MGMT420 UNCC Traditional and Enterprise Risk Management Paper

/in /by

MGMT420 UNCC Traditional and Enterprise Risk Management Paper

Write a 1,050- to 1,400-word paper about enterprise risk management (ERM). Include the following in your paper:

Explain the difference between traditional and enterprise risk management.
Explain why enterprise risk management is a more effective approach for today’s organizations.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

Explain key drivers of value-driven enterprise risk management.
Explain how these key drivers are applied within health care to drive enterprise risk management. Provide examples.

Cite at least 3 outside sources.

Harvard University Health Information and Quality Management Questions

/in /by

Harvard University Health Information and Quality Management Questions

Instructions: Answer ALL the questions below. You may use the text (chapter 3, Introduction to Healthcare Quality Management, Third Edition Patrice L. Spath) ( I will send the lecture with the slides when this gets assigned) a. You may also use external sources to answer these questions. PLEASE cite your work and sources. Upload a word document. All questions require a minimum of 200 words each.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

Q1: Can Government intervention in HIT be justified? Why or why not? (Hint: Chapter 3 – pages 53-56.) 5 points

Q2: What is HIPAA? Why was it passed? What are the two key provisions of this legislation? What are the potential benefits to healthcareorganizations to be gained by compliance with HIPAA standards? What are the potential benefits to patients and consumers of health care? (Hint: read glandon, chapter 3 pages 59-64 + www.hit.gov – cite your sources; summarize benefits in your own words) 5 points

Q 3: What is the HITECH act? Why was it passed? What are the potential benefits to providers (doctors and hospitals) by responding to this legislation? What are the potential drawbacks? (Hint: read Glandon, chapter 3 pgs-64-70; summarize benefits and drawbacks in your own words) 5 points

Albany College of Pharmacy Healthcare Management Case Study Analysis

/in /by

Albany College of Pharmacy Healthcare Management Case Study Analysis

HCMN 435– Patient Safety Case Analysis Paper – Instructions

Instructions: First read the case you have chosen from the case repository on blackboard thoroughly AND review the “Learning from Defects” tool provided. This tool was developed and adapted by the Quality and Safety Research Group led by Professor Pronovost et al to help health care providers identify and learn from defects utilizing a systems approach.  The contributory factors framework helps providers gain a deeper appreciation of harm as it occurs usually due to breakdown of systems (multiple factors).  It steers clear of blame and punitive behavior and encourages teams to focus on learning.

Attempt ALL four questions in response to the case provided below as though you are part of the team investigating.  What happened, why (contributory factors), key contributory factors that led to the event. Be sure to categorize your contributory factors into patient factors, caregiver factors, task, teamwork and communication etc.   Please use QI tools such as flow chart, cause and effect/fishbone and pareto charts to justify your interventions.  These charts should be part of your appendices.  Suggest interventions so that such events will not occur in the future (be sure that the interventions you suggest address the key contributory factors).  Then provide measures that you will assess to know if your suggested interventions are working.  Assume that you have implemented your recommendations. How will you know that these worked to reduce/eliminate risk? What measures would help confirm improvements.  Please include an abstract as your first page and include titles and sub-titles (e.g. what happened, why (contributory factors), key contributory factors etc.

Try to be objective and use facts from the case. It is recommended that you take time reading the case and ascertain key contributory factors prior to suggesting any intervention.  You may use additional sheets of paper to make rough notes, provide your rationale for choices/additional descriptions, flow chart etc.  You should prepare an outline first for your case analysis.  Feel free to visit your instructor during office hours for any questions that you may have concerning this assignment.

Format and page length:  APA 6.0 format, and 6 pages excluding appendices and cover page– see syllabus for other details.

Grading Rubric:  Your responses will be graded on the basis of clarity of thought, originality, accuracy and specificity of content, and the approach utilized in analyzing the defect and providing recommendations.

Possible maximum points by question:

Question # 1 (10 points),

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

Question # 2 (40 points),

Question # 3 (40 points),

Question # 4 (10 points).

Total = 100 points

Harvard University Healthcare Quality Management Questions

/in /by

Harvard University Healthcare Quality Management Questions

Answer ALL the questions below. PLEASE READ THE CHAPTER PRIOR:

1) Give a brief description of three secondary storage media, including their advantages and disadvantages.

2) Suggest how the use of a patient ID bracelet containing a barcode representation of the patient’s ID and a barcode scanner can lead to improved quality of care in a hospital?

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

3) Distinguish between an ‘interfaced’ and an ‘integrated’ system. Provide an example of where one model would provide an advantage over another.

4) What is ‘system software and application software” . Provide an example of each?

5) How does mobile computing differ from wireless communication?

Each question carries equal points. Please be clear and specific in your responses. Please cite your sources in APA 6.0 format. Note: Please read chapter 6 and review slides prior to answering these questions.\\

I will provide you with the lecture and the powerpoints and the book name, but I do not have the book itself. ” Introduction to Healthcare Quality Management, Third EditionPatrice L. Spath”

* NO other sources needed

Albany College of Pharmacy Healthcare Management Case Study Analysis

/in /by

Albany College of Pharmacy Healthcare Management Case Study Analysis

HCMN 435– Patient Safety Case Analysis Paper – Instructions

Instructions: First read the case you have chosen from the case repository on blackboard thoroughly AND review the “Learning from Defects” tool provided. This tool was developed and adapted by the Quality and Safety Research Group led by Professor Pronovost et al to help health care providers identify and learn from defects utilizing a systems approach.  The contributory factors framework helps providers gain a deeper appreciation of harm as it occurs usually due to breakdown of systems (multiple factors).  It steers clear of blame and punitive behavior and encourages teams to focus on learning.

Attempt ALL four questions in response to the case provided below as though you are part of the team investigating.  What happened, why (contributory factors), key contributory factors that led to the event. Be sure to categorize your contributory factors into patient factors, caregiver factors, task, teamwork and communication etc.   Please use QI tools such as flow chart, cause and effect/fishbone and pareto charts to justify your interventions.  These charts should be part of your appendices.  Suggest interventions so that such events will not occur in the future (be sure that the interventions you suggest address the key contributory factors).  Then provide measures that you will assess to know if your suggested interventions are working.  Assume that you have implemented your recommendations. How will you know that these worked to reduce/eliminate risk? What measures would help confirm improvements.  Please include an abstract as your first page and include titles and sub-titles (e.g. what happened, why (contributory factors), key contributory factors etc.

Try to be objective and use facts from the case. It is recommended that you take time reading the case and ascertain key contributory factors prior to suggesting any intervention.  You may use additional sheets of paper to make rough notes, provide your rationale for choices/additional descriptions, flow chart etc.  You should prepare an outline first for your case analysis.  Feel free to visit your instructor during office hours for any questions that you may have concerning this assignment.

Format and page length:  APA 6.0 format, and 6 pages excluding appendices and cover page– see syllabus for other details.

Grading Rubric:  Your responses will be graded on the basis of clarity of thought, originality, accuracy and specificity of content, and the approach utilized in analyzing the defect and providing recommendations.

Possible maximum points by question:

Question # 1 (10 points),

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

Question # 2 (40 points),

Question # 3 (40 points),

Question # 4 (10 points).

Total = 100 points

Harvard University Healthcare Quality Management Questions

/in /by

Harvard University Healthcare Quality Management Questions

Answer ALL the questions below. PLEASE READ THE CHAPTER PRIOR:

1) Give a brief description of three secondary storage media, including their advantages and disadvantages.

2) Suggest how the use of a patient ID bracelet containing a barcode representation of the patient’s ID and a barcode scanner can lead to improved quality of care in a hospital?

3) Distinguish between an ‘interfaced’ and an ‘integrated’ system. Provide an example of where one model would provide an advantage over another.

4) What is ‘system software and application software” . Provide an example of each?

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

5) How does mobile computing differ from wireless communication?

Each question carries equal points. Please be clear and specific in your responses. Please cite your sources in APA 6.0 format. Note: Please read chapter 6 and review slides prior to answering these questions.\\

I will provide you with the lecture and the powerpoints and the book name, but I do not have the book itself. ” Introduction to Healthcare Quality Management, Third EditionPatrice L. Spath”

* NO other sources needed

Policy and Health Promotion Assignment

/in /by

Policy and Health Promotion Assignment

NSG6002 Health Policy and Health Promotion in Advanced Nursing Practices Week 1 Discussion Describe how you will utilize and implement the IOM Nursing Reports from 2010 and 2016 in your role as an Advanced Practice Nurse NSG6002 Health Policy and Health Promotion in Advanced Nursing Practices Week 2 Discussion Discuss how health policy and initiatives are used to guide and direct your clinical practice as an Advanced Practice Nurse NSG6002 Health Policy and Health Promotion in Advanced Nursing Practices Week 3 Discussion Identify the role of patient safety and the influence on the Federal initiatives that are used to prevent unintentional death as a result of medical mistakes. NSG6002 Health Policy and Health Promotion in Advanced Nursing Practices Week 4 Discussion Describe what specific resources or federal agencies that you will utilize to remain informed and current in public health trends and practices NSG6002 Health Policy and Health Promotion in Advanced Nursing Practices Week 5 Discussion Discuss the changing landscape of the US health care system through the ACA and specific initiatives that have been funded, enacted and currently implemented to improve health care for all Americans NSG6002 Health Policy and Health Promotion in Advanced Nursing Practices Week 1 Project Provide Instructor with the Topic of Health Promotion Paper for Approval NSG6002 Health Policy and Health Promotion in Advanced Nursing Practices Week 2 Project Student will develop a Legislative Matrix based upon the specific legislators in a residential/geographical legislative district. State and Federal legislators will be identified: State Representatives, Senators, Congressman and Governor. Each legislator’s assigned committees and any active legislation bills and/or past legislative initiatives will be identified.

ORDER   A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER   NOW

This information will be used to assist in the development of the Legislative Communication assignment. NSG6002 Health Policy and Health Promotion in Advanced Nursing Practices Week 3 Project This written assignment requires the student to investigate his/her local, state and federal legislators and explore their assigned committees and legislative commitments. The student is expected to investigate current and actual legislative initiatives that have either passed or pending approval by the house, senate or Governor’s office. The student will draft a letter to a specific legislator and offer support or constructive argument against pending policy or legislation. The letter must be supported with a minimum of 3 evidence based primary citations. NSG6002 Health Policy and Health Promotion in Advanced Nursing Practices Week 4 Project Health Policy Paper Forward the topic of the health policy paper to faculty at the end of Week One, Health policy unfolds daily and drives clinical practice in the US. The student will investigate current policies or legislation underway for a specific health-related issue. The Student will develop a scholarly APA formatted paper supported by evidence. The policy paper rubric: Introduction to population or problem (incidence, prevalence, epidemiology, cost burden etc) Description of how the policy is intended for a specific population, program or organization Specific legislators involved in the policy development and dissemination Identify the role of the APRN in assisting with the policy or refuting the policy – this requires the evidence to support opinion, ideas and/or concepts. Discuss how the policy influences clinical practice and is used to promote best outcomes Examine how the policy can be used by the interprofessional team to ensure coordinated and comprehensive care for the specific population Conclusion – summarize findings APA format – use of primary peer-reviewed references as much as possible Submission Details: Support your responses with examples. Cite any sources in APA format. Submit your document to the Submissions Area by the due date assigned. NSG6002 Health Policy and Health Promotion in Advanced Nursing Practices Week 1 Knowledge Check Question 1 How has the Quality Chasm Report been used to direct US health care? Question 1 options: a) Is not used to direct health care in the US b) IOM designed this document to direct medical practices in the US c) This report has been used as the framework and foundation for multiple health policy initiatives since its release in 2001 Question 2 What are the differences in patient safety and effective health care since the 1999 release of To Err is Human and the 2016 report from the CDC regarding medical mishaps and quality of care in the US? Question 2 options: There is no correlation between these 2 reports There has been little improvement in health care practices and patient safety between the 2 reports Care quality in the US is the most comprehensive when compared to other country health care practices. Question 2 What are the differences in patient safety and effective health care since the 1999 release of To Err is Human and the 2016 report from the CDC regarding medical mishaps and quality of care in the US? Question 2 options: There is no correlation between these 2 reports There has been little improvement in health care practices and patient safety between the 2 reports Care quality in the US is the most comprehensive when compared to other country health care practices. Question 4 How does health policy specifically influence health care practice in the US? Question 4 options: Directs efforts by the CDC and protects Americans against population based disease. Influences how health care is reimbursed and determines APN payment for services. Directs specific evidence based practice guideline development and dissemination All of the above Question 5 What specific developments have primarily occurred because of the Affordable Care Act (ACA)? Question 5 options: ACA has been appealed and no longer enacted Development of patient centered outcomes, use of comparative effectiveness research, quality payment structures that impact APN reimbursement Nothing has been changed by the ACA other than Medicaid Expansion and Affordable Health Care None of the Above

 

Policy and Health Promotion

Albany College of Pharmacy Healthcare Management Case Study Analysis

/in /by

Albany College of Pharmacy Healthcare Management Case Study Analysis

  1. Case Analysis (Individual) –Quality/Patient Safety Improvement Plan: Students will analyze utilizing QI tools. The case is (it is hard to kill 15yr) students will use the information, and data provided from the case they identified asnd utilize specific QI/PS tools and techniques to address the problem at hand. Deliverables will include a QI/Patient Safety Case Analysis that addresses – what happened (incident), why it happened (contributory factors), key contributory factors (two to three), recommendations to address the key contributory factors (with evidence to support effectiveness of interventions), measures to assess improvement and rationale. You will provide charts, graphs and use the learning from defects tool and other tools – fish bone, pareto chart etc.Length of the paper: The case analysis should be six to (double-spaced) excluding appendices, cover page, and references.You must use sub-headings e.g. what happened, why/contributory factors, key contributory factors that led to the event, recommendations to address key contributory factors and rationale, measures to assess improvement and conclusion.Please refer to detailed instructions on the course attached

    ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

ISM FREE PAPER NOWNote – A thorough case analysis requires you to read the case at least twice, make notes, use facts and provide recommendations that will address the issues identified.Please familiarize yourself with the tools (learning from defect and seven basic quality tools).All the material will be attached to help you with this case.

* the case, the instructions and QI tool. The book is (Introduction to Healthcare Quality Management, Third Edition Patrice L. Spath ) I do not have*

HCMN 435– Patient Safety Case Analysis Paper – Instructions

Instructions: First read the case you have chosen from the case repository on blackboard thoroughly AND review the “Learning from Defects” tool provided. This tool was developed and adapted by the Quality and Safety Research Group led by Professor Pronovost et al to help health care providers identify and learn from defects utilizing a systems approach.  The contributory factors framework helps providers gain a deeper appreciation of harm as it occurs usually due to breakdown of systems (multiple factors).  It steers clear of blame and punitive behavior and encourages teams to focus on learning.

Attempt ALL four questions in response to the case provided below as though you are part of the team investigating.  What happened, why (contributory factors), key contributory factors that led to the event. Be sure to categorize your contributory factors into patient factors, caregiver factors, task, teamwork and communication etc.   Please use QI tools such as flow chart, cause and effect/fishbone and pareto charts to justify your interventions.  These charts should be part of your appendices.  Suggest interventions so that such events will not occur in the future (be sure that the interventions you suggest address the key contributory factors).  Then provide measures that you will assess to know if your suggested interventions are working.  Assume that you have implemented your recommendations. How will you know that these worked to reduce/eliminate risk? What measures would help confirm improvements.  Please include an abstract as your first page and include titles and sub-titles (e.g. what happened, why (contributory factors), key contributory factors etc.

Try to be objective and use facts from the case. It is recommended that you take time reading the case and ascertain key contributory factors prior to suggesting any intervention.  You may use additional sheets of paper to make rough notes, provide your rationale for choices/additional descriptions, flow chart etc.  You should prepare an outline first for your case analysis.  Feel free to visit your instructor during office hours for any questions that you may have concerning this assignment.

Format and page length:  APA 6.0 format, and 6 pages excluding appendices and cover page– see syllabus for other details.

Grading Rubric:  Your responses will be graded on the basis of clarity of thought, originality, accuracy and specificity of content, and the approach utilized in analyzing the defect and providing recommendations.

Possible maximum points by question:

Question # 1 (10 points),

Question # 2 (40 points),

Question # 3 (40 points),

Question # 4 (10 points).

Total = 100 points

Harvard University Semantic Interoperability & EHR Characteristics Questions

/in /by

Harvard University Semantic Interoperability & EHR Characteristics Questions

Please answer these two questions only. One page should do it. I will provide all the materials you need to answer these two. No need for internet searching (lectures and powerpoints)

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

What are the characteristics of a robust Electronic Health Record (in other words, what are the capabilities of a sophisticated EHR)? Hint – refer to EMRAM when answering this question.

Define semantic interoperability and explain it in lay terms. Why is semantic interoperability an important concept in health care? How is the Office of the National Coordinator, HIT influencing this in HCOs?

 

Tags: health care system healthcare management Healthcare Administration electronic health record

Week 4 – Case Study On Death And Dying

/in /by

Week 4 – Case Study On Death And Dying

Assignment: Death And Dying

The practice of health care providers at all levels brings you into contact with people from a variety of faiths. This calls for knowledge and understanding of a diversity of faith expressions; for the purpose of this course, the focus will be on the Christian worldview.

Based on “Case Study: End of Life Decisions,” the Christian worldview, and the worldview questions presented in the required topic study materials you will complete an ethical analysis of George’s situation and his decision from the perspective of the Christian worldview.

Provide a 1,500-2,000-word ethical analysis while answering the following questions:

  1. How would George interpret his suffering in light of the Christian narrative, with an emphasis on the fallenness of the world?
  2. How would  George interpret his suffering in light of the Christian narrative, with an emphasis on the hope of resurrection? Week 4 – Case Study On Death And Dying
  3. As George contemplates life with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), how would the Christian worldview inform his view about the value of his life as a person?
  4. What sorts of values and considerations would the Christian worldview focus on in deliberating about whether or not George should opt for euthanasia?
  5. Given the above, what options would be morally justified in the Christian worldview for George and why?
  6. Based on your worldview, what decision would you make if you were in George’s situation?

    ORDER   A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER   NOW

Remember to support your responses with the topic study materials.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide. An abstract is required.

This assignment uses a rubric.You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

1. Bioethics: A Primer for Christians

Read Chapters 6 and 12 in Bioethics: A Primer for Christians.

http://gcumedia.com/digital-resources/wm-b-eerdmans-publishing-co/2013/bioethics_a-primer-for-christians_ebook_3e.php
2. Called to Care: A Christian Worldview for Nursing

Read Chapters 10-12 in Called to Care: A Christian Worldview for Nursing.

http://gcumedia.com/digital-resources/intervarsity-press/2006/called-to-care_a-christian-worldview-for-nursing_ebook_2e.php

3. Defining Death: Medical, Legal and Ethical Issues in the Determination of Death

Read the Introduction and Chapters 1-3 of “Defining Death: Medical, Legal and Ethical Issues in the Determination of Death” by the President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research (1984). Week 4 – Case Study On Death And Dying

https://repository.library.georgetown.edu/bitstream/handle/10822/559345/defining_death.pdf?sequence=1

Rubric

  1. Analysis of how the man would interpret his suffering in light of the Christian narrative and the fallenness of the world is clear and demonstrates a deep understanding that is skillfully supported by topic study materials. 12%
  2. Analysis of how the man would interpret his suffering in light of the Christian narrative and the hope of resurrection is clear and demonstrates a deep understanding that is skillfully supported by topic study materials. 12%
  3. Analysis of how the Christian worldview of the man might inform his view about the value of his life as a person with ALS is clear and demonstrates a deep understanding that is skillfully supported by topic study materials.12%
  4. Evaluation of which values and considerations the Christian worldview focuses on when deliberating the option of euthanasia for the man is clear and demonstrates a deep understanding that is skillfully supported by topic study materials. 12%
  5. Evaluation of which options would be justified in the Christian worldview for the man is clear and demonstrates a deep understanding that is skillfully supported by topic study materials. 12%
  6. Reflection hypothesis of which personal choices would be make if faced with ALS based on personal worldview is clear, relevant, and insightful. 10%
  7. Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. 7%
  8. Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. 8%
  9. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. 5%
  10. All format elements are correct.5%
  11. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. 5%. Week 4 – Case Study On Death And Dying