UCLA Health & Medical Discussion

UCLA Health & Medical Discussion

Description

 

 

PT 1 75 words

Discuss the health care administration barrier or issue you want to address for your capstone project paper. Barrier/issue/topic

HEALTH PROFESSIONAL SHORTAGE

Discuss the health care administration barrier or issue you want to address for your capstone project paper. Briefly explain the proposed change plan for the problem or issue. Find a peer-reviewed article that demonstrates support for the problem or issue you proposed. Post the article using APA format. Provide two or three sentences for the article that explain why the article supports your proposed plan. UCLA Health & Medical Discussion

ORDER  A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER  NOW

Describe the “project assumptions” you have identified in your Logic Model. Why have you made these assumptions? What evidence exists to support your assumptions?

As you are working to identify your topic, please consider possible barriers. For example, how do you as a leader leverage technology in a pandemic or other situation where direct contact is hindered or restricted and access become unrealistic? Consider all gaps and ways in which you could address those gaps.

Explain how previous research or literature helped provide support for your proposed solution. Identify the primary reason your proposed solution will be different than an example of a limitation or failed solution from the literature. Reference the article(s) you used.

Comparison

work/occupation: Disability claim manager for Cigna

·        Compare and contrast 2 learning theories that are applicable to your field of study/work explaining how and why the learning theories are subjectable to your communication skills. UCLA Health & Medical Discussion

·        This hyperlink of Learning Theories provides a listing of some theories you will come across. http://www.emtech.net/learning_theories.htm

 

Explanation & Answer:

2 pages

Capella University FlexPath Preparation Plan

Capella University FlexPath Preparation Plan

Description

Develop a FlexPath preparation plan to help you feel confident and ready to begin your FlexPath program.It’s important to begin any new endeavor feeling confident in your ability to be successful, and knowing the resources and support you can turn to when you need them.By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate proficiency in the following course competency and assessment criteria:

Competency 1: Demonstrate readiness to begin a FlexPath program.

  • Discuss potential challenges of being a FlexPath learner and ways to address them.

Describe how to use personal skills, knowledge, and reasons for choosing FlexPath to be a successful FlexPath learner.

  • Explain how the resources provided by Capella can assist in being a successful FlexPath learner.

Identify topics to discuss with a FlexPath Coach.

  • What’s your plan? The beginning of a degree program is full of excitement as you consider what the future may hold for you. Completing this assessment will help you channel that excitement into a realistic plan to be as prepared as possible for your new role—that of a successful FlexPath learner.Although the preparation and directions listed below are specific to this assessment, the process they lead you through is similar to what you will do in every FlexPath academic course.
  • Preparation
    To prepare for this assessment:
  • Review the FlexPath Prep Plan Scoring Guide to see the criteria by which this assessment will be evaluated.
  • Review the FlexPath Prep Plantemplate.
  • Estimate the time it will take you to complete your plan and then set your target date.
  • Remember that you should plan to submit the assessment no later than the Tuesday prior to the date your first academic course starts. Capella University FlexPath Preparation Plan

    ORDER  A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER  NOW

Give yourself plenty of time to thoughtfully consider the questions it poses and draft your responses. Although you will submit your plan for evaluation in this practice course, remember that you are creating the plan to use as you begin your first academic course. The more thought you put into it, the more useful it will be.

Instructions
Step 1: Complete the assessment
Open the FlexPath Prep Plantemplate:

Use the template to complete your assessment. Type your responses within the spaces provided in the template.

  • Save your work as a Word document using the file naming conventions listed in the Assessments Attempt tab.
  • Step 2: Review your work
    Review your work before submitting the plan. Do you see anything you want to change or add? Is the grammar and spelling correct? Revise the plan until you are satisfied with it and review the FlexPath Prep Plan Scoring Guide to be sure you have met the criteria.Step 3: Submit your assessment
    Attach your Word document to this assessment and submit it. To do that, complete the following:

Click the Submit Assessment button located at the bottom of this page.

  • Click on Submit Assessment (Attempt 1).

In the assessment area, click Browse My Computer to locate and attach your document to this assessment.

  • Click Submit.
  • Step 4: Review your feedback
    Your facilitator will evaluate your plan according to the scoring guide and return it within two business days for you to review. You will see an alert on your Campus dashboard when your assessment has been reviewed by the facilitator. To see the facilitator feedback, complete the following:
  • Click on the Assessment 1 tab.

Click on the Attempt tab to view your feedback.

Step 5: Complete this course
If you have demonstrated sufficient performance, select Complete This Course in the left navigation menu of the courseroom. Click the blue Complete This Course to complete this practice course. This button will activate upon completing the assessment and checking your feedback.Congratulations and welcome to FlexPath!Additional Requirements. Capella University FlexPath Preparation Plan

FlexPath Prep Plan

 

For this assessment, you will create a personal FlexPath Prep Plan.

 

Remember that this plan is truly for you. Creating it will help you:

  • Recognize the knowledge, skills, and strengths you bring to your FlexPath experience.
  • Think about what you may need to change to succeed in FlexPath.
  • Create a realistic plan for fitting FlexPath course work into your life.
  • Prepare for your first meeting with your FlexPath coach.
  • Begin your first academic course feeling prepared.

 

For each question below, think about what you know about yourself and consider what you have learned in orientation. Use this document and fill in the spaces. Answer each question as completely as possible, using complete sentences. You should be able to write at least 3–4 well-constructed sentences for each bullet point.

 

  • Now that you have been through FlexPath orientation, what seems new and different about the FlexPath model, and what adjustments will you need to make to be successful in this model?
    • Are there things about the FlexPath model that may be a challenge for you, or that make you apprehensive?
Write your response here.
  • How will you schedule time in your already-busy life to complete the assessments and be successful in FlexPath?
    • What things might possibly interfere with your schedule and how will you address them?
Write your response here.

 

  • What skills, knowledge, and strengths do you feel you bring to the FlexPath program?
    • How can use your skills, knowledge, and strengths to be successful in FlexPath?
Write your response here.
  • What was the most important factor (cost savings, time to completion, self-directed) in your decision to enroll in FlexPath?
    • How will that factor help you stay on track?
Write your response here.
  • How will you use each of the resources below to help you be successful in your FlexPath courses?
    • FlexPath Coach.
    • FlexPath Faculty
    • Capella Writing Center.
    • Capella University Library.
    • Progress Tracker.
    • Academic Plan.
Write your response here.
  • What questions would you like to discuss with your FlexPath Coach during your first call?
    • Examples:
      • Subscription billing.
      • Planning courses.
      • Transfer credit.
      • Financial aid (or other types of tuition assistance).
      • Academic engagement.
      • Assessment feedback and resubmission.
      • Research and writing skills.
      • Taking time off.
Write your responses here.

When you have completed this assessment, save it as a Word document following the naming conventions listed in the assessment area in the courseroom. Attach the document to the assessment box and submit. Capella University FlexPath Preparation Plan

 

 

 

 

 

 

Walden University Code of Ethics Discussion

Walden University Code of Ethics Discussion

Question Description

I’m working on a health & medical discussion question and need support to help me learn.

Discussion: Codes of Ethics

From education to religion, the use of ethical practice codes is widespread in civil society. Codes of ethics help clarify roles and responsibilities within a profession and serve as a standard of conduct for its members. In healthcare, like other professions, codes of ethics form the bedrock of professional practice.

In the Discussion, you will examine various codes of ethics and their role in healthcare. You will also select a specific code of ethics that best fits the ethical framework from which you live your life, and then explain why you chose it.

To prepare for this Discussion:

  • Review the codes of ethics (i.e, Hippocratic Oath, American Association of Medical Assistance, and Principles of Medical Ethics: American Medical Association, National Commission for Health Education Credentialing) in Chapter 1 in the Judson and Harrison textbook.
  • Select one of the codes that best reflects your personal ethical framework (philosophy). Walden University Code of Ethics Discussion

    ORDER  A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER  NOW

BY DAY 4

Post a comprehensive response to the following:

  • What roles do codes of ethics play in healthcare? Be specific and provide examples.
  • Choose one of the codes of ethics listed (i.e., Hippocratic Oath, American Association of Medical Assistance, and Principles of Medical Ethics: American Medical Association) that best reflects your ethical framework (philosophy).
  • Provide a brief description of the code that you selected and then explain why it best fits your personal ethical framework. Be specific and provide examples.
  • What factors impact your own personal “code of ethics?” For example, if your mother works as a Hospice nurse, you may have some specific thoughts on end-of-life issues. Walden University Code of Ethics Discussion

Support your Discussion and peer responses with in-text citations and references from specific Learning Resources.

Health & Medical Question Assignment

Health & Medical Question Assignment

Description

 

Discussion Prompt 1:

  • Explain why nitroglycerine is usually not given orally and why different routes of administration are utilized. What effect do the different routes of administration have on the bioavailability of the drug.

Response Prompt 1:

  • Identify and describe another drug that is not given orally and explain why. How does the alternate route of administration affect bioavailibity?

    ORDER  A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER  NOW

Main Posting: Response to the discusion question is reflecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

44 (44%) – 44 (44%)

  • Thoroughly responds to the discusion question(s)

    • Is reflecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

    • Supported by at least 3 current, credible sources

40 (40%) – 43 (43%)

  • Responds to the discusion question(s)

    • Is reflecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module.

    • 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth

    • Supported by at least 3 credible references

35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

  • Responds to most of the discusion question(s)

    • Is somewhat reflecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module.

    • 50% of post has exceptional depth and breadth

    • Supported by at least 3 credible references. Health & Medical Question Assignment

31 (31%) – 34 (34%)

  • Responds to some of the discusion question(s)

    • One to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addresed

    • Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis

    • Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

    • Post is cited with fewer than 2 credible references

(0%) – 30 (30%)

  • Does not respond to the discusion question(s)

    • Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria

    •lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis

    • Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

    • Contains only 1 or no credible references

Main Posting: Writing

(6%) – 6 (6%)

  • Written clearly and concisely

    • Contains no grammatical or spelling errors

    • Fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style

5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)

  • Written clearly and concisely

    • May contain one or no grammatical or spelling error

    • Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style

(5%) – 5 (5%)

  • Written concisely

    • May contain one to two grammatical or spelling error

    • Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style

4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)

  • Writtten somewhat concisely

    • May contain more than two2 spelling or grammatical errors

    • Contains some APA formatting erros

(0%) – 4 (4%)

  • Not written clearly or concisely

    • Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors

    • Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style

Main Posting: Timely and full participation

10 (10%) – 10 (10%)

  • Meets requirements for timely and full participation

    • Posts main discussion by due date

(0%) – 0 (0%)

(0%) – 0 (0%)

(0%) – 0 (0%)

(0%) – 6 (6%)

  • Does not meet requirement for full participation

First Reponse

Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.

(9%) – 9 (9%)

  • Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings

    • Responds to questions posed by faculty

    • The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives

8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%)

  • Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings

7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%)

  • Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting

6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)

  • Response is on topic, may have some depth

(0%) – 6 (6%)

  • Reponse may not be on topic, lacks depth

First Reponse: Writing

(6%) – 6 (6%)

  • Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues

    • Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed

    • Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources

    • Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English

5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)

  • Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues

    • Response to faculty questions are answered if posed

    • Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources

    • Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English

(5%) – 5 (5%)

  • Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues

    • Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed

    • Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources

    • Response is written in Standard Edited English

4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)

  • Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication

    • Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed

    • Few or no credible sources are cited

(0%) – 4 (4%)

  • Responses posted in the discussion lack effective

    • Response to faculty questions are missing

    • No credible sources are cited

First Reponse: Timely and full participation

(5%) – 5 (5%)

  • Meets requirements for timely and full participation

    • Posts by due date

(0%) – 0 (0%)

(0%) – 0 (0%)

(0%) – 0 (0%)

(0%) – 4 (4%)

  • Does not meet requirement for full participation

Second Reponse: Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.

(9%) – 9 (9%)

  • Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings

    • Responds to questions posed by faculty

    • The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives

8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%)

  • Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings

7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%)

  • Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting

6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)

  • Response is on topic, may have some depth

(0%) – 6 (6%)

  • Response may not be on topic, lacks depth

Second Reponse: Writing

(6%) – 6 (6%)

  • Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues

    • Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed

    • Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources

    • Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English

5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)

  • Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues

    • Response to faculty questions are answered if posed

    • Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources

    • Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English. Health & Medical Question Assignment

(5%) – 5 (5%)

  • Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues

    • Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed

    • Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources

    • Response is written in Standard Edited English

4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)

  • Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication

    • Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed

    • Few or no credible sources are cited

(0%) – 4 (4%)

>• Responses posted in the discussion lack effective

• Response to faculty questions are missing

• No credible sources are cited

Second Reponse: Timely and full participation

(5%) – 5 (5%)

  • Meets requirements for timely and full participation

    • Posts by due date

(0%) – 0 (0%)

(0%) – 0 (0%)

(0%) – 0 (0%)

(0%) – 0 (0%)

  • Does not meet requirement for full participation

Total Points: 100

Name: NRNP_6566_Week1_Discussion_Rubric

Communication and Mentoring

Communication and Mentoring

Individual Project

 Communication and Mentoring

 5-7 pages not including the cover and reference page

  • Write a paper that defines and describes what mentoring is and why it is so important to health care organizations.
  • Analyze the benefits and drawbacks of informal and formal mentoring programs and relationships.
  • Finally, discuss how a mentoring relationship has, or will, support your career development.

Please submit your assignment.

ORDER A PALGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

For assistance with your assignment, please use your text, Web resources, and all course materials.

Your assignment will be graded in accordance with the following criteria. Click here to view the grading rubric.

 

Tags: management healthcare management

Genomic and Regenerative Medicine Discussion Paper

Genomic and Regenerative Medicine Discussion Paper

7029BMS Lab Schedule 

Analysis of the effects of THP-1 derived exosomes on HepG2 cells

Exosomes are microscale extracellular vesicles that are present in most somatic fluids including blood and urine, as well as the media of cell cultures. These-lipid-bearing microvesicles range in size from 30 to 200 nm. They often contain key biomolecules like proteins and nucleic acids (both DNA and RNA) derived from their cell of origin. Recent studies support that exosomes are involved with intercellular communication, including between macrophages and cancer cells. E.g. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2020/ra/c9ra07332a#!divAbstract

and

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7290460/

and

https://www.cell.com/molecular-cell/fulltext/S1097-2765(10)00451-X?_returnURL=https%3A%2F%2Flinkinghub.elsevier.com%2Fretrieve%2Fpii%2FS109727651000451X%3Fshowall%3Dtrue#secd5383008e932

 

Exosomes therefore likely have important roles in health and various diseases.

 

Below is a set of procedures that have been put together to investigate if exosome-mediated communication between macrophages and liver cancer cells can induce changes in cell phenotypes/behaviour. In general, the instructions will be less detailed than those you followed in 7027BMS, as you are expected to take charge of your own preparation for lab sessions. You will need to read the required information before each session as well as seek additional information (and watch online videos if needed) to ensure you understand what you need to do before coming into the lab. The 7029BMS labs are designed to provide you with an experience similar to that you would encounter in a research lab, where you are expected to be independent and able to plan experiments yourself, often by adapting published procedures to your needs.

ORDER  A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER  NOW

Session 1

Purification of exosomes

(based on the protocol develop by https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3402/jev.v3.23430)

 

Work in a group of 3

  1. Collect a flask of THP-1 cells – this a non-adherent cell line that produces exosomes. These cells were cultured in a 5 ml culture flask in normal media (RPMI 1640 + 2 mM Glutamine + 10% Foetal Bovine Serum) before being treated with 0.5 nM phorbol myristate acetate (PMA) for 3 h and then placed by back in normal media for a further 24 h.
  2. Mix the cells and culture media in the flask gently and transfer to a clean centrifuge tube, spin the tube (with a suitable balance) for 5 minutes at 2000rpm to pellet the cells from the supernatant.
  3. Gently pour off the supernatant to a new tube and dispose of the cell pellet in the appropriate discard container. Place your tube with the supernatant on ice.
  4. Take the provided 10 ml of sepharose solution (sepharose CL-2B washed with PBS-citrate 0.32% (w/v) pH 7.4, 0.22 µm filtered) and gently swirl to resuspend. Gently pour the solution steadily into the provided syringe (capped at the end using parafilm) and allow to settle. NOTE – step 4 may have been done for you.
  5. As described in the publication above, load 1.5 ml of your supernatant onto the column, and elute with PBS-citrate 0.32% (w/v) immediately collecting fractions of a suitable amount (see paper link above to find this information) in eppendorf tubes. Make sure all tubes are labelled with fraction number. Keep the fractions on ice.
  6. Add around 5 ml more PBS-citrate 0.32% (w/v) to the column to wash it and let the flow through drip into a waste beaker. You can move to the next step while this drips through. Once the dripping has stopped, cap the end and add more PBS-citrate 0.32% (w/v) to prevent the column from drying out.
  7. Pick 3 fractions you think will contain exosomes (according to the paper above).
  8. Each member of the group will then pick and work with one of the 3 fractions from now on. Make sure your fraction tube is labelled with your name and fraction number.
  9. Transfer 0.25 ml of your fraction to another Eppendorf tube. This will be used for RNA extraction. Make sure this tube is also labelled with your name and fraction number and RNA.
  10. Give your 2 tubes to the academic who will store them at -80ºC until required. 

Session 2

Each student within the group from session 1 should process one of the fraction samples

 

PKH67 staining of THP-1 derived exosomes

  1. You will have a tube on your desk containing 1.5 µl of the dye PKH67. Add 0.2 ml of DILUENT C to this tube and mix the tube gently.
  2. Add 200 µl of the PKH67/DILUENT C mix to 200 µl of the fraction supernatant you identified that you think will contain exosomes and gently mix continually for 30 seconds using a 1 ml pipette (and blue tip). Incubate your tube at room temperature for 5 minutes.
  3. Quench by adding 0.4 ml 1% BSA in PBS. Incubate your tube at room temperature for 5 minutes.

 

Incubation of HepG2 cells with THP-1 exosomes for flow cytometry analysis

  1. Using the Cat 2 cabinets, add 0.4 ml of your labelled fraction to a flask of HepG2 cells. Control flasks where nothing is added will be analysed alongside your test samples on (i.e. you do not need to pick up a control flask). Clearly label your flask.
  2. Incubated at 37ºC until a later session where they will be analysed by flow cytometry

ORDER  A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER  NOW

Incubation of HepG2 cells with THP-1 exosomes for scratch wound healing assay

  1. Using the Cat 2 cabinets, add the remaining 0.4 ml of your labelled fraction to a well within a 6-well plate of HepG2 cells. A 2nd well will act as a control. Clearly label the wells. The other 4 wells will be used by other students (i.e. there will be 3 students per 6-well plate).
  2. Using a sterile 100 µl pipette tip (usually yellow), scratch a straight line down the middle of each well. Make sure to use a different pipette tip for each sample.
  3. Have a look at your plate under the microscope and take an image of each scratch (Time 0 timepoint). An academic will be at the microscope to show you how to do this.
  4. The plates will then be incubated 37ºC and images will be taken for you over the next 48hr.

 

 

 

 

 

Session 3

 

You will use the TaqMan MicroRNA Assay to assess the levels of miR-150 in your chosen exosome sample. Read information from below links:

TaqMan Small RNA Assays Quick Reference Card:

http://tools.thermofisher.com/content/sfs/manuals/cms_083619.pdf

 

Further information:

https://www.thermofisher.com/document-connect/document-connect.html?url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.thermofisher.com%2FTFS-Assets%2FLSG%2Fbrochures%2Fcms_078025.pdf&title=QXJ0aWNsZXMgJmFtcDsgV2hpdGUgUGFwZXJzOiBEZXNpZ24gUGlwZWxpbmUgZm9yIFRhcU1hbiZyZWc7IFNtYWxsIFJOQSBBc3NheXMgKFRlY2hOb3RlcyBhcnRpY2xlKQ==

 

General guide:

https://assets.thermofisher.com/TFS-Assets/LSG/manuals/4364031_TaqSmallRNA_UG.pdf

 

TaqMan™ MicroRNA Reverse Transcription Kit:

https://www.thermofisher.com/order/catalog/product/4366596#/4366596

 

TaqMan® Universal PCR Master Mix II, no UNG:

https://www.thermofisher.com/order/catalog/product/4440043#/4440043

 

TaqMan™ MicroRNA Assay:

https://www.thermofisher.com/order/catalog/product/4427975#/4427975

 

miR-150 specific RT primer and PCR probe and 2 primers:

https://www.thermofisher.com/order/genome-database/details/microrna/000473?CID=&ICID=&subtype=

 

U6 specific RT primer and PCR probe and 2 primers:

https://www.thermofisher.com/order/genome-database/details/microrna/001093?CID=&ICID=&subtype=

 

ThermoFisher Real-Time PCR (qPCR) Learning Center:

https://www.thermofisher.com/uk/en/home/life-science/pcr/real-time-pcr/real-time-pcr-learning-center.html

 

 

 

 

RNA extraction

  1. Add 0.5 ml of TRIzol reagent to the 0.25ml of fraction you put aside for RNA extraction in week 1.
  2. Incubate sample for 5 minutes at room temperature. Add 0.2 mL of chloroform per 1 mL of TRIzol used. Cap tube securely and shake vigorously by hand for 15 seconds.
  3. Incubate sample for 3 minutes at room temperature. Centrifuge sample at 13,000 RPM for 15 minutes at room temperature. Remember to have the centrifuge balanced (possibly with other peoples sample(s)). The sample will separate into a pale green, organic phase, an interphase, and a colourless upper aqueous phase.
  4. Transfer very carefully to another tube the phase that contains the RNA (you must find this information yourself if you are unsure which layer contains the RNA). Precipitate the RNA by mixing with cold isopropyl alcohol. Use 0.5 mL of isopropyl alcohol per 1 mL of TRIzol used. Incubate samples for 10 minutes at room temperature then centrifuge at 13,000 RPM for 10 minutes. Remember to have the centrifuge balanced.
  5. Remove the supernatant and wash the pellet once with 75% ethanol, adding 1 mL of ethanol per 1 mL of TRIzol used. Vortex samples and centrifuge at 13,000 RPM for 5 minutes. Remember to have the centrifuge balanced.
  6. Remove all ethanol, air-dry for 5 minutes, and then dissolve in 20 µl PCR water or DEPC-treated water by pipetting the solution up and down. Incubate for 10 minutes at 60°C if necessary.
  7. Quantify your RNA using the nanodrop and record your values (you will need to know the concentration when preparing your reverse transcription reactions)
  8. Ensure your tube is labelled with you name, fraction number and RNA.
  9. Keep samples on ice.

 

 

Reverse Transcription (RT)

  1. You will be given 15 μl of the master mix. Before the session, read the RT instructions from the TaqMan Small RNA Assays Quick Reference Card to ensure you understand the contents of the master mix that has been prepared for you.
  2. Add 7 μl of the master mix to 2 PCR tubes (smaller than eppendorfs).
  3. Follow the rest of the TaqMan Small RNA Assays Quick Reference Card protocol from step 3 (note- you are preparing single-stranded RNA, so follow d.). In terms of which RT primer to add to each tube: 2 tubes should be split as follows: Tube 1- RNA prep + miR-150 RT Primer; Tube 2- RNA prep + U6 snRNA RT Primer. Before the session, you will need to use your Nanodrop data to determine how much you have to dilute your RNA prep by (using DEPC-treated water) to have 1-10 ng total RNA in the reaction.
  4. Place your clearly labelled PCR tubes (smaller than Eppendorf tubes) in the ice bucket next to the thermal cycler.
  5. The thermal cycle will perform a run using the following conditions (will take about an hour):
  • Mode: Standard
  • Reaction volume: 15 µL
  • Thermal cycling conditions:

Step Time Temperature

Hold 30 minutes 16°C

Hold 30 minutes 42°C

Hold 5 minutes 85°C

Hold ∞ 4°C

Session 4

 

Flow cytometry analysis of HepG2 cells

  1. Using the Cat 2 cabinet, remove media from the plate and add to 15 ml falcon tube.
  2. Add 3 ml PBS to plate to wash cells, remove PBS and add to the media in the 15 ml falcon tube.
  3. Add 0.5 ml trypsin to plate and put to 37°C for 5 minutes
  4. Add 3 ml PBS, mix using the pipette and add cells/PBS to the 15 ml falcon tube
  5. Spin 1,000 RPM for 5 minutes, pour off supernatant, add 5 ml PBS and re-suspend cell pellet, then spin again 1,000 RPM for 5 minutes
  6. Pour off supernatant, add 5 ml PBS and re-suspend cell pellet, then spin again 1,000 RPM for 5 minutes
  7. Resuspend after your final spin in 1 ml PBS and place sample in a labelled Eppendorf tube.
  8. Take your sample to the BD Accuri flow cytometer and run your samples using count and FITC as your experimental axis, run 10 000 cells through for each run.
  9. Control samples (no exosomes added) will similarly be analysed.
  10. Save your data to a memory stick.

 

 

 

Quantitative PCR (qPCR) amplification of RT reaction samples

Before the session, read the Quantitative PCR (qPCR) amplification instructions from the TaqMan Small RNA Assays Quick Reference Card to see how to prepare required 4 tubes containing the reagents below:

  • TaqMan® Universal PCR Master Mix II, no UNG
  • Nuclease-free Water
  • TaqMan Small RNA Assay (20X) (1 probe and 2 primers for miR-150 OR 1 probe and 2 primers for U6 snRNA)
  • Product from RT reaction (one of the 4 tubes)

 

4 tubes will be set up for you containing 18.67 μl of a master mix containing all of the reagents except your product from the RT reaction:

  • Tube 1 miR-150 RT reaction with miR-150 Taqman Small RNA Assay – duplicate 1
  • Tube 2 miR-150 RT reaction with miR-150 Taqman Small RNA Assay – duplicate 2
  • Tube 3 U6 snRNA RT reaction with U6 snRNA Taqman Small RNA Assay – duplicate 1
  • Tube 4 U6 snRNA RT reaction with U6 snRNA Taqman Small RNA Assay – duplicate 2

 

  1. Follow the published instructions to add the correct RT reaction to each tube in the correct amount.
  2. Take the samples to an academic who will add them to a qPCR plate. Note- no template controls (i.e. water added instead of RT reaction) will also be run on the plate for both the miR-150 Taqman Small RNA Assay and U6 snRNA Taqman Small RNA Assay reactions.
  3. The qPCR will then be run as instructed in the “Set up and run the real–time PCR instrument” section of the general guide.
  4. Results will be uploaded onto Aula.

 

Howard University mHealth Solution SWOT Analysis

Howard University mHealth Solution SWOT Analysis

Description

SCENARIO

A director within a large integrated health network has expressed interest for a mHealth solution for her community-based patient population. She wants to ensure this solution could integrate with other health systems in the network. Her team wants to collect blood pressure data for newly diagnosed hypertensive patients requiring daily monitoring. A mHealth solution could reduce resource costs for the number of face-to-face visits required by nurses and improve patient outcomes with continuous monitoring. As a new intern at this health network, investigate one mHealth solution that could meet the director’s needs. Use the module readings, lectures and your own research to select the solution and provide support for the analysis. The director requests your results in the form of a SWOT analysis with discussion on how it will achieve improved clinical and business performance outcomes. Howard University mHealth Solution SWOT Analysis

ORDER  A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER  NOW

INSTRUCTIONS

Create a SWOT Analysis that includes:

  • Description of a selected mHealth solution including why it was chosen for this patient population
  • SWOT Analysis Model that bullets the items to be included in the subsequent analysis and discussions
  • Discussion of the outcome analysis of the strengths and opportunities for having this type of clinical data collected from a patient in the community
  • Discussion of the outcomes analysis of the threats/weaknesses on integrating community-based data into large integrated health network systems (e.g., clinical, financial, administrative) Howard University mHealth Solution SWOT Analysis

PHC 273 Saudi Electronic University Bipolar Disorder Essay

PHC 273 Saudi Electronic University Bipolar Disorder Essay

PAPER ASSIGNMENT-1 COVER SHEET

Course name: Introduction to Mental Health
Course number: PHC-273
Assignment title or task:

(You can write a question)

 

WRITE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF ANY FOUR MENTAL DISORDERS.                                    

Each description should include following points:

·         Definition                         (1 mark)

·         Signs and Symptoms    (0.5 mark)

·         Global Prevalence         (0.5 mark)

·         Prevalence in KSA         (0.5 mark)

 

***Instructions

·         Include data from the web to substantiate your answers to prevent rejection.

·         If plagiarism is found to be >80%, the assignment will not be considered and rejected without any further attempt being given. PHC 273 Saudi Electronic University Bipolar Disorder Essay

·         Each description of mental disorder comprises 2.5 marks.

·         Do not forget to mention your name & ID, instructor’s name, and the date of submission, failing to do so your assignment will not be considered as submitted.

Student Name:  
Student ID:  
CRN 25942 Branch Abha Males
Submission Date:  
Instructor name Dr. Sriram Chandramohan Total
Grade     out of 10

ORDER  A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER  NOW

Release Date: 04.04.2022

Due Date: 30.04.2022

  • Plagiarism policy: no plagiarism above 80% is accepted in the assignments. The student should write the assignment in their own words. Two identical assignments will be rejected with zero grades.
  • Citation: The students are required to use APA style of citation in their assignments.
  • The assignment should have the COVER PAGE with New SEU logo and the details of who is submitting and to whom is it submitted.
  • Naming the assignment file: student should use the following format for naming and uploading their assignment: Student name (Student ID) PHC273_Assignment name

Assignments with improper names and formats will be rejected.

  • Assignments should only be submitted through Blackboard only and not through email. If there is any technical issue in the BB, then it should be reported to BB support team. The screenshot of the problem and the assignment then can be sent to the instructor.
  • The submission of assignment must be done before the scheduled deadline.
    • Late assignments can be accepted only if the student informed the instructor before the assignment deadline is overdue of any acceptable reason of delay. PHC 273 Saudi Electronic University Bipolar Disorder Essay

 

Electronic Health Record Essay

Electronic Health Record Essay

Description

 

 

Your supervisor asked you to record the present paper-based medical system and list at least five advantages of the EHR-based health information as justification for the transition. Your assignment should be 3-5 APA formatted pages excluding the Cover and Reference pages. Electronic Health Record Essay

ORDER  A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER  NOW

Your supervisor also recommended you the following resources to consult.
Oachs, P. K and Watters, A. L. (2020). Chapter 26: Project Management. Health Information Management: Concepts, Principles and Practice. 6th Ed. AHIMA press.
Benefits of Electronic Health Record https://www.healthit.gov/topic/health-it-basics/benefits-ehrs
Project Planning for Beginners. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZWmXi3TW1yA
A Primer on Project Management in Healthcare. https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/ecpe/a-primer-on-project-management-for-health-care/
How to implement EHR https://www.healthit.gov/playbook/
What information the EHR contains https://www.healthit.gov/faq/what-information-does-electronic-health-record-ehr-contain
EMR vs EHR Differences https://www.healthit.gov/buzz-blog/electronic-health-and-medical-records/emr-vs-ehr-difference
Basic Project Management 101. https://www.thebalancecareers.com/project-management-101-2275338
Project Scope. https://www.projectmanager.com/blog/project-scope
What is a Project Scope: https://video.search.yahoo.com/yhs/search?fr=yhs-sz-001&hsimp=yhs-001&hspart=sz&p=project+scope#id=2&vid=f48b8ce62878854d58e78efcf8f7fcda&action=click Electronic Health Record Essay

HSM 497 NSU The Influence of Social Media on Drug Abuse Essay

HSM 497 NSU The Influence of Social Media on Drug Abuse Essay

Description

Subject: Illicit drug use has been increasing in the United States, especially among school-age children. What are some of the factors that contribute to substance use, misuse, or abuse in these children?

Protection of Human Rights

In the research proposal, you should specify clearly who the participants will be, how they will be chosen, how many will participate, and whether there will be any special characteristics to look for. A description of how the participant’s human rights will be protected should be included. You should emphasize the Institutional Review Board (IRB) criteria and procedures that have to be met in order to be granted approval prior to study execution. In addition, written informed consent should be discussed.

ORDER  A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER  NOW

Significance and Conclusion

You should discuss, in general, how your proposed research study has the potential to lead to a significant improvement over the reviewed related studies, and how it would benefit the field. (In other words, why should someone care? If you were applying for money to do this, why would someone fund you? If you wanted to publish your results, why would they be interesting?) HSM 497 NSU The Influence of Social Media on Drug Abuse Essay

Dr. Sam E. Elchoufani
Norfolk State University
HSM-497 Research Proposal Rubric
All Criteria Met Most Criteria
Met
Some Criteria
Met
Few Criteria
Met
No Criteria
Met
Category (5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Score
Title Page (1) Title of RP
(2) Names and
Group #
(3) Institution &
Course Info
(4) Professor’s
name & title
(5) Due Date
Evidence of four Evidence of three Evidence of two
or less
Absent
Problem Statement The problem
statement is
concise, includes
descriptor
variables
[independent
variables (IV) and
dependent
variables (DV)],
and informs the
reader of the
exact purpose of
the study
The statement of
the problem
includes most of
the descriptor
variables, and
informs the reader
of the exact
purpose of the
study
The statement of
the problem
includes one
descriptor
variable, and
informs the
reader of the
purpose of the
study
The statement of
the problem is
unclear and does
not include any
descriptor
variables
The statement of
the problem is
missing or is
unclear and
unable to be
interpreted
Purpose of Study Very clearly
stated purpose of
the study, and its
potential value is
demonstrated
Fairly well-stated
purpose of the
study, but its
potential value is
vaguely stated
Fairly stated
purpose of the
study, yet the
potential value is
absent
Vaguely stated
purpose of the
study, and the
potential value is
absent
Lacks a purpose
of the study
statement
Research Hypothesis Well-stated
research
hypothesis based
Fairly well-stated
research
hypothesis based
Stated hypothesis
is unclear based
Incomplete and/or
unfocused
Lacks a research
hypothesis
Dr. Sam E. Elchoufani
Norfolk State University
on the purpose of
the study
on the purpose of
the study
on the purpose of
the study
research
hypothesis
Literature Review Appropriate; not
only provides
sufficient
background
information, but
also a critique of
previous research
that points out
weaknesses,
conflicts, and
areas of needed
study
Appropriate;
reasonable
background
information
provided; the
critique points out
some, but not all
of the areas of
needed study
Appropriate;
provides most of
the background
information, but
does not critique
previous research
or point out areas
of needed study
Irrelevant;
vaguely mentions
some previous
work in the area;
no critique of
previous research
is provided
Irrelevant;
provides little or
no background
information and
does not critique
previous
research
Methodology and
Research Design
Organization of
evidence and
analysis is
exceptionally
clear and shows
relationships of
information
supporting the
proposal.
Contains
organized
information that
allows the
experiment(s) to
be replicated.
Research design
is well-described
and appropriate.
Organization of
evidence and
analysis reflects
clear relationships
of information
supporting the
proposal. Presents
experiments that
are replicable.
Research design is
well-described,
but may be
partially
appropriate.
Organization of
evidence and
analysis is
generally clear,
but may contain
flaws. Presents
some experiments
that are partially
replicable. Parts
of the research
design must be
inferred by the
reader, and may
not be
appropriate.
Organization of
evidence and
analysis is not
clear enough and
contains flaws.
Presents
experiments that
are marginally
replicable. The
research design is
ambiguous and
inappropriate. HSM 497 NSU The Influence of Social Media on Drug Abuse Essay
Organization of
information and
evidence in
support of the
proposal is
confusing, weak,
or nonexistent.
Describes the
experiment(s)
poorly in such a
non-scientific
way that they
cannot be
replicated. The
research design
is flawed and
inappropriate.
Subject Description and
Protection of Human
Rights
The proposal
specifies who the
participants will
be, how they will
The proposal
specifies most of
the descriptors
regarding
The proposal
specifies most of
the descriptors
regarding
The proposal
specifies a few of
the descriptors
regarding
The proposal
does not identify
participants’
characteristics;
Dr. Sam E. Elchoufani
Norfolk State University
be chosen, how
many will
participate, and if
there will be any
special
characteristics of
importance. A
description of
how the
participant’s
human rights will
be protected is
included.
participants, and
describes how
participants’
human rights will
be protected.
participants, but
does not describe
how the
participants’
human rights will
be protected.
participants, and
does not discuss
how the
participants’
human rights will
be protected.
no human rights
protection is
discussed.
Data Collection and
Analysis
Identifies the
techniques and/or
instruments used
in data collection
in the appropriate
chronology.
Describes
relevant statistical
measures, tests,
or tools
Identifies the
techniques and/or
instruments used
in data collection.
Describes
irrelevant
statistical
measures, tests, or
tools
Identifies some
techniques and/or
instruments used
in data collection.
Describes
irrelevant
statistical
measures, tests,
or tools
Fails to identify
the sources of
data and/or
instruments used
in data collection.
No description of
statistical
measures, tests, or
tools is provided.
Contains
plagiarized
information,
data, and/or
other contents
Writing Mechanics Very well-written
proposal with no
errors/typos
and/or sentence
errors. Adheres to
all the proposal
writing format
requirements as
presented in the
guidelines
Well-written
proposal with few
errors/typos.
Adheres to most
of the proposal
writing format
requirements as
presented in the
guidelines
Fairly written
proposal that
lacks clarity and
has poor
transition
sentences. There
are several
errors/typos
and/or sentence
errors. Adheres to
most of the
proposal writing
format
Fairly written
proposal that
lacks clarity and
has poor
transition
sentences. There
are several
errors/typos
and/or sentence
errors. Fails to
adhere to the
proposal writing
format as
Poorly written
proposal that
lacks
organization.
There are
multiple
errors/typos.
Fails to adhere
to the proposal
writing format
as presented in
the guidelines
Dr. Sam E. Elchoufani
Norfolk State University
requirements as
presented in the
guidelines
presented in the
guidelines
References Reference list is
relevant,
complete, and
broad enough to
support the
proposal; and is
in correct APA
format. Citations
are in correct
APA format and
linked to
reference list.
Reference list is
limited, but is in
correct APA
format. Citations
are in correct APA
format and linked
to reference list.
Reference list
includes
irrelevant articles,
but is in correct
APA format.
Citations may be
in correct APA
format, but
partially linked to
reference list.
Reference list is
incomplete and is
not in correct
APA format.
Citations may not
be in correct APA
format and are
NOT linked to
reference list. HSM 497 NSU The Influence of Social Media on Drug Abuse Essay
No Reference
list is included
Grade