DNP815 GCU Theory Of Caring Behavior In Nursing Assignment

DNP815 GCU Theory Of Caring Behavior In Nursing Assignment

Course Code DNP-815 Class Code DNP-815-IO3210 Criteria Content Percentage 75.0% Translates and Applies a Selected Theory to Nursing Practice Using Actual Examples 15.0% Evaluation of the Conceptual-TheoreticalEmpirical (CTE) Linkages 12.0% Evaluation of the Selected Theory 12.0% Evaluation of the Empirical Indicators 12.0% Evaluation of Research Findings 12.0% Evaluation of the Utility and Soundness of the Practice Theory 12.0% Organization and Effectiveness 17.0% Thesis Development and Purpose 6.0% Argument Logic and Construction 6.0% Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Format 8.0% Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 4.0% Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style) 4.0% Total Weightage 100% Conceptual-Theoretical-Empirical Structure (CTE) Evaluation Unsatisfactory (0.00%) A translation and application of a selected theory to nursing practice using actual examples is not present. An evaluation of the CTE linkages is not present. An evaluation of the selected theory is not present. An evaluation of the empirical indicators is not present. An evaluation of the research findings is not present. An evaluation of the utility and soundness of the practice theory is not present. Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. No reference page is included. No citations are used. 200.0 Less than Satisfactory (74.00%) A translation and application of a selected theory to nursing practice using actual examples is present, but insufficient in detail or incomplete. An evaluation of the CTE linkages is present, but insufficient in detail or incomplete. An evaluation of the selected theory is present, but insufficient in detail or incomplete. An evaluation of the empirical indicators is present, but insufficient in detail or incomplete. An evaluation of the research findings is present, but insufficient in detail or incomplete. An evaluation of the utility and soundness of the practice theory is present, but insufficient in detail or incomplete. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. Satisfactory (79.00%) A translation and application of a selected theory to nursing practice using actual examples is present, but at a perfunctory level. An evaluation of the CTE linkages is present, but at a perfunctory level. An evaluation of the selected theory is present, but at a perfunctory level. An evaluation of the empirical indicators is present, but at a perfunctory level. An evaluation of the research findings is present, but at a perfunctory level. An evaluation of the utility and soundness of the practice theory is present, but at a perfunctory level. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. Good (87.00%) A translation and application of a selected theory to nursing practice using actual examples is present in full. Discussion is convincing. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. An evaluation of the CTE linkages is present in full. Discussion is convincing. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. An evaluation of the selected theory is present in full. Discussion is convincing. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. An evaluation of the empirical indicators is present in full. Discussion is convincing. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. An evaluation of the research findings is present in full. Discussion is convincing. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. An evaluation of the utility and soundness of the practice theory is present in full. Discussion is convincing. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. Excellent (100.00%) A translation and application of a selected theory to nursing practice using actual examples is present in full. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. An evaluation of the CTE linkages is present in full. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. An evaluation of the selected theory is present in full. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. An evaluation of the empirical indicators is present in full. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. An evaluation of the research findings is present in full. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. An evaluation of the utility and soundness of the practice theory is present in full. Discussion is insightful and forwardthinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. Comments Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. All format elements are correct. In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. Points Earned
Purchase answer to see full attachment