Evaluation and Linking Evidence-Based Practice to Clinical Outcomes

Week 5: Discussion Question

Answer the question based on PICOT mention below

PICOT question: Use of sertraline versus sertraline with CBT (cognitive behavioral therapy) to treat depression in teenagers age 12-18 over a 1-year period of time. – Approved by Dr. S Evaluation and Linking Evidence-Based Practice to Clinical Outcomes.

Discussion Prompt

Discuss how your research inquiry relates to evidence-based practice. What practice improvement outcomes do you expect your inquiry to accomplish? How do you intend to evaluate your capstone project?

Expectations

Initial Post:

Due: Thursday, 11:59 pm PT
Length: A minimum of 250 words, not including references
Citations: At least two high-level scholarly reference in APA from within the last 5 years

Week 5: capstone project paper continues

Methods/Design, Statistical Analysis

Write paper based on PICOT mention below

Assignment Prompt

Submit 3-4 pages describing the Methods/Design and Statistical Analysis that you will use in your project. Use the evidence from the peer reviewed articles that you have critically appraised and synthesized. Follow APA format and cite references. Include the following:

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

Describe the evaluative criteria (indicators or variables) to be addressed in answering each evaluation question.
Describe the research approaches to be used to answer each question and why they are appropriate to the evaluation questions posed.
Describe in specific detail how data will be collected related to each of your evaluative criteria/indicators. Discuss exactly how the data be collected, when, and by whom. Describe any data collection tools in terms of their development and appropriateness in answering the evaluation questions. Provide information on validity and reliability of tools, if available. Explain why the data collection methods are appropriate to the research approach, type of data, and purpose of the evaluation.
Describe how you will analyze the data, including specific statistical tests to be used. Include dummy data tables if applicable to show how you will display your findings Evaluation and Linking Evidence-Based Practice to Clinical Outcomes.

Expectations

Due: Monday, 11:59 pm PT
Length: 3-4 pages not including reference and title page.
Format: APA 7th ed.
Research: At least two- three peer reviewed reference within the last 5 years

Rubric

Criteria	Superior	Above Average	Competent	Below Standard	Far Below Standard	Criterion Score
Objective/Health Care Problem	5 points Objective is precise, knowledgeable, significant, and distinguished from alternate or opposing options.	4 points Objective is precise and knowledgeable.	3 points Objective is acceptable.	2 points Objective may be unclear or irrelevant.	1 point Objective is missing.	Score of Objective/Health Care Problem, / 5
Scope/Evidence	5 points Skillfully arranges evidence to setup premise of the issue. Persuasively builds the case with supportive evidence. Elaborates on all key points of the issue.	4 points Clearly sets up premise of the issue. Persuasively builds the case. Covers key points of the issue.	3 points Sets up premise of issue. Sufficiently persuasive to the case. Adequate development of key issues.	2 points Poorly sets up the premise of the issue Minimally persuasive to the case. Poor development of key issues.	1 point No premise set up. Not persuasive to the case. Absence of key issues.	Score of Scope/Evidence, / 5
Analysis	5 points Skillful recommendations and/or specific action. Suggested action is reasonable.	4 points Clear recommendations and/or specific action. Suggested action is reasonable	3 points Sufficient recommendations and/or specific action. Suggested action is reasonable.	2 points Vague about specific action. Action minimally reasonable.	1 point Absence of specific action. Action completely unreasonable.	Score of Analysis, / 5
Conclusion/Evaluation	5 points Conclusion is precise, knowledgeable, significant, and distinguished from alternate or opposing options. Skillfully implicates impact on nursing practice, patient safety and healthcare quality.	4 points Conclusion is precise knowledgeable and significant. Clearly states impact on nursing practice, patient safety and healthcare quality.	3 points Conclusion is appropriate. Provides a basic explanation of the impact on nursing practice, patient safety and healthcare quality.	2 points Conclusion may be unclear or irrelevant. Vague references regarding impact.	1 point Conclusion and/or impact is missing.	Score of Conclusion/Evaluation, / 5
Integration of Knowledge	5 points Demonstrates understanding and applies concepts learned in the course at a superior level. Concepts are integrated into insights. Provides concluding remarks that show analysis and synthesis of ideas Evaluation and Linking Evidence-Based Practice to Clinical Outcomes.	4 points Demonstrates understanding and applies concepts learned in the course. Conclusions are supported in reflection.	3 points Demonstrates, for the most part, understanding and applies concepts learned in the course. Some of the conclusions, however, are not supported.	2 points Demonstrates, to a certain extent, understanding and applies some concepts learned in the course.	1 point Does not demonstrates full understanding of concepts learned in the course.	Score of Integration of Knowledge, / 5
Writing Style, Formatting and Conventions	5 points Appropriate references that support opinions and recommendations. Exceptional writing with no grammar, APA or spelling errors	4 points Appropriate references that support opinions and recommendations. Excellent writing with minimal grammar, APA or spelling errors	3 points Appropriate references that support opinions and recommendations. Sufficient writing with minor, APA or spelling errors	2 points Minimal references and support for opinion on policy and recommendations for changes. Many APA/Grammar and/or spelling errors.	1 point Opinions and recommendations not well supported, Poor APA/Grammar and /or spelling	Score of Writing Style, Formatting and Conventions, / 5

Criteria

Superior

Above Average

Competent

Below Standard

Far Below Standard

Criterion Score

Objective/Health Care Problem

5 points

Objective is precise, knowledgeable, significant, and distinguished from alternate or opposing options.

4 points

Objective is precise and knowledgeable.

3 points

Objective is acceptable.

2 points

Objective may be unclear or irrelevant.

1 point

Objective is missing.

Score of Objective/Health Care Problem,

/ 5

Scope/Evidence

5 points

Skillfully arranges evidence to setup premise of the issue.

Persuasively builds the case with supportive evidence.

Elaborates on all key points of the issue.

4 points

Clearly sets up premise of the issue.

Persuasively builds the case.

Covers key points of the issue.

3 points

Sets up premise of issue.

Sufficiently persuasive to the case.

Adequate development of key issues.

2 points

Poorly sets up the premise of the issue

Minimally persuasive to the case.

Poor development of key issues.

1 point

No premise set up.

Not persuasive to the case.

Absence of key issues.

Score of Scope/Evidence,

/ 5

Analysis

5 points

Skillful recommendations and/or specific action. Suggested action is reasonable.

4 points

Clear recommendations and/or specific action. Suggested action is reasonable

3 points

Sufficient recommendations and/or specific action. Suggested action is reasonable.

2 points

Vague about specific action.

Action minimally reasonable.

1 point

Absence of specific action.

Action completely unreasonable.

Score of Analysis,

/ 5

Conclusion/Evaluation

5 points

Conclusion is precise, knowledgeable, significant, and distinguished from alternate or opposing options. Skillfully implicates impact on nursing practice, patient safety and healthcare quality.

4 points

Conclusion is precise knowledgeable and significant.

Clearly states impact on nursing practice, patient safety and healthcare quality.

3 points

Conclusion is appropriate.

Provides a basic explanation of the impact on nursing practice, patient safety and healthcare quality.

2 points

Conclusion may be unclear or irrelevant.

Vague references regarding impact.

1 point

Conclusion and/or

impact is missing.

Score of Conclusion/Evaluation,

/ 5

Integration of Knowledge

5 points

Demonstrates understanding and applies concepts learned in the course at a superior level. Concepts are integrated into insights. Provides concluding remarks that show analysis and synthesis of ideas Evaluation and Linking Evidence-Based Practice to Clinical Outcomes.

4 points

Demonstrates understanding and applies concepts learned in the course. Conclusions are supported in reflection.

3 points

Demonstrates, for the most part, understanding and applies concepts learned in the course. Some of the conclusions, however, are not supported.

2 points

Demonstrates, to a certain extent, understanding and applies some concepts learned in the course.

1 point

Does not demonstrates full understanding of concepts learned in the course.

Score of Integration of Knowledge,

/ 5

Writing Style, Formatting and Conventions

5 points

Appropriate references that support opinions and recommendations. Exceptional writing with no grammar, APA or spelling errors

4 points

Appropriate references that support opinions and recommendations. Excellent writing with minimal grammar, APA or spelling errors

3 points

Appropriate references that support opinions and recommendations. Sufficient writing with minor, APA or spelling errors

2 points

Minimal references and support for opinion on policy and recommendations for changes. Many APA/Grammar and/or spelling errors.

1 point

Opinions and recommendations not well supported, Poor APA/Grammar and /or spelling

Score of Writing Style, Formatting and Conventions,

/ 5

Evaluation and Linking Evidence-Based Practice to Clinical Outcomes

Posts