Your office has received a series of claim denials from one particular insurance carrier and you do not agree with the decision.  You should consider appealing the denial. Go back and review the patient’s insurance card and verification form  for coverage information. The explanation of benefits (EOB) letter from the health plan is the key to payment or denial status. If the coverage language supports payment, write an appeal letter describing the disorder and its medical nature, and reference the coverage policy paragraph that shows how your treatment fits coverage criteria.  You may have to investigate coverage on the insurance website.

Write a 750-1000 word analysis of “Case Study: Fetal Abnormality.” Be sure to address the following questions:

1. Which theory or theories are being used by Jessica, Marco, Maria, and Dr. Wilson to determine the moral status of the fetus? Explain.
2. How does the theory determine or influence each of their recommendation for action?
3. What theory do you agree with? How would that theory determine or influence the recommendation for action?

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

RUBRIC:

Determination of Moral Status

Theory/Theories are identified that determine the moral status of the fetus for all of the people listed in the case study, including a detailed explanation.

Recommendation for Action

Recommendation for action is present, with detailed explanation that shows a deep understanding of the subject.

Personal Response to Case Study

Personal response to case study includes if you agree or disagree and a detailed explanation that shows a deep understanding of the subject including how the theory determines or influences the recommendation for action.

Thesis Development and Purpose

Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

Argument Logic and Construction

Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

All format elements are correct

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

1. Is this essentially saying that genetics matter more than experience, or that family communication or shared experience is not one of its defining features?

2. Do you believe that a person should stay in a family with and violent parent? Or can the bonds of blood and genetics be broken if a parent mistreats other family members?

You will find a job announcement of interest to you and write a letter of application to the job as ARNP ( nurse practitioner) Be sure to address the qualifications and job requirements that the employer is seeking in your letter. Market yourself to the employer by highlighting your experiences that will make you a good candidate for this job.

This is a Quantitative Research assignment. Please use the following article to prepare this assignment.

Record: 1

Title:Adoption of Evidence-Based Fall Prevention Practices in Primary Care for Older Adults with a History of FallsAuthors:Phelan, Elizabeth A.
Aerts, Sally
Dowler, David
Eckstrom, Elizabeth
Casey, Colleen M.Source:Frontiers in Public Health. Sept 8, 2016Publisher Information:Frontiers Research FoundationPublication Year:2016Subject Terms:Primary health care — Research
Evidence-based medicine
Medical research
Medicine, ExperimentalDescription:Author(s): Elizabeth A. Phelan, Sally Aerts, David Dowler, Elizabeth Eckstrom, Colleen M. Casey A multifactorial approach to assess and manage modifiable risk factors is recommended for older adults with a […]Document Type:Author abstract
ReportLanguage:EnglishISSN:2296-2565DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2016.00190Rights:Copyright 2016 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
COPYRIGHT 2016 Frontiers Research FoundationAccession Number:edsgcl.462848439 Persistent link to this record (Permalink):http://prx-usa.lirn.net/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsgao&AN=edsgcl.462848439&site=eds-live Cut and Paste:<a href=”http://prx-usa.lirn.net/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsgao&AN=edsgcl.462848439&site=eds-live”>Adoption of Evidence-Based Fall Prevention Practices in Primary Care for Older Adults with a History of Falls</a> Database:Academic OneFile

Purpose

The purpose of assignment is to provide experience and feedback with critical appraisal of a quantitative research study. This assignment is intended to allow you to show evidence of achievement of:

CLO 1: Evaluate existing scientific evidence to be used in decision making related to practice, leadership, or education. (ILO and PLO 3, ILO and PLO 7).

TASK

Use the provided template to critically appraise a quantitative study. Apply the grading rubrics to make sure that your submission is up to par with the requirements. Additionally, refer to the all unit resources (e.g., readings, recordings, announcements, etc.) to facilitate your process. Please make sure that you are choosing a quantitative study for your appraisal in a timely manner. Therefore, it is suggested to reach out one of our consultants from the USA library.

Requirements

This assignment is due at the end of week 7 at 11 p.m. A template is provided which describes the expectations for each section. In addition to submitting this template, also MUST submit a PDF of the study that you chose to appraise. If you do not submit the PDF of the study, your assignment is incomplete and a late penalty will apply. The study that you choose should be a study that you will be using for your synthesis project. It must be a quantitative research study (not a systematic review or a qualitative study) or you will receive a 0 for this assignment. No rewrites or resubmissions will be allowed. Graduate level writing is expected. First person is expected because this is your appraisal of the study. The following rubric will be used to score this assignment.

Quantitative Research Critical Appraisal (Template)

Attached Files:

•  Unit 5 Critical Appraisal of Quantitative Research Assignment Description and Rubric.docx (30.29 KB)
•  5 Quantitative Research Critical Appraisal Template.doc (51.5 KB)