In 2–3 pages, address the following:
• Explain your state laws for involuntary psychiatric holds for child and adult psychiatric emergencies. Include who can hold a patient and for how long, who can release the emergency hold, and who can pick up the patient after a hold is released. |
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
The response includes a thorough and well-organized explanation of student’s state laws for involuntary psychiatric holds for child and adult emergencies. |
12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
The response includes an accurate explanation of student’s state laws for involuntary psychiatric holds for child and adult emergencies. |
11 (11%) – 11 (11%)
The response includes a somewhat vague or inaccurate explanation of student’s state laws for involuntary psychiatric holds for child and adult emergencies. |
0 (0%) – 10 (10%)
The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of student’s state laws for involuntary psychiatric holds for child and adult emergencies. Or the response is missing. |
• Explain the differences among emergency hospitalization for evaluation/psychiatric hold, inpatient commitment, and outpatient commitment in your state. |
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of the differences among emergency hospitalization for evaluation/psychiatric hold, inpatient commitment, and outpatient commitment in your state. |
12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
The response includes a well-organized explanation of the differences among emergency hospitalization for evaluation/psychiatric hold, inpatient commitment, and outpatient commitment in your state. |
11 (11%) – 11 (11%)
The response includes a somewhat vague explanation of the differences among emergency hospitalization for evaluation/psychiatric hold, inpatient commitment, and outpatient commitment in your state. |
0 (0%) – 10 (10%)
The response includes a vague explanation of the differences among emergency hospitalization for evaluation/psychiatric hold, inpatient commitment, and outpatient commitment in your state. Or the response is missing. |
• Explain the difference between capacity and competency in mental health contexts. |
9 (9%) – 10 (10%)
The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of the difference between capacity and competency in mental health contexts. |
8 (8%) – 8 (8%)
The response includes an accurate explanation of the difference between capacity and competency in mental health contexts. |
7 (7%) – 7 (7%)
The response includes a somewhat vague or incomplete explanation of the difference between capacity and competency in mental health contexts. |
0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of the difference between capacity and competency in mental health contexts. Or the response is missing. |
• Select one of the following topics and explain one legal issue and one ethical issue related to this topic that may apply within the context of treating psychiatric emergencies: patient autonomy, EMTALA, confidentiality, HIPAA privacy rule, HIPAA security rule, protected information, legal gun ownership, career obstacles (security clearances/background checks), and payer source. |
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
The response accurately and concisely explains one legal and one ethical issue related to the selected topic, within the context of treating psychiatric emergencies. |
12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
The response accurately explains one legal and one ethical issue related to the selected topic, within the context of treating psychiatric emergencies. |
11 (11%) – 11 (11%)
The response somewhat vaguely or innacurately explains one legal and one ethical issue related to the selected topic, within the context of treating psychiatric emergencies. |
0 (0%) – 10 (10%)
The response vaguely or innacurately explains one legal and one ethical issue related to the selected topic, within the context of treating psychiatric emergencies. Or, response is missing. |
•Identify one evidence-based suicide risk assessment that you could use to screen patients. Attach a copy or a link to the assessment you identified. |
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
The response identifies and explains an appropriate, evidence-based suicide risk assessment that could be used to screen patients. A copy of or a link to the assessment is included. |
12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
The response identifies an appropriate, evidence-based suicide risk assessment that could be used to screen patients. A copy of or a link to the assessment is included. |
11 (11%) – 11 (11%)
The risk assessment identified is somewhat inappropriate for the intended use or dated. A copy of or a link to the assessment may be missing. |
0 (0%) – 10 (10%)
The risk assessment identified is inappropriate for the intended use, not evidence based, or dated. Or, response is missing. |
• Identify one evidence-based violence risk assessment that you could use to screen patients. Attach a copy or a link to the assessment you identified. |
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
The response identifies and explains an appropriate, evidence-based violence risk assessment that could be used to screen patients. A copy of or a link to the assessment is included. |
12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
The response identifies an appropriate, evidence-based violence risk assessment that could be used to screen patients. A copy of or a link to the assessment is included. |
11 (11%) – 11 (11%)
The risk assessment identified is somewhat inappropriate for the intended use or dated. A copy of or a link to the assessment may be missing. |
0 (0%) – 10 (10%)
The risk assessment identified is inappropriate for the intended use, not evidence based, or dated. Or, response is missing. |
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria. |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.
A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria. |
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.
Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet they are brief and not descriptive. |
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time.
Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic. |
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.
No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided. |
Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:
Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors |
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains 1-2 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors |
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains 3-4 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors |
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains five or more grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding |
Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct APA format with no errors |
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains 1-2 APA format errors |
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains 3-4 APA format errors |
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains five or more APA format errors |
Total Points: 100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|