Concepts within the nursing metaparadigm
Criteria for Content
Select one of the two models presented in the week five lesson (either the Person-Centred Nursing Framework, or the Chamberlain Care Model).
1. In a three- to four-page scholarly paper, address the following:
a. Provide a succinct overview of the model you have selected and discuss how the selected model addresses the four concepts within the nursing metaparadigm (person, health, nursing, environment).
b. Discuss how the selected model qualifies as a theoretical framework within the profession of nursing, and its use within the profession.
c. Describe how the chosen model can be applied in the future APN role (education, executive, family nurse practitioner, healthcare policy, or nursing informatics).
Preparing the paper
Submission Requirements
1. Application: Use Microsoft Word 2013™ to create the written assessment.
2. Length: The paper (excluding the title page and reference page) is at least three and no more than fourpages in length.
3. A minimum of four (4) scholarly literature sources must be used.
4. Submission: Submit your file to the Canvas course site by the due date/time indicated.
Best Practices in Preparing the Project
The following are best practices in preparing this project.
1. Review directions thoroughly.
2. Follow submission requirements.
3. Make sure all elements on the grading rubric are included.
4. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed and consistent with formal, scientific writing.
5. Title page, running head, body of paper, and reference page must follow APA guidelines as found in the 6th edition of the manual. This includes the use of headings for each section of the paper except for the introduction where no heading is used.
6. Ideas and information that come from scholarly literature must be cited and referenced correctly.
7. A minimum of four (4) scholarly literature references must be used.
8. Abide by CCN academic integrity policy.
Rubric
NR501 Week 5 Application of Theory Assignment
| NR501 Week 5 Application of Theory Assignment | ||
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction | 18.0 ptsPresentation of information is comprehensive and concise and includes all of the following elements: • Includes general statements on the value of nursing models as a framework for practice. • States the selected model that will be analyzed, and the MSN track to which application will be presented. • Identifies sections of the paper. • Provides citations from scholarly nursing sources.16.0 ptsPresentation of information is superficial and includes all of the following elements: • Includes general statements on the value of nursing models as a framework for practice. • States the selected model that will be analyzed, and the MSN track to which application will be presented. • Identifies sections of the paper. • Provides citations from scholarly nursing sources.14.0 ptsPresentation of information is minimally demonstrated and includes all of the following elements: • Includes general statements on the value of nursing models as a framework for practice. • States the selected model that will be analyzed, and the MSN track to which application will be presented. • Identifies sections of the paper. • Provides citations from scholarly nursing sources.7.0 ptsPresentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations or is missing the following: • Includes general statements on the value of nursing models as a framework for practice. • States the selected model that will be analyzed, and the MSN track to which application will be presented. • Identifies sections of the paper. • Provides citations from scholarly nursing sources.0.0 ptsPresentation of information in two or more of the following elements fail to meet expectations or are missing the following: • Includes general statements on the value of nursing models as a framework for practice. • States the selected model that will be analyzed, and the MSN track to which application will be presented. • Identifies sections of the paper. • Provides citations from scholarly nursing sources. | 18.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOverview of Selected Model | 35.0 ptsPresentation of information is comprehensive and concise and includes all of the following elements: • Selects either the Patient-Centred Nursing (PCN) Framework or the Chamberlain Care Model. • Presents a succinct overview of the selected model. • Discusses the key concepts within the model. • Explain how the model addresses each of the concepts within the metaparadigm (person, health, nursing, environment). • Provides citations from scholarly nursing sources.31.0 ptsPresentation of information is superficial in places and includes all of the following elements: • Selects either the Patient-Centred Nursing (PCN) Framework or the Chamberlain Care Model. • Presents a succinct overview of the selected model. • Discusses the key concepts within the model. • Explain how the model addresses each of the concepts within the metaparadigm (person, health, nursing, environment). • Provides citations from scholarly nursing sources.28.0 ptsPresentation of information is minimally demonstrated and includes all of the following elements: • Selects either the Patient-Centred Nursing (PCN) Framework or the Chamberlain Care Model. • Presents a succinct overview of the selected model. • Discusses the key concepts within the model. • Explain how the model addresses each of the concepts within the metaparadigm (person, health, nursing, environment). • Provides citations from scholarly nursing sources.13.0 ptsPresentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations or is missing the following: • Selects either the Patient-Centred Nursing (PCN) Framework or the Chamberlain Care Model. • Presents a succinct overview of the selected model. • Discusses the key concepts within the model. • Explain how the model addresses each of the concepts within the metaparadigm (person, health, nursing, environment). • Provides citations from scholarly nursing sources.0.0 ptsPresentation of information in two or more following elements fail to meet expectations or are missing the following: • Selects either the Patient-Centred Nursing (PCN) Framework or the Chamberlain Care Model. • Presents a succinct overview of the selected model. • Discusses the key concepts within the model. • Explain how the model addresses each of the concepts within the metaparadigm (person, health, nursing, environment). • Provides citations from scholarly nursing sources. | 35.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAppraisal of the Model as a Nursing Theory | 35.0 ptsPresentation of information is comprehensive and concise and includes all of the following elements: • Explains how the selected model qualifies as a theory to serve as a theoretical framework for nursing practice. • Discusses how the model has been used within the profession. • Provides citations from scholarly sources.31.0 ptsPresentation of information is superficial in places and includes all of the following elements: • Explains how the selected model qualifies as a theory to serve as a theoretical framework for nursing practice. • Discusses how the model has been used within the profession. • Provides citations from scholarly sources.28.0 ptsPresentation of information is minimally demonstrated and includes all of the following elements: • Explains how the selected model qualifies as a theory to serve as a theoretical framework for nursing practice. • Discusses how the model has been used within the profession. • Provides citations from scholarly sources.13.0 ptsPresentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations or is missing the following: • Explains how the selected model qualifies as a theory to serve as a theoretical framework for nursing practice. • Discusses how the model has been used within the profession. • Provides citations from scholarly sources.0.0 ptsPresentation of information in two or more of the following elements fail to meet expectations or are missing the following: • Explains how the selected model qualifies as a theory to serve as a theoretical framework for nursing practice. • Discusses how the model has been used within the profession. • Provides citations from scholarly sources. | 35.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplication of the Model to Advanced Practice Nursing | 35.0 ptsPresentation of information is comprehensive and concise and includes all of the following elements: • Discusses how the model can serve as a theoretical framework to inform and guide practice within your future master’s prepared role (educator, executive, family nurse practitioner, healthcare policy, or nursing informatics). • Includes one specific example which portrays application of the model to practice within your future master’s prepared role (educator, executive, family nurse practitioner, healthcare policy, or nursing informatics). Your example should be substantive, specific, and include a detailed description of how the model would be applied. o The example may come from a published source, or it may be your own creative idea. o Conventions of formal, scholarly writing should be used (do not use first person) • Provides citations from scholarly nursing sources31.0 ptsPresentation of information is superficial in places and includes all of the following elements: • Discusses how the model can serve as a theoretical framework to inform and guide practice within your future master’s prepared role (educator, executive, family nurse practitioner, healthcare policy, or nursing informatics). • Includes one specific example which portrays application of the model to practice within your future master’s prepared role (educator, executive, family nurse practitioner, healthcare policy, or nursing informatics). Your example should be substantive, specific, and include a detailed description of how the model would be applied. o The example may come from a published source, or it may be your own creative idea. o Conventions of formal, scholarly writing should be used (do not use first person) • Provides citations from scholarly nursing sources28.0 ptsPresentation of information is minimally demonstrated and includes all of the following elements: • Discusses how the model can serve as a theoretical framework to inform and guide practice within your future master’s prepared role (educator, executive, family nurse practitioner, healthcare policy, or nursing informatics). • Includes one specific example which portrays application of the model to practice within your future master’s prepared role (educator, executive, family nurse practitioner, healthcare policy, or nursing informatics). Your example should be substantive, specific, and include a detailed description of how the model would be applied. o The example may come from a published source, or it may be your own creative idea. o Conventions of formal, scholarly writing should be used (do not use first person) • Provides citations from scholarly nursing sources13.0 ptsPresentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations or is missing the following: • Discusses how the model can serve as a theoretical framework to inform and guide practice within your future master’s prepared role (educator, executive, family nurse practitioner, healthcare policy, or nursing informatics). • Includes one specific example which portrays application of the model to practice within your future master’s prepared role (educator, executive, family nurse practitioner, healthcare policy, or nursing informatics). Your example should be substantive, specific, and include a detailed description of how the model would be applied. o The example may come from a published source, or it may be your own creative idea. o Conventions of formal, scholarly writing should be used (do not use first person) • Provides citations from scholarly nursing sources0.0 ptsPresentation of information in two or more of the following elements fail to meet expectations or are missing the following: • Discusses how the model can serve as a theoretical framework to inform and guide practice within your future master’s prepared role (educator, executive, family nurse practitioner, healthcare policy, or nursing informatics). • Includes one specific example which portrays application of the model to practice within your future master’s prepared role (educator, executive, family nurse practitioner, healthcare policy, or nursing informatics). Your example should be substantive, specific, and include a detailed description of how the model would be applied. o The example may come from a published source, or it may be your own creative idea. o Conventions of formal, scholarly writing should be used (do not use first person) o Provides citations from scholarly nursing sources | 35.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion | 25.0 ptsPresentation of information is comprehensive and concise and includes all of the following elements: o Concluding summary of the model and its value as a theoretical framework o Proposed application of the model as a framework for practice in the selected master’s prepared role o Self-reflection regarding what was learned from completing this assignment o Writing in the first-person may be included for the self-reflection22.0 ptsPresentation of information is good but superficial in places and includes all of the following elements: o Concluding summary of the model and its value as a theoretical framework o Proposed application of the model as a framework for practice in the selected master’s prepared role o Self-reflection regarding what was learned from completing this assignment o Writing in the first-person may be included for the self-reflection20.0 ptsPresentation of information is minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements: o Concluding summary of the model and its value as a theoretical framework o Proposed application of the model as a framework for practice in the selected master’s prepared role o Self-reflection regarding what was learned from completing this assignment o Writing in the first-person may be included for the self-reflection10.0 ptsPresentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations or is missing the following: o Concluding summary of the model and its value as a theoretical framework o Proposed application of the model as a framework for practice in the selected master’s prepared role o Self-reflection regarding what was learned from completing this assignment o Writing in the first-person may be included for the self-reflection0.0 ptsPresentation of information in two or more of the following elements fails to meet expectations or are missing the following: o Concluding summary of the model and its value as a theoretical framework o Proposed application of the model as a framework for practice in the selected master’s prepared role o Self-reflection regarding what was learned from completing this assignment o Writing in the first-person may be included for the self-reflection | 25.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Format | 18.0 ptsAPA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page; • running head; • body of paper (including citations and headings); and • reference page. One deduction for each type of APA format error. 0 to 1 APA error is present16.0 ptsAPA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page; • running head; • body of paper (including citations and headings); and • reference page. One deduction for each type of APA format error. 2–3 APA errors are present14.0 ptsAPA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page; • running head; • body of paper (including citations and headings); and • reference page. One deduction for each type of APA format error. 4–5 APA errors are present7.0 ptsAPA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page; • running head; • body of paper (including citations and headings); and • reference page. One deduction for each type of APA format error. 6–7 APA errors are present0.0 ptsAPA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page; • running head; • body of paper (including citations and headings); and • reference page. One deduction for each type of APA format error. 8 or greater APA errors are present | 18.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Mechanics | 9.0 pts1–2 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual. For this assignment, first person may be used.8.0 pts3–4 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual. For this assignment, first person may be used.7.0 pts5–6 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual. For this assignment, first person may be used.3.0 pts7–8 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual. For this assignment, first person may be used.0.0 pts9 or greater errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual. For this assignment, first person may be used. | 9.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReferences and Page Length Note: Students are to use at least four (4) scholarly references. The paper (excluding the title page and reference page) should be at least three but no more than four pages. | 0.0 pts3 point deduction if student does not meet these requirements0.0 ptsNo deductions if student meets the requirements | 0.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate Deductions | 0.0 pts0 pts lost – submission met deadline0.0 ptsstudent does not meet the deadline for submission 10% per day up to 30% total (3-days) | 0.0 pts |
| Total Points: 175.0 |
