|
Proposed Solution for Identified Project Topic and Implications for Nursing Practice
Proposed Solution for Identified Project Topic and Implications for Nursing Practice
|
0 points
A proposed solution to the identified project topic with an explanation of how it will affect nursing practice is omitted.
|
3 points
Topic is presented but criteria are incomplete.
|
3.16 points
Topic and most criteria are presented. There are some omissions or inaccuracies. Some support is needed.
|
3.56 points
Topic and criteria are presented. Minor aspects are unclear or require support.
|
4 points
Topic and criteria are clearly and logically presented. Support and rationale are evident.
|
|
Effect of Identified Problem or Issue
Effect of Identified Problem or Issue
|
0 points
Effect of the identified problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project is omitted.
|
4.5 points
Effect of the identified problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project is presented but is largely incomplete.
|
4.74 points
Effect of the identified problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project is summarized. There are some omissions or inaccuracies. Some support is needed.
|
5.34 points
Effect of the identified problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project is presented. Minor aspects are unclear or require support.
|
6 points
Effect of the identified problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project is clearly and logically presented. Support and rationale are evident.
|
|
Development, Structure, and Conclusion
Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves from development.
|
0 points
No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.
|
2.1 points
Writing lacks logical progression of the thesis, position, or purpose. Some organization is attempted, but ideas are disconnected. Conclusion is unclear and not supported by the overall development of the purpose. Capstone Project Topic Selection and Approval
|
2.21 points
Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.
|
2.49 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.
|
2.8 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and logical conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.
|
|
Detailed Description of Project Topic
Detailed Description of Project Topic
|
0 points
A description of the project topic is omitted.
|
4.5 points
A description of the project topic is presented but is largely incomplete.
|
4.74 points
A description of the project topic is presented. There are some omissions or inaccuracies. Some support is needed.
|
5.34 points
A description of the project topic is presented. Minor aspects are unclear or require support.
|
6 points
A detailed description of the project topic is clearly and logically presented. Support and rationale are evident.
|
|
Project Topic for Focus of Change Proposal
Project Topic for Focus of Change Proposal
|
0 points
The problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project that will be the focus of the change proposal is omitted.
|
1.5 points
The problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project that will be the focus of the change proposal is presented but is largely incomplete. Capstone Project Topic Selection and Approval
|
1.58 points
The problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project that will be the focus of the change proposal is summarized. There are some omissions or inaccuracies. Some support is needed.
|
1.78 points
The problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project that will be the focus of the change proposal is presented. Minor aspects are unclear or require support.
|
2 points
The problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project that will be the focus of the change proposal is clearly and logically presented. Support and rationale are evident.
|
|
Evidence
Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers other perspectives.
|
0 points
Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies entirely on the perspective of the writer.
|
1.8 points
Evidence is limited or irrelevant. The interpretation of other perspectives is superficial or incorrect.
|
1.9 points
Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or integration of other perspectives is present.
|
2.14 points
Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.
|
2.4 points
Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Relevant perspectives of others are clearly considered.
|
|
Thesis, Position, or Purpose
Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.
|
0 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate audience is evident.
|
2.1 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is unfocused or confused. There is very little awareness of the intended audience.
|
2.21 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.
|
2.49 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately presented. An awareness of the appropriate audience is demonstrated.
|
2.8 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly directed to a specific audience.
|
|
Mechanics of Writing
Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.
|
0 points
Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
|
1.8 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
|
1.9 points
Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
|
2.14 points
Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.
|
2.4 points
No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.
|
|
Setting or Context Where Project Topic Is Observed
Setting or Context Where Project Topic Is Observed
|
0 points
The setting or context in which the problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project can be observed is omitted.
|
3 points
The setting or context in which the problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project can be observed is presented but is largely incomplete.
|
3.16 points
The setting or context in which the problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project can be observed is summarized. There are some omissions or inaccuracies. Some support is needed.
|
3.56 points
The setting or context in which the problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project can be observed is presented. Minor aspects are unclear or require support.
|
4 points
The setting or context in which the problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project can be observed is logically presented. Support and rationale are evident.
|
|
Topic Significance and Implications for Nursing Practice
Topic Significance and Implications for Nursing Practice
|
0 points
Significance of topic and its implications for nursing practice is omitted.
|
3 points
Topic is presented but criteria are incomplete.
|
3.16 points
Topic and most criteria are presented. There are some omissions or inaccuracies. Some support is needed.
|
3.56 points
Topic and criteria are presented. Minor aspects are unclear or require support.
|
4 points
Topic and criteria are clearly and logically presented. Support and rationale are evident.
|
|
Peer-Reviewed Articles
Peer-Reviewed Articles
|
0 points
Fewer than six peer-reviewed articles are presented.
|
1.5 points
Fewer than seven peer-reviewed articles are presented. Overall, only five articles meet the assignment criteria. Capstone Project Topic Selection and Approval
|
1.58 points
Eight peer-reviewed articles are presented. Overall, only six articles meet the assignment criteria.
|
1.78 points
Eight peer-reviewed articles are presented. Overall, only seven articles meet the assignment criteria.
|
2 points
Eight peer-reviewed articles are presented, and each article clearly meets the assignment criteria.
|
|
Format/Documentation
Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.
|
0 points
Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.
|
1.2 points
Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.
|
1.26 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.Capstone Project Topic Selection and Approval
|
1.42 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
|
1.6 points
No errors in formatting or documentation are present.
|
Alcohol and Drug Addiction – Alcohol and Benzos Transcript.pdf
