PMHNP PRAC 6645 Clinical Skills Self-Assessment Form

PMHNP PRAC 6645 Clinical Skills Self-Assessment Form

PMHNP PRAC 6645 Clinical Skills 

Self-Assessment Form

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

Desired Clinical Skills for Students to Achieve Confident (Can complete independently) Mostly confident (Can complete with supervision) Beginning (Have performed with supervision or need supervision to feel confident) New (Have never performed or does not apply)
Comprehensive psychiatric evaluation skills in: 
Recognizing clinical signs and symptoms of psychiatric illness across the lifespan PMHNP PRAC 6645 Clinical Skills Self-Assessment Form   X    
Differentiating between pathophysiological and psychopathological conditions   X    
Performing and interpreting a comprehensive and/or interval history and physical examination (including laboratory and diagnostic studies)   X    
Performing and interpreting a mental status examination     X  
Performing and interpreting a psychosocial assessment and family psychiatric history     X  
Performing and interpreting a functional assessment (activities of daily living, occupational, social, leisure, educational).   X    
Diagnostic reasoning skill in:
Developing and prioritizing a differential diagnoses list   X    
Formulating diagnoses according to DSM 5 based on assessment data   X    
Differentiating between normal/abnormal age-related physiological and psychological symptoms/changes   X    
Pharmacotherapeutic skills in:
Selecting appropriate evidence based clinical practice guidelines for medication plan (e.g., risk/benefit, patient preference, developmental considerations, financial, the process of informed consent, symptom management)     X  
Evaluating patient response and modify plan as necessary     X  
Documenting (e.g., adverse reaction, the patient response, changes to the plan of care)   X    
Psychotherapeutic Treatment Planning:
Recognizes concepts of therapeutic modalities across the lifespan     X  
Selecting appropriate evidence based clinical practice guidelines for psychotherapeutic plan (e.g., risk/benefit, patient preference, developmental considerations, financial, the process of informed consent, symptom management, modality appropriate for situation)     X  
Applies age appropriate psychotherapeutic counseling techniques with individuals, families, and/or groups     X  
Develop an age appropriate individualized plan of care     X  
Provide psychoeducation to individuals, family, and/or groups     X  
Promote health and disease prevention techniques   X    
Self-Assessment skills:
Develop SMART goals for practicum experiences   X    
Evaluating outcomes of practicum goals and modify plan as necessary   X    
Documenting and reflecting on learning experiences   X    
Professional skills:
Maintains professional boundaries and therapeutic relationship with clients and staff X      
Collaborate with multi-disciplinary teams to improve clinical practice in mental health settings X      
Identifies ethical and legal dilemmas with possible resolutions   X    
Demonstrates non-judgmental practice approach and empathy X      
Practices within scope of practice X      
Selecting and implementing appropriate screening instrument(s), interpreting results, and making recommendations and referrals:
Demonstrates selecting the correct screening instrument appropriate for the clinical situation   X    
Implements the screening instrument efficiently and effectively with the clients   X    
Interprets results for screening instruments accurately   X    
Develops an appropriate plan of care based upon screening instruments response     X  
Identifies the need to refer to another specialty provider when applicable   X    
Accurately documents recommendations for psychiatric consultations when applicable   X    

 

Summary of strengths:

My foremost strength is professionalism. I definitely fathom my responsibility and I recognize how to uphold limitations with patients and colleagues. In my daily life I make it a practice not to judgment regardless of their situation. It is not hard to apply this habit in my professional practice.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Opportunities for growth:

My greatest opportunity for progress this quarter will be working with groups and families. This will be a new area in this semester. It will be remarkable how to traverse group and family dynamics while commerce with specific traits and interests.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Now, write three to four (3–4) possible goals and objectives for this practicum experience. Ensure that they follow the SMART Strategy, as described in the Learning Resources.

1.       Goal: I want to perform mental status exams on at various patients by the end of this practicum rotation.

a.       Objective: Comprehensive psychiatric evaluation skill

b.      Objective: Diagnostic Reasoning Skills

c.       Objective: Professional Skills

 

2.       Goal: I want to correctly identify clinical signs and symptoms to the corresponding mental illness for each patient that I see this quarter, as evidenced by acknowledging of practicum instructor.

a.       Objective: Comprehensive psychiatric evaluation

b.      Objective: Diagnostic Reasoning

c.       Objective: Shadow and participate in patient care

 

3.       Goal: Will complete 160 hours of clinical hours for this course as required.

a.       Objective: Arrive at the clinical site on time and well prepared.

b.      Objective: Enter patient information on Meditrek.

c.       Objective: Complete time log and patient information on a timely manner during practicum experience.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Signature:

Date: 3/1/22

Course/Section: NURS 6645 PRAC

Nursing homework help

Nursing homework help

There are several professional nursing journals that I can choose to publish my EBP project. I must choose a journal or magazine that is ready by many people. One of them is Nursing Research and Practice Journal. This is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies in all areas of nursing. I this this is the best way to disseminate my findings because the journal is open access and publishes only original research and peer reviewed articles. This will enable me to reach a wide audience. Nursing homework help

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

I think I should present my EBP project virtually in a conference called 4th International Conference on Nursing science & healthcare to be held on June 10th & 11th, 2022 at Manila, Philippines. This conference will be virtual like last years’ considering the global pandemic and travel restrictions (International Nursing Science and Healthcare Conference 2022 | Nursing Conferences – ICNSH, n.d.). I may opt for this conference because it will create connections between presentations and audience, while facilitating the free exchange of scientific information among attendees. United Scientific Group organizes the conference and it brings together different health care professionals including Scientists, Doctors, Professors, Nursing Lecturers, Nurses, Pharmaceutical Industries, Healthcare Industries, Directors of Association and Societies. I chose the conference because it provides a global platform for networking and exchanging the latest innovations and healthcare. It will provide me with a great opportunity to disseminate my EBP project findings (International Nursing Science and Healthcare Conference 2022 | Nursing Conferences – ICNSH, n.d.).

Interview and Interdisciplinary Issue Identification

Interview and Interdisciplinary Issue Identification

Assessment 2 Instructions: Interview and Interdisciplinary Issue Identification

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

  • PRINT
  • For this assessment, you will create a 2-4 page report on an interview you have conducted with a health care professional. You will identify an issue from the interview that could be improved with an interdisciplinary approach, and review best practices and evidence to address the issue.

    ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

As a baccalaureate-prepared nurse, your participation and leadership in interdisciplinary teams will be vital to the health outcomes for your patients and organization. One way to approach designing an improvement project is to use the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle. The Institute for Healthcare Improvement describes it thus:

The Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle is shorthand for testing a change in the real work setting—by planning it, trying it, observing the results, and acting on what is learned. This is the scientific method adapted for action-oriented learning…Essentially, the PDSA cycle helps you test out change ideas on a smaller scale before evaluating the results and making adjustments before potentially launching into a somewhat larger scale project (n.d.).

You might also recognize that the PDSA cycle resembles the nursing process. The benefit of gaining experience with this model of project design is that it provides nurses with an opportunity to ideate and lead improvements. For this assessment, you will not be implementing all of the PDSA cycle. Instead, you are being asked to interview a health care professional of your choice to determine what kind of interdisciplinary problem he or she is experiencing or has experienced in the workplace. This interview, in Assessment 2, will inform the research that you will conduct to propose a plan for interdisciplinary collaboration in Assessment 3.

It would be an excellent choice to complete the PDSA Cycle activity prior to developing the report. The activity consists of four questions that create the opportunity to check your understanding of best practices related to each stage of the PDSA cycle. The information gained from completing this formative will promote your success with the Interview and Interdisciplinary Issue Identification report. This will take just a few minutes of your time and is not graded.

Reference

Institute for Healthcare Improvement. (n.d.). How to improve. http://www.ihi.org/resources/Pages/HowtoImprove/default.aspx

Demonstration of Proficiency

  • Competency 2: Explain how interdisciplinary collaboration can be used to achieve desired patient and systems outcomes.
    • Summarize an interview focused on past or current issues at a health care organization.
    • Describe collaboration approaches from the literature that could be relevant in establishing or improving an interdisciplinary team to address an organizational issue.
  • Competency 3: Describe ways to incorporate evidence-based practice within an interdisciplinary team.
    • Identify an issue from an interview for which an evidence-based interdisciplinary approach would be appropriate.
  • Competency 4: Explain how change management theories and leadership strategies can enable interdisciplinary teams to achieve specific organizational goals.
    • Describe change theories and a leadership strategy that could help develop an interdisciplinary solution to an organizational issue.
  • Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based communication strategies to impact patient, interdisciplinary team, and systems outcomes.
    • Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.
    • Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.

Professional Context

This assessment will introduce the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) Model to create change in an organization. By interviewing a colleague of your choice, you will begin gathering information about an interprofessional collaboration problem that your colleague is experiencing or has experienced. You will identify a change theory and leadership strategies to help solve this problem.

Scenario

This assessment is the first of three related assessments in which you will gather interview information (Assessment 2); design a proposal for interdisciplinary problem-solving, (Assessment 3); and report on how an interdisciplinary improvement plan could be implemented in a place of practice (Assessment 4). At the end of the course, your interviewee will have a proposal plan based on the PDSA cycle that he or she could present to stakeholders to address an interdisciplinary problem in the workplace.

For this assessment, you will need to interview a health care professional such as a fellow learner, nursing colleague, administrator, business partner, or another appropriate person who could provide you with sufficient information regarding an organizational problem that he or she is experiencing or has experienced, or an area where they are seeking improvements. Consult the Interview Guide [DOCX] for an outline of how to prepare and the types of information you will need to complete this project successfully.

Remember: this is just the first in a series of three assessments.

Instructions

For this assessment, you will report on the information that you collected in your interview, analyzing the interview data and identifying a past or current issue that would benefit from an interdisciplinary approach. This could be an issue that has not been addressed by an interdisciplinary approach or one that could benefit from improvements related to the interdisciplinary approach currently being used. You will discuss the interview strategy that you used to collect information. Your interview strategy should be supported by citations from the literature. Additionally, you will start laying the foundation for your Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal (Assessment 3) by researching potential change theories, leadership strategies, and collaboration approaches that could be relevant to issue you have identified. Please be certain to review the scoring guide to confirm specific required elements of this assessment. Note that there are differences between basic, proficient and distinguished scores.

When submitting your plan, use the Interview and Issue Identification Template [DOCX], which will help you to stay organized and concise. As you complete the template, make sure you use APA format for in-text citations for the evidence and best practices that are informing your plan, as well as for the reference list at the end.

Additionally, be sure to address the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please study the scoring guide carefully so you understand what is needed for a distinguished score.

  • Summarize an interview focused on past or current issues at a health care organization.
  • Identify an issue from an interview for which an evidence-based interdisciplinary approach would be appropriate.
  • Describe potential change theories and leadership strategies that could inform an interdisciplinary solution to an organizational issue.
  • Describe collaboration approaches from the literature that could facilitate establishing or improving an interdisciplinary team to address an organizational issue.
  • Communicate with writing that is clear, logically organized, and professional, with correct grammar and spelling, and using current APA style.

Additional Requirements

  • Length of submission: Use the provided template. Most submissions will be 2 to 4 pages in length. Be sure to include a reference page at the end of the plan.
  • Number of references:Cite a minimum of 3 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your central ideas. Resources should be no more than 5 years old.
  • APA formatting:Make sure that in-text citations and reference list follow current APA style.

Portfolio Prompt: Remember to save the final assessment to your ePortfolio so that you may refer to it as you complete the final Capstone course.

  • SCORING GUIDE

Use the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated.

 

 

Interview and Interdisciplinary Issue Identification Scoring Guide

CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED
Summarize an interview focused on past or current issues at a health care organization. Does not summarize an interview focused on past or current issues at a health care organization. Discusses an interview, but the focus of the interview, the issues addressed, or the specifics of health care organizational context are unclear or missing. Summarizes an interview focused on past or current issues at a health care organization. Summarizes an interview focused on past or current issues at a health care organization. Notes strategies employed in the interview to ensure that sufficient information was gathered.
Identify an issue from an interview for which an evidence-based interdisciplinary approach would be appropriate. Does not identify an issue from an interview for which an evidence-based interdisciplinary approach would be appropriate. Identifies an issue with an unclear connection to the interview or for which an evidence-based interdisciplinary approach seems inappropriate. Identifies an issue from an interview for which an evidence-based interdisciplinary approach would be appropriate. Identifies an issue from an interview for which an evidence-based interdisciplinary approach would be appropriate, providing one or more specific reasons to justify this approach.
Describe potential change theories and leadership strategies that could help develop an interdisciplinary solution to an organizational issue. Does not describe potential change theories and leadership strategies that could help develop an interdisciplinary solution to an organizational issue. Identifies change theories and leadership strategies that are unclear, incomplete, or irrelevant to developing an interdisciplinary solution to an organizational issue. Describes potential change theories and leadership strategies that could help develop an interdisciplinary solution to an organizational issue. Describes potential change theories and leadership strategies that could help develop an interdisciplinary solution to an organizational issue. Notes which sources seem most credible or relevant to the specific organizational issue.
Describe collaborative approaches from the literature that could be relevant in establishing or improving an interdisciplinary team to address an organizational issue. Does not describe collaborative approaches from the literature that could be relevant in establishing or improving an interdisciplinary team to address an organizational issue. Identifies collaborative approaches from the literature but the relevance to establishing or improving an interdisciplinary team to address an organizational issue is unclear or insufficiently explained. Describes collaborative approaches from the literature that could be relevant in establishing or improving an interdisciplinary team to address an organizational issue. Describes collaborative approaches from the literature that could be relevant in establishing or improving an interdisciplinary team to address an organizational issue. Notes which sources seem most credible or relevant to the specific organizational issue.
Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling. Does not organize content for ideas. Lacks logical flow and smooth transitions. Organizes content with some logical flow and smooth transitions. Contains errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling. Organizes content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling. Organizes content with a clear purpose. Content flows logically with smooth transitions using coherent paragraphs, correct grammar/punctuation, word choice, and free of spelling errors.
Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format. Does not apply APA formatting to headings, in-text citations, and references. Does not use quotes or paraphrase correctly. Applies APA formatting to in-text citations, headings and references incorrectly and/or inconsistently, detracting noticeable from the content. Inconsistently uses headings, quotes and/or paraphrasing. Applies APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format. Exhibits strict and flawless adherence to APA formatting of headings, in-text citations, and references. Quotes and paraphrases correctly.

 

 

NSG 5000 Week 5 Assignment Two: Final Paper

NSG 5000 Week 5 Assignment Two: Final Paper

GCU NUR699 Full Course

GCU NUR699 Full Course

NUR699 Evidence Based Practice ProjectWeek 1 DiscussionDQ1 Explain the difference between research- and evidence-based practice projects. Provide an example of each one and the reason for the difference. Why should nurses be interested in learning about evidenced-bases practice? GCU NUR699 Full Course

DQ2 Discuss what strategies you could implement to create an evidence-based practice culture in your workplace. What steps can you take after leaving school to continue your evidence-based practice learning?

NUR699 Evidence Based Practice Project

Week 2 Discussion

DQ1 Review the “General Appraisal Overview for All Studies,” available in Appendix B in the textbook and the “PICOT: Components of an Answerable, Searchable Question” table, located in Chapter 2 of the textbook.

Formulate your PICOT question and post it to the main forum. Respond to at least two other statements, providing feedback. Review the statements to see if the clinical issue is clearly defined and that all aspects are identified. If one PICOT statement has at least two feedback posts, move to another statement.

You will be using the feedback to finalize your PICOT question in your Part B: Literature Analysis assignment in Topic 3.

DQ2 What is the difference between research studies and quality improvement studies? Explain which has the stronger level of evidence and why.

NUR699 Evidence Based Practice Project

Week 3 Discussion

DQ1 Discuss the importance of analyzing multiple studies when gathering literature for an evidence-based project proposal. Can a study with limitations still be useful to your project research?

DQ2 Explain what factors must be assessed when determining the credibility of quantitative studies. Which factor is t Read More 

he most important? Why? GCU NUR699 Full Course

ORDER   A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER   NOW

NUR699 Evidence Based Practice Project

Week 4 Discussion

DQ1 Consider a known or potential obstacle or barrier to your intervention implementation. Describe different strategies to deal with the management of any barriers, facilitators, and challenges.

DQ2 Evidence-based interventions often involved patient care. Explain why patient values and clinical judgment must be considered before applying evidence in clinical decision making for individual patients.

NUR699 Evidence Based Practice Project

Week 5 Discussion

DQ1 Why is it important to incorporate a theory or model related to change when implementing practice changes? Does the benefit of incorporating an EBP model outweigh the time and effort it took to include it? Discuss the model you have chosen and why you believe this is the most appropriate for your intervention.

DQ2 Discuss the importance of having a communication plan for your stakeholders. Would all stakeholders receive all communications? Why or why not?

NUR699 Evidence Based Practice Project

Week 6 Discussion

DQ1 When reviewing the literature and different types of evidence, there are often gaps in the findings. Are such gaps a help or a hindrance when wanting to create a change? Explain your thoughts.

DQ2 What is the difference between statistically significant evidence and clinically significant evidence? How would each of these findings be used to advance an evidenced-based project?

NUR699 Evidence Based Practice Project

Week 7 Discussion

DQ1 Research and EBP projects can be communicated (disseminated) in many ways. Discuss strategies to disseminate information to a staff-level nurse. What strategies would be best to disseminate information to advance practice nurses? How will you ensure that all appropriate audiences receive your information?

DQ2 Choose an industry-specific professional journal or conference and review their article/abstract submission guidelines. What components are highlighted in the guidelines, and why might these be important? What role does formatting play and why? Be sure to include the name of the journal or conference in your post.

NUR699 Evidence Based Practice Project

Week 8 Discussion

DQ1 Discuss ways to make evidence-based practice projects sustainable. Describe the plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation.

DQ2 There is power in having data to support change. The EBP process is one way of advancing improvements in health care. Identify three strategies that you will now incorporate into your practice based on this course. Explain your rationale. GCU NUR699 Full Course

NUR699 Evidence Based Practice Project

Week 1 Assignment

Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal – Part A: Problem Statement

The purpose of this assignment is to identify a problem, issue, or concern in the professional health care setting that is amenable to an evidence-based intervention. Write a 500-750 word paper on your proposed problem for your evidence-based practice project proposal. Complete the following:

Identify a problem, issue or concern in a professional health care setting that you would like to address for your evidence-based practice project. Research current literature for evidence-based solutions to ensure there is sufficient evidence to support your proposed topic. Note: As you research, you may find there is very little research to support your topic and you will need to choose a new topic. Remember, in order for this to be an evidence-based project proposal, you must have enough evidence to introduce this as a practice change. If you find that you do not have enough supporting evidence to change a practice, then further research would need to be conducted.

Once you have determined there is sufficient research for your chosen topic, develop an initial reference list of five sources to

G

demonstrate there is support for your evidence-based practice project. Follow the “Steps to an Efficient Search to Answer a Clinical Question” box in Chapter 3 of the textbook. Refer to the “Search Method Example” as the format in which to compile this data. The majority of references on your list should be research articles. However, national sources such as Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), Department of Health and Human Resources (HHS), or the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) and others may be used when you are gathering statistics to provide the rationale for the problem.

Provide a summary of the problem, include relevant background information, the current impact of the problem or issue in health care, and why it deserves attention. Provide rationale and support using professional literature sources. GCU NUR699 Full Course

Describe the practice setting where the identified issue or problem is occurring. Explain the current impact to the practice setting and the potential consequence if the problem or issue were to continue.

Identify the stakeholders who will be involved in this project. What organizations are concerned about, may benefit from, or are affected by this proposal? List the interested parties, patients, students, agencies, Joint Commission, etc.

State the purpose of the project and project objectives in specific, realistic, and measurable terms. The objectives should address what is to be gained. This will focus your PICOT statement as you develop and refine it over the next few weeks. Remember, measurements need to be taken before and after the evidence-based practice is introduced to identify the expected changes.

Summarize your proposed problem statement. A problem statement is a concise explanation of the problem or issue to be addressed and goals to be reached.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

NUR699 Evidence Based Practice Project

Week 2 Assignment

Literature Review Preparation

The purpose of this assignment is to gather research to support your evidence-based project proposal. The research must be sufficient, compelling, relevant, and from peer-reviewed professional journal articles. Complete the following:

Refer to your problem statement and proposed topic to search for evidence-based research that supports your proposed project.

Find a minimum of 12 peer-reviewed journal articles that support your proposed topic. The articles must have been published within the last 5 years. You may begin with the reference list you created in Topic 1.

Review the “Rapid Critical Appraisal Checklists,” located in Appendix B of the textbook and create a checklist or table to help evaluate the evidence and validity of each study. The specific checklist you choose will be determined by the type of evidence within the resource.GCU NUR699 Full Course

Once you have determined the validity and reliability of the article, use the “Literature Review: Table of Evidence” worksheet to document your articles. This table outlines the attributes of each study and documents the evidence that supports your proposed project. Using a summary table allows you to be more concise in your narrative description. Only research studies used to support your intervention are summarized in this table. You will refer to this table when you write your literature review, and as you develop your proposed solution in support of your intervention.

The “Rapid Critical Appraisal Checklists” and “Literature Review: Table of Evidence” submitted for this assignment are required as part of the appendices in the final paper.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

NUR699 Evidence Based Practice Project

Week 3 Assignment

Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal – Part B: Literature Analysis

The purpose of this assignment is to analyze the literature that was gathered and presented in the “Literature Review: Table of Evidence,” submitted in Topic 2. Based on your analysis, you will formally present your PICOT and research findings that demonstrate evidence-based support for your proposed project.

Write a 1,250-1,500 word paper that includes the following for each article:

Include a description of the search method used (e.g., databases, keywords, criteria for inclusion and exclusion, and number of studies that fit your criteria).

Summarize all of the research studies used as evidence. The essential components of each study need to be described so that readers can evaluate the scientific merit, including study strengths and limitations.

Incorporate a description of the validity and reliability of the research.

Include a concise summary describing how your project proposal is supported by the research.

Based on the analysis of the literature:

Finalize your PICOT statement using the “PICOT Question Template.” Include the “PICOT Question Template” in the appendix of your paper. The “PICOT Question Template” is required as part of the appendices in the final paper.

Present your finalized PICOT statement in the conclusion of your paper.

Upon receiving feedback from the instructor, refine “Part B: Literature Analysis” for your final submission. This will be a continuous process throughout the course for each section.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance. GCU NUR699 Full Course

 

NUR699 Evidence Based Practice Project

Week 4 Assignment

Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal – Part C: Proposed Intervention and Expected Outcomes

The purpose of this assignment is to outline the evidence-based intervention for your proposed project. In 500-750 words, address the following:

Proposed Intervention: Outline your proposed evidence-based intervention. Summarize why the intervention is appropriate and realistic for the practice setting you chose. Consider the setting, cost parameters, etc. If the intervention is unrealistic, you may need to revise your PICOT before moving forward.

Expected Outcomes: Explain the expected outcomes of the proposed project. How are the expected outcomes related to your project objectives? The outcomes should flow from the PICOT.

Method to Achieve Outcomes: Outline the steps that are needed to achieve the outcomes.

Potential Barriers, Assumptions, and Limitations: Describe specific barriers that may be encountered. Discuss assumptions or limitations which may need to be addressed.

Outcome Impact: Describe the impact the outcomes of the proposed intervention will have on one or all of the following indicators: quality care improvement, patient-centered quality care, efficiency of processes, environmental changes, and professional expertise.

Upon receiving feedback from the instructor, refine “Section C: Proposed Intervention and Expected Outcomes” for your final submission. This will be a continuous process throughout the course for each section.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

NUR699 Evidence Based Practice Project

Week 5 Assignment

Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal – Part D: Implementation Plan

The purpose of this assignment is to examine the elements associated with implementing an evidence-based intervention. In 1,000-1250 words, discuss the following aspects of implementation and explain how they apply to your proposed project.

Part A:

Apply an evidence-based practice (EBP) model or change model to your implementation plan.

Select a Model: Rogers’ diffusion of innovation theory is a particularly good theoretical framework to apply to EBP project. However, change models, such as Duck’s change curve model or the transtheoretical model of behavioral change, may also be used. Other conceptual models presented, such as a utilization model (Stetler’s model) and EBP models (the Iowa model and ARCC model) can also be used as a framework for applying your evidence-based intervention in clinical practice. GCU NUR699 Full Course

Application of Model: Apply one of the above-mentioned models, or another EBP model or change model, and carry your implementation through each of the stages, phases, or steps identified in the chosen model. An outline of the conceptual model is required as part of the appendices in the final paper.

Part B:

Describe the practice setting for the proposed project and discuss what approval is needed from the organization or department prior to implementing the intervention.

Describe the stakeholders who will be affected by the implementation. How will you communicate with them? Will they need special training for this intervention?

ORDER   A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER   NOW

Develop a timeline. Include the amount of time needed for the project to be completed. Discuss the different steps that will occur throughout the timeline. Make sure the timeline is general enough that it can be implemented at any date. For Topic 5, you will provide the timeline in narrative form. For your final paper, you will need to include a timeline graphic in the appendices.

Establish the financial feasibility of the implementation plan. To do this, address the costs for personnel, consumable supplies, equipment (if not provided by the institute), computer-related costs (librarian consultation, database access, etc.), resources, and other costs (travel, presentation development). Make sure to provide a brief rationale for each. Develop a budget plan. Although you will be submitting the budget plan in Topic 5 with the narrative, a budget plan graphic should be placed in the appendices for the final paper.

Upon receiving feedback from the instructor, refine “Part D: Implementation Plan” for your final submission. This will be a continuous process throughout the course for each section.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required t o submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance. GCU NUR699 Full Course

NUR699 Evidence Based Practice Project

Week 6 Assignment

Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal – Part E: Evaluation Plan

In 750-1,000 words, discuss an evaluation plan to measure the effectiveness of your evidence-based practice project. Provide the following criteria, making sure your evaluation plan is comprehensive and concise:

Propose evaluation methods to evaluate the implementation of your evidence-based intervention. Describe the methods selected and provide rationale and support for why the proposed methods are best for the collection of outcome data.

Describe how the proposed evaluation methods will measure whether the project objectives are achieved. Explain how the outcomes will be measured and evaluated based on the evidence. Address validity, reliability, and applicability.

Describe strategies to take if outcomes do not provide positive results.

Discuss implications for practice and future research.

Upon receiving feedback from the instructor, refine “Section E: Evaluation” for your final submission. This will be a continuous process throughout the course for each section.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the ?LopesWrite Technical Support articles? for assistance.

NUR699 Evidence Based Practice Project

Week 7 Assignment

Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Proposal: Final Paper

The purpose of the final paper is to communicate your evidence-based practice proposal for a problem, issue, or concern in the professional work setting. Incorporate sections A-E of your proposal into a 3,500-5,000 word paper detailing your evidence-based proposal project.

Refer to the “Evidence-Based Practice Proposal Final Paper Overview” for the required project outline and format. Ensure your final paper includes all necessary revisions to each section and incorporates instructor feedback accordingly.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

Benchmark Information

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:

MBA/MSN: Nursing Leadership in Health Care Systems

1.5 Communicate the utilization of evidence-based practice for the optimization of patient care outcomes.

NUR699 Evidence Based Practice Project

Week 8 Assignment

Evidence-Based Practice Proposal: Presentation of Proposed Project

Develop a PowerPoint presentation that covers all of the major areas of your Evidence-Based Practice Proposal. For the presentation of your PowerPoint, use Loom to create a 10-12 minute voice-over or a video. Refer to the study materials for additional guidance on recording your presentation with Loom. Include an additional slide for the Loom link at the beginning and an additional slide for References at the end. GCU NUR699 Full Course

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance. GCU NUR699 Full Course

NU-646: Week 14 Exam: Final Exam – Requires Respondus LockDown Browser + Webcam

NU-646: Week 14 Exam: Final Exam – Requires Respondus LockDown Browser + Webcam

Value: 100 points

Due: Day 7

Gradebook Category: Exams

This quiz is designed to check your understanding of a variety of key concepts in this course. While it does not address all key concepts, it will give you an opportunity to practice answering multiple-choice—style questions in preparation for the ANCC board exam after graduation.

ORDER   A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER   NOW

You will have 24 hours from the close of the exam to review the feedback and rationale for this exam. Access after this time will be a violation of the academic integrity policy – please see the Student Handbook or the Course Syllabus for further explanation of this policy. NU-646: Week 14 Exam: Final Exam – Requires Respondus LockDown Browser + Webcam

Innovative Informatics Tools And Applications To Clinical Practice

Innovative Informatics Tools And Applications To Clinical Practice

 

Week 10 Discussion: Weighing the Evidence

Need a response to this essay APA format 1.5 pages with 3 references

Week 10 Discussion:  Weighing the Evidence

Summary of Research Article Selected

The article by Ahmad & Grimes is a systematic review of the published research examining the effects of asthma self-education for school-age children on number of school days missed, emergency department visits, and hospital visits (2011).  The systematic review is at the pinnacle of the hierarchy of levels of evidence, giving the strongest evidence coming from careful synthesis of multiple studies (Polit & Beck, 2017).  The review contains a question that is clearly defined, uses a Health Promotion Model theoretical framework, well-defined inclusion criteria, and a wide sample size. Week 10 Discussion: Weighing the Evidence

Data and Results

                By analyzing the data and study design, the value and informativeness of this systemic review can be determined (Bernd, du Prel, & Blettner, 2009).  The systematic review included nine studies with one common purpose, which was to provide education to children with asthma in order to increase their knowledge of asthma and ultimately improve their self-care (Ahmad & Grimes, 2011).  The majority of the studies were randomized controlled experiments, with target populations ranging from 18 to over 900 children showing a strong sample size (Ahmad & Grimes, 2011).  The reviewed studies analyzed differences in the students’ preintervention and postintervention measurements, with the most common follow-up interval being 12 months (Ahmad & Grimes, 2011).  The researchers concluded that school-based asthma education programs substantially improve school attendance for students with asthma, but it is unclear whether these programs can decrease the frequency of emergency department visits and hospitalizations (Ahmad & Grimes, 2011).

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Weaknesses of Analysis and Alternate Interpretation of Data

The review states that the biggest weakness of the studies is that asthma severity was not accounted for, which dictates a child’s treatment course and frequency of attacks (Ahmad & Grimes, 2011).  This makes it difficult to compare a child who only occasionally needs a rescue inhaler with physical exertion to a child who takes several maintenance medications with a more frequent occurrence of attacks.  An alternate interpretation of the data could be that the asthma education provided is reduced emergency department visits, but perhaps the children were taken to their primary care provider or an urgent care, rather than the ED.  This would demonstrate a decrease in the number of ED visits recorded, while the children are still being seen for asthma in a different care setting.  Additional research into the frequency at which children take asthma medications and medication compliance could provide further insight into the impact asthma severity has on missed school days and ED visits. Week 10 Discussion: Weighing the Evidence

References

Ahmad, E. & Grimes, D.  (2011).  The effects of self-management education for school-age children on asthma morbidity:  A systematic review.  The Journal of the School Nursing, 27(4), 282-292. 

Bernd, R., du Prel, J.B., & Blettner, M.  (2009).  Study design in medical research:  Part 2 of a series on the evaluation of scientific publications.  Deutsches Aerzteblatt International, 106(11), 184-189.  Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2695375/pdf/Dtsch_Arztebl_Int-106-0184.pdf

Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2017). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice (10th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer.Week 10 Discussion: Weighing the Evidence