Healthcare Emergency Manager Core Competencies Assignment

Healthcare Emergency Manager Core Competencies Assignment

Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
33
Appendix C
Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies:
Competency Framework Final Report 1
Joseph A. Barbera, MD, Anthony G. Macintyre, MD, Greg Shaw, DSc,
Valerie Seefried, MPH, Lissa Westerman, RN, Sergio de Cosmo, MS
Institute for Crisis, Disaster, and Risk Management
The George Washington University
October 11, 2007
Introduction
In December 2004, the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Emergency Management
Strategic Healthcare Group awarded the Institute for Crisis Disaster & Risk Management
(ICDRM) a contract to participate in establishing innovative training and personal
development curricula for the VHA Emergency Management Academy (VHA-EMA).
The objective of the project was to develop a nationally peer-reviewed, National Incident
Management System (NIMS) compliant, competency-based instructional outline and
curriculum content upon which to base education and training courses. The curriculum is
intended to educate VHA personnel for response and recovery in healthcare emergencies
and disasters, to provide a resource for future VHA training programs, and to be placed in
the public domain for use by other healthcare personnel.
The initial phase of the EMA project consisted of developing a competency framework
(competency definition, structure and format, and critical elements) followed by
development of peer-reviewed emergency response and recovery competencies for VHAselected healthcare system job groups. The competencies describe knowledge, skills, and
abilities essential for adequate job performance during the emergency response and
recovery phases of an incident. Peer review was accomplished through a web-based
survey of the proposed competencies, which was distributed to a select, nationwide
sampling of emergency management personnel who were identified as having extensive
experience or advanced expertise in healthcare emergency response. The survey process
was designed to obtain a balanced expert opinion as to whether the project team’s written
competencies were valid, and to assess the appropriate level of proficiency for each
primary competency (i.e., awareness, operations, or expert). The competencies developed
during this initial phase were then used to guide the development of learning objectives
for the instructional curriculum.
1
This report was supported by Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration contract
“Emergency Management Academy Development,” CCN20350A. The report is the work of the authors
and does not represent the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs or any of its employees.
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
34
An extensive research effort was conducted to understand the historical use of
competencies, and to establish objective criteria for competency development.
Historical development of competencies
Competency modeling originated in business management research, and has evolved
extensively over the past 25 years as other disciplines began adopting the practice.2
The
original intent of competency development was to enhance the then common “job
analysis” by relating a position’s requisite knowledge, skills and abilities to the overall
objectives of the organization in which the position existed. This approach aligns the
objectives (i.e., desired outputs) of individual jobs with the overall objectives of the
organization, such that organizational objectives are achieved through effective
individual job performance. While this was the original intent of competencies, their
definition varied widely as time progressed. Competency definitions range from
emphasizing underlying characteristics of an employee (e.g., a motive, trait, skill, aspects
of one’s self-image, social role, or a body of knowledge) that produce effective and/or
superior performance 3
to performance characteristics (i.e., how an employee conducted
their job in relation to the organization’s objectives). 4
The application of competencies across the many organizations that use them has also
varied widely. The private sector has commonly employed competencies to define
“superior performers”5
and therefore, as a selection tool for hiring, promotion, and/or
salary enhancement. In other organizations, competencies have been used for job-specific
performance feedback and improvement. Still others have used competencies to guide
future program training and development. Because of this variation in definition and
application, it becomes critically important to address these vagaries at the outset of any
competency development project. This concept was well-described by one competency
research team:
“The first step in the implementation of any competency-based management
framework must be the organizational consensus on how to define ‘competency.’
This agreed upon definition will drive the methodology used to identify and
assess the competencies within the organization.” 6
The GWU-ICDRM project team strongly agreed with this concept, and started the project
by defining how the competencies within this initiative would be applied:
2
Newsome, Shaun, Victor M Catano, and Arla L. Day. Leader Competencies: Proposing a Research
Framework. 2003. available at http://www.cleleadership.ca/paper/leader_competenciesproposing_a_research_framework.pdf
3
Boyatzis, Richard. The Competent Manager: A Model for Effective Performance New York: Wiley, 1982. 4
US Office of Personnel Management. Executive Core Qualifications (ECQ’s), accessed at
http://www.opm.gov/ses/ecq.asp
5
Klein AL. Validity and Reliability for Competency-based Systems: Reducing Litigation Risks.
Compensation Benefits and Review, 28, 31-37, 1996. cited in “Newsome, Shaun, Victor M Catano, and
Arla L. Day. Leader Competencies: Proposing a Research Framework. 2003. 6
Newsome, Shaun, Victor M Catano, and Arla L. Day. Leader Competencies: Proposing a Research
Framework. 2003. available at http://www.cleleadership.ca/paper/leader_competenciesproposing_a_research_framework.pdf
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
35
The project competencies are intended to serve as formative tools to guide
healthcare system personnel in developing knowledge, skills and abilities for
effective performance during emergency response and recovery. These
competencies are also intended to serve as a guide for developing preparedness
education and training, and therefore, to serve as a basis for the healthcare
emergency management curriculum. Finally, the competencies may be employed
as a tool for assessing the performance of individual healthcare personnel
performance during emergency response and recovery operations.
Defining a competency framework
Despite an extensive search of published articles related to competencies, the GWUICDRM project team determined that no single authoritative source presented a
consistent competency definition and competency framework to adequately support the
VHA-EMA project needs. A framework was therefore developed, analyzed through pilot
competency development, refined and completed before establishing the individual
emergency response and recovery competencies for this project. The competency
framework was therefore used to impose a strict methodological consistency when
developing and defining all competencies developed in this program. Central to this
framework is the critical importance of competencies being objective and measurable,
internally and externally consistent, and tightly described within the context of the
organization’s specific objectives.
Within this framework, the project team defined a “competency” as a specific knowledge
element, skill, and/or ability that is objective and measurable (i.e., demonstrable) on the
job. It is required for effective performance within the context of a job’s responsibilities,
and leads to achieving the objectives of the organization. Competencies are ideally
qualified by an accompanying proficiency level. 7
The GWU-ICDRM project team recognized the need to adapt the methods for
competency development, since the usual business approach to establishing competencies
is problematic for emergency management. Business management models establish
competencies by observing performance and relating it to individual and organizational
outputs. Because emergencies are rare events, and therefore emergency response and
recovery outputs occur very infrequently, the related competency framework and
definitions for this project are based less upon observed outputs. Instead, the basis is a
healthcare system’s emergency response and recovery objectives, together with the
NIMS-consistent incident command system8
structure and processes mandated for use by
all emergency response organizations in the U.S.9,10
7
GWU Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management. Emergency Management Glossary of Terms
(October 2007) available at www.gwu.edu/~icdrm/ 8
Fedral Emergency Management Agency. National Incident Management System (NIMS) (March 1, 2004),
available at: http://www.fema.gov/emergency/nims/index.shtm. 9
Bush GW. Homeland Security Presidential Directive (HSPD) -5: Management of Domestic Incidents
(February 28, 2003) accessed at http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/02/20030228-9.html
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
36
Response competencies in systems using the Incident Command System (ICS), therefore,
should be based upon the general incident objectives an organization has during incident
response, and upon the organizational structures, processes, and relationships with other
organizations that are used during response rather than those used during everyday
experience. Emergency competencies are commonly developed without this relationship
to a defined response system,11 making it difficult to define how scientific or medical
knowledge is to be implemented in an emergency response. In contrast, the GWUICDRM project team specifically incorporated the NIMS mandate to use ICS by
including reference to the NIMS/Incident Command System structure and processes
throughout the project’s emergency response and recovery project competencies.
Because of the anticipated large number of competencies, the project team also
established a “primary versus supporting competency” hierarchy to categorize the
individual competencies as they were developed. Designating “primary” and
“supporting” competencies helps to maintain a priority in the framework when listing a
large number of individual competencies. Supporting competencies are also a means to
more fully define and clarify the primary competencies.
Preparedness versus response and recovery competencies
Published articles describing emergency management competencies commonly do not
differentiate between preparedness and response competencies, and list them in an
intermixed fashion. 12,13 The GWU-ICDRM project team sought to maintain a separation
between these categories.
Preparedness competencies are commonly based upon everyday organizational
objectives, structure, processes, and relationships to other organizations. Preparedness is
unquestionably important, but for it to be accurate, comprehensive and successful in
establishing an effective emergency response capability, a thorough understanding of the
response system must be established first, and preparedness guided by this. It was
therefore reasoned by the project team that specific competencies for emergency response
should be established and validated first, and then used as the “end state” to guide the
development of valid preparedness competencies.
10 Barbera JA, Macintyre AG, et al. Emergency Management Principles and Practices for Healthcare
Systems, Unit 3, Lesson 3.1.1, accessed at http://www1.va.gov/emshg/page.cfm?pg=122 11 ATPM (Association of Teachers of Preventive Medicine) in collaboration with Center for Health policy,
Columbia University School of Nursing. Emergency Response Clinician Competencies in Initial
Assessment and Management, 2003, accessed at http://www.atpm.org/education/Clinical_Compt.html 12 INCMCE (International Nursing Coalition for Mass Casualty Education). Educational Competencies for
Registered Nurses Responding to Mass Casualty Incidents, 2003. Available at:
http://www.nursing.hs.columbia.edu/institutes-centers/chphsr/hospcomps.pdf 13 ACEP (American College of Emergency Physicians) and the U.S Department of Health & Human
Services, Office of Emergency Preparedness. Developing Objectives, Content, and Competencies for the
Training of Emergency Medical Technicians, Emergency Physicians, and Emergency Nurses to Care for
Casualties Resulting From Nuclear, Biological, or Chemical (NBC) Incidents, Final Report April 23, 2001.
American College of Emergency Physicians, Irving, Texas.
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
37
Because of these considerations, the initial project focus was response and recovery
competencies. Emergency management program competencies related to mitigation and
preparedness were developed later for the two job groups that are the initial focus of the
certification project.
Establishing appropriate levels of proficiency
Concurring with other authors that “competency” is not an all-or-none phenomenon, the
GWU-ICDRM project team established “proficiency levels” to address this issue in a
graduated fashion. Proficiency levels delineate the “The degree of understanding of the
subject matter and its practical application through training and performance…” 14 In
emergency management, proficiency indicates the level of mastery of knowledge, skills
and abilities (i.e., competencies) that are demonstrable on the job and lead to the
organization achieving its objectives. Levels of proficiency may therefore also be used to
describe the level of mastery that is the objective of and specific training or education
program. The final proficiency levels defined for this project are presented in Table 1.
Table 1. Definition of the Levels of Proficiency
Awareness
Represents an understanding of the knowledge/skills/abilities
encompassed by the competency, but not to a level of capability to
adequately perform the competency actions within the organization’s
system.
Operations Represents the knowledge/skills/abilities to safely and effectively
perform the assigned tasks and activities, including equipment use as
necessary
Expert Represents operations-level proficiency plus the additional
knowledge/skills/abilities to apply expert judgment to solve problems
and make complex decisions.
As core and job group competencies were developed, the project team qualified each
primary competency with an indicated level of proficiency (awareness, operations,
expert).
14 EMA. Urban Search & Rescue Incident Support Team Training: Student Manual. Module 1, Unit 4,
Page 6: Planning Process Overview. n/a:40. 4/16/2004, accessed at:
http://www.fema.gov/emergency/usr/usrist2.shtm
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
38
Developing emergency response and recovery competencies
Using the competency framework established in this project, response and recovery
“core” competencies were developed for all personnel within a healthcare system that
may have a role in the emergency response, regardless of their specific emergency
response and recovery function. Additional competencies were then established for three
functionally based job groups within a healthcare. The original designation for these job
groups were (1) healthcare facility leaders, (2) patient care providers, and (3) emergency
management program managers. The titles and definitions evolved with outside input as
the project tasks were accomplished (see Table 2 for final titles and descriptions).
Initial competency identification and development was accomplished through an analysis
of ICS as presented in NIMS, an extensive literature review, and an evaluation of the
VHA system and processes for emergency response. 15 Additionally, the GWU-ICDRM
project team relied upon their extensive emergency management and disaster response
experience, and upon related previous research efforts. 16,17,18
The emergency response and recovery competencies for the initially designated three job
groups were then fully developed, studied through a web-based survey, revised based
upon input and completed. 19
Identification of additional job groups and their associated competencies
Early in the competency development process, it became apparent that there were
additional important healthcare emergency management job groups beyond the three that
were initially described. These groups have distinct response and recovery
responsibilities (and therefore associated competencies) for the healthcare organization’s
resiliency and medical surge. After extensive research during the latest phase of the
project, the additional groups were identified as: Facilities and Engineering Services
(FES), Police and Security Services (PSS), and Clinical Support Services (CSS). Their
descriptions are presented in Table 2. Using the previously defined methodology
(including web-based peer review), the follow-on project allowed for the development of
emergency response and recovery competencies for these remaining job groups.
15 Veterans Health Administration. VHA Emergency Management Program Guidebook, 2005, accessed at:
http://www1.va.gov/emshg/page.cfm?pg=114
16 Barbera, Joseph A and Anthony G. Macintyre. Medical and Health Incident Management System: A
Comprehensive Functional Description for Mass Casualty Medical and Health Incident Management.
Institute for Crisis, Disaster & Risk Management. The George Washington University, Washington DC,
October 2002, accessed at www.gwu.edu/~icdrm/ 17 Barbera, Joseph A and Anthony G. Macintyre. Mass Casualty Handbook: Hospital Emergency
Preparedness and Response, First Edition. Jane’s Information Group, 2003. 18 CNA Corporation. Medical Surge Capacity & Capability: The Management System for Integrating
Medical and Health Resources During large-Scale Emergencies. August 2004, accessed at:
http://www.hhs.gov/ophep/mscc_handbook.html
19 Barbera JA, Macintyre AG, et al. VHA-EMA Emergency Response and Recovery Competencies:
Competency Survey, Analysis, and Report (June 16, 2005), available at www.gwu.edu/~icdrm/
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
39
Development of preparedness and mitigation (program) competencies for
Emergency Management Program Managers and Healthcare System Leaders
The methodology utilized in this project focused first on the development and validation
of response and recovery competencies as an “end state” for healthcare system personnel
in their emergency management activities. The second phase of the project allowed for
the development of program competencies for Emergency Program Managers and
Healthcare System Leaders, which focused upon preparedness and mitigation activities
necessary to reach this “end state.” These two job groups maintain primary responsibility
for the emergency management program within a healthcare system, and thus have
extensive primary competencies that relate to program development and maintenance
required for successful response to emergencies and disasters.
The program competencies were developed using the earlier methods, with identical
criteria that the competencies be objective and measurable, maintain internal and external
consistency, and be described within the context of an organization’s specific emergency
management program objectives. Program competencies may more closely align with
business management models during day-to-to day operations. Hence, organizational and
individual outputs for these groups can be expected to be more frequent. This concept
was included in the development of the program competencies.
While no formal survey was conducted following the development of these program
competencies, peer review was accomplished by providing draft competencies to experts
for comment. Only minor changes resulted.
The final job group titles and their descriptions are listed below. The competencies
follow.
Table 2. Healthcare System Job Group Definitions
All Personnel
(AP)
All personnel are defined as any healthcare system administrator,
employee, professional staff, licensed independent practitioners or
others with a specified role in the healthcare systems emergency
operations plan (EOP).
Patient Care
Providers
(PCP)
Physicians, physician assistants, registered nurses, licensed practical
nurses, nurses working within expanded roles (CRNA, RNP, and
others), emergency medical technicians, paramedics, and respiratory
therapists and others who provide direct clinical patient care. Not
included are clinical support staff that provide patient care services
under the direct supervision of patient care providers: e.g., nurse’s
aides, procedure technicians, orderlies, and others.
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
Healthcare
System Leaders
(HSL)
Hospital and/or healthcare system-wide senior executives (CEO,
COO, CFO), hospital-wide managers, department heads, nursing
executives, chief of the medical staff, and/or senior managers in
large departments or key operating units. It is assumed that
members of this job group, due to their everyday organizational
positions, would be assigned to serve in the command and general
staff positions of an ICS structure during a healthcare system’s
emergency response.
Emergency
Management
Program
Managers
(EPM)
Personnel primarily responsible for developing, implementing and
maintaining healthcare facility and system-wide emergency
management (EM) programs that include the Emergency Operations
Plan (EOP). System level emergency program managers, above the
level of individual facilities, (such as VHA Area Emergency
Managers or program managers at the level of the VA Emergency
Management Strategic Healthcare Group) are also included in this
job group. It is assumed that the individuals in this job group will
be assigned to a command & general staff ICS position (usually
planning section chief) during response, and so are expected to
possess the response and recovery competencies listed under
Healthcare System Leaders as well. In some healthcare systems, an
EM Program Manager may oversee a more limited position (e.g.
program coordinator) with a narrower range of competencies.
Clinical
Support
Services
(CSS)
Personnel that perform tasks related to the medical care of patients
without direct patient interface (e.g. pharmacists, lab technicians,
etc.) or provide patient services that aren’t primarily medical care
(social services, physical and occupational therapy, pastoral care,
patient educators, and others) or provide patient care services under
the direct supervision of patient care providers (such as nurse’s
aides, procedure technicians, orderlies, transporters).
Police &
Security
Services
(PSS)
Personnel whose day to day job in the healthcare system involves
security and the full range of law enforcement activities. Day-today duties may or may not put these individuals into direct contact
with patients.
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
40
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
Facilities and
Engineering
Services
(FES)
Personnel whose day to day job involves maintaining the physical
plant and its various systems. Included in this group are facilities
and physical plant personnel, engineers, grounds personnel,
biomedical engineers, food services, communications and IT
personnel. It also usually includes administrative safety positions
below the level of the healthcare system leaders. Day to day duties
rarely put these personnel in direct patient contact.
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
41
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
Emergency Response and Recovery Competencies
All Personnel (AP)
All personnel are defined as any healthcare system administrator, employee, professional
staff, licensed independent practitioners or others with a specified role in the healthcare
systems emergency operations plan (EOP).
x AP-R1: Utilize general Incident Command System (ICS) principles during
incident response and recovery.
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
o AP-R1.1: Describe ICS as an emergency response and recovery operating
system and its application to healthcare system incident response and
recovery, management structure, concept of operations, and planning
cycle.
o AP-R1.2: Describe your potential role(s) and responsibilities within the
healthcare system response and recovery in terms of ICS principles.
o AP-R1.3: Describe the ICS-delineated expectations of individual
responders in relation to the healthcare system response and recovery to
include: attendance at briefings, reporting requirements, and use of rolerelated documents such as Operational Checklists (Job Action Sheets).
Skills
o AP-R1.4: Demonstrate an operations level of proficiency in ICS principles
by utilizing appropriate forms, attending indicated meetings, and adhering
to appropriate reporting requirements.
x AP-R2: Recognize situations that suggest indications for full or partial
activation of the healthcare system’s Emergency Operations Plan (EOP), and
report them appropriately and promptly.
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
o AP-R2.1: Describe the general characteristics of emergency situations that
may indicate the need for full or partial EOP activation.
o AP-R2.2: Describe the reporting requirements and methodology for
situations that may require full or partial EOP activation.
Skills
o AP-R2.3: Identify situations within your areas of regular duty that should
be reported for consideration for full or partial activation of the healthcare
system’s EOP.
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
42
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
o AP-R2.4: Report situations within your areas of regular duty by following
EOP notification procedures and contacting the appropriate person as
indicated by your specific role and by the situation at hand (e.g., page
operator, supervisor, etc.).
x AP-R3: Participate in healthcare system mobilization to rapidly transition
from day-to-day operations to incident response organization and processes
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
o AP-R3.1: Describe the procedures necessary to receive notification of
EOP activation and to prepare your work area, as indicated, for EOP
response and recovery.
o AP-R3.2: Describe the initial reporting requirements for your expected
role or position.
o AP-R3.3: Describe the location and format of the system EOP.
Skills
o AP-R3.4: Follow your functional areas mobilization plan as outlined in the
EOP to prepare your work area for EOP response and recovery.
o AP-R3.5: Confirm notification receipt and report to the appropriate EOP
position your initial situation, resource status, and any special problems
encountered for your specific role or functional area.
o AP-R3.6: Locate the facility EOP and access portions applicable to your
role and responsibilities.
x AP-R4: Apply the healthcare system’s core mission statement to your actions
during emergency response and recovery.
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
o AP-R4.1: Describe how your emergency operations role and
responsibilities support the healthcare system mission during emergency
response and recovery.
Skills
o AP-R4.2: Demonstrate your understanding of the healthcare system’s
mission during emergency response and recovery by ensuring your actions
continually contribute to 1) continuity of patient care operations, 2) the
safety of patients, families, and staff, 3) the conservation of property, and
4) the healthcare system support to the community to ensure the nation’s
safety.
x AP-R5: Apply the healthcare system code of ethics to your actions during
emergency operations.
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
43
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
o AP-R5.1: Describe how the healthcare system’s and other codes of ethics
(such as Federal codes of ethics for Federal facilities), as applicable, apply
to your role and responsibilities during emergency response and recovery.
Skills
o AP-R5.2: Demonstrate your understanding of the healthcare system’s and
Federal codes (as applicable) of ethics by applying them to your individual
response actions during emergency response and recovery.
x AP-R6: Execute your personal/family preparedness plans to maximize your
availability to participate in the healthcare system’s emergency response and
recovery.
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: expert level
Knowledge
o AP-R6.1: Describe the importance of both a personal and a family
preparedness plan to allow you to perform your healthcare system
emergency response and recovery role.
o AP-R6.2: Describe your responsibility as an employee to maintain a
personal and family preparedness plan.
o AP-R6.3: Describe your responsibility as a supervisor (if applicable) to
promote employee maintenance of a personal and family preparedness
plan.
o AP-R6-4: Identify the personal/family specific requirements and details
that must be addressed in your personal/family preparedness plan that
allow you to perform your healthcare system response role in a potentially
changed work schedule and environment.
Skills
o AP-R6.5: Demonstrate your availability to work in your assigned role
during healthcare system response and recovery by executing your
personal/family preparedness plan.
o AP-R6.6: Demonstrate an expert level of proficiency in personal and
family preparedness planning by executing your personal/family
preparedness plan and meeting your personal and family needs across any
circumstances.
x AP-R7: Respond with your previously prepared and maintained personal
“go-kit” to maximize your ability to perform your assigned role during
healthcare system response and recovery.
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: expert level
Knowledge
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
44
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
o AP-R7.1: Describe the importance of your personal “go kit” for selfprotection and to allow you to perform your healthcare system response
and recovery role and responsibilities (A “go kit” contains personal
supplies that an employee would need to work their emergency response
and recovery role beyond a usual work shift, potentially not returning
home for 72 hours).
o AP-R7.2: Describe your responsibility as an employee to maintain a
personal “go-kit.”
o AP-R7.3: Describe your responsibility (if applicable) as a supervisor to
promote employee maintenance of a personal “go kit.”
o AP-R7.4: Describe how the EOP components and related policies and
procedures, (evacuation, shelter in place, lock down, etc.) of the healthcare
system Emergency Operations Plans impact your decisions on what should
be included in your personal “go kit.”
o AP-R7.5: Identify your personal situation (physical ability/constraints,
medical needs, personal/family preparedness plan, etc.) and how it impacts
on your decisions on what should be included in your personal “go kit.”
Skills
o APC-7.6: Demonstrate your availability to work in your assigned role and
operational periods during response and recovery through the use of your
personal “go kit.”
x AP-R8: Follow the general response procedures for all personnel in the
Occupant Emergency Procedures (OEP) and assist others (healthcare system
personnel, patients, and visitors) as necessary to accomplish the OEP
directives. [Footnote: More specific response procedures are addressed under
respective job groups.]
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
o AP-R8.1: Describe the component parts of the OEP and your
responsibilities and actions under each.
o AP-R8.2: Describe circumstances that could lead to OEP activation and
your responsibilities during OEP activation.
o AP-R8.3: Describe the reporting procedures for your job position that
would activate the OEP.
Skills
o AP-R8.4: Execute your roles and responsibilities for the facility OEP by
conducting the OEP directives for your job position in evacuation, shelter
in place, or other actions during emergency operations.
x AP-R9: Perform your specific roles and responsibilities as assigned in the
healthcare system’s Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) and the appropriate
Incident Action Plan (IAP) in order to support the system’s objectives.
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
45
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
o AP-R9.1: Describe the ICS framework as applied specifically to the
healthcare system emergency response and recovery.
o AP-R9.2: Describe your role and responsibility as assigned in the
healthcare system’s EOP.
o AP-R9.3: Describe how potential changes in event parameters may
necessitate changes in the facility IAP objectives and strategies, and hence
changes in your job area’s tactics and assignments (Management by
objectives).
o AE-R9.4: Describe the urgent issues that could potentially require a
change in your job or job area’s response strategies and tactics.
o AP-R9.5: Describe your personal accountability requirements during
emergency response and recovery.
o AP-R9.6: Describe the equipment and technologies for your specific role
and responsibilities within the healthcare facility EOP.
o AP-R9.7: Describe the facility policy applicable to your role for engaging
the media.
Skills
o AP-R9.8: Demonstrate appropriate EOP-designated reactive actions in
response to potential/actual events that have activated the EOP.
o AP-R9.9: Demonstrate your specific role and responsibilities as assigned
in the healthcare facility’s EOP by following your operational checklist
(job action sheet), completing assignments, filling out appropriate forms,
and fulfilling reporting requirements.
o AP-R9.10: Ensure organizational objectives are met by formulating and/or
implementing specific tactics consistent with the objectives and strategies
delineated in the controlling IAP for the current operational period.
o AP-R9.11: Report data to supervisors, as indicated, to contribute to
measuring effectiveness of your EOP functional area and its contributions
to achieving the organization’s designated incident objectives.
o AP-R9.12: Operate all equipment and technologies for your specific role
and responsibilities within the healthcare system’s EOP.
x AP-R10: Follow the Communication Plan and reporting requirements as
outlined in the healthcare system’s EOP and the specific Incident Action
Plan for an emergency event.
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
o AP-R10.1: Describe the policy and methods for communication and
reporting during emergency response and recovery.
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
46
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
o AP-R10.2: Describe the process for rapidly communicating urgent issues
that could require a change in response strategies or tactics for your job
area, and the appropriate party to receive your communication.
o AP-R10.3: Describe the process for reporting significant hazard or
response impacts that you or your job area encounter to the appropriate
party as indicated by the EOP.
o AP-R10.4: Describe the general content of the communication plan
component of the Incident Action Plan as it relates to your emergency
response and recovery role.
o AP-R10.5: Describe the procedures applicable to your role for interaction
with the media.
Skills
o AP-R10.6: Demonstrate the reporting requirements within your functional
area as delineated in the healthcare system EOP.
o AP-R10.7: Maintain communications with appropriate parties for your
role/functional area despite changing requirements and event parameters.
o AP-R10.8: Demonstrate an understanding of media interactions by
referring requests to appropriate personnel (as applicable), and when
interacting with the media, follow designated interview procedures and
protocols.
x AP-R11: Follow and enforce healthcare system’s safety rules, regulations,
and policies during emergency response and recovery.
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
o AP-R11.1: Describe the healthcare system’s safety rules, regulations, and
policies during emergency response and recovery that maintain personal
safety and a safe work environment.
o AP-R11.2: Describe how to apply the Safety Plan component of the
facility Incident Action Plan.
o AP-R11.3: Describe the safety specific actions and procedures to be
followed when unsafe situations/events are encountered.
o AP-R11.4: Describe incident parameters that may serve as stressors for
response personnel, how stress may be manifested, and appropriate
interventions for your specific role.
Skills
o AP-R11.5: Demonstrate your adherence to and enforcement of healthcare
system safety rules, regulations, and policies during emergency response
and recovery by wearing appropriate PPE, following pre-defined safety
procedures, identifying and addressing unsafe practices, and following the
IAP Safety Plan as briefed by your immediate supervisor.
o AP-R11.6: Recognize and address incident stress for yourself and others in
your functional area by identifying manifestations of stress and, in a
fashion appropriate to your specific role, decreasing the stressors, limiting
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
47
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
the negative impact of the stressors, or ensuring appropriate assistance in
recovering from negative stressors.
x AP-R12: Follow and enforce police and security measures consistent with the
nature of the incident that has prompted the EOP activation.
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
o AP-R12.1: Describe healthcare system security rules, regulations, and
policies that apply to your assigned role and responsibilities in the EOP.
o AP-R12.2: Describe the security specific actions and procedures to be
followed when a suspicious event or security breach is detected.
Skills
o AP-R12.3: Demonstrate your adherence to and enforcement of security
measures during emergency response and recovery by following security
briefings, instruction from individual security personnel, and badge
procedures.
x AP-R13: Utilize or request (as appropriate) and integrate equipment,
supplies, and personnel for your specific role or functional area during
emergency response and recovery.
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
o AP-R13.1: Describe procedures for requesting equipment, supplies, and
personnel for your functional area and the integration of these resources
during emergency response and recovery.
Skills
o AP-R13.2: Demonstrate your ability to request and integrate additional
resources by following EOP procedures outlined for these activities.
o AP-R13.3: Demonstrate the ability to assess the adequacy of equipment,
supplies and personnel to carry out your job assignments during each
operational period.
x AP-R14: Follow demobilization procedures that facilitate rapid and efficient
incident disengagement and out-processing of individual resources and/or the
overall healthcare organization.
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
o AP-R14.1: Describe demobilization policies and procedures for your work
area, including procedures to “catch up” on regular staffing and other
activities that were suspended or revised during emergency operations.
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
48
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
49
o AP-R14.2: Describe the policy and procedures for out-processing of
personnel during demobilization.
o AP-R14.3: Describe the policy and procedures for conducting an initial
Incident Review (commonly known as a “hot wash”) for your work area.
o AP-R14.4: Describe the policy and procedures for documenting and
reporting incident-related issues for inclusion in After Action Report
process, analysis, and corrective measures.
Skills
o AP-R14.5: Demonstrate demobilization procedures for the incident by
following the demobilization plan specific to your functional area.
o AP-R14.6: Prioritize, initiate or participate in delayed activities (relevant
to your position) that were suspended or revised during emergency
response.
o AP-R14.7: Participate in out-processing, to include a performance
evaluation and any indicated physical exam.
o AP-R14.8: Provide input into the Incident Review as appropriate for your
position during emergency response.
x AP-R15: Follow recovery procedures that ensure facility return to baseline
activity.
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
o AP-R15.1: Describe policies and procedures for rehabilitation of
personnel.
o AP-R15.2: Describe policies and procedures for rehabilitation of
equipment (including recertification for use), reordering of supplies
specific to your functional area, and rehabilitating your workspace.
o AP-R15.3: Describe policies and procedures specific to your role and
responsibilities for rehabilitation of the facility.
o AP-R15.4: Describe the policies and procedures for a formal After-Action
Report.
Skills
o AP-R15.5: Demonstrate an understanding of the importance of personnel
rehabilitation activities by participating in personnel rehabilitation as
instructed.
o AP-R15.6: Demonstrate an understanding of facility and equipment
rehabilitation by participating in these procedures to ensure your
functional area readiness for day-to-day activities and future EOP
activations.
o AP-R15.7: Demonstrate an understanding of After Action-Reports by
submitting items in the required format.
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
50
Emergency Management Program Manager (EPM)
Personnel primarily responsible for developing, implementing and maintaining healthcare
facility and system-wide emergency management (EM) programs that include the
Emergency Operations Plan (EOP). System level emergency program managers, above
the level of individual facilities, (such as VHA Area Emergency Managers or program
managers at the level of the VA Emergency Management Strategic Healthcare Group) are
also included in this job group. It is assumed that the individuals in this job group will
be assigned to a command & general staff ICS position (usually planning section
chief) during response, and so are expected to possess the response and recovery
competencies listed under Healthcare System Leaders as well.
20
x EPM-R1: Recognize circumstances and/or actions, across the program
manager’s jurisdiction if appropriate, that indicate a potential incident and
report the situation to facility leadership and appropriate authorities.
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: expert level
Knowledge
o EPM-R1.1: Describe the conditions across representative hazard types that
indicate a potential incident requiring healthcare system response and
recovery capabilities.
o EPM-R1.2: List the healthcare system leadership positions that should be
notified in the event of a potential incident and describe the formal
notification process.
o EPM-R1.3: List the outside authorities and resources that can be queried
to rapidly obtain information about an evolving event, and describe the
communication methods for this purpose.
Skills
o EPM-R1.4: Identify and obtain information from all non-healthcare
system sources that could indicate the occurrence of an incident and need
for healthcare system response.
o EPM-R1.5: Report the circumstances of the potential incident to the
relevant facility leader(s) and notify outside authorities as appropriate.
x EPM-R2: Provide assistance and guidance to healthcare system Incident
Managers, and other authorities as requested, on the decision to fully or
partially activate Emergency Operations Plans (EOP).
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: expert level
Knowledge
20 In some healthcare systems, an EM Program Manager may oversee a more limited position (e.g. program
coordinator) with a narrower range of competencies.
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
o EPM-R2.1: Describe the criteria that indicate the need for a partial or full
healthcare system EOP activation.
o EPM-R2.2: Describe the impact of EOP activation (full or partial) upon
day-to-day facility operations.
o EPM-R2.3: Describe the process for healthcare system EOP activation.
Skills
o EPM-R2.4: Assist facility leaders with the decision to activate emergency
medical response plans and procedures by communicating relevant
information about the nature and consequences of an incident and by
explaining the benefits of activating the EOP.
o EPM-R2.5: Provide Incident Managers with a list of all facility personnel
positions with the authority to activate the EOP, as requested, and outline
the methods for activation.
x EPM-R3: Assist in the rapid mobilization of activated healthcare systems to
transition from day-to-day activities to response and recovery operations.
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
o EPM-R3.1: Describe processes and procedures used to mobilize the
healthcare system and/or its individual facilities for emergency response
and recovery.
o EPM-R3.2: List all the external agencies relevant to your position that
should be notified of the healthcare system’s EOP activation and determine
their level of response.
o EPM-R3.3: List all the internal healthcare system resources and facilities
(ICP/EOC and others) that must be mobilized as the EOP is activated.
Skills
o EPM-R3.4: As requested by facility or healthcare system leadership, assist
in facility mobilization by ensuring appropriate external liaisons are
established and ensuring the facility management structure for response is
clearly communicated externally.
o EPM-R3.5: Provide the Healthcare System Incident Manager with
briefings on the mobilization status of healthcare system facilities and/or
internal resources (such as the EOC or the Decontamination Area) as
indicated by the type and scope of the incident activation.
x EPM-R4: Ensure full and proper execution of the appropriate emergency
operations plan (EOP) for your healthcare system or designated healthcare
system facilities during emergency response and recovery.
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: expert level
Knowledge
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
51
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
o EPM-R4.1: Describe the facility-specific as well as the larger, overarching
healthcare system incident management organizational structure and
response roles of all functional areas and key positions and how the
incident management team (IMT) functions in parallel with continued
enterprise management and operations..
o EPM-R4.2: Describe the healthcare enterprise’s organizational
requirements as well as the relevant laws, regulations, policies and
precedents that affect emergency operations and principles of emergency
management.
Skills
o EPM-R4.3: Provide the healthcare system Incident Command Post with an
initial projection of the supplies and resources needed for response and
recovery as requested and as appropriate.
o EPM-R4.4: At the outset of the incident, provide a briefing to the
healthcare system incident manager on the response actions undertaken by
external incident response agencies, or assure this is accomplished by the
healthcare system senior liaison.
o EPM-R4.5: Verify that the healthcare system’s personnel have adopted
incident management roles and responsibilities according to the response
structure and functional roles delineated in the relevant EOPs.
o EPM-R4.6: Verify compliance of EOP response actions with applicable
rules and regulations, and advise the facility Incident Commander as
indicated.
o EPM-R4.7: Provide assistance by monitoring the emergency response
system assessing the adequacy and effectiveness of the incident
management system in place at activated facilities within the healthcare
system, as appropriate for the Program Manager’s jurisdiction.
o EPM-R4.8: Address any apparent deficiencies noted in the incident
management system during response and recovery by notifying the
Incident Commander of the facility within the healthcare system and
recommending solutions.
x EPM-R5: Demonstrate the ability to function as a healthcare system’s Plans
Chief within the ICS structure as indicated by the Emergency Operations
Plan (EOP).
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: expert level
Knowledge
o EPM-R5.1: Describe the healthcare system response roles and
responsibilities ascribed to the chief of the Planning Section in the EOP.
o EPM-R5.2: Describe the facility Incident Planning Cycle and the key
components for which the Plans Chief is responsible.
o EPM-R5.3: Describe the methods for functional area reporting and for the
collation, processing, and dissemination of this information.
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
52
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
o EPM-R5.4: Describe methods for monitoring response and recovery
actions in order to assist the Incident Commander in determining progress
towards achieving the incident objectives.
Skills
o EPM-R5.5: Establish an effective Incident Planning Cycle by defining
operational periods (approved by the system Incident Commander),
coordinating the Planning Cycle timing with non-healthcare system
response agencies, and disseminating the schedule for essential planning
activities (management and planning meetings, operational briefings, and
others).
o EPM-R5.6: Ensure adequate functional area reporting by establishing the
time schedule for reporting and verifying reports are received, to include
situation, resource status, specific tactics utilized, progress accomplished,
and unusual problems encountered; include patient tracking as necessary.
o EPM-R5.7: Include information originating internal and external to the
system in the planning process by monitoring internal and external sources
for information, including the level of response by external organizations,
and considering the information in the planning process.
o EPM-R5.8: Ensure awareness of event parameters within the healthcare
system by providing continual updates to the leader of functional areas and
external agencies as appropriate.
o EPM-R5.9: Provide rapid contingency response by monitoring for sudden
changes in event parameters that necessitate revision of response strategies
and tactics, and disseminate appropriate notification to relevant internal
and external parties.
o EPM-R5.10: Manage orderly and concise planning activities (management
and planning meetings, operational briefings) by limiting distractions,
providing agendas, and ensuring documentation of all relevant information
discussed in the meetings.
x EPM-R6: Perform or assist with the senior healthcare system liaison function
and ensure that relevant response and recovery information is exchanged
with senior healthcare system management levels beyond the immediate
agency executive, if indicated.
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
o EPM-R6.1: Describe the purpose and structure of the enterprise’s
overarching healthcare system administrative hierarchy (such as the
Veterans Integrated Service Network and Headquarters for the VHA) and
its potential role during facility emergency response and recovery.
o EPM-R6.2: Describe essential components of facility planning that should
be disseminated to senior healthcare system management levels.
o EPM-R6.3: Describe any assigned healthcare enterprise responsibilities to
the community, State, or Federal governments or other entities established
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
53
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
through contracts, statutes or other authorities (for example, the VHADoD Contingency Plan) where the healthcare organization should
establish a formal liaison function.
Skills
o EPM-R6.4: If part of a larger healthcare system (such as a VA Medical
Center within a Veterans Integrated Service Network (VISN)), fulfill the
region-wide emergency operations (response) plan and liaison function if
it is activated.
o EPM-R6.5: Ensure that senior healthcare system officials are receiving
accurate information from the facility (usually through the facility’s
agency executive) by providing the current facility IAP and/or situation
reports in formats that are understandable to them.
o EPM-R6.6: Ensure that the facility Agency Executive and Incident
Manager receive appropriate communications from senior healthcare
system officials above the level of the incident management structure.
o EPM-R6.7: Assure that established responsibilities to the community,
State, or Federal governments or other entities addressed and required
actions communicated to appropriate Agency Executives and Incident
Management Teams.
x EPM-R7: If Program Manager of a larger healthcare system (such as a VA
Medical Center within a Veterans Integrated Service Network (VISN)) with
activated IMTs within individual healthcare facilities within your network,
establish senior liaison with appropriate external healthcare organizations
within the healthcare system in your area, conduct information exchange,
and coordinate incident response strategies and tactics.
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
o EPM-R7.1: List relevant external healthcare organizations that exist within
the emergency response network in your area and methods for contacting
them.
o EPM-R7.2: Describe how the emergency response and recovery actions of
healthcare facilities within your network and in your area impact one
another.
o EPM-R7.3: Describe how healthcare facilities within your network and
external agencies in the same impact area may support one another during
emergency response and recovery.
Skills
o EPM-R7.4: Ensure the IMT contact information for activated IMTs in
your network is disseminated to appropriate external emergency response
agencies.
o EPM-R7.5: Facilitate the process for healthcare facilities within your
network to gain access to appropriate external emergency response
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
54
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
agencies by establishing liaison or providing contact methods (as
indicated).
o EPM-R7.6: Facilitate coordination of response strategies and tactics by
ensuring regular exchange of Incident Action Plans (or summaries
contained in Situation Reports) between IMTs in your network and the
appropriate external emergency response agencies.
EPM-R7.7: Facilitate the use of mutual aid agreements between facilities
within your network, and with external organizations when indicated.
x EPM-R8: Participate in demobilization processes within the activated
healthcare organization (such as a VHA Medical Center and/or within its
overarching Veterans Integrated Service Network) to disengage resources
from incident response and allow return to normal operations or back to
stand-by status.
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
o EPM-R8.1: Describe both the general objectives of the demobilization
process and the specific management issues associated with
demobilization, rehabilitation of response elements, and preparation to
return to routine professional roles.
Skills
o EPM-R8.2: Assist in the demobilization of the healthcare organization and
its resources by verifying that operational objectives have been met (or are
reassigned to continuing units) and that appropriate internal and external
notification is made regarding demobilization.
o EPM-R8.3: Participate in any initial incident review (commonly known as
a “hot wash”) and assist organizational leadership with ensuring
appropriate procedures are followed for maintaining/preserving
information for the After Action Report process.
o EPM-R8.4: Assist with the debriefing and performance assessments of
response personnel under your supervision, and others as requested by the
organization’s incident manager.
x EPM-R9: Assist, as indicated by assigned position in recovery management,
with healthcare organization recovery to full pre-incident function, including
return to routine facility management and medical care activities.
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
o EPM-R9.1: Describe the incident planning and management processes for
transitioning from response to recovery.
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
55
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
56
o EPM-R9.2: Describe the procedures and priorities for returning response
resources and the overall organization to pre-incident operations and
management.
o EPM-R9.3: Describe the process required to re-evaluate the healthcare
organization’s patient population and post-incident patient care activities,
which includes addressing the backlog of regular work.
Skills
o EPM-R9.4: Assist, as requested, with personnel rehabilitation by
providing advice on procedures for addressing physical or psychological
concerns.
o EPM-R9.5: Assist, as requested, with facility and equipment rehabilitation
by establishing priority of recovery activities and identifying additional
resources that may be required.
o EPM-R9.6: Assist, as requested, with addressing backlogs of regular work
by providing advice to facility leaders on surge capacity methods and the
prioritization of backlogged services.
x EPM-R10: Fulfill emergency management program requirements for a
formal incident After-Action Report (AAR) process that captures and
processes recommended changes to achieve organizational learning.
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: expert level
Knowledge
o EPM-R10.1: Describe the policies and procedures as well as other
considerations for completing the formal After Action Report on
healthcare system response.
o EPM-R10.2: Describe procedures for capturing information, analysis and
acceptance or recommendations, and implementation of changes to a
healthcare system EOP and overarching emergency management program.
Skills
o EPM-R10.3: Conduct efficient After Action Reports by utilizing incident
response procedures for conducting a meeting and by ensuring After
Action Report items are documented in the required format (i.e., issue,
background, recommended action, responsible party and recommended
timeframe).
o EPM-R10.4: Ensure organizational learning by conducting appropriate
analysis of recommendations, obtaining formal administration approval of
accepted recommendations, and incorporating the recommended changes
into the healthcare system EOP and other components of the emergency
management program.
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
Healthcare System Leaders (HSL)
Hospital and/or healthcare system-wide senior executives (CEO, COO, CFO), hospitalwide managers, department heads, nursing executives, chief of the medical staff, and/or
senior managers in large departments or key operating units. It is assumed that members
of this job group, due to their everyday organizational positions, would be assigned to
serve in the command and general staff positions of an ICS structure during a healthcare
system’s emergency response.
x HSL-R1: Identify specific criteria of potential events that require the full or
partial activation of the system’s Emergency Operations Plan (EOP).
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: expert level
Knowledge
o HSL-R1.1: Describe the specific characteristics of potential events that
would require EOP full or partial activation.
o HSL-R1.2: Describe the impact of EOP activation (full or partial) upon
day-to-day facility operations.
o HSL-R1.3: Describe potential sources of information that may assist with
incident recognition.
Skills
o HSL-R1.4: Demonstrate understanding of criteria for EOP full or partial
activation by initiating appropriate levels of EOP activation rapidly during
specific events.
o HSL-R1.5: Ensure appropriate decisions are made about EOP activation
by considering the impact of EOP activation (full or partial) upon day-today facility operations including the provision of essential services to
existing patient populations.
o HSL-R1.6: Ensure appropriate information is included in the decision to
activate the EOP (as necessary) by coordinating with facility personnel
who have relevant information or who have expertise relevant to the
incident type.
o HSL-R1.7: Ensure appropriate information from external sources is
considered in the decision to activate the EOP by coordinating with
external agencies that may provide incident-related information.
x HSL-R2: Activate or support activation of the Emergency Operations Plan
(EOP) to manage emergency response.
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
o HSL-R2.1: Describe the EOP activation and notification process.
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
57
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
o HSL-R2.2: List the types of notification for the facility and specific
functional areas.
o HSL-R2.3: List relevant external agencies that should be notified of the
system’s EOP activation (full or partial); e.g. VHA/VISN administrators,
local public health, local public safety, etc.
o HSL-R2.4: Describe the initial reporting process from the notified
functional areas in order to determine receipt of the notification message
and initial resource availability.
Skills
o HSL-R2.5: Ensure appropriate EOP activation by identifying personnel
with authority to activate the EOP and using the established methods for
activation.
o HSL-R2.6: Ensure awareness of EOP activation by determining and
conducting the appropriate level of notification (update, alert, advisory,
activation) for the system, specific functional areas, and external agencies
as applicable.
o HSL-R2.7: Confirm the activation of functional areas (management,
operations, logistics, plans/information, finance/administration) by
receiving and processing confirmation of notifications.
x HSL-R3: Ensure rapid system mobilization that transitions response
personnel and resources from day-to-day activities to their designated
incident response status.
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
o HSL-R3.1: Describe the management positions responsible for assuring
mobilization of all key resources and personnel in the healthcare system’s
EOP, and the reporting process for determining mobilization status.
o HSL-R3.2: Describe the layout, location of supplies, and set-up of the
facility Incident Command Post (ICP) or alternatively (according to the
organization’s EOP), the healthcare facility’s Emergency Operations
Center (EOC) with a smaller ICP at the site of primary response activity.
Skills
o HSL-R3.3: Confirm the mobilization of functional areas (management,
operations, logistics, plans/information, finance/administration) by
receiving and processing confirmation of mobilization and full readiness
for response.
o HSL-R3.4: Ensure adequate resources and facilities are available for the
healthcare system including assisting with or supervising (as indicated by
leader position) establishment of the Emergency Operations Center (EOC)
and Incident Command Post (ICP) for the organization.
o HSL-R3.5: Review the mobilized command and general staff area of the
ICP or EOC to confirm that those positions can fully operate in their
positions.
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
58
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
x HSL-R4: Ensure appropriate execution of the healthcare system Occupant
Emergency Procedures (OEP) by assuring appropriate protective actions for
patients, staff and visitors, and for the integrity of the healthcare system.
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
o HSL-R4.1: Describe the decision process for activating the OEP and how
the OEP functions within the Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) for the
organization.
o HSL-R4.2: Describe the accountability processes for staff, patients,
visitors, vital records, and critical equipment and how the overall and final
accountability is confirmed.
o HSL-R4.3: List critical external resources required to support OEP
activation.
Skills
o HSL-R4.4: Make decisions during OEP implementation that reflect the
prioritized system objectives of life safety, incident stabilization, and
protection of mission critical property and operating systems.
o HSL-R4.5: Demonstrate oversight of accountability for staff, patients,
visitors and mission critical systems.
x HSL-R5: Ensure that the system’s incident management is effective, utilizes
Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) procedures and processes, and uses a
pro-active ‘management by objective’ approach.
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: expert level
Knowledge
o HSL-R5.1: Describe the functional organization of the healthcare system’s
incident management during emergency response and recovery and how
the activated incident management team (IMT) interacts through the
agency executive with the enterprise’s ongoing management and operating
systems.
o HSL-R5.2: Describe the initial reactive phase of the healthcare system’s
incident response and the important transition to pro-active ‘management
by objectives.’
o HSL-R5.3: Describe the healthcare system’s code of ethics and how it is
considered/applied during incident planning and management decisionmaking procedures during emergency response and recovery.
Skills
o HSL-R5.4: Ensure the healthcare system’s incident management structure
is well delineated by formally assigning facility incident management
positions and providing the organizational structure with assignments
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
59
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
(System ICS diagram) to relevant parties both internal and external to the
system.
o HSL-R5.5: Provide pro-active incident management by developing,
analyzing, and revising, as necessary, facility response objectives during
management meetings in the Planning Cycle (management by objectives).
o HSL-R5.6: Ensure that healthcare system response objectives are
efficiently and adequately met by performing continual monitoring of the
system’s incident response system and outcomes.
o HSL-R5.7: Ensure the healthcare system’s code of ethics is applied, as
appropriate, by considering it during response planning and decisionmaking.
o HSL-R5.8: Address limitations of the healthcare system’s EOP capacity
and capability by identifying limitations and developing responseappropriate options to address unmet needs.
x HSL-R6: Manage continuous incident action planning through iterative
planning cycle procedures that provide strategic and general tactical
guidance to healthcare system personnel in order to achieve surge capacity,
surge capability, and organizational resiliency.
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: expert level
Knowledge
o HSL-R6.1: Describe the purpose of management meetings, planning
meetings, and operations briefings for emergency response and recovery.
o HSL-R6.2: Describe the key components of the healthcare system’s
response Incident Action Plan and methods of dissemination, both
internally and externally.
o HSL-R6.3: Describe the purpose and the components of long term,
alternative, contingency, and demobilization planning.
Skills
o HSL-R6.4: Ensure the clear delineation of the healthcare system’s
operations cycle by establishing and disseminating the timing of planning
meetings and operational periods.
o HSL-R6.5: Ensure facility objectives are met by supervising the
development, analysis, and revision of facility response strategies and
general tactics.
o HSL-R6.6: Ensure healthcare system personnel safety by identifying,
minimizing, or preventing threats/hazards, and by responding to all real or
potential safety issues for healthcare system response (Safety Plan)
throughout the emergency response and recovery.
o HSL-R6.7: Ensure efficient incident planning, as indicated by your
incident management position, by participating in or conducting structured
planning and management meetings, and operations briefings.
o HSL-R6.8: Ensure appropriate dissemination of incident planning
decisions by documenting and disseminating the healthcare system’s
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
60
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
Incident Action Plans to relevant persons internal and external to the
facility.
o HSL-R6.9: Demonstrate comprehensive incident planning by performing
or assigning analysis of long term, alternative, contingency, and
demobilization plans during response and recovery.
o HSL-R6.10: Manage efficient exchange of information by participating in
shift change briefings.
x HSL-R7: Manage efficient information processing regarding response
activities
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
o HSL-R7.1: Describe the components and timing of functional area
reporting and how the results can be processed and analyzed to identify
progress or problems in meeting the facility’s incident objectives.
o HSL-R7.2: Describe critical sources of incident information external to the
healthcare system.
o HSL-R7.3: Describe procedures for reporting back to functional areas,
including dissemination of the healthcare system’s Incident Action Plan.
o HSL-R7.4: Describe types of event parameters that would require sudden
changes in response strategies or tactics.
Skills
o HSL-R7.5: Ensure adequate functional area reporting by establishing the
timing of the reporting and verifying that reports include a situation
description, resource status, specific tactics utilized, progress
accomplished, and unusual problems encountered (include patient tracking
as necessary).
o HSL-R7.6: Include information originating external to the healthcare
system in the planning process by monitoring external sources for
information (including the level of response by external organizations) and
considering them in the planning process.
o HSL-R7.7: Ensure awareness of event parameters within the healthcare
system by providing continual updates to the leaders of functional areas
and to external agencies as appropriate.
o HSL-R7.8: Provide early response to contingencies by monitoring sudden
changes in event parameters that necessitate immediate revision of
response strategies and tactics and by disseminating appropriate
notification to relevant parties (internal and external).
x HSL-R8: Provide information on the facility’s emergency response and
recovery activities to patients, patients’ families, facility personnel’s families,
the media, and the general public, as appropriate.
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
61
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
Knowledge
o HSL-R8.1: Describe the methods of delivering information to the media
and the important components of the message.
o HSL-R8.2: Describe procedures used to ensure patients, patients’ families,
and facility personnel’s families are kept apprised of response operations.
o HSL-R8.3: Describe coordination techniques that ensure the facility’s
media message is consistent with other organizations’ messages to the
public.
o HSL-R8.4: Describe HIPAA and its application to emergency response
and recovery as well as other patient confidentiality measures.
Skills
o HSL-R8.5: Ensure the continuous update of relevant parties by providing,
or assigning the task of providing, incident updates and the timing of
subsequent update reports.
o HSL-R8.6: Ensure media messages are appropriate and consistent with
that of other organizations by coordinating with the external community
incident managers and public information personnel.
o HSL-R8.7: Identify public perceptions of the facility’s response and false
information relating to the facility’s response by performing monitoring of
media reports (address falsehoods as indicated).
o HSL-R8.8: Ensure confidentiality of patient information by monitoring
response and recovery actions for adherence to these standards where
applicable.
x HSL-R9: Monitor the response and recovery needs of the facility’s functional
areas, and, if needed, provide support with additional facilities, equipment,
communications, personnel or other assistance.
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
o HSL-R9.1: Describe resource-tracking processes for the facility.
o HSL-R9.2: Describe the resource request processes for functional areas in
the facility to request both internal and external resources.
o HSL-R9.3: List the critical elements of a Communications Plan.
o HSL-R9.4: List potential sources of technical assistance.
o HSL-R9.5: Describe procedures for ensuring the health and well-being of
facility personnel.
o HSL-R9.6: Describe integration methods of outside donated resources
(personnel, equipment, supplies).
Skills
o HSL-R9.7: Demonstrate the ability to anticipate functional area requests
by conducting an adequate incident planning process.
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
62
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
o HSL-R9.8: Provide logistical support to functional areas, first by
identifying functional area needs and then appropriate resources to meet
those needs.
o HSL-R9.9: Provide communication support to functional areas by
assisting with the development and approval of the facility
Communications Plan, which should document and disseminate contact
methods for relevant parties internal and external to the facility.
o HSL-R9.10: Provide technical assistance to functional areas, as indicated,
by identifying outside subject matter experts or other appropriate
information resources.
o HSL-R9.11: Ensure the health and well-being of facility personnel by
participating in/approving the Medical Plan for the IAP (as indicated by
your management position).
o HSL-R9.12: Assist with the integration of external assistance and supplies,
solicited and unsolicited, by managing them until they are assigned to
specific functional areas.
x HSL-R10: Establish appropriate measures to document, track, or reimburse
financial costs associated with facility response and recovery.
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
o HSL-R10.1: Describe processes for tracking personnel and resources
utilized during response.
o HSL-R10.2: Describe processes for compensating personnel utilized
during response and for claims made by these personnel.
o HSL-R10.3: Describe processes for reimbursement of external assistance
provided during response.
o HSL-R10.4: Describe processes for tracking other costs of response (e.g.
delayed elective procedures, equipment and supplies consumed, etc).
Skills
o HSL-R10.5: Provide for personnel compensation by maintaining lists of
personnel utilized during response and time worked.
o HSL-R10.6: Provide for incident expense claims by ensuring appropriate
documentation is completed and submitted within the required time
periods.
o HSL-R10.7: Provide for equipment and supply reimbursement by tracking
lists of supplies and equipment utilized during response and recovery.
o HSL-R10.8: Provide for compensation of external assistance (contract or
cooperative assistance) by tracking utilization of these resources and
ensuring prompt payment as indicated.
o HSL-R10.9: Provide a summary of response and recovery impact on
facility finances by documenting and analyzing the direct and indirect
costs of EOP activation, including lost revenue.
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
63
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
x HSL-R11: Manage facility response so that it adheres to appropriate
regulations and standards or seek relief as required.
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
o HSL-R11.1: Describe permissible emergency response and recovery
deviations from the normal standard of medical care provided under
normal facility conditions, and the processes for seeking temporary
suspension or relaxation of regulations during emergencies.
o HSL-R11.2: Describe, in general, the applicable public health laws and
their impact on the facility’s emergency response and recovery.
o HSL-R11.3: Describe the process for verifying the credentials of
healthcare and other professionals, from resources external to the facility,
who offer assistance to the healthcare facility.
o HSL-R11.4: Describe potential liability exposures that could occur for the
facility and its patient care staff during emergency response and recovery.
Skills
o HSL-R11.5: Address appropriate healthcare regulatory issues during
response and recovery by monitoring response activities for regulatory
compliance and correcting deviations or appropriately justifying and
explaining them.
o HSL-R11.6: Request and obtain appropriate regulatory relief by contacting
appropriate authorities and providing explanations of, and justifications
for, the requests.
o HSL-R11.7: Ensure appropriate credentialing and privileging of response
personnel (from internal or external sources) to perform healthcare tasks,
within the facility’s operations, by monitoring personnel activities for
conformance to their specific expertise.
o HSL-R11.8: Provide facility and personnel liability protection by
documenting incident details surrounding occurrences with potential legal
liability.
x HSL-R12: Ensure that the Business Continuity Program considerations are
incorporated into the facility’s Incident Action Planning (IAP) process.
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
o HSL-R12.1: Describe the purpose and importance of a Business
Continuity Program that is fully integrated into the facility EOP.
o HSL-R12.2: Describe the elements and supporting functions of a Business
Continuity Program as outlined in the NFPA 1600 Standard on
Disaster/Emergency Management and Business Continuity Programs,
2004 Edition.
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
64
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
o HSL-R12.3: Describe how the Business Continuity Program aligns with
overall Incident Command System (ICS) organization and procedures.
Skills
o HSL-R12.4: Include business continuity specific objectives in the Incident
Action Planning process in order to address the recovery, resumption, and
restoration of facility-specific services.
o HSL-R12.5: Use (as appropriate) the Business Continuity support annex
forms and guidance during emergency response and recovery.
x HSL-R13: Assure that incident-specific safety guidance, in the form of an
Incident Safety Plan and/or IAP safety message, is developed by the Safety
Officer position through action planning and appropriately disseminated to
responders.
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
o HSL-R13.1: Describe the importance of empowering the safety office
position to stop or alter incident operations that present immediate safety
risks to responders, staff, patients, visitors or the integrity of the healthcare
system.
Skills
o HSL-R13.2: Provide technical advice and other input into the safety plan
and safety message development as indicated by technical background and
the assigned position in Command and General Staff of the Incident
Management Team (IMT).
x HSL-R14: Ensure rapid and effective demobilization of the healthcare
organization’s response resources, and eventually the emergency response
itself, as the organization transitions to recovery operations.
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
o HSL-R14.1: Describe the management of demobilization and the
important processes that must occur during the demobilization process.
o HSL-R14.2: Describe methods used to formally announce full or partial
demobilization.
o HSL-R14.3: Describe procedures for out-processing of personnel.
o HSL-R14.4: Describe the procedures for conducting an initial incident
review.
Skills
o HSL-R14.5: Guide the orderly demobilization of functional areas by
ensuring that demobilization occurs as soon as the facility and/or resources
are no longer needed for response (i.e. their specific response objectives
have been met or otherwise resolved).
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
65
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
66
o HSL-R14.6: Provide clear explanation and notification of demobilization
to relevant parties (internal and external), usually by demonstrating that
response objectives have been met.
o HSL-R14.7: Provide adequate out-processing of response personnel by
ensuring adequate debriefings and assessments of performance as
appropriate.
o HSL-R14.8: Provide for an orderly initial incident review process
(commonly known as a “hot wash”) by utilizing response procedures to
conduct the meeting.
x HSL-R15: Ensure recovery is accomplished to restore the healthcare
organization to baseline operations and to capture important lessons for
organizational improvement.
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
o HSL-R15.1: Describe the overall process for managing the return of the
organization to baseline operations and all activities to regular
management oversight, including addressing the backlog of regular
workload that accumulated during emergency operations.
o HSL-R15.2: List critical equipment, priorities for rehabilitation, and the
methods for re-certifying the equipment for future use.
o HSL-R15.3: Describe the process for facility re-certification (if
applicable).
o HSL-R15.4: Describe the personnel rehabilitation process.
o HSL-R15.5: Describe the After-Action Report process and methods
utilized to keep the process orderly and constructive.
Skills
o HSL-R15.6: Manage the initial recovery operations by employing the
same incident management structure and processes as used for the
emergency response phase, with new objectives, personnel, and
departmental assignments as needed; transition the management of
residual recovery operations to everyday administrative functions as
recovery management is terminated.
o HSL-R15.7: Manage rehabilitation and re-certification for use of
equipment and incident facilities by prioritizing areas for initial attention.
o HSL-R15.8: Provide for personnel rehabilitation by disseminating the
methods for response personnel to address psychological and/or physical
concerns.
o HSL-R15.9: Oversee the After-Action Report process by using facility
procedures and processes that capture response deficiencies and best
practices, and that incorporate accepted changes as EOP and emergency
management program revisions (i.e., organizational learning).
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
Patient Care Provider (PCP)
Physicians, physician assistants, registered nurses, licensed practical nurses, nurses
working within expanded roles (CRNA, RNP, and others), emergency medical
technicians, paramedics, and respiratory therapists and others who provide direct clinical
patient care. Not included are clinical support staff that provide patient care services
under the direct supervision of patient care providers: e.g., nurse’s aides, procedure
technicians, orderlies, and others.
x PCP-R1: Recognize situations related to patient care that indicate the need
for full or partial activation of the healthcare system’s Emergency
Operations Plan (EOP), and report them appropriately and promptly.
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
o PCP-R1.1: Describe patient presentation criteria (unusual signs and
symptoms indicative of deliberate illness/injury, indications of potentially
epidemic illness/injury, unexpected rapid patient deterioration, difficult
patient interventions such as decontamination, etc.) that indicate the
possible need for EOP activation.
o PCP-R1.2: Describe patient population profiles and other situation-based
criteria (unusual numbers, very unusual contagiousness and other
indications of increased risk to response personnel or current patients, etc.)
that indicate the possible need for EOP activation.
o PCP-R1.3 Describe resources available to Patient Care Providers in
obtaining additional patient or situational information related to
determining the need for activating the EOP.
o PCP-R1.4: Describe the reporting requirements and the contact methods
when events are recognized that may indicate the need for possible EOP
activation (full or partial).
Skills
o PCP-R1.5: Identify situations within the regular clinical care area that
should be reported for consideration of full or partial activation of the
healthcare facility’s EOP.
o PCP-R1.6: Report situations within the regular clinical care area by
following EOP notification procedures and contacting the appropriate
person (e.g., page operator, supervisor, etc.) as indicated by your specific
role and by the situation at hand.
o PCP-R1.7: Assist decision-makers with incident recognition by
responding rapidly and adequately to their inquiries and requests for
additional pertinent clinical and patient population information.
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
67
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
x PCP-R2: Participate in the mobilization of the your clinical area to transition
from day-to day operations to the incident response organization and
process.
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
o PCP-R2.1: Describe the procedures necessary to prepare your clinical
area, as indicated, for EOP response and recovery.
Skills
o PCP-R2.2: Ensure maximum patient surge capacity and capability and
organizational resiliency by assisting in the mobilization of your clinical
care area as described in the EOP.
o PCP-R2.3: Establish and implement triage criteria based on actual and
anticipated patient needs, disease parameters, and anticipated resources.
o PCP-R2.4: Establish a decontamination area and other functions that are
inactive during baseline operations, as indicated and per your individual
assignment.
o PCP-R2.5: Provide surge bed capacity for incident victims by
accomplishing rapid disposition of existing patients in the emergency
department, outpatient procedures area, and inpatient units as indicated by
the EOP.
o PCP-R2.6: Conduct actions as described in the EOP that are indicated for
the specific incident parameters, including resource management and
situation reporting.
o PCP-R2.7: Ensure that external notifications (as relevant to your position)
are coordinated through command and general staff
x PCP-R3: Follow the healthcare Occupant Emergency Procedures (OEP) for
your specific clinical care areas by assuring protective actions for patients
and staff and by assisting others as necessary to accomplish the OEP
directives.
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
o PCP-R3.1: Describe the component parts of the OEP and your
responsibilities to protect patients and, as indicated by your position,
maintain accountability for patients, patient care information (charts, etc.)
and clinical staff.
o PCP-R3.2: Describe the methods to be used to maintain patient care
during OEP activity, including during shelter-in-place, evacuation, or
emergency events in the clinical unit.
Skills
o PCP-R3.3: Execute your roles and responsibilities in the facility OEP for
protecting patients, patient information and others (as indicated) by
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
68
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
assisting with evacuating patients, establishing shelter-in-place, or other
actions during OEP operations.
o PCP-R3.4: Ensure continuous patient care by prioritizing and performing
essential clinical interventions during OEP operations.
x PCP-R4: Provide Surge Capacity by managing/treating increased numbers
of patients (compared with day-to-day activities), regardless of etiology.
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
o PCP-R4.1: Describe strategies and tactics appropriate to your clinical area
that provide surge capacity for a significantly increased number of
patients.
o PCP-R4.2: Describe the triage processes necessary to match need with
available resources in your clinical area.
Skills
o PCP-R4.3: Provide patient surge capacity by instituting and adhering to
the EOP measures designated for your clinical area.
o PCP-R4.4: Maximize the ability of patients to help themselves (when
appropriate) by providing clear instructions and by enhancing their ability
to help themselves (e.g., by controlling pain or other interventions).
o PCP-R4.6: Manage or participate in degradation of overall services by
prioritizing critical tasks and activities over less critical ones.
o PCP-R4.7: Perform ongoing triage (matching resources to needs) to
manage patient load by assigning priorities for services including
diagnostic testing, pharmaceutical administration, operative intervention,
blood infusion, and others.
o PCP-R4.8: Provide continuous input into management decision-making by
projecting resource needs for your clinical area as appropriate.
x PCP-R5: Provide Surge Capability by managing/treating all incoming
patients with specialty needs that vary significantly from day-to-day
healthcare system activities.
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
o PCP-R5.1: Describe special etiologies that may tax the facility response,
even with limited numbers of patients.
o PCP-R5.2: Describe the pathophysiology of injuries and illnesses
associated with mass casualties and the indicated interventions for your
clinical discipline.
o PCP-R5.3: Describe threats or hazards posed by these types of patients.
o PCP-R5.4: Describe methods for hazard/threat containment for these types
of patients (as applicable).
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
69
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
o PCP-R5.5: List resources where technical information may be found that
may assist with caring for patients with these needs.
Skills
o PCP-R5.6: Demonstrate understanding of injury and illness associated
with these specialty-needs patients by providing the appropriate
interventions to minimize further injury/illness and to maximize patient
recovery.
o PCP-R5.7: Provide evidence-based care for these patients by accessing
technical expertise as appropriate.
o PCP-R5.8: Perform special situation procedures per the EOP annexes and
as indicated by event circumstances (e.g., decontamination, isolation, etc.)
o PCP-R5.9: Contain hazards/threats posed by patients (as applicable) by
removing the hazards from the patients, the use of PPE, appropriately
locating patients or other measures.
o PCP-R5.10: Adhere to appropriate chain custody procedures as applicable
to the particular situation at hand.
x PCP-R6: Provide for efficient information processing for your clinical area
through both reporting and receiving information according to established
time schedules.
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
o PCP-R6.1: Describe the types of relevant information that are required for
reporting from your clinical area.
o PCP-R6.2: Describe the format and timing of reporting information from
your clinical area.
o PCP-R6.3: Describe the methods in which your clinical area should
receive incident information during emergency response and recovery.
Skills
o PCP-R6.4: Provide input into the healthcare system’s incident planning
through updates (as requested) on situation (patient care, continued or
recovered function of patient care systems, etc.), resources
(pharmaceuticals, equipment and medical supplies, etc.), special problems
encountered, and tasks completed in your clinical area.
o PCP-R6.5: Ensure tracking of incident patients by providing updates (as
requested) on numbers, types, and locations of patients as well as
interventions required.
o PCP-R6.6: Ensure appropriate designations are used for patient tracking
(‘meets case definition for incident’, ‘suspicious for case definition,’ etc.)
as applicable.
o PCP-R6.7: Provide prompt notification when patient care activities reveal
information that dictates major or sudden changes in response strategies.
o PCP-R6.8: Deliver or participate in briefings conducted for your clinical
area.
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
70
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
x PCP-R7: Manage the psychological impact on victims, victims’ families, and
staff through both preventative and therapeutic measures.
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
o PCP-R7.1: Describe the potential psychological effects on incident victims
and their families and the indicated interventions for your clinical
discipline.
o PCP-R7.2: List the potential psychological effects on responding
personnel and the indicated interventions for your work area.
o PCP-R7.3: Describe preventative methods that may lessen the
psychological impact on victims, victims’ families, and staff.
Skills
o PCP-R7.4: Provide psychological and emotional support to patients and
their families as indicated by your clinical discipline.
o PCP-R7.5: Provide information on the event, its etiology, and facility
interventions to patients and family members in your clinical area (written
if possible).
o PCP-R7.6: Provide frequent updates on expected interventions for
individual victims to the family members in your clinical area.
o PCP-R7.7: Assist with the identification of specific stressors for staff in
your work area and report them to your supervisor.
o PCP-R7.8: Assist with assigned measures designed to reduce staff stress
during response and recovery (e.g. facilitating information dissemination
amongst staff).
x PCP-R8: Incorporate relevant safety practices and procedures in all incident
operations for your clinical area.
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
o PCP-R8.1: Describe categories of hazards that may pose a risk to clinical
staff during emergency response and recovery.
o PCP-R8.2: Describe interventions for clinical staff and others to reduce the
potential risk created by incident parameters.
Skills
o PCP-R8.3: Participate in or conduct safety briefings (based upon the
incident Safety Plan) during each work cycle.
o PCP-R8.4: Adhere to universal precautions and infection control
procedures (whether day-to-day or specific to the incident) as indicated.
o PCP-R8.5: Adhere to appropriate work cycles for your clinical area.
o PCP-R8.6: Select and use appropriate PPE when applicable.
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
71
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
o PCP-R8.7: Provide for safe use of PPE by monitoring those individuals
utilizing PPE.
o PCP-R8.8: Minimize security-safety risk to clinical personnel by
coordinating with facility security personnel.
x PCP-R9: Integrate outside resources into your clinical area as required to
meet response objectives.
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
o PCP-R9.1: Describe procedures for requesting, receiving, briefing,
assigning and supervising clinical personnel from other clinical units or
from other facilities.
o PCP-R9.2: Describe procedures for requesting, receiving, rapid inservicing and using equipment and supplies (especially items that aren’t
normally used in your clinical area).
Skills
o PCP-R9.3: Initiate requests for outside resources by delineating specific
needs in the required format.
o PCP-R9.4: Assist in the integration of personnel from outside your work
area by ensuring they participate in briefings on operations in your area
and monitoring their response actions
o PCP-R9.5: Integrate equipment and supplies from outside your clinical
area by ensuring familiarity with their use and by tracking their use.
o PCP-R9.6: Provide appropriate utilization of technical expertise by
assessing the source and incorporating applicable recommendations.
x PCP-R10: Follow recovery procedures for your clinical area that promote
rapid return of the facility to baseline activity.
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
o PCP-R10.1: Describe policies and procedures for rehabilitation of patient
care and clinical support personnel.
o PCP-R10.2: Describe procedures for reassessing your clinical area’s
patient population and planning for resolving surge needs.
o PCP-R10.3: Describe the responsibilities, specific to your role, for
rehabilitation of your clinical area.
o PCP-R10.4: Describe the policies and procedures for formal After Action
Report of patient care in your clinical area.
Skills
o PCP-R10.5: Demonstrate an understanding of the importance of personnel
rehabilitation activities by participating in personnel rehabilitation as
instructed.
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
72
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
73
o PCP-R10.6: Demonstrate an understanding of facility and equipment
rehabilitation by participating in these procedures to ensure functional area
readiness for day-to-day activities and future EOP activations.
o PCP-R10.7: Demonstrate an understanding of After Action Reports by
submitting items in the required format.
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
Clinical Support Services (CSS)
Personnel that perform tasks related to the medical care of patients without direct patient
interface (e.g. pharmacists, lab technicians, etc.) or provide patient services that aren’t
primarily medical care (social services, physical and occupational therapy, pastoral care,
patient educators, and others) or provide patient care services under the direct supervision
of patient care providers (such as nurse’s aides, procedure technicians, orderlies,
transporters).
x CSS-R1: Recognize situations related to the support of patient care that
indicate the need for full or partial activation of the healthcare system’s
Emergency Operations Plan (EOP), and report them appropriately and
promptly.
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
o CSS-R1.1: Describe patient presentation data (unusual, signs and
symptoms indicative of deliberate illness/injury, unexpected rapid patient
deterioration, difficult patient interventions such as decontamination, etc.)
that indicate the possible need for EOP activation.
o CSS-R1.2: Describe patient test results and other diagnostic data (positive
blood culture or other infectious disease tests) relevant to your position
that indicate the possible need for EOP activation.
o CSS-R1.3 Describe resources available to Clinical Support Services
Personnel in obtaining additional patient or situational information related
to determining the need for activating the EOP.
o CSS-R1.4: Describe the reporting requirements and the contact methods
when factors are recognized that may indicate the need for possible EOP
activation (full or partial).
Skills
o CSS-R1.5: Identify situations within the Clinical Support Services areas
that should be reported for consideration of full or partial activation of the
healthcare facility’s EOP.
o CSS-R1.6: Report situations within the Clinical Support Services areas by
following EOP notification procedures and contacting the appropriate
person (e.g., page operator, supervisor, etc.) as indicated by your specific
role and by the situation at hand.
o CSS-R1.7: Assist decision-makers with incident recognition by
responding rapidly and adequately to their inquiries and requests for
additional pertinent information (related to patient(s) or otherwise).
x CSS-R2: Participate in the mobilization of your work area to transition from
day-to day operations to incident response organization and process.
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
74
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
o CSS-R2.1: Describe the procedures necessary to prepare your work area,
as indicated, for EOP response and recovery.
Skills
o CSS-R2.2: Ensure maximum patient surge capacity and capability and
organizational resiliency by assisting in the mobilization of your work care
area as described in the EOP.
o CSS-R2.3: Assist with the establishment of triage of patients or the triage
of diagnostic services as indicated by actual or anticipated patient needs,
disease parameters, and expected resource status.
o CSS-R2.4: Assist with the establishment of functions that are inactive
during baseline operations (e.g. command center, alternative treatment
sites) as relevant to your position in the EOP.
o CSS-R2.5: Assist with surge and organizational resiliency by supporting
rapid disposition of existing patients within the healthcare system as
indicated by the EOP.
o CSS-R2.6: Conduct actions as described in the EOP that are indicated for
the specific incident parameters, including resource management and
situation reporting.
o CSS-R2.7: Ensure that external notifications (as relevant to your position)
are coordinated through command and general staff
x CSS-R3: Follow the healthcare Occupant Emergency Procedures (OEP) for
your specific Clinical Support Service work area by assuring protective
actions for patients and staff and by assisting others as necessary to
accomplish the OEP directives.
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
o CSS-R3.1: Describe the component parts of the OEP and your
responsibilities to protect patients and, as indicated by your position,
maintain accountability for patients, patient care information (charts, etc.)
and staff.
o CSS-R3.2: Describe the methods to be used to maintain patient care
during OEP activity, including during shelter-in-place, evacuation, or
emergency events as relevant to your work area.
Skills
o CSS-R3.3: Execute your roles and responsibilities in the facility OEP for
protecting patients, patient information and others (as indicated) by
assisting with evacuating patients and staff, establishing shelter-in-place,
or other actions during OEP operations.
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
75
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
o CSS-R3.4: Ensure continuous patient care by prioritizing and performing
essential clinical and non-clinical interventions during OEP operations.
x CSS-R4: Provide Surge Capacity by participating in the diagnosis of,
treatment of, or recovery of increased numbers of patients (compared with
day-to-day activities), regardless of etiology.
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
o CSS-R4.1: Describe strategies and tactics appropriate to your work area
that provide surge capacity for a significantly increased number of
patients.
o CSS-R4.2: Describe the triage processes necessary to match need with
available resources in your work area.
Skills
o CSS-R4.3: Provide patient surge capacity by instituting and adhering to
the EOP measures designated for your work area.
o CSS-R4.4: Manage or participate in degradation of overall services by
prioritizing critical tasks and activities over less critical ones (as indicated
for your position).
o CSS-R4.5:As indicated by your position, perform ongoing triage
(matching resources to needs) to manage patient load by assigning
priorities for services including diagnostic testing, pharmaceutical
administration, operative intervention, blood infusion, and others.
o CSS-R4.6: Provide continuous input into management decision-making by
projecting resource needs for your work area as appropriate.
x CSS-R5: Provide Surge Capability by participating in the diagnosis of,
treatment of, or recovery of all incoming patients with specialty needs that
vary significantly from day-to-day healthcare system activities.
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
o CSS-R5.1: Describe special etiologies that may tax the facility response,
even with limited numbers of patients.
o CSS-R5.2: Describe threats or hazards posed by these types of patients.
o CSS-R5.3: Describe methods for hazard/threat containment for these types
of patients (as applicable).
o CSS-R5.4: List resources where technical information may be found that
may assist with caring for patients with these needs.
Skills
o CSS-R5.5: Demonstrate understanding of injury and illness associated
with these specialty-needs patients by assisting with the appropriate
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
76
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
interventions to minimize further injury/illness and to maximize patient
recovery.
o CSS-R5.6: Perform special situation procedures per the EOP annexes and
as indicated by event circumstances (e.g., decontamination, isolation, etc.)
o CSS-R5.7: Contain hazards/threats posed by patients (as applicable) by
removing the hazards from the patients, the use of PPE, appropriately
locating patients or other measures.
o CSS-R5.8: Adhere to appropriate chain of custody procedures as
applicable to the particular situation at hand.
x CSS-R6: Provide for efficient information processing for your work area
through both reporting and receiving information according to established
time schedules.
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
o CSS-R6.1: Describe the types of relevant information that are required for
reporting from your work area.
o CSS-R6.2: Describe the format and timing of reporting information from
your work area.
o CSS-R6.3: Describe the methods in which your work area should receive
incident information during emergency response and recovery.
Skills
o CSS-R6.4: Provide input into the healthcare system’s incident action
planning by assisting with updates (as requested) on situation (patient care,
continued or recovered function of patient care systems, etc.), resources
(pharmaceuticals, equipment and medical supplies, etc.), special problems
encountered, and tasks completed in your work area.
o CSS-R6.5: Assist with tracking of incident patients (as appropriate) and
clinical resources by providing updates (as requested) on numbers, types,
and locations of patients as well as resources and interventions required.
o CSP-R6.6: Provide prompt, appropriate notification when work activities
reveal information that dictates major or sudden changes in response
strategies.
o CSP-R6.7: Participate in briefings conducted for your work area.
x CSS-R7: Assist in the management of the psychological impact on victims (as
appropriate), victim families (as appropriate), and staff through both
preventative and therapeutic measures.
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
77
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
o CSS-R7.1: Describe the potential psychological effects on incident victims
and their families and the indicated interventions for your discipline (as
appropriate).
o CSS-R7.2: List the potential psychological effects on responding
personnel and the indicated interventions for your work area.
o CSS-R7.3: Describe preventative methods that may lessen the
psychological impact on victims and their families (as appropriate) and on
staff.
Skills
o CSS-R7.4: Provide psychological and emotional support to patients and
their families as indicated by your position and assigned by your
supervisor.
o CSS-R7.5: Provide information on the event, its etiology, and healthcare
system interventions to patients and family members in your work area, as
assigned by your supervisor.
o CSS-R7.6: Assist with the identification of specific stressors for staff in
your work area and report them to your supervisor.
o CSS-R7.7: Assist with assigned measures designed to reduce staff stress
during response and recovery (e.g. facilitating information dissemination
amongst staff).
x CSS-R8: Incorporate relevant safety practices and procedures in all of your
activities as relevant to your work area.
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
o CSS-R8.1: Describe categories of hazards that may pose a risk to staff
during emergency response and recovery.
o CSS-R8.2: Describe interventions for Clinical Support Staff and others to
reduce the potential risk created by incident parameters.
Skills
o CSS-R8.3: Participate in or conduct safety briefings (based upon the
incident Safety Plan) during each work cycle.
o CSS-R8.4: Adhere to universal precautions and infection control
procedures (whether day-to-day or specific to the incident) as well as other
relevant workplace safety practices as indicated.
o CSS-R8.5: Adhere to appropriate work cycles for your clinical services
support area.
o CSS-R8.6: Select and use appropriate PPE when applicable.
o CSS-R8.7: Provide for safe use of PPE by monitoring co-workers utilizing
PPE.
o CSS-R8.8: Minimize security-safety risk to clinical services support
personnel by coordinating with healthcare system police and security
personnel.
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
78
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
79
x CSS-R9: Assist in the integration of outside resources into your work area as
required to meet response objectives.
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
o CSS-R9.1: Describe general procedures for requesting, receiving, briefing,
assigning and supervising personnel from other departments or from other
healthcare systems assigned to your work area.
o CSS-R9.2: Describe procedures for requesting, receiving, rapid inservicing and using equipment and supplies (especially items that aren’t
normally used in your work area).
Skills
o CSS-R9.3: Initiate or assist in the process of requesting outside resources
by delineating specific needs in the required format.
o CSS-R9.4: Assist in the integration of personnel from outside your work
area by ensuring they participate in briefings on operations in your area
and monitoring their response actions
o CSS-R9.5: Integrate equipment and supplies from outside your work area
by ensuring familiarity with their use and by tracking their use.
x CSS-R10: Follow recovery procedures for your clinical area that promote
rapid return of the healthcare system to baseline activity.
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
o CSS-R10.1: Describe policies and procedures for rehabilitation of clinical
services support personnel.
o CSS-R10.2: Describe procedures for reassessing your work area’s patient
population and planning for resolving surge needs (as appropriate).
o CSS-R10.3: Describe the responsibilities, specific to your role, for
rehabilitation of your work area.
o CSS-R10.4: Describe the policies and procedures for formal After Action
Report participation relevant to your work area.
Skills
o CSS-R10.5: Participate in personnel rehabilitation as appropriate and as
instructed.
o CSS-R10.6: Participate in healthcare system, facility, and equipment
rehabilitation as relevant to your work area to ensure functional area
preparation for day-to-day activities and future EOP activations.
o CSS-R10.7: Participate in the After Action Report process by submitting
items in the required format and participating in indicated meetings.
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
Police & Security Services (PSS)
Personnel whose day to day job in the healthcare system involves security and the full
range of law enforcement activities. Day-to-day duties may or may not put these
individuals into direct contact with patients.
x PSS-R1: Recognize situations related to the security of the healthcare system
that indicate the need for full or partial activation of the healthcare system’s
Emergency Operations Plan (EOP), and report them appropriately and
promptly.
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
o PSS-R1.1: Describe patient, visitor, or staff actions or characteristics that
indicate the possible need for EOP activation.
o PSC-R1.2: Describe types of information received from external agencies
or entities relevant to Police and Security Services that indicate the
possible need for EOP activation.
o PSS-R1.3: Describe resources available to Police and Security Services
Personnel in obtaining additional situational information related to
determining the need for activating the EOP.
o PSS-R1.4: Describe the reporting requirements and the contact methods
when factors are recognized that may indicate the need for possible EOP
activation (full or partial).
Skills
o PSS-R1.5: Identify Police and Security situations that should be reported
for consideration of full or partial activation of the healthcare facility’s
EOP.
o PSS-R1.6: Report Police and Security situations within your work area by
following EOP notification procedures and contacting the appropriate
person (e.g., page operator, supervisor, etc.) as indicated by your specific
role and by the situation at hand.
o PSS-R1.7: Assist decision-makers with incident recognition by responding
rapidly and adequately to their inquiries and requests for additional
pertinent information (related to patient(s) or otherwise).
x PSS-R2: Participate in the mobilization of the healthcare system Police and
Security Services to transition from day-to day operations to incident
response organization and process.
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
80
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
o PSS-R2.1: Describe the procedures necessary to prepare the healthcare
system for EOP response and recovery as related to Police and Security
Services.
Skills
o PSS-R2.2: Ensure maximum patient surge capacity and capability and
organizational resiliency by assisting in the mobilization of the healthcare
system as described in the appropriate functional or incident specific
annex to the EOP.
o PSS-R2.3: Participate in the mobilization of assets to secure the facility
from internal or external threats.
o PSS-R2.4: Assist with the establishment of functions that are inactive
during baseline operations (e.g. command center, alternative treatment
sites) as relevant to your position in the EOP.
o PSC-R2.5: Conduct actions as described in the EOP that are indicated for
the specific incident parameters, including resource management and
situation reporting.
o PSS-R2.6: Ensure that external notifications (as relevant to your position)
are coordinated through command and general staff
x PSS-R3: Follow the healthcare Occupant Emergency Procedures (OEP) for
Police and Security Services by assuring protective actions for patients and
staff and by assisting others as necessary to accomplish the OEP directives.
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
o PSS-R3.1: Describe the component parts of the OEP and your
responsibilities to protect patients, visitors, and staff through direct control
of hazards and by shielding and/or directing staff, patients and visitors to
safety.
o PSS-R3.2: Describe the methods to be used to maintain patient, visitor,
and staff safety and accountability during OEP activity, including during
shelter-in-place, evacuation, or emergency events.
Skills
o PSS-R3.3: Execute your roles and responsibilities in the facility OEP for
protecting patients, visitors, and staff by assisting with evacuation,
establishing shelter-in-place, or other actions during OEP operations.
x PSS-R4: Manage or participate in the restriction or facilitation of movement
of personnel, visitors, patients, vehicles, and specific resources regardless of
actual or impending hazards.
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
81
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
o PSS-R4.1: Describe strategies and tactics used to restrict or facilitate the
movement of patients, visitors, staff, vehicles, or specific resources as
appropriate to specific hazards.
o PSS-R4.2: Describe structural and other physical barriers that can be
utilized in your specific healthcare system to restrict or facilitate the
movement of patients, visitors, staff, vehicles, or specific resources.
o PSS-R4.3: Describe methodologies for diminishing psychological impacts
and addressing behavioral reactions of individuals encountered while
fulfilling your Police and Security duties.
Skills
o PSS-R4.4: Participate in the healthcare system security operations by
instituting and adhering to the EOP activities for your work area.
o PSS-R4.5: Utilize physical and structural systems appropriate for your
specific healthcare system to restrict or facilitate the movement of patients,
visitors, staff, vehicles, or specific resources.
o PSS-R4.6: Utilize specific interpersonal methods to address the
psychological impact on staff, patients and visitors that PSS interacts with
while fulfilling EOP duties.
x PSS-R5: Manage or participate in investigative, preventive, protective, and
apprehension activities related to EOP activation for the healthcare system.
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
o PSS-R5.1: Describe special hazards that may warrant investigative
activities as related to hospital Police and Security Services.
o PSS-R5.2: Describe investigative procedures to be utilized during EOP
activation as related to threats posed.
o PSS-R5.3: Describe methods for hazard/threat containment for these types
of situations (as applicable).
o PSS-R5.4: List resources where technical information may be found that
may assist with containing these hazards/threats.
Skills
o PSS-R5.5: Initiate and participate in investigation, protection, prevention,
apprehension, and chain of custody procedures used for any special
hazards that pose a threat to healthcare system operations.
o PSS-R5.6: Perform special situation procedures per the EOP annexes and
as indicated by event circumstances (e.g., initiating chain of custody
procedures as appropriate, etc.)
o PSS-R5.7: Contain hazards/threats through removal, protection, isolation,
or neutralization (as appropriate).
x PSS-R6: Provide for efficient information processing for Police and Security
Services through both reporting and receiving information according to
established time schedules.
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
82
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
o PSS-R6.1: Describe the types of relevant information that are required for
reporting from Police and Security Services.
o PSS-R6.2: Describe the format and timing of reporting information from
your work area.
o PSS-R6.3: Describe the methods in which your work area should receive
incident information during emergency response and recovery.
Skills
o PSS-R6.4: Provide input into the healthcare system’s incident action
planning by assisting with updates (as requested) on the situation (security,
crowds, police actions and investigations), PSS resources, special
problems encountered, and tasks completed in your work area.
o PSS-R6.5: Assist with tracking of incident patients (as appropriate) and
resources by providing updates (as requested).
o PSS-R6.6: Provide prompt, appropriate notification when work activities
reveal information that dictates major or sudden changes in response
strategies.
o PSS-R6.7: Participate in briefings conducted for your work area.
x PSS-R7: Incorporate relevant safety practices and procedures in all of your
activities as relevant to your work area.
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
o PSS-R7.1: Describe categories of hazards that may pose a risk to Police
and Security Services staff during emergency response and recovery.
o PSS-R7.2: Describe interventions for Police and Security staff and others
to reduce the potential risk created by incident parameters.
Skills
o PSS-R7.3: Participate in or conduct safety briefings (based upon the
incident Safety Plan) during each work cycle.
o PSS-R7.4: Adhere to universal precautions and infection control
procedures (whether day-to-day or specific to the incident) as well as other
relevant workplace safety practices as indicated.
o PSS-R7.5: Adhere to appropriate work cycles for your work area.
o PSS-R7.6: Select and use appropriate PPE when applicable.
o PSS-R7.7: Provide for safe use of PPE by monitoring co-workers utilizing
PPE.
x PSS-8: Assist in the integration of outside resources into Police and Security
Service work areas as required to meet response objectives.
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
83
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
84
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
o PSS-R8.1: Describe general procedures for requesting, receiving, briefing,
assigning and supervising personnel from other departments or from other
external agencies assigned to Police and Security, including how police
powers are addressed for assisting police personnel.
o PSS-R8.2: Describe procedures for requesting, receiving, rapid inservicing and using equipment and supplies (especially items that aren’t
normally used in Police and Security Services).
Skills
o PSS-R8.3: Initiate or assist in the process of requesting outside resources
by delineating specific needs in the required format.
o PSS-R8.4: Assist in the integration of personnel from outside your work
area by ensuring they participate in briefings on operations in your area
and monitoring their response actions.
o PSS-R8.5: Integrate equipment and supplies from outside your work area
by ensuring familiarity with their use and by tracking their use.
x PSS-R9: Follow recovery procedures for Police and Security Services that
promote rapid return of the healthcare system to baseline activity.
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
o PSS-R9.1: Describe policies and procedures for rehabilitation of Police
and Security personnel. .
o PSS-R9.2: Describe the responsibilities, specific to your role, for
rehabilitation of your work area.
o PSS-R9.3: Describe the policies and procedures for formal After Action
Report participation relevant to police and security services.
Skills
o PSS-R9.4: Participate in personnel rehabilitation as appropriate and as
instructed.
o PSS-R9.5: Participate in healthcare system, facility, and equipment
rehabilitation as relevant to your work area to ensure functional area
preparation for day-to-day activities and future EOP activations.
o PSS-R9.6: Participate in the After Action Report process by submitting
items in the required format and participating in indicated meetings.
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
Facilities and Engineering Services (FES)
Personnel whose day to day job involves maintaining the physical plant and its various
systems. Included in this group are facilities and physical plant personnel, engineers,
grounds personnel, biomedical engineers, food services, communications and IT
personnel. It also usually includes administrative safety positions below the level of the
healthcare system leaders. Day to day duties rarely put these personnel in direct patient
contact.
x FES-R1: Recognize situations related to the physical plant or engineering
infrastructure of the healthcare system that indicate the need for full or
partial activation of the healthcare system’s Emergency Operations Plan
(EOP), and report them appropriately and promptly.
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
o FES-R1.1: Describe physical plant or engineering infrastructure
characteristics, relevant to your position, that indicate the possible need for
EOP activation.
o FES-R1.2: Describe types of information received from external agencies
or entities relevant to Facilities and Engineering Services that indicate the
possible need for EOP activation.
o FES-R1.3: Describe resources available to Facility and Engineering
Services Personnel in obtaining additional situational information related
to determining the need for activating the EOP.
o FES-R1.4: Describe the reporting requirements and the contact methods
when factors are recognized that may indicate the need for possible EOP
activation (full or partial).
Skills
o FES-R1.5: Identify Facilities and Engineering situations within your
regular day-to-day role that should be reported for consideration of full or
partial activation of the healthcare facility’s EOP.
o FES-R1.6: Report Facilities and Engineering situations within your work
area by following EOP notification procedures and contacting the
appropriate person (e.g., page operator, supervisor, etc.) as indicated by
your specific role and by the situation at hand.
o FES-R1.7: Assist decision-makers with incident recognition by responding
rapidly and adequately to their inquiries and requests for additional
pertinent information (related to patient(s) or otherwise).
x FES-R2: Participate in the mobilization of the healthcare system Facility and
Engineering Services to transition from day-to day operations to incident
response organization and process.
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
85
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
o FES-R2.1: Describe the procedures necessary to prepare the healthcare
system for EOP response and recovery as related to Facility and
Engineering Services.
Skills
o FES-R2.2: Ensure maximum patient surge capacity and capability and
organizational resiliency by assisting in the mobilization of the healthcare
system as described in the appropriate functional or incident specific
annex to the EOP.
o FES-R2.3: Participate in the mobilization of assets to secure the facility
from internal or external threats.
o FES-R2.4: Assist with the establishment of functions that are inactive
during baseline operations (e.g. command center, alternative treatment
sites) as relevant to your position in the EOP.
o FES-R2.5: Conduct actions as described in the EOP that are indicated for
the specific incident parameters, including resource management and
situation reporting.
o FES-R2.6: Ensure that external notifications (as relevant to your position)
are coordinated through command and general staff
x FES-R3: Follow the healthcare Occupant Emergency Procedures (OEP) by
assuring engineering and infrastructure controls are appropriately activated
or de-activated and by assisting others as necessary to accomplish the OEP
directives.
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
o FES-R3.1: Describe the component parts of the OEP and your
responsibilities to activate or de-activate engineering and infrastructure
controls.
o FES-R3.2: Describe the methods to be used to maintain patient, visitor,
and staff safety and accountability during OEP activity, including during
shelter-in-place, evacuation, or emergency events.
Skills
o FES-R3.3: Execute your roles and responsibilities in the facility OEP for
activating or de-activating engineering and infrastructure controls to assist
with evacuation, establishing shelter-in-place, or other actions during OEP
operations.
x FES-R4: Manage or participate in the implementation of facility and
engineering back-up systems and the repair of active systems relevant to
actual or impending hazard impact.
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
86
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
o FES-R4.1: List critical facility and engineering systems for your specific
healthcare system.
o FES-R4.2: Describe processes and procedures to implement and maintain
back up systems for your specific healthcare system.
o FES-R4.3: Describe processes and procedures to expedite repairs to
mission critical systems for your healthcare system.
Skills
o FES-R4.3: Utilize EOP processes and procedures to implement facility
and engineering back up systems for your healthcare system.
o FES-R4.4: Prioritize and expedite the repair of mission critical facility
and engineering systems for your healthcare system.
x FES-R5: Manage or participate in hazard containment (as appropriate) for
your healthcare system.
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
o FES-R5.1: Describe special hazards that may warrant containment
activities as related to hospital Facilities and Engineering Services.
o FES-R5.2: Describe methods for hazard/threat containment for these types
of situations (as applicable).
o FES-R5.3: List resources where technical information may be found that
may assist with containing these hazards/threats.
Skills
o FES-R5.4: Initiate and participate in containment procedures used for any
special hazards that pose a threat to healthcare system operations.
o FES-R5.5: Perform special situation procedures per the EOP annexes and
as indicated by event circumstances (e.g., isolation of specific facility
areas, etc.)
o FES-R5.6: Contain hazards/threats through removal, protection, isolation,
or neutralization (as appropriate).
x FES-R6: Provide for efficient information processing for Facilities and
Engineering Services through both reporting and receiving information
according to established time schedules.
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
o FES-R6.1: Describe the types of relevant information that are required for
reporting from Facilities and Engineering Services.
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
87
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
o FES-R6.2: Describe the format and timing of reporting information from
your work area.
o FES-R6.3: Describe the methods in which your work area should receive
incident information during emergency response and recovery.
Skills
o FES-R6.4: Provide input into the healthcare system’s incident action
planning by assisting with updates (as requested) on situation (facilities
impact resolution, functionality of mission critical operating systems, etc.),
resources, special problems encountered, and tasks completed in your
work area.
o FES-R6.5: Assist with tracking of resources by providing updates (as
requested).
o FES-R6.6: Provide prompt, appropriate notification when work activities
reveal information that dictates major or sudden changes in response
strategies.
o FES-R6.7: Participate in briefings conducted for your work area.
x FES-R7: Incorporate relevant safety practices and procedures in all of your
activities as relevant to your work area.
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
o FES-R7.1: Describe categories of hazards that may pose a risk to facilities
and engineering staff during emergency response and recovery.
o FES-R7.2: Describe interventions for facilities and engineering staff and
others to reduce the potential risk created by incident parameters.
Skills
o FES-R7.3: Participate in or conduct safety briefings (based upon the
Incident Safety Plan) during each work cycle.
o FES-R7.4: Adhere to universal precautions and infection control
procedures (whether day-to-day or specific to the incident) as well as other
relevant workplace safety practices as indicated.
o FES-R7.5: Adhere to appropriate work cycles for your work area.
o FES-R7.6: Select and use appropriate PPE when applicable.
o FES-R7.7: Provide for safe use of PPE by monitoring co-workers utilizing
PPE.
x FES-R8: Assist in the integration of outside resources into Facilities and
Engineering work areas as required to meet response objectives.
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
88
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
89
o FES-R8.1: Describe general procedures for requesting, receiving, briefing,
assigning and supervising personnel from other departments or from other
external agencies assigned to Facilities and Engineering.
o FES-R8.2: Describe procedures for requesting, receiving, rapid inservicing and using equipment and supplies (especially items that aren’t
normally used in Facilities and Engineering Services).
Skills
o FES-R8.3: Initiate or assist in the process of requesting outside resources
by delineating specific needs in the required format.
o FES-R8.4: Assist in the integration of personnel from outside your work
area by ensuring they participate in briefings on operations in your area
and monitoring their response actions
o FES-R8.5: Integrate equipment and supplies from outside your work area
by ensuring familiarity with their use and by tracking their use.
x FES-R9: Follow recovery procedures for Facilities and Engineering that
promote rapid return of the healthcare system to baseline activity.
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
o FES-R9.1: Describe policies and procedures for rehabilitation of Facility
and Engineering personnel. .
o FES-R9.2: Describe the responsibilities, specific to your role, for
rehabilitation of the physical plant and mission critical systems relevant to
Facility and Engineering Services.
o FES-R9.3: Describe the policies and procedures for formal After Action
Report participation relevant to Facilities and Engineering.
Skills
o FES-R9.4: Participate in personnel rehabilitation as appropriate and as
instructed.
o FES-R9.5: Participate in healthcare system, facility, and equipment
rehabilitation as relevant to your work area to ensure functional area
preparation for day-to-day activities and future EOP activations.
o FES-R9.6: Participate in the After Action Report process by submitting
items in the required format and participating in indicated meetings.
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
90
Emergency Management Program Competencies21
The “program competencies” address the Emergency Management (EM) phases of
mitigation and preparedness, and the post-incident/post-exercise activities that
accomplish evaluation and organizational learning objectives. Together with the
emergency response and recovery competencies, they provide a comprehensive set of
performance metrics for each job group within the emergency management program
(EMP) for healthcare systems.
Emergency Management Program Manager (EPM) Job Group
Personnel primarily responsible for developing, implementing and maintaining
healthcare facility and system-wide emergency management (EM) programs that include
the Emergency Operations Plan (EOP). System level emergency program managers,
above the level of individual facilities, (such as VHA Area Emergency Managers or
program managers at the level of the VA Emergency Management Strategic Healthcare
Group) are also included in this job group. It is assumed that the individuals in this job
group will be assigned to a command & general staff ICS position (usually planning
section chief) during response, and so are expected to possess the response and
recovery competencies listed under Healthcare System Leaders as well.
22
x EPM-P1: Apply a ‘systems-based approach’ to the development,
implementation, management, and maintenance of the Emergency
Management Program (EMP).
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: expert level
Knowledge
o EPM-P1.1: Describe the meaning of (definition) and importance of the
following terms in the context of healthcare organization emergency
management: Goal (mission), objective, strategy, and tactic.
o EPM-P1.2: List the sequential steps of a systems-based approach to
program development
o EPM-P1.3: Describe why and how system assumptions are developed and
how they are utilized during mitigation, preparedness, response, and
recovery.
Skills
21 These program competencies, when added to the VHA All Personnel Competencies and the emergency
response and recovery competencies for the specific job group, complete the comprehensive set of EMP
competencies for each specified job group.
22 In some healthcare systems, an EM Program Manager may oversee a more limited position (e.g. program
coordinator) with a narrower range of competencies.
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
o EPM-P1.4: Develop or oversee the development and maintenance of a
clear mission statement for the healthcare organization EMP.
o EPM-P1.5: Apply common managerial strategies that incorporate the
healthcare organization’s mission statement, code of ethics, and core
values into the EMP.
o EPM-P1.6: Apply the sequential steps of a systems approach to
establishing and conducting all relevant EMP activities (For example, the
VHA uses their nine-step implementation process for establishing the
EMP).
o EPM-P1.7: Develop or oversee the development of systems assumptions
for all relevant EMP activities.
x EPM-P2: Apply foundational Emergency Management concepts as they
relate to healthcare organizations.
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
o EPM-P2.1: Describe the principles of Comprehensive Emergency
Management (CEM) as articulated in the 1978 National Governors’
Association report.
o EPM-P2.2: Explain the 13 steps and the emphasis placed on Hazard
Vulnerability Analysis (HVA) and mitigation in the FEMA report
Integrated Emergency Management Systems (IEMS), 1983.
o EPM-P2.3: List and explain the 11 elements of Continuity of Operations
as documented in Federal Preparedness Circular 65 (FEMA, June 2004).
o EPM-P2.4: Describe the origins, purpose, and framework of the National
Incident Management System (NIMS) including variances from
traditional Incident Command System principles.
o EPM-P2.5: Describe the framework, processes, and procedures for
Federal government response as outlined in the National Response Plan
(NRP).
o EPM-P2.6: Describe the components of the four phases of
Comprehensive Emergency Management (Mitigation, Preparedness,
Response and Recovery), and how additional “aspects” can be
incorporated as presented in NFPA 1600 (2007).
o EPM-P2.7: Describe the difference between Emergency Management and
Homeland Security.
o EPM-P2.8: List major findings applicable to healthcare organizations of
disaster sociology research into emergency preparedness and response.
Skills
o EPM-P2.9: Demonstrate that foundational Emergency Management
principles and major findings applicable to healthcare organizations from
disaster sociology research are incorporated into all components of the
EMP.
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
91
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
x EPM-P3: Perform administrative tasks/jobs that permit the Emergency
Management Program (EMP) to meet its overall mission and objectives.
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
o EPM-P3.1: Describe the term ‘strategic administrative planning’ as it
relates to the EMP.
o EPM-P3.2: Describe the relationship of the EMP to the overall healthcare
organization including processes for how the EMP integrates within the
overall administrative structure and functions.
o EPM-P3.3: List relevant regulations and policies (and their origins) for
the EMP. For JCAHO regulations, list specific components applicable to
the EMP.
o EPM-P3.4: List the strategies and tactics necessary for building support to
and maintaining awareness of the EMP (both external and internal to the
healthcare organization).
o EPM-P3.5: Describe the different financial implications of a well run
EMP for a healthcare organization (across all four phases of EM).
o EPM-P3.6: Describe different legal implications for the EMP of a
healthcare organization.
o EPM-P3.7: Identify relevant authorities external to the healthcare
organization and their important relationship to the EMP.
Skills
o EPM-P3.8: Develop an annual work plan for the EMP that includes an
annual program review.
o EPM-P3.9: Maintain required reporting relationship with relevant
healthcare organization authorities that support the EMP.
o EPM-P3.10: Conduct and/or oversee specific activities to meet regulatory
and funding requirements relevant to the EMP (including evaluative
activities required by JCAHO).
o EPM-P3.11: Conduct and/or oversee specific activities to build support
and maintain awareness of the EMP both internal and external to the
healthcare organization.
o EPM-P3.12: Maintain and/or oversee generally accepted accounting
practices for all four phases of CEM within the EMP.
o EPM-P3.13: Incorporate legal considerations into EMP activities to
reduce the potential exposure to litigation.
x EPM-P4: Develop, implement, manage, and maintain an Emergency
Management Committee (EMC) process to support the Emergency
Management Program (EMP).
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: expert level
Knowledge
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
92
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
o EPM-P4.1: Describe the difference between preparedness organizations
and response organizations.
o EPM-P4.2: List relevant representatives that should take part in the EMC
for a healthcare organization.
o EPM-P4.3: Describe general competencies that EMC participants from
within the healthcare organization should possess.
o EPM-P4.4: Describe the necessary processes for the EMC to successfully
operate.
o EPM-P4.5: Describe processes for effective meeting management.
Skills
o EPM-P4.6: Maintain adequate representation on the EMC, including
appropriate representatives from organizations external to the healthcare
organization.
o EPM-P4.7: Establish and supervise EMC sub-committees, plus ad hoc
and standing task groups beyond formal EMC membership as indicated, to
assure adequate representation and expertise in developing and conducting
EM program activities (mitigation, preparedness, organizational learning).
o EPM-P4.8: Maintain and/or supervise the maintenance of adequate
knowledge and skills of internal representatives to the EMC and its task
groups.
o EPM-P4.9: Develop and maintain or oversee the development and
maintenance of document control activities for the EMC.
o EPM-P4.10: Implement and maintain processes to ensure effective
meeting management.
x EPM-P5: Develop, implement, and maintain a Hazard Vulnerability
Analysis (HVA) process as the foundation for conducting the Emergency
Management Program (EMP).
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: expert level
Knowledge
o EPM-P5.1: Define the terms hazard, vulnerability, risk, and risk
management in the context of healthcare organizations and requirements.
o EPM-P5.2: Describe the purpose, context, and timing of the HVA process
within a healthcare organization’s EMP.
o EPM-P5.3: Describe unique characteristics of healthcare organizations
that contribute to their overall vulnerability.
o EPM-P5.4: List representative external agencies and organizations that
should be considered for inclusion in a healthcare organization’s HVA
process.
o EPM –P5.5: List internal and external stakeholders that should be
considered for inclusion in a healthcare organization’s HVA process.
o EPM-P5.6: List different methods for identifying potential hazards to the
healthcare organization.
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
93
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
o EPM-P5.7: Describe the process of analyzing the risk (probability and
vulnerability) created by each identified hazard, including a standardized
deconstruction of each hazard vulnerability.
o EPM-P5.8: Describe the process of grouping and prioritizing
vulnerabilities to provide potential EMP risk interventions.
o EPM-P5.9: Describe various ways in which HVA findings may be applied
as a basis for planning and evaluating the EMP activities.
Skills
o EPM-P5.10: Oversee or individually develop, implement, and maintain
an HVA process that is continually performed throughout the life cycle of
the EMP.
o EPM-P5.11: Incorporate relevant stakeholders (personnel and agencies)
into the HVA process, both from internal and external to the healthcare
organization.
o EPM-P5.12: Ensure the HVA process is able to identify all possible
hazard types that could significantly impact the healthcare organization.
o EPM-P5.13: Develop, implement, and maintain a consistent methodology
for analyzing the risk for identified hazards in the HVA process.
o EPM-P5.14: Develop, implement, and maintain a consistent process for
grouping and prioritizing vulnerabilities in the HVA process.
o EPM-P5.15: Develop, implement, and maintain a consistent process for
incorporating HVA findings into the EMP.
x EPM-P6: Incorporate comprehensive mitigation planning into the
healthcare organization’s Emergency Management Program (EMP).
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: expert level
Knowledge
o EPM-P6.1: Describe the distinction between HVA planning and
mitigation planning.
o EPM-P6.2: List different types of mitigation activities relevant to
healthcare organizations.
o EPM-P6.3: Describe the context and timing of mitigation planning for
healthcare organizations.
o EPM-P6.4: Describe different strategies for managing and conducting
healthcare organization mitigation planning.
o EPM-P6.5: Explain the process of establishing cost-benefit ratios for each
potential mitigation action.
o EPM-P6.6: Describe the outline of a mitigation plan for healthcare
organizations.
Skills
o EPM-P6.7: Oversee or individually maintain mitigation planning
activities throughout the life cycle of the EMP.
o EPM-P6.8: Oversee or individually maintain integrated mitigation efforts
that include appropriate external parties and that avoid unnecessary
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
94
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
overlap with the efforts of other sectors (such as Safety) in the healthcare
organization.
o EPM-P6.9: Ensure that the mitigation planning for the healthcare
organization addresses both long-term as well as short term strategies and
cover structural and non-structural mitigation interventions.
o EPM-P6.10: Develop, implement, manage, and maintain a process for
prioritizing mitigation activities consistent with risk and funding
parameters.
o EPM-P6.11: Develop and maintain a consistent template for mitigation
planning.
x EPM-P7: Incorporate comprehensive preparedness planning into the
healthcare organization’s Emergency Management Program (EMP).
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: expert level
Knowledge
o EPM-P7.1: Describe the context and essential elements of preparedness
planning for a healthcare organization.
o EPM-P7.2: List components of a comprehensive healthcare organization
Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) based upon national standards such as
the National Response Plan and FEMA State and Local Guide (SLG 101).
o EPM-P7.3: Describe how the healthcare organization EOP should be
utilized across the phases of Comprehensive Emergency Management.
o EPM-P7.4: Describe the four primary tasks in resource management as
presented in the National Incident Management System (NIMS) and the
categories of preparedness resource management tasks for a healthcare
organization.
o EPM-P7.5: List the essential components of a mutual aid instrument and
differentiate from a cooperative agreement.
o EPM-P7.6: Describe the relevance of and methodologies for
incorporating input from external agencies into healthcare organization
preparedness planning.
o EPM-P7.7: Outline the core components of a healthcare organization
preparedness plan.
o EPM-P7.8: Describe the importance of and the methods for assuring
coordinated response with other local and regional healthcare
organizations.
o EPM-P7.9: Describe the components of personal and family preparedness
for healthcare organization personnel.
Skills
o EPM-P7.10: Maintain as a core focus for the EMP the development,
implementation, and maintenance of the healthcare organization EOP,
including all annexes and appendices and service-level planning.
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
95
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
o EPM-P7.11: Oversee the development of the healthcare organization EOP
that is functionally based and establishes all-hazards processes for
response and recovery.
o EPM-P7.12: Use the HVA to determine issues that should be specifically
addressed in the EOP, and apply HVA findings in developing appropriate
Support and/or Incident Specific Annexes for the EOP, and in establishing
specific operating procedures across the EOP.
o EPM-P7.13: Supervise and assist, through the EMC, task groups to
produce organization-level and service-level planning in the functional,
incident-specific, and support annex(es), service-levcel plans, and other
relevant program-specific plans for the organization.
o EPM-P7.14: Provide continuous preparedness resource management
oversight to the EMP that includes concepts such as competency
certifications, resource descriptions and requirements, resource
acquisition, accountability, finance, and resource maintenance.
o EPM-P7.15: Participate in the development and maintenance of a
response platform for sharing incident notification and incident
information with other local and regional healthcare organizations during
incident response, as well as coordinating response objectives and
strategies and resource requests.
o EPM-P7.16: Oversee the development of tactical mutual aid instruments
and cooperative agreements with external entities that are consistent with
relevant strategic mutual aid instruments.
o EPM-P7.17: Develop and implement a consistent template for
preparedness planning.
o EPM-P7.18: Oversee the implementation and maintenance of personal
and family preparedness planning for the healthcare organization’s
personnel.
o EPM-P7.19: Develop and maintain an appropriate personal and family
preparedness plan (see AP-R7 for further detail).
x EPM-P8: Incorporate continuity planning into the activities of the
healthcare organization’s Emergency Management Program (EMP) to
ensure organizational continuity and resiliency of mission critical functions,
processes and systems.
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: expert level
Knowledge
o EPM-P8.1: Describe the relationship of continuity planning to the
healthcare organization HVA process and the four phases of
Comprehensive Emergency Management.
o EPM-P8.2: Identify priority functions, processes and systems relevant to
continuity planning for healthcare organizations.
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
96
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
o EPM-P8.3: Describe the concept of leadership succession and delegation
of authority as it relates to healthcare organizations, and explain its
importance.
o EPM-P8.4: Describe how mission critical continuity planning
considerations may be cross-walked to incorporate interventions into a
well written healthcare organization Emergency Operations Plan (EOP).
Skills
o EPM-P8.5: Oversee the incorporation of continuity planning principles
into the healthcare organization’s HVA process and the four phases of the
EMP.
o EPM-P8.6: Develop and maintain a consistent methodology for the
prioritization of processes and systems for the purposes of continuity
planning.
o EPM-P8.7: Oversee or develop a process for leadership succession and
delegation of authority as it relates to the healthcare organization.
o EPM-P8.8: Oversee the development of a Continuity of Operations plan
(or functional annex if appropriate), and otherwise ensure the
incorporation of continuity planning into the healthcare facility EOP and
service-level plans.
x EPM-P9: Incorporate comprehensive instructional activity into the
preparedness activities of the healthcare organization Emergency
Management Program (EMP).
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: expert level
Knowledge
o EPM-P9.1: Define and describe the purpose of the three main types of
instructional activity (education, training, drills).
o EPM-P9.2: Describe the role and application of competencies and
respective levels of proficiency in relation to the healthcare organization’s
EMP.
o EPM-P9.3: Relate the competencies used for a healthcare organization’s
EMP to the “job/task analysis” or position descriptions necessary for
emergency response and recovery.
o EPM-P9.4: Lists different mandates that delineate legal, regulatory, or
accreditation standards applicable to emergency response and recovery
position descriptions and the component competencies.
o EPM-P9.5: Describe the phases and iterative components of Instructional
System Development (ISD) in relation to the healthcare organization’s
EMP.
o EPM-P9.6: Explain the advantages and disadvantages of developing
instructional activities internally to the healthcare organization as
contrasted with contracting outside vendors or other external sources for
this service.
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
97
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
o EPM-P9.7: Define and describe the difference between certifications and
qualifications.
Skills
o EPM-P9.8: Oversee the development and maintenance of a competency
framework for the healthcare organization’s EMP.
o EPM-P9.9: Oversee the development of competencies and levels of
proficiency for functional groups and individual response and recovery
positions for the healthcare organization’s EMP.
o EPM-P9.10: Utilize the ISD process for the analysis, design,
development, implementation, and evaluation of instructional activities
related to the healthcare organization’s EMP.
o EPM-P9.11: Oversee the development and maintenance of a system for
recording position certifications and qualifications.
x EPM-P10: Incorporate a range of exercise types into the healthcare
organizations Emergency Management Program (EMP).
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: expert level
Knowledge
o EPM-P10.1: Define and describe the different types of exercises that may
be employed by a healthcare organization’s EMP and explain the purpose
of each exercise type.
o EPM-P10.2: Describe the JCAHO standards relevant to a healthcare
organization’s EMP exercise program.
o EPM-P10.3: Describe the application of the Instructional System
Development (ISD) process to exercise analysis, design, development,
implementation and evaluation.
o EPM-P10.4: List essential personnel, processes, and other preparations
necessary for a healthcare organization exercise.
o EPM-P10.5: Describe essential considerations for managing a healthcare
organization’s exercise, including the emphasis on exercise safety.
o EPM-P10.6: Describe exercise planning and other relevant processes that
make exercise an evaluative tool for the healthcare organization’s EMP
Skills
o EPM-P10.7: Oversee the appropriate utilization of the different types of
exercises for the healthcare organization’s EMP.
o EPM-P10.8: Ensure adherence to JCAHO requirements regarding the
healthcare organization’s exercises.
o EPM-P10.9: Utilize the ISD process for the development and conduct of
healthcare organization exercises.
o EPM-P10.10: Oversee the development and maintenance of a consistent
methodology during exercise preparation.
o EPM-P10.11: Oversee the development and maintenance of a consistent
methodology for the conduct of exercises, including the use of ICS
principles where applicable.
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
98
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
o EPM-P10.12: Oversee the development of evaluative tools and processes
for all exercises.
x EPM-P11: Demonstrate systems-based evaluation of the healthcare
organization’s overall Emergency Management Program (EMP) and its
Emergency Operations Plan (EOP).
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: expert level
Knowledge
o EPM-P11.1: Describe the context, purpose and timing of program
evaluations in relation to the healthcare organization’s EMP.
o EPM-P11.2: Describe the differences between summative and formative
evaluations and their application to the healthcare organization’s EMP.
o EPM-P11.3: Describe the different categories of performance measures
(and metrics) and their applicability to the healthcare organization’s EMP.
o EPM-P11.4: Describe methodologies for the selection of performance
measures most appropriate to the healthcare organization’s EMP,
including evaluation methods for use during exercises.
o EPM-P11.5: Describe various methods for collecting evaluation
information for the healthcare organization’s EMP.
o EPM-P11.6: Describe the different steps of “Performance-based
Programmatic Evaluation.”
o EPM-P11.7: Describe the role, purpose, and methods for conducting the
After Action Report (AAR) process in a healthcare organization’s EMP
system evaluation.
Skills
o EPM-P11.8: Apply both formative and summative evaluations to the
healthcare organization EMP.
o EPM-P11.9: Utilize different performance measures (inputs, processes,
outputs, and outcomes) in an appropriate manner to maximize the
effectiveness of the EMP evaluation.
o EPM-P11.10: Oversee the implementation of the different steps of
‘Performance based Programmatic Evaluation’ in relation to the
healthcare organization EMP.
o EPM-P11.11: Develop and maintain a consistent methodology for
conducting an After Action Report process.
x EPM-P12: Demonstrate incorporation of accepted improvement
recommendations into the EMP and its components such that the process
becomes one of a learning organization.
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: expert level
Knowledge
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
99
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
o EPM-P12.1: Describe the relevance of organizational learning to the EMP
and how this systems-based approach to improvement may be applied to
mitigation, preparedness, response, and recovery
o EPM-P12.2: List methods for capturing, cataloguing, prioritizing, and
incorporating issues discovered during the AAR process.
Skills
o EPM-P12.3: Develop and maintain a consistent methodology for
capturing, cataloguing, prioritizing, and incorporating issues discovered
during the AAR process.
o EPM-P12.4: Apply the principles of organizational learning to all
relevant EMP activities.
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
100
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
Healthcare System Leaders (HSL) Job Group
Hospital and/or healthcare system-wide senior executives (CEO, COO, CFO), hospitalwide managers, department heads, nursing executives, chief of the medical staff, and/or
senior managers in large departments or key operating units. It is assumed that members
of this job group, due to their everyday organizational positions, would be assigned to
serve in the command and general staff positions of an ICS structure during a healthcare
system’s emergency response.
x HSL-P1: Apply foundational Emergency Management concepts as they
relate to healthcare organizations.
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: awareness level
Knowledge
o HSL-P1.1: Describe the origins, purpose, and framework of the National
Incident Management System (NIMS) including variances from
traditional Incident Command System principles.
o HSL-P1.2: Describe the framework, processes, and procedures for
Federal government response as outlined in the National Response Plan
(NRP).
o HSL-P1.3: Describe the components of the four phases of Comprehensive
Emergency Management (Mitigation, Preparedness, Response and
Recovery), and how additional “aspects” can be incorporated as presented
in NFPA 1600 (2007).
o HSL-P1.4: Describe the difference between Emergency Management and
Homeland Security.
o HSL-P1.5: List major findings applicable to healthcare organizations of
disaster sociology research into emergency preparedness and response.
Skills
o HSL-P1.6: Demonstrate that foundational Emergency Management
principles and major findings applicable to healthcare organizations from
disaster sociology research are incorporated into all of your work products
related to the EMP.
x HSL-P2: Provide leadership and administrative support to and participate
in the Emergency Management Program (EMP) in order for it to meet its
overall mission and objectives.
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
o HSL-P2.1: Describe the relationship of the EMP to the overall healthcare
organization including processes for how the EMP integrates within the
overall administrative structure and functions.
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
101
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
102
o HSL-P2.2: List relevant JCAHO regulations and specific components
applicable to the EMP.
o HSL-P2.3: List the strategies and tactics (appropriate to your position)
necessary for building support to and maintaining awareness of the EMP
(both external and internal to the healthcare organization).
o HSL-P2.4: Describe the different financial implications of a well run
EMP for a healthcare organization (across all four phases of EM).
o HSL-P2.5: Describe different legal implications for the EMP of a
healthcare organization.
o HSL-P2.6: Describe the necessary processes for the Emergency
Management Committee (EMC) to successfully operate.
o HSL-P2.7: Describe the responsibility of HSLs to develop and maintain
their service level readiness at all times.
o HSL-P2.8: List the necessary knowledge and skills for your participation
in the EMC.
Skills
o HSL-P2.9: Conduct and/or oversee specific activities to meet JCAHO
requirements or other regulatory and funding requirements as directed by
the Emergency Program Manager.
o HSL-P2.10: Conduct and/or oversee specific activities to build support
and maintain awareness of the EMP both internal and external to the
healthcare organization relevant to your position.
o HSL-P2.11: Maintain and/or oversee generally accepted accounting
practices for all four phases of CEM within the EMP.
o HSL-P2.12: Incorporate legal considerations into EMP activities to
reduce the potential exposure to litigation.
o HSL-P2.13: Maintain adequate representation on the EMC.
o HSL-P2.14: Maintain adequate knowledge and skills required for
participation in the EMC, if assigned to the EMC.
o HSL-P2.15: Utilize established document control activities for all work
products generated for the EMC, if assigned to the EMC.
x HSL-P3: Participate in the Hazard Vulnerability Analysis (HVA) process as
the foundation for conducting the Emergency Management Program
(EMP).23
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
o HSL-P3.1: Define the terms hazard, vulnerability, risk, and risk
management in the context of healthcare organizations and requirements.
o HSL-P3.2: Describe the purpose, context, and timing of the HVA process
within a healthcare organization’s EMP.
23 In the context of these competencies, “participate” indicates that an individual makes substantive
contributions to the activities, procedures, or processes in question and as applicable to their regular
position.
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
o HSL-P3.3: Describe unique characteristics of healthcare organizations
that contribute to their overall vulnerability.
o HSL-P3.4: List different methods for identifying potential hazards to the
healthcare organization.
o HSL-P3.5: Describe various ways in which HVA findings may be applied
as a basis for planning and evaluating the EMP activities.
Skills
o HSL-P3.6: Provide input relevant to your position into the HVA process
that is continually performed throughout the life cycle of the EMP.
o HSL-P3.7: Assist with the process for incorporating HVA findings into
the EMP, as indicated by your specific position.
x HSL-P4: Participate in comprehensive mitigation planning to support the
healthcare organization’s Emergency Management Program (EMP). 2
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
o HSL-P4.1: List different types of mitigation activities relevant to
healthcare organizations.
o HSL-P4.2: Describe the context and timing of mitigation planning for
healthcare organizations.
o HSL-P4.3: Explain the process of establishing cost-benefit ratios for each
potential mitigation action.
Skills
o HSL-P4.4: Provide appropriate input (per your position) into mitigation
planning activities throughout the life cycle of the EMP.
o HSL-P4.5: Manage specific mitigation planning activities, as assigned,
through completion and report appropriately on their status to the
Emergency Management Committee (EMC).
o HSL-P4.6: Incorporate risk and funding parameters into mitigation
activities relevant to your position.
o HSL-P4.7: Apply HVA findings to business decision making as
appropriate to your position.
x HSL-P5: Support and participate in comprehensive preparedness planning
through the healthcare organization’s Emergency Management Program
(EMP).
2
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
o HSL-P5.1: Describe the context and essential elements of preparedness
planning for a healthcare organization.
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
103
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
o HSL-P5.2: List components of a comprehensive healthcare organization
Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) based upon national standards such as
the National Response Plan and FEMA State and Local Guide (SLG 101).
o HSL-P5.3: Describe how the healthcare organization EOP should be
utilized across the phases of Comprehensive Emergency Management.
o HSL-P5.4: Describe the four primary tasks in resource management as
presented in the National Incident Management System (NIMS) and relate
how these are applicable to your duties within the EMP.
o HSL-P5.5: List the essential components of a mutual aid instrument and
differentiate from a cooperative agreement.
o HSL-P5.6: Identify priority functions, processes and systems relevant to
continuity planning for healthcare organizations.
o HSL-P5.7: Describe the components of personal and family preparedness
for healthcare organization personnel.
Skills
o HSL-P5.8: Provide input relevant to your position into the development,
implementation, and maintenance of the healthcare organization EOP.
o HSL P5.9: As appropriate, supervise and/or or participate in task groups
or subcommittees formed to support the EMC.
o HSL P5.10: Manage or participate in service level planning relevant to
your position.
o HSL-P5.11: Provide continuous preparedness resource management
oversight to portions of the EMP relevant to your position.
o HSL-P5.12: Participate with HSL peers from other local and regional
healthcare organizations in setting policy and supporting a response
platform for sharing information and coordinating response objectives and
strategies during incident response.
o HSL-P5.13: Manage and complete tactical mutual aid and cooperative
agreement assignments with external entities and report back to the
Emergency Management Committee (EMC) as appropriate.
o HSL-P5.14: Demonstrate integration of Business Continuity and
Emergency Management principles across all EMP activities.
o HSL-P5.15: Oversee the implementation and maintenance of personal
and family preparedness planning for healthcare organization personnel
you are responsible for during day to day activities.
o HSL-P5.16: Develop and maintain an appropriate personal and family
preparedness plan (see AP-R7 for further detail).
x HSL-P6: Utilize and assist in the conduct of appropriate preparedness
activities (e.g. instruction and exercises) that implement the Emergency
Operations Plan (EOP) for the healthcare organization Emergency
Management Program (EMP).
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operational level
Knowledge
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
104
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
o HSL-P6.1: Define and describe the purpose of the three main types of
instructional activity (education, training, drills).
o HSL-P6.2: Define and describe the different types of exercises that may
be employed by a healthcare organization’s EMP.
o HSL-P6.3: Describe the role and application of competencies and
respective levels of proficiency in relation to the healthcare organization’s
EMP.
o HSL-P6.4: Define and describe the difference between certifications and
qualifications.
o HSL-P6.5: Describe the phases and iterative components of Instructional
System Development (ISD) (analysis, design, development,
implementation and evaluation) in relation to the healthcare organization
instructional and exercise activities.
o HSL-P6.6: Explain the advantages and disadvantages of developing and
conducting instructional and exercise activities internally to the healthcare
organization as contrasted with contracting outside vendors or other
external sources for this service.
o HSL-P6.7: List essential personnel, processes, and other preparations
necessary for a healthcare organization exercise.
o HSL-P6.8: Describe essential considerations for managing a healthcare
organization’s exercise, including the emphasis on exercise safety.
o HSL-P6.9: Describe exercise planning and other relevant processes that
make exercises an evaluative tool for the healthcare organization’s EMP.
Skills
o HSL-P6.10: Provide input as appropriate to your position into the
competency framework for the healthcare organization’s EMP.
o HSL-P6.11: Provide input, as appropriate to your position, into the
development and maintenance of a system for recording position
certifications and qualifications.
o HSL-P6.12: Utilize the ISD process for the analysis, design,
development, implementation, and evaluation of instructional and exercise
activities related to the healthcare organization’s EMP.
o HSL-P6.13: Utilize ICS principles (as appropriate) in the development
and conduct of healthcare organization exercises.
o HSL-P6.14: As appropriate to your position, participate in the
development of evaluative tools and processes for all exercises.
x HSL-P7: Participate in the systems-based evaluation of the healthcare
organization’s overall Emergency Management Program (EMP), including
its Emergency Operations Plan (EOP), and assist in the incorporation of
recommended/accepted changes.2
Recommended proficiency for Primary Competency: operations level
Knowledge
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
105
Appendix C – Healthcare Emergency Management Competencies
Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
The George Washington University
106
o HSL-P7.1: Describe the context, purpose and timing of program
evaluations in relation to the healthcare organization’s EMP.
o HSL-P7.2: Describe various methods for collecting evaluation
information for the healthcare organization’s EMP.
o HSL-P7.3: Describe the role, purpose, and methods for conducting the

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

After Action Report (AAR) process in a healthcare organization’s EMP
system evaluation.
o HSL-P7.4: Describe the relevance of organizational learning to the EMP
and how this systems-based approach to improvement may be applied to
mitigation, preparedness, response, and recovery
Skills
o HSL-P7.5: As appropriate to your position, participate in EMP evaluative
activities throughout all phases of the program (mitigation, preparedness,
response, and recovery).
o HSL-P7.6: Participate in the development and maintenance of a
consistent methodology for conducting an After Action Report process.
o HSL-P7.7: Participate in the development and maintenance of a
consistent methodology for capturing, cataloguing, prioritizing, and
incorporating issues discovered during the AAR process.

Ethical Dilemmas In The Same Situations With Different People

Ethical Dilemmas In The Same Situations With Different People

100 to 200 words. Time toman 12 APA, reference one- Be deatiled.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

  • Is it possible for one person to have an ethical dilemma with a situation and for another person not to have a dilemma in the same situation? Why or why not?

CMC Rule In Healthcare Emergency Management Discussion

CMC Rule In Healthcare Emergency Management Discussion

Vol. 81 Friday, No. 180 September 16, 2016 Part II Department of Health and Human Services mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES2 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 42 CFR Parts 403, 416, 418, et al. Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Emergency Preparedness Requirements for Medicare and Medicaid Participating Providers and Suppliers; Final Rule VerDate Sep2014 19:01 Sep 15, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\16SER2.SGM 16SER2 63860 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 180 / Friday, September 16, 2016 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 42 CFR Parts 403, 416, 418, 441, 460, 482, 483, 484, 485, 486, 491, and 494 [CMS–3178–F] RIN 0938–AO91 Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Emergency Preparedness Requirements for Medicare and Medicaid Participating Providers and Suppliers Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS. ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: Th

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

is final rule establishes national emergency preparedness requirements for Medicare- and Medicaid-participating providers and suppliers to plan adequately for both natural and man-made disasters, and coordinate with federal, state, tribal, regional, and local emergency preparedness systems. It will also assist providers and suppliers to adequately prepare to meet the needs of patients, residents, clients, and participants during disasters and emergency situations. Despite some variations, our regulations will provide consistent emergency preparedness requirements, enhance patient safety during emergencies for persons served by Medicare- and Medicaid-participating facilities, and establish a more coordinated and defined response to natural and man-made disasters. DATES: Effective date: These regulations are effective on November 15, 2016. Incorporation by reference: The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in the rule is approved by the Director of the Federal Register November 15, 2016. Implementation date: These regulations must be implemented by November 15, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Janice Graham, (410) 786–8020. Mary Collins, (410) 786–3189. Diane Corning, (410) 786–8486. Kianna Banks (410) 786–3498. Ronisha Blackstone, (410) 786–6882. Alpha-Banu Huq, (410) 786–8687. Lisa Parker, (410) 786–4665. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES2 SUMMARY: Acronyms AAAHC Accreditation Association for Ambulatory Health Care, Inc. AAAASF American Association for Accreditation for Ambulatory Surgery Facilities, Inc. VerDate Sep2014 19:01 Sep 15, 2016 Jkt 238001 AAR/IP After Action Report/Improvement Plan ACHC Accreditation Commission for Health Care, Inc. ACHE American College of Healthcare Executives AHA American Hospital Association AO Accrediting Organization AOA/HFAP American Osteopathic Association/Healthcare Facilities Accreditation Program ASC Ambulatory Surgical Center ARCAH Accreditation Requirements for Critical Access Hospitals ASPR Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response BLS Bureau of Labor Statistics BTCDP Bioterrorism Training and Curriculum Development Program CAH Critical Access Hospital CAMCAH Comprehensive Accreditation Manual for Critical Access Hospitals CAMH Comprehensive Accreditation Manual for Hospitals CASPER Certification and the Survey Provider Enhanced Reporting CDC Centers for Disease Control and Prevention CON Certificate of Need CfCs Conditions for Coverage and Conditions for Certification CHAP Community Health Accreditation Program CMHC Community Mental Health Center CMS Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services COI Collection of Information CoPs Conditions of Participation CORF Comprehensive Outpatient Rehabilitation Facilities CPHP Centers for Public Health Preparedness CRI Cities Readiness Initiative DHS Department of Homeland Security DHHS Department of Health and Human Services DNV GL Det Norske Veritas GL—Healthcare DOL Department of Labor DPU Distinct Part Units DSA Donation Service Area EOP Emergency Operations Plans EC Environment of Care EMP Emergency Management Plan EP Emergency Preparedness ESAR–VHP Emergency System for Advance Registration of Volunteer Health Professionals ESF Emergency Support Function ESRD End-Stage Renal Disease FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency FDA Food and Drug Administration FORHP Federal Office of Rural Health Policy FRI Federal Reserve Inventories FQHC Federally Qualified Health Center GAO Government Accountability Office HFAP Healthcare Facilities Accreditation Program HHA Home Health Agencies HPP Hospital Preparedness Program HRSA Health Resources and Services Administration HSC Homeland Security Council HSEEP Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 HSPD Homeland Security Presidential Directive HVA Hazard Vulnerability Analysis or Assessment ICFs/IID Intermediate Care Facilities for Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities ICR Information Collection Requirements IDG Interdisciplinary Group IOM Institute of Medicine JPATS Joint Patient Assessment and Tracking System LEP Limited English Proficiency LD Leadership LPHA Local Public Health Agencies LSC Life Safety Code LTC Long Term Care MMRS Metropolitan Medical Response System MRC Medical Reserve Corps MS Medical Staff NDMS National Disaster Medical System NFs Nursing Facilities NFPA National Fire Protection Association NIMS National Incident Management System NIOSH National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health NLTN National Laboratory Training Network NRP National Response Plan NRF National Response Framework NSS National Security Staff OBRA Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act OIG Office of the Inspector General OPHPR Office of Public Health Preparedness and Response OPO Organ Procurement Organization OPT Outpatient Physical Therapy OPTN Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration PACE Program for the All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly PAHPA Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness Act PAHPRA Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness Reauthorization Act PCT Patient Care Technician PPE Personal Protection Equipment PHEP Public Health Emergency Preparedness PHS Act Public Health Service Act PIN Policy Information Notice PPD Presidential Policy Directive PRTF Psychiatric Residential Treatment Facilities QAPI Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement QIES Quality Improvement and Evaluation System RFA Regulatory Flexibility Act RNHCIs Religious Nonmedical Health Care Institutions RHC Rural Health Clinic SAMHSA Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration SLP Speech Language Pathology SNF Skilled Nursing Facility SNS Strategic National Stockpile TEFRA Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act TFAH Trust for America’s Health TJC The Joint Commission TRACIE Technical Resources, Assistance Center, and Information Exchange E:\FR\FM\16SER2.SGM 16SER2 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 180 / Friday, September 16, 2016 / Rules and Regulations TTX Tabletop Exercise UMRA Unfunded Mandates Reform Act UNOS United Network for Organ Sharing UPMC University of Pittsburgh Medical Center WHO World Health Organization mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES2 Table of Contents I. Overview A. Executive Summary 1. Purpose 2. Summary of the Major Provisions B. Current State of Emergency Preparedness C. Statutory and Regulatory Background II. Provisions of the Proposed Rule and Responses to Public Comments A. General Comments 1. Integrated Health Systems 2. Requests for Technical Assistance and Funding 3. Requirement To Track Patients and Staff B. Implementation Date C. Emergency Preparedness Regulations for Hospitals (§ 482.15) 1. Risk Assessment and Emergency Plan (§ 482.15(a)) 2. Policies and Procedures (§ 482.15(b) 3. Communication Plan (§ 482.15(c) 4. Training and Testing (§ 482.15(d) 5. Emergency Fuel and Generator Testing (§ 482.15(e) D. Emergency Preparedness Regulations for Religious Nonmedical Health Care Institutions (RNHCIs) (§ 403.748) E. Emergency Preparedness Regulations for Ambulatory Surgical Centers (ASCs) (§ 416.54) F. Emergency Preparedness Regulations for Hospices (§ 418.113) G. Emergency Preparedness Regulations for Psychiatric Residential Treatment Facilities (PRTFs) (§ 441.184) H. Emergency Preparedness Regulations for Programs of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) (§ 460.84) I. Emergency Preparedness Regulations for Transplant Centers (§ 482.78) J. Emergency Preparedness Regulations for Long-Term Care (LTC) Facilities (§ 483.73) K. Emergency Preparedness Regulations for Intermediate Care Facilities for Individuals With Intellectual Disabilities (ICF/IID) (§ 483.475) L. Emergency Preparedness Regulations for Home Health Agencies (HHAs) (§ 484.22) M. Emergency Preparedness Regulations for Comprehensive Outpatient Rehabilitation Facilities (CORFs) (§ 485.68) N. Emergency Preparedness Regulations for Critical Access Hospitals (CAHs) (§ 485.625) O. Emergency Preparedness Regulations for Clinics, Rehabilitation Agencies, and Public Health Agencies as Providers of Outpatient Physical Therapy and Speech-Language Pathology Services (Organizations) (§ 485.727) P. Emergency Preparedness Regulations for Community Mental Health Centers (CMHCs) (§ 485.920) Q. Emergency Preparedness Regulations for Organ Procurement Organizations (OPOs) (§ 486.360) VerDate Sep2014 19:01 Sep 15, 2016 Jkt 238001 R. Emergency Preparedness Regulations for Rural Health Clinics (RHCs) and Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) (§ 491.12) S. Emergency Preparedness Regulations for End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Facilities (§ 494.62) III. Provisions of the Final Regulations A. Changes Included in the Final Rule B. Incorporation by Reference IV. Collection of Information V. Regulatory Impact Analysis VI. Waiver of Proposed Rulemaking I. Overview A. Executive Summary 1. Purpose We have reviewed existing Medicare emergency regulatory preparedness requirements for both providers and suppliers. We found that many providers and suppliers have emergency preparedness requirements, but those requirements do not go far enough in ensuring that these providers and suppliers are equipped and prepared to help protect those they serve during emergencies and disasters. Hospitals, for example, are currently required to have emergency power and lighting in some specified areas and there must be facilities for emergency gas and water supply. We believe that these existing requirements are generally insufficient in the face of the needs of the patients, staff and communities, and do not address inconsistency in the level of emergency preparedness amongst healthcare providers. For example, while some accreditation organizations have standards that exceed CMS’ current requirements for hospitals by requiring them to conduct a risk assessment, there are other providers and suppliers who do not have any emergency preparedness requirements, such as Community Mental Health Centers (CMHCs) and Psychiatric Residential Treatment Facilities (PRTFs). We concluded that current emergency preparedness requirements are not comprehensive enough to address the complexities of the actual emergencies. Over the past several years, the United States has been challenged by several natural and manmade disasters. As a result of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, the subsequent anthrax attacks, the catastrophic hurricanes in the Gulf Coast states in 2005, flooding in the Midwestern states in 2008, the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic, tornadoes and floods in the spring of 2011, and Hurricane Sandy in 2012, our nation’s health security and readiness for public health emergencies have been on the national agenda. This final rule issues emergency preparedness requirements PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 63861 that establish a comprehensive, consistent, flexible, and dynamic regulatory approach to emergency preparedness and response that incorporates the lessons learned from the past, combined with the proven best practices of the present. We recognize that central to this approach is to develop and guide emergency preparedness and response within the framework of our national healthcare system. To this end, these requirements also encourage providers and suppliers to coordinate their preparedness efforts within their own communities and states as well as across state lines, as necessary, to achieve their goals. 2. Summary of the Major Provisions We are issuing emergency preparedness requirements that will be consistent and enforceable for all affected Medicare and Medicaid providers and suppliers (referred to collectively as ‘‘facilities,’’ throughout the remainder of this final rule where applicable). This final rule addresses the three key essentials we believe are necessary for maintaining access to healthcare services during emergencies: safeguarding human resources, maintaining business continuity, and protecting physical resources. Current regulations for Medicare and Medicaid providers and suppliers do not adequately address these key elements. Based on our research and consultation with stakeholders, we have identified four core elements that are central to an effective and comprehensive framework of emergency preparedness requirements for the various Medicare- and Medicaidparticipating providers and suppliers. The four elements of the emergency preparedness program are as follows: • Risk assessment and emergency planning: We are requiring facilities to perform a risk assessment that uses an ‘‘all-hazards’’ approach prior to establishing an emergency plan. The allhazards risk assessment will be used to identify the essential components to be integrated into the facility emergency plan. An all-hazards approach is an integrated approach to emergency preparedness planning that focuses on capacities and capabilities that are critical to preparedness for a full spectrum of emergencies or disasters. This approach is specific to the location of the provider or supplier and considers the particular types of hazards most likely to occur in their areas. These may include, but are not limited to, care-related emergencies; equipment and power failures; interruptions in communications, including cyberattacks; loss of a portion or all of a E:\FR\FM\16SER2.SGM 16SER2 mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES2 63862 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 180 / Friday, September 16, 2016 / Rules and Regulations facility; and, interruptions in the normal supply of essentials, such as water and food. Additional information on the emergency preparedness cycle can be found at the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) National Preparedness System Web site located at: https://www.fema.gov/threat-andhazard-identification-and-riskassessment. • Policies and procedures: We are requiring that facilities develop and implement policies and procedures that support the successful execution of the emergency plan and risks identified during the risk assessment process. • Communication plan: We are requiring facilities to develop and maintain an emergency preparedness communication plan that complies with both federal and state law. Patient care must be well-coordinated within the facility, across healthcare providers, and with state and local public health departments and emergency management agencies and systems to protect patient health and safety in the event of a disaster. The following link is to FEMA’s comprehensive preparedness guide to develop and maintain emergency operations plans: https://www.fema.gov/media-librarydata/20130726-1828-25045-0014/ cpg_101_comprehensive_preparedness _guide_developing_and_maintaining _emergency_operations_plans_2010.pdf. During an emergency, it is critical that hospitals, and all providers/suppliers, have a system to contact appropriate staff, patients’ treating physicians, and other necessary persons in a timely manner to ensure continuation of patient care functions throughout the facilities and to ensure that these functions are carried out in a safe and effective manner. • Training and testing: We are requiring that a facility develop and maintain an emergency preparedness training and testing program. A wellorganized, effective training program must include initial training for new and existing staff in emergency preparedness policies and procedures as well as annual refresher trainings. The facility must offer annual emergency preparedness training so that staff can demonstrate knowledge of emergency procedures. The facility must also conduct drills and exercises to test the emergency plan to identify gaps and areas for improvement. The Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP), developed by FEMA, includes a section on the establishment of a Training and Exercise Planning Workshop (TEPW). The TEPW section provides guidance to organizations in conducting an annual TEPW and VerDate Sep2014 19:01 Sep 15, 2016 Jkt 238001 developing a Multi-year Training and Exercise Plan (TEP) in line with the (HSEEP): http://www.fema.gov/medialibrary-data/20130726-1914-250458890/hseep_apr13_.pdf. Medicare and Medicaid participating hospitals and other providers and suppliers through the conditions of participation (CoPs) and conditions for coverage (CfCs) established by this rule. B. Current State of Emergency Preparedness As previously discussed, numerous natural and man-made disasters have challenged the United States over the past several years. Disasters can disrupt the environment of healthcare and change the demand for healthcare services; therefore, it is essential that healthcare facilities integrate emergency management into their daily functions and values. On December 27, 2013, we published a proposed rule titled, ‘‘Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Emergency Preparedness Requirements for Medicare and Medicaid Participating Providers and Suppliers’’ (78 FR 79082). In this proposed rule we included a robust discussion about the current state of emergency preparedness and federal emergency preparedness activities that have established a foundation for the development and expansion of healthcare emergency preparedness systems. In addition, the December 2013 proposed rule included an appendix of the numerous resources and documents used to develop the proposed rule. We refer readers to the proposed rule for this background information. The December 2013 proposed rule included discussion of previous events, such as the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic, the 2001 anthrax attacks, the tornados in 2011 and 2012, and Hurricane Sandy in 2012. In 2014, the United States faced a number of new and emerging diseases, such as MERSCoV and Ebola, and a nationwide outbreak of Enterovirus D68, which was confirmed in 938 people in 46 states between mid-August and October 21, 2014 (http://www.cdc.gov/non-polioenterovirus/outbreaks/EV-D68outbreaks.html). We believe that finalizing the emergency preparedness rule is an important part of improving the national response to Ebola and any infectious disease threats. Healthcare providers have raised concerns about their safety when caring for patients with Ebola, citing the need for advanced preparation, effective policies and procedures, communication plans, and sufficient training and testing, particularly for personal protection equipment (PPE). The response highlighted the importance of establishing written procedures, protocols, and policies ahead of an emergency event. With the finalization of the emergency preparedness rule, this type of planning will be mandated for C. Statutory and Regulatory Background Various sections of the Social Security Act (the Act) define the types of providers and suppliers that may participate in Medicare and Medicaid and list the requirements that each provider and supplier must meet to be eligible for Medicare and Medicaid participation. The Act also authorizes the Secretary to establish other requirements as necessary to protect the health and safety of patients, although the wording of such authority differs slightly between provider and supplier types. Such requirements may include the CoPs for providers, CfCs for suppliers, and requirements for longterm care facilities. The CoPs and CfCs are intended to protect public health and safety and promote high quality care for all persons. Furthermore, the Public Health Service (PHS) Act sets forth additional regulatory requirements that certain Medicare providers and suppliers are required to meet in order to participate. The following are the statutory and regulatory citations for the providers and suppliers for which we are issuing emergency preparedness regulations: • Religious Nonmedical Health Care Institutions (RNHCIs)—section 1821 of the Act and 42 CFR 403.700 through 403.756. • Ambulatory Surgical Centers (ASCs)—section 1832(a)(2)(F)(i) of the Act and 42 CFR 416.2 and 416.40 through 416.52. • Hospices—section 1861(dd)(1) of the Act and 42 CFR 418.52 through 418.116. • Inpatient Psychiatric Services for Individuals Under Age 21 in Psychiatric Residential Treatment Facilities (PRTFs)—sections1905(a) and 1905(h) of the Act and 42 CFR 441.150 through 441.182 and 42 CFR 483.350 through 483.376. • Programs of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE)—sections 1894, 1905(a), and 1934 of the Act and 42 CFR 460.2 through 460.210. • Hospitals—section 1861(e)(9) of the Act and 42 CFR 482.1 through 482.66. • Transplant Centers—sections 1861(e)(9) and 1881(b)(1) of the Act and 42 CFR 482.68 through 482.104. • Long Term Care (LTC) Facilities— Skilled Nursing Facilities (SNFs)— under section 1819 of the Act, Nursing Facilities (NFs)—under section 1919 of the Act, and 42 CFR 483.1 through 483.180. PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\16SER2.SGM 16SER2 mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES2 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 180 / Friday, September 16, 2016 / Rules and Regulations • Intermediate Care Facilities for Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities (ICF/IID)—section 1905(d) of the Act and 42 CFR 483.400 through 483.480. • Home Health Agencies (HHAs)— sections 1861(o), 1891 of the Act and 42 CFR 484.1 through 484.55. • Comprehensive Outpatient Rehabilitation Facilities (CORFs)— section 1861(cc)(2) of the Act and 42 CFR 485.50 through 485.74. • Critical Access Hospitals (CAHs)— sections 1820 and 1861(mm) of the Act and 42 CFR 485.601 through 485.647. • Clinics, Rehabilitation Agencies, and Public Health Agencies as Providers of Outpatient Physical Therapy and Speech-Language Pathology Services— section 1861(p) of the Act and 42 CFR 485.701 through 485.729. • Community Mental Health Centers (CMHCs)—section 1861(ff)(3)(B)(i)(ii) of the Act, section 1913(c)(1) of the PHS Act, and 42 CFR 410.110. • Organ Procurement Organizations (OPOs)—section 1138 of the Act and section 371 of the PHS Act and 42 CFR 486.301 through 486.348. • Rural Health Clinics (RHCs)— section 1861(aa) of the Act and 42 CFR 491.1 through 491.11; Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs)— section 1861(aa) of the Act and 42 CFR 491.1 through 491.11, except 491.3. • End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Facilities—sections 1881(b), 1881(c), 1881(f)(7) of the Act and 42 CFR 494.1 through 494.180. The proposed rule responded to concerns from the Congress, the healthcare community, and the public regarding the ability of healthcare facilities to plan and execute appropriate emergency response procedures for disasters. In the proposed rule, we identified four core elements that we believe are central to an effective emergency preparedness system and must be addressed to offer a more comprehensive framework of emergency preparedness requirements for the various Medicare- and Medicaidparticipating providers and suppliers. The four elements are—(1) risk assessment and emergency planning; (2) policies and procedures; (3) communication plan; and (4) training and testing. We proposed that these core components be used across provider and supplier types as diverse as hospitals, organ procurement organizations, and home health agencies, while attempting to tailor requirements for individual provider and supplier types to meet their specific needs and circumstances, as well as the needs of their patients, residents, clients, and participants. These VerDate Sep2014 19:01 Sep 15, 2016 Jkt 238001 proposals are refined and adopted in this final rule. II. Provisions of the Proposed Rule and Responses to Public Comments In response to our December 2013 proposed rule, we received nearly 400 public comments. Commenters included individuals, healthcare professionals and corporations, national associations, health departments and emergency management professionals, and individual facilities that would be impacted by the regulation. Most comments centered around the hospital requirements, but could be applied to the additional provider and supplier types. We also received comments specific to the requirements we proposed for other individual provider and supplier types. In addition, we solicited comments on specific issues. We have organized our responses to the comments as follows: (1) General comments; (2) implementation date; (3) comments specific to hospitals and those that apply to the overall requirements of the regulation; and (4) comments specific to other providers and suppliers. A. General Comments We received the following comments suggesting improvement to our regulatory approach or requesting clarification of the resources used to develop our proposals: Comment: Most commenters supported our proposal to require Medicare and Medicaid participating facilities to establish an emergency preparedness plan. Many of these commenters noted that this proposal is timely and necessary in light of past emergencies and natural disasters. Response: We thank the commenters for their support. We continue to believe that our current regulations for Medicare and Medicaid providers and suppliers do not adequately address emergency preparedness planning and that emergency preparedness CoPs for providers and CfCs for suppliers should be implemented at this time. Comment: Several commenters disagreed with our proposal to establish emergency preparedness requirements for Medicare and Medicaid providers and suppliers. Some commenters were concerned that this proposal would place undue burden and financial strain on facilities. Most of these commenters stated that it would be difficult to implement additional regulations without additional payment through Medicare, Medicaid, or the Hospital Preparedness Program (HPP). The commenters also stated that facilities PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 63863 would need more time to comply with the proposed requirements. A few commenters disagreed with our statement that hospitals should have emergency preparedness plans and stated that hospitals are already prepared for emergencies. A commenter objected to the statement that hospital leadership has not prioritized disaster preparedness. A commenter recommended that the proposed emergency preparedness requirements be reduced and simplified to reflect the minimum requirements that each provider type is expected to meet. Other commenters objected to the entire proposal and the establishment of additional regulations for healthcare facilities. Response: We disagree with the commenters who stated that the emergency preparedness regulations are inappropriate or unnecessary. Healthcare facilities in the United States have faced many challenges over the years including hurricanes, tornados, floods, wild fires, and pandemics. Facilities that do not have plans established prior to an emergency or a disaster may face difficulties providing continuity of care for their patients. In addition, without proper training, healthcare workers may find it difficult to implement emergency preparedness plans during an emergency or a disaster. Upon review of the current emergency preparedness requirements for providers and suppliers participating in Medicare and Medicaid, we concluded that the current requirements are not comprehensive enough to address the complexities of actual emergencies. We believe that, currently, in the event of a disaster, healthcare facilities across the nation will not have the necessary emergency planning and preparation in place to adequately protect the health and safety of their patients. In addition, we believe that the current regulatory patchwork of federal, state, and local laws and guidelines, combined with various accrediting organizations’ emergency preparedness standards, falls far short of what is needed for healthcare facilities to be adequately prepared for a disaster. Therefore, we proposed to establish comprehensive, consistent, and flexible emergency preparedness regulations that incorporate lessons learned from the past with the proven best practices of the present. Finalizing these proposals, with the modifications discussed later in this final rule, will help healthcare facilities be better prepared in case of a disaster or emergency. We note that the majority of the comments to the proposed rule agree with the establishment of some type of regulatory E:\FR\FM\16SER2.SGM 16SER2 mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES2 63864 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 180 / Friday, September 16, 2016 / Rules and Regulations framework for emergency preparedness planning, which further supports our position that establishing emergency preparedness regulations is the most appropriate course of action. In response to comments that request additional time for compliance or additional funds, we refer readers to the discussion on the implementation date and further discussions on funding in this final rule. Comment: Some commenters stated that the term ‘‘ensure’’ was used numerous times in the proposed rule and that the term was over-used. Commenters stated that in some circumstances we stated providers and suppliers had to ‘‘ensure’’ elements of the plan that might be beyond their control during an emergency. A commenter suggested that we replace the word ‘‘ensure’’ with the term ‘‘strive to achieve.’’ Response: We used the word ‘‘ensure’’ or ‘‘ensuring’’ to convey that each provider and supplier will be held accountable for complying with the requirements in this rule. However, to avoid any ambiguity, we have removed the term ‘‘ensure’’ and ‘‘ensuring’’ from the regulation text of all providers and suppliers and have addressed the requirements in a more direct manner. Comment: Some commenters were concerned that the proposed emergency preparedness requirements duplicate existing requirements by The Joint Commission (TJC). TJC is a CMSapproved accrediting organization that has standards and survey procedures that meet or exceed those used by CMS and state surveyors. Facilities accredited under a Medicare approved accreditation program, such as TJC’s, may be ‘‘deemed’’ by CMS to be in compliance with the CoPs. Most of these commenters recommended that CMS rely on existing TJC standards. Other commenters noted that CMS used TJC manual citations from 2007 through 2008. The commenters noted that changes have been made since then and recommended that CMS refer to the most recent TJC manual. Response: We discussed TJC standards in the proposed rule as a point of reference for emergency preparedness standards that currently exist for healthcare facilities, absent additional federal regulations. We note that CMS has the authority to create and modify CoPs, which establish the requirements a provider must meet to participate in the Medicare or Medicaid program. Also, we note that facilities that exceed CMS’s requirements will still remain compliant. Comment: A few commenters stated that the proposal did not take into VerDate Sep2014 19:01 Sep 15, 2016 Jkt 238001 account the differences that exist between individual facilities. The commenters noted that the proposal does not acknowledge the diversity of different facilities and instead requires a ‘‘one size fits all’’ emergency preparedness plan. The commenters recommended that CMS address the variation between facilities in the emergency preparedness requirements. Some commenters stated that the proposed requirements are inappropriate because they mostly apply to hospitals, and cannot be applied to other healthcare settings. A commenter noted that smaller hospitals with limited capabilities, like LTCHs, should be allowed to work with their local emergency response networks to develop emergency preparedness plans that reflect those hospitals’ limitations. Response: We believe our approach, with the changes to our proposal discussed later in this final rule, appropriately addresses the differences between the 17 provider and supplier types covered by these regulations. We believe that emergency preparedness regulations that are too specific may become outdated over time, as technology and the nature of threats change, and that emergency preparedness regulations that are too broad may be ineffective. Therefore, we proposed four main components that are consistent with the principles as set forth in the National Preparedness Cycle contained within the National Preparedness System (link (see: https:// www.fema.gov/national-preparednesssystem) that can be used across diverse healthcare settings, while tailoring specific requirements for individual provider and supplier types based on their needs and circumstances, as well as the needs and circumstances of their patients, residents, clients, and participants. We continue to believe that these four components, and the variations in the specific requirements of these components, appropriately address variation amongst provider and supplier settings and facilities with an appropriate amount of flexibility. We do not believe that we have taken a ‘‘one size fits all’’ approach in these regulations. We agree with the commenter who stated that smaller hospitals should be allowed to work with their local health department and emergency management agency to develop emergency preparedness plans and we encourage these facilities to engage in healthcare coalitions in their area for assistance in meeting these requirements. However, we note that we are not mandating that smaller facilities confer with local emergency response networks while PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 developing their emergency preparedness plans. Comment: A few commenters stated that the proposed provisions were too specific and detailed. Some commenters believed that, like other CoPs, the proposal should include provisions that are more flexible. The commenters noted that more specificity should be included in CMS’ interpretive guidance documents (IGs). Response: We disagree with commenters. We believe that these regulations strike a balance between the specific and the general. We have not prescribed or mandated specific technology or tools, nor have we included detailed requirements for how emergency preparedness plans should be written. The regulations are broad enough that facilities can formulate an effective emergency preparedness plan, based on a facility-based and community-based risk assessment utilizing an all-hazards approach, that includes appropriate policies and procedures, a communication plan, and training and testing. In meeting the emergency preparedness requirements, providers can tailor specific details to their facilities’ and their patients’ needs. Facilities can also exceed the requirements in this final rule, if they believe it is in their patients’ and their facilities’ interests to do so. Comment: A few commenters suggested that CMS require facilities to include other entities, stakeholders, and individuals in their emergency preparedness planning. Specifically, a few commenters suggested that facilities include patients, their family members, and vulnerable populations, including older adults, people with disabilities, and those who are linguistically isolated, in their emergency preparedness planning. A few commenters also recommended that facilities include patients and their families in emergency preparedness education. A few commenters recommended that front line workers and their workers’ unions be included in the emergency preparedness planning. A commenter suggested that CMS emphasize the full continuum of emergency management activities and identify relevant national associations and resources for each provider type. A commenter noted that local emergency management officials are rarely included in emergency planning. The commenter recommended adding a requirement that would require facilities to submit their emergency preparedness plan to their local emergency management agency for review and assessment, and for assistance on sheltering and evacuation procedures. E:\FR\FM\16SER2.SGM 16SER2 mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES2 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 180 / Friday, September 16, 2016 / Rules and Regulations Response: In the proposed rule, we proposed to require certain facilities to develop a method for sharing information from the emergency plan that the facility determines is appropriate with patients/residents and their families or representatives. A facility may choose to involve other entities in the development of an emergency preparedness plan or they can provide emergency preparedness education to patients’ families and caregivers. During the development of the emergency plan, facilities may also choose to include patients, community members and others in the process. However, we are not mandating these actions as we believe such a requirement would impose an excessive burden on providers and suppliers; instead, we encourage and will allow facilities the discretion to confer with entities and resources that they consider appropriate while creating an emergency preparedness plan and strongly encourage that facilities include individuals with disabilities and others with access and functional needs in their planning. Comment: A commenter recommended that emergency preparedness plans should account for children’s special needs during an emergency. The commenter stated that emergency preparedness plans should include children’s medication and medical device needs, challenges regarding patient transfer for neonatal and pediatric intensive care patients, and issues involving behavioral health and family reunification. A commenter recommended that CMS collaborate closely with the Emergency Medical Services for Children (EMSC) program administered by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA). The commenter noted that this program focuses on improving the pediatric components of the EMS system. Response: We appreciate the commenter’s concerns. As required in § 482.15(a)(1), (2), and (3), when a provider or supplier develops an emergency preparedness plan, we will expect that the provider/supplier will use a facility-based and communitybased risk assessment to develop a plan that addresses that facility’s patient population, including at-risk populations. If the provider serves children, or if the majority of its patient population is children, as is the case for children’s hospitals, we will expect the provider to take into account children’s access and functional needs during an emergency or disaster in its emergency preparedness plan. VerDate Sep2014 19:01 Sep 15, 2016 Jkt 238001 Comment: A few commenters questioned CMS’ definition of an emergency. A commenter disagreed with the proposed rule’s definition of ‘‘emergency’’ and ‘‘disaster.’’ The commenter stated that the proposed rule definitions exclude internal or smaller disasters that a hospital may declare. Furthermore, the commenter noted that the definitions should include mass casualty incidents and internal emergencies or disasters that a facility may declare. Another commenter requested clarification as to whether the regulation applies to external or internal emergencies. Response: In the proposed rule, we defined an ‘‘emergency’’ or ‘‘disaster’’ as an event affecting the overall target population or the community at large that precipitates the declaration of a state of emergency at a local, state, regional, or national level by an authorized public official such as a Governor, the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), or the President of the United States. However, we agree with the commenter’s observation that the definition of an ‘‘emergency’’ or ‘‘disaster’’ should include internal emergency or disaster events. Therefore, we clarify our statement that an ‘‘emergency’’ or ‘‘disaster’’ is an event that can affect the facility internally as well as the overall target population or the community at large. We believe that hospitals should have a single emergency plan that addresses all-hazards, including internal emergencies and a man-made emergency (or both) or natural disaster. Hospitals have the discretion to determine when to activate their emergency plan and whether to apply their emergency plan to internal or smaller emergencies or disasters that may occur within their facilities. We encourage hospitals to prepare for allhazards that may affect their patient population and apply their emergency preparedness plans to any emergency or disaster that may arise. Furthermore, we encourage hospitals that may be dealing with an internal emergency or disaster to maintain communication with external emergency preparedness entities and other facilities where appropriate. Comment: A few commenters were concerned that the proposed rule did not require planning for recovery of operations. The commenters recommended that CMS include requirements for facilities to plan for the return of normal operations after an emergency. A commenter recommended that CMS include requirements for provider preparedness in case of an PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 63865 information technology (IT) system failure. Response: We understand the commenter’s concerns and believe that facilities should consider planning for recovery of operations during the emergency or disaster response. Recovery of operations will require that facilities coordinate efforts with the relevant health department and emergency management agencies to restore facilities to their previous state prior to the emergency or disaster event. Our new emergency preparedness requirements focus on continuity of operations, not recovery of operations. Facilities can choose to include recovery of operations planning in their emergency preparedness plan, but we have not made recovery of operations planning a requirement. We refer commenters that are interested in recovery of operations planning to the following resources for more information: • National Disaster Recovery Framework (NDRF): https:// www.fema.gov/national-disasterrecovery-framework. • Continuity Guidance Circular 1 (CGC 1), and Continuity Guidance for Non-Federal Entities (States, Territories, Tribal, and Local Government Jurisdictions and Private Sector Organizations) http://www.fema.gov/ pdf/about/org/ncp/cont_guidance1.pdf. • National Preparedness System (https://www.fema.gov/nationalpreparedness-system) • Comprehensive Preparedness Guide 101 http://www.fema.gov/media-librarydata/20130726-1828-25045-0014/ cpg_101_comprehensive_preparedness_ guide_developing_and_maintaining _emergency_operations_ plans_2010.pdf) Comment: A commenter requested clarification on whether hospitals would have direct access to the Emergency System for Advance Registration of Volunteer Health Professionals (ESAR–VHP). A commenter recommended that CMS work with other federal agencies, including the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to expand ESAR–VHP and Medical Reserve Corps (MRC) team deployments to a 3 month rotation basis. The commenter also recommended that CMS purchase and pre-position Federal Reserve Inventories (FRI) at healthcare distributorships. Response: Hospitals do not have direct access to the Emergency System for Advance Registration of Volunteer Health Professional (ESAR–VHP). The Assistant Secretary for Preparedness E:\FR\FM\16SER2.SGM 16SER2 mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES2 63866 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 180 / Friday, September 16, 2016 / Rules and Regulations and Response (ASPR) manages the ESAR–VHP program. The program is administered on the state level. A hospital would request volunteer health professionals through State Emergency Management. For more information, reviewers may email ASPR at esarvhp@hhs.gov or visit the ESAR/VHP Web site: http://www.phe.gov/esarvhp/ pages/home.aspx. Volunteer deployments typically last for 2 weeks and are not extended without the agreement of the volunteer. In regards to the comment on the Federal Reserve Inventories, we believe that the commenter may be referring to the Strategic National Stockpile (SNS). The SNS program is a national repository of antibiotics, chemical antidotes, antitoxins, life-support medications, and medical supplies. It is not within CMS’ purview to purchase, administer, or maintain SNS stock. We refer commenters who have questions about the SNS program to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Web site at http:// emergency.cdc.gov/stockpile/index.asp. Comment: A commenter noted that CMS did not include emergency preparedness requirements for transport units (fire and rescue units, and ambulances). Furthermore, the commenter questioned whether a Certificate of Need (CON) is necessary during an emergency. Another commenter questioned why large single specialty and multispecialty medical groups are not discussed as included or excluded in this rule. The commenter noted that these entities have Medicare and Medicaid provider status; therefore, should be included in this rule. Another commenter questioned whether the proposed regulations would apply to residential drug and alcohol treatment centers. The commenter noted that if this is the case, it would be difficult for these centers to meet the proposed requirements due to lack of funding. Response: The emergency preparedness requirements only pertain to the 17 provider and supplier types discussed previously in this rule, which have existing CoPs or CfCs. These provider and supplier types do not include fire and rescue units, and ambulances, or single-specialty/multispecialty medical groups. Entities that work with hospitals or any of the other provider and supplier types covered by this regulation may have a role in the provider’s or supplier’s emergency preparedness plan, and providers or suppliers may choose to consider the role of these entities in their emergency preparedness plan. In addition, we note that CMS does not exercise regulatory VerDate Sep2014 19:01 Sep 15, 2016 Jkt 238001 authority over drug and alcohol treatment centers. In response to the question about a Certificate of Need, we note that facilities must formulate an emergency preparedness plan that complies with state and local laws. A Certificate of Need is a document that is needed in some states and local jurisdiction before the creation, acquisition, or expansion of a facility is allowed. Facilities should check with their state and local authorities in regards to Certificate of Need requirements. Comment: A commenter requested clarification on a facility’s responsibility to patients that have already evacuated the facility on their own. Response: Facilities are required to track the location of staff and patients in the facility’s care during an emergency. The facility is not required to track the location of patients who have voluntarily left on their own, since they are no longer in the facility’s care. However, if a patient voluntarily leaves a facility’s care during an emergency or a disaster, the facility may choose to inform the appropriate health department and emergency management or emergency medical services authorities if it believes the patient may be in danger. Comment: A commenter questioned whether the requirements take into account the role of the physician during emergency preparedness planning. The commenter questioned whether physicians will be required to provide feedback during the planning process, whether physicians would have a role in preserving patient medical documentation, whether physicians would be involved in determining arrangements for patients during a cessation of operations, and to what extent physicians would be required to participate in training and testing. Response: Individual physicians are not required, but are encouraged, to develop and maintain emergency preparedness plans. However, physicians that work in a facility that is required to develop and maintain an emergency preparedness plan can and are encouraged to provide feedback or suggestions for best practices. In addition, physicians that are employed by the facility and all new and existing staff must participate in emergency preparedness training and testing. We have not mandated a specific role for physicians during an emergency or disaster event, but we expect facilities to delineate responsibilities for all of their facility’s workers in their emergency preparedness plans and to determine the appropriate level of training for each professional role. PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 Comment: A commenter objected to use of the term ‘‘volunteers’’ in the proposed rule. The commenter stated that this term was not defined and recommended that the proposal be limited to healthcare professionals used to address surge needs during an emergency. Another commenter recommended that the regulation text should be revised to include the language, ‘‘Use of health care volunteers’’, to further clarify this distinction. Response: We provided information on the use of volunteers in the proposed rule (78 FR 79097), specifically with reference to the Medical Reserve Corps and the ESAR–VHP programs. Private citizens or medical professionals not employed by a hospital or facility often offer their voluntary services to hospitals or other entities during an emergency or disaster event. Therefore, we believe that facilities should have policies and procedures in place to address the use of volunteers in an emergency, among other emergency staffing strategies. We believe such policies should address, among other things, the process and role for integration of healthcare professionals that are locally-designated, such as the Medical Reserve Corps (https:// www.medicalreservecorps.gov/Home Page), or state-designated, such as Emergency System for Advance Registration of Volunteer Health Professional (ESAR–VHP), (http:// www.phe.gov/esarvhp/pages/ home.aspx) that have assisted in addressing surge needs during prior emergencies. As with previous emergencies, facilities may choose to utilize assistance from the MRC or through the state ESAR–VHP program. We believe the description of healthcare volunteers is already included in the current requirement and does not need to be further defined. Comment: A commenter questioned if the proposal will require facilities to plan for an electromagnetic event. The commenter noted that protecting against and treating patients after an electromagnetic event is costly. Another commenter recommended that the rule explicitly include and address the threats of fire, wildfires, tornados, and flooding. The commenter notes that these scenarios are not included in the National Planning Scenarios (NPS). Response: We expect facilities to develop an emergency preparedness plan that is based on a facility-based and community-based risk assessment using an ‘‘all-hazards’’ approach. If a provider or supplier determines that its facility or community is at risk for an E:\FR\FM\16SER2.SGM 16SER2 mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES2 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 180 / Friday, September 16, 2016 / Rules and Regulations electromagnetic event or natural disasters, such as fires, wildfires, tornados, and flooding, the provider or supplier can choose to incorporate planning for such an event into its emergency preparedness plan. We note that compliance with these requirements, including a determination of whether the provider or supplier based its emergency preparedness plan on facility-based and community-based risk assessments using an all-hazards approach, will be assessed through onsite surveys by CMS, State Survey Agencies, or Accreditation Organizations with CMS-approved accreditation programs. Comment: A few commenters had recommendations for the structure and organization of the proposed rule. A commenter recommended that CMS specify the 17 providers and supplier types to which the rule would apply in the first part of the rule, so that facilities could verify whether or not the regulations would apply to them. A few commenters suggested that the requirements of the proposed rule should not be included in the CoPs, but instead comprise a separate regulatory chapter specific to emergency preparedness. Response: We included a list of the provider and supplier types affected by the emergency preparedness requirements in the proposed rule’s Table of Contents (78 FR 79083 through 79084) and in the preamble text 78 FR 79090. Thus, we believe that we clearly listed the affected providers and suppliers at the very beginning of the proposed rule. We also believe the emergency preparedness requirements should be included in the CoPs for providers, the CfCs for suppliers, and requirements for LTC facilities. These CoPs, CfCs, and requirements for LTC facilities are intended to protect public health and safety and ensure that high quality care is provided to all persons. Facilities must meet their respective CoPs, CfCs, or requirements in order to participate in the Medicare and Medicaid programs. We are able to enforce and monitor compliance with the CoPs, CfCs, and requirements for LTC facilities through the survey process. Therefore, we believe that the emergency preparedness requirements are included in the most appropriate regulatory chapters. Comment: A few commenters suggested additional citations for the proposed rule, recommended that we include specific reference material, and suggested edits to the preamble language. A commenter stated that we omitted some references in the preamble discussion of the proposed rule. The VerDate Sep2014 19:01 Sep 15, 2016 Jkt 238001 commenter noted that while we included references to HSPD 5, 21, and 8 in the proposed rule, the commenter recommended that all of the HSPDs should have been included. Furthermore, the commenter noted that HSPD 7 in particular, which does not provide a specific role for HHS, should have been referenced since it includes discussion of critical infrastructure protection and the role it plays in allhazards mitigation. A commenter suggested that we add the following text to section II.B.1.a. of the proposed rule (78 FR 79085): ‘‘HSPD–21 tasked the establishment of the National Center for Disaster Medicine and Public Health (http:// ncdmph.usuhs.edu) as an academic center of excellence at the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences to lead federal efforts in developing and propagating core curricula, training, and research in disaster health.’’ A commenter recommended that we include the Joint Guidelines for Care of Children in the Emergency Department, developed by the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American College of Emergency Physicians, and the Emergency Nurses Association, as a resource for the final rule. A commenter suggested the addition of the phrase ‘‘private critical infrastructure’’ to the following statement on page 79086 of the proposed rule: ‘‘The Stafford Act authorizes the President to provide financial and other assistance to state and local governments, certain private nonprofit organizations, and individuals to support response, recovery, and mitigation efforts.’’ A commenter included several articles and referenced documentation on emergency preparedness and proper management and disposal of medical waste materials, while another recommended that CMS reference specific FEMA reference documents. Another commenter referred CMS to the Comprehensive Preparedness Guidelines 101 Template, although the commenter did not specify the source of this template. Response: We thank the commenters for their recommended edits throughout the document. The editorial suggestions are appreciated and noted. We also want to thank commenters for their recommendations for additional resources on emergency preparedness. We provided an extensive list of resources in the proposed and have included links to various resources in this final rule that facilities can use as resources during the development of their emergency preparedness plans. PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 63867 However, we note that these lists are not comprehensive, since we intend to allow facilities flexibility as they implement the emergency preparedness requirements. We encourage facilities to use any resources that they find helpful as they implement the emergency preparedness requirements. Omissions from the list of resources set out in the proposed rule do not indicate any intention on our part to exclude other resources from use by facilities. Comment: A commenter stated that the local emergency management and public health authorities are the bestplaced entities to coordinate their communities’ disaster preparedness and response, collaborating with hospitals as instrumental partners in this effort. Response: We stated in the proposed rule that local emergency management and public health authorities play a very important role in coordinating their community’s disaster preparedness and response activities. We proposed that each hospital develop an emergency plan that includes a process for ensuring cooperation and collaboration with local, tribal, regional, state and federal emergency preparedness officials’ efforts to ensure an integrated response during a disaster or emergency situation. We also proposed that hospitals participate in community mock disaster drills. As noted in the proposed rule, we believe that community-wide coordination during a disaster is vital to a community’s ability to maintain continuity of healthcare for the patient population during and after a disaster or emergency. Comment: A few commenters were concerned about the exclusion of specific requirements to account for the health and safety of healthcare workers. A commenter, in reference to pediatric healthcare, recommended that we consider adding a behavioral healthcare provision to the emergency preparedness requirements, which would account for the professional selfcare needs of healthcare providers. Another commenter suggested that we change the language on page 79092 of the proposed rule to include 5 phases of emergency management, with the addition of the phrase ‘‘protection of the safety and security of occupants in the facility.’’ Another commenter recommended that we include occupational health and safety elements in the four proposed emergency preparedness standards. Furthermore, the commenter recommended that we consult with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), and the Worker Education and Training Program E:\FR\FM\16SER2.SGM 16SER2 63868 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 180 / Friday, September 16, 2016 / Rules and Regulations mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES2 of the National Institute for Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) for more information on integrating worker health and safety protections into emergency planning. Response: While we believe that providers should prioritize the health and safety of their healthcare workers during an emergency, we do not believe that it is appropriate to include detailed requirements within this regulation. As we have previously stated, the regulation is not intended to be overly prescriptive. Therefore, providers have the discretion to establish policies and procedures in their emergency preparedness plans that meet the minimum requirements in this regulation and that are tailored to the specific needs and circumstances of the facility. We note that providers should continue to comply with pertinent federal, state, or local laws regarding the protection of healthcare workers in the workplace. While it is not within the scope of this rule to address OSHA, NIOSH, or NIEHS work place regulations, we encourage providers and suppliers to consider developing policies and procedures to protect healthcare workers during an emergency. We refer readers to the following list of resources to aid providers and suppliers in the formulation of such policies and procedures: • https://www.osha.gov/SLTC/ emergencypreparedness/ • http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/ emergency.html • http://www.niehs.nih.gov/health/ topics/population/occupational/ index.cfm Comment: A few commenters noted that while section 1135 of the Act waives certain Conditions of Participation (CoPs) during a public health emergency, there is no authority to waive the Conditions for Payment (CfPs). The commenters recommended that the Secretary thoroughly review the requirements under the CoPs and the CfPs and seek authority from Congress to waive additional requirements under the CfPs that are burdensome and that affect timely access to care during emergencies. Response: While we appreciate the concerns of the commenters, these comments are outside the scope of this rule. 1. Integrated Health Systems In the proposed rule, we proposed that for each separately certified healthcare facility to have an emergency preparedness program that includes an emergency plan, based on a risk VerDate Sep2014 19:01 Sep 15, 2016 Jkt 238001 assessment that utilizes an all hazards approach, policies and procedures, a communication plan, and a training program. Comment: We received a few comments that suggested we allow integrated health systems to have one coordinated emergency preparedness program for the entire system. Commenters explained that an integrated health system could be comprised of two nearby hospitals, a LTC facility, a HHA, and a hospice. The commenters stated that under our proposed regulation, each entity would need to develop an individual emergency preparedness program in order to be in compliance. Commenters proposed that we allow for the development of one universal emergency preparedness program that encompasses one community-based risk assessment, separate facility-based risk assessments, integrated policies and procedures that meet the requirements for each facility, and coordinated communication plans, training and testing. They noted that allowing for a coordinated emergency preparedness program would ultimately reduce the burden placed on the individual facilities and provide for a more coordinated response during an emergency. Response: We appreciate the comments received on this issue. We agree that allowing integrated health systems to have a coordinated emergency preparedness program is in the best interest of the facilities and patients that comprise a health system. Therefore, we are revising the proposed requirements by adding a separate standard to the provisions applicable to each provider and supplier type. This separate standard will allow any separately certified healthcare facility that operates within a healthcare system to elect to be a part of the healthcare system’s unified emergency preparedness program. If a healthcare system elects to have a unified emergency preparedness program, this integrated program must demonstrate that each separately certified facility within the system actively participated in the development of the program. In addition, each separately certified facility must be capable of demonstrating that they can effectively implement the emergency preparedness program and demonstrate compliance with its requirements at the facility level. As always, each facility will be surveyed individually and will need to demonstrate compliance. Therefore, the unified program will also need to be developed and maintained in a manner PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 that takes into account the unique circumstances, patient populations, and services offered for each facility within the system. For example, for a unified plan covering both a hospital and a LTC facility, the emergency plan must account for the residents in the LTC facility as well as those patients within a hospital, while taking into consideration the difference in services that are provided at a LTC facility and a hospital. In addition, the healthcare system will need to take into account the resources each facility within the system has and any state laws that the facility must adhere to. The unified emergency preparedness program must also include a documented community– based risk assessment and an individual facility-based risk assessment for each separately certified facility within the health system, both utilizing an allhazards approach. The unified program must also include integrated policies and procedures that meet the emergency preparedness requirements specific to each provider type as set forth in their individual set of regulations. Lastly, the unified program must have a coordinated communication plan and training and testing program. We believe that this approach will allow a healthcare system to spread the cost associated with training and offer a financial advantage to each of the facilities within a system. In addition, we believe that, in some cases this approach will provide flexibility and could potentially result in a more coordinated response during an emergency that will enable a more successful outcome. 2. Requests for Technical Assistance and Funding The December 2013 proposed rule included an appendix of the numerous resources and documents used to develop the proposed rule. Specifically, the appendix to the proposed rule included helpful reports, toolkits, and samples from multiple government agencies such as ASPR, the CDC, FEMA, HRSA, AHRQ, and the Institute of Medicine (See Appendix A, 78 FR 79198). In response to our proposed rule, we received numerous comments requesting that we provide facilities with increased funding and technical assistance to implement our proposed regulations. Comment: A few commenters appreciated the resources that we provided in the proposed rule, but expressed concerns that, despite the resources referenced in the regulation, busy and resource-constrained facilities will not have a simple and organized way to access technical assistance and E:\FR\FM\16SER2.SGM 16SER2 mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES2 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 180 / Friday, September 16, 2016 / Rules and Regulations other valuable information in order to comply with the proposed requirements. Commenters indicated that despite the success of healthcare coalitions, they have not been established in every region. Commenters suggested that formal technical assistance should be available to facilities to help them successfully implement their emergency preparedness requirements. A commenter recommended that ASPR should lead this effort given its expertise in emergency preparedness planning and its charge to lead the nation in preventing, preparing for, and responding to the adverse health effects of public health emergencies. Another commenter suggested that we consider hosting regional meetings for facilities to share information and resources and that we provide region specific resources on our Web site. Commenters encouraged CMS to promote collaborative planning among facilities and provide the support needed for facilities to leverage each other’s resources. These commenters believe that networks of facilities will be in a better position than governmental resources to identify cost and time saving efficiencies, but need support from CMS to coordinate their efforts. Response: We appreciate the feedback from commenters and understand how valuable guidance and resources will be to providers and suppliers in order to comply with this regulation. We do not anticipate providing formal technical assistance, such as CMS-led trainings, to providers and suppliers. Instead, as with all of our regulations, we will release interpretive guidance for this regulation that will aid facilities in implementing these regulations and provide information regarding best practices. We strongly encourage facilities to review the interpretative guidance from us, use the guidance to identify best practices, and then network with other facilities to develop strategic plans. Providers and suppliers impacted by this regulation should collaborate and leverage resources in developing emergency preparedness programs to identify cost and time saving efficiencies. We note that in this final rule we have revised the proposed requirements to allow integrated health systems to elect to have one unified emergency preparedness program (see Section II.A.1.Intergrated Health Systems for a detailed discussion of the requirement). We believe that collaborative planning will not only leverage the financial burden on facilities, but also result in a more coordinated response to an emergency event. VerDate Sep2014 19:01 Sep 15, 2016 Jkt 238001 In addition, we note that in the proposed rule, we indicated numerous resources related to emergency preparedness, including helpful reports, toolkits, and samples from ASPR, the CDC, FEMA, HRSA, AHRQ, and the Institute of Medicine (See Appendix A, 78 FR 79198). Providers and suppliers should use these many resources as templates and the framework for getting their emergency preparedness programs started. We also refer readers to SAMHSA’s Disaster Technical Assistance Center (DTAC) for more information on delivering an effective mental health and substance abuse (behavioral health) response to disasters at http://www.samhsa.gov/dtac/. Finally we note that ASPR, as a leader in healthcare system preparedness, developed and launched the Technical Resources, Assistance Center, and Information Exchange (TRACIE). TRACIE is designed to provide resources and technical assistance to healthcare system preparedness stakeholders in building a resilient healthcare system. There are numerous products and resources located within the TRACIE Web site that target specific provider types affected by this rule. While TRACIE does not focus specifically on the requirements implemented in this regulation, this is a valuable resource to aid a wide spectrum of partners with their health system emergency preparedness activities. We strongly encourage providers and suppliers to utilize TRACIE and leverage the information provided by ASPR. Comment: Some commenters noted that their region is currently experiencing a reduction in the federal funding they receive through the HPP. These commenters stated that the HPP program has proven to be successful and encouraged healthcare entities impacted by this regulation to engage their state HPP for technical assistance and training while developing their emergency preparedness programs. Commenters shared that HPP staff have established trusting and fundamental relationships with facilities, associations, and emergency managers throughout their state. Commenters expressed that while the program has been instrumental in supporting their state’s healthcare emergency response, it does not make sense to impose these new emergency preparedness regulations while financial resources through the HPP are diminishing. Commenters stressed that the HPP program alone cannot support the rollout of these new regulations and emphasized that a strong and wellfunded HHP program is needed to PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 63869 contribute to the successful implementation of these new requirements. Commenters also suggested that CMS offer training to the states’ HPP programs, so that these agencies can remain in a central leadership role within their states. Response: We appreciate the feedback and agree that the HPP program has been a fundamental resource for developing healthcare emergency preparedness programs. While we recognize that HPP funding is limited, we want to emphasize that the HPP program is not intended to solely fund a facility’s individual emergency preparedness program and activities. Despite the limited financial resources, healthcare facilities should continue to engage their healthcare coalitions and state HPP coordinators for training and guidance. We encourage healthcare facilities, particularly those in neighboring geographic areas, to collaborate and build relationships that will allow facilities to share and leverage resources. Comment: A few commenters noted that, while these new emergency preparedness regulations should be put in place to protect vulnerable communities, there should also be incentives to help facilities meet these new standards. Many commenters expressed concerns about the decrease in funding available to state and local governments. Most commenters recommended that grant funding and loan programs be provided to support hiring staff to develop or modify emergency plans. However, a few commenters suggested that federal funding should be allocated to the nation’s most vulnerable counties. These commenters believe that special federal funding consideration should not be provided to all, but rather should be given to those counties and cities with a uniquely dense population. A commenter believed that incentives should be put in place to reward those facilities that are found compliant with the new standards. In addition, several commenters requested that CMS provide additional Medicare payment to providers and suppliers for implementing these emergency preparedness requirements. Response: We currently expect facilities to have and develop policies and procedures for patient care and the overall operations. The emergency preparedness requirement may increase costs in the short term because resources will have to be devoted to the assessment and development of an emergency plan utilizing an all-hazards approach. While the requirements could result in some immediate costs to a E:\FR\FM\16SER2.SGM 16SER2 63870 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 180 / Friday, September 16, 2016 / Rules and Regulations provider or supplier, we believe that developing an emergency preparedness program will overall be beneficial to any provider or supplier. In addition, planning for the protection and care of patients, clients, residents, and staff during an emergency or a disaster is a good business practice. As we have previously noted, CMS has the authority to create and modify health and safety CoPs, which establish the requirements that a provider must meet in order to participate in the Medicare or Medicaid programs. mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES2 3. Requirement To Track Patients and Staff In the proposed rule, we requested comments on the feasibility of tracking staff and patients in outpatient facilities. Comment: Overall commenters agreed that there is not a crucial need for outpatient facilities to track their patients as compared to inpatient facilities. Commenters noted that outpatient providers and suppliers would most likely close their facilities prior to or immediately after an emergency, sending staff and patients home. We did not propose the tracking requirement for transplant centers, CORFs, Clinics, Rehabilitation Agencies, and Public Health Agencies as Providers of Outpatient Physical Therapy and Speech-Language Pathology Services, and RHCs/FQHCs. For OPOs we proposed that they would only need to track staff. We stated that transplant centers’ patients and OPOs’ potential donors would be in hospitals, and thus, would be the hospital’s responsibility. Response: We agree with the majority of commenters and continue to believe that it is impractical for outpatient providers and suppliers to track patients and staff during and after an emergency. In the event of an emergency outpatient providers and suppliers will have the flexibility to cancel appointments and close their facilities. Therefore, we are finalizing the rule as proposed. Specifically, we do not require transplant centers, RHCs/FQHCs, CORFs, Clinics, Rehabilitation Agencies, and Public Health Agencies as providers of Outpatient Physical Therapy and Speech-Language Pathology Services to track their patients and staffs. We are also finalizing our proposal for OPOs to track staff only both during and after an emergency. A detailed discussion of comments specific to OPOs tracking staff can be found in section II.Q. of this final rule (Emergency Preparedness Regulations for Organ Procurement Organizations). VerDate Sep2014 19:01 Sep 15, 2016 Jkt 238001 Comment: In addition to the feedback we received on whether we should require outpatient providers and suppliers to track their patients and staff, we also received varying comments in regards to the providers and suppliers that we did propose to meet the tracking requirement.Commenters supported the proposal for certain providers and suppliers to track staff and patients, and agreed that a system is needed. Some understood that the information about staff and patient location would be needed during an emergency, but stated that it would be burdensome and often unrealistic to expect providers and suppliers to locate individuals after an emergency event. Some commenters noted that patients at a receiving facility would be the responsibility of the receiving facility. Some commenters stated that tracking of patients going home is not their responsibility, or would be difficult to achieve. A commenter believed that tracking of staff would be a violation of staff’s privacy. A commenter stated that in their large facility, only the ‘‘staff on duty’’ at the time of the emergency would be in their staffing system. Some commenters stated that staff would be difficult to track because some facilities have hundreds or thousands of employees, and some staff may have left to be with their families. Some commenters suggested that CMS promote the use of voluntary registries to help track their outpatient populations and encouraged coordination of these registries among facility types. A few commenters stated that one of the tools discussed in the preamble for tracking patients; namely, The Joint Patient Assessment and Tracking System (JPATS) was only available for hospitals and did not include other providers such as LTC facilities, and several stated the system is incompatible with their IT systems. Response: For RNHCIs, PRTFs, PACE organizations, LTC facilities, ICFs/IID, hospitals, and CAHs, we proposed that these providers develop policies and procedures regarding a system to track the location of staff and patients in the hospital’s care both during and after an emergency. Despite providing services on an outpatient basis, we also proposed to require hospices, HHAs, and ESRD facilities to assume this responsibility because these providers and suppliers would be required to provide continuing patient care during an emergency. We also proposed the tracking requirement for ASCs because we believed an ASC would maintain PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 responsibility for their staff and patients if patients were in the facility. After carefully analyzing the issues raised by commenters regarding the process to track staff and patients during and after an emergency, we agree with the commenters that our proposed requirements could be unnecessarily burdensome. We are revising the tracking requirements based on the type of facility. For CAHs, Hospitals, and RNHCIs we are removing the proposed requirement for tracking after an emergency. Instead, in this final rule we require that these facilities must document the specific name and location of the receiving facility or other location for patients who leave the facility during the emergency. We would expect facilities to track their onduty staff and sheltered patients during an emergency and indicate where a patient is relocated to during an emergency (that is, to another facility, home, or alternate means of shelter, etc.). Also, since providers and suppliers are required to conduct a risk assessment and develop strategies for addressing emergency events identified by the risk assessment, we would expect the facility to include in its emergency plan a method for contacting off-duty staff during an emergency and procedures to address other contingencies in the event staff are not able to report to duty which may include but are not limited to staff from other facilities and state or federallydesignated health professionals. For PRTFs, LTC facilities, ICF/IIDs, PACE organizations, CMHCs, and ESRD facilities we are finalizing as proposed the requirement to track staff and patients both during and after an emergency. We have clarified that the requirement applies to tracking on-duty staff and sheltered patients. Furthermore, we clarify that if on-duty staff and sheltered patients are relocated during the emergency, the provider or supplier must document the specific name and location of the receiving facility or other location. Unlike inpatient facilities, PRTFs, ICF/IIDs, and LTC facilities are residential facilities and serve as the patient’s home, which is why in these settings we refer to the patients as ‘‘residents.’’ Similar to these residential facilities ESRD facilities, CMHCs, and PACE organizations, provide a continuum of care for their patients. Residents and patients of these facilities would anticipate returning to these facilities after an emergency. For this reason, we believe that it is imperative for these facilities to know where their residents/patients and staff are located during and after the E:\FR\FM\16SER2.SGM 16SER2 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 180 / Friday, September 16, 2016 / Rules and Regulations mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES2 emergency to allow for repatriation and the continuation of regularly scheduled appointments. While we pointed out JPATS as a tool for providers and suppliers, we note that we indicated that we were not proposing a specific type of tracking system that providers and suppliers must use. We also indicated that in the proposed rule that a number of states have tracking systems in place or under development and the systems are available for use by healthcare providers and suppliers. We encourage providers and suppliers to leverage the support and resources available to them through local and national healthcare systems, healthcare coalitions, and healthcare organizations for resources and tools for tracking patients. We have also reviewed our proposal to require ASCs, hospices, and HHAs to track their staff and patients before and after an emergency. We discuss in detail the comments we received specific to these providers and suppliers and revisions to their proposed tracking requirement in their specific section later in this final rule. B. Implementation Date We proposed several variations on an implementation date for the emergency preparedness requirements (78 FR 79179). Regarding the implementation date, we requested information on the following issues: • A targeted approach to emergency preparedness that would apply the rule to one provider or supplier type or a subset of provider types, to learn from implementation prior to requiring compliance for all 17 types of providers and suppliers. • A phased-in approach that would implement the requirements over a longer time horizon, or differential time horizons for the different provider and supplier types. Comment: Most commenters recommended that CMS set a later implementation date for the emergency preparedness requirements. Some commenters recommended that we use a targeted approach, whereby the rule would be implemented first by one provider/supplier type or a subset of provider/supplier types, with later implementation by other provider/ supplier types, so they can learn from prior implementation at other facilities. Others recommended that CMS phase in the requirements over a longer time horizon. Many commenters recommended that CMS require implementation at hospitals or LTC facilities first, so that other facilities could benefit from the experience and lessons learned by these VerDate Sep2014 19:01 Sep 15, 2016 Jkt 238001 providers. Some of these commenters stated that these providers have the most capacity to implement these requirements. A commenter recommended that hospitals implement the requirements of the rule first, followed by CAHs and other inpatient provider types and LTC facilities. Other provider and supplier types would follow thereafter. The commenter recommended that CMS establish a period of non-enforcement for each implementation phase, while a Phase 1 evaluation is conducted and feedback is given to other facilities. Several commenters, including major hospital associations, disagreed with CMS’ proposal to implement all of the requirements 1 year after the final rule is published. The commenters noted that implementation of all the requirements after 1 year would be burdensome and costly to many facilities. In addition, a few commenters noted that certain facilities, mainly rural and small facilities, may be at a disadvantage because they have not participated in national emergency preparedness planning efforts or because they lack the necessary resources to implement emergency preparedness plans. A few commenters drew a distinction between accredited and non-accredited facilities and recommended that hospitals implement the requirements within a year or 2 after publication of the final rule. Some of the commenters noted that non-accredited facilities, CAHs, HHAs, and hospices, would need more time. Several of these commenters also stated that hospitals that need more time for implementation should be able to propose to CMS a reasonable period of time to comply. A few commenters stated that the emergency preparedness proposal is unlike the standards utilized by the TJC and that enforcement of these requirements should be at a later date for both accredited and non-accredited facilities. Some commenters recommended that CMS give ASCs and FQHCs additional time to come into compliance. A commenter recommended that CMS set a later implementation date for the requirements and provide a flexible implementation timeframe based on provider type and resources. A few commenters stated that the implementation timeline is too short for rehabilitation facilities, long-term acute care facilities, LTC facilities, behavioral health inpatient facilities, and ICF/IIDs. A few commenters recommended that CMS phase-in implementation on a standard-by-standard basis. A commenter recommended that LTC facilities implement the requirements 12 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 63871 to 18 months after hospitals. Furthermore, the commenter recommended an 18 to 24 month phasein of emergency systems and a 24 to 38 month phase-in for the training and testing requirements. Another commenter recommended that facilities be allowed to comply with the initial planning requirements within 2 years, and then be allowed to comply with the subsistence and infrastructure requirements in years 3 and 4. The commenters varied in their recommendations on the timeframe CMS should use for the implementation date. These recommendations ranged from 6 months to 5 years, with a few commenters recommending even longer periods. Some commenters noted that applying a targeted approach, covering one or a subset of provider classes to learn from implementation prior to extending the rule to all groups, would also allow a longer period of time for other provider/supplier types to prepare for implementation. Furthermore, a commenter noted that a phased in approach would help to alleviate the cost burden on facilities that would need to create an emergency plan and train and test staff. Response: We appreciate the commenters’ feedback. We considered a phased-in approach in a number of ways. We looked at phasing in the implementation of various providers and suppliers; and phasing in the various standards of the regulation. We concluded that this approach would be too difficult to implement, enforce, and evaluate. Also, this would not allow communities to have a comprehensive approach to emergency preparedness. However, we agree that there should be a later implementation date for the emergency preparedness requirements. However, we do not believe that a targeted or phased-in approach to implementation is appropriate. One thing we proposed and are now finalizing to address this concern is extending the implementation timeframe for the requirements to 1 year after the effective date of this final rule (see section section II, Provisions of the Proposed Rule and Responses to Public Comments, part B, Implementation Date). We believe it is imperative that each provider thinks in terms broader than their own facility, and plan for how they would serve similar and other healthcare facilities as well as the whole community during and surrounding an emergency event. To encourage providers to develop a comprehensive and coordinated approach to emergency preparedness, all providers need to adopt the requirements in this final rule at the same time. E:\FR\FM\16SER2.SGM 16SER2 mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES2 63872 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 180 / Friday, September 16, 2016 / Rules and Regulations Commenters have stated that hospitals that are TJC-accredited are part of the Hospital Preparedness Program (HPP) program, and those hospitals that follow National Fire Protection Association (NFPA®) standards, have already established most of the emergency preparedness requirements set out in this rule. Based on CDC’s National Health Statistics Reports; Number 37, March 24, 2011, page 2 (NCHS–2008PanFluand EP_NHAMCSSurveyReport_2011.pdf), about 67.9 percent of hospitals had plans for all six hazards (epidemicpandemic, biological, chemical, nuclearradiological, explosive-incendiary, and natural incidents). Nearly all hospitals (99.0 percent) had emergency response plans that specifically addressed chemical accidents or attacks, which were not significantly different from the prevalence of plans for natural disasters (97.8 percent), epidemics or pandemics (94.1 percent), and biological accidents or attacks. However, we also believe that other facilities will be ready to begin implementation of these rules at the same time as hospitals. We believe that most facilities already have some basic emergency preparedness requirements that can be built upon to meet the requirements set out in this final rule. We note that we have modified or eliminated some of our proposed requirements for certain providers and suppliers, as discussed later in this final rule, which should ease concerns about implementation. Therefore, we believe that all affected providers and suppliers will be able to comply with these requirements 1 year after the final rule is published. We do not believe a period of nonenforcement is appropriate as it will further prolong the implementation of necessary and life-saving emergency preparedness planning requirements by facilities. A later implementation date will leave the most vulnerable patient populations and unprepared facilities without a valuable, life-saving emergency preparedness plan should an emergency arise. We have not received comments that persuaded us that a later implementation date for these requirements of more than 1 year is beneficial or appropriate for providers and suppliers or their patients. In response to commenters that opposed our proposal to implement the requirements 1 year after the final rule was published and recommended that we afford facilities more time to implement the requirements, we do not believe that the requirements will be overly burdensome or overly costly to providers and suppliers. We note, as we have heard from many commenters, that VerDate Sep2014 19:01 Sep 15, 2016 Jkt 238001 many facilities already have established emergency preparedness plans, as required by accrediting organizations. However, we acknowledge that there may be a significant amount of work that small facilities and those with limited resources will need to undertake to establish an emergency preparedness plan that conforms to the requirements set out in this regulation. However, we believe that prolonging the requirements in this final rule by 1 year will provide sufficient time for implementation among the various facilities to meet the emergency preparedness requirements. We encourage facilities to engage and collaborate with their local partners and healthcare coalitions in their area for assistance. Facilities may also access ASPR’s TRACIE web portal, which is a healthcare emergency preparedness information gateway that helps stakeholders at the federal, state, local, tribal, non-profit, and for-profit levels have access to information and resources to improve preparedness, response, recovery, and mitigation efforts. ASPR TRACIE, located at: https://asprtracie.hhs.gov/, is an excellent resource for the various CMS providers and suppliers as they seek to implement the enhanced emergency preparedness requirements. We encourage facilities to engage and collaborate with their local partners and healthcare coalitions in their area for technical assistance as they include local experts and can provide regional information that can inform the requirements as set forth. Comment: Some commenters recommended that CMS implement all of the emergency preparedness requirements 1 year after the final rule is published. Other commenters recommended that CMS implement the requirements as soon as the final rule is published or set an implementation date that is less than 1 year from the effective date of this final rule. A few of these commenters, including a major beneficiary advocacy group, stated that implementation should begin as soon as practicable, or immediately after the final rule is published and cautioned against a later implementation date that may leave facilities without important emergency preparedness plans during an emergency. Some of these commenters stated that hospitals in particular already have emergency preparedness plans in place and are well equipped and prepared to implement the requirements set out in these regulations over the course of a year. Some commenters noted that most hospitals are fully aware of the 4 emergency preparedness requirements set out in the proposed rule through PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 current accreditation standards. Furthermore, the commenters noted that these four requirements would not impose any additional burdens on hospitals. A few commenters acknowledged that some hospitals are not under the purview of an accrediting agency and therefore may need up to 1 year to implement the requirements. Response: We appreciate the commenters’ feedback. We agree with the commenters’ view that implementation of the requirements should occur 1 year after the final rule is published for all 17 types of providers and suppliers. We believe that an implementation date for these requirements that is 1 year after the effective date of this final rule will allow all facilities to develop an emergency preparedness plan that meets all of the requirements set out within these regulations. While we understand why some commenters would want these requirements to be implemented shortly after publication of the final rule, we also understand some commenters’ concerns about that timeframe. We believe that facilities will need a period of time after the final rule is published to plan, develop, and implement the emergency preparedness requirements in the final rule. Accordingly, we believe that 1 year is a sufficient amount of time for facilities to meet these requirements. Comment: A few commenters recommended that CMS include a provision that would allow facilities to apply for additional time extensions or waivers for implementation. A commenter recommended that CMS allow facilities to rely on their existing policies if the facility can demonstrate that the existing policies align with the emergency preparedness plan requirements and achieve a similar outcome. Response: We do not agree with including a provision that will allow for facilities to apply for extensions or waivers to the emergency preparedness requirements. We believe that an implementation date that is beyond 1 year after the effective date of this final rule for these requirements is inappropriate and leaves the most vulnerable facilities and patient populations without life-saving emergency preparedness plans. However, we do understand that some facilities, especially smaller and more rural facilities, may experience difficulties developing their emergency preparedness plans. Therefore, we believe that setting an implementation date of 1 year after the effective date of this final rule for these requirements will give these and other facilities E:\FR\FM\16SER2.SGM 16SER2 mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES2 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 180 / Friday, September 16, 2016 / Rules and Regulations sufficient time for compliance. As stated earlier, we encourage facilities to form coalitions in their area for assistance in meeting these requirements. We also encourage facilities to utilize the many resources we have included in the proposed and final rule. We appreciate that some facilities have existing emergency preparedness plans. However, all facilities will be required to develop and maintain an emergency preparedness plan based on an all-hazards approach and address the four major elements of emergency preparedness in their plan that we have identified in this final rule. Each facility will be required to evaluate its current emergency preparedness plan and activities to ensure that it complies with the new requirements. Comment: A few commenters recommended that CMS implement enforcement of the final rule when the interpretive guidance (IG) is finalized by CMS. A few commenters noted that this implementation data should include a period of engagement with hospitals and other providers and suppliers, a period to allow for the development and testing of surveyor tools, and a readiness review of state survey agencies that is complete and publicly available. A commenter recommended that facilities implement the requirements 5 years after the IGs have been published. Another commenter recommended that CMS phase-in implementation in terms of enforcement and roll out, allowing time for full implementation and assistance to facilities and state surveyors. A few commenters recommended that providers be allowed a period of time where they are held harmless during a transitional planning period, where providers may be allotted more time to plan and implement the emergency preparedness requirements. Response: We disagree with the…
Purchase answer to see full attachment

Discuss the process of health policymaking

Discuss the process of health policymaking

select any (proposed or enacted) public health policy. In two or three paragraphs discuss a few of the dimensions of the policymaking process as they relate to your chosen policy. In addition, I would like you to address specifically the roles of both ethics and evidence in the process. (Be sure to select a “public” health policy and not one enacted by a private organization. For example, one legislated by the US Congress, the FDA, CDC, HHS, CMS, etc.)

I chose New York’s recently changed abortion law. Here is my essay below.

The New York state Department stated that “maternal mortality rate has increased in the last decade from 13.3 per 100,000 live births in 2006, to 25 per 100,000 live births in 2015.” The vast majority of these deaths were caused by abortions that were done illegally in unsafe conditions. [a1] The alarming increase has prompted the Governor of New York to look closer into this epidemic and the concerning rise in the statistical numbers. One way to combat the rise in maternal mortality rate, the Governor enacted a new abortion law, that allowed mothers to have legal and safe abortions past the 24-week mark; if the mother and or infant’s health is at risk. [a2] This is a way for those parents who find out later in their pregnancy, that the child may not be viable and or has a birth defect that hinders the parent and or child emotionally, they will have the proper and safe channels to terminate the pregnancy.

This new law was adopted, but with hesitation and a large amount of push back. NYCLU Executive Director Donna Lieberman stated “Today, New York State took a historic vote to protect women’s rights and autonomy. The Reproductive Health Act recognizes reproductive health care as a fundamental right. It takes abortion out of the criminal code and puts it where women’s health belongs — in the public health law. It recognizes the range of medical professionals that women can turn to, expanding access to early care.” This was a phenomenal win for those who have advocated for women’s rights. The uphill battle has given women more control over their reproductive choice. In contrast, if a woman is attacked by an assailant and lose the baby as a result, the perpetrator wouldn’t be criminalized for the death of the child, because the death of an unborn child has been removed from the criminal penal code. Another issue that arises from this new policy is the Hippocratic oath, this oath states “do no harm”, it is one oath that many doctors, physicians and nurses take as they begin their career as caretakers. If a woman wants a late term abortion even though the mother and child are healthy and viable, but the mother feels as if she has a health issue that may hinder her from providing for the child, would the doctor be held liable for harming a child who is able to live outside the womb?

Although on the surface, this new policy shows great potential and progression, there are a lot of underlying factors that may arise and cause it to fail. This new policy is so new that we have yet to see the ramifications of its implementation, therefor we are unable to assess whether or not it was a good decision. Ruth Ginsbrg said “ the emphasis must be no on the right to abortion but on the right to privacy and reproductive control.”, and that exactly what this law is trying to do.


Grading Rubric

A specific health policy or program was selected and details provided (10pts possible): 10 points received

Were at least 2 dimensions of the policymaking process identified (20pts possible): 0 points received

Was it made clear how these aspects of the policymaking process were related to the chosen policy (10pts possible): 0 points received

Was the role of ethics discussed in relation to the policymaking process for this health policy/program with some specificity (5pts possible): 0 points received

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

Was the role of evidence discussed in relation to the policymaking process for this health policy/program with some specificity (5pts possible): 0 points received

Comments: Here are his recommendations to fix it.

Very nicely written and you picked a policy with potential. However, the point of this exercise was to objectively “discuss a few of the dimensions of the policymaking processes they relate to your chosen policy.” These were covered in the video lecture. In the future, please carefully read the instructions because all exercises and exams will be graded similarly.

You lost a lot of points since what you wrote wasn’t focused on the policymaking process. However, for this first assignment I am letting students go back and make changes/additions to their submissions if they did poorly. Please email me your updated document by the end of February if you would like me to re-grade this exercise without any penalty.

HCM 481 CSU Global Challenges for Hospitals in Strategic Planning

HCM 481 CSU Global Challenges for Hospitals in Strategic Planning

 

Scenario: You are the Director of Planning of a mid-size hospital in a suburban market. As the organization continues to move forward and prepare for its annual strategic planning retreat, the CEO has asked you to create a “white paper” (similar to a short research paper) that explains “best practices” in strategic planning. He has asked you to identify the top three challenges that healthcare organizations encounter in the planning process and to identify one method or technique for each challenge that other organizations have used to successfully address these challenges.

The “White Paper” should be well-written and meet the following requirements:

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

  • 2 pages (single-spaced) in length
  • Include at least three current references from the peer-reviewed articles
  • Reference list is expected and formatted according to the APA guidelines
  • Here is a resource to help you write a White paper:
  • https://contently.com/strategist/2012/02/10/how-to-write-a-white-paper/ (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.

Health Medical >The Case of Jesica Santillon

Health Medical >The Case of Jesica Santillon

The word count distribution must include at least 350 words in response to each question. 1400 words total and 3 scholarly sources total. I wanted to address the “Real Time” requirement in the Case Summary section so that you don’t lose points unnecessarily. Here is a rule of thumb to work with: If the issue did not occur after January 2018, it should not feature in your case summary. This means your Case Summary essay should be an update of what has occurred over the past 12 months.

In addition, don’t quote scholarly journal articles in the Case Summary. Typically, scholarly journal articles will not be “real time.” Moreover, quoting scholarly journals in the Case Summary tends to make students stray into analysis and application, rather than remaining focused on summary. The scholarly journal references should be reserved for your analysis and application essays. References for the Case Summary section should be current online sources. RESEARCH: You need to cite at least three Scholarly Journal articles in addition to citing the course textbook.

Library research is required in the COMPLETE assignment of each unit. At least (2) of your citations must be from scholarly journal articles with references and must use citations from the downloaded book, Burns, L. R., Bradley, E. H., & Weiner, B. J. (2011). Shortell and Kaluzny’s Health Care Management: Organizational Design and Behavior (6th ed.).

Wikipedia, Wiki Answers, About.com, Ask.com, Yahoo Answers, eHow, Personal blogs, and other sources of that ilk are not credible for academic work. Quoting such sources as credible is strictly forbidden.

Finding Articles in EBSCO (Library Help)

Here are 2 links that should help you in finding articles in the library:

Ebsco-finding articles

Ebsco-in a minute

Read the Case Study on page 184 called The Case of Jesica Santillon. Answer the following questions.

1. In a narrative format, discuss the key facts and critical issues presented in the case.

2. What social and cultural barriers may have made it difficult for the doctors to communicate with Jesica’s family? What might have the doctors done to increase the chances that Jesica’s family understood the true nature of the problems in this terrible circumstance?

3. How would you organize the complex set of steps required in this transplant process to ensure that misunderstandings do not occur in handoffs between professionals?

4. If you were the Duke Medical Center CEO, what general communication strategy would you put in place to manage the stakeholders in this case? In particular, how would your messages to each group differ from the others?

The word count distribution must include at least 350 words in response to each question. 1400 words total and 3 scholarly sources total. I wanted to address the “Real Time” requirement in the Case Summary section so that you don’t lose points unnecessarily. Here is a rule of thumb to work with: If the issue did not occur after January 2018, it should not feature in your case summary. This means your Case Summary essay should be an update of what has occurred over the past 12 months.

In addition, don’t quote scholarly journal articles in the Case Summary. Typically, scholarly journal articles will not be “real time.” Moreover, quoting scholarly journals in the Case Summary tends to make students stray into analysis and application, rather than remaining focused on summary. The scholarly journal references should be reserved for your analysis and application essays. References for the Case Summary section should be current online sources. RESEARCH: You need to cite at least three Scholarly Journal articles in addition to citing the course textbook.

Library research is required in the COMPLETE assignment of each unit. At least (2) of your citations must be from scholarly journal articles with references and must use citations from the downloaded book, Burns, L. R., Bradley, E. H., & Weiner, B. J. (2011). Shortell and Kaluzny’s Health Care Management: Organizational Design and Behavior (6th ed.).

Wikipedia, Wiki Answers, About.com, Ask.com, Yahoo Answers, eHow, Personal blogs, and other sources of that ilk are not credible for academic work. Quoting such sources as credible is strictly forbidden.

Finding Articles in EBSCO (Library Help)

Here are 2 links that should help you in finding articles in the library:

Ebsco-finding articles

The word count distribution must include at least 350 words in response to each question. 1400 words total and 3 scholarly sources total. I wanted to address the “Real Time” requirement in the Case Summary section so that you don’t lose points unnecessarily. Here is a rule of thumb to work with: If the issue did not occur after January 2018, it should not feature in your case summary. This means your Case Summary essay should be an update of what has occurred over the past 12 months.

In addition, don’t quote scholarly journal articles in the Case Summary. Typically, scholarly journal articles will not be “real time.” Moreover, quoting scholarly journals in the Case Summary tends to make students stray into analysis and application, rather than remaining focused on summary. The scholarly journal references should be reserved for your analysis and application essays. References for the Case Summary section should be current online sources. RESEARCH: You need to cite at least three Scholarly Journal articles in addition to citing the course textbook.

Library research is required in the COMPLETE assignment of each unit. At least (2) of your citations must be from scholarly journal articles with references and must use citations from the downloaded book, Burns, L. R., Bradley, E. H., & Weiner, B. J. (2011). Shortell and Kaluzny’s Health Care Management: Organizational Design and Behavior (6th ed.).

Wikipedia, Wiki Answers, About.com, Ask.com, Yahoo Answers, eHow, Personal blogs, and other sources of that ilk are not credible for academic work. Quoting such sources as credible is strictly forbidden.

Finding Articles in EBSCO (Library Help)

Here are 2 links that should help you in finding articles in the library:

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

Ebsco-finding articles

Ebsco-in a minute

Read the Case Study on page 184 called The Case of Jesica Santillon. Answer the following questions.

1. In a narrative format, discuss the key facts and critical issues presented in the case.

2. What social and cultural barriers may have made it difficult for the doctors to communicate with Jesica’s family? What might have the doctors done to increase the chances that Jesica’s family understood the true nature of the problems in this terrible circumstance?

3. How would you organize the complex set of steps required in this transplant process to ensure that misunderstandings do not occur in handoffs between professionals?

4. If you were the Duke Medical Center CEO, what general communication strategy would you put in place to manage the stakeholders in this case? In particular, how would your messages to each group differ from the others?

Ebsco-in a minute

Read the Case Study on page 184 called The Case of Jesica Santillon. Answer the following questions.

1. In a narrative format, discuss the key facts and critical issues presented in the case.

2. What social and cultural barriers may have made it difficult for the doctors to communicate with Jesica’s family? What might have the doctors done to increase the chances that Jesica’s family understood the true nature of the problems in this terrible circumstance?

3. How would you organize the complex set of steps required in this transplant process to ensure that misunderstandings do not occur in handoffs between professionals?

4. If you were the Duke Medical Center CEO, what general communication strategy would you put in place to manage the stakeholders in this case? In particular, how would your messages to each group differ from the others?

Health Medical >Power Point Presentation

Health Medical >Power Point Presentation

PowerPoint Presentations of 15-20 slides

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

Slides should have no more than 4-6 lines of text per slide, and 1-3 ideas per slide max. Text should be in bullet format, not paragraph/prose format. Information should be conveyed in a concise but comprehensible manner. With speaker notes.

Overview of a regulatory agency healthcare emergency management standards and/or regulations (choose one). Don’t just provide background. Be sure to take a deep dive and describe the importance of the regulatory agency and how their regulations have impacted healthcare.

  • Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)
  • National Firefighter Professionals Association (NFPA)
  • The Joint Commission (TJC)

Journal articles preferred as references

The Health Emergency Response Team HERT Discussion

The Health Emergency Response Team HERT Discussion

200 words each with references

Post one:

The health field has different department specialists that handle the most critical tasks. The Health Emergency Response Team (HERT) is one of the special units in the medical area, and the Emergency Management Program Manager will be found in this team. Below are crucial competencies for the EMPM:

Communication and Cooperation

Communication gets things done. Effective communication skill is crucial for the EMPM since it has to pass meaningful, concise and clear messages to the rest of the team members. Also during training, missions and sometimes communicating to the public needs effective communication skills. Cooperation skills are important in such a team. Cooperation is unity and unity is power. The EMPM should not be biased, despising or neglecting but should be diplomatic, promoting peace and unity in the team (Barbera. et al., 2017).

Critical Thinking and Decision-Making

The EMPM is a director with many obligations and responsibilities. Management as a field of its own needs critical thinking and ability to make sound decisions. The social, economic and health issues surround the EMPM. Creativity and analyzing ability will help in decision making since the emergency itself is a critical issue that needs clear directions that may not bring negative effects. Saving lives from critical situations call for a proper course of actions with proper decisions made after critical thinking (Barbera. et al., 2017).

Time Management and Organization

Managing time and being organized increases efficiency in tackling different. There will always be various tasks that need to be sorted out at scheduled times. Planning, organizing and prioritizing tasks of higher importance in time will save lives during emergencies. Failure to manage time, organize events and course of actions, will lead to a large workload that cannot be tackled simultaneously; hence everything will fail. Time is a crucial resource in the field and organization is a function of managers (Barbera. et al., 2017). Such skills are therefore vital to the EMPM.

To conclude, I consider the three competencies the most important for the EMPM because effective communication gets thing done the right way. Cooperation works in teamwork and means pulling together. Critical thinking and decision making facilitates smooth running of operations when time is well managed and thing properly organized. The three skills are pillars of all managers.

References

Barbera, J. A., Macintyre, A. G., Shaw, G., Seefried, V., Westerman, L., & de Cosmo, S. (2007).

Healthcare emergency management competencies: Competency framework final report. The George Washington University: Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management.

Post Two:

The emergency management system required specific skills and knowledge that need to be mastered by all individuals from all levels of the chain of command. Indeed, the level of experience will play an important role to master these skills and knowledge. First and foremost, in the emergency management system, all individuals must be able to think outside of the box. Especially in case of disaster when no one can predict what is coming next or what are the challenges that might have influences on the whole operation. In this situation, the need for critical thinking skills rises among all staff and managers to be able to defeat the challenges and to consider the alternatives. Therefore, they would need to possess strong critical thinking and problem-solving abilities to make rational decisions in a time of stress and chaos. The existence of this skill will enable them to come up with some creative solutions for future problems. Furthermore, mastering critical thinking skills will allow first responders, public safety, and security personnel to determine where their assistance is most needed as well as enable them to deal in an unbiased and effective manner.

Moreover, as another crucial skill that should be mastered among emergency managers and all individuals who participate in the emergency operation plan is effective communication. Of course, communication is a skill that cannot be overstated in importance when it comes to emergency management services. The need for effective communication is evident during the process of emergency operation plan, especially when dealing with a large number of individuals and staff. For instance, effective communication with agency representatives, emergency personnel, and the public during training, drills, planning, and actual emergencies to ensure the whole operation is going in the right direction. As well as, effective communication and cooperation among emergency managers and staff will enhance the possibility of a positive outcome. Also, a certain level of diplomacy is required to bring people together and to unify their efforts to get the job done.

Last but not least, as another essential skill in emergency manager life is the proper time management. Undoubtedly, with all obligations and tasks, we should put in mind the necessity of the time management to prioritize and decide tasks are of higher importance. Being organized will help us to sort through all of the details to maintain efficiency and to maximize how much we accomplish as an essential thing to do is to link the required tasks with the time frame to ensure that the goal that we set is achievable. Furthermore, as emergency managers, we should be able to shift gears and move on to another task and therefore, with proper time management and organizing our work we will be able to overcome the obstacles and be satisfied with the outcome. And to reach such a level of satisfaction, it is critical to master all these skills.

References

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

Home. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.emergency-management-degree.org/faq/wh…

(n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.insightassessment.com/Uses/Client-Solu…

Top Skills Sought from Emergency and Disaster Management Pros. (2013, May 03). Retrieved from https://onlinecareertips.com/2013/05/top-skills-so…

UMUC Application of Management Functions to a Case Study

UMUC Application of Management Functions to a Case Study

Application of Management Functions to a Case Study

Scenario: You are employed by a 240-bed urban medical center. You directly supervise 30 staff Physical Therapists in the Rehabilitation Department in which you are the Department Head (DH). Over the last 5 years leadership has discussed merging with another smaller hospital in the local area. This hospital is a 120-bed facility that has faced various financial and patient care safety issues. As a result of the merger the management structure has been realigned to ensure operational functions of both physical facilities are controlled by a single manager-you have been chosen as that new manager.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

Instructions: Choose one of the six basic management functions: Planning, Organizing, Directing, Decision Making, Staffing or Controlling. Clearly describe why you chose this function and why you feel this particular function is essential to your effective management as a result of the merger.

Formatting:

  • Title Page
  • 2-3 pages (double spaced) to include introduction, body, conclusion or summary
  • Reference Page (2 references minimum)
  • Written document should conform to American Psychological Association (APA) 6th edition

Long-Term Care Management: Continuous Quality Improvement discussion

Long-Term Care Management: Continuous Quality Improvement discussion

Long-Term Care Management Discussion – Wk 10

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

“Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI)” Please respond to the following:

  • Identify a contact person for the quality improvement program at a long-term care facility in your geographic area. Conduct a brief in-person, telephone, or email interview with this contact person, concentrating on the following areas:
    • Structures
    • Processes
    • Outcomes
    • Regulatory minimum standards
  • Next, describe the current quality improvement program in place at this facility, focusing on the areas listed above, and specify the main roles involved in this program.
  • Finally, determine whether or not this quality improvement program is aligned with Deming’s Process Improvement Cycle. Provide a rationale for your determination.

***This is a discussion, NOT a paper. Need 2 strong paragraphs and 1 reference. No plagiarism!***