel 3 

Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial.

 14.0 ptsLevel 2 

Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors.

 12.0 ptsLevel 1 

Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual factors but does not provide a defined statement.

 0.0 ptsLevel 0 

There is no evidence of a defined statement.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis
20.0 ptsLevel 5 

Organizes and compares evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

 18.0 ptsLevel 4 

Organizes and interprets evidence to reveal patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

 16.0 ptsLevel 3 

Organizes and describes evidence according to patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

 14.0 ptsLevel 2 

Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing patterns, differences, or similarities.

 12.0 ptsLevel 1 

Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.

 0.0 ptsLevel 0 

Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting
5.0 ptsLevel 5 

The paper exhibits an excellent command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.

 4.5 ptsLevel 4 

The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.

 4.0 ptsLevel 3 

The paper exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.

 3.5 ptsLevel 2 

The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.

 3.0 ptsLevel 1 

The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.

 0.0 ptsLevel 0 

The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty in discerning the meaning.
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA
5.0 ptsLevel 5 

The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.

 4.5 ptsLevel 4 

The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

 4.0 ptsLevel 3 

The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

 3.5 ptsLevel 2 

The required APA elements are not all included and/or there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

 3.0 ptsLevel 1 

Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate a limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.

 0.0 ptsLevel 0 

There is little to no evidence of APA formatting and/or there are no in-text citations and/or references.