Literature Review
Literature Review
1- Class Book and Electronic Resources Class Book Being Used: Zimmerman, M. A., & Holden, D. J. (Eds.). (2009). A practical guide to program evaluation planning: Theory and case examples. SAGE Publications Inc.
ORDER A PALGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW
https://books.google.de/books?hl=en&lr=&id=6N0R9nXXwoEC&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=a+practical+guide +to+program+evaluation+planning&ots=yXhKVmI9Gg&sig=lKoQfYwA48RReB_IKAYGSRIk40#v=onepage&q=a%20practical%20guide%20to%20program%20evaluation%20planning&f=false Electronic Resource: – Read Chapters 1 and 2 in A Practical Guide to Program Evaluation Planning: Theory and Case Examples. – Read “Logic Model,” located on the Program Development and Evaluation page of the University of Wisconsin website. http://www.uwex.edu/ces/pdande/evaluation/evallogicmodel.html Literature Review: Table of Evidence Student Name: Describe the barrier or issue in health care that you want to address for your Capstone Project Paper (two or three sentences): Criteria Article 1 Article 2 Article 3 Author, Journal (PeerReviewed), and Permalink or Working Link to Access Article Article Title and Year Published Research Questions (Qualitative)/Hypothesis (Quantitative), and Purposes/Aim of Study Design (Quantitative, Qualitative, or other) Setting/Sample Methods: Intervention/Instruments Analysis Key Findings Recommendations Explanation of How the Article Supports Your Identified Barrier or Issue in Health Care 2 Article 4 Article 5 Criteria Article 1 Article 2 Article 3 Article 4 Article 5 Article 1 Article 2 Article 3 Article 4 Article 5 Author, Journal (PeerReviewed), and Permalink or Working Link to Access Article Article Title and Year Published Research Questions (Qualitative)/Hypothesis (Quantitative), and Purposes/Aim of Study Design (Quantitative, Qualitative, or other) Setting/Sample Methods: Intervention/Instruments Analysis Key Findings Recommendations Explanation of How the Article Supports Your Identified Barrier or Issue in Health Care Criteria 3 Author, Journal (PeerReviewed), and Permalink or Working Link to Access Article Article Title and Year Published Research Questions (Qualitative)/Hypothesis (Quantitative), and Purposes/Aim of Study Design (Quantitative, Qualitative, or other) Setting/Sample Methods: Intervention/Instruments Analysis Key Findings Recommendations Explanation of How the Article Supports Your Identified Barrier or Issue in Health Care 4 Literature Review: Table of Evidence Grading Form Instructors will use this form to review each category for accuracy and appropriateness of articles, article interpretation (making sure articles meet assignment criteria), and to assess the degree to which the articles support the approved Capstone Project topic. Each category is scored based upon how the student’s work correlates within the criteria provided. Feedback is provided on each category to clarify the strengths and weakness of the material. Use this feedback to complete your Capstone Project Paper. Student Name: Category % Value Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and Permalink or Working Link to Access Article 15 Less Than Satisfactory Satisfactory Excellent 0 – 9 Points 10 – 13 Points 14 – 15 Points Eight or more research articles do not meet the criteria for being peer reviewed or from nursing journals. A number of relevant research articles are insufficient for this project. Less than eight articles are submitted overall. Eight or more research articles meet the majority of the requirements for the assignment. Eight or more research articles are clearly identified and meet the assignment criteria. Web links are present, but not all are sufficient to validate content. All Web links are present and sufficient for content validation. Moderate changes are needed. No changes or minor changes are needed. Web links are missing or are insufficient to accurately validate content. Major changes are needed. Instructor Comments Points______________ Article Title and Year Published 10 0 – 6 Points 7 – 8 Points 9 – 10 Points Eight or more research articles do not have accurate titles. Eight or more research articles meet the majority of the requirements for the assignment. More recent publications are needed on only some articles or topics. Eight or more research articles are clearly identified and meet all assignment criteria. Most publications are more than 5 years old (minus seminal research). Points________________ No changes or minor changes are needed. Moderate changes are needed. Article Interpretation Quality Research Questions (Qualitative)/ Hypothesis (Quantitative), and Purposes/Aim of Study Less Than Satisfactory 5 Satisfactory Excellent 1 – 3 Points 4 Points 5 Points Research questions/ hypothesis are/is not clearly or accurately identified. Key information is missing in each category. Most research questions/ hypothesis are/is identified, and have key information presented in all articles, but with discrepancies. Key information is accurately presented for this category. Student does not identify purpose of study in any of the articles. Student identifies purpose only in some studies, or misidentifies purpose in some studies. Major changes are needed. Moderate changes are needed. 2 No changes or minor changes are needed. Instructor Comments Points________________ Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative) 5 1 – 3 Points 4 Points 5 Points Design identification (quantitative/qualitative) is missing in all or many of the articles. Design is identified for all articles, but with consistent misidentification of design type, or with major discrepancies. Design is accurately identified correctly for all articles. The majority of the articles have been incorrectly identified. Points______________ No changes or minor changes are needed. Moderate changes are needed. Major changes needed. Setting/Sample Methods: Intervention/ Instruments Analysis 5 5 5 1 – 3 Points 4 Points 5 Points Key information is missing or misidentified in each category. Key information is presented, but with discrepancies. All key information is accurately presented for each category. Major changes are needed. Moderate changes are needed. No changes or minor changes are needed. 1 – 3 Points 4 Points 5 Points Method information is missing for all or some articles. Method information is presented in all articles, but with inaccuracies. Methods are accurately presented for each category. Major changes are needed. Moderate changes are needed. No changes or minor changes are needed. 1 – 3 Points 4 Points 5 Points 3 Points______________ Points______________ Points______________ Analysis is missing for all or some articles. Analysis is presented for all articles, but with discrepancies. Analysis accurately presented for each article. Moderate changes are needed. No changes or minor changes are needed. 1 – 3 Points 4 Points 5 Points Key information on findings is missing in all or some articles. Key findings are presented in all articles, but with missing information or discrepancies. Key findings are accurately presented for this category. Major changes are needed. Key Findings 5 Major changes are needed. Recommendations 5 No changes or minor changes are needed. Moderate changes are needed. 1 – 3 Points 4 Points 5 Points Recommendations are missing on some or all articles. Recommendations are presented in all articles, but some are lacking in rationale, clarity, or accuracy. Recommendations are accurately presented for each category. Recommendations for all or many articles lack rationale, clarity, or accuracy. Points______________ Points______________ No changes or minor changes are needed. Moderate changes are needed. Major changes are needed. Supporting Rationale Less Than Satisfactory Satisfactory Excellent 4 Instructor Comments Explanation of How the Article Supports Capstone 40 0 – 27 Points 28 – 36 Points 37 – 40 Points Explanations are missing for all or some of the articles. Explanations are provided for all articles, but explanations are superficial. Thorough, detailed explanation is provided for all articles. Explanations generally lack adequate support and rational for the Capstone Project. Major changes are needed. Explanations offer minimal support and rationale to support the Capstone Project. Points______________ Specific article content is referenced, showing support for the Capstone Project. No changes or minor changes are needed. Moderate changes are needed. Overall Comments Total Points Awarded ______________ 5 Week 1 Assignment Instruction Literature Review * Identify a barrier or issue in health care that you want to address through your Capstone Project Paper. Perform a literature review on the barrier or issue using the School Library. Present 10 peerreviewed primary research articles. These articles should be either qualitative or quantitative. You may use either health care or nursing peer-reviewed journals; however, at least half of the primary articles must come from a peer-reviewed nursing journal. The peer-reviewed articles must consist of research published within the last 5 years. Use the “Literature Review: Table of Evidence” template to document your detailed assessment of each primary study. This document helps break down the components of each article to ensure the article meets the requirements for a professional nursing paper. Ensure that each of your articles provides information that meets each criterion listed. Provide a detailed and clear explanation when describing how each article supports your Capstone Project and evidence-based practice (between five and six sentences). This assignment uses a “Literature Review: Table of Evidence Grading Form” that corresponds to the “Literature Review: Table of Evidence” template. Instructors will be using the grading form to assess the assignment and provide feedback; therefore, students should review the grading form prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment. While APA format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide. ** See Attached Documents to assist with this assignment.
Purchase answer to see full attachment
