Moral Dilemmas And Ethical Decisions Assignment

Moral Dilemmas And Ethical Decisions Assignment

Create a 15-minute oral presentation (3–4 pages) that examines the moral  and ethical issues related to triaging patients in an emergency room.

Working in an emergency room gives rise to ethical dilemmas. Due to time  restraints and the patient’s cognitive impairment and lack of medical  history, complications can and do occur. The nurse has very little time  to get detailed patient information. He or she must make a quick  assessment and take action based on hospital protocol. The organized  chaos of the emergency room presents unique ethical challenge, which is  why nurses are required to have knowledge of ethical concepts and  principles.

Your supervisor has asked you to do a 15-minute oral presentation at a  staff meeting about a recent issue that occurred at another hospital in  town. Following an industrial accident, two patients arrived at the  emergency room of that hospital at the same time, presenting with very  similar inhalation injuries. The hospital received a great deal of  negative press due to how the patients were triaged in the ER. Your  supervisor would like you to use the specifics of this case to review  triage procedures and best practices at your facility. Here are the  details:

  • One is a 32-year-old firefighter, Frank Jeffers, who is  presenting with respiratory difficulties that he obtained while  evacuating victims of an industrial accident. He is a married homeowner  and father of two young boys. He has lived in the community all his  life. He has full and comprehensive health insurance through his  employer. Moral Dilemmas And Ethical Decisions Assignment
  • The other is Brent Damascus, a 58-year-old man. Brent is  presenting with respiratory difficulties with the same intensity as Mr.  Jeffers above. He is well known at the hospital emergency room, as he is  a frequent visitor with various complaints, including asthma,  headaches, and tremors. He is homeless, unemployed, and uninsured. He  stays many nights at the YMCA and eats lunch at the soup kitchen. He has  lived in the community for over 10 years and has been arrested several  times for petty theft.

Preparation

Search the Capella library and the Internet for scholarly and  professional peer-reviewed articles on best practices in triage nursing.  You will need at least three articles to use as support for your work  on this assessment.

ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED SOLUTION PAPERS

Directions

Create a 15-minute presentation (3–4 pages) that examines the moral  and ethical issues that occurred when triaging these two patients and  the best practices for managing this in the future.

Divide your draft into a number of talking points that you can  summarize neatly. Keep in mind that an oral presentation requires  slightly different language than an essay. The aim is to communicate  your message so keep sentences simple and focus on the key points you  want to deliver. Address the following in your presentation:

  • Explain the health care policies and protocols that are in place that direct triage care in an emergency situation.
  • Explain how health care disparities impact treatment decisions.
  • Identify the health care policies that are in place that direct  care for uninsured individuals. Is there a difference in how these  individuals are triaged?
  • Describe the moral and ethical challenges nurses can face when  following hospital policies and protocols. Is there a conflict when a  severely injured person is also uninsured?
  • Recommend evidence-based strategies that should be applied for managing the care of uninsured and indigent population. Moral Dilemmas And Ethical Decisions Assignment

Additional Requirements

Your presentation should meet the following requirements:

  • Written communication: Written communication should be free of errors that detract from the overall message.
  • References: Include a reference section with a  minimum of three references; a majority of these should be peer-reviewed  sources. All resources should have been published within the last 5  years.
  • APA format: Resources and citations should be formatted according to current APA style and formatting.
  • Length: 3–4 typed, double-spaced pages, excluding title page and reference page. Use Microsoft Word to complete the assessment.
  • Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12-point. Moral Dilemmas And Ethical Decisions Assignment

Technology Across The Care Continuum Assignment

Technology Across The Care Continuum Assignment

In the role of a nurse leader, describe the effective use of  patient-care technologies across the care continuum in a chosen health  care system.

Preparation

Choose any type of health care system, for example, acute, ambulatory, or home health or telehealth.

Directions

Submit the following for this assessment:

Technology Across the Care Continuum

Include the following in your 3–4-page description:

  • A brief overview of the care continuum in your selected health care system.
  • Describe the types of patient-care technologies and how they are  used across the care continuum in your system. Be sure to include  communication and information systems.
  • Identify strengths and weaknesses in the systems and describe how to manage change and technology to improve patient outcomes.
  • Support your description of effective patient care with current nursing and informatics theoretical ideas. Technology Across The Care Continuum Assignment

ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED SOLUTION PAPERS

Executive Summary

Based on the description above, add a 1-page executive summary that captures the following points:

  • Current state of technology across the care continuum in your system.
  • Proposed improvements.
  • Risks of making or not making changes or improvements.
  • Recommended next steps.

Additional Requirements

  • Written communication: Ensure written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message.
  • APA formatting: Format resources and citations according to current APA style and formatting guidelines.
  • Number of resources: Cite a minimum of four peer-reviewed resources.
  • Length: Submit 4–5 typed, double-spaced pages.
  • Font and font size: Use Times New Roman, 12 point. Technology Across The Care Continuum Assignment

Assessment 1 Instructions: Applying Ethical Principles

Assessment 1 Instructions: Applying Ethical Principles

Develop a solution to a specific ethical dilemma faced by a health care professional by applying ethical principles. Describe the issues and a possible solution in a 3-5-page paper.

Introduction

Whether you are a nurse, a public health professional, a health care administrator, or in another role in the health care field, you must base your decisions on a set of ethical principles and values. Your decisions must be fair, equitable, and defensible. Each discipline has established a professional code of ethics to guide ethical behavior. In this assessment, you will practice working through an ethical dilemma as described in a case study. Your practice will help you develop a method for formulating ethical decisions.

ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED SOLUTION PAPERS

Demonstration of Proficiency

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment scoring guide criteria:

Competency 1: Apply information literacy and library research skills to obtain scholarly information in the field of health care. Apply academic peer-reviewed journal articles relevant to an ethical problem or issue as evidence to support an analysis of the case. Assessment 1 Instructions: Applying Ethical Principles

Competency 3: Apply ethical principles and academic standards to the study of health care. Summarize the facts in a case study and use the three components of an ethical decision-making model to analyze an ethical problem or issue and the factors that contributed to it. Discuss the effectiveness of the communication approaches present in a case study. Discuss the effectiveness of the approach used by a professional to deal with problems or issues involving ethical practice in a case study. Apply ethical principles to a possible solution to an ethical problem or issue described in a case study.

Competency 4: Write for a specific audience, in appropriate tone and style, in accordance with Capella’s writing standards. Write clearly and logically, with correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics. Write following APA style for in-text citations, quotes, and references.

Instructions

Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. At a minimum, be sure to address each point. In addition, you are encouraged to review the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.

For this assessment, develop a solution to a specific ethical dilemma faced by a health care professional. In your assessment:

1. Access the Ethical Case Studies media piece to review the case studies you will be using for this assessment. Select the case most closely related to your area of interest and use it to complete the assessment.

Note: The case study may not supply all of the information you need. In such cases, you should consider a variety of possibilities and infer potential conclusions. However, please be sure to identify any assumptions or speculations you make.

Include the selected case study in your reference list, using proper APA style and format. Refer to the Evidence and APA section of the Writing Center for guidance.

2. Summarize the facts in a case study and use the three components of an ethical decision-making model to analyze an ethical problem or issue and the factors that contributed to it.

Identify which case study you selected and briefly summarize the facts surrounding it. Identify the problem or issue that presents an ethical dilemma or challenge and describe that dilemma or challenge.

Identify who is involved or affected by the ethical problem or issue.

Access the Ethical Decision-Making Model media piece and use the three components of the ethical decision-making model (moral awareness, moral judgment, and ethical behavior) to analyze the ethical issues.

Apply the three components outlined in the Ethical Decision-Making Model media. Assessment 1 Instructions: Applying Ethical Principles

Analyze the factors that contributed to the ethical problem or issue identified in the case study. Describe the factors that contributed to the problem or issue and explain how they contributed.

3. Apply academic peer-reviewed journal articles relevant to an ethical problem or issue as evidence to support an analysis of the case.  In addition to the readings provided, use the Capella library to locate at least one academic peer-reviewed journal article relevant to the problem or issue that you can use to support your analysis of the situation. The How Do I Find Peer-Reviewed Articles? library guide will help you locate appropriate references.

Cite and apply key principles from the journal article as evidence to support your critical thinking and analysis of the ethical problem or issue.

Course Navigation  image of Andrea

Swails Andrea Swails FACULTY 

image of Mark

Whitley Mark Whitley COACH 

Tutorials Support Log Out Beatriz Morales Rico

 

 

9/17/2021 Assessment 1 Instructions: Applying Ethical Principles –…

https://courserooma.capella.edu/webapps/blackboard/content/listContent.jsp?course_id=_340330_1&content_id=_10372869_1 2/2

Review the Think Critically About Source Quality resource. Assess the credibility of the information source.

Assess the relevance of the information source.

4. Discuss the effectiveness of the communication approaches present in a case study. Describe how the health care professional in the case study communicated with others.

Assess instances where the professional communicated effectively or ineffectively.

Explain which communication approaches should be used and which ones should be avoided.

Describe the consequences of using effective and non-effective communication approaches.

5. Discuss the effectiveness of the approach used by a professional to deal with problems or issues involving ethical practice in a case study. Describe the actions taken in response to the ethical dilemma or issue presented in the case study. Assessment 1 Instructions: Applying Ethical Principles

Summarize how well the professional managed professional responsibilities and priorities to resolve the problem or issue in the case.

Discuss the key lessons this case provides for health care professionals.

6. Apply ethical principles to a possible solution to an ethical problem or issue described in a case study. Describe the proposed solution.

Discuss how the approach makes this professional more effective or less effective in building relationships across disciplines within his or her organization.

ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED SOLUTION PAPERS

Discuss how likely it is the proposed solution will foster professional collaboration.

7. Write clearly and logically, with correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics. Apply the principles of effective composition.

Determine the proper application of the rules of grammar and mechanics.

8. Write using APA style for in-text citations, quotes, and references. Determine the proper application of APA formatting requirements and scholarly writing standards.

Integrate information from outside sources into academic writing by appropriately quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing, following APA style.

Example Assessment: You may use the following to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like:

Assessment 1 Example [PDF].

Additional Requirements

Your assessment should also meet the following requirements:

Length: 3–5 typed, double-spaced pages, not including the title page and reference page. Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point. APA tutorial: Use the APA Style Paper Tutorial [DOCX] for guidance. Written communication: Use correct spelling, grammar, and punctuation. References: Integrate information from outside sources to include at least two references (the case study and an academic peer-reviewed journal article) and three in-text citations within the paper. APA format: Follow current APA guidelines for in-text citation of outside sources in the body of your paper and also on the reference page.

If you would like assistance in organizing your assessment, or if you simply have a question about your assessment, do not hesitate to ask faculty or the teaching assistants in the NHS Learner Success Lab for guidance and suggestions.

SCORING GUIDE

Use the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated. Assessment 1 Instructions: Applying Ethical Principles

End-Of-Life Decisions Assignment

End-Of-Life Decisions Assignment

Write an article for a community newsletter for a local retirement  village that explains the laws, policies, and choices surrounding  end-of-life health care decisions.

 

Nurses are at the bedside during the dying process; they spend  entire shifts with patients and families; they develop trusting  relationships; and they are competent to assess patient and family  needs. Nurses gain a unique perspective that allows them to become aware  when a patient is not responding to treatment. This perspective places  nurses in a position to facilitate end-of-life decision making. (Adams,  Bailey. Anderson, & Docherty, 2011, para. 4)

ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED SOLUTION PAPERS

Reference

Adams, J. A., Bailey, D. E., Jr., Anderson, R.  A., & Docherty, S. L. (2011). Nursing roles and strategies in  end-of-life decision making in acute care: A systematic review of the  literature. Nursing Research and Practice, 2011.

Your manager asked you to prepare an article for a community  newsletter for a local retirement village. The editor wants you to talk  about the laws, policies, and choices surrounding end-of-life health  care decisions

Preparation

Search the Capella library and the Internet for scholarly and  professional peer-reviewed articles on end-of-life care. You will need  at least three articles to use as support for your work on this  assessment. End-Of-Life Decisions Assignment

Directions

Write an article of 750–1,000 words (3–4 pages) that discusses the  laws, policies, and choices surrounding end-of-life health care  decisions. Address the following in your article:

  • Describe the role of the nurse in end-of-life decision making with patients and their families.
  • Explain the legislation that generated end-of-life health care  policies. Was the legislation an outcome of a specific medical case?
  • Identify the primary policies regarding current health care  practices related to end-of-life health care decisions. How to these  policies affect treatment decisions?
  • Explain the effect of end-of-life regulations and controls on  patient outcomes. What effect does this have on the nurse-patient  relationship?
  • Describe the ethical considerations that have influenced policy decisions in regard to end-of-life decisions.

Additional Requirements

Your article should meet the following requirements:

  • Written communication: Written communication should be free of errors that detract from the overall message.
  • References: Cite a minimum of three resources; a  majority of these should be peer-reviewed sources. Your reference list  should be appropriate to the body of literature available on this topic  that has been published in the past 5 years.
  • APA format: Resources and citations should be formatted according to current APA style and formatting.
  • Length: 750–1,000 words or 3–4 typed,  double-spaced pages, excluding title page and reference page. Use  Microsoft Word to complete the assessment.
  • Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12-point. End-Of-Life Decisions Assignment

Heart Failure Clinic Resourcing Plan Assignment

Heart Failure Clinic Resourcing Plan Assignment

Write a 3–4 page evidence-based resourcing plan for one component of the Heart Failure Clinic.

It is important for the nurse leader to have not only a basic  understanding of the budget process, but to understand how to work with  variances in staffing, patient loads, and supply costs in order to meet  the needs of the patients, without compromising the funding process of  the clinic.

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate  your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment  criteria:

  • Competency 3: Apply management strategies and best practices for  health care finance, human resources, and materials allocation  decisions to improve health care delivery and patient outcomes.
    • Apply evidence-based management strategies and best practices for resourcing health care services.
    • Describe management and accountability tools and procedures used to manage health delivery services and patient outcomes.
  • Competency 4: Apply professional standards of moral, ethical, and legal conduct in professional practice.
    • Apply legal and professional standards for resourcing outpatient services.
  • Competency 5: Communicate in manner that is consistent with the expectations of a nursing professional.
    • Write content clearly and logically, with correct use of grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and current APA style. Heart Failure Clinic Resourcing Plan Assignment

      ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED SOLUTION PAPERS

Instructions

Deliverable: Develop one component of an evidence-based resourcing plan.

Scenario:

The hospital leadership team has already allocated the major  capital expenditures for the heart failure clinic, such as the facility,  legal services, IT, and security services. However, as a member of the  nurse team, you have been asked to develop one component of a resourcing plan for the next leadership meeting.

You may use any combination of documents (for example, a  spreadsheet or a table) in addition to explanatory information to convey  information clearly and succinctly.

Choose  one of the following:

Budget:

  • Apply evidence-based management strategies and best practices for resourcing health care services.
    • Identify the business plan budget categories and subcategories (not necessarily the actual cost) to establish a new clinic.
    • Start-up expenses.
    • Examine fixed and variable costs.
    • Capital budget items.
      • Examples: salary and benefits, staffing mix, specialized equipment or materials, et cetera.
    • Contingency fund and parameters.
  • Apply legal and professional standards for resourcing outpatient services.
    • Explain the alignment to best practices and professional standards for cost effective outpatient services.
    • How will uninsured or underinsured patients be managed?
  • Describe management and accountability tools and procedures used to manage health delivery services and patient outcomes.
    • What data resources and tools analyze costs, health insurance, and hospitalization services?
    • How will billing be handled?
    • How will you determine if outpatient management is cost-effective?
    • How does transparency impact the consumer? Heart Failure Clinic Resourcing Plan Assignment

Staffing Plan:

  • Apply evidence-based management strategies and best practices for resourcing health care services.
    • Identify the disciplines and skill mix needed for appropriate staffing.
    • Estimate staffing requirements by discipline and staffing ratios (evidence-based).
    • Develop a sample staffing schedule.
    • How will you staff to meet corporate diversity goals or the needs of diverse patients?
    • Explain how delegation, collaboration, negotiation will affect staffing plan.
      • How does a union contract affect the staffing plan or schedule?
        • Examine the Nurse Practice Act for your state.
          • How does the Nurse Practice Act affect your staffing plan?
  • Apply legal and professional standards for resourcing outpatient services.
    • Align your staffing plan to best practices, the Nurse Practice  Act for your state, scope of practice, and the Joint Commission  standards for outpatients.
  • Describe management and accountability tools and procedures used to manage health delivery services and patient outcomes.
    • How will you know if staffing is cost-effective?
    • How will you know if staffing mix or schedule impacts patient outcomes?

Additional Requirements

  • Written communication: Written communication should be free of errors that detract from the overall message.
  • APA formatting: Resources and in-text citations should be formatted according to current APA style and formatting.
  • Length: The plan should be 3–4 pages in content length, double-spaced.
  • Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.
  • Number of resources: Support your plan with a minimum of three peer-reviewed resources, in addition to professional standards. Heart Failure Clinic Resourcing Plan Assignment

CRITICALLY APPRAISING QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE RESEARCH

CRITICALLY APPRAISING QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE RESEARCH

Review the following two quantitative and qualitative studies. You will describe the key elements of each study and complete a critical appraisal of each.

 

· All SOURCES ARE ATTACHED!!!! focusing on the EBP process, the PICO(T) process, and the important step of critically appraising research evidence.

· Describe the key elements of a research study.

· Complete a rapid critical appraisal of each study.

· Write an executive summary that compares the two studies.

ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED SOLUTION PAPERS

Document Format and Length

Your document should be 2-3 pages in length, including the overviews, rapid critical appraisals, and executive summary.  Create a table or other organized format for your answers to the questions on the RCA tool for each study

ASSINGMENT WEEK 3 NHS8065

CRITICALLY APPRAISING QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE RESEARCH

Introduction

Evidence-based practice involves finding the best research evidence to support an intervention, which is integrated with patient preferences and values and professional expertise, and then implemented. Once you have searched and found relevant and timely research studies, the next step is to evaluate the quality of their methods, design, and other elements and to explore the application of the evidence they provide in different scenarios and settings. It is of paramount importance to correctly identify the type of research methods used in the study—quantitative or qualitative, or a mixture of both—and to evaluate the study to ensure those methods are high-quality, valid, reliable, and accurate. Consequently, doctoral professionals must develop a working knowledge of how to identify and critically appraise specific, important elements of both quantitative and qualitative research studies. Rapid critical appraisal tools assist in developing this skill. CRITICALLY APPRAISING QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE RESEARCH

Preparation

· All SOURCES ARE ATTACHED!!!! focusing on the EBP process, the PICO(T) process, and the important step of critically appraising research evidence.

· Review the following two quantitative and qualitative studies. You will describe the key elements of each study and complete a critical appraisal of each.

Dorleijn, D. M. J., Luijsterburg, P. A. J., Reijman, M., Kloppenburg, M., Verhaar, J. A. N., Bindels, P. J. E., . . . Bierma-Zeinstra, S. (2018).  Intramuscular glucocorticoid injection versus placebo injection in hip osteoarthritis: A 12-week blinded randomised controlled trial.  Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 77(6), 875.

Howson, A., Turell, W., & Roc, A. (2018).  Perceived self-efficacy in B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas: Qualitative outcomes in patient-directed education.  Health Education Journal, 77(4), 430–443.

· Locate the following tools, found in Appendix B in your Evidence-based practice in nursing and healthcare textbook. You will use these tools to complete the appropriate rapid critical appraisal for each study. Choose the tool that matches the methods and design of each study.

. Rapid Critical Appraisal Questions for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs), page 711.

· RAPID CRITICAL APPRAISAL QUESTIONS FOR RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIALS (RCTS)

VALIDITY
1.Are the results of the study valid?
a.Were the participants randomly assigned to the experimental and control groups? Yes No Unknown
b.Was random assignment concealed from the individuals who were first enrolling participants into the study? Yes No Unknown
c.Were the participants and providers blind to the study group? CRITICALLY APPRAISING QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE RESEARCH Yes No Unknown
d.Were reasons given to explain why participants did not complete the study? Yes No Unknown
e.Were the follow-up assessments conducted long enough to fully study the effects of the intervention? Yes No Unknown
f.Were the participants analyzed in the group to which they were randomly assigned? Yes No Unknown
g.Was the control group appropriate? Yes No Unknown
h.Were the instruments used to measure the outcomes valid and reliable? Yes No Unknown
i.Were the participants in each of the groups similar on demographic and baseline clinical variables? Yes No Unknown
RELIABILITY
2.What are the results?
a.How large is the intervention or treatment effect (NNT, NNH, effect size? ____________________
b.How precise is the intervention or treatment (CI)? ____________________
APPLICABILITY
3.Will the results help me in caring for my patients?
a.Were all clinically important outcomes measured? Yes No Unknown
b.What are the risks and benefits of the treatment? ____________________
c.Is the treatment feasible in my clinical setting? Yes No Unknown
d.What are my patient’s/family’s values and expectations for the outcome that is trying to be prevented and the treatment itself? ____________________
Would you use the study results in your practice to make a difference in patient outcomes?

•If yes, how?

•If yes, why?

•If no, why not?

Additional Comments/Reflections:

 

Recommendation for article use within a body of evidence:

 

· © Fineout-Overholt & Melnyk, 2005. This form may be used for educational, practice change, and research purposes without permission.

· p. 711

.

. Rapid Critical Appraisal Questions for Qualitative Evidence, pages 715–716.

· RAPID CRITICAL APPRAISAL QUESTIONS FOR QUALITATIVE EVIDENCE

VALIDITY
1.Are the results of the study valid (i.e., trustworthy and credible)?
a.How were study participants chosen?
b.How were accuracy and completeness of data assured?
c.How plausible/believable are the results?
i.Are implications of the research stated? Yes No Unknown
1.May new insights increase sensitivity to others’ needs? Yes No Unknown
2.May understandings enhance situational competence? Yes No Unknown
d.What is the effect on the reader?      
1.Are results plausible and believable? Yes No Unknown
2.Is the reader imaginatively drawn into the experience? Yes No Unknown
RELIABILITY
2.What were the results?
a.Does the research approach fit the purpose of the study? Yes No Unknown
i.How does the researcher identify the study approach? Yes No Unknown
1.Are language and concepts consistent with the approach? Yes No Unknown
2.Are data collection and analysis techniques appropriate? Yes No Unknown
ii.Is the significance/importance of the study explicit? Yes No Unknown
1.Does review of the literature support a need for the study? Yes No Unknown
2.What is the study’s potential contribution?
iii.Is the sampling strategy clear and guided by study needs? Yes No Unknown
1.Does the researcher control selection of the sample? Yes No Unknown
2.Do sample composition and size reflect study needs? Yes No Unknown
b.Is the phenomenon (human experience) clearly identified?
i.Are data collection procedures clear? Yes No Unknown
1.Are sources and means of verifying data explicit? Yes No Unknown
2.Are researcher roles and activities explained? Yes No Unknown
ii.Are data analysis procedures described? Yes No Unknown
1.Does analysis guide direction of sampling and when it ends? Yes No Unknown
2.Are data management processes described? Yes No Unknown
c.What are the reported results (description or interpretation)?
i.How are specific findings presented?
1.Is presentation logical, consistent, and easy to follow? Yes No Unknown
2.Do quotes fit the findings they are intended to illustrate? Yes No Unknown
ii.How are overall results presented?
1.Are meanings derived from data described in context? Yes No Unknown
2.Does the writing effectively promote understanding? Yes No Unknown

· p. 715

· p. 716

APPLICABILITY
3.Will the results help me in caring for my patients?
a.Are the results relevant to persons in similar situations? Yes No Unknown
b.Are the results relevant to patient values and/or circumstances? Yes No Unknown
c.How may the results be applied in clinical practice?
Would you use the study results in your practice to make a difference in patient outcomes?

•If yes, how?

•If yes, why?

•If no, why not?

Additional Comments/Reflections:

 

Recommendation for article use within a body of evidence:

 

· © Fineout-Overholt & Melnyk, 2005. This form may be used for educational, practice change, and research purposes without permission.

· p. 716

.

Instructions

Write a paper in which you:

· Describe the key elements of a research study.

· Complete a rapid critical appraisal of each study.

· Write an executive summary that compares the two studies.

Document Format and Length

Your document should be 2-3 pages in length, including the overviews, rapid critical appraisals, and executive summary. CRITICALLY APPRAISING QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE RESEARCH

Supporting Evidence

Include at least two resources, other than the course textbook, to support your critical appraisals. Provide in-text citations and references in APA format for each study, the critical appraisal tools, and other resources used.

Assignment Grading

The following requirements correspond to the scoring guide criteria, so be sure to address each point. Read the performance-level descriptions in the scoring guide for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.

· Describe the key elements of a research study.

. Include the study’s purpose, methods, design, results, and any other aspects of the study you think are noteworthy.

. Consider how the study contributes to the scholarly literature.

· Evaluate the quality of each study, using the appropriate rapid critical appraisal tool (RCA).

. Create a table or other organized format for your answers to the questions on the RCA tool for each study.

. What evidence supports your assertions and conclusions?

· Compare a qualitative and quantitative study’s quality, significance, and the practical application of results (evidence) in a health care setting.

. Consider the following questions to guide the comparison of these studies in your executive summary:

. Which study provides the best overall evidence? What elements in the study led you to this conclusion?

. Which study provides subjective information that could be integrated to make positive changes to services, processes, systems, or patient care?

. What is the significance of each study’s results in a hospital setting? How do the results affect patients?

. How could the evidence found in each study be applied in different health care settings? In the overall health care industry?

· Support main points, assertions, arguments, or conclusions with relevant and credible evidence.

· Competency 2: Differentiate among qualitative, quantitative, and mixed research design, methods, and evidence for health care and public health.CRITICALLY APPRAISING QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE RESEARCH

. Describe the key elements of a research study.

· Competency 3: Evaluate the design, methods, results, and overall quality of qualitative research methods and results, within the context of evidence-based practice.

. Evaluate the quality of a research study, using the appropriate critical appraisal tool.

· Competency 4: Interpret the practical significance of quantitative and qualitative health care data analyses and results, using the evidence-based practice process.

. Compare a qualitative and quantitative study’s quality, significance, and the practical application of results (evidence) in a health care setting.

· Competency 5: Produce original, written work, in compliance with writing standards, that is a creative synthesis of information from credible sources.

. Support main points, assertions, arguments, or conclusions with relevant and credible evidence.

Preparation

· Review the following two quantitative and qualitative studies. You will describe the key elements of each study and complete a critical appraisal of each.

. Dorleijn, D. M. J., Luijsterburg, P. A. J., Reijman, M., Kloppenburg, M., Verhaar, J. A. N., Bindels, P. J. E., . . . Bierma-Zeinstra, S. (2018). Intramuscular glucocorticoid injection versus placebo injection in hip osteoarthritis: A 12-week blinded randomised controlled trial. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 77(6), 875.

. Howson, A., Turell, W., & Roc, A. (2018). Perceived self-efficacy in B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas: Qualitative outcomes in patient-directed education. Health Education Journal, 77(4), 430–443. CRITICALLY APPRAISING QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE RESEARCH

 

Assessment 1 Instructions: Preliminary Care Coordination Plan

Assessment 1 Instructions: Preliminary Care Coordination Plan

Develop a 3-4-page preliminary care coordination plan for an individual in your community with whom you choose to work. Identify and list available community resources for a safe and effective continuum of care.

NOTE: You are required to complete this assessment before Assessment 4.

The first step in any effective project or clinical patient encounter is planning. This assessment provides an opportunity for you to strengthen your understanding of how to plan and negotiate the coordination of care for an individual in your community as you consider the patient’s unique needs; the ethical, cultural, and physiological factors that affect care; and the critical resources available in your community that are the foundation of a safe plan for the continuum of care.

As you begin to prepare this assessment, you are encouraged to complete the Care Coordination Planning activity. Completion of this will provide useful practice, particularly for those of you who do not have care coordination experience in community settings. The information gained from completing this activity will help you succeed with the assessment. Completing formatives is also a way to demonstrate engagement.

ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED SOLUTION PAPERS

Demonstration of Proficiency

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment scoring guide criteria:

  • Competency 1: Adapt care based on patient-centered and person-focused factors.
    • Analyze a health concern and the associated best practices for health improvement.
  • Competency 2: Collaborate with patients and family to achieve desired outcomes.
    • Establish mutually agreed-upon health goals for a care coordination plan, in collaboration with the patient. Assessment 1 Instructions: Preliminary Care Coordination Plan
  • Competency 3: Create a satisfying patient experience.
    • Identify available community resources for a safe and effective continuum of care.
  • Competency 6: Apply professional, scholarly communication strategies to lead patient-centered care.
    • Write clearly and concisely in a logically coherent and appropriate form and style.

Preparation

Imagine that you are a staff nurse in a community care center. Your facility has always had a dedicated case management staff that coordinated the patient plan of care, but recently, there were budget cuts and the case management staff has been relocated to the inpatient setting. Care coordination is essential to the success of effectively managing patients in the community setting, so you have been asked by your nurse manager to take on the role of care coordination. You are a bit unsure of the process, but you know you will do a good job because, as a nurse, you are familiar with difficult tasks. As you take on this expanded role, you will need to plan effectively in addressing the specific health concerns of community residents.

As you assume your expanded care coordination role, you have been tasked with addressing the specific health concerns of a particular individual within the community. You decide to prepare a preliminary care coordination plan and proceed by identifying the patient’s three priorities for health and by investigating the resources available in your community for a safe and effective continuum of care. Assessment 1 Instructions: Preliminary Care Coordination Plan

To prepare for this assessment, you may wish to:

  • Review the assessment instructions and scoring guide to ensure that you understand the work you will be asked to complete.
  • Allow plenty of time to plan your patient clinical encounter.
  • Be sure that you have a patient in mind that you can work with throughout the course.

Note: Remember that you can submit all, or a portion of, your draft plan to Smarthinking Tutoring for feedback, before you submit the final version for this assessment. If you plan on using this free service, be mindful of the turnaround time of 24–48 hours for receiving feedback.

Instructions

Note: You are required to complete this assessment before Assessment 4.

This assessment has two parts.

Part 1: Develop the Preliminary Care Coordination Plan

Complete the following:

  • Identify a health concern as the focus of your care coordination plan. Possible health concerns may include, but are not limited to:
    • Stroke.
    • Heart disease (high blood pressure, stroke, or heart failure).
    • Home safety.
    • Pulmonary disease (COPD or fibrotic lung disease).
    • Orthopedic concerns (hip replacement or knee replacement).
    • Cognitive impairment (Alzheimer’s disease or dementia).
    • Pain management.
    • Mental health.
    • Trauma.
  • Identify available community resources for a safe and effective continuum of care.
Part 2: Secure Individual Participation in the Activity

Complete the following:

  • Contact local individuals who may be open to an interview and a care coordination plan addressing their health concerns. The person you choose to work with may be a colleague, community member, friend, or family member.
  • Meet with the individual to describe the care coordination plan session that you intend to provide. Collaborate with the participant in setting goals for the session, evaluating session outcomes, and suggesting possible revisions to the plan.
  • Establish a tentative date and time for the care coordination plan session. Document the name of the individual and a single point of contact, either an e-mail address or a phone number.
Document Format and Length

For your care coordination plan, you may use the Care Coordination Plan Template [DOCX], choose a format used in your own organization, or choose a format you are familiar with that adequately serves your needs for this assessment. Assessment 1 Instructions: Preliminary Care Coordination Plan

  • Your preliminary plan should be 3–4 pages in length. In a separate section of the plan, identify the person you have chosen to work with, and be sure to include his or her contact information.
  • Document the community resources you have identified using the Community Resources Template [DOCX].
Supporting Evidence

Cite at least two credible sources from peer-reviewed journals or professional industry publications that support your preliminary plan.

Grading Requirements

The requirements, outlined below, correspond to the grading criteria in the Preliminary Care Coordination Plan Scoring Guide, so be sure to address each point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.

  • Analyze your selected health concern and the associated best practices for health improvement.
    • Cite supporting evidence for best practices.
    • Consider underlying assumptions and points of uncertainty in your analysis.
  • Establish mutually agreed-upon health goals for the care coordination plan, in collaboration with the selected individual.
  • Identify available community resources for a safe and effective continuum of care.
  • Write clearly and concisely in a logically coherent and appropriate form and style.
    • Write with a specific purpose with your patient in mind.
    • Adhere to scholarly and disciplinary writing standards and current APA formatting requirements.
Additional Requirements

Before submitting your assessment, proofread your preliminary care coordination plan and community resources list to minimize errors that could distract readers and make it more difficult for them to focus on the substance of your plan. Be sure to submit both documents.

CORE ELMS

Important note: The time you spend securing individual participation in this activity and the time you spend presenting your final care coordination plan to the patient in Assessment 4 must total at least three hours. Be sure to log your time in the CORE ELMS system. The CORE ELMS link is located in the courseroom navigation menu.

Portfolio Prompt: Save your presentation to your ePortfolio. Submissions to the ePortfolio will be part of your final Capstone course. Assessment 1 Instructions: Preliminary Care Coordination Plan

Communicable Disease Chain Assignmnet

Communicable Disease Chain Assignmnet

Write a paper (2,000-2,500 words) in which you apply the concepts of epidemiology and nursing research to a communicable disease. Refer to “Communicable Disease Chain,” “Chain of Infection,” and the CDC website for assistance when completing this assignment.

ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED SOLUTION PAPERS

Communicable Disease Selection

Choose one communicable disease from the options below.

  1. Chickenpox
  2. Tuberculosis
  3. Influenza
  4. Mononucleosis
  5. Hepatitis B
  6. HIV
  7. Ebola
  8. Measles
  9. Polio
  10. Influenza

Epidemiology Paper Requirements

Address the following:

  1. Describe the chosen communicable disease, including causes, symptoms, mode of transmission, complications, treatment, and the demographic of interest (mortality, morbidity, incidence, and prevalence). Is this a reportable disease? If so, provide details about reporting time, whom to report to, etc.
  2. Describe the social determinants of health and explain how those factors contribute to the development of this disease.
  3. Discuss the epidemiologic triangle as it relates to the communicable disease you have selected. Include the host factors, agent factors (presence or absence), and environmental factors. Are there any special considerations or notifications for the community, schools, or general population?
  4. Explain the role of the community health nurse (case finding, reporting, data collection, data analysis, and follow-up) and why demographic data are necessary to the health of the community.
  5. Identify at least one national agency or organization that addresses the communicable disease chosen and describe how the organizations contribute to resolving or reducing the impact of disease.
  6. Discuss a global implication of the disease. How is this addressed in other countries or cultures? Is this disease endemic to a particular area? Provide an example.

A minimum of three peer-reviewed or professional references is required.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. Communicable Disease Chain Assignmnet

 

EBP Proposal Plan Power Point Presentation Assignment

EBP Proposal Plan Power Point Presentation Assignment

The dissemination of an evidence-based practice project proposal is an important part of the final project. Dissemination of your project to a local association or clinical site/practice informs important stakeholders of evidence-based interventions that can improve clinical practice and ultimately patient outcomes.

For this assignment, develop a professional presentation that could be disseminated to a professional group of your peers.

Develop a 12-15 slide PowerPoint detailing your evidence-based practice project proposal. Create speaker notes of 100-250 words for each slide. For the presentation of your PowerPoint, use Loom to create a voice-over or a video. Refer to the topic Resources for additional guidance on recording your presentation with Loom. Include an additional slide for the Loom link at the beginning and an additional slide for References at the end. Be sure to consider your personal demeanor and tone during the recorded presentation. EBP Proposal Plan Power Point Presentation Assignment

Include the following in your presentation:

1. Introduction (include PICOT statement)

2. Organizational Culture and Readiness

3. Problem Statement and Literature Review

4. Change Model, or Framework

5. Implementation Plan

6. Evaluation Plan

7. Conclusion

You are required to cite a minimum of six peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED SOLUTION PAPERS

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to turnitin. Please follow rubric.

Evidence-Based Practice Project: PICOT Paper

Generally, a high level of patient satisfaction for the clients in the emergency department (ED) is vital, especially at this time when the healthcare system is shifting towards patient-centered care. Prakash (2010) notes that patient satisfaction levels significantly impact on medical malpractice claims, patient retention, and clinical outcomes. That is, it affects quality healthcare’s timely, efficient, and patient-centered delivery, making it both a proxy but a very effective key indicator for measuring the hospitals and doctors’ success. Consequently, supporting the improvements of patient satisfaction levels can positively affect several healthcare organizations’ components, such as preventive possible malpractice lawsuits, securing a positive local reputation, and enhancing patient retention rates. Thus, there is an increased need to develop strategies to improve ED patient’s satisfaction with the provided care services. Increasingly, the use of real-time location systems (RTLS) by hospitals to track patients, instead of relying on the traditional, manually-entered status updates, is increasingly being viewed as a better strategy to decrease the number or rate of Left Without Being Treated (LWBT) patients, and thus, improve ED patient’s satisfaction levels and hospital’s revenue collection (Boulos & Berry, 2012). Thus, the paper will explore whether the utilization of RTLS in the hospital’s ED, compared to manually-entered status updates to tract patients, help decrease the rate of LWBT and to raise revenue collection within 6 months, for ED patients with decreasing satisfaction levels with the provided healthcare services. EBP Proposal Plan Power Point Presentation Assignment

A wide array of factors is responsible for the decreased rate of satisfaction levels amongst ED patients. The current delays, long waits, leaving without being treated, decreased revenue collection from the ED unit, and reduced patient satisfaction scores have negatively portrayed the hospital’s reputation to the public. As a result, the daily patient visits have continued to decrease as people attribute the facility to poor emergency care services delivery. All these complications result from the use of combined data resources and manual entry status updates when tracking patient records. This manual tracking cannot meet the demand for many patients and leads to overcrowding due to and reduced patient flow in the ED. Therefore, there is a need to install an automatic patient tracking system to increase the flow.

Patient satisfaction level, especially for hospital’s emergency department (ED) is increasingly becoming a key health quality indicator. Patient satisfaction regards the degree to which patients are happy with their healthcare (Heath, 2016). Patient satisfaction levels is a care quality measure and gives healthcare providers information on the various aspects of health and medicine, such as their care’s effectiveness and their empathy levels. According to Xesfingi & Vozikis (2016), patient satisfaction is a healthcare quality’s measure given that it provides insight into the provider’s success at realizing the patient’s care expectations, and is also a key patients’ perspective behavioral intention’s determinant. While satisfaction has always been an important factor when delivering any form of a service, it has recently gained prominence or primacy within the healthcare space, especially at this time when the healthcare industry is fast shifting towards patient-centered models. According to Vocera’s 2016 ‘Rise of the Chief Experience Officer’ report, about 64% of the interviewed healthcare professionals stated that their healthcare organizations prioritize patient satisfaction in a similar extent to which they value clinical workflow and patient safety improvements. Increasingly, patients are demanding a larger claim in their healthcare, with the expectation that their healthcare providers will attain a certain service level.

Healthcare quality is increasingly becoming a universal issue, making the healthcare industry to undergo rapid transformations. According to Asamrew, Endris and Tadesse (2020), the rapid transformations are primarily driven by the need to realize its patient population’s ever-increasing needs and demands, instead of the traditional professional practice standards-based needs. In their study of a patient’s satisfaction score with a specialize hospital in Ethiopia, the researchers determined that patient-healthcare provider interaction and general facility amenity-related factors explained about 96.4% of the variability in the net overall satisfaction score. The hospital’s inpatient pharmacy services, the availability of laboratory, radiology and pain management services, and good quality services provided by the hospital physicians positively influenced patient satisfaction scores. Additionally, availability of accommodation rooms, toilet cleanliness, and dietary services had significant association with the patient satisfaction levels. In yet another study, Son and Yom (2017) classifies the factors impacting on ED patient’s satisfaction levels into three interrelated forces, including predisposing characteristics, enabling resources and need. First, the predisposing characteristics include demographic factors (age, sex, marital status and past illness), social structure (education and employment), and belief (subjective health, perceived social class and attitude towards health service – quality and status). Secondly, then enabling resources include family (income and type of health insurance) and community (type of hospital, mode of arrival, time taken, delayed or missed treatment and frequency of visiting the ED). Finally, the need factors include reason for visit and service received. Joe Greskoviak, president and chief operating officer at Press Ganey, categorizes the factors into communication, provider empathy, and care coordination (Heath, 2016). All these points are interrelated and affect each other.

Delayed or missed treatments have become a notorious phenomenon in most hospitals. In a recent research by Asheim et al., (2019), it was discovered that the prolonged ED stay was associated with a higher probability of being discharged from the ED without admission to the hospital and that there was no significant difference in hospitalization length for the admitted patients. Thus, the researchers concluded that prolonged ED stay was not associated with increased risk of death. However, many studies have determined that delayed or missed treatments are strongly associated with decreased patient satisfaction levels and reduced revenue for hospitals. Furthermore, ED overcrowding also reduced emergency care quality by prolonged patient total length of stay, increased rate of patients left without being seen, ambulance diversion, decreased patient satisfaction, decreased revenue collection, and etcetera (Wang et al., 2017). According to Wand (2019), the lengthy documentation and assessment processes, timeliness of consultations and delays in decisions about patient disposition in ED can lead to reduced ED patient satisfaction levels and frustrations by ED staff and hospital executives. As noted above, the complications are primarily caused by the hospital’s reliance on combined data resources and manual entry status updates when tracking patients and their records – all of which cannot meet the healthcare service demand for the many patients, leading to reduced patient flow in the ED, overcrowding, and delayed and missed treatments. EBP Proposal Plan Power Point Presentation Assignment

Technology can significantly help hospitals solve the mentioned complications. Primarily, by installing a RTLS, an automatic patient tracking system in the ED, hospitals can significantly increase the patient flow in their EDs (Drazen & Rhoads, 2011). According to Garie Fallo, the Western Reserve Hospital’s CNO, a technology suite can help improve care efficiency in EDs and boost patient satisfaction scores by 90% through streamlining the clinical workflow (Heath, 2016). With an automatic patient tracking system, patients would not need to stop at any stage for manual tracking, stipulating that there would be neither delays, prolonged wait times on stretchers, nor family waiting. Rather, the process would appear more satisfied, with a very seamless move to the ED room. Thus, right from their arrival, the patients would have a higher satisfaction with the provided services. The side-effect of the high satisfaction scores, according to a review of various peer-reviewed publications on the importance of patient satisfaction carried out by Prakash (2010), includes improved patient loyalty and retention, reduced vulnerability to price wars or bargains, consistent improvement in revenue and profitability, increased staff morale with reduced staff turnover, reduced risk or malpractice suits and accreditation issues, and increase personal and professional satisfaction. Consequently, by installing the proposed RTLS, hospitals can improve the ED patient’s satisfaction levels. Specifically, RTLS, compared to the manually-entered status updates to tract patients, help decrease the rate of LWBT and to raise revenue collection within 6 months, for ED patients with decreasing satisfaction levels with the provided healthcare services. EBP Proposal Plan Power Point Presentation Assignment

References Asamrew, N., Endris, A. A., & Tadesse, M. (2020). Level of Patient Satisfaction with Inpatient Services and Its Determinants: A Study of a Specialized Hospital in Ethiopia. (J. Haughton, Ed.) Journal of Environmental and Public Health, 2020(Article ID 2473469), 1-12. Asheim, A., Nilsen, S. M., Carlsen, F., Næss-Pleym, L. E., Uleberg, O., Dale, J., et al. (2019, December). The Effect Of Emergency Department Delays On 30-Day Mortality in Central Norway. European Journal of Emergency Medicine, 26(6), 446-452. Boehm, L., & Petty, K. (2016). The Rise of the Healthcare Chief Experience Officer. Vocera’s Experience Innovation Network. Boulos, M. N., & Berry, G. (2012, June 28). Real-Time Locating Systems (RTLS) In Healthcare: A Condensed Primer. International Journal of Health Geographics, 11(25). Drazen, E., & Rhoads, J. (2011, April). Using Tracking Tools to Improve Patient Flow in Hospitals. Retrieved May 30, 2021, from California Health Care Foundation (Online): https://www.chcf.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/PDF-UsingPatientTrackingToolsInHospitals.pdf Heath, S. (2016, May 24). Patient Satisfaction and HCAHPS: What It Means for Providers. (Xtelligent Healthcare Media, LLC) Retrieved May 30, 2021, from Patient Engagement HIT (Online): https://patientengagementhit.com/features/patient-satisfaction-and-hcahps-what-it-means-for-providers Prakash, B. (2010). Patient Satisfaction. Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery, 3(3), 151–155. Son, H., & Yom, Y.-H. (2017). Factors Influencing Satisfaction With Emergency Department Medical Service: Patients’And Their Companions’Perspectives. Japan Journal of Nursing Science, 14, 27–37. Wand, T., Crawford, C., Bell, N., Murphy, M., White, K., & Wood, E. (2019, July). Documenting The Pre-Implementation Phase For A Multi-Site Translational Research Project To Test A New Model Emergency Department-Based Mental Health Nursing Care. International Emergency Nursing, 45, 10-16. Wang, H., Kline, J. A., Jackson, B. A., Robinson, R. D., Sullivan, M., Holmes, M., et al. (2017, October). The Role Of Patient Perception Of Crowding In The Determination Of Real-Time Patient Satisfaction At Emergency Department. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 29(5), 722–727. Xesfingi, S., & Vozikis, A. (2016, March 15). Patient Satisfaction With The Healthcare System: Assessing The Impact Of Socio-Economic And Healthcare Provision Factors. BMC Health Services Research, 16(94). EBP Proposal Plan Power Point Presentation Assignment

Assessment 3 Instructions: Disaster Recovery Plan

Assessment 3 Instructions: Disaster Recovery Plan

Develop a disaster recovery plan to lessen health disparities and improve access to community services after a disaster. Then, develop and record an 8-10 slide presentation (PowerPoint preferred) of the plan with audio for the Vila Health system, city officials, and the disaster relief team.

ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED SOLUTION PAPERS

As you begin to prepare this assessment, you are encouraged to complete the Disaster Preparedness and Management activity. The information gained from completing this activity will help you succeed with the assessment as you think through key issues in disaster preparedness and management in the community or workplace. Completing activities is also a way to demonstrate engagement.Assessment 3 Instructions: Disaster Recovery Plan

Professional Context
Nurses fulfill a variety of roles, and their diverse responsibilities as health care providers extend to the community. The decisions we make daily and in times of crisis often involve the balancing of human rights with medical necessities, equitable access to services, legal and ethical mandates, and financial constraints. When an unanticipated event occurs, such as an accident or natural disaster, issues can arise that complicate decisions about meeting the needs of an individual or group, including understanding and upholding their rights and desires, mediating conflict, and applying established ethical and legal standards of nursing care. As a nurse, you must be knowledgeable about disaster preparedness to safeguard those in your care. You are also accountable for promoting equitable quality of care for community residents.

This assessment provides an opportunity for you to apply the concepts of emergency preparedness, public health assessment, triage, management, and surveillance after a disaster. You will also focus on hospital evacuation and extended displacement periods.

Demonstration of Proficiency
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:

Competency 1: Analyze health risks and health care needs among distinct populations.
Describe the determinants of health and the cultural, social, and economic barriers that impact safety, health, and disaster recovery efforts in a community.
Competency 2: Propose health promotion strategies to improve the health of populations.
Present specific, evidence-based strategies to overcome communication barriers and enhance interprofessional collaboration to improve disaster recovery efforts.
Competency 3: Evaluate health policies, based on their ability to achieve desired outcomes.
Explain how health and governmental policy affect disaster recovery efforts.
Competency 4: Integrate principles of social justice in community health interventions.
Explain how a proposed disaster recovery plan will lessen health disparities and improve access to community services.
Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly communication strategies to lead health promotion and improve population health.
Present a compelling case to community stakeholders to obtain their approval and support for a proposed disaster recovery plan.
Note: Complete the assessments in this course in the order in which they are presented. Assessment 3 Instructions: Disaster Recovery Plan

ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED SOLUTION PAPERS

Preparation
When disaster strikes, community members must be protected. A comprehensive recovery plan, guided by the MAP-IT (Mobilize, Assess, Plan, Implement, Track) framework, is essential to help ensure everyone’s safety. The unique needs of residents must be assessed to lessen health disparities and improve access to equitable services after a disaster. Recovery efforts depend on the appropriateness of the plan, the extent to which key stakeholders have been prepared, and the allocation of available resources. In a time of cost containment, when personnel and resources may be limited, the needs of residents must be weighed carefully against available resources.

In this assessment, you are a member of a community task force responsible for developing a disaster recovery plan for the Vila Health community using MAP-IT, which you will present to city officials and the disaster relief team.

To prepare for the assessment, complete the Vila Health: Disaster Recovery Scenario simulation.

In addition, you are encouraged to complete the Disaster Preparedness and Management activity. The information gained from completing this activity will help you succeed with the assessment as you think through key issues in disaster preparedness and management in the community or workplace. Completing activities is also a way to demonstrate engagement.

Begin thinking about:

Community needs.
Resources, personnel, budget, and community makeup.
People accountable for implementation of the disaster recovery plan.
Healthy People 2020 goals.
A timeline for the recovery effort.
You may also wish to:

Review the MAP-IT (Mobilize, Assess, Plan, Implement, Track) framework, which you will use to guide the development of your plan:
Mobilize collaborative partners.
Assess community needs.
Plan to lessen health disparities and improve access to services.
Implement a plan to reach Healthy People 2020 objectives.
Track community progress.
Review the assessment instructions and scoring guide to ensure that you understand the work you will be asked to complete.
Note: Remember that you can submit all, or a portion of, your draft recovery plan to Smarthinking Tutoring for feedback, before you submit the final version for this assessment. If you plan on using this free service, be mindful of the turnaround time of 24–48 hours for receiving feedback.

Note: If you require the use of assistive technology or alternative communication methods to participate in this activity, please contact DisabilityServices@capella.edu to request accommodations.

Instructions
Complete the following:

Develop a disaster recovery plan for the Vila Health community that will lessen health disparities and improve access to services after a disaster. Refer back to the Vila Health: Disaster Recovery Scenario to understand the Vila Health community.
Assess community needs.
Consider resources, personnel, budget, and community makeup.
Identify the people accountable for implementation of the plan and describe their roles.
Focus on specific Healthy People 2020 goals.
Include a timeline for the recovery effort.
Use the MAP-IT (Mobilize, Assess, Plan, Implement, Track) framework to guide the development of your plan:
Mobilize collaborative partners.
Assess community needs.
Plan to lessen health disparities and improve access to services.
Implement a plan to reach Healthy People 2020 objectives.
Track community progress. Assessment 3 Instructions: Disaster Recovery Plan
Develop a slide presentation of your disaster recovery plan with an audio recording of you presenting your assessment of the Vila Health: Disaster Recovery Scenario for city officials and the disaster relief team.
Presentation Format and Length
You may use Microsoft PowerPoint (preferred) or other suitable presentation software to create your slides and add your voice-over. If you elect to use an application other than PowerPoint, check with your instructor to avoid potential file compatibility issues.

Be sure that your slide deck includes the following slides:

Title slide.
Recovery plan title.
Your name.
Date.
Course number and title.
References (at the end of your presentation).
Your slide deck should consist of 8–10 content slides plus title and references slides. Use the speaker’s notes section of each slide to develop your talking points and cite your sources as appropriate.

The following resources will help you create and deliver an effective presentation:

Record a Slide Show With Narration and Slide Timings.
This Microsoft article provides steps for recording slide shows in different versions of PowerPoint, including steps for Windows, Mac, and online.
Microsoft Office Software.
This Campus page includes tip sheets and tutorials for Microsoft PowerPoint.
PowerPoint Presentations Library Guide.
This library guide provides links to PowerPoint and other presentation software resources.
SoNHS Professional Presentation Guidelines [PPTX].
This presentation, designed especially for the School of Nursing and Health Sciences, offers valuable tips and links, and is itself a PowerPoint template that can be used to create a presentation.
Supporting Evidence
Cite at least three credible sources from peer-reviewed journals or professional industry publications to support your plan.

Graded Requirements
The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide, so be sure to address each point:

Describe the determinants of health and the cultural, social, and economic barriers that impact safety, health, and recovery efforts in the community.
Consider the interrelationships among these factors.
Explain how your proposed disaster recovery plan will lessen health disparities and improve access to community services.
Consider principles of social justice and cultural sensitivity with respect to ensuring health equity for individuals, families, and aggregates within the community.
Explain how health and governmental policy impact disaster recovery efforts.
Consider the implications for individuals, families, and aggregates within the community of legislation that includes, but is not limited to, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, and the Disaster Recovery Reform Act (DRRA).
Present specific, evidence-based strategies to overcome communication barriers and enhance interprofessional collaboration to improve the disaster recovery effort.
Consider how your proposed strategies will affect members of the disaster relief team, individuals, families, and aggregates within the community.
Include evidence to support your strategies.
Present a compelling case to community stakeholders to obtain their approval and support for the proposed disaster recovery plan.
Develop your presentation with a specific purpose and audience in mind.
Adhere to scholarly and disciplinary writing standards and APA formatting requirements.
Additional Requirements
Before submitting your assessment, proofread all elements to minimize errors that could distract readers and make it difficult for them to focus on the substance of your presentation.

Portfolio Prompt: Remember to save the assessment to your ePortfolio so that you may refer to it as you complete the final capstone course. Assessment 3 Instructions: Disaster Recovery Plan