Assignment: Reassessment of clinical Strengths and Opportunities

Welcome to the last week of your practicum! Now that you have completed and recorded all of your clinical hours, and you have been evaluated, you can reflect on the practicum experience as a whole. What challenged you or surprised you? What is one clinical activity or patient outcome that you are particularly proud of? Active and regular reflection is a way to “check in” with yourself and the progress toward your goals. Critical reflection should not only uncover opportunities for improvement but celebrate your successes. Assignment: Reassessment of clinical Strengths and Opportunities

ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED SOLUTION PAPERS

This week, you engage in reflection when you reassess your clinical strengths and opportunities for improvement.

Learning Objectives
Students will:

Assess strengths and opportunities for improvement related to clinical skills and procedures
Evaluate progress toward clinical practice goals
Learning Resources

Required Readings (click to expand/reduce)
Assignment: Reassessment of Strengths and Opportunities
Photo Credit: Jakub Jirsák – stock.adobe.com

There is a saying that “people must look back in order to look forward.” As you transition out of this practicum, finish your program, and look forward to your career beyond the program, you must “look back” at all that you have accomplished, taking stock of your skill and confidence levels before moving on.

For this Assignment, you return to your Week 1 Self-Assessment to gain a new perspective on what you need to do moving forward.

ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED SOLUTION PAPERS

To prepare:

Review your completed Clinical Skills and Procedures Self-Assessment Form from Week 1, as well as the record of procedures you have performed throughout the practicum.  Assignment: Reassessment of clinical Strengths and Opportunities
Assignment (1 page)

Perform a new self-assessment. Rate yourself on clinical skills, based on your experiences during this practicum. Summarize the results.
Explain which goals you accomplished and which you did not. If you did not achieve a particular goal, explain how you could continue to work on it after you complete your program, as you advance and grow in your career.
By Day 7
Submit your completed Assignment.

Rubric Detail

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.

Content
Name: PRAC_6565_Week11_Assignment_Rubric
Assignment: Reassessment of Strengths and Opportunities
Grid View
List View
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Perform a new self-assessment, rating yourself on clinical skills based on your experiences during this practicum. Summarize the results.
Points Range: 40.5 (40.5%) – 45 (45%)
The response provides an accurate, clear, and complete summary.
Points Range: 36 (36%) – 40 (40%)
The response provides an accurate summary. Assignment: Reassessment of clinical Strengths and Opportunities
Points Range: 31.5 (31.5%) – 35.5 (35.5%)
The response provides a somewhat vague, inaccurate, or incomplete summary.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 31 (31%)
The response provides a vague, inaccurate, or incomplete summary, or the summary is missing.
Explain which goals you accomplished and which you did not. If you did not achieve a particular goal, explain how you could continue to work on it after you complete your program, as you advance and grow in your career.
Points Range: 36 (36%) – 40 (40%)
The response accurately and thoroughly explains in detail which goals were accomplished and which were not. Full explanation is provided for how to continue working on goals. Assignment: Reassessment of clinical Strengths and Opportunities
Points Range: 32 (32%) – 35 (35%)
The response accurately explains which goals were accomplished and which were not. Explanation is provided for how to continue working on goals.
Points Range: 28 (28%) – 31 (31%)
The response somewhat vaguely or inaccurately explains which goals were accomplished and which were not. Vague explanation is provided for how to continue working on goals.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 27 (27%)
The response vaguely or inaccurately explains which goals were accomplished and which were not, or explanation is missing. Vague explanation is provided for how to continue working on goals, or explanation is missing.
Written Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.

Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. Assignment: Reassessment of Strengths and Opportunities
A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.

Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.
Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.

Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Assignment: Reassessment of Strengths and Opportunities
Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time.
No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.

Written Expression and Formatting—English writing standards:
Student uses correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.

Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains one or two (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
Written Expression and Formatting:
The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct APA format with no errors.
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a one or two (1 or 2) APA format errors. Assignment: Reassessment of clinical Strengths and Opportunities
Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
Total Points: 100
Name: PRAC_6565_Week11_Assignment_Rubric
Assignment: Reassessment of Strengths and Opportunities

Infrastructure and Technology Upgrade Plan Assignment

You are the Director at a public health facility in a remote town and have been awarded a S1.5 million-dollar grant to update the infrastructure at your facility. This will include upgrades to the technology to be able to provide services to a higher percentage of the population.

Address the following requirements:

Discuss in a strategic plan of action the steps and measures you will take to achieve this outcome.

Further, discuss in detail, the technology and tools that you would integrate into the planning infrastructure and the intended uses and benefits of these tools and technology. Infrastructure and Technology Upgrade Plan Assignment

Be sure to discuss the individuals responsible for implementing and overseeing each step of the process.

ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED SOLUTION PAPERS

should meet the following requirements:

Four-to-five pages in length, not including the title or reference pages.

Formatted per APA 7th edition and Saudi Electronic University standards.

Provide support for your work with in-text citations from a minimum of six scholarly articles.

Provide full APA references for the sources used on a reference page, along with appropriate in-text citations.

Utilize headings to organize the content in your work. Infrastructure and Technology Upgrade Plan Assignment

HCM520 Critical Thinking Writing Rubric – Module 3

Exceeds Expectation

Meets Expectation Below Expectation Limited Evidence

Content, Research, and Analysis

21-25 Points 16-20 Points 11-15 Points 6-10 Points

Requirements Exceeds Expectation – Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

Meets Expectation – Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

Below Expectation – Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

Limited Evidence – Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

21-25 Points 16-20 Points 11-15 Points 6-10 Points

Content Exceeds Expectation – Demonstrates substantial and extensive knowledge of the materials, with no errors or major omissions.

Meets Expectation – Demonstrates adequate knowledge of the materials; may include some minor errors or omissions.

Below Expectation – Demonstrates fair knowledge of the materials and/or includes some major errors or omissions.

Limited Evidence – Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials and/or includes many major errors or omissions. Infrastructure and Technology Upgrade Plan Assignment

25-30 Points 19-24 Points 13-18 Points 7-12 Points

Analysis Exceeds Expectation – Provides strong thought, insight, and analysis of concepts and applications.

Meets Expectation – Provides adequate thought, insight, and analysis of concepts and applications.

Below Expectation – Provides poor thought, insight, and analysis of concepts and applications.

Limited Evidence – Provides little or no thought, insight, and analysis of concepts and applications.

13-15 Points 10-12 Points 7-9 Points 4-6 Points

Sources Exceeds Expectation – Sources go above and beyond required criteria, and are well chosen to provide effective substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

Meets Expectation – Sources meet required criteria and are adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

Below Expectation – Sources meet required criteria, but are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

Limited Evidence – Source selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient.

Mechanics and Writing

5 Points 4 Points 3 Points 1-2 Points

Demonstrates college-level proficiency in

Exceeds Expectation – Project is clearly

Meets Expectation – Project is fairly well organized and

Below Expectation – Project is poorly organized and

Limited Evidence – Project is not organized or well

HCM520 Critical Thinking Writing Rubric – Module 3

organization, grammar and style. Infrastructure and Technology Upgrade Plan Assignment

organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; contains no errors in grammar, spelling, APA style, or APA citations and references.

written, and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; may include a few minor errors in grammar, spelling, APA style, or APA citations and references.

written, and may not follow proper format as outlined in the assignment. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development, and/or includes numerous or major errors in grammar, spelling, APA style, or APA citations and references.

written, and is not in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar, spelling, APA style, and APA citations and references.

Total points possible = 100. Infrastructure and Technology Upgrade Plan Assignment