Evidence-Based Practice In The Healthcare Discussion

Implementing evidence-based practice in the healthcare environment is critical for managing existing issues and needs and ensuring that the environment is adequately addressed. This practice incorporates the best practices and data for enhancing the management of the underlying practice issues and ensures that the healthcare environment is adequately and effectively managed. Clinical Decision Support and evidence-based practice are often interrelated and integrate clinical expertise, patient values and preferences, and the best available clinical research to make decisions and achieve the targeted experiences and outcomes. This approach provides healthcare professionals with timely, effective, and appropriate data for managing the challenges and issues affecting the healthcare environment (Zhao et al., 2023)Evidence-Based Practice In The Healthcare Discussion. Incorporating this approach in the clinical approach enhances the effectiveness of attaining the desired outcomes (Goldstein, 2023). This approach will enable healthcare professionals to make more informed, accurate, and effective decisions concerning the management plan. The synergy between evidence-based practice and clinical decision support often helps to bridge the gap between the underlying clinical practice and evidence-based practices.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM – FREE PAPER HERE

It is important to note that Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) and Clinical Decision Support (CDS) in healthcare are very related.EBP entails the integration of research findings, clinical experience, and patient preferences toward providing clinical care.CDS systems improve this process by delivering up-to-date, evidence-based information through advice, notification, or reminders directly to clinicians when care is being delivered. This integration assists in maintaining standards and compliance with evidence-based practice, enhancing patient experiences and healthcare quality, and decreasing mistakes and inconsistency in care. Evidence-Based Practice In The Healthcare Discussion

Clinical Decision Support Tool: Critique and Immediate Warning

Critique and immediate warning are commonly used CDS tools in practice nowadays. Clinicians receive notifications at the point closest to order entry, while the tool offers alerts of issues such as drug-drug interaction, allergy, or variance from standardized protocols. It acts as more of a safety net in that it slows down the process and allows for the identification of mistakes and evaluation of the appropriateness of the proposed interventions in light of current knowledge and patient characteristics. Therefore, professionals can incorporate this tool in healthcare decision-making and attain a safe and efficient care environment.

Data-Mining to Change Practice and Promote Health Outcomes

In the context of utilizing the critique and immediate warning CDS tool, data mining can also help improve the clinician practice guideline by indicating their behavior patterns and patients managed by those clinicians. For instance, it can demonstrate the often suppressed alerts and explain why this happens, that is, where there is a need for modification of the clinical guidelines in a particular area or where the clinicians need to be trained further (Sahoo et al., 2021)Evidence-Based Practice In The Healthcare Discussion. Hence, it is crucial to analyze such data to understand the extent of these issues, identify approaches to tackle them, and enhance patients’ care and safety in healthcare organizations and their professional development courses. In this case, the safety checks and procedures that professionals put in place can reduce some risks and adverse effects, like medication errors, patient falls, and other medication risks.

Furthermore, data mining can be utilized to evaluate the success of the CDS tool, which increases awareness of medication errors and adverse events. In this way, the outcomes of these alerts can be constantly reviewed to address alert fatigue and enhance the alert system’s effectiveness. Such iterations ensure that the CDS tool is useful in enhancing EBPM, patient care, and organizational learning in healthcare contexts.

References

Goldstein, N. D. (2023). A researcher’s guide to using electronic health records. CRC Press.

Sahoo, K. C., Negi, S., Patel, K., Mishra, B. K., Palo, S. K., & Pati, S. (2021). Challenges in maternal and child health services delivery and access during pandemics or public health disasters in low and middle-income countries: A systematic review. Healthcare, 9(7), 828. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9070828

Tsai, C. H., Eghdam, A., Davoody, N., Wright, G., Flowerday, S., & Koch, S. (2020). Effects of electronic health record implementation and barriers to adoption and use: A scoping review and qualitative content analysis. Life, 10(12), 1–27. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7761950/Evidence-Based Practice In The Healthcare Discussion

Zhao, C., Liang, N., Zhang, H., Li, H., Yang, Y., Zong, X., Chen, Y., Wang, Y., & Shi, N. (2023). Harnessing the power of clinical decision support systems: challenges and opportunities. Open Heart, 10(2), e002432–e002432. https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2023-002432

Relationship between Evidence-based Practice

Implementing evidence-based practice in the healthcare environment is critical for managing existing issues and needs and ensuring that the environment is adequately addressed. This practice incorporates the best practices and data for enhancing the management of the underlying practice issues and ensures that the healthcare environment is adequately and effectively managed. Clinical Decision Support and evidence-based practice are often interrelated and integrate clinical expertise, patient values and preferences, and the best available clinical research to make decisions and achieve the targeted experiences and outcomes. This approach provides healthcare professionals with timely, effective, and appropriate data for managing the challenges and issues affecting the healthcare environment (Zhao et al., 2023)Evidence-Based Practice In The Healthcare Discussion.  Incorporating this approach in the clinical approach enhances the effectiveness of attaining the desired outcomes. This approach will enable healthcare professionals to make more informed, accurate, and effective decisions concerning the management plan. The synergy between evidence-based practice and clinical decision support often helps to bridge the gap between the underlying clinical practice and evidence-based practices.

Critique and Immediate Warning’s data mining capabilities analyze diverse patient data and help determine the best course of action. Therefore, the healthcare team can aggregate these data sources by interpreting the data from multiple sources; it can uncover insights into the effectiveness of the treatment strategy implemented for diverse patients and populations and help make decisions for managing the client’s needs. For instance, professionals can evaluate the effectiveness of the treatment strategies implemented, determine the potential side effects, and result in the best outcomes for a specific patient population. The data management approach has enabled professionals to establish a safe and effective care approach based on the current evidence, contributing to improved patient care.

The Critique and Data-mining Technology and Quality Improvement

Through the data-mining technique implemented through the Critique and Immediate warning technology, healthcare professionals and stakeholders can identify the most at-risk populations and help relate the patient characteristics and the possible adverse effects that can occur. For instance, in this case, professionals can learn and understand the common clinical conditions most likely to be complicated by specific medications or medical procedures. Therefore, nurses and other healthcare professionals can integrate the best technological advancement that matches the underlying patient needs (Hak et al., 2022)Evidence-Based Practice In The Healthcare Discussion. This tool also allows professional growth and continuous learning by equipping professionals and stakeholders with the knowledge and skills to promote preventative care and ensure that these stakeholders allocate more resources to achieve the desirable outcomes.

With this knowledge, healthcare professionals can incorporate this CDS database and ensure individualized and proactive treatment strategies to enhance the overall experience and ensure that the service delivery approaches are adequate and effective in managing the underlying needs. In this case, professionals can make effective decisions even among patients with complex needs and ensure that resources and opportunities are adequate and effective in attaining desirable outcomes (Lehmann et al., 2023). In this case, professionals can apply the technology to promote medical error prevention rather than only detect and report errors.  Therefore, this technology offers strategies and mechanisms for achieving optimal results, especially when making diverse and complex decisions concerning patient care. Furthermore, it promotes collaboration and coordinated healthcare services and attains safe and efficient care strategies (Solomon et al., 2023).  However, achieving this goal requires adequate training and support systems in healthcare organizations for professionals to achieve the desired outcomes. In this case, professionals should understand the underlying analytical skills to utilize the approach to ensure that the recognizable patterns are adequate and optimal in attaining the targeted outcomes.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM – FREE PAPER HERE

References

Hak, F., Guimarães, T., & Santos, M. (2022). Towards effective clinical decision support systems: A systematic review. PLOS ONE, 17(8). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272846

Lehmann, C. U., & Vignesh Subbian. (2023). Advances in clinical decision support systems: Contributions from the 2022 literature. Yearbook of Medical Informatics, 32(01), 179–183. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1768751

Solomon, J., Dauber-Decker, K., Richardson, S., Levy, S., Khan, S., Coleman, B., Persaud, R., Chelico, J., King, D., Spyropoulos, A., & McGinn, T. (2023). Integrating clinical decision support into electronic health record systems using a novel platform (evidence point): Developmental study. JMIR Formative Research, p. 7, e44065. https://doi.org/10.2196/44065

Zhao, C., Liang, N., Zhang, H., Li, H., Yang, Y., Zong, X., Chen, Y., Wang, Y., & Shi, N. (2023). Harnessing the power of clinical decision support systems: challenges and opportunities. Open Heart, 10(2), e002432–e002432. https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2023-002432 Evidence-Based Practice In The Healthcare Discussion

Discussion Post

Please respond to the following three questions.

• Describe the relationship between EBP and Clinical Decision Support.
• Using Table 19.3 of your text, identify a clinical decision support tool you use frequently in your own clinical practice.
• Using the CDS tool you identified from your own practice, describe how data-mining from the clinical decision support tool can be used to change practice and promote health outcomes.

See attached picture

Thanks for your help Evidence-Based Practice In The Healthcare Discussion