DNP815 HCAHPS Tool Caring Theory Application Case Report
DNP815 HCAHPS Tool Caring Theory Application Case Report
Course Code DNP-815 Class Code DNP-815-IO3210 Criteria Content Percentage 35.0% Minimum of Two Theories Discussed in the Course to Develop the Case Report 10.0% Application of One or More Theories to Describe Understanding of The Problem or Situation of Focus 5.0% Application of One or More Theories to the
ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW
Recommended Intervention or Solution Being Proposed 5.0% Development of the Case Report Across the Entire Scenario From the Identified Clinical or Health Care Problem Through Proposing an Intervention, Implementation, and Evaluation Using an Appropriate Research Instrument 5.0% Description of the Evaluation of the Selected Research Instrument 5.0% Explanation of the Tenets, Rationale for Selection, and Clear Application Using the Language of Theory 5.0% Case Requirements 35.0% Introduction and Problem Statement 5.0% Brief Literature Review 5.0% Description of the Case, Situation, or Conditions Explained From a Theoretical Perspective 5.0% Detailed Explanation of the Synthesized Literature Findings 5.0% Case Summary 5.0% Proposed Solutions to Remedy Identified Gaps, Inefficiencies, or Other Issues From a Theoretical Approach 5.0% Conclusion 5.0% Organization and Effectiveness 20.0% Thesis Development and Purpose 7.0% Argument Logic and Construction 8.0% Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Format 10.0% Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 5.0% Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Total Weightage 100% Case Report: Application of Theory Unsatisfactory (0.00%) A minimum of two theories discussed in the course are not used to develop the case report. Application of one or more theories to describe understanding of the problem or situation of focus is not present. Application of one or more theories to the recommended intervention or solution being proposed is not present. Development of the case report across the entire scenario from problem through proposed solution is not present. A description of the evaluation of the selected research instrument is not present. An explanation of the tenets, rationale for selection, and clear application using the language of theory is not present. An introduction with problem statement is not present. A brief literature review is not present. A description of the case, situation, or conditions is not present. A detailed explanation of the synthesized literature findings is not present. A case summary is not present. Proposed solutions are not present. A conclusion is not present. Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. No reference page is included. No citations are used. 300.0 Less than Satisfactory (74.00%) A minimum of two theories discussed in the course are used to develop the case report but are incomplete. Application of one or more theories to describe understanding of the problem or situation of focus is present but incomplete. Application of one or more theories to the recommended intervention or solution being proposed is present but incomplete. Development of the case report across the entire scenario from problem through proposed solution is present but incomplete. A description of the evaluation of the selected research instrument is present but incomplete. An explanation of the tenets, rationale for selection, and clear application using the language of theory is present but incomplete. An introduction with problem statement is present but incomplete. A brief literature review is present but incomplete. A description of the case, situation, or conditions is present but incomplete. A detailed explanation of the synthesized literature findings is present but incomplete. A case summary is present but incomplete. Proposed solutions are present but are incomplete. A conclusion is present but is incomplete. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. Satisfactory (79.00%) A minimum of two theories discussed in the course are used to develop the case report but at a perfunctory level. Application of one or more theories to describe understanding of the problem or situation of focus is present but done at a perfunctory level. Application of one or more theories to the recommended intervention or solution being proposed is present but done at a perfunctory level. Development of the case report across the entire scenario from problem through proposed solution is present but done at a perfunctory level. A description of the evaluation of the selected research instrument is present but done at a perfunctory level. An explanation of the tenets, rationale for selection, and clear application using the language of theory is present but done at a perfunctory level. An introduction with problem statement is present but rendered at a perfunctory level. A brief literature review is present but rendered at a perfunctory level. A description of the case, situation, or conditions is present but rendered at a perfunctory level. A detailed explanation of the synthesized literature findings is present but rendered at a perfunctory level. A case summary is present but rendered at a perfunctory level. Proposed solutions are present but are rendered at a perfunctory level. A conclusion is present but is rendered at a perfunctory level. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. Good (87.00%) A minimum of two theories discussed in the course are clearly presented in full to develop the case report. Discussion is convincing. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. Application of one or more theories to describe understanding of the problem or situation of focus is clearly present. Discussion is convincing and defines specific 10%elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. Application of one or more theories to the recommended intervention or solution being proposed is clearly present. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. Development of the case report across the entire scenario from problem through proposed solution is clearly present. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. A description of the evaluation of the selected research instrument is clearly present. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. An explanation of the tenets, rationale for selection, and clear application using the language of theory is clearly present. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. An introduction with problem statement is present, clear, and thorough. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. A brief literature review is clearly present in full. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. A description of the case, situation, or conditions is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. A detailed explanation of the synthesized literature findings is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. A case summary is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. Proposed solutions are clearly and thoroughly presented. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. A conclusion is clearly and thoroughly presented. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. Excellent (100.00%) A minimum of two theories discussed in the course are clearly presented in full to develop the case report. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. Application of one or more theories to describe understanding of the problem or situation of focus is clearly present. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. Application of one or more theories to the recommended intervention or solution being proposed is clearly present. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. Development of the case report across the entire scenario from problem through proposed solution is clearly present. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. A description of the evaluation of the selected research instrument is clearly present. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forwardthinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. An explanation of the tenets, rationale for selection, and clear application using the language of theory is clearly present. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. Comments An introduction with problem statement is clearly present. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. A brief literature review is clearly present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. A description of the case, situation, or conditions is clearly present. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. A detailed explanation of the synthesized literature findings is clearly present. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. A case summary is clearly present. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. Proposed solutions are clearly and thoroughly presented. Discussion is insightful, forward-thinking, and detailed. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. A conclusion is clearly and thoroughly presented. Discussion is insightful, forward-thinking, and detailed. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. All format elements are correct. In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. Points Earned
Purchase answer to see full attachment
