approach to care of cancer
approach to care of cancer
Course Code NRS-410V Class Code NRS-410V-O501 Criteria Content Percentage 80.0% Explanation of the Diagnosis
ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW
and Staging of Cancers is Provided. 30.0% At Least Three Complications of Cancer are Identified With Comprehensive Discussion of Available Treatments. 20.0% Provides Recommendations to Address Physiological and Psychological Side Effects of Care. 30.0% Organization and Effectiveness 15.0% Thesis Development and Purpose 5.0% Paragraph Development and Transitions 5.0% Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Format 5.0% Paper Format (1- inch margins; 12-point-font; double-spaced; Times New Roman, Arial, or Courier) 2.0% Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment) 3.0% Total Weightage 100% Approach to Care Unsatisfactory 0-72% (0.00%) An explanation of the diagnosis and staging of cancers is not provided. Less than three complications of cancer are identified. Recommendations to address physiological and psychological side effects of care are lacking. Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. Organization is disjointed. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. No reference page is included. No citations are used. 100.0 Less Than Satisfactory 72-75% (75.00%) An explanation of the diagnosis and staging of cancers is provided but is missing relevant information. At least three complications of cancer are identified but lacking a comprehensive discussion of available treatments. Recommendations to address physiological and psychological side effects of care are missing relevant information. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. Satisfactory 76-79% (79.00%) An explanation of the diagnosis and staging of cancers is provided that meets the assignment criteria. At least three complications of cancer are identified with a comprehensive discussion of available treatments. Recommendations to address physiological and psychological side effects of care meet the assignment criteria. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. Good 80-89% (89.00%) An explanation of the diagnosis and staging of cancers is provided that is offered in a detailed manner. More than three complications of cancer are identified with a comprehensive discussion of available treatments. Recommendations to address physiological and psychological side effects of care are offered in a detailed manner. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and GCU style is usually correct. Excellent 90-100% (100.00%) An explanation of the diagnosis and staging of cancers is provided that is offered in a detailed manner, while demonstrating higher level or critical thinking. More than three complications of cancer are identified with a comprehensive discussion of available treatments, while demonstrating higher level or critical thinking. Recommendations to address physiological and psychological side effects of care are offered in a detailed manner, while demonstrating higher level or critical thinking. Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. Comments All format elements are correct. In-text citations and a reference page are complete. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. Points Earned
Purchase answer to see full attachment
