Nursing homework help

Nursing homework help

Select one condition from the list below:

  • Bipolar Disorder
  • Schizophrenia
  • Dementia (specify what kind of dementia)
  • Addiction (specify the substance)
  • Insomnia

Based on the condition you selected, create a presentation discussing the following information related to the condition selected:

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

  • Prevalence
  • Risk factors
  • Patient presentation
  • Neurobiology (brain structures affected)
  • Neurotransmitters thought to be related
  • Evidence based treatment plan for the condition to include patient education, prognosis, and potential side effects from the medications selected
  • Role of the Psychiatric Nurse practitioner in the management of the condition Nursing homework help

Include a minimum of 4 evidence-based articles to support your presentation that are 5 years old or less.

Please use visuals such as slides, graphics, charts and graphs, etc.

NURS_683_DE – Week 7 Signature Assignment

NURS_683_DE – Week 7 Signature Assignment
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiagnosis definition/ symptoms/ Prevalence; Risk factors
80 pts

Proficient

The descriptions of the diagnosis, prevalence, and risk factors are completely accurate and supported by evidence-based information.

40 pts

Acceptable

The description of the diagnosis, prevalence, and risk factors are somewhat accurate and supported by evidence-based information.

20 pts

Needs Improvement

Missing one element of diagnosis, prevalence, and risk factors.

10.69 pts

Unsatisfactory

Missing more than one element of diagnosis, prevalence, and risk factors.

0 pts

Missing

No discussion of diagnosis, prevalence, or risk factors

80 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePatient presentation/Neurobiology/Related neurotransmitters
80 pts

Proficient

The descriptions of the diagnosis, prevalence, and risk factors are completely accurate and supported by evidence-based information.

40 pts

Acceptable

The description of the diagnosis, prevalence, and risk factors are somewhat accurate and supported by evidence-based information.

20 pts

Needs Improvement

Missing one element of diagnosis, prevalence, and risk factors.

10.69 pts

Unsatisfactory

Missing more than one element of diagnosis, prevalence, and risk factors.

0 pts

Missing

No discussion of diagnosis, prevalence, or risk factors

80 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvidence based treatment plan: Includes patient education, prognosis, and potential side effects and the role of the PMHNP.
70 pts

Proficient

Provides evidence based information for all 4 required topics.

35 pts

Acceptable

Provides evidence based information for 3 required topics.

17.5 pts

Needs Improvement

Provides evidence based information for 2 required topics.

9.35 pts

Unsatisfactory

Provides evidence based information for 1 required topic.

0 pts

Missing

No treatment plan or discussion for the role of the PMHNP is discussed.

70 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeVideo presentation
60 pts

Proficient

Completes a 3–5-minute video explaining information with all required details. Presentation is effective (content, rate, clarity).

30 pts

Acceptable

Completes a 3–5-minute video explaining all required information. Presentation mostly effective (content, rate, clarity).

15 pts

Needs Improvement

Completes a 3–5-minute video explaining required information. OR Presentation vague or ineffective (content, rate, clarity).

8.02 pts

Unsatisfactory

Completes a 2–4-minute video explaining required information. OR Presentation vague or audio unclear.

0 pts

Missing

Presentation missing. Presentation less than 2 minutes. OR Video presentation does not work.

60 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReferences
10 pts

Proficient

Provides at least 4 evidence-based references that support the information in the video.

5 pts

Acceptable

Provides at least 3 evidence-based references that do not clearly support the information in the video.

2.5 pts

Needs Improvement

Provides at least 2 references that are not evidence-based or do not support the information in the video.

1.34 pts

Unsatisfactory

Provides at least 1 reference that is not evidence-based or does not support the information in the video.

0 pts

Missing

No references provided to support information.

10 pts
Total Points: 300

 

Writing For Nursing And Health Care Profession

Writing For Nursing And Health Care Profession

Module 5/ Writing for Nurses.

Review alphanumeric outlines at https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/purdue_owl.html

Remember when you are creating an outline that each heading MUST have a minimum of two (2) subheadings.  The rationale lies in the thinking that if you cannot think of at least two items to flesh out a specific heading then the information in that one subheading is really part of the topic in the heading. Writing For Nursing And Health Care Profession

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

  1. Introduction to topic
    II. Topic:  Abuse of alcohol and opioids can affect individuals economically, physically, and emotionally
  2. Economically
    1. Alcohol
  3. Cost to buy alcohol
    b. Cost of legal proceedings
    c. Cost of property damage
  4. Opioids
  5. Cost of legal prescriptions
    b. Cost of illegal purchases
    c. Cost of legal proceedings
  6. Physical effects
    1. Alcohol
  7. Poor nutrition
    b. Liver damage
    c. Depression
  8. Opioids
  9. Infection from use of dirty needles
    b. Tolerance and dependence
    c. Depression
  10. Emotional effects

lll. Next topic, etc.

.

Selecting Credible Sources

University of California San Diego Department of Psychology. (2018). What types of references are appropriate? https://psychology.ucsd.edu/undergraduate-program/undergraduate-resources/academic-writing-resources/writing-research-papers/appropriate-references.html Writing For Nursing And Health Care Profession

University of Maryland. (2018). Is my source credible?  http://sites.umuc.edu/library/libhow/credibility.cfm

Writing for Nurses/Module 5 Outline directions.

Overview:

Creating an outline of a paper assists the author in organizing the content of the paper.  It allows the author the opportunity to discover what ideas fit together well and which ones need additional clarification.  The more detailed the outline the easier it will be to write the final paper.

Review first sample outline at https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/purdue_owl.html

  • Use Roman numerals for the main headings in the outline (I, II, III, IV)
    • Capital letters are used for the subheadings (A, B, C, D)
    • If another set of subheadings is needed use 1, 2, 3, 4
    • The next subheading would be lowercase letters, e.g., a, b, c, d

Note: There can be no fewer than two (2) subheadings beneath any heading. See the example in the Instructional Materials folder for Module 5.

 

Instructions

  1. You are to create an alphanumeric outline of the final paper.
  2. Main headings will include one heading titled Introduction and one titled Conclusion.  Other main headings will address major concepts in your thinking.
  3. The outline is to provide the logical progression of the ideas and points you will make in the final paper. Items do not need to be in complete sentences.
  4. The outline is to have at least two (2) peer reviewed references.  You do NOT need to include in-text citations in the outline, but you will need to include a reference list on a separate page to give credit to the original author of the information. References MUST be in proper APA Manual 7th edition
  5. Include a properly formatted student APA Manual 7th edition title page Writing For Nursing And Health Care Profession

 

  • Click on the link titled ” M5 A1: OUTLINE OF FINAL PAPER – SUBMISSION AREA” to submit the assignment.
  • Refer to Rubric for evaluation guidelines
  • Points: 20
  • Due: See Course Calendar/Checklist

Note: You will have three (3) attempts to submit a written assignment, only the final attempt will be graded. For each attempt you will receive a SafeAssign originality report. This will give you a chance to correct the assignment based on the SafeAssign score. Click here to view instructions on how to interpret your SafeAssign originality report.

Kindly note: If a submission has been made for more than 48 hours without a re-submission, it will be considered final and will be subject to being graded.

 

 

Nutrition Feeding and Eating

Nutrition Feeding and Eating

ATI #3:Skills ModuleGuidelines: Nutrition Feeding and Eating

PURPOSE:

To encourage critical thinking, problem solving, and collaboration through the use of evidence-based practice (EBP) studies.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

COURSE OUTCOMES:

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes.

  1. Examine the sources of knowledge that contribute to professional nursing practice.
  2. Apply research principles to the interpretation of the content of published research studies.
  3. Identify ethical issues common to research involving human subjects.
  4. Evaluate published nursing research for credibility and clinical significance related to evidence-based practice.
  5. Recognize the role of research findings in evidence-based practice. Nutrition Feeding and Eating

 

 

TOTAL POSSIBLE POINTS:150 Points

 

 

“Turnitin” Percentage

  • Less than 25 percentage: Acceptable percentage.
  • Turnitin Draft Submission Box
    • Submit your draft of paper into Turnitin Draft Submission Box to check your percentage as many times as needed before you submit your final paper to designated Unit.
  • If your Final paper has 25% or higher percentage, you must revise/modify your paper contents BEFOREthe paper due date and time.
  • If your Final paper has 25% or higher percentage AT/AFTER you submit your final paper due date and time, Academic Integrity Violation Procedures will be initiated:
  • Academic Integrity Violation letter will be sent to student
  • Assignment Grade will be 0 point
  • The violation case will be reviewed and a further sanction will be determined by the Administrators.

 

 

 

 

Directions and Assignment Criteria

There are five main topics and five associated topics related to each main topic.

  • Select ONE main topic.
  • Search for ONEPrimary Research study for the selected main topic and get approved by Professor. Submit to Canvas shell after approval
  • Review article to summarize the required information Nutrition Feeding and Eating

 

TOPIC 1: Evaluating Nutritional Status: What methods can be used to assess nutritional status?

Example Studies:

  • Formative evaluation of the feedback components of Children’s and Adolescent’s Nutrition Assessment and Advice on the Web (CANAA-W) among parents of schoolchildren.
  • Validation of the Diet Quality Index for adolescents by comparison with biomarkers, nutrient and food intakes: the HELENA study

 

TOPIC 2: Identifying those at risk for malnutrition: What methods can be used to identify those at risk for malnutrition?

Example Studies:

  • Beyond malnutrition screening: Appropriate methods to guide nutrition care for aged care residents
  • Population-specific short-form mini nutritional assessment with body mass index or calf circumference can predict risk of malnutrition in community-living or institutionalized elderly people in Taiwan
  • Comparison of prevalence of malnutrition diagnosis in head and neck, gastrointestinal and lung cancer patients by three classification methods

 

TOPIC 3: Malnutrition associated with specific health conditions: What specific health conditions increase the risk of malnutrition?

Example Studies:

  • Malnutrition in a sample of community-dwelling people with Parkinson’s disease.
  • Nutritional risk index as a predictor of postoperative wound complications after gastrectomy.
  • Risk of malnutrition is associated with mental health symptoms in community living elderly men and women: the Tromso Study.

 

TOPIC 4: Outcomes associated with nutritional status: What associations exist between nutritional status and health outcomes?

Example Studies:

  • Role of nutritional status in predicting quality of life outcomes in cancer – a systematic review of the literature
  • Nutritional support for liver disease Nutrition Feeding and Eating

 

TOPIC 5: Interventions to improve nutritional status: What type of interventions improve adherence to recommendations on nutritional intake?

Example Study:

  • Interventions to enhance adherence to dietary advice for preventing and managing chronic diseases in adults.

 

WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT:

  • Read the study and answer the required questions for each category
  • Must write the paper using provided Summary Paper Formaton page #3.
  • Grading Rubric/Description on page 4-5

 

ATI #3: Skills Module Contents: Summary Paper Format

  • Bold for each Heading and Subheading
  • Include in-text citations for all information/contents as needed
  • Summary paper MUST be written in this format

 

Introduction and Key Points

Chosen Topics and Question

  • Select one topic and question from five main topic list

 

Define the Topic and Question

  • How do you interpret and/or understand the topic and question you selected?

 

Overview/Significance of Problem

  • Describe Overview and Significance of Problem of the topic and question you selected
  • Include in-text citations

 

Article Search

Current and credible resources:List Chamberlain library Database(s) used

 

Database search-terms and refinement methods

 

Number of articles located

 

List additional sources outside of ATI module:List all sources you used for article search outside of ATI (CDC, American Diabetic Association, etc.)

 

Article Findings

Why was this article chosen?

 

How it addresses the topic?State the “Purpose/Aim of Study” as the author stated in article

 

Type of Research conducted:

  • Quantitative, Qualitative, Descriptive, or Mixed-Method study?
  • Briefly describe what was done (sample, methods, measurement tools used)

 

Findings of Research: Comprehensively describe ALLFindings in the article (participant characteristics and Results of Study).

 

Evidence for Practice

Summary of Evidence

  • Briefly summarize the overall purpose and findings of the research.

 

How will this evidence improve current practice?

  • Briefly describe what the current practice is.
  • Describe how this evidence improve current practice?

 

How will this evidence decrease a gap in current practice?

  • Briefly describe difference between the current knowledge, skills, competence, practice, performance or patient outcomes and the ideal or desirable state
  • Describe how this evidence decrease a gap in the practice?

 

Any concerns or weaknesses in the evidence/finding? (Found in Discussion)

 

 

Sharing of Evidence

Who would you share the information with?(colleagues, other disciplines, patients, families)

 

 

How would you share this information?(in-services, online education modules, health fair for patients, educate healthcare professionals)

 

 

What resources would you need to accomplish this sharing of evidence?

  • List resources you may need for sharing the evidence as you stated in above 2 questions (who and how) (i.e. administrator, manager, support for materials, etc.)

 

Why would it be important to share this evidence with the nursing profession?

 

 

Conclusion

  • Summarizes the Theme of Paper, Findings, and Key points.
  • Do NOT include Conclusion/Implication on the article

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assignment Criteria Points % Description
Pick one of the topics and answer the topic question along with providing a current research article, which supports this question, and 300-word summary. The Summary must include the following headings (See rubric for criteria under each heading):

a.       Introduction and Key Points (10 points)

b.      Article Search (25 points)

c.       Article Findings (25 points)

d.      Evidence of Practice (25 points)

e.       Sharing of Evidence (25 points)

f.       Conclusion (20 points)

g.      APA style (10 points)

h.      Writing mechanics (10 points)

150 100 Student grades will be based on completing ALL criteria listed and according to the rubric. Please see rubric for specific requirement to achieve full points for this assignment
Total 150 100  

 

GRADING RUBRIC

Headings Points for Each Heading
Heading 1 10 points 7.5 pts 5 pts 2.5 pts 0 pts
Introduction and Key points All 4 criteria met:

1)   Choose one of assigned Topics and Question

2)   Defines the Topic and Question

3)   States why it is a problem

4)   Information presented in logical sequence

3 of 4 criteria met 2 of 4 criteria met 1 of 4 criteria met Not done
Heading 2 25 points 20 pts 15 pts 10 pts 0 pts
Article Search All 4 criteria met:

1)   Current and credible resource

2)   Database search-terms and refinement methods

3)   Number of articles located

4)   Source outside of ATI module

3 of 4 criteria met 2 of 4 criteria met 1 of 4 criteria met Not done
Heading 3 25 points 20 pts 15 pts 10 pts 0 pts
Article Finding All 4 criteria met:

1)   How it addresses the topic (purpose)

2)   Type of research conducted (and include sample, methods)

3)   Findings of research

4)   Why this article chosen

3 of 4 criteria met 2 of 4 criteria met 1 of 4 criteria met Not done
Heading 4 25 points 20 pts 15 pts 10 pts 0 pts
Evidence for Practice All 4 criteria met:

1)   Summary of evidence

2)   How it will improve practice

3)   How will this evidence decrease a gap to practice

4)   Any concerns or weaknesses located in the evidence

3 of 4 criteria met 2 of 4 criteria met 1 of 4 criteria met Not done
Heading 5 25 points 20 pts 15 pts 10 pts 0 pts
Sharing of Evidence All 4 criteria met:

1)    Who would you share the information with?

2)    How would you share this information?

3)    What resources would you need to accomplish this sharing of evidence?

4)    Why would it be important to share this evidence with the nursing profession

3 of 4 criteria met 2 of 4 criteria met 1 of 4 criteria met Not done
Heading 6 20 points 15 pts 10 pts 5 pts 0 pts
Conclusion All 4 criteria met:

1)   Summarizes the theme of the paper

2)   Information presented in logical sequence

3)   All key points addressed

4)   Conclusion shows depth of understanding

3 of 4 criteria met 2 of 4 criteria met 1 of 4 criteria met Not done
Heading 7 10 points 7.5 pts 5 pts 2.5 pts 0 pts
APA Style All 4 criteria met:

1)   APA style used properly for citations

2)   APA style used properly for reference

3)   APA style used properly for quotations

4)   All references are cited, and all citations have references

3 of 4 criteria met 2 of 4 criteria met 1 of 4 criteria met Not done
Heading 8 10 points 7.5 pts 5 pts 2.5 pts 0 pts
Writing mechanics All 4 criteria met:

1)   No spelling errors

2)   No grammatical errors, including verb sentence and word usage

3)   No writing errors, including sentence structure, and formatting

4)   Must be all original work

3 of 4 criteria met 2 of 4 criteria met 1 of 4 criteria met Not done
Total 150 Points Score =

 

 

 

 

 

Nursing homework help

Nursing homework help

 

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

  • With regard to the Episodic note case study provided:
    • Review this week’s Learning Resources, and consider the insights they provide about the case study.
    • Consider what history would be necessary to collect from the patient in the case study.
    • Consider what physical exams and diagnostic tests would be appropriate to gather more information about the patient’s condition. How would the results be used to make a diagnosis?
    • Identify at least five possible conditions that may be considered in a differential diagnosis for the patient. Nursing homework help

The Assignment

  1. Analyze the subjective portion of the note. List additional information that should be included in the documentation.
  2. Analyze the objective portion of the note. List additional information that should be included in the documentation.
  3. Is the assessment supported by the subjective and objective information? Why or why not?
  4. What diagnostic tests would be appropriate for this case, and how would the results be used to make a diagnosis?
  5. Would you reject/accept the current diagnosis? Why or why not? Identify three possible conditions that may be considered as a differential diagnosis for this patient. Explain your reasoning using at least three different references from current evidence-based literature. Nursing homework help

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In this Assessment, you will analyze an Episodic Note case study that describes abnormal findings in patients seen in a clinical setting. You will consider what history should be collected from the patients, as well as which physical exams and diagnostic tests should be conducted. You will also formulate a differential diagnosis with several possible conditionsJust add in what you want to this case to make it unique to you. Do not use NA or normal.

ABDOMINAL ASSESSMENT

Subjective:

 

  • CC: “My stomach hurts, I have diarrhea and nothing seems to help.” Nursing homework help

 

  • HPI: JR, 47 yo WM, complains of having generalized abdominal pain that started 3 days ago. He has not taken any medications because he did not know what to take. He states the pain is a 5/10 today but has been as much as 9/10 when it first started. He has been able to eat, with some nausea afterwards.

 

  • PMH: HTN, Diabetes, hx of GI bleed 4 years ago

 

  • Medications: Lisinopril 10mg, Amlodipine 5 mg, Metformin 1000mg, Lantus 10 units qhs

 

  • Allergies: NKDA

 

  • FH: No hx of colon cancer, Father hx DMT2, HTN, Mother hx HTN, Hyperlipidemia, GERD

 

  • Social: Denies tobacco use; occasional etoh, married, 3 children (1 girl, 2 boys)

 

Objective:

 

  • VS: Temp 99.8; BP 160/86; RR 16; P 92; HT 5’10”; WT 248lbs

 

  • Heart: RRR, no murmurs

 

  • Lungs: CTA, chest wall symmetrical

 

  • Skin: Intact without lesions, no urticaria

 

  • Abd: soft, hyperactive bowel sounds, pos pain in the LLQ

 

  • Diagnostics: ?

 

Assessment:

  • Left lower quadrant pain

 

  • Gastroenteritis

PLAN:

Name: Tina Jones

Section:

 

Week 4                

Shadow Health Digital Clinical Experience Health History Documentation

 

SUBJECTIVE DATA: Include what the patient tells you, but organize the information.

 

Chief Complaint (CC):

History of Present Illness (HPI):

Medications:

Allergies:

Past Medical History (PMH):

Past Surgical History (PSH):

Sexual/Reproductive History:

Personal/Social History:

Immunization History:

Health Maintenance:

Significant Family History (Include history of parents, maternal/paternal Grandparents, siblings, and children):

 

Review of Systems: From head-to-toe, include each system that covers the Chief Complaint, History of Present Illness, and History).Remember that the information you include in this section is based on what the patient tells you. To ensure that you include all essentials in your case, refer to Chapter 2 of the Sullivan text.

 

General: Include any recent weight changes, weakness, fatigue, or fever, but do not restate HPI data here.

                HEENT:

Neck:

                Breasts:

                Respiratory:

                Cardiovascular/Peripheral Vascular:

                Gastrointestinal:

                Genitourinary:

                Musculoskeletal:

                Psychiatric:

                Neurological:

                Skin:

                Hematologic:

                Endocrine:

 

Nursing homework help

Nursing homework help

Diversity: Module 3..

Textbook:

Andrews, M. M., Boyle, J. S., & Collins, J.W., (2020). Transcultural concepts in nursing care (8th ed.). Wolters Kluwer/LWW. Nursing homework help

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

  • Chapters 7 and 8

Ackley, B.J., Ludwig, G.B,,  Flynn Makic, M.B., Martinez-Ktatz, M., &Zanotti, M.  (2020). Nursing process, clinical reasoning, nursing diagnosis, and evidence-based nursing. In Nursing Diagnosis Handbook: An Evidence-Based Guide to Planning Care (12th ed.). Mosby.

  • Pages 1-15

Click here to download the article

You can read pages 1 – 15 at the following url: (no option to print and save). Click on “Look Inside Nursing homework help

.

Journal Articles:

Marcelin, J.R., Siraj, D.S., Victor, R., Kotadia, S., & Maldonado, Y.A.   (2019). The impact of unconscious bias in healthcare: How to recognize and mitigate it. The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 220(2), S62-S73. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiz214

.

Click here to download the article.

..

.

Narayan, M.C. (2018). How to provide “Culturally Competent Care”. Home Healthcare Now,

36(1), 60. https://doi.org/10.1097/NHH.0000000000000639

.

Click here to download the article

Diversity/Module3

Journal Article:

Narayan, M.C. (2018). How to provide “Culturally Competent Care”. Home Healthcare Now, 36(1). DOI:10.1097/NHH.0000000000000639

Click here to download the article.

Guiding Questions: 

Use the questions below to help focus your attention on your reading assignments.

  1. How does culture influence adult development?
  1. What are the influences of culture on caregiving in the African American culture?
  1. How does gender and specific religious beliefs and practices influence health and illness during crisis or transitions?
  1. How does socioeconomic factors, including income level, influence the interactions of older adults?
  1. What nursing interventions are based on the patients’ cultural values and individual preferences?
  1. What is the importance of cultural values, beliefs and practices related to mental health nursing care?
  1. How do you make a nursing diagnosis and directions on how to plan nursing care?  Nursing homework help

 

Nursing Diagnosis Website

https://nurseslabs.com/nursing-diagnosis/#h-problem-focused-nursing-diagnosis

Diversity/ Module 3 DB

Overview

For this discussion, first, read chapter 7 in your textbook, Transcultural Concepts in Nursing Care.

Use the Critical Thinking Activity #5 on page 234 in your textbook to respond to the following questions:

  1. Explain the difference between gang membership in El Salvador and the United States.
  1. What are the cultural factors that are important to consider when you are planning nursing care for a patient like Jose?
  1. For an example, how do you view body tattoos?
  1. What are the issues related to political asylum, immigration, and the like?
  1. How would you assist Jose to meet his developmental needs?
  1. What might be the problems he will encounter in the U.S. society?
  1. What might be the problems he will encounter in the U.S. healthcare system?

Points: 30

Due Dates:

  • Initial Post: Fri, April 8 by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Standard Time (EST) of the US.
  • Response Post: Sun, April 10 by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Standard Time (EST) of the US – (the response posts cannot be done on the same day as the initial post).

References:

  • Initial Post: Minimum of two (2) total references: one (1) from required course materials and one (1) from peer-reviewed references.
  • Response posts: Minimum of one (1) total reference: one (1) from peer-reviewed or course materials reference per response.

Words Limits

  • Initial Post: Minimum 200 words excluding references (approximately one (1) page)
  • Response posts: Minimum 100 words excluding references.

 

Note: Since it is difficult to edit the APA reference in the Blackboard discussion area, you can copy and paste APA references from your Word document to the Blackboard discussion area.  Points will not be deducted because of format changes in spacing.

 

Instructions

To be successful, complete the following steps in order:

STEP 1. Review the overview.

STEP 2. Click here to download the rubric.

STEP 3. Create a new Word document, type your initial post.

STEP 4. Copy the initial post from the Word document.

STEP 5. Click on “DISCUSSIONS” section located on the left-hand side of your screen in Blackboard.

STEP 6. Post in the discussion forum titled “M3 A5 DB: BIAS AND STEREOTYPING”

 

Got questions? Please post them to the ‘QUESTION & ANSWER FORUM’ in Blackboard. Nursing homework help

 

Analyzing Published Research Articles (IAPRA) Paper

Analyzing Published ResearchArticles (IAPRA) Paper

Individual: Analyzing Published Research Articles (IAPRA) Paper

Purpose

  • The purpose of this paper is to interpret the article as most relevant to the group topic.
  • Use the approved primary research article from your ITSS paper, which is relevant to your group topic and research question. Analyzing Published Research Articles (IAPRA) Paper

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

CO 2: Apply research principles to the interpretation of the content of published research studies (PO#4&8).

CO 4: Evaluate published nursing research for credibility and clinical significance related to evidence-based

practice (PO#4&8).

 

Due Date (please see course calendar for specific dates/times)

  • The Late Assignment Policy applies to this assignment.

 

Points Possible: 200Points

 

Paper Preparation:

  • It is NOT acceptable to use bullet-points in the body of text review paper.
  • All review contents must be PARAPHRASED with your OWN wordswith in-text citations.
  • It is NOT acceptable to QUOTE article contents EXCEPT the Purpose of Studyas required.

 

  • Paper must include all required APA-Style/Format
  • Do NOT leave blank for any of these review elements.
  • Any review element left blank will get 0 point: If authors did not provide information or it was not applicable for certain elements, make note such as “No information was given” or “Not applicable” Analyzing Published Research Articles (IAPRA) Paper

 

 

PLAGIARISM:“Turnitin”Percentage

  • Less than 25 percentage: Acceptable percentage.
  • Turnitin Draft Submission Box
    • Submit your draft of paper into Turnitin Draft Submission Box to check your percentageas many times as needed before you submit your final paper to designated Unit.
  • If your Final paper has 25% or higher percentage, you must revise/modify your paper contents BEFORE you submit your paper due date and time.
  • If your Final paper has 25% or higher percentageAT/AFTERyou submit your final paper due date and time, Academic IntegrityViolation Procedures will be initiated

 

Academic Integrity Violation Procedure

  • Academic Integrity Violation letter will be sent to student
  • Assignment Grade will be 0 point
  • The violation case will be reviewed, and a further sanction will be determined by the Administrators Analyzing Published Research Articles (IAPRA) Paper

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Individual Analyzing Published ResearchArticle (IAPRA)

 

Part I: Research Question, Purpose, Variables and Participants

Research Question

  • Clearly and concisely statesyour group research question as formulated in PICO format.

 

Purpose of the Study

  • Describe the purpose/aim of the study as the author stated in the article: may cut & paste
  • Do NOT change or modify the purpose statement on the article

 

Variables

  • Identify study variables from theabove stated Purpose of Study
  • Quantitative Study: Dependent & Independent VariablesORDescriptive, Qualitative Study: Variables of Interest

 

Participants

  • Enrollment: How did they recruit/enroll eligible participants in the study?

 

  • Inclusion & Exclusion Criteria: Describe Inclusion & Exclusion Criteria

 

  • Total Participant Numbers:Total numbers of participants in the study

 

 

Intervention Procedures/Obtaining Information Procedures

Quantitative Study

Intervention/TreatmentGroup

  • Describe the intervention contents given to Intervention group
  • Describe how the contents were given to Intervention group
  • Identify the person who provided Intervention contents to Intervention group

 

Control Group: If the study has Control Group

  • Describe the contents given to Control group
  • Describe how the contents were given to Control group
  • Identify the person who provided contents to Control group

OR

Descriptive/Qualitative Study:Obtaining Information Procedure

  • Describe the detailed procedure for obtaining information/data (i.e. made appointment to meet each participant,visited home/met in clinical setting……etc)

 

Part II:Data Collection Procedures &Measurement Tools/Instruments

  • Describe ALL methods to collect data in detail (i.e. interview, survey, observation……etc.)
  • Describe each measurement tool/instrument used to measure/assess outcomes in the study in detail.

 

Results/Findings

Participant Characteristics/Sociodemographic Findings

  • Describe participant characteristics or sociodemographic status
  • Must be objective, descriptive, and comprehensive
  • Must describe the findings of Tables/Figures to provide comprehensive information about participant characteristics as article provided.

 

Study Results/Findings

  • Describe ALLOther Results/Findingsbesides above participant characteristics in detail.
    • Each result item may include Headings/Subheadings as the article provided.
    • Do NOT simply saying “pain level was decreased,” “adherence was increased”…etc
    • Do NOT include contents from Discussion and/or Conclusion in the article.

 

Part III: Synthesis of Findings

Synthesis of Findings

  • Describe the Rationale/Mechanism for how/why Finding of each intervention/factor helps your Research Question (e. how/what mechanism does music therapy help pain, how does sucking stimulation increase oral intake for pre-term infants)
  • Should NOT repeat same contents you had on Findings section and/or article
  • May include citations from other sources for above-described rationale/mechanism (i.e. textbooks, CDC…etc)

 

Nursing Implications

  • How the nurses can implement the research findings into nursing practice.

 

Group Article Summary Table (All group members)

  • Describe each group member’s article on Research Article Summary Table.
  • Use bullet points for each category.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Grading Rubric&Description for IAPRA

Part I (80)
Research Question 5 ·  Accurately/Clearly states group’s Research Question as your group formulated
Purpose of Study 5 · Describe the purpose of the study as the author stated in the article.

§ Do NOT change or modify the statement on the article

Variables 10

 

 

·  Identify study variables from the above stated Purpose of Study

§ Quantitative Study: Dependent & Independent variables

OR

§ Descriptive, Qualitative Study: Variables of Interest

Participants 5

 

5

5

·  Enrollment: How did they recruit eligible participants in the study?

·  Eligibility: Describe Inclusion & Exclusion Criteria

·  Numbers: Total numbers of participants in the study

Intervention Procedures

 

 

 

 

 

 

Obtaining Information Procedures

 

 

35 Quantitative Study:

·   Intervention Group: Describe the detailed Intervention contents, procedures, and person who provided Intervention for Intervention group.

·   Control Group: Describe the detailed contents, procedures, and person who provided contents for Control group

OR

Descriptive Study:

·  Describe the detailed procedure for obtaining information/data (i.e. made appointment to meet each participant, visited home/met clinical……etc)

Format 10 Followed APA format for paper and in-text citations
Part II (75)
Data Collection

 

Measurement Tools

5

 

25

·  Describe ALL data collection methods in detail (i.e. survey, interview, observation)

·  Describe each measurement tool/instrument used to measure study outcomes in detail.

Participant Characteristics/Sociodemographic Findings

 

 

 

All other Results/Findings

10

 

 

 

 

 

25

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

·   Must be descriptive and comprehensive

·   Describe participant characteristics or sociodemographic findings

·   Describe the findings of Tables/Figures to provide comprehensive information about participant characteristics as article provided

 

 

·   Describe ALL Other Results/Findings besides above participant characteristics in the article in detail for each Result item

·    Each Result item may include Headings/Subheadings of Results as the article provided.

·    Do NOT simply saying “pain level was decreased,” “adherence was increased” – provide numbers or % if available

·    Do NOT include contents from Discussion and/or Conclusion in the article.

Format 10 ·   Followed APA format for paper and in-text citations
 

Part III (45)

Synthesis of Findings

 

10 ·   Describe the Rationale for how/why Finding of each intervention/factor helps your Research Question (i.e. how or by what mechanism doesmusic therapy help pain? How does sucking stimulation increase oral intake for pre-term infants?)

·   Should NOT repeat same contents you had on Findings section and/or article

·   Should have citation of analyzed article(s)

·   May include citations from other sources for above described rationale and mechanism (i.e. textbooks, CDC…etc)

Nursing Implication 7 ·   How can nurses implement the research findings into nursing practice?
Format 3 ·  Followed APA format for paper, in-text citation, references.
Article Summary Table (Group) 25 ·  Describe article on Research Article Summary Table

·  Use bullet points for each column in the Table

·  Submit Table as separate document

 

Total Points: 200 Points

 

 

Care Plan Essay

Care Plan Essay

Diversity/ The Nursing Process: Care Plan

Overview

This week you will learn how to plan care for patients while considering their diverse cultural backgrounds. This is a care plan, not an APA paper. However, you will still need to have references for the diagnoses, implementation and rationale sections. Be sure to format your citations and references in 7th ed. APA format.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

For this assessment, first, read chapter 8 in your textbook, Transcultural Concepts in Nursing Care and Ludwig, G.B, et al. (2020). Nursing process, clinical reasoning, nursing diagnosis, and evidence-based nursing. In Nursing diagnosis handbook: An evidence-based guide to planning care. 12th ed. (pp. 1-15)

Follow the directions carefully.

  1. Select one (1) of the Case Studies found in Chapter 8:
  1. Case Study 8-1 (pg. 246)
  2. Case Study 8-2 (pg. 248)
  3. Case Study 8-3 (pg. 248)
  1. Click here to download the Care Plan template to document your assessment, diagnosis, planning goals, implementation, rationale and the evaluation of your goals.
  1. You must have two nursing diagnoses.  Be sure one of your nursing diagnoses deals with the culturally diverse needs.
  1. Put your 7th ed. APA formatted references on the second page of your care plan and be sure your citations are 7th ed. APA formatted.

.

Due Date: Sun, April 10 by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Standard Time (EST) of the US

.

Point Value: 40

.

Instructions:

.

To be successful, complete the following steps in order:

.

.

STEP 1. Review the above overview.

.

STEP 2: Click here to download the rubric.

.

STEP 3: Save the document with the filename: “Lastname_Firstname_M3_A6” (Example: Smith_Jill_M3_A6.docx).

.

STEP 4. Submit the document by clicking the link on the left titled “M3 A6 WA: SUBMISSION AREA – NURSING PROCESS CARE PLAN”

.

.

Note: You will have three (3) attempts to submit a written assignment, only the final attempt will be graded. Kindly note, if a submission has been made for more than 48 hours without a re-submission, it will be considered final and will be subject to being graded. For each attempt you will receive a SafeAssign originality report. This will give you a chance to correct the assignment based on the SafeAssign score. Click here to view instructions on how to interpret your SafeAssign originality report.

 

Nursing homework help

Nursing homework help

As you will learn throughout the program, the diagnosis of a variety of psychiatric illnesses is not always an easy or straightforward process. Multiple observations and assessment methods are often employed to reach a diagnosis. This approach can include the use of standardized assessment instruments.  This then aids you in defining a treatment plan and choosing specific treatment plans to use in the care of your clients.  Nursing homework help

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

You are tasked with identifying a standardized assessment instrument/tool to measure the disorders listed for each week. You will keep these instruments in the form of a “portfolio” that you can use in your clinical practice to assess clients who present with a variety of symptoms.

Instructions:

Instrument/ Tool criteria:

For each assessment, you are tasked with selecting, you will identify an instrument and:

  1. List what DSM diagnosis the tool/instrument is used for.
  2. Identify an assessment/diagnosis instrument.
  3. Appraise a scholarly, peer-reviewed article that addresses the use of the instrument to support your choice as an evidence-based instrument for practice.
  4. Evaluate the instrument’s appropriateness for diagnosing the condition it is designed to assess or if the developers of the instrument reported that the instrument is only part of a comprehensive assessment for the disorder.
  5. Describe whether or not the instrument can be used to measure patient response to therapy/treatment or if it is strictly for assessment and diagnosis.
  6. Discuss the psychometrics/scoring of the instrument, including reliability and validity.
  7. Discuss any limitations associated with the use of the instrument.
  8. Include a link to view the assessment if possible.

Student Example Anxiety and Related Disorders

Week 7

 

Instrument: Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN)

 

Article: Psychometric properties of the Social Phobia Inventory

 

Appropriateness for Dx: This tool is meant for screening of individuals with social phobia and assignment of a severity score (Connor et al., 2000). The tool was created in congruence with DSM-4 but is consistent with the DSM-5 diagnosis of social anxiety disorder, minus some minor changes (Substance Abuse and Mental Health Service Administration [SAMHSA], 2016). Although the study is outdated, Duke University School of Medicine (2020) acknowledges that the tool is still relevant and utilized by their Anxiety and Traumatic Stress Program. Nursing homework help

 

Response to Therapy/Treatment: The SPIN is appropriate for testing treatment response and through studies has proven sensitive to symptom changes over time. Changes in scores are able to determine treatment efficiency (Connor et al., 2000).

 

Psychometrics: The tool is self-administered and consists of 17 separate statements regarding problems a patient may exhibit if they have social phobia. The statement is then rated on how much it has bothered the individual in the last week, from ‘not at all’ (0) to ‘extremely’ (4). Any score over 21 is considered clinically significant. In the study, the assessment tool was able to effectively separate individuals with and without social phobia. Validity is strong in regard to detecting the severity of illness and is sensitive to symptom reductions during treatment. The scale shows significant correlation with the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale Test, The Brief Social Phobia Scale and The Fear Questionnaire social phobia subscale (Connor et al., 2000).

 

Limitations: Limitations exist in the tool’s alignment with DSM-4 instead of the more recent edition, although differences are very minor (SAMHSA, 2016). With a cutoff score of 19, sensitivity and specificity were good, but some individuals consider the cutoff score to be 15, in which these measures are weaker (Connor et al., 2000). Nursing homework help

 

References

 

Connor, K., Davidson, J., Churchill, E., Sherwood, A., Foa, E., & Wisler, R. (2000).

Psychometric properties of the Social Phobia Inventory. British Journal of Psychiatry, 176, 379-386.

 

Case Study SOAP Note

Case Study SOAP Note

ABDOMINAL ASSESSMENT Case Study SOAP Note

 

Subjective:

  • CC: “My stomach hurts, I have diarrhea, and nothing seems to help.”
  • HPI: JR, 47 y/o WM, complains of having generalized abdominal pain that started 3 days ago. He has not taken any medications because he did not know what to take. He states the pain is a 5/10 today but has been as much as 9/10 when it first started. He has been able to eat, with some nausea afterwards.
  • PMH: HTN, Diabetes, hx of GI bleed 4 years ago
  • Medications: Lisinopril 10mg, Amlodipine 5 mg, Metformin 1000mg, Lantus 10 units QHS
  • Allergies: NKDA
  • FH: No hx of colon cancer, Father hx DMT2, HTN, Mother hx HTN, Hyperlipidemia, GERD
  • Social: Denies tobacco use; occasional ETOH married, 3 children (1 girl, 2 boys)

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

Objective:

  • VS: Temp 99.8; BP 160/86; RR 16; P 92; HT 5’10”; WT 248lbs
  • Heart: RRR, no murmurs
  • Lungs: CTA, chest wall symmetrical
  • Skin: Intact without lesions, no urticaria
  • Abd: soft, hyperactive bowel sounds, pos pain in the LLQ
  • Diagnostics: None

Assessment:

  • Left lower quadrant pain
  • Gastroenteritis

 

Additional Information that Should Be Included in the Documentation of Subjective Data

According to Ball et al. (2015), it is critical to obtain a detailed abstract history of the torment when treating a patient with generalized stomach or abdominal pain in order to narrow the range of possible differential diagnoses. The main complaint should be “stomach or abdominal pain.”More information about the patient’s historical background regarding the current condition (HPI) and overall wellbeing from a previous time is required in the subjection section of the SOAP note in this case, which could be accomplished by asking more engaged or focused questions. More information about the patient’s overall health, eating habits and history prior to this condition is required, which could be obtained by asking more engaged or focus questions. It is also necessary to provide additional information about any changes in appetite and defecation or bowel movement. The historical context of the current illness should include information such as the beginning or onset, duration, qualities or characteristics, intensifying or exacerbating, and mitigating or alleviating symptoms in the case of the abdominal pain. It is critical to retain information on the nature of the pain, such as whether it is transitory or confined, whether the severity is increasing or decreasing, and where it originates and ends. One of the most basic questions to ask before beginning the test is about the location of the pain (Ball,2015).The patient should also be asked what he was doing before the pain started. Identifying which parts of the abdomen that the pain is felt most as well as responding to questions posed during the ROS is missing. This information is critical in narrowing down to the absolute most likely diagnose. Case Study SOAP Note

Despite the patient’s mention of diarrhea, mote information about bowel and urinary habits should be included. This includes the length and frequency of diarrhea episodes in a day, relieving and aggravating factors, and other diarrhea related symptoms. Incontinence, hesitancy, dysuria, urgency, and increased frequency of urination should all be documented. Still on the subject of urinary habits, details about the odor, color, and discomfort felt after or during a bowel movement should be provided. It is critical to rule out any potential abdominal pain side effects such as nausea and vomiting. Clearly, the patient had a 4year history of GI bleeding. As a result, details such as the absence or presence of blood in the vomitus or stool, as well as color and smell should be included.

Patient reports of missing to take medications would be filed under meds the last time he took them, necessitating a distinction between the justification for each medicine and why it should be discontinued.Also, a differential conclusion thought to be a negative finding for colon malignant growth or cancer should be recorded in the Assessment section. Finally, the family history must return to three generations, of which two out of three is documented. This healthcare provider ROS appears to have been derailed, and he failed to take note of or complete the remainder of the PMHx.Inquiries about lifestyle and exercise for diabetes and hypertension are acceptable practice and require legitimate clinical documentation (Ball, Dains, Flynn, Solomon, and Stewart, 2019). CAGE testing can assist you in avoiding alcohol addiction. What exactly is meant by “intermittent or occasional” drinking? How many, how frequently, and what are the ramifications? Case Study SOAP Note

 

 

 

Additional Information that Should Be Included in the Documentation of Objective Data

In the objective a section of the SOAP note, the documentation actually requires more data on the patient’s outward appearance. This includes how quickly the patient responds to questions, whether all inquiries are addressed appropriately, whether the patient’s cleanliness or physical appearance is acceptable, and the patient’s disposition and stance.Despite the fact that an auscultation was performed, which revealed hyperactivity and pain in one lower quadrant on one foot, the outcome of the midsection inspection and percussion of the abdomen was not disclosed.The actual assessment is incorrect. To coordinate with head-to-toe evaluation or assessment, frameworks or systems are consistently documented in a specific request. This section is devoid of any sort of overall evaluation. Only certain discoveries and relevant negative discoveries are required for the objectivedata or section of the SOAP note. when using HEENT, the body systems are listed in a particular order, HEENT before Neck, Neck before chest etc. The SOAP for the contextual investigation would be VS General, Skin, Chest, Abdomen, and Genitourinary (Ball et al., 2019). These areas contain all of the organs that could be causing stomach pain. In two of the positive stomach or abdominal pain, this provider is expected to use palpation and a stethoscope. Negative results for palpation and auscultation must be documented for the remainder of the assessment.Finally, if JR has a history of GI drain, where are his CBC, skin pallor, and capillaryrefill data? Where are JR’s blood glucose and CMP levels if he is a diabetic with the runs? Since the patient is on hypertension and diabetes medication, it is necessary to include data for blood sugar level. What is the LLQ palpation discoveries’ persona? Either there will be a mass or there will not be a mass or rebound tenderness. Is it sharp or dull as it travels? The following Lab test are needed; CBC, CMP, HbA1C, Abdominal x-ray, Stool guaiac, and stool WBC. Given his high risk of colon cancer and history of GI bleed, a referral for EGD/colonoscopy is a good option (Sullivan, 2019).

 

Is the Assessment Supported by the Subjected or Objective Information

The assessment is partially supported and partially not supported by subjective and objective data. For example, the patient’s abdominal grumbling, which includes stomach pain, loose bowels, and sickness, supports the diagnosis of gastroenteritis.According to Martin, gastroenteritis symptoms include stomach pain, watery loose stools, fever, sickness, squeezing, and migraine or headache (2016). Despite the fact that the patient-specific information supported the gastroenteritis diagnosis, the objectivepart of the SOAP note is not taken into account in the assessment.The patient complained generalized pain, which differed significantly from the pain noted in the Objective data in the left lower quadrant (LLQ). However, the pain in the left lower quadrant may be an alluded or referred pain that needs to be investigated further because real illnesses can be concealed by GI side effects. Case Study SOAP Note

 

 

Diagnostic Tests

The most appropriate characteristic tests that would be used to determine or come up with a diagnose of the patient current presentation are a total blood count (CBC) and a liver function test (LFTs). Completing a tumor markers test is also important. A CBC would show a normochromic pallor, as well as sickliness or anemia and thrombocytosis, all of which are signs of pancreatic disease.Increased levels of bilirubin, basic phosphatase, serum amylase, and lipase on the LFTs indicate obstructive jaundice (Fazzalari et al., 2019). The sugar or carbohydrateantigen 19-9, which would be raised to levels of 100U/ml due to pancreatic malignant development from the common level of 33-37U/ML iscurrently the most incredible tumor marker test(Fazzalari et al., 2019).In this case, it is strongly advised to use Computed Tomography scan (CT scan) rather than Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). A stomach CT scan can show the entire pelvis and mid-region. The presence of lower-thickness wounds on CT will aid in the confirmation of pancreatic malignant damage or growth.Examining the skin, stomach, or abdomen now revealed no obvious disclosures, such as the rigid concept of rigidity to propose a mass. Furthermore, there is no clinical, social, or familial history of pancreatitis or pancreatic malignancy.Regardless, the patient had abdominal and stomach pain, looseness of the bowels, and it was later revealed that, patient could eat despite some irrelevant squeamishness. Furthermore, due to the patient’s gastroenteritis condition, the pain was limited to the lower quadrant of the abdomen.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accept or reject soap

I will refuse to accept the review due to the goal details of left lower quadrant torture. In the majority of cases, the abstract information points to gastroenteritis; the patient has a low mesh fever, loose bowels, sickness and heaving, and stomach pain. Three conditions that could be considered a differential finding for this patient are as follows:

 

Irritable bowel syndrome

When food is unable to pass through the large or small digestive tracts, this occurs. According to the Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research, symptoms of intestinal obstruction include stomach pains, cramps, heaving, clogging, and sickness (2015).

 

A gallstone is a type of gallstone.

Strong materials that structure the gallbladder in such a way that it becomes clogged are referred to as this. WebMD lists some of the symptoms as queasiness, retching, acid reflux, and stomach pain (2017).

 

The bacteria H. Pylori causes stomach ulcers.

This is a stomach disease caused by microbes. Symptoms include stomach pain, regurgitation, loss of appetite, bulging, and sickness, according to Colledge and Cafasso (2015).

 

Diverticulitis is a digestive disease.

The most well-known cause of left lower quadrant torment is diverticula aggravation, which is caused by a tear, contamination, or growth of the diverticula, which are small pockets caused by a shortcoming of the colon. Left lower midsection pain, fever, sickness, regurgitation, and stomach discomfort are among the symptoms.

 

 

 

 

Irritable bowel syndrome (UCS) is a form of colitis

This is a differential conclusion due to the patient’s history of GI drain. The signs and symptoms include loose bowels, stomach pain, weakness, fever, and the need to poop. The color of the stool isn’t recorded in the abstract information, so there may be a hint of blood, stomach torment, weakness, fever, and the need to poop.A positive feces white platelet test would rule out ulcerative colitis and alert us to any other problems. Case Study SOAP Note

Reflection on Learning

Reflection on Learning

Week 7: Assignment: Reflection on Learning

Start Assignment

  • Due Apr 12 by 11:59pm

 

  • Points 100

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

  • Submitting a file upload

Purpose

The purpose of this activity is to deepen learning through reflective inquiry. It will allow for expansion in self-awareness, identification of knowledge gaps, and assessment of learning goals. Reflection on Learning

Course Outcomes

This assessment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

  • CO 1: Examine the role of the DNP-prepared nurse in leading financial planning and management across healthcare settings. (PO 2, 4, 9)
  • CO 2: Formulate a needs-based organizational assessment to inform strategic leadership decision-making (POs 3, 5, 7)
  • CO 3: Develop strategies to lead project planning, implementation, management, and evaluation to promote high value healthcare. (PO 3, 5, 7)

Due Date(s)

Submit your assignment by 11:59 p.m. MT Sunday at the end of Week 7. The late assignment policy applies to this assignment.

Total points possible: 100 points

Instructions

Follow these guidelines when completing this assignment. Contact your course faculty if you have questions.

Write a brief 1-2 paragraph weekly reflection addressing the questions posed in the Reflect section of each weekly module. Edit your Reflection to include each weekly reflection.

Include the following sections in your Reflection:

  • Week 1: Reflect upon your Week 1 learning journey in NR711 and address the following in 1-2 paragraphs:
    • As you assess your learning, provide one specific example of how you achieved one of the weekly objectives.
    • How will you promote collaborative, inter-professional relationships in a rapidly transforming healthcare environment?
    • What do you value the most about your learning this week? Reflection on Learning

 

  • Week 2: Reflect upon your Week 2 learning journey in NR711 and address the following in 1-2 paragraphs:
    • As you assess your learning, provide one specific example of how you achieved one of the weekly objectives.
    • How might you use this week’s information to benefit your organization in the future as a DNP-prepared nurse?
    • What do you value most about your learning this week?

 

 

  • Week 3: Reflect upon your Week 3 learning journey in NR711 and address the following in 1-2 paragraphs:
    • As you assess your learning, provide one specific example of how you achieved one of the weekly objective
    • How might you use the learning this week with your own DNP Project planning?
    • What do you value most about your learning this week?
  • Week 4: As you reflect upon your Week 4 learning journey in NR711 and address the following in 1-2 paragraphs:
    • As you assess your learning, provide one specific example of how you achieved one of the weekly objectives.
    • How might you improve on your communication skills to be more effective as a project manager?
    • What do you value most about your learning this week?
  • Week 5: Reflect upon your Week 5 learning journey in NR711 and address the following in one or two paragraphs:
    • As you assess your learning, provide one specific example of how you achieved one of the weekly objectives.
    • How might the outcomes of your project influence nursing practice and/or patient care, and/or your organization?
    • What do you value most about your learning this week?
  • Week 6: Reflect upon your Week 6 learning journey in NR711 and address the following in one or two paragraphs:
    • As you assess your learning, provide one specific example of how you achieved one of the weekly objectives.
    • How might your knowledge about budgets and financial analysis contribute to providing cost-saving solutions to patient care while improving outcomes? Reflection on Learning
    • What do you value most about your learning this week?

 

  • Week 7: Reflect upon your Week7 learning journey in NR711 and address the following in one or two paragraphs:
    • As you assess your learning, provide one specific example of how you achieved one of the weekly objectives.
    • How might your knowledge about current reimbursement trends be useful for you as a DNP-prepared nurse?
    • What do you value most about your learning this week?