Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources Essay

/in /by

Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources Essay

Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources Essay

Develop a 2-4-page scholarly paper in which you describe a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis, and then identify and analyze credible evidence that could be used as the basis for applying EBP to the issue.

Introduction

The goal of using evidence-based research findings is to enhance safety and quality of patient care and ensure optimal outcomes are achieved. It is not uncommon to hear a nurse say, “why change it as we’ve always done it this way.” However, this is no longer acceptable in today’s practice environment. The profession of nursing has evolved, and the expectation is that the professional nurse has a scientific foundation to support the care that is provided. As the profession of nursing continues to evolve and engage in health care transformation, baccalaureate-prepared nurses are expanding taking on leadership roles that include incorporating EBPs. To be able to do this, the nurse needs to understand the criteria and makes a resource credible, as this is crucial when deciding if the research is valid and reliable for implementation into health care settings. The nurse will need to incorporate the use of evidence-based practice models. EBP models are designed to assist the nurse in developing a plan to gather evidence to answer a practice problem or question. It is a systematic approach to direct the user to incorporate scholarly findings into current practice. These EBP models lead the nurse through the decision-making process of evaluating the literature to determine the best practice evidence for the practice issue or question. Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources Essay

ORDER  A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER  NOW

It would be an excellent choice to complete the Vila Health Determining the Credibility of Evidence activity prior to developing the report. The activity is a media simulation that offers an opportunity to review a scenario and work on determining the credibility of presented evidence. These skills will be necessary to complete Assessment 2 successfully. This media simulation is one potential source of context on which to base your assessment submission. This will take just a few minutes of your time and is not graded.

Professional Context

As a baccalaureate-prepared nurse, you will be responsible for locating and identifying credible and scholarly resources to incorporate the best available evidence for the purposes of enhancing clinical reasoning and judgement skills. When reliable and relevant evidence-based findings are utilized, patients, health care systems, and nursing practice outcomes are positively impacted. Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources Essay

Scenario

For this assessment, you may choose from the following options as the context for the quality or safety issue or chosen diagnosis for researching and completing this assessment:

  • The specific diagnosis you identified in your previous assessment.
  • The simulation Vila Health: Determining the Credibility of Evidence.
  • A personal practice experience in which a sentinel event occurred.

Instructions

The purpose of this analysis is to better understand what constitutes credibility of journal articles as well as websites. The role of the baccalaureate-prepared nurse in incorporating evidence-based research continues to growth in clinical practice. As quality improvement (QI) measures to reduce safety risks continue to be emphasized, the need for evidence-based models and evidence-based templates is growing. This type of systematic approach to incorporating evidence-based findings allows nurses to make clinical and operational decisions based upon the best available evidence. When the most up-to-date evidence-based findings are utilized, patient-centered care improves outcomes and enhances the patient experience.

For this assessment:

  • Explain the criteria that should be used when determining the credibility of journal articles as well as websites.
  • Support your explanations with references to the literature or research articles that describe criteria that should be used to determine credibility.
    • Your identification and determination of credibility should be done within the context of your chosen scenario for this assessment. For example, if you choose to use the provided Vila Health scenario, your initial identification of resources should be of resources that will best help address the presented issue. However, if you are locating resources to help provide evidence-based care for the diagnosis you identified in the first assessment, you may want to begin your literature and evidence search from the databases that identified. Any of the three scenario options are acceptable. So, pick the one that most interests you. Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources Essay

Be sure to address the following in this assessment, which correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please study the scoring guide carefully so that you will know what is needed for a distinguished score.

  • Describe a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis, that could benefit from an evidence-based approach.
  • Explain criteria that should be considered when determining credibility of resources such as journal articles and websites.
  • Analyze the credibility and relevance of evidence and resources within the context of a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis.
    • This is where you are selecting the specific resources to help address the issue in your chosen scenario.
  • Explain the importance of incorporating credible evidence into an EBP model used to address a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis.
    • Selecting a model for evidence-based practice changes. [PDF]and Evidence-Based Practice Models help explain the various evidence-based nursing models.
  • Communicate using writing that is clear, logical, and professional with correct grammar and spelling using current APA style.

    ORDER  A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER  NOW

Additional Requirements

Your assessment should meet the following requirements:

  • Length of submission:2–4-page scholarly paper, this does not include the APA-formatted title page and reference list.
  • Number of references:Cite 3–5 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your findings and considerations. Resources should be no more than five years old.
  • APA formatting:References and citations are formatted according to current APA style.

Portfolio Prompt: Remember to save the final assessment to your ePortfolio so that you may refer to it as you complete the final capstone course.

Competencies Measured

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment scoring guide criteria:

  • Competency 2: Analyze the relevance and potential effectiveness of evidence when making a decision.
    • Explain criteria that should be considered when determining credibility of resources such as journal articles and websites.
    • Analyze the credibility and relevance of evidence and resources within the context of a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis.
  • Competency 3: Apply an evidence-based practice model to address a practice issue.
    • Explain the importance of incorporating credible evidence into an evidence-based practice model used to address a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis.
  • Competency 4: Plan care based on the best available evidence.
    • Describe a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis, that could benefit from an evidence-based approach.
  • Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly communication strategies to lead practice changes based on evidence.
    • Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.
    • Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format. Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources Essay

Presentation on Healthcare Improvement’s Triple Aim Assignment

/in /by

Presentation on Healthcare Improvement’s Triple Aim Assignment

Presentation on Healthcare Improvement’s Triple Aim

Description

  • Develop a presentation, containing 10-15 slides and 3-5 sources in APA format(reference in alphabetical order), on the Institute for Healthcare Improvement’s Triple Aim, how current and emerging health care models support the Triple Aim, and how governmental regulatory initiatives and outcome measures can be applied in the care coordination process to achieve the Triple Aim in a population.
  • PLEASE use scoring guide to ensure passing grade.

ORDER  A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER  NOW

 

  • INTRODUCTION

    The Triple Aim is a framework by the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (n.d.) for “simultaneously improving the health of the population, enhancing the experience and outcomes of the patient, and reducing per capita cost of care for the benefit of communities.” Care coordinators must have a model and framework to guide their practice and enable them to achieve the Triple Aim. Presently, many rural hospitals are using archaic models that must be updated to achieve the Triple Aim. For example, the patient-centered medical home model has been around for 30 years, but it has evolved during that time.This assessment provides an opportunity for you to develop an evidence-based presentation of the ways in which an organization’s care coordination process can be modified to achieve the Triple Aim.

    Models of Care

    National initiatives focus on health care organizations to continuously improve the quality, safety, and coordination of care. In response to these initiatives, health care models have surfaced with the goal to guide national health safety and quality improvement efforts. Nursing is an art and science with a foundation that embraces evidence, research, and quality. The thought “we have always done it this way” has long been discarded and replaced by standards based on evidence-based research. As the specialization of care coordination has evolved, care coordination has proven to be a vital element that links patients and families to safer and higher quality care. One care coordination model, the patient-centered medical home (PCMH), has gained momentum and support from governmental and regulatory agencies.

    Reference

    Institute for Healthcare Improvement. (n.d.). Triple Aim for populations. http://www.ihi.org/Topics/TripleAim/Pages/default….

    PREPARATION

    In this assessment, you will assume the role of a new case manager at a small rural hospital, Sacred Heart. You have been asked to deliver an evidence-based presentation to hospital leaders and clinical leadership teams about the ways in which the care coordination process at Sacred Heart can be modified to achieve the Triple Aim within the hospital’s rural population.To gain a better understanding of current health care models and their support for the Triple Aim, examine and compare such models as:

    • Patient-centered medical home (PCMH).
    • Transitional care.
    • Patient self-management.
    • Guided care.
    • Care coordination (Institute for Healthcare Improvement).

    Then, finish gathering the information needed to prepare for your presentation by completing the following simulation exercise:

    Note: Remember that you can submit all or a portion of your presentation to Smarthinking for feedback before you submit the final version of this assessment. If you plan on using this free service, be mindful of the turnaround time of 24–48 hours for receiving feedback.

    Presentation Software

    You may use Microsoft PowerPoint or any other suitable presentation software to create your slides. If you elect to use an application other than PowerPoint, check with faculty to avoid potential file compatibility issues. You are encouraged to review the various presentation resources provided for this assessment. These resources will help you to design an effective presentation, whether you choose to use PowerPoint or other presentation design software.

    ORDER  A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER  NOW

    INSTRUCTIONS

    Develop a presentation of specific suggestions for improving the care coordination process at Sacred Heart Hospital to achieve Triple Aim outcomes.

    Developing the Presentation

    The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Be sure that your presentation addresses each point, at a minimum. You may also want to read the Triple Aim Outcome Measures Scoring Guide to better understand how each criterion will be assessed.

    • Explain how the Triple Aim contributes to population health, improves the patient care experience, and reduces health care costs on a regional, state, and national level. You will do this on slides with these specific headings:
      • Experience of Care/Patient Satisfaction.
      • Improving Population or Community Health.
      • Decreasing Per Capita Costs.
    • Analyze the relationships between various current and emerging health care models you have chosen to examine and the ways in which they support the Triple Aim by answering these guiding questions:
      • How do I define the rationale and philosophy of these health care models?
      • Can I explain how these health care models have evolved? How do I believe that these health care models have changed over time?
      • Can I cite at least three ways in which health care quality is enhanced through these models? In which three ways do I believe that these models most enhance health care quality? (Cite references to support your assertion.)
    • Explain how the structure of these models contribute to the process of gathering and evaluating the quality of evidence-based data.
    • Explain how evidence-based data shapes the care coordination process in nursing.
    • Describe three governmental regulatory initiatives and outcome measures that can be applied in the care coordination process to achieve the Triple Aim within a population.
    • Present process improvement recommendations to a stakeholder group clearly and concisely.
      • Address the anticipated needs and concerns of your audience.
      • What questions or objections are they likely to raise? How will you respond?
    • Support your main points, arguments, and conclusions with relevant and credible evidence, correctly formatting citations and references using current APA style.
      • Is your supporting evidence clear and explicit?
      • How or why does particular evidence support a claim?
      • Will your audience see the connection?

    ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS

    PRESENTATION FORMAT AND LENGTH

    Your slide deck should consist of 10–15 slides that address the presentation criteria, not including the title slide, purpose slide, and references slide.

    • Begin your presentation with the following slides:
      • Title.
      • Purpose (the reasons for the presentation).
      • Definition of the Triple Aim outcome measures.
    • Use the speaker’s notes section of each slide to develop your talking points and cite your sources, as appropriate.

    SUPPORTING EVIDENCE

    • Cite 3–5 sources of credible scholarly or professional evidence to support your presentation.
    • List your sources on the references slide at the end of your presentation.
    • Apply APA formatting to all in-text citations and references.

    Portfolio Prompt: You may choose to save your presentation to your ePortfolio.

    COMPETENCIES MEASURED

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:

    • Competency 1: Apply care coordination models to improve the patient experience, promote population health, and reduce costs.
      • Explain how the Triple Aim contributes to population health, improves the patient care experience, and reduces health care costs on a regional, state, and national level.
      • Analyze the relationships between various current and emerging health care models and the ways in which they support the Triple Aim.
      • Explain how the structure of particular health care models contributes to the process of gathering and evaluating the quality of evidence-based data.
      • Describe governmental regulatory initiatives and outcome measures that can be applied in the care coordination process to achieve the Triple Aim within a population.
    • Competency 2: Explain the relationship between care coordination and evidence-based data.
      • Explain how evidence-based data shapes the care coordination process in nursing.
    • Competency 4: Communicate effectively with diverse audiences, in an appropriate form and style, consistent with applicable organizational, professional, and scholarly standards.

Population Health Policy Advocacy Letter Assignment

/in /by

Population Health Policy Advocacy Letter Assignment

Population Health Policy Advocacy Letter

Write a letter to the editor of an academic or professional journal. The length and format of the letter is dictated by your choice of journal.

INTRODUCTION

Note: Each assessment in this course builds on the work you completed in the previous assessment. Therefore, you must complete the assessments in this course in the order in which they are presented.

Advocating for new policies is an important aspect of the master’s-prepared nurse. For new policies to be compelling they need to be supported by evidence. Supporting data can be used to illustrate why new policies and interventions are needed to help address a specific health issue. Compelling data can help sway the stakeholders and gain support for your policy.

ORDER  A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER  NOW

Another aspect of advocacy is disseminating new policies and interventions outside of the immediate care environment. This can be done by reaching out to professional organizations as well as academic and professional journals. A letter to the editor is one strategy for disseminating information to a wider audience, and to potentially enlist support throughout the wider professional community.

PREPARATIONS

As you prepare to complete this assessment, you may want to think about other related issues to deepen your understanding or broaden your viewpoint. You are encouraged to consider the questions below and discuss them with a fellow learner, a work associate, an interested friend, or a member of your professional community. Note that these questions are for your own development and exploration and do not need to be completed or submitted as part of your assessment. You may use the Locating Letter Submission Guidelines for Journals library guide for additional assistance.

  • Looking at your health care issue from a prevention standpoint, what are the relevant levels of prevention?
    • What would be the benefits and challenges of applying a specific level of prevention to your chosen issue and population?
    • How might one or more approaches to prevention improve the care and outcomes?
      • How could your policy be leveraged, or revised, to support the relevant levels of prevention?
  • What are relevant strategies that you could use to help advocate for the policy you are proposing?
    • How could these strategies help you advocate for your policy proposal?
    • How does evidence from the literature support the benefits of your proposed policy?
      • How does citing evidence help lend credibility to your advocacy?
  • What academic or professional journal would be the best forum to advocate for your policy?
    • Why is your chosen journal an appropriate forum?
    • Which advocacy strategies would be most effective in this forum?
    • How will you craft your message to best appeal to the likely audience of your chosen journal?

Assessment 3 will build upon the work you have done for your previous two assessments. For this assessment, you will be writing a letter to the editor of an academic or professional journal as a means to advocate for adoption or development of policies that will improve the quality of care and outcomes around your chosen health care issue and vulnerable population. Refer to the resource listed below.

SCENARIO

Throughout this course, you have focused on a specific health issue occurring within a specific population. You researched position papers regarding this health concern, and you developed a health policy proposal to positively impact the health of the affected individuals. It is now time to reach a greater audience regarding your policy proposal.

ORDER  A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER  NOW

INSTRUCTIONS

Develop a letter to the editor of a peer-reviewed academic or professional nursing journal based on the policy proposal that you created for Assessment 2. Choose from one of the journals on the Ultimate List of Nursing Journals and go to that journal’s Web site to find out the requirements for submitting a letter to the editor, such as format requirements, topics, and word counts. Make sure you select a nursing journal that covers the topic about which you are going to write. If you want to use another journal that is not on this list, please make sure the journal does address health care, because this is the purpose of the assessment.

The goal of your letter is to be informative about the policy that you developed for Assessment 2, while also being persuasive about the need for and benefit of similar policies in other health care settings. The bullet points below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Be sure that your submission addresses all of them. You may also want to read the Letter to the Editor: Population Health Policy Advocacy Scoring Guide and Guiding Questions: Letter to the Editor: Population Health Policy Advocacy [DOC] document to better understand how each grading criterion will be assessed.

  • Evaluate the current state of the quality of care and outcomes for a specific issue in a target population.
    • Look back to the data or scenario you used in Assessment 1 to address this criterion.
  • Analyze how the current state of the quality of care and outcomes for a specific issue in a target population necessitates health policy development and advocacy.
  • Justify why a developed policy will be vital in improving the quality of care and outcomes for a specific issue in a target population.
  • Advocate for policy development in other care settings with regard to a specific issue in a target population.
  • Analyze the ways in which interprofessional aspects of a developed policy will support efficient and effective achievement of desired outcomes for the target population.
  • Communicate in a professional and persuasive manner, writing content clearly and logically with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling.
  • Integrate relevant sources to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using current APA style (or the journal’s preferred style).

Example Assessment: You may use the assessment example, linked in the Assessment Example section of the Resources, to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like.

ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS

The submission requirements for your editorial will depend on the journal you choose. To find out the requirements, go to the journal’s Web site. There should be a section regarding submissions that will address how to format letters to the editor, and whether there is a word count limit (there usually is a limit).

  • If the journal does not have submission guidelines for the number of resources required, use 3-5 sources.
  • To be sure that your instructor knows the submission and formatting requirements for your letter, include the journal’s guidelines on a separate page at the end of the document you submit for this assessment.

COMPETENCIES MEASURED

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:

  • Competency 1: Design evidence-based advanced nursing care for achieving high-quality population outcomes.
    • Evaluate the current state of the quality of care and outcomes for a specific issue in a target population.
    • Justify why a developed policy will be vital in improving the quality of care and outcomes for a specific issue in a target population.
  • Competency 2: Evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness of interprofessional interventions in achieving desired population health outcomes.
    • Analyze the ways in which interprofessional aspects of a developed policy will support efficient and effective achievement of desired outcomes for the target population.
  • Competency 3: Analyze population health outcomes in terms of their implications for health policy advocacy.
    • Analyze how the current state of the quality of care and outcomes for a specific issue in a target population necessitates health policy development and advocacy.
    • Advocate for policy development in other care settings with regard to a specific issue in a target population.
  • Competency 4: Communicate effectively with diverse audiences, in an appropriate form and style, consistent with organizational, professional, and scholarly standards.
    • Communicate in a professional and persuasive manner, writing content clearly and logically with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling.
    • Integrate relevant sources to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.

NHSFP4000 Medical Errors Annotated Bibliography

/in /by

NHSFP4000 Medical Errors Annotated Bibliography

NHSFP4000 Medical Errors Annotated Bibliography

Assessment 2 : Applying Research Skills

  • Create a 3-5-page annotated bibliography and summary based on your research related to best practices addressing one of the health care problems or issues in the Assessment Topic Areas media piece faced by a health care organization that is of interest to you. NHSFP4000 Medical Errors Annotated Bibliography

  • INTRODUCTION

    In your professional life you will need to find credible evidence to support your decisions and your plans of action. You will want to keep abreast of best practices to help your organization adapt to the ever-changing health care environment. Being adept at research will help you find the information you need. For this assessment, you will review the Assessment Topic Areas media piece and select one of the health care problems or issues to research a current health care problem or issue faced by a health care organization that is of interest to you.

    ORDER  A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER  NOW

    DEMONSTRATION OF PROFICIENCY

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:

    • Competency 1: Apply information literacy and library research skills to obtain scholarly information in the field of health care.
      • Identify academic peer-reviewed journal articles relevant to a health care problem or issue and describe the criteria used for the literature search.
    • Competency 2: Apply scholarly information through critical thinking to solve problems in the field of health care.
      • Assess the credibility and relevance of information sources.
      • Summarize what was learned from developing an annotated bibliography.
      • Analyze academic peer-reviewed journal articles using the annotated bibliography organizational format.
    • Competency 4: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and respectful of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others, and that is consistent with expectations for health care professionals.
      • Summarize a health care problem or issue and describe a personal interest in it and experience with it.
      • Write clearly and logically, with correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics.
      • Write following APA style for in-text citations, quotes, and references. NHSFP4000 Medical Errors Annotated Bibliography

    INSTRUCTIONS

    Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. At a minimum, be sure to address each point. In addition, you are encouraged to review the performance level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.For this assessment, you will research best practices related to a current health care problem. Your selected problem or issue will be utilized again in Assessment 3. To explore your chosen topic, you should use the first two steps of the Socratic Problem-Solving Approach to aid your critical thinking.

    1. View the Assessment Topic Areas | Transcript media piece and select one of the health care problems or issues in the media piece to research. Write a brief overview of the selected topic. In your overview:
      • Describe the health care problem or issue.
      • Describe your interest in the topic.
      • Describe any professional experience you have with this topic.
    2. Conduct a search for scholarly or academic peer-reviewed literature related to the topic and describe the criteria you used to search for articles, including the names of the databases you used.
      • You will want to access the applicable Undergraduate Library Research Guide related to your degree (found at the NHS Learner Success Lab) for tips to help you in your search.
      • Use keywords related to the health care problem or issue you are researching to select relevant articles.
    3. Assess the credibility of the information sources you find.
      • Determine if the source is from an academic peer-reviewed journal.
      • Determine if the publication is current.
      • Determine if information in the academic peer-reviewed journal article is still relevant.
    4. Select four current scholarly or academic peer-reviewed journal articles published during the past three to five years that relate to your topic.
    5. Explain the relevance of the information sources.
      • Describe how the health care problem or issue is addressed in each source.
      • Discuss what kind of contribution each source provides on your selected topic.
    6. Analyze the scholarly literature or academic peer-reviewed journal articles using the annotated bibliography organizational format.
      • The purpose of an annotated bibliography is to document a list of references along with key information about each one. The detail about the reference is the annotation. Developing this annotated bibliography will create a foundation of knowledge about the selected topic.
      • List the full reference for the source in APA format (author, date, title, publisher, et cetera) and use APA format for the annotated bibliography.
      • Make sure the references are listed in alphabetical order, are double-spaced, and use hanging indents.
      • Follow the reference with the annotation.
    7. In your annotation:
      • Identify the purpose of the article.
      • Summarize the source:
        • What are the main arguments?
        • What topics are covered?
      • Include the conclusions and findings of the article.
      • Write your annotation in a paragraph form. The annotation should be approximately 150 words (1 to 3 paragraphs) in length.
    8. In a separate paragraph or two at the end of the paper, summarize what you learned from your research.
      • List the main points you learned from your research.
      • Summarize the main contributions of the sources you chose and how they enhanced your knowledge about the topic.

    Example Assessment: You may use the following to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like:

    Additional Requirements
    1. Length: At least 3–5 typed, double-spaced pages, not including the title page and reference page.
    2. Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.
    3. APA Template: Use the APA template linked in the resources. Use the APA Style Paper Template [DOCX] as the paper format and the APA Style Paper Tutorial [DOCX] for guidance.
    4. Written communication: Write clearly and logically, with correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics.
    5. Content: Provide a title page and reference page following APA style.
    6. References: Use at least four scholarly or academic peer-reviewed journal articles.
    7. APA format: Follow current APA guidelines for in-text citation of outside sources in the body of your paper and also on the reference page.

    Note: Review the Applying Research Skills Scoring Guide for the grading criteria applied to this assessment.If you would like assistance in organizing your assessment, or if you simply have a question about your assessment, please do not hesitate to ask faculty or the teaching assistants in the NHS Learner Success Lab for guidance and suggestions.Note: Your instructor may also use the Writing Feedback Tool to provide feedback on your writing. In the tool, click the linked resources for helpful writing information. NHSFP4000 Medical Errors Annotated Bibliography

Assignment on Safety, Quality and Informatics

/in /by
Assignment on Safety, Quality and Informatics

Assignment on Safety, Quality and Informatics

Assessment Instructions

PREPARATION

As you prepare for this assessment, complete the following:

  1. Before you begin, examine your organization’s history of safety in a specific area and how your organization addresses patient safety issues. If possible, consult with a key stakeholder in the organization (such as an administrator) to better understand specific patient-safety concerns and how the organization is working to resolve the concerns. This person should also be able to discuss some of the organizational barriers impacting the patient safety issue.
  2. Next, look at the basic concepts, principles, and practices that contribute to organizational quality improvement and patient safety. Review the literature for best practices and how technology might be used to improve the issue. Assignment on Safety, Quality and Informatics
  3. Finally, be sure to consider the legal and ethical implications associated with the safety issue, as well as possible organizational barriers to change.

ORDER  A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER  NOW

 

DIRECTIONS

As you construct this assessment, address each point as completely as possible:

  • Describe a patient-safety issue within your organization, comparing the way your organization addresses the issue with the concepts, principles, and practices that contribute to quality improvement and patient safety.
  • Analyze the legal and ethical consequences of not addressing the issue.
  • Recommend evidence-based interventions, including technology, to address the patient-safety issue.
  • Describe strategies to overcome specific organizational barriers to change, based on your knowledge of the organization.

ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS

  • Format: Include a title page and reference page. Use APA style and formatting.
  • Length: Ensure your completed assessment is 8–10 pages in length, not including the title page and reference page.
  • References: Cite at least five current scholarly or professional resources.
  • Font: Use double-spaced, 12-point, Times New Roman font. Assignment on Safety, Quality and Informatics

Assessment description

/in /by

The purpose of this assignment is to discuss the value of monitoring project progress and evaluating outcomes to develop quality and safety initiatives. In a 750-900-word paper, address the following:

Discuss the value of monitoring the progress of planned change and the impact it has on project outcomes.
Explain the benefits of evaluating overall project outcomes.
Discuss the importance of final project analysis and debriefing following project closure.
Discuss who should be involved in the project debriefing.
Explain why it’s important to celebrate successful completion of a project.
How would you celebrate successful completion?
If all desired outcomes are not met in a project, describe the appropriate next steps.
Based on the case study in which you have applied the principles of project management to in Topics 3-8, develop at least two potential resulting quality and safety initiatives.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Benchmark Information

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competency:

MSN with an Emphasis in Health Care Quality and Patient Safety

6.2: Use process improvement principles to design quality and safety initiatives.

Assessment description

/in /by

The purpose of this assignment is to discuss the value of monitoring project progress and evaluating outcomes to develop quality and safety initiatives. In a 750-900-word paper, address the following:

Discuss the value of monitoring the progress of planned change and the impact it has on project outcomes.
Explain the benefits of evaluating overall project outcomes.
Discuss the importance of final project analysis and debriefing following project closure.
Discuss who should be involved in the project debriefing.
Explain why it’s important to celebrate successful completion of a project.
How would you celebrate successful completion?
If all desired outcomes are not met in a project, describe the appropriate next steps.
Based on the case study in which you have applied the principles of project management to in Topics 3-8, develop at least two potential resulting quality and safety initiatives.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Benchmark Information

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competency:

MSN with an Emphasis in Health Care Quality and Patient Safety

6.2: Use process improvement principles to design quality and safety initiatives.

Types of Illiteracy Multicultural Communication and Its Origins Questions

/in /by

Types of Illiteracy Multicultural Communication and Its Origins Questions

Write a 650-1300 word response to the following questions:

  1. Explain multicultural communication and its origins.
  2. Compare and contrast culture, ethnicity, and acculturation.
  3. Explain how cultural and religious differences affect the health care professional and the issues that can arise in cross-cultural communications.
  4. Discuss family culture and its effect on patient education.
  5. List some approaches the health care professional can use to address religious and cultural diversity.
  6. List the types of illiteracy.

    ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

  7. Discuss illiteracy as a disability.
  8. Give examples of some myths about illiteracy.
  9. Explain how to assess literacy skills and evaluate written material for readability.
  10. Identify ways a health care professional may establish effective communication.
  11. Suggest ways the health care professional can help a patient remember instructions.

 

Tags: compare and contrast patient education health care professional religious differences

discussion board

/in /by

discussion board

Chapter 10 Quality and Safety Copyright © 2015. F.A. Davis Company History and Overview • Historical trends and issues • Political influences • The Institute of Medicine (IOM) and the Committee on the Quality of Health Care in America Copyright © 2015. F.A. Davis Company Trends and Issues • • • • • • Economic Societal demographics and diversity Regulation and legislation Technology Health-care delivery and practice Environmental and globalization Copyright © 2015. F.A. Davis Company Statement of Quality of Care The IOM concluded that 1. Quality can be

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

defined and measured. 2. Quality problems are serious and extensive. 3. Current approaches to quality improvement are inadequate. 4. There is an urgent need for rapid change. Copyright © 2015. F.A. Davis Company Focus Areas of To Err Is Human The IOM recommended to • • • • Enhance knowledge and leadership regarding safety. Identify and learn from errors. Set performance standards and expectations for safety. Implement safety systems within health-care organizations. Copyright © 2015. F.A. Davis Company Crossing the Quality Chasm Conclusions • The gaps between actual care and high-quality care could be attributed to key interrelated areas in the health-care system. – The growing complexity of science and technology – An increase in chronic conditions. – A poorly organized delivery system of care and constraints on exploiting the revolution in information technology Copyright © 2015. F.A. Davis Company Ten Rules to Govern Health-Care Reform for the 21st Century 1. Care is based on a continuous healing relationship. 2. Care is provided based on patient needs and values. 3. The patient is the source of control of care. 4. Knowledge is shared and free-flowing. 5. Decisions are evidence-based. Copyright © 2015. F.A. Davis Company Ten Rules to Govern Health-Care Reform for the 21st Century (cont’d) 6. Safety as a system property. 7. Transparency is necessary; secrecy is harmful. 8. Anticipate patient needs. 9. Waste is continually decreased. 10.Cooperation between health-care providers. Copyright © 2015. F.A. Davis Company Quality in the Health-Care System • Quality improvement • Using CQI to monitor and evaluate quality of care • Quality improvement at the organizational and unit levels • Aspects of health care to evaluate • Risk management Copyright © 2015. F.A. Davis Company Quality The Institute of Medicine (IOM) defines quality as “the degree to which health services for individuals and populations increase the likelihood of desired health outcomes and are consistent with current and professional knowledge” (IOM, 2001, p. 232) Copyright © 2015. F.A. Davis Company Six Aims for Improving Quality in Health Care • Health care should be – Safe – Effective – Patient-centered – Timely – Efficient – Equitable Copyright © 2015. F.A. Davis Company QI vs. CQI • QI – Began with Florence Nightingale – Structured organizational process – Included evidence-based methods for gathering data and achieving goals • CQI – Purpose – Identify, collect data, analyze, evaluate, change – Responsibility Copyright © 2015. F.A. Davis Company Evaluation of Health Care • Structure • Process • Outcomes Copyright © 2015. F.A. Davis Company Risk Management • Service occurrence • Serious error • Sentinel event Copyright © 2015. F.A. Davis Company The Economic Climate in the Health-Care System • Economic perspective • Regulation and competition • Nursing labor market Copyright © 2015. F.A. Davis Company Factors Influencing Economic Climate • • • • Economic Regulation Competition Nursing labor market Copyright © 2015. F.A. Davis Company Safety in the U.S. Health-Care System • • • • Types of errors Error identification and reporting Developing a culture of safety Organizations, agencies, and initiatives supporting quality and safety in the healthcare system Copyright © 2015. F.A. Davis Company Types of Errors • • • • Diagnostic Treatment Preventive Other Copyright © 2015. F.A. Davis Company Types of Events • Near miss • Adverse • Accident Copyright © 2015. F.A. Davis Company Causes of Errors • • • • • Medication errors Falls Hand-off errors Diagnostic and surgical errors Health-care acquired infections Copyright © 2015. F.A. Davis Company The Nursing Shortage and Patient Safety • More acutely ill patients are in the hospital setting. • Decreased number of qualified nurses increases the chance of errors. • Short staffing and increased workload contribute to errors. Copyright © 2015. F.A. Davis Company Culture of Safety • • • • Roles of leadership, individuals, and teams Event reporting systems Methods Organizations, agencies, and initiatives Copyright © 2015. F.A. Davis Company Root Cause Analysis • Determine what influenced the consequences. • Establish tightly linked chains of influence. • At every level of analysis determine the necessary and sufficient influences. • Whenever feasible drill down to root causes. • Know that there are always multiple root causes. Copyright © 2015. F.A. Davis Company Health-Care System Reform • Role of nursing in system reform – The ANA’s Agenda – Influence of Nursing Copyright © 2015. F.A. Davis Company Role of Nursing in Health-Care Reform • American Nurse’s Association – Nursing’s agenda for health-care reform – ANA’s health-care agenda • You – Become informed – Plan – Take action! Copyright © 2015. F.A. Davis Company
Purchase answer to see full attachment

Capella University Evolution of the Hospital Industry Analysis Presentation

/in /by

Capella University Evolution of the Hospital Industry Analysis Presentation

Instructions

For this assessment, you will develop a PowerPoint presentation in which you trace the evolution of the U.S. hospital industry by comparing and contrasting hospital care in the 1800s, the 1960s, and today.

Imagine you are a patient with a serious illness in a hospital in the 1800s, in the 1960s, and today. Describe the process and type of care you would receive during these time periods.

Examine the following:

  • The hospital environment.
  • Who the care providers are, their level of education, and the level of care provided.
  • How you might pay for your care.
  • Some thoughts on how things were better or worse in these categories in each of the different time frames.

You might want to (but do not have to) organize your presentation using the following outline:

  • Slide 1: Title of the Presentation.
  • Slide 2: Brief explanation of the purpose of the presentation.
  • Slides 3–6: The Hospital Environment.
  • Slides 6–9: The Care Providers and Level of Care.
  • Slides 10–12: Paying for Your Care.
  • Slide 13–14: Conclusions.

PRESENTATION REQUIREMENTS

Your presentation should consist of:

  • A minimum of 12 bulleted slides.
  • Speaker notes that fully explain each slide.

    ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

  • A minimum of three references.
  • Appropriate APA citations and peer-reviewed references on each slide, as necessary.

GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR POWERPOINT

  • Keep the design simple.
  • Font: Arial or Verdana, size 24-point, minimum.
  • Keep the slides concise: 5–7 bullet points per slide and 5–7 words per bullet. Use speaker notes to explicate the bullets.
  • For best color contrast, use light text on dark background (for example, yellow on black, white on dark blue).
  • Use the proper slide layout. For example, if a slide has a title and text, it is created using the correct Title and Text layout.