NUR 514 Grand Canyon University Week 2 Leadership Style Reflective Essay

NUR 514 Grand Canyon University Week 2 Leadership Style Reflective Essay

Leadership Style Reflective Essay

Self-Assessments and Results

 

In this self-assessment tool, I chose the three areas of focus that I believe are the most important to me. I assessed my personality, emotions and learning style.  I will admit I experienced mixed feelings regarding the results. I was surprised and in agreeance with the results. The first assessed my personality. I fell in the category of having a defender personality. Defenders are often found in the line of work involving medicine, academics and charitable social work. Some strengths of the defender are  supportive, reliable, observant, loyal, hardworking, etc. Areas that need improvement are repress feelings, overload themselves, too altruistic. I was very shocked reading the result of altruistic. I had no idea I was displaying this trait upon others. The personality test also showed that I was 71% inverted. I truthfully and honestly can agree with this result. I have always enjoyed being in my own space. The next self-assessment was the learning style. I scored a 12 is kinesthetic, eight in visual learners, six in reading/writing and five for auditory. I was not surprised by these results, I have always been a hands-on learner or one that learns by trial and error, rather than reading directions. The last assessment I took was the emotional assessment. I scored a 102% for my IQ, which is pretty average. This score put me in the 58th percentile. My strengths are contentment, valued integrity, social insight. Areas of improvement are flexibility, failure to recognize feelings of others and own feelings. I was extremely shocked at the result of failure to recognize other people feelings. I myself thought I was pretty good at recognizing people feelings but I guess not. All three assessments were eye openers. These assessments helped me to better understand how I am perceived and how I perceive others. NUR 514 Grand Canyon University Week 2 Leadership Style Reflective Essay

ORDER  A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER  NOW

Leadership Styles

The leadership style that mostly aligns to my philosophy of care is servant leadership along with transformation leadership. A servant leader focuses more on the needs of others rather than self. For the servant leader, this is about being committed to the personal and professional development of the staff team. This requires a time commitment, but that time creates the adhesion which starts to pull the individuals within the group together as a community (Ellis, 2019, p.77). The servant leader is committed and devoted to its team members. This leadership aligns with my philosophy of care because I am all about devoting myself to my job and making sure they have what they need to function properly. What is appealing about this leadership is it would allow me to get to know my staff and team members and help them to realized my commitment to them and the job. It would promote a positive outcome for everyone  I also will be incorporating transformational leadership as well. Transformational leadership is about inspiring staff and team members to share visions and goals. What appeals me about this leadership is in order for an organization to excel and deliver quality care, all parties involved have to be willing to go that extra mile in their job duties to have the positive outcome. In addition, leaders who experience positive affect will be more adept at using emotion to impart their vision to their followers (Carleton, Barling,& Trivisonno,2018, p.187). NUR 514 Grand Canyon University Week 2 Leadership Style Reflective Essay.  This leadership style is appealing to me as well because all shared visions ang goal can become reality. If all can believe it, we can achieve it. Both these leadership styles go hand in hand not just with my philosophy of care but with my personal worldview of the deliverance of care.  As APRN’s we need to continue to put our patients needs first and stay focused on delivering quality effective care.

Incorporation of leadership style

The characteristics I have to display servant leadership style will be being a good listener, be honest, showing empathy and commitment to the growth of my team members. As an APRN, I want all staff to know that I have an open door policy and I will always listen to their concerns and act accordingly. The servant leadership style is believed to help all team members to be the best at their job. I will meet with all team members to discuss goals or any issues. I also will meet with individuals privately if they wish to speak in private. I would ask my patients to fill out surveys on what they like most and what they dislike( need feedback quote). Any feedback is good feedback. The feedback would help me better serve my patients. I would want to know from my staff is it anything I can do to help us to succeed in patient care. To display transformational leadership I will remain trustworthy, motivate team members, focus on the vision to improve patient outcome and provide positive and negative feedback to team members. When negative feedback is provided, I do not want my team to feel they are being torn down, it will be a learning moment.

Areas of improvement

The self assessments that I took had some surprising results. The results displayed that I need to be more positive, reluctant to change, too altruistic and overload myself. These areas were the biggest pointer to me that needs improvement. Improving them would benefit my team members and myself as a leader.

 

 

References

Carleton, E. L., Barling, J., & Trivisonno, M. (2018). Leaders’ trait mindfulness and transformational leadership: The mediating roles of leaders’ positive affect and leadership self-efficacy. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue Canadienne Des Sciences Du Comportement50(3), 185–194. https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.1037/cbs0000103

ELLIS, P. (2019). What it means to be a servant leader. Wounds UK15(5), 76–77. NUR 514 Grand Canyon University Week 2 Leadership Style Reflective Essay

 

 

 

HLT 205 Assignment Outpatient vs. Hospital Presentation

HLT 205 Assignment Outpatient vs. Hospital Presentation

 

In this this assignment you will be comparing outpatient services to those offered by hospitals. As medical professionals we need to understand the roles of each and how they differ.

Create a PowerPoint presentation that addresses the following:

Compare the roles of outpatient services and hospitals related to their place within the health care delivery system. How are they similar? How are they different?

How have the roles of outpatient services and hospitals evolved from historical times to the present?

Identify three functions shared by both outpatient services and hospitals. How do outpatient services and hospitals differ in their approach to these functions? How are they similar? HLT 205 Assignment Outpatient vs. Hospital Presentation

ORDER  A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER  NOW

 

Which type of health provider (outpatient services or hospitals) has been most effective in caring for underserved populations? Explain your reasoning.

Are the financial challenges faced by hospitals different from those of outpatient services? How are they similar?

Your presentation must have 10-12 slides and cite a minimum of two references other than your textbook.

While GCU style format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using GCU documentation guidelines, which can be found in the GCU Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. HLT 205 Assignment Outpatient vs. Hospital Presentation

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

What is an inpatient? In the most basic sense, this term refers to someone admitted to the hospital to stay overnight, whether briefly or for an extended period of time. Physicians keep these patients at the hospital to monitor them more closely.

With this in mind, what is outpatient care? Also called ambulatory care, this term defines any service or treatment that doesn’t require hospitalization. An annual exam with your primary care physician is an example of outpatient care, but so are emergent cases where the patient leaves the emergency department the same day they arrive. Any appointment at a clinic or specialty facility outside the hospital is considered outpatient care as well.

While there’s a clear difference between an inpatient and an outpatient, there is a little bit of gray area as well. Occasionally, physicians will assign a patient observation status while they determine whether hospitalization is required. This period typically lasts for no more than 24 hours.

Also note that the location itself doesn’t define whether you’re an inpatient versus outpatient. It’s the duration of stay, not the type of establishment, that determines your status. HLT 205 Assignment Outpatient vs. Hospital Presentation

NUR 514 Topic 6 Discussion Question one

NUR 514 Topic 6 Discussion Question one

Topic 6 DQ 1

Description:

In what ways can informatics help health care providers overcome current or emerging barriers to care and increase access to safe, quality health care? Include a discussion of the value and challenges of clinical provider order entry (CPOE) and clinical decision support systems (CDSS) in providing safe patient care in your response. Why are heuristic principles (human factors/usability/user centered design) important for efficient clinical information systems such as CPOE and CDSS? NUR 514 Topic 6 Discussion Question one

ORDER  A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER  NOW

Description

Objectives:

1. Analyze the role of health information technology and informatics in improving access to care and promoting patient safety and quality.
2. Analyze the critical role of health information and technology standards and interoperability in improving access to care and the exchange of health information.
3. Discuss best practice for implementing informatics technologies that impact advanced practice nursing and the delivery of care, including clinical provider order entry (CPOE) and clinical decision support systems (CDSS).
4. Evaluate the role of workflow analysis, human factors, and user-centered design concepts in developing health information technologies.

Advanced Practice Nursing: Essential Knowledge for the Profession

Description:

Read Chapters 12-14 in Advanced Practice Nursing: Essential Knowledge for the Profession. NUR 514 Topic 6 Discussion Question one

Nursing Informatics and the Foundation of Knowledge

 

Description:

Read Chapters 2, 9-11, and 13 in Nursing Informatics and the Foundation of Knowledge.

EMR vs EHR – What Is the Difference?

Description:

Read “EMR vs EHR – What Is the Difference?” by Garrett and Seidman (2011), located on the Health IT Buzz website.

What’s the Difference Between Health Informatics and Health Information Management?

Description:

Read “What’s the Difference Between Health Informatics and Health Information Management?” by the College of St. Scholastica (2019), located on the college’s website.

Quality Measures

Description:

Read “Quality Measures,” located on the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) website (2016).

Writing an Issue Brief

Description:

Read “Writing an Issue Brief,” located on the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy (AACP) website (2016). This resource will help you complete the Topic 6 assignment.

ORDER  A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER  NOW

The Mechanics of Writing a Policy Brief

Description:

Read “The Mechanics of Writing a Policy Brief,” by DeMarco and Tufts, from Nursing Outlook (2014). This resource will help you complete your Topic 6 assignment.

A Usability Study to Improve a Clinical Decision Support System for the Prescription of Antibiotic Drugs
Description:

Read “A Usability Study to Improve a Clinical Decision Support System for the Prescription of Antibiotic Drugs,” by Akloufi, Verhaegh, Jaspers, Melles, van der Sijs, and Verbon, from PLOS ONE (2019). NUR 514 Topic 6 Discussion Question one

American Health Information Management Association (AHIMA)

Description:

Explore the American Health Information Management Association (AHIMA) website.

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

Description:

Explore the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) website.

American College of Nurse-Midwives Library

Description:

Explore the issue briefs available on the ACNM Library page of the American College of Nurse-Midwives (ACNM) website. This resource will help you complete your Topic 6 assignment. NUR 514 Topic 6 Discussion Question one

NUR 590 Topic 1 Discussion Question 2

NUR 590 Topic 1 Discussion Question 2

Explain the importance of a “spirit of inquiry” in an evidence-based culture and what you can do as an advanced registered nurse to encourage this within your practice or organization. In response to your peers, compare the role and implementation of EBP in your specialty area with another advanced registered nurse specialty.

ORDER  A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER  NOW

Science teaches us to explore and question. In medicine, it the same. There is always something to explore in medicine, whether its to improve upon interventions or to learn complex diseases. NUR 590 Topic 1 Discussion Question 2. Throughout my career as a nurse and nursing student, it was always expressed to me that in order for me to become a successful nurse I would need to engage in continuing education for the life of my career. In life, we should always strive for continuing education for personal development and growth. The future of nursing will require nurses to question, explore and take initiative making decisions on patient care, interventions, in leadership and public health. “Explain the importance of a spirit of inquiry in an evidence-based culture and what you can do as an advanced registered nurse to encourage this within your practice or organization. In response to your peers, compare the role and implementation of EBP in your specialty area with another advanced registered nurse specialty” (National League of Nursing, 2014, para. 1). The COVID-19 pandemic was a wake up call in that we as a nation need to focus on improving our nursing practice. Nurses will need to be encourage and pushed into leadership roles, executive positions and in the areas a research and development. Many nurses took the lead in saving their patients and hospitals as the pandemic ravaged hospitals throughout the country. There was also a spike in people researching how to get into the field of medicine (particularly in nursing and nursing research). There became a fascination into epidemiology, public health and medical research as people and nurses became curious about vaccine development and how outbreaks of disease and virus happen. As a advanced registered I would encourage evidence based culture by being an example of someone who uses EBP and work in collaboration with other staffers to implement EBP research into the real world. During the heigh of the pandemic, EBP research was used to help patients as other interventions and methods failed. NUR 590 Topic 1 Discussion Question 2

Implementing EBP

 

In the field of advanced nursing practice, there are various ways advanced nurses implement EBPs. Nurse practitioners implement and EBP “when she/he prescribes a treatment for a patient that is substantiated by scientific research; Often, nurse practitioners look for an experimental study that compares the efficacy of a treatment with an untreated control group” (Nurse Practitioner Schools, 2021).

 

Certified mid-wifery

 

For nursing midwives, EBP is are used to enhance the lives of the mother, child and community. Mothers are the backbone of communities and the health and safety of woman determines the health and safety of their respective communities. Areas of challenges are identified and EBP are used to improve the lives of women in order to safely carry, deliver and raise children.

 

References:

National League of Nursing. (2014). Practical/Vocational Nursing Program Outcome: Spirit of Inquiry. https://www.nln.org/docs/default-source/default-document-library/spirit-of-inquiry-final.pdf?sfvrsn=0

 

Nurse Practitioner Schools. (2021). Guide to Evidence-Based Nursing Practice for NPs. Retrieved from https://www.nursepractitionerschools.com/resources/guide-to-evidence-based-nursing-practice/

Spirit of inquiry is defined as a continuous sense of wonder that guides both learning and practices. Nurses can be highly influenced by the spirit of inquiry practices in a beneficial way. In nursing, the spirit of inquiry will raise questions, challenge established and existing practices, and look for new ways to solve problems. When asking the right questions in the right way, obtaining the best available evidence, and determining what practice changes are needed are all part of addressing a clinical problem through evidence-based practice (EBP) (National League for Nursing, 2021). Developing nurses with an inquiry mindset within a culture that promotes a systematic approach to asking clinical questions is a critical component of the EBP journey.

When conducting an evidence-based study or question, utilizing the spirit of inquiry supports the ongoing curiosity of evidence that would dictate a clinical decision. As a nurse, it is essential to understand if an intervention is necessary, beneficial for the client, and supported by evidence-based practice. Nurses and collaborative team members work to improve clinical problems by using clinical reasoning or judgment. The spirit of increased exit and the first step of the evidence-based process will begin. The overall outcome or goal in predictable patient care settings, nurses will use evidence, tradition, and patient preferences in collaboration with health care team members to promote optimal health status. NUR 590 Topic 1 Discussion Question 2

ORDER  A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER  NOW

National League for Nursing. (2021). Practical/Vocational Nursing Program Outcome: Spirit of Inquiryhttps://www.nln.org/docs/default-source/default-document-library/spirit-of-inquiry-final.pdf?sfvrsn=0#:~:text=Spirit%20of%20inquiry%20is%20a

Evidence-based practice for nursing is driven by the influence and motivation to seek more information that would support interventions and practice. The spirit of inquiry is the term given to this motivation as nurses continue to question current practices and knowledge for evidence-based practice. Without it, research would go stale and would not produce any change that could significantly increase positive outcomes in health care or practice. Evidence-based culture is dependent on those who nurses who seek to explore more possibility in practice, patient care and health knowledge so that health care not only constantly improving but also evolving to meet changes in health demands and technologies. Advanced registered nurses can encourage inquiry in their respective areas of practice where they feel that although there is good outcomes, better ones can be produced with a change in evidence-based practice. This would require extensive research which those advanced nurses must have the motivation to thoroughly examine through the evidence-based research process. Giving opportunity to make changes to how they practice and how it affects the patients will produce professional rewarding as well as personal ones too which is why nudging and leading other nurses to participate in change can greatly improve patient outcomes from interventions (Arzouman, 2015).

Nurse Informaticists utilize evidence-based communication and technology integration techniques so that patient care and information systems are beneficial to all parties involved. Utilization of nursing experience in order to enhance communication or health records can streamline patient care so that efficiency can reach maximum potential. Leadership is also important to nursing informatics and communication when implementing evidence-based practice interventions. Having knowledge of communication barriers and having implementing creativity in overcoming them provides valuable resources to patient care and health (Farokhzadian, Jouparineiad, Fatehi & Falahati-Marvast, 2021). NUR 590 Topic 1 Discussion Question 2

References:

Arzouman, J. (2015). Evidence-Based Practice: Share the Spirit of Inquiry. MEDSURG Nursing, 24(4), 209–211.

 

Farokhzadian, J., Jouparinejad, S., Fatehi, F., & Falahati-Marvast, F. (2021). Improving nurses’ readiness for evidence-based practice in critical care units: results of an information literacy training program. BMC Nursing, 20(1). https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00599-y

Having an evidence-based culture is important in nursing and having one that possesses a spirit of inquiry is even more important. Having a spirit of inquiry within an evidence-based culture helps to support a systematic process for asking clinical questions related to a clinical problem (Wyant, 2018). Spirit of inquiry is the beginning step in the evidence-based practice (EBP) process. This is where one has the curiosity of what the best evidence is to help guide one in clinical decision making for a problem that they are trying to address (Wyant, 2018). You know when a spirit of inquiry exists within a work culture when you have nurses collaborating on ways to improve clinical problems through using clinical reasoning and judgement (Wyant, 2018). To encourage a spirit of inquiry as an advanced registered nurse within my practice or organization is to model it. By leading and supporting this culture, will help to encourage others to trust each other and encourage the change process. By doing this, it will help get rid of the “it’s the way we have always done it mentality” and move towards the thinking of what does the evidence show when looking at clinical problems. This will help create a collaborative culture among a team and when the team starts seeing the benefits from it, it will be the go-to process when looking into changing clinical processes. It is important that leadership supports implementation research and practice so that it fosters a culture of collaboration and organizational climate for implementation science (Nelson-Brantley & Chipps, 2021).

References:

Nelson-Brantley, H. V., &. Chipps, E. (2021). Implementation science and nursing leadership: Improving the adoption and sustainability of evidence-based practice. The Journal of Nursing Administration, 51(5), 237-239. doi:10.1097/NNA.0000000000001006

Wyant, T. (2018, January 18). A spirit of inquiry leads to evidence-based answers to practice questions. ONS Voice. https://voice.ons.org/news-and-views/a-spirit-of-inquiry-leads-to-evidence-based-answers-to-practice-questions

Once a search is carried out to find relevant articles within a chosen topic, a literature review helps bring together what is already known about a topic, facilitating new learning opportunities (Watts, 2020). Gaps in current knowledge can be identified, or theories and academic opinions may raise new research areas during critical analyses. The initial question asked may evolve or change altogether when researching a posed question. Other themes or questions that may surface during the research journey, adding curiosity to what should be researched next. This “spirit of inquiry” is essential to our knowledge base and our peers well.

Nurse leaders have considerable influence on implementing evidence-based practice (EBP) in their departments, units, and organizations; however, resistance to change can stall innovations (Tucker & Mazurek Melnyk, 2019). Effective leadership requires an understanding of change theory, how change is facilitated and blocked, successful change steps, and strategies to promote each step. Implementation for promoting EPB falls into seven categories: leadership, coaching, communication, reinforcements, recognition, measurement, and reporting. Different strategies may be needed at each stage of change to promote and sustain the change. Nurse leaders can successfully implement EBP changes by being knowledgeable about a proposed change, partner with staff, engage the help of mentors or change agents, work with senior leaders, thank and celebrate all staff in the process, and disseminate findings. NUR 590 Topic 1 Discussion Question 2

DNP 810 Topic 3 Discussion Question Two

DNP 810 Topic 3 Discussion Question Two

Why is it important to have a comprehensive health and physical assessment that includes information on environment and genomic influences? How can the doctoral-prepared nurse apply this information in practice? Explain. Support your rationale with a minimum of two scholarly sources.

The etiologic paradigm of complex human disorders such as autism is that genetic and environmental risk factors are independent and additive, but the interactive effects at the epigenetic interface are largely ignored. Genomic technologies have radically changed perspective on the human genome and how the epigenetic interface may impact complex human disorders. DNP 810 Topic 3 Discussion Question Two. Here, I review recent

ORDER  A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER  NOW

genomic, environmental and epigenetic findings that suggest a new paradigm of “integrative genomics” in which genetic variation in genomic size may be impacted by dietary and environmental factors that influence the genomic saturation of DNA methylation. Human genomes are highly repetitive, but the interface of large-scale genomic differences with environmental factors that alter the DNA methylome such as dietary folate is under-explored.

In addition to obvious direct effects of some environmental toxins on the genome by causing chromosomal breaks, non-mutagenic toxin exposures correlate with DNA hypomethylation that can lead to rearrangements between repeats or increased retrotransposition. Since human neurodevelopment appears to be particularly sensitive to alterations in epigenetic pathways, a further focus will be on how developing neurons may be particularly impacted by even subtle alterations to DNA methylation and proposing new directions towards understanding the quixotic etiology of autism by integrative genomic approaches. DNP 810 Topic 3 Discussion Question Two

 

Environmental Toxins Negatively Impact Global DNA Methylation

The epigenetic modification of DNA methylation acts at the interface of genetic and environmental factors. As part of the emerging field of “environmental epigenetics,” a variety of environmental toxins with known adverse impacts on human health or neurodevelopment have been investigated for their potential effects on DNA methylation and other epigenetic effects (reviewed in ref. ). Arsenic, cadmium, benzene and air pollution are exposures associated with reduction of DNA methylation levels at LINE1 and/or Alu repeats in human tissues. In mouse models of human exposures, methylmercury resulted in hypermethylation of brain derived neurotropic factor (Bdnf) in hippocampus and diethylstilbestrol exposure reduced global methylation in the uterus. In a human Greenlandic Inuit population with high persistent organic pollutant (POP) levels, reduced global DNA methylation (LINE1) was observed with increased POP levels. Furthermore, prenatal exposure of a rat model with organochloride pesticides, methylmercury, POPs or a mixture of all three chemical classes showed that POPs in the mixture correlated with reduced DNA methylation levels in liver.

Within the class of POPs, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) are a widely distributed class of environmental pollutants previously used in industrial products until adverse health effects were recognized in the 1970s resulting in discontinued use. The developmental neurotoxicity of PCBs became devastatingly apparent after the large-scale consumption of PCB-contaminated rice oil that occurred in 1968 in Japan and in 1979 in Taiwan., PCBs are known to disrupt neurotransmitter systems, endocrine systems and intracellular signaling pathways., While PCB levels are gradually declining in the environment following the discontinued use, a related class of POPs, the polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), are currently used as commercial flame-retardants and are a growing concern for human exposures. Our recent analyses of perinatal PBDE exposure in a genetic mouse model susceptible to social behavioral deficits showed global hypomethylation in brain associated with adverse social and cognitive behavioral outcomes (Woods et al., in preparation).

The major future challenge that will be explored in this review is understanding how DNA methylation of human repetitive elements interacts with environmental risk and protective factors in the etiology of a complex genetic disorder such as autism. DNP 810 Topic 3 Discussion Question Two

NURS 6003 Discussion Examining Nursing Specialties

NURS 6003 Discussion Examining Nursing Specialties

You have probably seen one or more of the many inspirational posters about decisions. A visual such as a forked road or a street sign is typically pictured, along with a quote designed to inspire.

Decisions are often not so easily inspired. Perhaps you discovered this when choosing a specialty within the MSN program. This decision is a critical part of your plan for success, and you no doubt want to get it right. This is yet another area where your network can help, as well as other sources of information that can help you make an informed choice.

ORDER  A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER  NOW

Note: Unless otherwise noted, initial postings to Discussions are due on or before Day 3, and response postings are due on or before Day 6. You are required to participate in the Discussion on at least three different days (a different day for main post and each

response). It is important to adhere to the weekly time frame to allow others ample time to respond to your posting. In addition, you are expected to respond to questions directed toward your own initial posting in a timely manner. NURS 6003 Discussion Examining Nursing Specialties

To Prepare:

Reflect on your decision to pursue a specialty within the MSN program, including your professional and academic goals as they relate to your program/specialization.

By Day 3 of Week 10

Post an explanation of your choice of a nursing specialty within the program. Describe any difficulties you had (or are having) in making your choice, and the factors that drove/are driving your decision. Identify at least one professional organization affiliated with your chosen specialty and provide details on becoming a member.

By Day 6 of Week 10

Respond to at least two of your colleagues’ posts by sharing your thoughts on their specialty, supporting their choice or offering suggestions if they have yet to choose.

Submission and Grading Information

Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:

Week 10 Discussion Rubric

Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 10

To participate in this Discussion:

Week 10 Discussion

Rubric Detail

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.
Content
Name: NURS_6003_Module06_Week11_Assignment_Rubric

Grid View
List View

Excellent Good Fair Poor
Complete the following items and incorporate them into the final version of your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan:

 

 

  • Write a paragraph or make a Nursing Specialty Comparison table comparing at least two nursing specialties, including your selected specialization and second-preferred specialization.
  • Write a 2-3 paragraph justification statement identifying your reasons for choosing your MSN specialization. Incorporate feedback you received from colleagues in this week’s Discussion Forum.
  • Identify the professional organization related to the specialization you have chosen to focus on for this Assignment and explain how you can become an active member of this organization.
    Points Range: 77 (77%) – 85 (85%) NURS 6003 Discussion Examining Nursing Specialties
    A fully completed and detailed paragraph or comparison matrix table is provided that accurately and fully describes the selected and second-preferred specialization.

A clear and accurately justified statement describes in detail the reasons for choosing the MSN specialization with sufficient evidence of incorporating feedback from colleagues in this week’s Discussion Forum.

The response clearly identifies and accurately describes in detail the professional organization related to the specialization selected. The response clearly and accurately describes in detail how to become an active member of this organization.

Points Range: 68 (68%) – 76 (76%)
A partially completed paragraph or comparison matrix table is provided that partially describes the selected and second-preferred specialization.

ORDER  A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER  NOW

A partially justified statement describes the reasons for choosing the MSN specialization with some evidence of incorporating feedback from colleagues in this week’s Discussion Forum.

The response partially describes the professional organization related to the specialization selected. The response partially describes how to become an active member of this organization.

Points Range: 59 (59%) – 67 (67%)
A vague or inaccurately completed paragraph or comparison matrix table is provided describing the selected and second-preferred specialization.

A vague or inaccurately justified statement describes the reasons for choosing the MSN specialization with vague evidence of incorporating feedback from colleagues in this week’s Discussion Forum.

The response vaguely or inaccurately describes the professional organization related to the specialization selected. The response vaguely or inaccurately describes how to become an active member of this organization.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 58 (58%)
A vague and inaccurately completed paragraph or comparison matrix table is provided describing the selected and second-preferred specialization or is missing.

A vague and inaccurately justified statement describes the reasons for choosing the MSN specialization with vague and inaccurate evidence of incorporating feedback from colleagues in this week’s Discussion Forum, or is missing.

The response vaguely and inaccurately describes the professional organization related to the specialization selected. The response vaguely and inaccurately describes how to become an active member of this organization, or is missing.
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:

Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria. NURS 6003 Discussion Examining Nursing Specialties

Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.

Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.

No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.
Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:
Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct APA format with no errors.

Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.

Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
Total Points: 100
Name: NURS_6003_Module06_Week11_Assignment_Rubric. NURS 6003 Discussion Examining Nursing Specialties

PRAC 6665 Assignment: Practicum Experience Plan (PEP)

PRAC 6665 Assignment: Practicum Experience Plan (PEP)

As you establish your goals and objectives for this course, you are committing to an organized plan that will frame your practicum experience in a clinical setting, including planned activities, assessment, and achievement of defined outcomes. In particular, your plan must address the categories of clinical reasoning, quality in your clinical specialty, and interpersonal collaborative practice.

For this Assignment, you will consider the areas you aim to focus on to gain practical experience as an advanced practice nurse. Then, you will develop a Practicum Experience Plan (PEP) containing the objectives you will fulfill in order to achieve your aims. In this practicum experience, when developing your goals and objectives, be sure to keep PMHNP clinical skills in mind. PRAC 6665 Assignment: Practicum Experience Plan (PEP)

ORDER  A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER  NOW

To Prepare

  • Review your Clinical Skills Self-Assessment Form you submitted last week, and think about areas for which you would like to gain application-level experience and/or continued growth as an advanced practice nurse. How can your experiences in the practicum help you achieve these aims? There may be overlap between your skills goals and your PEP goals.
  • Review the information related to developing objectives provided in this week’s Learning Resources. Your practicum learning objectives that you want to achieve during your practicum experience must be:
    • Specific
    • Measurable
    • Attainable
    • Results-focused
    • Time-bound
    • Reflective of the higher-order domains of Bloom’s taxonomy (i.e., application level and above)
  • Discuss your professional aims and your proposed practicum objectives with your Preceptor to ascertain if the necessary resources are available at your practicum site.
  • Select one nursing theory and one counseling theory to best guide your clinical practice. Explain why you selected these theories. Support your approach with evidence-based literature.
  • Create a timeline of practicum activities that demonstrates how you plan to meet these goals and objectives based on your practicum requirements. PRAC 6665 Assignment: Practicum Experience Plan (PEP)

ORDER  A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER  NOW

The Assignment

Record the required information in each area of the Practicum Experience Plan template, including three to four (3–4) measurable practicum Learning Objectives you will use to facilitate your learning during the practicum experience.

By Day 7 of Week 2

Submit your Experience Plan for assessment and Faculty approval.

When your Instructor has approved your plan, forward the signed PEP to your Preceptor, and retain a copy for your records.

Submission and Grading Information

To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

  • Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK2Assgn2+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name. PRAC 6665 Assignment: Practicum Experience Plan (PEP)
  • Click the Week 2 Assignment 2 Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
  • Click the Week 2 Assignment 2 link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
  • Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK2Assgn2+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
  • If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
  • Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.

Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:

Week 2 Assignment 2 Rubric

 

Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

Submit your Week 2 Assignment 2 draft and review the originality report.

 

Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 2

To participate in this Assignment:

Week 2 Assignment

NURS 6512N Discussion: Building a Health History

NURS 6512N Discussion: Building a Health History

Building a Health History

Case Study B: 14-year-old biracial male living with his grandmother in a high-density public housing complex

When establishing an initial relationship with a new patient, it is wise to build a history based on an involved joint effort that genuinely reflects the unique perspectives of the individual being interviewed (Ball et al., 2019).   The key to establishing a positive patient relationship lies in the 4 C’s of effective communication: courtesy, comfort, connection, and confirmation (Ball et al., 2019). Throughout this discussion, I will address some effective communication and interview techniques used specialized for the patient in the case study and recommend an appropriate assessment tool and develop five questions targeted for this specific patient.

Effective Communication and Interview Techniques

The basis for effective communication begins with trust.  Establishing a trusting relationship occurs through being courteous, providing emotional and physical comfort, an honest connection, and confirming that the patients’ concerns are understood.  Again, these are the 4 C’s of effective communication.  It is also important to remember that every patient is unique, and the initial interview should be tailored to the individual. NURS 6512N Discussion: Building a Health History

ORDER  A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER  NOW

The patient in the case study is a 14-year-old male, which creates some unique challenges to identify during the initial interview.  Obtaining consistent, continuous, and corroborative information and adolescent and family often poses a significant challenge (Srinath et al., 2019).   Adolescence is defined as the second decade of a child’s life and includes the physical, hormonal, and psychosocial changes that come with puberty.  Adolescents are particularly vulnerable during this period due to bodily changes, peer pressure, and self-identity establishment (Smith & McGuinness, 2017).  Children in this stage are also prone to risk-taking behaviors, including experimenting with smoking, drugs, alcohol, and sexual activity, which can have life-changing consequences.

Confidentiality is the most critical concept when addressing an adolescent.  It is crucial to introduce yourself and state your title to the patient when initiating the interview.  Especially when there may be a parent or family member present, adolescents may be reluctant to speak, which is where trust and confidentiality factor in.  In this case, a 14-year-old may or may not be comfortable discussing personal details in front of his grandmother.  In which case, she may be asked to step out and the interview conducted in private.  Situations need to be evaluated case by case.

The initial interview should be conducted in a welcoming environment with minimal distractions between the patient and the provider conducting the interview.  Discussions about the patients’ day-to-day experiences and open-ended conversations about home, school, activities, and friends prove beneficial (Ball et al., 2019).  Forcing the conversation with an adolescent can lead to confrontation, which adolescents do not handle well, thus jeopardizing any trust established. NURS 6512N Discussion: Building a Health History

Risk Assessment Tool

The screening tool I would use to determine and evaluate the risks for this patient is the HEEADSSS examination.  Given that our patient is of middle adolescence and a male, he is at a substantially increased risk of risk-taking behaviors.  Furthermore, his current living situation presents an additional threat to the patient’s well-being.  The HEEADSSS examination addresses the home environment, education, eating, activities, drugs/alcohol, sexuality, suicidality, and safety and is a valuable tool for assessing the physical, emotional, and social well-being of adolescents (Smith & McGuiness, 2017).

Targeted Questions

  1.  Can you tell me about your living situation and how things are going at home?
  2. How is it going at school? Is there any subject that you are doing great in/ or struggling with?
  3. Are you in a relationship? And if so, how is it going? Are you sexually active?
  4. What kind of activities do you like to do with your friends?
  5. Have you experimented with smoking? Drugs? Or Alcohol?
  6. Have you witnessed or been a victim of violence?

References

Ball, J. W., Jane W. Ball, D., Dains, J. E., Flynn, J. A., Flynn, J. A., Solomon, B. S., Solomon, B. S., Stewart, R. W., & Stewart, R. W. (2019). Seidel’s guide to physical examination: An interprofessional approach (9th ed.). Elsevier.

Sharma, E., Srinath, S., Jacob, P., & Gautam, A. (2019). Clinical practice guidelines for assessment of children and adolescents. Indian Journal of Psychiatry61(8), 158. https://doi.org/10.4103/psychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_580_18

Smith, G. L., & McGuinness, T. M. (2017). Adolescent psychosocial assessment: The HEEADSSS. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services55(5), 24-27. https://doi.org/10.3928/02793695-20170420-03

Effective communication is vital to constructing an accurate and detailed patient history. A patient’s health or illness is influenced by many factors, including age, gender, ethnicity, and environmental setting. As an advanced practice nurse, you must be aware of these factors and tailor your communication techniques accordingly. Doing so will not only help you establish rapport with your patients, but it will also enable you to more effectively gather the information needed to assess your patients’ health risks. NURS 6512N Discussion: Building a Health History

For this Discussion, you will take on the role of a clinician who is building a health history for a particular new patient assigned by your Instructor.

Photo Credit: Sam Edwards / Caiaimage / Getty Images

To prepare:

With the information presented in Chapter 1 of Ball et al. in mind, consider the following:

  • By Day 1 of this week, you will be assigned a new patient profile by your Instructor for this Discussion. Note: Please see the “Course Announcements” section of the classroom for your new patient profile assignment.
  • How would your communication and interview techniques for building a health history differ with each patient?
  • How might you target your questions for building a health history based on the patient’s social determinants of health?
  • What risk assessment instruments would be appropriate to use with each patient, or what questions would you ask each patient to assess his or her health risks?
  • Identify any potential health-related risks based upon the patient’s age, gender, ethnicity, or environmental setting that should be taken into consideration.
  • Select one of the risk assessment instruments presented in Chapter 1 or Chapter 5 of the Seidel’s Guide to Physical Examination text, or another tool with which you are familiar, related to your selected patient.
  • Develop at least five targeted questions you would ask your selected patient to assess his or her health risks and begin building a health history.

 

By Day 3 of Week 1

Post a summary of the interview and a description of the communication techniques you would use with your assigned patient. Explain why you would use these techniques. Identify the risk assessment instrument you selected, and justify why it would be applicable to the selected patient. Provide at least five targeted questions you would ask the patient.

Note: For this Discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by clicking on the “Post to Discussion Question” link, and then select “Create Thread” to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click on Submit, you cannot delete or edit your own posts, and you cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking on Submit!

 

Read a selection of your colleagues’ responses.

By Day 6 of Week 1

Respond to at least two of your colleagues on 2 different days who selected a different patient than you, using one or more of the following approaches:

  • Share additional interview and communication techniques that could be effective with your colleague’s selected patient.
  • Suggest additional health-related risks that might be considered.
  • Validate an idea with your own experience and additional research.

    ORDER  A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER  NOW

Submission and Grading Information

Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:

Week 1 Discussion Rubric

 

Post by Day 3 of Week 1 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 1

To Participate in this Discussion:

Week 1 Discussion

NURS_6512_Week_1_Discussion_Rubric

Excellent Good Fair Poor
Main Posting
Points Range: 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)
“Answers all parts of the Discussion question(s) with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. Supported by at least three current, credible sources. Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. NURS 6512N Discussion: Building a Health History
Points Range: 40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
“Responds to the Discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least three credible sources. Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.
Points Range: 35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
“Responds to some of the Discussion question(s). One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed. Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Post is cited with two credible sources. Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Contains some APA formatting errors.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 34 (34%)
“Does not respond to the Discussion question(s) adequately. Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria. Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Contains only one or no credible sources. Not written clearly or concisely. Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.
Main Post: Timeliness
Points Range: 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Posts main post by Day 3.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
N/A
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
N/A
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not post main post by Day 3.
First Response
Points Range: 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)
“Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of Learning Objectives. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.
Points Range: 15 (15%) – 16 (16%)
“Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.
Points Range: 13 (13%) – 14 (14%)
“Response is on topic and may have some depth. Responses posted in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 12 (12%)
“Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited.
Second Response
Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
“Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of Learning Objectives. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.
Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
“Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.
Points Range: 12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
“Response is on topic and may have some depth. Responses posted in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 11 (11%)
“Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited.
Participation
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
N/A
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
N/A
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on three different days.
Total Points: 100

HLT 362 Assignment: Summary and Descriptive Statistics

HLT 362 Assignment: Summary and Descriptive Statistics

Description:

There is often the requirement to evaluate descriptive statistics for data within the organization or for health care information. Every year the National Cancer Institute collects and publishes data based on patient demographics. Understanding differences between the groups based upon the collected data often informs health care professionals towards research, treatment options, or patient education.

Using the data on the “National Cancer Institute Data” Excel spreadsheet, calculate the descriptive statistics indicated below for each of the Race/Ethnicity groups. Refer to your textbook and the Topic Materials, as needed, for assistance in with creating Excel formulas.

ORDER  A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER  NOW

Provide the following descriptive statistics:

1. Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median, and Mode
2. Measures of Variation: Variance, Standard Deviation, and Range (a formula is not needed for Range).
3. Once the data is calculated, provide a 150-250 word analysis of the descriptive statistics on the spreadsheet. This should include differences and health outcomes between groups. HLT 362 Assignment: Summary and Descriptive Statistics

APA style is not required, but solid academic writingis expected.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

 

1. Analyze a specified data set.
2. Describe how data influences epidemiological practices.
3. Evaluate data analyzed from research articles using different types of variables.

Description:

Read Chapter 5 in Applied Statistics for Health Care.

Excel for Windows Training

Description:

Review the “Excel for Windows Training” modules, located on the Microsoft Office website, and use them as resources for the Summary and Descriptive Data assignment, as needed.

The Visual Learner: Statistics

Description:

Refer to the “Visual Learner: Statistics” to learn more about the statistical calculations presented in this topic.

Ethics in Medical Research and Publication

Description:

Read “Ethics in Medical Research and Publication,” by Masic, Hodzic, and Mulic, from International Journal of Preventative Medicine(2014).

Chapter 2. Health Databases and Health Database Organizations: Uses, Benefits, and Concerns

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: HLT 362 Assignment: Summary and Descriptive Statistics

Description:

Read “Chapter 2. Health Databases and Health Database Organizations: Uses, Benefits, and Concerns,” by Donaldson and Lohr, from the online eBook, Health Data in the Information Age: Use, Discloser, and Privacy (1994), available on the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) website. HLT 362 Assignment: Summary and Descriptive Statistics

ORDER  A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER  NOW

Using Epidemiological Data to Guide Clinical Practice: Review of Studies on Cardiovascular Disease and Use of Combined Oral Contraceptives
Description:

Read “Using Epidemiological Data to Guide Clinical Practice: Review of Studies on Cardiovascular Disease and Use of Combined Oral Contraceptives,” by Hannaford and Owen-Smith, from BMJ (1998).

Secondary Data Analysis: Ethical Issues and Challenges

Description:

Read “Secondary Data Analysis: Ethical Issues and Challenges,” by Tripathy, from Iranian Journal of Public Health
(2013).

What Are the Major Ethical Issues in Conducting Research? Is There a Conflict Between the Research Ethics and the Nature of Nursing?
Description:

Read “What Are the Major Ethical Issues in Conducting Research? Is There a Conflict Between the Research Ethics and the Nature of Nursing?” by Fouka and Mantzorou, from Health Scinece Journal (2011).

Ethical Challenges of Researchers in Qualitative Studies: The Necessity to Develop a Specific Guideline
Description:

Read “Ethical Challenges of Researchers in Qualitative Studies: The Necessity to Develop a Specific Guideline,” by Sanjari, Bahramnezhad, Fomani, Shoghi, and Cheraghi, from Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine (2014).

Challenges in Conducting Qualitative Research in Health: A Conceptual Paper

Description:

Read “Challenges in Conducting Qualitative Research in Health: A Conceptual Paper,” by Khankeh, Ranjbar, Khorasani-Zavareh, Zargham-Boroujeni, and Johansson, from Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research (2015).

Article Analysis and Evaluation of Research Ethics

Description:

Use the “Article Analysis and Evaluation of Research Ethics” template to complete the Article Analysis and Evaluation of Research Ethics assignment.

National Cancer Institute Data

Description:

Use the “National Cancer Institute Data” Excel spreadsheet to complete the Summary and Descriptive Statistics assignment. HLT 362 Assignment: Summary and Descriptive Statistics

Assignment: NUR646 Nurse Educator Electronic Portfolio

Assignment: NUR646 Nurse Educator Electronic Portfolio

NUR646 Nursing Education Seminar 1

Week 1 Assignment

Nurse Educator Electronic Portfolio

For this program, you will be creating a working electronic portfolio that can be utilized when trying to obtain a position as a nurse educator. The electronic portfolio will encompass several artifacts from your practicum courses. Use the “Nurse Educator Electronic Portfolio,” resource to guide you in collecting the required artifacts for this. You will submit the completed electronic portfolio in NUR-665E.

ORDER  A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER  NOW

Nurse Educator Electronic Portfolio

Throughout the seminar course, you will develop a professional electronic portfolio that will be used for personal reflection and growth; and for employment applications and interviews upon completion of the program.

As you complete various portions of the seminar, you should identify and incorporate artifacts into your portfolios to demonstrate your accomplishments. Assignment: NUR646 Nurse Educator Electronic Portfolio

The electronic portfolio should include the following:

1.            Introductory statement to your portfolio

2.            Professional Resume/CV

3.            Nurse Educator Teaching Philosophy

4.            Written Objectives

5.            Lesson Plan

6.            One additional artifact that demonstrates mastery of the course. This could possibly be pulled from your clinical experience

In addition, you will need to include explanations of mastery for each artifact.

Students will submit their completed portfolios at the end of the course.

Students can use any one of a number of free electronic portfolio software programs. Some recommendations include the following:

•             Google Sites   https://sites.google.com/

•             Evernote         https://evernote.com/

•             Three Ring     https://threering.com/

•             Weebly           https://www.weebly.com/

When selecting a program, be sure it is one that can be marked or set as ‘private’ so that only you can allow access to the content. You will be asked to submit your e-folio for review periodically throughout the program by providing your instructor with the URL link. Assignment: NUR646 Nurse Educator Electronic Portfolio

As health professionals, nurses are responsible for staying abreast of current professional knowledge and managing their own career, professional growth and development, and ideally, practices to support these activities should start during their student years. Interest in electronic or eportfolios is gathering momentum as educationalists explore their potential as a strategy for fostering lifelong learning and enhancing on-going personal and professional development. In this paper, we present an overview of e-portfolios and their application to nurse education, highlighting potential benefits and considerations of useage. We argue that the e-portfolio can represent an authentic means of assessing cognitive, reflective and affective skills. Furthermore, the e-portfolio provides a means through which nurses can record and provide evidence of skills, achievements, experience, professional development and on-going learning, not only for themselves, but for the information and scrutiny of registration boards, employers, managers and peers. Assignment: NUR646 Nurse Educator Electronic Portfolio