GCU NUR699 Full Course

GCU NUR699 Full Course

NUR699 Evidence Based Practice ProjectWeek 1 DiscussionDQ1 Explain the difference between research- and evidence-based practice projects. Provide an example of each one and the reason for the difference. Why should nurses be interested in learning about evidenced-bases practice? GCU NUR699 Full Course

DQ2 Discuss what strategies you could implement to create an evidence-based practice culture in your workplace. What steps can you take after leaving school to continue your evidence-based practice learning?

NUR699 Evidence Based Practice Project

Week 2 Discussion

DQ1 Review the “General Appraisal Overview for All Studies,” available in Appendix B in the textbook and the “PICOT: Components of an Answerable, Searchable Question” table, located in Chapter 2 of the textbook.

Formulate your PICOT question and post it to the main forum. Respond to at least two other statements, providing feedback. Review the statements to see if the clinical issue is clearly defined and that all aspects are identified. If one PICOT statement has at least two feedback posts, move to another statement.

You will be using the feedback to finalize your PICOT question in your Part B: Literature Analysis assignment in Topic 3.

DQ2 What is the difference between research studies and quality improvement studies? Explain which has the stronger level of evidence and why.

NUR699 Evidence Based Practice Project

Week 3 Discussion

DQ1 Discuss the importance of analyzing multiple studies when gathering literature for an evidence-based project proposal. Can a study with limitations still be useful to your project research?

DQ2 Explain what factors must be assessed when determining the credibility of quantitative studies. Which factor is t Read More 

he most important? Why? GCU NUR699 Full Course

ORDER   A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER   NOW

NUR699 Evidence Based Practice Project

Week 4 Discussion

DQ1 Consider a known or potential obstacle or barrier to your intervention implementation. Describe different strategies to deal with the management of any barriers, facilitators, and challenges.

DQ2 Evidence-based interventions often involved patient care. Explain why patient values and clinical judgment must be considered before applying evidence in clinical decision making for individual patients.

NUR699 Evidence Based Practice Project

Week 5 Discussion

DQ1 Why is it important to incorporate a theory or model related to change when implementing practice changes? Does the benefit of incorporating an EBP model outweigh the time and effort it took to include it? Discuss the model you have chosen and why you believe this is the most appropriate for your intervention.

DQ2 Discuss the importance of having a communication plan for your stakeholders. Would all stakeholders receive all communications? Why or why not?

NUR699 Evidence Based Practice Project

Week 6 Discussion

DQ1 When reviewing the literature and different types of evidence, there are often gaps in the findings. Are such gaps a help or a hindrance when wanting to create a change? Explain your thoughts.

DQ2 What is the difference between statistically significant evidence and clinically significant evidence? How would each of these findings be used to advance an evidenced-based project?

NUR699 Evidence Based Practice Project

Week 7 Discussion

DQ1 Research and EBP projects can be communicated (disseminated) in many ways. Discuss strategies to disseminate information to a staff-level nurse. What strategies would be best to disseminate information to advance practice nurses? How will you ensure that all appropriate audiences receive your information?

DQ2 Choose an industry-specific professional journal or conference and review their article/abstract submission guidelines. What components are highlighted in the guidelines, and why might these be important? What role does formatting play and why? Be sure to include the name of the journal or conference in your post.

NUR699 Evidence Based Practice Project

Week 8 Discussion

DQ1 Discuss ways to make evidence-based practice projects sustainable. Describe the plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation.

DQ2 There is power in having data to support change. The EBP process is one way of advancing improvements in health care. Identify three strategies that you will now incorporate into your practice based on this course. Explain your rationale. GCU NUR699 Full Course

NUR699 Evidence Based Practice Project

Week 1 Assignment

Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal – Part A: Problem Statement

The purpose of this assignment is to identify a problem, issue, or concern in the professional health care setting that is amenable to an evidence-based intervention. Write a 500-750 word paper on your proposed problem for your evidence-based practice project proposal. Complete the following:

Identify a problem, issue or concern in a professional health care setting that you would like to address for your evidence-based practice project. Research current literature for evidence-based solutions to ensure there is sufficient evidence to support your proposed topic. Note: As you research, you may find there is very little research to support your topic and you will need to choose a new topic. Remember, in order for this to be an evidence-based project proposal, you must have enough evidence to introduce this as a practice change. If you find that you do not have enough supporting evidence to change a practice, then further research would need to be conducted.

Once you have determined there is sufficient research for your chosen topic, develop an initial reference list of five sources to

G

demonstrate there is support for your evidence-based practice project. Follow the “Steps to an Efficient Search to Answer a Clinical Question” box in Chapter 3 of the textbook. Refer to the “Search Method Example” as the format in which to compile this data. The majority of references on your list should be research articles. However, national sources such as Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), Department of Health and Human Resources (HHS), or the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) and others may be used when you are gathering statistics to provide the rationale for the problem.

Provide a summary of the problem, include relevant background information, the current impact of the problem or issue in health care, and why it deserves attention. Provide rationale and support using professional literature sources. GCU NUR699 Full Course

Describe the practice setting where the identified issue or problem is occurring. Explain the current impact to the practice setting and the potential consequence if the problem or issue were to continue.

Identify the stakeholders who will be involved in this project. What organizations are concerned about, may benefit from, or are affected by this proposal? List the interested parties, patients, students, agencies, Joint Commission, etc.

State the purpose of the project and project objectives in specific, realistic, and measurable terms. The objectives should address what is to be gained. This will focus your PICOT statement as you develop and refine it over the next few weeks. Remember, measurements need to be taken before and after the evidence-based practice is introduced to identify the expected changes.

Summarize your proposed problem statement. A problem statement is a concise explanation of the problem or issue to be addressed and goals to be reached.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

NUR699 Evidence Based Practice Project

Week 2 Assignment

Literature Review Preparation

The purpose of this assignment is to gather research to support your evidence-based project proposal. The research must be sufficient, compelling, relevant, and from peer-reviewed professional journal articles. Complete the following:

Refer to your problem statement and proposed topic to search for evidence-based research that supports your proposed project.

Find a minimum of 12 peer-reviewed journal articles that support your proposed topic. The articles must have been published within the last 5 years. You may begin with the reference list you created in Topic 1.

Review the “Rapid Critical Appraisal Checklists,” located in Appendix B of the textbook and create a checklist or table to help evaluate the evidence and validity of each study. The specific checklist you choose will be determined by the type of evidence within the resource.GCU NUR699 Full Course

Once you have determined the validity and reliability of the article, use the “Literature Review: Table of Evidence” worksheet to document your articles. This table outlines the attributes of each study and documents the evidence that supports your proposed project. Using a summary table allows you to be more concise in your narrative description. Only research studies used to support your intervention are summarized in this table. You will refer to this table when you write your literature review, and as you develop your proposed solution in support of your intervention.

The “Rapid Critical Appraisal Checklists” and “Literature Review: Table of Evidence” submitted for this assignment are required as part of the appendices in the final paper.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

NUR699 Evidence Based Practice Project

Week 3 Assignment

Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal – Part B: Literature Analysis

The purpose of this assignment is to analyze the literature that was gathered and presented in the “Literature Review: Table of Evidence,” submitted in Topic 2. Based on your analysis, you will formally present your PICOT and research findings that demonstrate evidence-based support for your proposed project.

Write a 1,250-1,500 word paper that includes the following for each article:

Include a description of the search method used (e.g., databases, keywords, criteria for inclusion and exclusion, and number of studies that fit your criteria).

Summarize all of the research studies used as evidence. The essential components of each study need to be described so that readers can evaluate the scientific merit, including study strengths and limitations.

Incorporate a description of the validity and reliability of the research.

Include a concise summary describing how your project proposal is supported by the research.

Based on the analysis of the literature:

Finalize your PICOT statement using the “PICOT Question Template.” Include the “PICOT Question Template” in the appendix of your paper. The “PICOT Question Template” is required as part of the appendices in the final paper.

Present your finalized PICOT statement in the conclusion of your paper.

Upon receiving feedback from the instructor, refine “Part B: Literature Analysis” for your final submission. This will be a continuous process throughout the course for each section.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance. GCU NUR699 Full Course

 

NUR699 Evidence Based Practice Project

Week 4 Assignment

Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal – Part C: Proposed Intervention and Expected Outcomes

The purpose of this assignment is to outline the evidence-based intervention for your proposed project. In 500-750 words, address the following:

Proposed Intervention: Outline your proposed evidence-based intervention. Summarize why the intervention is appropriate and realistic for the practice setting you chose. Consider the setting, cost parameters, etc. If the intervention is unrealistic, you may need to revise your PICOT before moving forward.

Expected Outcomes: Explain the expected outcomes of the proposed project. How are the expected outcomes related to your project objectives? The outcomes should flow from the PICOT.

Method to Achieve Outcomes: Outline the steps that are needed to achieve the outcomes.

Potential Barriers, Assumptions, and Limitations: Describe specific barriers that may be encountered. Discuss assumptions or limitations which may need to be addressed.

Outcome Impact: Describe the impact the outcomes of the proposed intervention will have on one or all of the following indicators: quality care improvement, patient-centered quality care, efficiency of processes, environmental changes, and professional expertise.

Upon receiving feedback from the instructor, refine “Section C: Proposed Intervention and Expected Outcomes” for your final submission. This will be a continuous process throughout the course for each section.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

NUR699 Evidence Based Practice Project

Week 5 Assignment

Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal – Part D: Implementation Plan

The purpose of this assignment is to examine the elements associated with implementing an evidence-based intervention. In 1,000-1250 words, discuss the following aspects of implementation and explain how they apply to your proposed project.

Part A:

Apply an evidence-based practice (EBP) model or change model to your implementation plan.

Select a Model: Rogers’ diffusion of innovation theory is a particularly good theoretical framework to apply to EBP project. However, change models, such as Duck’s change curve model or the transtheoretical model of behavioral change, may also be used. Other conceptual models presented, such as a utilization model (Stetler’s model) and EBP models (the Iowa model and ARCC model) can also be used as a framework for applying your evidence-based intervention in clinical practice. GCU NUR699 Full Course

Application of Model: Apply one of the above-mentioned models, or another EBP model or change model, and carry your implementation through each of the stages, phases, or steps identified in the chosen model. An outline of the conceptual model is required as part of the appendices in the final paper.

Part B:

Describe the practice setting for the proposed project and discuss what approval is needed from the organization or department prior to implementing the intervention.

Describe the stakeholders who will be affected by the implementation. How will you communicate with them? Will they need special training for this intervention?

ORDER   A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER   NOW

Develop a timeline. Include the amount of time needed for the project to be completed. Discuss the different steps that will occur throughout the timeline. Make sure the timeline is general enough that it can be implemented at any date. For Topic 5, you will provide the timeline in narrative form. For your final paper, you will need to include a timeline graphic in the appendices.

Establish the financial feasibility of the implementation plan. To do this, address the costs for personnel, consumable supplies, equipment (if not provided by the institute), computer-related costs (librarian consultation, database access, etc.), resources, and other costs (travel, presentation development). Make sure to provide a brief rationale for each. Develop a budget plan. Although you will be submitting the budget plan in Topic 5 with the narrative, a budget plan graphic should be placed in the appendices for the final paper.

Upon receiving feedback from the instructor, refine “Part D: Implementation Plan” for your final submission. This will be a continuous process throughout the course for each section.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required t o submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance. GCU NUR699 Full Course

NUR699 Evidence Based Practice Project

Week 6 Assignment

Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal – Part E: Evaluation Plan

In 750-1,000 words, discuss an evaluation plan to measure the effectiveness of your evidence-based practice project. Provide the following criteria, making sure your evaluation plan is comprehensive and concise:

Propose evaluation methods to evaluate the implementation of your evidence-based intervention. Describe the methods selected and provide rationale and support for why the proposed methods are best for the collection of outcome data.

Describe how the proposed evaluation methods will measure whether the project objectives are achieved. Explain how the outcomes will be measured and evaluated based on the evidence. Address validity, reliability, and applicability.

Describe strategies to take if outcomes do not provide positive results.

Discuss implications for practice and future research.

Upon receiving feedback from the instructor, refine “Section E: Evaluation” for your final submission. This will be a continuous process throughout the course for each section.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the ?LopesWrite Technical Support articles? for assistance.

NUR699 Evidence Based Practice Project

Week 7 Assignment

Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Proposal: Final Paper

The purpose of the final paper is to communicate your evidence-based practice proposal for a problem, issue, or concern in the professional work setting. Incorporate sections A-E of your proposal into a 3,500-5,000 word paper detailing your evidence-based proposal project.

Refer to the “Evidence-Based Practice Proposal Final Paper Overview” for the required project outline and format. Ensure your final paper includes all necessary revisions to each section and incorporates instructor feedback accordingly.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

Benchmark Information

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:

MBA/MSN: Nursing Leadership in Health Care Systems

1.5 Communicate the utilization of evidence-based practice for the optimization of patient care outcomes.

NUR699 Evidence Based Practice Project

Week 8 Assignment

Evidence-Based Practice Proposal: Presentation of Proposed Project

Develop a PowerPoint presentation that covers all of the major areas of your Evidence-Based Practice Proposal. For the presentation of your PowerPoint, use Loom to create a 10-12 minute voice-over or a video. Refer to the study materials for additional guidance on recording your presentation with Loom. Include an additional slide for the Loom link at the beginning and an additional slide for References at the end. GCU NUR699 Full Course

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance. GCU NUR699 Full Course

NU-646: Week 14 Exam: Final Exam – Requires Respondus LockDown Browser + Webcam

NU-646: Week 14 Exam: Final Exam – Requires Respondus LockDown Browser + Webcam

Value: 100 points

Due: Day 7

Gradebook Category: Exams

This quiz is designed to check your understanding of a variety of key concepts in this course. While it does not address all key concepts, it will give you an opportunity to practice answering multiple-choice—style questions in preparation for the ANCC board exam after graduation.

ORDER   A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER   NOW

You will have 24 hours from the close of the exam to review the feedback and rationale for this exam. Access after this time will be a violation of the academic integrity policy – please see the Student Handbook or the Course Syllabus for further explanation of this policy. NU-646: Week 14 Exam: Final Exam – Requires Respondus LockDown Browser + Webcam

Innovative Informatics Tools And Applications To Clinical Practice

Innovative Informatics Tools And Applications To Clinical Practice

 

Week 10 Discussion: Weighing the Evidence

Need a response to this essay APA format 1.5 pages with 3 references

Week 10 Discussion:  Weighing the Evidence

Summary of Research Article Selected

The article by Ahmad & Grimes is a systematic review of the published research examining the effects of asthma self-education for school-age children on number of school days missed, emergency department visits, and hospital visits (2011).  The systematic review is at the pinnacle of the hierarchy of levels of evidence, giving the strongest evidence coming from careful synthesis of multiple studies (Polit & Beck, 2017).  The review contains a question that is clearly defined, uses a Health Promotion Model theoretical framework, well-defined inclusion criteria, and a wide sample size. Week 10 Discussion: Weighing the Evidence

Data and Results

                By analyzing the data and study design, the value and informativeness of this systemic review can be determined (Bernd, du Prel, & Blettner, 2009).  The systematic review included nine studies with one common purpose, which was to provide education to children with asthma in order to increase their knowledge of asthma and ultimately improve their self-care (Ahmad & Grimes, 2011).  The majority of the studies were randomized controlled experiments, with target populations ranging from 18 to over 900 children showing a strong sample size (Ahmad & Grimes, 2011).  The reviewed studies analyzed differences in the students’ preintervention and postintervention measurements, with the most common follow-up interval being 12 months (Ahmad & Grimes, 2011).  The researchers concluded that school-based asthma education programs substantially improve school attendance for students with asthma, but it is unclear whether these programs can decrease the frequency of emergency department visits and hospitalizations (Ahmad & Grimes, 2011).

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Weaknesses of Analysis and Alternate Interpretation of Data

The review states that the biggest weakness of the studies is that asthma severity was not accounted for, which dictates a child’s treatment course and frequency of attacks (Ahmad & Grimes, 2011).  This makes it difficult to compare a child who only occasionally needs a rescue inhaler with physical exertion to a child who takes several maintenance medications with a more frequent occurrence of attacks.  An alternate interpretation of the data could be that the asthma education provided is reduced emergency department visits, but perhaps the children were taken to their primary care provider or an urgent care, rather than the ED.  This would demonstrate a decrease in the number of ED visits recorded, while the children are still being seen for asthma in a different care setting.  Additional research into the frequency at which children take asthma medications and medication compliance could provide further insight into the impact asthma severity has on missed school days and ED visits. Week 10 Discussion: Weighing the Evidence

References

Ahmad, E. & Grimes, D.  (2011).  The effects of self-management education for school-age children on asthma morbidity:  A systematic review.  The Journal of the School Nursing, 27(4), 282-292. 

Bernd, R., du Prel, J.B., & Blettner, M.  (2009).  Study design in medical research:  Part 2 of a series on the evaluation of scientific publications.  Deutsches Aerzteblatt International, 106(11), 184-189.  Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2695375/pdf/Dtsch_Arztebl_Int-106-0184.pdf

Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2017). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice (10th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer.Week 10 Discussion: Weighing the Evidence

What is your primary nursing priority right now?

Pediatric Clinical Reasoning Case Study: Poison IngestionCreated by Kathleen Mixson, RN, MS, JDI. Data CollectionChief complaint/History of Present Illness: Brandy is a 22 month .old female presenti

Pediatric Clinical Reasoning Case Study: Poison IngestionCreated by Kathleen Mixson, RN, MS, JDI. Data CollectionChief complaint/History of Present Illness:   Brandy is a 22 month .old female presenting with ingestion at 10:30 pm yesterday of estimated 1/2 tsp of solder flux and immediately had vomiting of about 12 times, taken immediately to the emergency room.  No vomiting since around 3 am but continues to have gagging and retching.  No diarrhea. Has raspy voice, fussiness.   Had chemistries, LFTs, CBC, IV started in ER.   Acute ingestion of zinc chloride-containing solder flux (contains 30-36% zinc chloride), which is caustic to GI tract, skin, and eyes.  Also if significant systemic absorption occurs, systemic toxicity may include altered mental status, renal insufficiency.  Patient to be admitted for observation and monitoring for systemic effects.  If no respiratory distress or abnormal labs the plan is to discharge this afternoon.       What data is relevant  to this patient that must be recognized as clinically significant to the nurse? What is your primary nursing priority right now?

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Rationale:

Personal/Social History:  Mom and dad at bedside.  Lives with parents. English speaking

PMH:  Allergic rhinitis, night-time cough, thought to have seasonal allergies as a cause of chronic vomiting. Born at 36 weeks gestation, no complications, SVD. 

Current Medications: None

Patient Care Begins:Your Initial VS:T: 97.9º FP:  118R:  38BP:  100/76O2 sats:  98%  on 2L per NC Weight:  15,2 kgPain:  3/10 FLACC 

What VS data is relevant  to this patient that must be recognized as clinically significant to the nurse?

Rationale:  

Your Initial Nursing Assessment:GENERAL APPEARANCE: Fussy, irritable and requiring frequent comforting from parents.RESPIRATORY:  Breath sounds equal and with good aeration bilaterally.  No stridor or nasal flaring. Mom states continued raspy voice.CARDIAC: Heart rate regular-S1S2. Pulses palpable and equal bilaterally. Capillary refill less than 3 seconds.NEUROLOGIC:   Alert with normal muscle tone and movement of extremities.ABDOMEN/GI: Currently NPO.  Mouth and throat red and raw looking.  Abdomen soft, non-tender with active bowel sounds all four quads. GENITOURINARY: Voiding per diaper. EXTREMITIES/SKIN:  Skin is warm and dry-normal for color of skin. IV in place to right hand, infusing D5 ½NS  at 42 per hour.  Site without redness or edema.  Hands equal bilaterally.

What assessment data is relevant that must be recognized as clinically significant to the nurse?

Rationale:

II. Clinical Reasoning BeginsWhat is the most likely medical problem that your patient is presenting with?

What is the underlying cause /pathophysiology of this concern?

What is your primary nursing priority right now?

Case 2: Ankle Pain Assignment

Case 2: Ankle Pain Assignment

A 46-year-old female reports pain in both of her ankles, but she is more concerned about her right ankle. She was playing soccer over the weekend and heard a “pop.” She can bear weight, but it is uncomfortable. In determining the cause of the ankle pain, based on your knowledge of anatomy, what foot structures are likely involved? What other symptoms need to be explored? What are your differential diagnoses for ankle pain? What physical examination will you perform? What special maneuvers will you perform? Should you apply the Ottawa ankle rules to determine if you need additional testing? Case 2: Ankle Pain Assignment

NURS6512 Discussion- Week 8

 

Episodic/focus SOAP Note Template 

Case 1: Back Pain                                      

 

Patient Information

 

Initials: H.H                     Age: 42                  Gender: Male.     Race: Caucasian

 

SUBJECTIVE DATA:

 

Chief Complaint (CC): “Lower Back Pain”

 

History of Present Illness (HPI): Patient is a 42-year-old white male who developed lower back pain that has been bothering him for the past month. He states that the pain radiates to his left leg sometimes, and it increases with sitting for a long period of time but gets better when standing. Severity of pain is 7/10 on pain scale of 0/10.

 

Current Medications: OTC Ibuprofen 300mg 2 tablets every 6hours PRN for Lower back pain.

Amlodipine 10mg 1 tab PO daily for hypertension

 

Allergic/Immunologic: No known drug, food seasonal, latex/rubber allergies

Past Medical History (PMH): Lower Back Pain

Past Surgical History (PSH): None

Sexual/Reproductive History: Single with no kids.

Personal/Social History: Patient works at a storage company as an assistant manager. He enjoys hiking, surfing, and skiing. He reports drinking alcohol on rare occasions, denies illicit drug use and smoking tobacco. He reports a healthy lifestyle including lifting weights three times a week and eating a high protein and low carb diet. Case 2: Ankle Pain Assignment

Immunization History: Influenza 11/1/2020, Pneumovax 05/2020.   Tetanus-Unknown

Significant Family History:

Father: Father is 79 and still living. He has Hypertension, diabetes type 2, and asthma.

Paternal Grandmother: She had hypertension and died at the age of 85.

Paternal Grandfather: Died at the age of 80, had asthma.

Mother: His mother is still alive and has diabetes type 2.

Maternal Grandfather: Died at the age of 80, had type 2 diabetes.

Maternal Grandmother: Died at the age of 85, had a stroke.

Sister: Age 45, has type 2 diabetes.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW

Review of Systems:

General: The patient is alert and oriented to person, place, time and situation, appropriately dress according to the weather, good judgement, and a well-nourished Caucasian male. No distress noted but mild discomfort due to pain in his lower back radiating to his left leg. His emotional and behavioral needs are appropriate at the present time considering patient’s clinical condition. Denies current home stress and abuse. Case 2: Ankle Pain Assignment

HEENT:

  • Eyes: Patient denies itching eyes or discharges, uses glasses but does not use contact lens, and denies blurred vision.
  • Ears: He denies ringing in the ears, hearing loss, and discharged. He also denies surgery to the ears and any recent infections.
  • Nose: Denies epistaxis, discharges, congestion, and sneezing. Denies loss of smell.
  • Throat: Denies any sore throat, or infection. Denies difficulty swallowing.
  • Skin: Negative for skin lesion, mole eczema or rash and no skin changes.
  • Neck: No
  • Respiratory: Denies shortness of breath, or difficulty breathing, coughing, wheezing, and secondhand smoking.
  • Cardiovascular/Peripheral Vascular: Denies chest pain, heaviness, or heart palpitation, and edema to bilateral lower extremities.
  • Gastrointestinal: Denies any abdominal upset, nausea or vomiting, have regular bowel movements. Denies change in appetite, and recent weight loss.
  • Genitourinary: Denies difficulty voiding, changes in voiding pattern, and any penile discharge.
  • Musculoskeletal: Complaints of Lower back pain that radiates down to the left leg. Denies any joint stiffness or joint pain.
  • Psychiatric: H.H states that he is fine., denies any mental problems or issues, denies having depression, suicidal thoughts. He states that he loves his wife and family and can never commit suicide. Case 2: Ankle Pain Assignment
  • Neurological: denies light headedness, fainting, seizure, vision changes or weakness to any side of his body. Also denies changes in his thinking. Denies syncope, seizures, or tremors. States, pain and burning sensation in left buttocks down left leg past knee.
  • Hematologic: Denies any bleeding. Denies history of blood transfusions, clotting disorders, or easy bruising.
  • Endocrine: Denies cold or heat intolerance, excessive thirst, or urination, does not have any issues with thyroid. Denies unexplained weight gain or loss, skin dryness or cracking.

 

OBJECTIVE DATA:

Physical Exam:

Vital signs: B/P 148/88; P 75; R 18; T 98.0F orally; 02 SAT 97% on room air; Wt: 155lbs; Ht: 5’11”; BMI: 20.2     Pain 7/10 on a scale of 0-10 at rest.

 

General: Patient is a 42-year-old male who presents as a well-developed young adult at his age. He is alert, oriented, and cooperative. The patient walks with slight limp.

HEENT:

  • Head: Normocephalic head with normal distribution of hair. No facial tenderness to light sensation.
  • Eyes: Conjunctivas are pink with white sclera and without jaundice. PERLA, with pupils 3mm in size bilaterally. No exudates seen. Corneal light reflex intact. No nystagmus noted. Red reflex present. Optic disc creamy pink with sharp, well defined margins. Retina- pink without vascularization. Case 2: Ankle Pain Assignment
  • Ears: Auricles symmetrical bilaterally without pain or tenderness. Use of otoscope visualized external auditory canal, and middle ear showing mild redness and bulging, with serum fluid. Tympanic membranes are pearly grey with bony landmarks and light reflex visualized bilaterally. No drainage from ear, and no facial grimace noted upon examination. Patient is not pulling or tugging on ear or showing signs of distress.

 

  • Nose: Nasopharynx and pharynx without erythema, lesion, or exudates. Mucous membranes are moist.
  • Throat: Uvula midline, palate rises symmetrically. Oropharynx clear. No sore throat, with swallowing, or enlarge nodes, no redness. Tongue beefy and symmetrical without crusting. Upper, and lower teeth in good condition and intact.
  • Skin: Dry and warm to touch. Not pale, cyanosis or ashen. No tear and non-tainting.
  • Neck: Normal ROM, Supple with no JVD or bruits. JVD 6cm at 45-degree elevation. Thyroid moves freely with swallow test. No nodules or masses or lesions. No lymphadenopathy. Trachea midline. There is no adenopathy.
  • Chest/Lungs: Clear to auscultation bilaterally anteriorly and posteriorly with equal symmetry of chest rise and fall. Breathing appears non-labored. Respiratory excursion 4cm bilaterally. Appears quiet and at ease. No adventitious sounds. Tactile fremitus symmetrical. Resonance noted to percussion bilaterally. No wheezes, rhonchi or stridor. No complaint of SOB, no cough. No pain or tenderness noted over ribs or bony prominence. No pain noted when palpating breasts. No swollen axillary lymph nodes.
  • Heart/Peripheral Vascular: The heart rate is regular with a normal rhythm. PMI is heard at the fifth intercoastal space midclavicular line. S1, and S2 normal.  All peripheral pulses are strong and palpable 3+, Negative edema to all extremities. Capillary refill is less than/equal to 2seconds in all extremities and no cyanosis noted or clubbing on nails.
  • Abdomen: Soft and nondistended, bowel sound present and active in all four quadrants, no pain or rebound tenderness noted. Last bowel movement was this morning. The liver span percussed to 9cm. No hernias palpated. No hepatomegaly or splenomegaly noted. No renal artery bruits auscultated. Negative McBurney’s point. Case 2: Ankle Pain Assignment
  • Musculoskeletal: Spine is vertically aligned. Normal S- curvature. No nodules, masses, or tenderness with palpation. Low back pain radiating to left lower extremity. No evidence of trauma to affected area. Full ROM in all joints. BUE and BLE symmetrical. No pain or tenderness with palpation of joints. Extremities symmetrical without atrophy or hypertrophy. No pain or tenderness with passive ROM. Active and Passive ROM equal between contralateral joints. No crepitation’s or tenderness with movement noted. Case 2: Ankle Pain Assignment
  • Neurological: Patient is alert and oriented to place, person, time and situation, appropriate judgement. Speech is clear, no facial drooping, no vision changes, follows movement. Understand clear, complex, comprehensive without cues or repetition.
  • Genital/Rectal: Penis and testicles without lesions. No inguinal hernias are present. Rectal exam had intact tone. Firm, symmetric, nontender prostate without nodules.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW

Diagnostic Tests:

  • Walk across the room to examine abnormalities in gait (pattern of walking).
  • Hip flexion and knee hyperextension up to 30 degrees. Bend or flex part of the spine to assess spinal range of motion.
  • Complete Blood Count (CBC) may point to infections or inflammation.
  • Erythrocyte sedimentation rate
  • HLA-B27
  • Bone scans
  • X-ray of the lumbar spine
  • Computerized tomography (CT) cervical spine/lumbar with without contrast to detect abnormal tissue, and the state of the patient’s spine.
  • MRI of the lumbar spine to reveal the structure of soft tissues such as discs, spinal cord, and nerves.

 

ASSESSMENT:

 

Differential diagnoses:

Lumbar Disc Herniation (LDH): The intervertebral disc is made up of two parts: an inner nucleus pulposus (NP) and an outer annulus fibrosus (AF) (AF) (Wang et al., 202). The central NP is a site of collagen secretion and contains numerous proteoglycans (PG), which aid in water retention and create hydrostatic pressure to resist axial spine compression. The NP is primarily made up of type 11 collagen, which accounts for 20% of its total dry weight (Wang et al., 2019). The AF, on the other hand, uses a low amount of PG to keep the NP in the center of the disc; 70% of its dry weight is made up of primarily concentric type 1 collagen fibers. In LDH, narrowing of the space available for the thecal sac can occur as a result of disc protrusion through an AF, NP extrusion through the AF while still maintaining continuity with the disc space, or complete loss of continuity with the disc space and sequestration of a free fragment (Wang et al., 2019). This condition is thought to be inherited in approximately 75% of cases; other risk factors include dehydration and Axial Overloading. The role of inflammatory signaling in the production of nerve pain LDH is well known. Radicular pain, sensory abnormalities, and weakness in the distribution of one or more lumbosacral nerve roots are the primary signs and symptoms of LDH. This condition is detected using CT myelography and MRI (Amin, Andrade, & Neuman, (2017). Case 2: Ankle Pain Assignment

Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: The term “Lumbar Spinal Stenosis” refers to a narrowing of the spinal canal in the lower back (Fishchenko et al., 2018). Stenosis, or narrowing, can put pressure on the spinal cord or the nerves that connect the spinal cord to the muscles. In older people, lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is most commonly caused by degenerative changes. This condition is typically classified as either primary (caused by congenital abnormalities or a disorder of postnatal development) or secondary (acquired stenosis) when caused by degenerative changes or as a result of local infection, trauma, or surgery (Fishchenko et al., 2018). Anatomically, degenerative LSS can involve the central canal, lateral recess, foramina, or any combination of these locations (Fishchenko et al., 2018). A decrease in the anterior, posterior, transversal, or combined diameter of the central canal can occur as a result of disc height loss, bulging of the intervertebral disc, and hypertrophy of the facet joints and ligamentum flavum Fishchenko et al., 2018). Fibrosis is the most common cause of ligament flavum hypertrophy and is caused by accumulated mechanical stress, particularly along the dorsal aspect of the ligament flavum. The most common symptom associated with LSS is neurogenic claudication, also known as pseudo claudication. Neurogenic claudication refers to leg symptoms that affect the buttocks, groin, and anterior thigh, as well as radiating down the leg to the feet (Wang et al., 2019). Leg symptoms can include fatigue, heaviness, weakness, and/or paresthesia, in addition to pain. The symptoms can be unilateral or bilateral and symmetrical, which is more common. The patient may experience accompanying back pain, but leg pain and discomfort are usually more bothersome (Wang et al., 2019). Case 2: Ankle Pain Assignment

Lumbar Strain/Sprain: The lumbar spine relies on soft tissues to keep the body upright and to support weight from the upper body. When the lower back muscles or soft tissues are overstressed, they can become injured and painful. Lumbar sprain happens when ligaments become overstretched or torn. Ligaments are fibrous, tough tissues that connect bones. Sudden lower back pain is the most common symptom of a lumbar strain. Lower back spasms cause more severe pain, and the lower back feels sore to the touch. Diagnostic procedures for low back pain may include an X-ray, CT scan, and MRI, in addition to a thorough medical history and physical exam (AANS, 2020).

Sciatica: Low back pain is one of the most common conditions seen in clinical practice. Low back pain has significant direct and indirect costs, and it is a common cause of missed work. Sciatica, also known as radiculopathy, is caused by something pressing on the sciatic nerve, which runs through the buttocks and down the back of the leg. Sciatica patients may experience shock-like or burning low back pain, as well as pain through the buttocks and down one leg (AHRQ, 2016).

Spondylolisthesis: It is a spinal condition that affects the spinal bones. This disease causes one of the lower vertebrae to slip forward onto the bone directly beneath it (Genev et al., 2017). It’s a painful condition but treatable in most cases. The symptoms of spondylolisthesis vary. People with mild cases may not have any symptoms. However, those with severe cases may be unable to perform daily activities. Some of the most common symptoms are persistent lower back pain, stiffness in the back and legs, lower back tenderness, thigh pain, and tight hamstring and buttock muscles (Genev et al., 2017). Physical exams are the first step in diagnosing this condition. X-rays of the lower spine are crucial for determining whether a vertebra is out of place. A CT scan may also be ordered if the misplaced bone is pressing on the nerves. The treatment for spondylolisthesis depends on the severity of pain and vertebra slippage. Common nonsurgical treatment methods include wearing a back brace, doing physical therapy exercises, taking anti-inflammatory drugs, or using epidural steroid injections. Surgery may be required if other treatments fail. Case 2: Ankle Pain Assignment

 

Assessing Musculoskeletal Pain

Musculoskeletal pain primarily affects a person’s quality of life through factors such as sleep deprivation, fatigue, depression, and activity restrictions. The set effects are also influenced by contextual factors such as comorbidity, arthritis coping efficiency, and access to care (AANS, 2020). This implies that musculoskeletal (MSK) pain evaluation requires a set of bio-psychosocial perspectives that include pain, baseline effects, and contextual factors.

Back pain nerve roots exhibit a multifaceted, heterogeneous state in which both nociceptive and neuropathic pain mechanisms may be involved. The pain is caused by the activation of nociceptors that innervate ligaments, joints, muscles, fascia, and tendons. This is due to the body’s reaction to tissue injury or even inflammation, in combination with biomechanical stress. The neuropathic pain is caused by an injury or illness that affects the nerve roots innervating the spine as well as the lower limbs, and also pathological invasive innervation within the damaged lumbar discs (Baron et al., 2016).

Within physical assessments, symptoms can be centralized (change in pain along the far end of the entire length of the body region). (A positive test is used to rule out a diagnosis.) Physical examination of the facet joint can also be performed based on centralization and lack of relief from recumbency. The other test is one that centralizes the sacroiliac joint (Peterson et al., 2017). The following test is disc herniation with root involvement, where the dermatological distribution, which mirrors neurological results, improves the set specificity of the outcomes. Spondylolisthesis, fracture, myofascial pain, peripheral nerve, and central sensitization are some of the other tests available. Case 2: Ankle Pain Assignment

References

American Association of Neurological Surgeon. (2020). Low Back Strain and Sprain. Retrieved

ans.org/en/Patients/Nrurosurgical-Conditions-and-Treatment/Low-Back-Strain-and-

Sprain#:

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). (2016). Noninvasive Treatments for Low

Back Pain: Current State of the Evidence. Retrieved from

https://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/bac-pain-treatment/clinician.

Allegri, M., Montella, S., & Slici, F. (2016). Mechanisms of low back pain: a guide for diagnosis

and therapy. F1000 Research. httpS://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.8105.1

Amin, R. M., Andrade, N. S., & Neuman, B. J. (2017). Lumbar Disc Herniation. Current review

in musculoskeletal medicine, 10(4), 507-516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-017-9441-4

Baron, R., Binder, A., Attal, N., Casale, R., Dickenson, A. H., & Treede, R. D. (2016).

Neuropathic low back pain in clinical practice. European Journal of Pain, 20(6), 861-

  1. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.838

Genev, I.K., Tobin, M. K., & Zaidi, S. P. (2017). Spinal Compression Fracture Management: A

Review of Current Treatment Strategies and Possible Future Avenues. Global Spine

Journal, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1583288

Peterson, T., Laslett, M., & Juhl, C. (2017). Clinical classification in low back pain: best

Evidence diagnostic rules based on systematic reviews. BMC Musculoskeletal

             Disorders, 18(188). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1549-6

Wang, F., dong, Z., Li, Y. -P., Miao, D. -C., Wang, L. -F., & Shen, Y. (2019). Wedge-shaped

Vertebrae is a risk factor for symptomatic upper lumbar disc herniation. Journal of

Orthopedic Surgery and Research, 14(1). Retrieved from

https://doi.org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1186/s130-019-13147 Case 2: Ankle Pain Assignment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

What knowledge did you gain about this group that you were not aware of? How will this knowledge change the way you care for this cultural group?

Pick a cultural group (different from yours) that you commonly care for at work. Research the answers to the following…Health beliefs and practices Family patterns Communication style Space orien

Pick a cultural group (different from yours) that you commonly care for at work. Research the answers to the following…

  1. Health beliefs and practices
  2. Family patterns
  3. Communication style
  4. Space orientation
  5. Time orientation
  6. Nutritional Patterns
  7. Pain Responses
  8. Childbirth and perinatal care

    ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

  9. Death and Dying

  10. Spirituality, religion, and faith (include holy days)
  11. Prayer and meditation

What knowledge did you gain about this group that you were not aware of? How will this knowledge change the way you care for this cultural group?

This paper should include 2 outside references and your book. This paper should be at least 2000 words (this does not include the title page and reference page).

How do you address the concerns of your staff who do not have a computer and are scared of them?

Create a Power Point Presentation to discuss the following:You have been asked to implement a new computer charting system within your hospital. The staff at the hospital has been using paper charting

Create a Power Point Presentation to discuss the following:

You have been asked to implement a new computer charting system within your hospital. The staff at the hospital has been using paper charting and the staff’s age range is from 20 to 72. You will need to address the following:

  1. Who would you want on your team to help you as you implement this change and why? (interdisciplinary team)
  2. What should you consider when communicating this change to staff? How should the change be communicated to staff? (in-service, shift meeting)

    ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

  3. How are you going to implement the change, handle resistance, and be the change agent?

  4. What issues do you need to address about the use of technology within the hospital? (security, website surfing, documentation)
  5. What type of technology would you like to see (tablets, laptops, PC’s) why?
  6. How do you address the concerns of your staff who do not have a computer and are scared of them?

Power Point should include at least 3 outside references and the textbook. It should include title and reference slides and be 14-20 slides.  

TOPIC: Disaster planning/preparedness in a health care setting

TOPIC: Disaster planning/preparedness in a health care settingIntroduction (120 words) Objectives: Three objectives      you intend to address in the proposed risk management educational session

TOPIC: Disaster planning/preparedness in a health care setting

  1. Introduction (120 words)
  2. Objectives: Three objectives      you intend to address in the proposed risk management educational session.      (70 words)
  3. Rationale: Rationale for each      objective (i.e., Why are these three objectives key or core to the risk      management issue?). (70 words)

    ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

  4. Supportive Data: Data to support the need for the proposed educational session (150 words).
  5. Implementation Strategies: How will you implement the proposed educational session? (150 words).
  6. Evaluation Strategies: What tools will you use to evaluate the proposed educational session? (70 words)
  7. Challenges and Opportunities: Ideas or suggestions about areas of focus regarding risk management the      organization could or should address moving forward into the future? (70 words)

Total of 700 words. APA format is required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines.

MINIMUM OF 3 REFERENCES, CHECK PLAGIARISM PLEASE. I WILL SUBMIT IN TURNITIN. PLEASE FOLLOW ALL INSTRUCTIONS.