PSYC 6717: Foundation and Philosophy of Behavior Analysis

PSYC 6717: Foundation and Philosophy of Behavior Analysis

Week 1: Introduction to Applied Behavior Analysis

This week, you will examine the foundations of applied behavior analysis. You consider operant conditioning and how it has affected your life, and you will analyze behavior analysis scenarios and identify the applied behavioral characteristic involved in each scenario. You will also complete a module test to demonstrate your understanding of these critical concepts.

ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED SOLUTION PAPERS

Learning Objectives

Students will:

  • Analyze principles of operant conditioning
  • Apply principles of behavioral theory to human behavior
  • Demonstrate understanding of basic concepts and principles of applied behavior analysis (ABA) PSYC 6717: Foundation and Philosophy of Behavior Analysis

Learning Resources

Required Readings

Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2020). Applied behavior analysis (3rd ed.). Pearson.

  • Chapter 1, “Definition and Characteristics of Applied Behavior Analysis” (pp. 2–24)
  • Chapter 2, “Basic Concepts and Principles” (pp. 25–46) PSYC 6717: Foundation and Philosophy of Behavior Analysis

Document: Behavioral Consequences Scenario Worksheet (Word document)

Required Media

Walden University, LLC. (2021). Introduction to applied behavior analysis [Video]. Walden University Blackboard. https://class.waldenu.edu

 

Note: This media program is approximately 39 minutes.

Walden University, LLC. (2021). Becoming a board certified behavior analyst [Video]. Walden University Blackboard. https://class.waldenu.edu

 

Note: This media program is approximately 56 minutes.

Walden University, LLC. (2021). Your VCS [Video]. Walden University Blackboard. https://class.waldenu.edu

Note: This media program is approximately 52 minutes.Walden University, LLC. (2021). Operant conditioning terms [Interactive media]. Walden University Blackboard. https://class.waldenu.edu PSYC 6717: Foundation and Philosophy of Behavior Analysis


Discussion: Operant Conditioning

 

Photo Credit: Destina – stock.adobe.com

Throughout your life, you have been conditioned to respond to certain stimuli in certain ways. This is known as operant conditioning. Operant conditioning is the type of learning in which the consequences of a behavior influence whether an individual will act in the same way in the future.

Even if there was not a clear behavior plan, the principles of operant conditioning have helped shape your life. In operant conditioning, you learn the relationship between your own behavior and reinforcing or punishing consequences from your environment. You may also learn conditions (antecedents) where consequences are more or less likely to occur.

For this Discussion, you will analyze the fundamental principles of operant conditioning and how it has impacted your life. Additionally, you analyze how behavioral psychological theory (e.g., antecedents, reinforcements, punishment) is applied to condition behavior PSYC 6717: Foundation and Philosophy of Behavior Analysis. As you read this week’s Learning Resources, try to identify times in your life when operant conditioning clearly played a part in your learning.

To Prepare

  • Consider how terminology of operant conditioning relates to specific behaviors.
  • Think about how your parents reinforced or punished you when you were growing up, and how those acts influenced how you behaved.
  • Consider how situations in your life today contribute to your behavior. Are you more or less likely to do something when a certain person is around?
  • Review the interactive media in the Learning Resources, “Operant Conditioning Terms.”

By Day 4 of Week 1

Post a description of a scenario that illustrates the application of operant conditioning in your life and explain how behavioral theory (e.g., antecedents, reinforcements, punishment) was applied to condition behavior in the scenario you posted. Explain how the antecedent condition facilitated or inhibited the target behavior discussed.

Read your colleagues’ postings.

Note: For this discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by clicking on the To Participate in this Discussion link, then select Create Thread to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click on Submit, you cannot delete or edit your own posts, and cannot post anonymously PSYC 6717: Foundation and Philosophy of Behavior Analysis. Please check your post carefully before clicking on Submit!

By Day 6 of Week 1

Respond to at least two colleagues’ posts in one of the following ways:

  • Expand on each colleague’s explanation of how they applied behavioral theory to their scenario.
  • Offer your perspective(s) on whether you agree or disagree with each colleague’s explanation of how the antecedent condition facilitated or inhibited the target behavior discussed. PSYC 6717: Foundation and Philosophy of Behavior Analysis

Be sure to support your posts and responses with specific references to behavior-analytic theory and research. In addition to the Learning Resources, search the Walden Library and/or internet for peer-reviewed articles to support your posts and responses. Use proper APA format and citations, including those in the Learning Resources.

Return to this Discussion in a few days to read the responses to your initial posting. Note what you have learned and/or any insights that you have gained because of your colleagues’ comments.

Submission and Grading Information

To access your rubric:

Week 1 Discussion Rubric

Post by Day 4 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 1

To participate in this Discussion:

Week 1 Discussion


Assignment: Application of Behavioral Theory

Photo Credit: magele-picture – stock.adobe.com

To effectively determine best methods for behavior change, the professional behavior analyst needs to develop a strong understanding of how to analyze the situation, including the target behavior, antecedent conditions, and consequences for the behavior. Understanding the terms and phrases used in applied behavior analysis is critical to appropriately evaluate a situation and determine effective methods for behavior change PSYC 6717: Foundation and Philosophy of Behavior Analysis.

One of the most frequently misused terms in psychology is “negative reinforcement.” Many people use this term to describe punishment because it “sounds better.” In behavioral psychology, terms are sometimes used differently than they are in everyday language. For example, the term “reinforcement” means that the rate of a behavior is increased. The term “punishment” means the rate of a behavior is decreased. The term “positive” means a stimulus is presented, and the term “negative” means a stimulus is removed. Therefore, negative reinforcement occurs when an aversive stimulus is removed, which results in an increase in probability of the behavior it followed.

For this Assignment, you will explore the application of behavioral theory. You will review a set of scenarios, analyze and identify the applied behavioral characteristic involved in the scenario, and explain how the scenario meets the definition of the characteristic you identified.

To Prepare

  • Review the Learning Resources for this week, including the required weekly media programs.
  • Review the “Behavioral Consequences Scenario Worksheet” found in the Learning Resources. You will use this worksheet to complete the Assignment. PSYC 6717: Foundation and Philosophy of Behavior Analysis

Assignment (1–2 pages)

Complete the Behavioral Consequences Scenario Worksheet. To complete the worksheet, do the following for each scenario:

  • Identify and define the following consequences used in applied behavior analysis in each scenario (i.e., positive reinforcement, negative reinforcement, positive punishment, negative punishment).
  • Explain how each scenario meets the definition of the applied behavior analysis characteristic you identified. Within your explanation, identify each of the components of the definition within the scenario PSYC 6717: Foundation and Philosophy of Behavior Analysis.

Be sure to support your Assignment with specific references to behavior-analytic theory and research. In addition to the Learning Resources, search the Walden Library and/or the internet for peer-reviewed articles to support your Assignment. Use proper APA format and citations, including those in the Learning Resources. 

By Day 7 of Week 1

Submit the Behavioral Consequences Scenario Worksheet.

Submission and Grading Information

To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

  • Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK1Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
  • Click on the Week 1 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
  • Click on the Week 1 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
  • Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK1Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click on Open.
  • If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database PSYC 6717: Foundation and Philosophy of Behavior Analysis.
  • Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:

Week 1 Assignment Rubric

Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

Submit your Week 1 Assignment draft and review the originality report.

Submit Your Assignment by Day 7

To submit your Assignment:

Week 1 Assignment


Module 1 Test: Introduction to Applied Behavior Analysis

 

 

Photo Credit: Alexey Novikov / Adobe Stock

Each module in this course provides fundamental information in a critical area of applied behavior analysis. At the end of each module, you will take a test to demonstrate your understanding of the topics covered.

This week’s Test assesses your knowledge of the assigned course readings and material introducing you to applied behavior analysis.

To Prepare

  • Review the Learning Resources and consider how these resources will guide your understanding of applied behavior analysis as you prepare for your Module 1 Test.

Test Instructions

  • This Test consists of 10 multiple-choice or true/false questions.
  • Each question is worth one point PSYC 6717: Foundation and Philosophy of Behavior Analysis.
  • Questions are presented in a random order.
  • This Test allows you to go back to check or change your answers at any point during your allotted Test time.
  • You may use your course readings and other resources to help you. This Test is open book.
  • You will have unlimited time to finish this Test by the end of the week.
  • You must pass the Test at 90% for competency.
  • Once the Test has been submitted, the correct answer will be indicated when you have given an incorrect answer.
  • If you need to retake the Test, a new Test will be generated. PSYC 6717: Foundation and Philosophy of Behavior Analysis

By Day 7 of Week 1

Submit your Test by Day 7.

Submission Information

Complete the Test by Day 7 of Week 1

To complete your Test:

Module 1 Test


Week in Review

This week, you were introduced to the fundamentals of applied behavior analysis. You reflected on how operant conditioning has affected your life, and you analyzed a set of scenarios to identify the applied behavior analysis characteristic being used. You also completed the Module Test to demonstrate your understanding of these critical concepts.

Next week, you will begin the next module of this course, Module 2: Philosophical Underpinnings. In the first week of Module 2, you will examine assumptions of behavior analysis and why they are important for a behavior analyst.

Next Module

Module 2: Philosophical Underpinnings

In the first module of this course, you were introduced to the fundamentals of applied behavior analysis (ABA). In particular, you focused on the concepts and terminology of operant conditioning and practiced applying behavioral theory to a set of scenarios.

Module 2 builds on this foundation by examining a common set of philosophical assumptions that characterize and apply to the science of ABA. Understanding these philosophical underpinnings provides a scientific basis from which to inform the methods you use to effect behavioral changes and positively impact learning PSYC 6717: Foundation and Philosophy of Behavior Analysis.

Additionally, you will explore the three branches of behavior analysis—behaviorism, experimental analysis of behavior (EAB), and applied behavior analysis (ABA)—and consider their contribution to the field. In particular, you will examine psychologist B. F. Skinner’s philosophy of radical behaviorism as it relates to learning and the influence of the environment on behavior PSYC 6717: Foundation and Philosophy of Behavior Analysis. You will study the seminal dimensions of behavior analysis put forth by researchers Baer, Wolf, and Risley and evaluate their application to the practice of behavior analysis. Finally, you will apply the philosophical underpinnings to your analysis of a behavior-analytic intervention designed to address an applied concern.

Go to the Weekly Content

 

Week 2: Philosophical Assumptions of Behavior Analysis

This is the first week of Module 2: Philosophical Underpinnings. During this week, you will analyze assumptions of behavior for behavior analysts. You will further focus on the assumption known as the Law of Parsimony and consider how, as a behavior analyst, you could apply this behavioral assumption when communicating behavior-analytic interventions to a parent or teacher. 

Learning Objectives

Students will:

  • Analyze the assumptions of behavior analysis
  • Analyze the Law of Parsimony as it relates to a real-life application

Learning Resources

Required Readings

Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2020). Applied behavior analysis (3rd ed.). Pearson.

  • Chapter 1, “Definition and Characteristics of Applied Behavior Analysis” (pp. 2–24)
    (Previously read in Week 1)

Required Media

Walden University, LLC. (2021). Philosophical assumptions of behavior analysis [Video]. Walden University Blackboard. https://class.waldenu.edu PSYC 6717: Foundation and Philosophy of Behavior Analysis

 

Note: This media program is approximately 59 minutes.


Discussion: Philosophical Assumptions

Photo Credit: esoxx – stock.adobe.com

The behavior of the scientists of applied behavior analysis is characterized by a set of philosophical assumptions and attitudes of science. They guide the work of the behavior analyst, including their investigations, strategic approaches, and interpretations of findings.

For this Discussion, you will analyze six assumptions and attitudes of behavior analysis discussed in the Learning Resources—determinism, empiricism, experimentation, replication, parsimony, and philosophic doubt. You will also consider examples of how the assumptions apply to the study of behavior.

To Prepare

  • Review the Learning Resources for this week as well as the required weekly media program to gain an understanding of the philosophical assumptions that inform the practice of behavior analysis.
  • Consider examples of how the philosophical assumptions apply to the study of human behavior.
  • Review the interactive media in the Learning Resources, “Six Assumptions or Attitudes of Behavior Analysis.”

By Day 4 of Week 2

The behavior of scientists, including behavior analysts, is characterized by a common set of assumptions: determinism, empiricism, experimentation, replication, parsimony, and philosophic doubt.

Post two of these assumptions and give an example of how each applies to the study of human behavior.

Read your colleagues’ postings.

Note: For this discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by clicking on the To Participate in this Discussion link, then select Create Thread to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click on Submit, you cannot delete or edit your own posts, and cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking on Submit!

By Day 6 of Week 2

Respond to at least two colleagues’ posts by expanding on each of their explanations of how the assumptions they identified in their examples apply to the study of human behavior PSYC 6717: Foundation and Philosophy of Behavior Analysis.

Be sure to support your posts and responses with specific references to behavior-analytic theory and research. In addition to the Learning Resources, search the Walden Library and/or internet for peer-reviewed articles to support your posts and responses. Use proper APA format and citations, including those in the Learning Resources.

Return to this Discussion in a few days to read the responses to your initial posting. Note what you have learned and/or any insights that you have gained because of your colleagues’ comments.

Submission and Grading Information

To access your rubric:

Week 2 Discussion Rubric

Post by Day 4 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 2

To participate in this Discussion:

Week 2 Discussion


Assignment: Parsimony

Photo Credit: iushakovsky – stock.adobe.com

For this week’s Discussion, you examined a common set of assumptions characterizing the behavior of behavior analysts. One of those assumptions is the Law of Parsimony. The history and etymology of the word parsimony is from the Latin pars-, meaning “to act sparingly, be thrifty (with), refrain from” (Merriam-Webster, n.d.). By extension, the Law of Parsimony posits that given two explanations for a given phenomenon, you should choose the simplest scientific explanation that fits the evidence.

Ultimately, an important purpose for using parsimonious interpretations is to enable a principle of economy when determining where new findings might incorporate into the existing knowledge base of a given field. By way of illustration, consider the following review regarding negative symptoms in schizophrenia. In the review, the authors identify a lengthy list of nearly 20 negative schizophrenia symptoms ranging from different forms of affect issues to poor grooming to asociality. Applying the law of parsimony (referred to as Occam’s Razor in the review) the authors simplified their evidence by stating, “…we propose that while negative symptoms are varied and broad in both their clinical presentation and longitudinal course, they can all be subsumed under the concept of avolition. As the primary construct, avolition translates to decreased functional performance, a hallmark of schizophrenia’s longer-term outcome but identifiable in its earliest stages” (Foussias, & Remington, 2010).

For this Assignment, you will consider why parsimony is an important construct a behavior analyst might use when communicating interventions to a parent or teacher.

References:
Foussias, G., & Remington, G. (2010). Negative symptoms in schizophrenia: Avolition and Occam’s razor. Schizophrenia Bulletin36(2), 359–369. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbn094
Merriam-Webster. (n.d.). Parsimony. Retrieved February 6, 2021, from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/parsimony

To Prepare:

  • Review this week’s Learning Resources about parsimony PSYC 6717: Foundation and Philosophy of Behavior Analysis.
  • Consider practical ways parsimony might be used by a behavior analyst.

Assignment (1 page)

  • Write an explanation addressing why parsimony is important for a behavior analyst when communicating a prospective intervention to a parent or teacher. Be parsimonious in your response.

Be sure to support your Assignment with specific references to behavior-analytic theory and research. In addition to the Learning Resources, search the Walden Library and/or the internet for peer-reviewed articles to support your Assignment. Use proper APA format and citations, including those in the Learning Resources. 

By Day 7 of Week 2

Submit your Assignment.

Submission and Grading Information

To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

  • Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK2Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
  • Click on the Week 2 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
  • Click on the Week 2 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
  • Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK2Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click on Open.
  • If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
  • Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:

Week 2 Assignment Rubric

Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

Submit your Week 2 Assignment draft and review the originality report.

Submit Your Assignment by Day 7

To submit your Assignment:

Week 2 Assignment


Week in Review

This week, you examined six assumptions and attitudes of behavior analysis. You analyzed and applied the Law of Parsimony to how a behavior analyst might use it when communicating a proposed behavioral intervention.

Next week, you will examine the principles of B. F. Skinner’s radical behaviorism. You will evaluate the effectiveness and appropriateness of radical behaviorism using specific instances in your own life experience that seem to be consistent with Skinner’s learning principles PSYC 6717: Foundation and Philosophy of Behavior Analysis.

Week 3: Radical Behaviorism

In his own words, psychologist and behaviorist B. F. Skinner explained radical behaviorism as, “the philosophy of a science of behavior treated as a subject matter in its own right apart from internal explanations, mental or physiological” (p. 122). PSYC 6717: Foundation and Philosophy of Behavior Analysis

This week focuses on the principles of radical behaviorism. You will examine the history of behaviorism and how the development of Skinner’s radical behaviorism was a significant departure from the historical conceptual systems of behaviorism preceding its emergence. Using the principles of radical behaviorism, you will consider your own life experiences, or life experiences you have observed in others, that seem to exemplify Skinner’s learning principles and employ your judgment regarding their effectiveness and appropriateness.

Reference:
Skinner, B. F. (1989). Recent issues in the analysis of behavior. Merrill.

Learning Objectives

Students will:

  • Evaluate radical behaviorism
  • Evaluate the principles of radical behaviorism to one’s life and behaviors

Learning Resources

Required Readings

Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2020). Applied behavior analysis (3rd ed.). Pearson.

  • Chapter 1, “Definition and Characteristics of Applied Behavior Analysis” (pp. 2–24)

(Previously read in Week 1) PSYC 6717: Foundation and Philosophy of Behavior Analysis

Moore, J. (2011). Behaviorism. The Psychological Record, 61(3), 449–463. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395771

Credit Line: Behaviorism by Moore, J., in The Psychological Record, Vol. 61/ Issue 3. Copyright 2011 by Denison University. Reprinted by permission of Denison University via the Copyright Clearance Center. Licensed in 2021.

Required Media

Walden University, LLC. (2021). Radical behaviorism [Video]. Walden University Blackboard. https://class.waldenu.edu

 

Note: This media program is approximately 42 minutes.

 

Discussion: Behaviorism

 

Photo Credit: Vitezslav Vylicil – stock.adobe.com

One skill of an applied behavior analyst is collaborating to identify negative behaviors an individual is exhibiting and then developing treatments for those behaviors (e.g., strategies, interventions, etc.) to help them change the behaviors and derive improved outcomes for themselves. Radical behaviorism posits there is a science of behavior that has shown the environment as a significant cause of behavior and that experiential factors play a primary role in determining behavior (Cooper et al., 2020). The strategies and interventions of the applied behavior analyst represent efforts to change maladaptive behavior by systematically employing techniques that control circumstances in which negative behaviors arise and helping individuals learn and apply new skills.

ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED SOLUTION PAPERS

For example, if a child in a classroom is repeatedly leaving their seat during instruction (i.e., maladaptive behavior), an applied behavior analyst would work with the child to identify the factors contributing to the maladaptive behavior and then develop strategies or interventions to generate more appropriate behavior by the child.

For this week’s Discussion, you will consider your perspectives on radical behaviorism and its learning principles.

Reference:
Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2020). Applied behavior analysis (3rd ed.). Pearson. 

To Prepare

  • Review the Learning Resources for this week as well as the required weekly media program to gain an understanding of radical behaviorism.
  • Think about whether you concur with the learning principles of radical behaviorism. PSYC 6717: Foundation and Philosophy of Behavior Analysis

By Day 4 of Week 3

Post an explanation of whether you agree or disagree with the following statement, and why or why not:

  • Skinner’s “radical behaviorism” proposes that behavior, rather than cognitive processes, should be the primary topic of study.

Read your colleagues’ postings.

Note: For this discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by clicking on the To Participate in this Discussion link, then select Create Thread to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click on Submit, you cannot delete or edit your own posts, and cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking on Submit!

By Day 6 of Week 3

Respond to at least two colleagues’ posts by expanding on each colleague’s rationale for why they agree or disagree with Skinner’s proposal. Justify your response.

Be sure to support your posts and responses with specific references to behavior-analytic theory and research. In addition to the Learning Resources, search the Walden Library and/or internet for peer-reviewed articles to support your posts and responses. Use proper APA format and citations, including those in the Learning Resources.

Return to this Discussion in a few days to read the responses to your initial posting. Note what you have learned and/or any insights that you have gained because of your colleagues’ comments.

Submission and Grading Information

To access your rubric:

Week 3 Discussion Rubric

Post by Day 4 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 3

To participate in this Discussion:

Week 3 Discussion


Assignment: Behaviorism

 

Photo Credit: Monkey Business – stock.adobe.com

In this week’s Learning Resources you read about Skinner’s radical behaviorism. Skinner’s learning principles can be applied in the areas of behavior management and education. For example, “reinforcement” is one of Skinner’s learning principles and refers to anything that increases the likelihood a response will recur. In a classroom, this learning principle can be seen in the form of a “token economy,” whereby the teacher awards tokens immediately after a desirable behavior as a technique to reinforce the desirable behavior and decrease undesirable behavior. The tokens can later be exchanged for a meaningful item or privilege.

For this Assignment, you will describe specific instances in your own life experiences, or life experiences you have observed in others, that seem to be consistent with Skinner’s learning principles and use your own judgment to evaluate their effectiveness and appropriateness PSYC 6717: Foundation and Philosophy of Behavior Analysis.

To Prepare:

  • Review the Learning Resources for this week to gain an understanding of the learning principles of Skinner’s radical behaviorism, including the weekly media video and the interactive media, “Skinner’s Radical Behaviorism.
  • Identify at least two specific instances in your own life experiences, or life experience you have observed in others, that seem to be consistent with Skinner’s learning principles, either from the behavior management side (e.g., reinforcement, extinction, time out, token economies) or from the educational side (e.g., behavioral objectives, self-paced learning).

Assignment (1–2 pages)

Write a description of at least two specific instances in your own life experience, or life experiences you have observed in others, that seem to be consistent with Skinner’s learning principles. These can be either from the behavior management side (e.g., reinforcement, extinction, time out, token economies) or from the educational side (e.g., behavioral objectives, self-paced learning). Briefly describe these instances and comment on their effectiveness and appropriateness (in your judgment).

Be sure to support your Assignment with specific references to behavior-analytic theory and research. In addition to the Learning Resources, search the Walden Library and/or internet for peer-reviewed articles to support your Assignment. Use proper APA format and citations, including those in the Learning Resources.  PSYC 6717: Foundation and Philosophy of Behavior Analysis

By Day 7 of Week 3

Submit your Assignment.

Submission and Grading Information

To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

  • Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK3Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
  • Click on the Week 3 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
  • Click on the Week 3 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
  • Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK3Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click on Open. PSYC 6717: Foundation and Philosophy of Behavior Analysis
  • If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
  • Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:

Week 3 Assignment Rubric

Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

Submit your Week 3 Assignment draft and review the originality report.

Submit Your Assignment by Day 7

To submit your Assignment:

Week 3 Assignment


Week in Review

This week, you examined the principles of B. F. Skinner’s radical behaviorism. You evaluated the effectiveness and appropriateness of radical behaviorism using specific instances in your own life experience that seemed to be consistent with Skinner’s learning principles.

Next week, you will examine the three branches of behavior analysis and provide examples of how each branch contributes to the practice of behavior analysis. Additionally, you will analyze your professional motivations for pursuing a course of study that will lead to your becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA).

Next Week

Week 4: Science of Behavior Analysis

The science of behavior analysis is made up of three domains: behaviorism (philosophy), experimental analysis of behavior (basic research), and applied behavior analysis (applied practice and research). These domains are interrelated; therefore, an understanding of applied behavior analysis (ABA) must consider the context of the philosophy of behaviorism and the foundational research traditions and findings of the experimental analysis of behavior.

This week, you will examine the similarities and differences between the three domains of the science of behavior analysis as well as how each contribute to the practice of behavior analysis. Additionally, you will analyze your personal motivations and goals for studying behavior analysis and earning your Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA)  certification.

Learning Objectives

Students will:

  • Analyze professional motivations for becoming a BCBA
  • Analyze similarities and differences between behaviorism, experimental analysis of behavior (EAB), and applied behavior analysis (ABA) PSYC 6717: Foundation and Philosophy of Behavior Analysis

Learning Resources

Required Readings

Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2020). Applied behavior analysis (3rd ed.). Pearson.

  • Chapter 1, “Definition and Characteristics of Applied Behavior Analysis” (pp. 2–24)

(Previously read in Week 1)

Required Media

Walden University, LLC. (2021). Science of behavior analysis [Video]. Walden University Blackboard. https://class.waldenu.edu

 

Note: This media program is approximately 53 minutes.


Discussion: Applied Behavior Analysis

Photo Credit: GoodIdeas / Adobe Stock

You have made a significant decision to further your formal education in the field of applied behavior analysis. You likely have an interest in behaviors and their relationship with the environment and a desire to learn and apply behavioral techniques that will help individuals achieve beneficial behavioral change. While applied behavior analysts work with individuals of different ages, the skills of an applied behavior analyst are especially needed with children with autism.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2020) reports that autism spectrum disorders (ASD) affect 1 in 54 children, representing a tripling of the prevalence rate since 2000. The respected and specialized behavior analysis assessment and intervention strategies you employ in your role as an applied behavior analyst can help autistic children and others with developmental issues to learn new skills and meet behavioral challenges.

For this Discussion, you will analyze your decision to embark on a course of study that will lead to your becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA) PSYC 6717: Foundation and Philosophy of Behavior Analysis.

Reference:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2020). Prevalence of autism spectrum disorder among children aged 8 years — autism and developmental disabilities monitoring network, 11 sites, United States, 2016.Surveillance Summaries69(4), 1–12. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/ss/ss6904a1.htm

To Prepare

  • Reflect on what motivated you to pursue a course of study that will lead to your becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA).
  • Consider what professional goals you will have once you earn your BCBA.

By Day 4 of Week 4

Post a reflection addressing the following:

  • What led you to decide to study behavior analysis?
  • What experience do you have in behavior analysis?
  • What work do you hope to do once you earn your BCBA and how might this impact your desire for positive social change?

Read your colleagues’ postings.

Note: For this discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by clicking on the To Participate in this Discussion link, then select Create Thread to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click on Submit, you cannot delete or edit your own posts, and cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking on Submit!

By Day 6 of Week 4

Respond to at least two colleagues’ posts by providing your perspectives on their professional goals once they earn their BCBA.

Be sure to support your posts and responses with specific references to behavior-analytic theory and research. In addition to the Learning Resources, search the Walden Library and/or the internet for peer-reviewed articles to support your posts and responses. Use proper APA format and citations, including those in the Learning Resources.

Return to this Discussion in a few days to read the responses to your initial posting. Note what you have learned and/or any insights that you have gained because of your colleagues’ comments.

Submission and Grading Information

To access your rubric:

Week 4 Discussion Rubric

Post by Day 4 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 4

To participate in this Discussion:

Week 4 Discussion


Assignment: The Science of Behavior Analysis

Photo Credit: gustavofrazao – stock.adobe.com

The field of behavior analysis comprises three separate yet overlapping and related branches: behaviorism, experimental analysis of behavior (EAB), and applied behavior analysis (ABA). The theories, procedures, and practices of each of the three branches should inform one another PSYC 6717: Foundation and Philosophy of Behavior Analysis. Because behavior analysis is a science, it necessarily seeks to identify and implement behavioral treatment strategies and interventions in the real world that are grounded in both the philosophy and research from the field and with the ultimate goal of improving behavioral outcomes for the client.

For this Assignment, you will define each of the three branches of behavior analysis and analyze their similarities and differences. You will also provide examples of how each branch contributes to the practice of behavior analysis

To Prepare:

  • Review the Learning Resources for this week, including the video and interactive media, “Branches of Behavior Analysis,” to gain an understanding of the three branches of behavior analysis.
  • Consider the relationships between the three branches of behavior analysis and how they contribute to the practice.

Assignment (1–2 pages)

Define of each of the three branches of behavior analysis: behaviorism, experimental analysis of behavior (EAB), and applied behavior analysis (ABA). Then, clarify the similarities and differences by giving examples of how each contributes to the practice of behavior analysis.

Be sure to support your Assignment with specific references to behavior-analytic theory and research. In addition to the Learning Resources, search the Walden Library and/or the internet for peer-reviewed articles to support your Assignment. Use proper APA format and citations, including those in the Learning Resources.  PSYC 6717: Foundation and Philosophy of Behavior Analysis

By Day 7 of Week 4

Submit your Assignment.

Submission and Grading Information

To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

  • Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK4Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
  • Click on the Week 4 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
  • Click on the Week 4 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
  • Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK4Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click on Open.
  • If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
  • Click on the Submit button to complete your submission. PSYC 6717: Foundation and Philosophy of Behavior Analysis
Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:

Week 4 Assignment Rubric

Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

Submit your Week 4 Assignment draft and review the originality report.

Submit Your Assignment by Day 7

To submit your Assignment:

Week 4 Assignment


Week in Review

This week you examined the three branches of behavior analysis and provided examples of how each branch contributes to the practice of behavior analysis. Additionally, you analyzed your professional motivations for pursuing a course of study that will lead to your becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA).

Next week, you will analyze the seven dimensions of behavior analysis proposed by Baer, Wolf, and Risley in their seminal article, “Some Current Dimensions of Applied Behavior Analysis,” and provide examples of how each apply to the practice of behavior analysis. You will also evaluate the relevance of the seven dimensions of behavior analysis to the practice of behavior analysis today PSYC 6717: Foundation and Philosophy of Behavior Analysis.

Next Week

Week 5: Dimensions of Applied Behavior Analysis

In their seminal article, Baer et al. (1968) elucidate the differences between applied and non-applied (theoretical) research, stating “. . . applied research is constrained to examining behaviors which are socially important, rather than convenient for study. It also implies, very frequently, the study of those behaviors in their usual social settings, rather than in a “laboratory” setting” (p. 92). They expand on these differences by identifying seven dimensions of applied behavior analysis (ABA) that are indicators of how ABA represents a science of behavior analysis.

This week, you will examine the seven dimensions of applied behavior analysis identified by Baer, Wolf, and Risley in their seminal 1968 article and evaluate the relevance and practical application of the dimensions in the 21st century.

Reference:
Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1(1), 91–97. PSYC 6717: Foundation and Philosophy of Behavior Analysis

Learning Objectives

Students will:

  • Evaluate the relevance of the Baer, Wolf, and Risley’s dimensions of behavior analysis to the practice of behavior analysis in the 21st century
  • Analyze Baer, Wolf, and Risley’s dimensions of behavior analysis

Learning Resources

Required Readings

Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2020). Applied behavior analysis (3rd ed.). Pearson.

  • Chapter 1, “Definition and Characteristics of Applied Behavior Analysis” (pp. 2–24)

(Previously read in Week 1) PSYC 6717: Foundation and Philosophy of Behavior Analysis

Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1(1), 91–97. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1968.1-91

 

Credit Line: Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis by Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R., in Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, Vol. 1/ Issue 1. Copyright 1968 by Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. Reprinted by permission of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior via the Copyright Clearance Center. Licensed in 2021.

Required Media

Walden University, LLC. (2021). Dimensions of applied behavior analysis [Video]. Walden University Blackboard. https://class.waldenu.edu

 

Note: This media program is approximately 30 minutes.

 

Discussion: Baer, Wolf, and Risley (1968)

Photo Credit: utah51 / Adobe Stock

Applied behavior analysis is a movement that began in the late 1950s within the field of experimental analysis of behavior (EAB) and was based on B. F. Skinner’s operant conditioning principles. As the applied orientation began to develop, it focused on practical interventions and applied topics relevant to socially significant behavior. This focus represented an incongruity with the criteria and research questions representing basic theoretical research and analysis in the field of contemporary applied psychology PSYC 6717: Foundation and Philosophy of Behavior Analysis. This incongruity grew enough to demonstrate a need for a journal focused on the increasingly popular applied orientation.

In 1967, the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis (JABA) was launched to address the need. The editors of the journal included Donald Baer, Montrose M. Wolf, and Todd Risley, who in the first issue of the JABA journal contributed an article that proposed criteria that would come to inform the application of concepts of applied behavior analysis. It also served to provide guidance to researchers seeking to be published in the journal. As indicated by the title of their seminal 1968 article, “Some Current Dimensions of Applied Behavior Analysis,” Baer, Wolf, and Risley proposed seven criteria, or dimensions, of applied behavior analysis (Baer et al., 1968).

For this Discussion, you will reflect on the seminal article by Baer et al. (1968), located in this week’s Learning Resources, and evaluate the relevance of the seven dimensions of behavior analysis in the article to the practice of behavior analysis today. You will also identify your most important takeaway from the article. PSYC 6717: Foundation and Philosophy of Behavior Analysis

Reference:
Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1(1), 91–97 PSYC 6717: Foundation and Philosophy of Behavior Analysis.

To Prepare

  • From the Learning Resources for this week, review the seminal Baer, Wolf, and Risley article and consider how the information applies to applied behavior analysis today.

By Day 4 of Week 5

Post what makes the information in the Baer, Wolf, and Risley article relevant to the practice of Applied Behavior Analysis today, more than 50 years later as well as what is the most important thing you learned from this article and how might this information impact your future professional work as a behavior analyst.

Read your colleagues’ postings.

Note: For this discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by clicking on the To Participate in this Discussion link, then select Create Thread to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click on Submit, you cannot delete or edit your own posts, and cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking on Submit!

By Day 6 of Week 5

Respond to at least two colleagues’ posts in one of the following ways:

  • Expand on their explanation of what makes the information in the Baer, Wolf, and Risley article relevant to the practice of Applied Behavior Analysis today, more than 50 years later.
  • Offer additional insights regarding the most important thing they learned from the article and its potential impact on their future professional work as a behavior analyst PSYC 6717: Foundation and Philosophy of Behavior Analysis.

Be sure to support your posts and responses with specific references to behavior-analytic theory and research. In addition to the Learning Resources, search the Walden Library and/or the internet for peer-reviewed articles to support your posts and responses. Use proper APA format and citations, including those in the Learning Resources.

Return to this Discussion in a few days to read the responses to your initial posting. Note what you have learned and/or any insights that you have gained because of your colleagues’ comments.

Submission and Grading Information

To access your rubric:

Week 5 Discussion Rubric

Post by Day 4 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 5

To participate in this Discussion:

Week 5 Discussion


Assignment: Dimensions of Applied Behavior Analysis

Photo Credit: DedMityay / Adobe Stock

Baer et al. (1968) suggest that for a science to be considered truly applied behavior analysis it must demonstrate the seven dimensions of being applied, behavioral, analytic, technological, conceptually systematic, effective, and display generality. These dimensions define the parameters of a scientifically based intervention. When designing the intervention, it should be consistent with research-based principles of applied behavior analysis. The behaviors receiving the intervention should be socially important to the individual and individual’s family and conducted in real-world settings PSYC 6717: Foundation and Philosophy of Behavior Analysis.

The techniques of an intervention should be explicitly identified and described in enough detail that others could replicate it. It should include an evaluative component defining what data you will collect and analyze in order to evaluate whether an intervention is working and whether the desired behavioral change is generalizable across different environments and time. PSYC 6717: Foundation and Philosophy of Behavior Analysis In effect, the data must demonstrate a reliable, functional relationship between the intervention and desired behavioral change.

For this Assignment, you will analyze each of the seven dimensions of applied behavior analysis and provide examples of how each applies to the practice of behavior analysis.PSYC 6717: Foundation and Philosophy of Behavior Analysis

Reference:
Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1(1), 91–97.

To Prepare:

  • Review the Learning Resources for this week, particularly those describing the dimensions of applied behavior analysis proposed by Baer, Wolf, and Risley.
  • Consider how you think each dimension might apply to the practice of behavior analysis.
  • Review the interactive media in the Learning Resources, “Dimensions of Applied Behavior Analysis.”

Assignment (1–2 pages)

Explain what Baer, Wolf, and Risley meant when they said each of the following criteria must be present for applied behavior analysis to be considered a science. Give an example of how each applies to the practice of behavior analysis.

  • applied
  • behavioral
  • analytic
  • technological
  • conceptually systematic
  • effective
  • capable of appropriately generalized outcomes

Be sure to support your Assignment with specific references to behavior-analytic theory and research. In addition to the Learning Resources, search the Walden Library and/or the internet for peer-reviewed articles to support your Assignment. Use proper APA format and citations, including those in the Learning Resources PSYC 6717: Foundation and Philosophy of Behavior Analysis. 

By Day 7 of Week 5

Submit your Assignment.

Submission and Grading Information

To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

  • Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK5Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
  • Click on the Week 5 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
  • Click on the Week 5 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
  • Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK5Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click on Open.
  • If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
  • Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:

Week 5 Assignment Rubric

Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

Submit your Week 5 Assignment draft and review the originality report.

Submit Your Assignment by Day 7

To submit your Assignment:

Week 5 Assignment

Week 6: Applications of Philosophical Underpinnings

In this course, you have explored philosophical underpinnings of applied behavior analysis, specifically selectionism, determinism, empiricism, parsimony, and pragmatism. As a practitioner of applied behavior analysis, you may be asking the question, “Why should I care about theory and philosophy?”

This week, you will examine current behavior analytic literature containing an intervention to address an applied concern and identify the philosophical underpinnings represented in that literature PSYC 6717: Foundation and Philosophy of Behavior Analysis. You will also confirm your understanding of the philosophical underpinnings of applied behavior analysis in the Module 2 Test.

Learning Objectives

Students will:

  • Evaluate philosophical underpinnings of behavior analysis
  • Demonstrate understanding of philosophical underpinnings of behavior analysis

Learning Resources

Required Readings

Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2020). Applied behavior analysis (3rd ed.). Pearson.

  • Chapter 1, “Definition and Characteristics of Applied Behavior Analysis” (pp. 2–24)
  • Chapter 2, “Basic Concepts and Principles” (pp. 25–46)
    (Previously read in Week 1)

Required Media

Walden University, LLC. (2021). Applications of philosophical underpinnings [Video]. Walden University Blackboard. https://class.waldenu.edu

 

Note: This media program is approximately 39 minutes.

 

Discussion: Applications of Philosophical Underpinnings

Photo Credit: Sensay – stock.adobe.com

Have you ever wondered why it is relevant to understand the theory and philosophy that underpins the field of behavior analysis? In this week’s Learning Resources, Fryling (2013) discusses some ways behavior analytic theory and philosophy are relevant to the practice of applied behavior analysis. He focuses on its unique features of having a natural science perspective as well as comprehensive, integrated components. The natural science perspective of behavior analysis requires its constructs come from observable, socially significant events, as opposed to hypothetical constructs prevalent in mentalistic, traditional psychology and other helping professions.

Comprehensive, integrated components are a feature in behavior analysis demonstrated by the coordinated interdependence between behavior analytic theory and philosophy, experimental analysis of behavior (EAB), applied behavior analysis (ABA), and delivery of behavioral services.

Attention to the systemic, natural science approach and the coordinated integration of the components of behavior analysis are what distinguish it as a unique field and underpin the rationale for behavior analytic interventions. Because a behavior analyst will typically collaborate with other professionals who adhere to hypothetical constructs that can be anti-behavioral in nature, it is especially important that they be grounded in the theory and philosophy of behavioral analysis in order to effectively represent those ways of thinking about behavior PSYC 6717: Foundation and Philosophy of Behavior Analysis.

In his book, Radical Behaviorism for ABA Practitioners, James M. Johnston provides the following reasons ABA practitioners should understand the philosophical underpinnings of their field (Graff, 2014):

Practitioners work at the interface between science and society and, therefore, must be able to bridge the gap between scientific and everyday understandings of how behavior works.

Most people’s beliefs about how behavior works conflict with established scientific findings.

Practitioners must be able to convince clients and other professionals to support objectives and procedures shown in the ABA literature to be effective.

Understanding radical behaviorism helps ensure consistency between the field’s science and the resulting technology.

Understanding radical behaviorism helps avoid conceptual backsliding that might be encouraged by everyday language. (p. 3)

In this Discussion, you will identify an article you retrieved from the behavior analytic literature (2012 to the present) that describes an intervention to address an applied concern. For the article you select, you will then evaluate how each of the following philosophical underpinnings of behavior analysis are represented: selectionism, determinism, empiricism, parsimony, and pragmatism PSYC 6717: Foundation and Philosophy of Behavior Analysis.

Reference:
Graff, R. B. (2014). A review of radical behaviorism for ABA practitioners by James M. Johnston [Review of the book Radical behaviorism for ABA practitioners, by J. M. Johnston]. APBA Reporter, 50, 1–3.

To Prepare

  • Review the Learning Resources for this week in order to gain an understanding of the following philosophical underpinnings of applied behavior analysis: selectionism, determinism, empiricism, parsimony, and pragmatism.
  • Identify an article retrieved from the behavior analytic literature (2012 to the present) that describes an intervention to address an applied concern.
  • Review the interactive media in the Learning Resources, “Philosophical Underpinnings of Behavior Analysis.”

By Day 4 of Week 6

Post the title of the article you selected and provide a brief summary of the article. Next, include your evaluation of each philosophical underpinning of behavior analysis for the article, including selectionism, determinism, empiricism, parsimony, and pragmatism. Make sure to include a reference and link to your article. Use proper APA format and style. PSYC 6717: Foundation and Philosophy of Behavior Analysis

Read your colleagues’ postings.

Note: For this discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by clicking on the To Participate in this Discussion link, then select Create Thread to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click on Submit, you cannot delete or edit your own posts, and cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking on Submit!

By Day 6 of Week 6

Respond to at least two colleagues’ posts by expanding on each colleague’s explanation of how the article does or does not represent each of the philosophical underpinnings of behavior analysis. Provide examples.

Be sure to support your posts and responses with specific references to behavior-analytic theory and research. In addition to the Learning Resources, search the Walden Library and/or the internet for peer-reviewed articles to support your posts and responses. Use proper APA format and citations, including those in the Learning Resources.

Return to this Discussion in a few days to read the responses to your initial posting. Note what you have learned and/or any insights that you have gained because of your colleagues’ comments. PSYC 6717: Foundation and Philosophy of Behavior Analysis

Submission and Grading Information

To access your rubric:

Week 6 Discussion Rubric

Post by Day 4 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 6

To participate in this Discussion:

Week 6 Discussion


Module 2 Test: Philosophical Underpinnings

Photo Credit: Alexey Novikov / Adobe Stock

Each module in this course provides fundamental information in a critical area of applied behavior analysis. At the end of each module, you will take a test to demonstrate your understanding of the topics covered.

This week’s Test assesses your knowledge of the assigned course readings and material regarding philosophical underpinnings of applied behavior analysis.

To Prepare

  • Review the Learning Resources for each week of Module 2 and consider how these resources will help guide you through your understanding of philosophical underpinnings of applied behavior analysis as you prepare for your Module 2 Test.

Test Instructions

  • This Test consists of 50 multiple-choice or true/false questions.
  • Each question is worth one point. PSYC 6717: Foundation and Philosophy of Behavior Analysis
  • Questions are presented in a random order.
  • This Test allows you to go back to check or change your answers at any point during your allotted Test time.
  • You may use your course readings and other resources to help you. This Test is open book.
  • You will have unlimited time to finish this Test by the end of the week.
  • You must pass the Test at 90% for competency.
  • Once the Test has been submitted, the correct answer will be indicated when you have given an incorrect answer.
  • If you need to retake the Test, a new Test will be generated.

By Day 7 of Week 6

Submit your Test by Day 7.

Submission Information

Complete the Test by Day 7 of Week 6

To complete your Test:

Module 2 Test


Week in Review

This week was the final week of Module 2: Philosophical Underpinnings. In it, you examined the philosophical underpinnings of a behavior-analytic intervention designed to address an applied concern. You also completed your end-of-module Test, in which you confirmed your understanding of the philosophical underpinnings of applied behavior analysis.

Next week, you will begin Module 3: Concepts and Principles I. You will examine terminology and concepts related to behavior and the environment, focusing specifically on examples of behavior, response, and response class from your own behavioral repertoire.

Next Module

 


Week in Review

This week, you analyzed the seven dimensions of behavior analysis proposed by Baer, Wolf, and Risley in their seminal article, “Some Current Dimensions of Applied Behavior Analysis,” and you provided examples of how each apply to the practice of behavior analysis. You also evaluated the relevance of the seven dimensions of behavior analysis to the practice of behavior analysis today PSYC 6717: Foundation and Philosophy of Behavior Analysis.

Next week, you will examine how philosophical underpinnings of applied behavior analysis are represented in current behavior analytic literature. You will also confirm your understanding of the philosophical underpinnings of applied behavior analysis in the Module 2 Test.

 

 

Week 7: Behavior and Environment

Have you ever observed yourself, or someone you know, avoiding a task? Perhaps the task was avoided instead by texting a friend, getting something to eat, or hitting the snooze button on an alarm clock. Those behaviors represented specific instances of behavior, or responses. And while they took different forms, they all had a function; that is, they were all used to affect the environment in the same way—avoiding the task.

In this initial week of Module 3: Concepts and Principles I, you will examine terminology and concepts related to behavior and the environment, focusing specifically on examples of behavior, response, and response class from your own behavioral repertoire.

Learning Objectives

Students will:

  • Identify behavior, response, and response class in behavioral examples
  • Analyze real-life behaviors that represent a response class

Learning Resources

Required Readings

Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2020). Applied behavior analysis (3rd ed.). Pearson.

  • Chapter 2, “Basic Concepts and Principles” (pp. 25–46)

(Previously read in Week 1)

Required Media

Walden University, LLC. (2021). Behavior and environment [Video]. Walden University Blackboard. https://class.waldenu.edu

 

Note: This media program is approximately 43 minutes.

 

Discussion: Behavior and Environment

Photo Credit: Joaquin Corbalan – stock.adobe.com

“Behavior analysis is characterized by a functional analysis of the effects of the behavior on the environment. A response class is a group of responses with the same function (that is, each response in the group produces the same effect on the environment)” (Cooper et al., 2020, p. 27) PSYC 6717: Foundation and Philosophy of Behavior Analysis.

The infographic below provides three examples of response class. For example: scream, throw, hit head, and name call are specific instances of behavior, or responses. Because they are a group of responses intended to produce the same effect on the environment—attention—the response class is attention. PSYC 6717: Foundation and Philosophy of Behavior Analysis

In this Discussion, you will consider your own behavioral repertoire and identify and define examples of behavior, response, and response class.

Reference:
Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2020). Applied behavior analysis (3rd ed.). Pearson.

To Prepare

  • Review the Learning Resources for this week, including the required weekly media, to gain an understanding of the relationship between behavior and environment, and related terminology.
  • Consider your own behavioral repertoire and identify examples of behavior, response, and response class. Review the interactive media in the Learning Resources, “Response and Response Class.”

By Day 4 of Week 7

Post a definition and an example of each of the following from your own behavioral repertoire:

  • Behavior
  • Response
  • Response Class

Read your colleagues’ postings.

Note: For this discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by clicking on the To Participate in this Discussion link, then select Create Thread to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click on Submit, you cannot delete or edit your own posts, and cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking on Submit!

By Day 6 of Week 7

Respond to at least two colleagues’ posts by expanding on their examples of behavior, response, and response class.

Be sure to support your posts and responses with specific references to behavior-analytic theory and research. In addition to the Learning Resources, search the Walden Library and/or internet for peer-reviewed articles to support your posts and responses. Use proper APA format and citations, including those in the Learning Resources.

Return to this Discussion in a few days to read the responses to your initial posting. Note what you have learned and/or any insights that you have gained because of your colleagues’ comments. PSYC 6717: Foundation and Philosophy of Behavior Analysis

Submission and Grading Information

To access your rubric:

Week 7 Discussion Rubric

Post by Day 4 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 7

To participate in this Discussion:

Week 7 Discussion


Assignment: Response Class

Photo Credit: hadjanebia / Adobe Stock

In this week’s Discussion, you identified and defined examples of behavior, response, and response class from your own behavioral repertoire. For this Assignment, using your behavioral repertoire, you will further explore these concepts by identifying another response class and five corresponding responses. Additionally, you will analyze which of the five responses you use most frequently to produce the same effect on the environment (i.e., response class) and why.  

To Prepare:

  • Consider behaviors in your own life in which you engage on a regular basis.

Assignment (1–2 pages)

  • Identify a behavior in your own life in which you engage on a regular basis.
  • Identify at least five different responses that can lead to the same result.
  • Which of these do you engage in most frequently to achieve that result? Why?
  • PSYC 6717: Foundation and Philosophy of Behavior Analysis

Be sure to support your Assignment with specific references to behavior-analytic theory and research. In addition to the Learning Resources, search the Walden Library and/or the internet for peer-reviewed articles to support your Assignment. Use proper APA format and citations, including those in the Learning Resources. 

By Day 7 of Week 7

Submit your Assignment.

Submission and Grading Information

To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

  • Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK7Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
  • Click on the Week 7 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
  • Click on the Week 7 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
  • Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK7Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click on Open.
  • If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database. PSYC 6717: Foundation and Philosophy of Behavior Analysis
  • Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:

Week 7 Assignment Rubric

Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

Submit your Week 7 Assignment draft and review the originality report.

Submit Your Assignment by Day 7

To submit your Assignment:

Week 7 Assignment


Week in Review

This week was the firstweek of Module 3: Concepts and Principles I. You examined terminology and concepts related to behavior and the environment, focusing specifically on examples of behavior, response, and response class from your own behavioral repertoire.

Next week, you will examine the associative learning processes of operant conditioning and respondent (classical) conditioning. You will consider behaviors for which each might be used most appropriately to understand and address a client’s behavior PSYC 6717: Foundation and Philosophy of Behavior Analysis.

Next Week

Week 8: Respondent and Operant Conditioning

Among the foundational concepts of applied behavior analysis (ABA) are respondent (classical) conditioning and operant conditioning. While operant conditioning clearly dominates the ABA field, there are also appropriate uses of respondent (classical) conditioning. In both cases, the behavior analyst seeks to manipulate the environment in order to effect behavior change—replacing undesired behaviors with desirable ones.

This week, you will examine operant and respondent (classical) conditioning and how each can be used to establish and modify behaviors. In addition, you will analyze the role of respondent (classical) conditioning in the practice of behavior analysis.

Learning Objectives

Students will:

  • Evaluate operant and respondent conditioning for selected behaviors
  • Analyze the role of respondent (classical) conditioning in the practice of behavior analysis

Learning Resources

Required Readings

Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2020). Applied behavior analysis (3rd ed.). Pearson.

  • Chapter 2, “Basic Concepts and Principles” (pp. 25–46)

(Previously read in Week 1)

Required Media

Walden University, LLC. (2021). Respondent and operant conditioning [Video]. Walden University Blackboard. https://class.waldenu.edu

 

Note: This media program is approximately 43 minutes.

 

Discussion: Respondent and Operant Conditioning

Photo Credit: GoodIdeas – stock.adobe.com

Operant and respondent (classical) conditioning are both used to establish and modify behaviors. These concepts originated in the field of behavioral psychology and share similarities and differences. Perhaps the clearest example of the difference between the two concepts is whether the behavior to be modified is automatic (i.e., involuntary) or under the subject’s conscious control (i.e., voluntary).

A thorough understanding of the similarities and differences between respondent (classical) conditioning and operant conditioning can provide you clarity about which would be most appropriate to apply in a given learning situation.

For this Discussion, you will contrast operant conditioning and respondent (classical) conditioning in the acquisition of a behavior and a rationale for the use of each. You will also identify behaviors that could be established using each technique.

To Prepare

  • Review the Learning Resources for this week.
  • Contrast operant conditioning and respondent conditioning in the acquisition of a behavior and consider why each works with some behaviors and not with others PSYC 6717: Foundation and Philosophy of Behavior Analysis.
  • Select two behaviors, one that could be established through operant conditioning and one that could be established through respondent conditioning.
  • Review the interactive media in the Learning Resources, “Respondent or Operant Conditioning?”

By Day 4 of Week 8

Post an explanation contrasting operant conditioning and respondent conditioning in the acquisition of a behavior. Be sure to identify why each works with some behaviors and not with others. Then, explain why each of the two behaviors you chose is more appropriate for respondent or operant conditioning.

Read your colleagues’ postings.

Note: For this discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by clicking on the To Participate in this Discussion link, then select Create Thread to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click on Submit, you cannot delete or edit your own posts, and cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking on Submit!

By Day 6 of Week 8

Respond to at least two colleagues’ posts by expanding on each of their explanations of how their chosen behaviors are more appropriate for respondent or operant conditioning.

Be sure to support your posts and responses with specific references to behavior-analytic theory and research. In addition to the Learning Resources, search the Walden Library and/or the internet for peer-reviewed articles to support your posts and responses. Use proper APA format and citations, including those in the Learning Resources.

Return to this Discussion in a few days to read the responses to your initial posting. Note what you have learned and/or any insights that you have gained because of your colleagues’ comments. PSYC 6717: Foundation and Philosophy of Behavior Analysis.

Submission and Grading Information

To access your rubric:

Week 8 Discussion Rubric

Post by Day 4 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 8

To participate in this Discussion:

Week 8 Discussion


Assignment: Application of Respondent (Classical) Conditioning

Photo Credit: motortion – stock.adobe.com

Applied behavior analysis (ABA) is heavily influenced by operant conditioning. The vast majority of your curriculum in ABA focuses on operant conditioning and its applications. However, respondent (classical) conditioning also has its appropriate applications in ABA.

The behaviorist assumptions that all learning occurs through observable interactions with the environment and the environment shapes behavior set the stage for respondent (classical) conditioning.

Perhaps you, or someone you know, was the victim of bullying at school. The bullying often creates emotional distress for the victim. Using the behaviorist assumptions, bullying is the interaction with the environment and the emotional distress is the behavior, or reflex, shaped by the environment. Classical conditioning involves placing a neutral signal before a naturally occurring reflex. PSYC 6717: Foundation and Philosophy of Behavior Analysis If a neutral stimulus (e.g., school) is paired with the bullying, school will come to evoke the emotional distress. At this point, the once neutral stimulus becomes known as the conditioned stimulus and evokes a learned, conditioned response of emotional distress.

Quantifying and collecting data about observable behaviors can be used to identify effective, evidence-based therapeutic interventions that can be helpful in changing undesirable behaviors. For this Assignment, you will evaluate the role of respondent (classical) conditioning and how it might be used in practice to better understand a client’s behavior.

To Prepare:

  • Review this week’s Learning Resources to gain an understanding of respondent (classical) conditioning.
  • Consider how respondent (classical) conditioning might be used to better understand client behavior.

Assignment (1–2 pages)

  • Why is it important to not forget the role of respondent (classical) conditioning as a practicing behavior analyst?
  • Give an original example of how respondent (classical) conditioning could be used in your practice to better understand a client’s behavior. PSYC 6717: Foundation and Philosophy of Behavior Analysis

Be sure to support your Assignment with specific references to behavior-analytic theory and research. In addition to the Learning Resources, search the Walden Library and/or the internet for peer-reviewed articles to support your Assignment. Use proper APA format and citations, including those in the Learning Resources. PSYC 6717: Foundation and Philosophy of Behavior Analysis.

By Day 7 of Week 8

Submit your Assignment.

Submission and Grading Information

To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

  • Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK8Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
  • Click on the Week 8 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
  • Click on the Week 8 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
  • Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK8Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click on Open.
  • If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
  • Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:

Week 8 Assignment Rubric

Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

Submit your Week 8 Assignment draft and review the originality report.

Submit Your Assignment by Day 7

To submit your Assignment:

Week 8 Assignment


Week in Review

This week was the second week of Module 3: Concepts and Principles I. You examined the associative learning processes of operant conditioning and respondent (classical) conditioning. PSYC 6717: Foundation and Philosophy of Behavior Analysis Additionally, you considered behaviors for which each might be used most appropriately to understand and address a client’s behavior.

Next week, you will complete Module 3. You will evaluate a problematic contingency scenario and propose a solution to address the problem. In addition, you will demonstrate your understanding of concepts and principles of behavior by taking the Module Test. PSYC 6717: Foundation and Philosophy of Behavior Analysis

Strategies for Addressing Questions NURS-6003 week 2 Discussion

Strategies for Addressing Questions NURS-6003 week 2 Discussion

Strategies for Addressing Questions NURS-6003 week 2 Discussion

Strategies for Addressing Questions

We learn many things about life and discover new information by asking questions. Since going back to school is an investment in to the future, it’s very crucial to know the exact information needed to make an informed decision, considering the fact that only 61% of students complete their master’s degree education (Sandy Baum & Patricia Steele, 2017). During my graduate school exploration, I formulated set of questions to guide me choose the right school Strategies for Addressing Questions NURS-6003 week 2 Discussion.

ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED SOLUTION PAPERS

Some of the questions that I assembled include: How much is the cost of attendance? How many credit hours required for graduation? How long will it take to graduate, based on part-time or full-time status? Should I enroll On-campus or off-campus school? What is the accreditation like? What kind of career assistance is available? Strategies for Addressing Questions NURS-6003 week 2 Discussion What are the graduation requirements? Based on the responses I received from various sides, I chose Walden University.

Inquiries about the program were sufficed by the enrollment specialist who I have being in contact since enrollment. Further questions regarding program preparation, work-study balance, and dos and don’ts were addressed by two individuals from my academic and professional network. Thanks to the stories and insights featured on Walden’s Spotlight program, Dr. Pyllis Morgan mentions that having a strong support system can reduce the stress and the anxiety in today’s frantic life (Morgan, 2017).

However, there are couple questions that I haven’t being able to get answers yet:

What applied experiences including internships, are included in Nursing Executive degree?

Do most students publish an article or present a paper before graduation?

I am hoping that I will get the answers as I go along with the program. Strategies for Addressing Questions NURS-6003 week 2 Discussion

References

Baum, S., & Steele, P. (2017). Who goes to graduate school and who succeeds? SSRN Electronic Journalhttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2898458.

Walden University. (2017). Balancing a nursing career, family, and education. https://www.waldenu.edu/connect/newsroom/spotlight/2017/balancing-a-nursing-career-family-and-education

Discussion: Strategies for Addressing Questions

In Module 1, you began building a foundation for your success by considering a network-individuals and teams who can help you to clarify and execute on the vision. A network is most helpful when you are comfortable asking questions. Chances are other members of your network have experienced similar questions and may have helped guide others toward resolutions that can now be helpful Strategies for Addressing Questions NURS-6003 week 2 Discussion.

In this Discussion, focus on the questions you are ready to ask as your journey begins. Keep in mind that sharing questions is often a great way to help others who have similar questions even if they do not realize it!

To prepare:

  • Reflect on questions or concerns you might have as you begin the MSN program.
  • Consider the individuals, teams, and departments you previously considered in Module 1 as well as how they may provide support with addressing these questions and concerns.

    ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED SOLUTION PAPERS

By Day 3 of Week 2

Post any questions or concerns that you are willing to share with the group. The Discussion board represents an opportunity to network with your course colleagues, and others may have the same questions or concerns Strategies for Addressing Questions NURS-6003 week 2 Discussion.

By Day 6 of Week 2

Respond to at least two of your colleagues’ posts by offering a possible resolution to their questions/concerns with supporting documentation, if possible, or expanding on their thinking and providing an example as support.

One of the major questions I have as I begin the nursing program concerns the topic for my capstone project. I have had some of my colleagues and friends who have gone before me get stuck at the project stage either because they could not get an appropriate topic or get the relevant data for the project. Strategies for Addressing Questions NURS-6003 week 2 Discussion I have tried to think ahead to what will interest me and what will be relevant to my practice so that when the time comes I will not have major challenges. Sigma theta tau international will be useful in helping me understand the issues that affect the profession and delivery of care, and guide me in selecting a topic, buy understanding previous research by the organization (Sigma, 2020). The American Nurses Association (ANA, 2020) will provide access to peer reviewed journal that will help guide me in selecting the direction for my topic, by providing access to scholarly articles in my interested field. My mentors will also help me select a topic and provide any further guidance and direction during the project Strategies for Addressing Questions NURS-6003 week 2 Discussion.

Another concern I may have is over my licensing and certification, how to go about it and how to prepare to ensure that I pass in record time and begin my practice. My mentors will play a major role in helping me prepare for the exams and in providing me with useful tips and strategies. Sigma Theta Tau will provide a useful platform for networking with other students and nurse leaders exceptional in their fields (Sigma, 2020) Strategies for Addressing Questions NURS-6003 week 2 Discussion. Through these networks, I may get advice and support not only on the licensing exams but also on future practice. The ANA (2020) will also provide opportunities for networking where I can connect with like- minded professionals in research and practice, which will help guide the progression and direction of my career during and after my masters’ program.

References

American Nurses Association. (2020). Practice and advocacy. Retrieved from: https://www.nursingworld.org/ana/

Sigma. (2020). About Sigma. Retrieved from: https://www.sigmanursing.org/  Strategies for Addressing Questions NURS-6003 week 2 Discussion

NURS 6521 week 1 Discussion: Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics

NURS 6521 week 1 Discussion: Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics

Discussion: Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics

As an advanced practice nurse assisting physicians in the diagnosis and treatment of disorders, it is important to not only understand the impact of disorders on the body, but also the impact of drug treatments on the body. The relationships between drugs and the body can be described by pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. NURS 6521 week 1 Discussion: Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics

ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED SOLUTION PAPERS

Pharmacokinetics describes what the body does to the drug through absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion, whereas pharmacodynamics describes what the drug does to the body.

When selecting drugs and determining dosages for patients, it is essential to consider individual patient factors that might impact the patient’s pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes. These patient factors include genetics, gender, ethnicity, age, behavior (i.e., diet, nutrition, smoking, alcohol, illicit drug abuse), and/or pathophysiological changes due to disease. NURS 6521 week 1 Discussion: Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics

For this Discussion, you reflect on a case from your past clinical experiences and consider how a patient’s pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes may alter his or her response to a drug.

To Prepare
  • Review the Resources for this module and consider the principles of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.
  • Reflect on your experiences, observations, and/or clinical practices from the last 5 years and think about how pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic factors altered his or her anticipated response to a drug. NURS 6521 week 1 Discussion: Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics
  • Consider factors that might have influenced the patient’s pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes, such as genetics (including pharmacogenetics), gender, ethnicity, age, behavior, and/or possible pathophysiological changes due to disease.
  • Think about a personalized plan of care based on these influencing factors and patient history in your case study.
By Day 3 of Week 1

Post a description of the patient case from your experiences, observations, and/or clinical practice from the last 5 years. Then, describe factors that might have influenced pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes of the patient you identified. Finally, explain details of the personalized plan of care that you would develop based on influencing factors and patient history in your case. NURS 6521 week 1 Discussion: Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics. Be specific and provide examples. NURS 6521 week 1 Discussion: Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics

By Day 6 of Week 1

Read a selection of your colleagues’ responses and respond to at least two of your colleagues on two different days by suggesting additional patient factors that might have interfered with the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes of the patients they described. In addition, suggest how the personalized plan of care might change if the age of the patient were different and/or if the patient had a comorbid condition, such as renal failure, heart failure, or liver failure. NURS 6521 week 1 Discussion: Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics

Pharmacotherapy for Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Disorders Sample Essay

Pharmacotherapy for Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Disorders Sample Essay

Pharmacotherapy for Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Disorders Sample Essay

Pharmacotherapy for acute gastroenteritis

Acute gastroenteritis

Due to the presenting symptoms of nausea vomiting and diarrhea, the patient may be suffering from acute gastroenteritis. Acute gastroenteritis is an intestinal inflammation commonly characterized by diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, fever and abdominal cramps. It is commonly caused by viruses or bacteria. More diagnostic procedures such as blood and stool tests are required to determine the definitive cause of the condition (U. Desselberger, 2003). Pharmacotherapy for Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Disorders Sample Essay

Treatment of gastroenteritis is dependent on the cause. Risk factors of gastroenteritis include young children, elderly, and a weakened immune system. Based on the current medication taken by the patient, prednisolone, a corticosteroid is known of the effect of weakening the immune system which may in turn predispose the patient to other infections. Prednisolone may also have caused the presenting complaints since nausea, vomiting and diarrhea are its common side effects (Malangu, 2018) Pharmacotherapy for Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Disorders Sample Essay.

ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED SOLUTION PAPERS

Appropriate drug therapy.

The appropriate drug therapy includes continuation of Synthroid 100mcg once daily to counter the hypothyroidism effect of hepatitis C. Tapering off prednisolone is also recommended to help elevate the body immune system as well as discontinue the possible associated side effects. The current nifedipine dosage should be investigated according to the underlying condition that could have led to the initiation and continuation of its dosage. Promethazine 25mg every 4 to 6 hours as desired is recommended to manage the nausea and vomiting. Oral rehydration by the use of Oral Rehydrating Salt is recommended to prevent dehydration due to excessive water loss through diarrhea and vomiting. Probiotics Saccharomyces boulardii is recommended for management of the acute diarrhea (Kenneth L. Koch, 2016). Pharmacotherapy for Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Disorders Sample Essay.

 

 

References

Kenneth L. Koch, W. L. (2016). Nausea and Vomiting: Diagnosis and Treatment. Springer.

Malangu, N. (2018). Pharmacokinetics and Adverse Effects of Drugs: Mechanisms and Risks Factors. BoD – Books on Demand.

  1. Desselberger, J. G. (2003). Viral Gastroenteritis. Gulf Professional Publishing. Pharmacotherapy for Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Disorders Sample Essay

 

By Day 7 of Week 4

Write a 1-page paper that addresses the following:

  • Explain your diagnosis for the patient, including your rationale for the diagnosis.
  • Describe an appropriate drug therapy plan based on the patient’s history, diagnosis, and drugs currently prescribed.
  • Justify why you would recommend this drug therapy plan for this patient. Be specific and provide examples.
  • Pharmacotherapy for Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Disorders Sample Essay

NRNP 6665 Discussion Wk 1 Comprehensive Integrated Psychiatric Assessment

NRNP 6665 Discussion Wk 1 Comprehensive Integrated Psychiatric Assessment

NRNP 6665 Discussion Wk 1 Comprehensive Integrated Psychiatric Assessment – YMH Boston Vignette 5 video

Required Readings

  • Srinath, S., Jacob, P., Sharma, E., & Gautam, A. (2019). Clinical practice guidelines for assessment of children and adolescents. Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 61(2), 158–175. http://doi.org/10.4103/psychiatry.IndianJPsychiatry_580_18
  • Sadock, B. J., Sadock, V. A., & Ruiz, P. (2015). Kaplan & Sadock’s synopsis of psychiatry (11th ed.). Wolters Kluwer. • Chapter 31, “Child Psychiatry” (for review, as needed)
  • Thapar, A., Pine, D. S., Leckman, J. F., Scott, S., Snowling, M. J., & Taylor, E. A. (2015). Rutter’s child and adolescent psychiatry (6th © 2021 Walden University, LLC Page 2 of 20 Week 1 Child and Adolescent Assessment ed.). Wiley Blackwell. • Chapter 32, “Clinical assessment and diagnostic formulation” NRNP 6665 Discussion Wk 1 Comprehensive Integrated Psychiatric Assessment – YMH Boston Vignette 5 video

Required Media

 

Discussion

 

Comprehensive Integrated Psychiatric Assessment

 

Based on the YMH Boston Vignette 5 video, post answers to the following questions:

  • What did the practitioner do well? In what areas can the practitioner improve?
  • At this point in the clinical interview, do you have any compelling concerns? If so, what are they?
  • What would be your next question, and why? NRNP 6665 Discussion Wk 1 Comprehensive Integrated Psychiatric Assessment – YMH Boston Vignette 5 video

    ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED SOLUTION PAPERS

Then, address the following. Your answers to these prompts

  • Explain why a thorough psychiatric assessment of a child/adolescent is important.
  • Describe two different symptom rating scales that would be appropriate to use during the psychiatric assessment of a child/adolescent.
  • Describe two psychiatric treatment options for children and adolescents that may not be used when treating adults.
  • Explain the role parents/guardians play in assessment.
  • NRNP 6665 Discussion Wk 1 Comprehensive Integrated Psychiatric Assessment – YMH Boston Vignette 5 video

 

Support your response with at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources and explain why each of your supporting sources is considered scholarly. Attach the PDFs of your sources. NRNP 6665 Discussion Wk 1 Comprehensive Integrated Psychiatric Assessment – YMH Boston Vignette 5 video

NRNP – 6541 Primary Care of Adolescents & Children

NRNP – 6541 Primary Care of Adolescents & Children

Week 1: Overview of Growth and Development and Genetic Conditions

How many times have you wished you had a crystal ball? How often have you thought, If only I had known…in relation to personal and professional decisions? We all wish we always had the best information and advice available for charting the best path forward.

Sometimes we have the information we need—and sometimes we are that crystal ball for others. Specifically, as a nurse practitioner engaged in pediatric care, you have a significant role in setting young people on a healthy path through life. Certainly, a crystal ball is not among your professional tools. (And how much easier would your work be if it were?) Rather, your knowledge of factors for optimal growth and development, and guidance for families in establishing habits that help children thrive, can support longer, happier, and more productive lives for your pediatric patients.

ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED SOLUTION PAPERS

Understanding what impacts growth and development in positive or adverse ways enables you to both treat specific conditions and promote wellness. Here, too, knowledge is key. Not only in terms of information such as a family’s genetic history, but in working closely with families to learn their ideas of what matters for children’s growth and development. Appreciating and respecting cultural perspectives is vital in creating a foundation of trust for encouraging healthful choices and decisions for children and, as they age into adolescence, by them as well. NRNP – 6541 Primary Care of Adolescents & Children

This week you will begin with an overview of human growth and development that continues with more depth in the weeks that follow. Through the Week 1 text readings and other Learning Resources, you will also examine fundamentals of pediatric care and analyze the challenges and opportunities this course provides in meeting your career goals. No crystal ball required—just thoughtful consideration of the path you aim to follow in advanced nursing as a Family Nurse Practitioner.

Learning Objectives

Students will:

  • Analyze strengths and challenges related to advanced nursing in pediatric care
  • Analyze career goals and objectives in pediatrics

Learning Resources

Required Readings (click to expand/reduce)
Required Media (click to expand/reduce)

Discussion: Getting Started with Pediatrics

 

Photo Credit: Seventyfour / Adobe Stock

Primary care of children from newborns to those on the cusp of adulthood requires considerable knowledge, as well as the finesse to manage parents and families of all types, and the changing needs, attitudes, and independence of young people as they grow and mature. Considering that this week—in fact, this entire first module—is focused on growth and development, it is fitting for you to reflect on your current and anticipated

growth and development in advanced nursing, and specifically, in pediatric care. When you made your decision to pursue training as a Family Nurse Practitioner, how did pediatrics factor in your thinking? Is the opportunity to work with children and adolescents a strong motivator, or does it rank for you as more of a concern?

As you get started with this course, take time to reflect on your present capacity as you prepare to immerse yourself in the requirements of pediatric care as a nurse practitioner. How can you benefit most from this course, and how can it further you along the professional path you have chosen or in achieving your career goals?

This Discussion can be a catalyst for self-assessment and offer valuable insights from your colleagues. It is also an opportunity to get to know them and to introduce yourself, in anticipation of further interaction as you engage in the course i-Human Assignments. NRNP – 6541 Primary Care of Adolescents & Children

To prepare:

  • Review this week’s Learning Resources, and particularly Chapters 5, 6, 8, and 14 of the Burns’ Pediatric Primary Care text.
  • Consider the roles and responsibilities of a nurse practitioner providing pediatric primary care. Work to define the strengths you bring to the position of Family Nurse Practitioner and the challenges you face.
  • Reflect on this course and what you expect to learn and do, such as by reviewing the course description, outcomes, and course introduction. Consider how the next 11 weeks can help build your strengths and address your challenges.
  • Also consider your career goals and objectives and how this course can support and/or further them. Be detailed in your thinking.

By Day 3 of Week 1

Post a brief introduction of yourself that includes an explanation of your strengths and challenges as they apply to pediatrics and the role of a Family Nurse Practitioner. Also explain your career goals and objectives, and how your work in this course can help to accomplish those goals and objectives as a Family Nurse Practitioner. Use your research to support your explanations by providing credible and scholarly sources.

Read a selection of your colleagues’ responses.

By Day 6 of Week 1

Respond to at least two of your colleagues’ posts on two different days by offering suggestions or resources to help your colleagues in addressing their professional strengths, challenges, or career goals and objectives. Use your research to support your suggestions. Provide at least 3 credible and current scholarly sources.

Note: For this Discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by clicking on the “Post to Discussion Question” link and then select “Create Thread” to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click on Submit, you cannot delete or edit your own posts, and you cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking on Submit!

Submission and Grading Information

Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:

Week 1 Discussion Rubric

Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 1

To Participate in this Discussion:

Week 1 Discussion


Assignment: i-Human Case Studies

 

Photo Credit: Oksana Kuzmina / Adobe Stock

In the weeks ahead, you will be required to complete assignments addressing specific health conditions through a virtual patient encounter using the i-Human simulation software. You will have a total of six i-Human Case Study Assignments throughout the course, which you will complete in the i-Human Patients platform.

In preparation for your first assignment, ensure that you are able to login to the software. Refer to the Student Manual in the Learning Resources for this week for support in navigating i-Human.

In addition, you are highly encouraged to explore the practice case, available in the Week 1 Learning Resources. No grade will be assigned for this practice case, but it must be completed in Week 1 to receive feedback.

No Assignment submission required for this week. 


Assignment 2

Practicum Manual Acknowledgment

The Practicum Manual describes the structure and timing of the classroom-based and practicum experiences and the policies students must follow to be successful in the nurse practitioner (NP) specialties.

Click here and follow the instructions to confirm you have downloaded and read the entire MSN Nurse Practitioner Practicum Manual and will abide by the requirements described in order to successfully complete this program.


What’s Coming Up in Week 2?

Practicum – Upcoming Deadline

In the Nurse Practitioner programs of study (FNP, AGACNP, AGPCNP, and PMHNP) you are required to take several practicum courses. If you plan on taking a practicum course within the next two terms, you will need to submit your application via Meditrek .

For information on the practicum application process and deadlines, please visit the Field Experience: College of Nursing: Application Process – Graduate web page.

Please take the time to review the Appropriate Preceptors and Field Sites for your courses.

Please take the time to review the practicum manuals, FAQs, Webinars and any required forms on the Field Experience: College of Nursing: Student Resources and Manuals web page.

 

Photo Credit: [BrianAJackson]/[iStock / Getty Images Plus]/Getty Images

Next week, you will continue your focus on growth and development with a detailed exploration of the first years of life. In considering primary care of infants, toddlers, and preschoolers, you will explore issues that can affect young children’s growth and development. NRNP – 6541 Primary Care of Adolescents & Children

i-Human Case Study

 

Photo Credit: Getty Images/iStockphoto

In Week 2, you will complete your first i-Human Case Study Assignment on evaluation and management of growth and development issues. Be sure you have your i-Human login and password, and contact your Instructor if you are missing this information.

 

Week 2: Infants, Toddlers, and Preschoolers

When we think of human growth and development, perhaps no age comes to mind more vividly than the youngest children. Tracking the extraordinary changes that occur with often amazing speed from birth to the advent of formal schooling around age 5 is exciting, awe-inspiring, and frequently, anxiety producing for families. The spectrum of where children may fall in growth and development is particularly wide in these years. And recognizing when extra attention is needed or a condition is present to be addressed can be made more complicated by family interpretations or expectations, and the limited capacity of infants, toddlers, and preschoolers to convey what they are, or are not, experiencing.

Primary care of infants, toddlers, and preschoolers requires both detective and diplomatic skills on the part of nurse practitioners. Assessing very young children involves employing knowledge of child development and developmental milestones with what you can observe and interpreting red flags that may signal developmental issues. As to diplomacy, families can hold beliefs, notably resistance to vaccines and immunization protocols, which impact young children’s health and well-being. Working with families to understand and address their ideas, preferences, and possible misconceptions is vital for developing a solid care team of key adults and you.

This week you will prepare for your youngest patients with Learning Resources on topics related to care and development of infants, toddlers, and preschoolers, as well as recognizing and responding to developmental concerns. Through your first i-Human Case Study Assignment this week, you will assess, evaluate, diagnose, treat, and manage patients with potential growth and development issues. Keep in mind that considering the unique needs of the family is an essential element of this and every pediatric visit in the course, and your future practice.

Learning Objectives

Students will:

  • Assess growth and development in pediatric patients
  • Evaluate health conditions of pediatric patients
  • Formulate differential diagnoses for pediatric patients
  • Analyze socio-cultural needs of pediatric patients and families
  • Formulate evidence-based treatment and management plans
  • Recommend evidence-based care strategies and wellness education for pediatric patients and families

Learning Resources

Required Readings (click to expand/reduce)
Required Media (click to expand/reduce)

Assignment: i-Human Case Study: Evaluation and Management of Growth and Development Issues

 

Photo Credit: Getty Images/Blend Images

Imagine this is your first day or perhaps your 500th day as a Family Nurse Practitioner. You enter the examination room where a young child—infant, toddler, preschooler—and one or more family members, who may be a parent, grandparent, or other caregiver, are waiting for you. Imagine the child and family are new patients, and this is your first time meeting them.

That introduction sets the stage for this Assignment. You will use the i-Human technology to meet and treat your avatar pediatric patient. Pay particular attention to the socio-cultural details that are provided for the featured family. Consider what would be important for you to know and to ask in order not only to assess, evaluate, and diagnose a young child, but also to develop evidence-based treatment and management plans and recommend specific activities and routines to promote health and wellness.

To prepare:

  • Review the Learning Resources. Consider how to apply understanding of developmental milestones and socio-cultural family needs in assessing, diagnosing, and treating pediatric patients.
  • Access i-Human Patients from this week’s Learning Resources and review the i-Human Case Study. Based on the provided patient information, think about the health history you would need to collect from the patient.
  • Consider what physical exams and diagnostic tests would be appropriate to gather more information about the patient’s condition. Reflect on how the results would be used to make a diagnosis.
  • Identify 3–5 possible conditions that may be considered in a differential diagnosis for the patient.
  • Consider the patient’s diagnosis. Think about clinical guidelines that might support this diagnosis.
  • Develop a treatment plan for the patient that includes health promotion and patient education strategies for patients and families. NRNP – 6541 Primary Care of Adolescents & Children

Assignment:

As you interact with this week’s i-Human patient, complete the assigned case study. For guidance on using i-Human, refer to the i-Human Graduate Programs Help link within the i-Human platform.

By Day 7 of Week 2

Complete your Assignment in i-Human.

Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:

Week 2 Assignment Rubric


What’s Coming Up in Week 3?

 

Photo Credit: [BrianAJackson]/[iStock / Getty Images Plus]/Getty Images

Next week, you will focus on growth and development of school-age children and adolescents up to age 21, when young people transition to adult care. Although you will not have an i-Human Case Study Assignment next week addressing this specific age group, looking ahead to other modules in the course, you will have i-Human Assignments that feature patients ages 5 and older. Careful attention to key aspects of growth and development for school-age children and adolescents will support your work in future weeks.

Knowledge Check

 

Next week, you will take the Module 1 Knowledge Check. This formative assessment will include questions pertaining to content from Weeks 1–3. Plan your time accordingly to allow adequate time to read and review all Module 1 Learning Resources to prepare for the Knowledge Check, which must be completed by Day 7.

Week 3: School-Age Children and Adolescents

Consider the range of pediatric patients you may see in an average day as a Family Nurse Practitioner. Some may be the little ones you examined previously. Some may be young school-age children whose stages of growth and development are closer to preschoolers and not yet transitioning to middle childhood. Yet as your patients increase in chronological age, growth and development take more conspicuous turns. It is no coincidence that teachers of young children and teachers of young adolescents have many parallel experiences. Both early childhood and young adolescence are significant periods of physical, cognitive, social, and emotional development.

Although aspects of pediatric care for school-age and adolescent patients can be easier—most, at least theoretically, are able to answer questions—the need for both detective and diplomatic skills continues. Physical changes in children can trigger all kinds and degrees of emotional response. Concerns about body image are central in this time, and “early bloomers” and “late bloomers” can struggle as they compare themselves to some concept of “normal.” Blooming sexuality can raise issues of confidentiality, such as when teens and parents are in conflict over sexual activity or identification. Your role requires understanding rights on all sides and negotiating help, when you can.

This week, the Learning Resources are selected to help you prepare for both the mundane and dramatic aspects of monitoring growth and development, and resulting care needs, of school-age children and adolescents. There is no assignment pertaining to this age group, in order to allow sufficient time to review for your Module 1 Knowledge Check. However, keep in mind that as you move on to the next modules on specific conditions, your foundational knowledge of growth and development in children and teens will aid in assessing and evaluating your i-Human pediatric patients, and of course, your very human ones ahead.

Learning Objective

Students will:

  • Identify key terms, principles, and concepts related to growth and development of infants, toddlers, preschoolers, school-age children, and adolescents, and primary care of pediatric patients

Learning Resources

Required Readings (click to expand/reduce)
Required Media (click to expand/reduce)

Knowledge Check: Module 1: Evaluation and Management of Growth and Development Issues

 

Photo Credit: Getty Images/iStockphoto

Throughout the course you will have 4 Knowledge Check assessments, one in each module. These exercises are situated to provide you with formative practice, help you gauge your understanding of each module, and prepare for the Midterm in Week 6 and the Final Exam in Week 11. Looking ahead, each Knowledge Check also helps to ready you for the exam that will count most, for your Family Nurse Practitioner certification.

This week, be sure to allot plenty of time for reviewing key concepts and information from Weeks 1–3. A list of topics is included to help you focus your preparation. You will have 20 questions to answer.

To prepare:

  • Review Weeks 1–3 Learning Resources, using the topic list, below, as a guide.
  • Module 1 Knowledge Check topics will include the following:
    • Developmental milestones of infants, toddlers, preschoolers, school-age children, and adolescents
    • Developmental issues and red flags
    • Genetic conditions
    • Preventative care and wellness
    • Vaccines and immunizations
    • Age/stage-appropriate healthy nutrition/elimination, physical activity, sleep and rest
    • Age/stage-appropriate healthy sexual development and sexuality
    • Socio-cultural considerations in treating/working with patients and families
    • Evidence-based strategies for patient/family health promotion and education

Knowledge Check

You are required to answer 20 questions, randomly selected. You will have 1 attempt for each question. Each question is worth 1 point.

By Day 7 of Week 3

Complete and submit your Knowledge Check.

Submission Information

Submit Your Knowledge Check by Day 7

To submit your Knowledge Check:

Week 3 Knowledge Check

What’s Coming Up in Module 2?

 

Photo Credit: [BrianAJackson]/[iStock / Getty Images Plus]/Getty Images

Next week you will move on to Module 2 and the introduction of specific health conditions to address in children and adolescents.

i-Human Case Study

In Week 4, you will complete a i-Human Case Study Assignment on Eye, Ear, Nose, and Throat conditions. As needed, consult the i-Human Manual to answer questions or in other ways strengthen your preparation for the week ahead.

 

Photo Credit: Getty Images/iStockphoto

Module 2: EENT, Respiratory and Cardiovascular, and Dermatological Conditions

Think of all the common sayings that use parts of the body to convey strong emotions, even though, taken literally, they make little sense. For example, “I’m all ears!”, meaning you’re very eager to hear what somebody has to say. But everyone has only two ears and when those two ears are working properly, in most situations, two is enough. Imagine how loud and chaotic the world would sound to be listening with 10 ears, or 20!

Or we talk, and often with great drama, about eyes being like windows that let us look inside another person and know that person deeply. But eyes are designed to see out, and not for others to see in.

Lungs and heart are also favorites. When we’re very enthusiastic or very mad, we “yell at the top of our lungs!” Not at the bottom of the lungs, always the top. If “you wear your heart on your sleeve,” you’re letting everyone know how you feel. And overall, we speak of the heart as where emotions are found, as though love and courage, anger, sadness and fear, are all crammed inside that pumping muscle.

Here’s one more example: when something “gets under our skin,” we’re truly upset! How that saying evolved is certainly a mystery. Because, well, there is something under our skin: muscle, bone, blood and a whole amazing set of organs and array of systems that make up the human body.

The point here is not how nonsensical language can be, but how connected we are emotionally to our bodies and, in particular, to certain parts. As a nurse practitioner you will have varying opportunities to explore eyes, ears, heart, lungs, skin—and conditions that can go wrong with each in children and adolescents. It’s good to remember how special those parts are, not just in function but in feeling too.

What’s Happening This Module?

Module 2: EENT, Respiratory and Cardiovascular, and Dermatological Conditions is a 3-week module. In each week of the module, you will focus on specific structures or systems of the body and consider conditions that children and adolescents may present. Specifically, in Week 4, your attention is eye, ear, nose, and throat (EENT) conditions and includes an i-Human Case Study Assignment to complete. In Week 5, you move on to the respiratory and cardiovascular systems, with the third i-Human Case Study Assignment. In Week 6, your focus is dermatological conditions, with Learning Resources on skin issues and ailments in childhood and adolescence. There is no i-Human Assignment in Week 6, to allow ample time to prepare for two key assessments: The Module 2 Knowledge Check and the Midterm Exam.

 

What do I have to do? When do I have to do it?
Review your Learning Resources Days 1–7, Weeks 4, 5, 6 

 

Week 4 i-Human Case Study: Evaluation and Management of EENT Conditions 

 

By Day 7 of Week 4 

Complete and submit your i-Human Case Study Assignment

Week 5 i-Human Case Study: Evaluation and Management of Respiratory and Cardiovascular Conditions By Day 7 of Week 5 

Complete and submit your i-Human Case Study Assignment

Week 6 Module 2 Knowledge Check 

 

By Day 5 of Week 6 

Complete and submit your Module 2 Knowledge Check

Week 6 Midterm Exam 

 

By Day 7 of Week 6 

Complete and submit your Midterm Exam

 

Go to Weekly Content

 

Week 4: Evaluation and Management of EENT Conditions

It is the first thing you observe as you meet a young patient—the child’s face: eyes, ears, nose, mouth. So, as this course on primary care shifts from a focus on a child’s whole-body growth and development to specific body structures and systems, it is natural to start with those defining features.

Close observation is among your most important tools in caring for children and adolescents. Eyes, ears, nose, and throat (EENT) exams are all part of a well-child visit. Your knowledge of what is normal and what is not will support you in identifying conditions and disorders that can impact children’s sight and hearing, their normal breathing, and restful sleep.

Assessing and evaluating EENT conditions may require your detective skills of observing, listening, and careful questioning. Or, in cases of injury to eyes, an object in a child’s ear or nose, or an obvious throat issue, the problem and your needed response may be immediately clear. The Learning Resources this week provide knowledge and recommendations for preparing for pediatric patients with a range of possible EENT conditions and emergencies, and for making diagnoses and determining treatments.

Keep in mind the importance of your relationship with parents and guardians. The more you understand about a family and the greater the cooperative bond you form, the more effective the management strategies you can provide.

This week you will further your preparation in all of these aspects of pediatric care as you complete your i-Human Case Study in evaluating and managing EENT conditions.

Learning Objectives

Students will:

  • Assess pediatric patients for eye, ear, nose, and throat conditions
  • Evaluate health conditions of pediatric patients
  • Formulate differential diagnoses for eye, ear, nose, and throat conditions in pediatric patients
  • Analyze socio-cultural needs of pediatric patients and families
  • Formulate evidence-based treatment and management plans for eye, ear, nose, and throat conditions in pediatric patients
  • Recommend evidence-based strategies for educating patients and families on treatment and management of eye, ear, nose, and throat conditions

Learning Resources

Required Readings (click to expand/reduce)
Required Media (click to expand/reduce)

Assignment: i-Human Case Study: Evaluation and Management of EENT Conditions

 

Photo Credit: Getty Images

Welcome to another i-Human Case Study. Take a moment to imagine a child and family you might meet. Based on the Learning Resources for this week, consider eye, ear, nose, and throat (EENT) conditions you may identify frequently as a Family Nurse Practitioner and those that may be more unusual. Also consider what aspects of the exam process might be more challenging for you—assessing, evaluating, providing multiple diagnoses, treatments, or offering the patient and family management advice. Work to be mindful of how to take best advantage of the simulated i-Human exam to prepare for pediatric patients with EENT conditions.

To prepare: 

  • Review this week’s Learning Resources and consider how to apply knowledge of EENT conditions and understanding of socio-cultural family needs in assessing, diagnosing, and treating pediatric patients.
  • Access i-Human Patients from this week’s Learning Resources and review the i-Human Case Study. Based on the provided patient information, think about the health history you would need to collect from the patient.
  • Consider what physical exams and diagnostic tests would be appropriate to gather more information about the patient’s condition. Reflect on how the results would be used to make a diagnosis.
  • Identify 3–5 possible conditions that may be considered in a differential diagnosis for the patient.
  • Consider the patient’s diagnosis. Think about clinical guidelines that might support this diagnosis.
  • Develop a treatment plan for the patient that includes health promotion and patient education strategies for patients with EENT conditions and their families. NRNP – 6541 Primary Care of Adolescents & Children

Assignment: 

As you interact with this week’s i-Human patient, complete the assigned case study. For guidance on using i-Human, refer to the i-Human Graduate Programs Help link within the i-Human platform.

By Day 7 of Week 4

Complete your Assignment in i-Human.

Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:

Week 4 Assignment Rubric


What’s Coming Up in Week 5?

 

Photo Credit: [BrianAJackson]/[iStock / Getty Images Plus]/Getty Images

Next week, you will address respiratory and cardiovascular health of children and adolescents and conditions related to these critical human systems. As a Family Nurse Practitioner, you may be the first to diagnose a child’s respiratory or cardiovascular condition or be part of an ongoing effort to treat and manage one. Needless to say, the Week 5 content is among the most significant for the well-being of pediatric patients.

Week 5: Evaluation and Management of Respiratory and Cardiovascular Conditions

Respiratory disorders are a natural next focus from EENT, given the nostrils and epiglottis are part of the upper respiratory tract. And a stuffy or runny nose, and a scratchy or sore throat are among the symptoms of familiar upper respiratory conditions like the common cold.

Lower respiratory tract disorders such as pediatric asthma may also be common, particularly if you practice in an inner-city urban center (Asthma and Allergy Foundation of America, 2019). Helping families manage a child’s asthma and other respiratory conditions with environmental triggers, such as secondhand smoke, can involve astute diplomacy in recommending ways to provide healthier air at home.

As you anticipate what to expect in assessing cardiovascular conditions in children, consider that “most…are due to congenital heart disease (CHD), which affects nearly 1% of all live births—or about 40,000 babies per year” (Burns, 2017, p. 756). Whether you will care for a child with CHD, or be the first to recognize a child’s condition, your work requires “a high index of suspicion regarding any signs or symptoms of cardiovascular disease in young children” (Burns, 2017, p. 756).

While CHD may cause most pediatric heart ailments, cardiovascular disease can be acquired when children and adolescents develop hypertension. For many young people under stress or getting too little physical exercise and carrying too much body weight, high blood pressure is a dangerous outcome. In turn, understanding family history and habits is vital for managing the condition and helping the child or adolescent, and perhaps the entire family, to adopt different approaches, priorities, and routines.

This week, will be a “quiet” week in which you will take the time to review the Learning Resources and prepare for your Midterm Exam in Week 6. No Assignment submissions will be required for this week however, it will be important for you to continue to work through the topics for this week. The Learning Resources will prepare for your pivotal role as a primary care provider in evaluating and managing pediatric respiratory and cardiovascular conditions.

Reference
Asthma and Allergy Foundation of America. (2019). Asthma capitals 2019https://www.aafa.org/asthma-capitals/

Learning Objectives

Students will:

  • Assess pediatric patients for respiratory and cardiovascular conditions (A)
  • Evaluate health conditions of pediatric patients (A)
  • Formulate differential diagnoses for pediatric respiratory conditions (A)
  • Formulate differential diagnoses for pediatric cardiovascular conditions (A)
  • Analyze socio-cultural needs of pediatric patients and families (A)
  • Formulate evidence-based treatment and management plans for pediatric patients with respiratory conditions (A)
  • Formulate evidence-based treatment and management plans for pediatric patients with cardiovascular conditions (A)
  • Recommend evidence-based strategies for educating patients and families on treatment and management of respiratory conditions (A)
  • Recommend evidence-based strategies for educating patients and families on treatment and management of cardiovascular conditions (A) NRNP – 6541 Primary Care of Adolescents & Children

Learning Resources

Required Readings (click to expand/reduce)
Required Media (click to expand/reduce)

What’s Coming Up in Week 6?

 

Photo Credit: [BrianAJackson]/[iStock / Getty Images Plus]/Getty Images

Next week you will focus on skin conditions that afflict children and adolescents. Although you will not have an i-Human Case Study to complete, you will be tested on your dermatological knowledge in two assessments. The Module 2 Knowledge Check will cover the Week 6 Learning Resources as well as those from Weeks 4 and 5.

Midterm Exam

 

Photo Credit: [triloks]/[E+]/Getty Images

Week 6 marks the midpoint of the course and, accordingly, you will take the Midterm Exam. Plan carefully for next week, to ensure adequate time to study for both the Module 2 Knowledge Check, which you are encouraged to submit by Day 5, or at least 48 hours before completing the Midterm, which is due by Day 7.

Week 6: Evaluation and Management of Dermatological Conditions

Whoever first coined the phrase, it’s only skin deep, meaning something of not great importance or consequence, either lived a charmed life of no dermatological disorders, or had a high tolerance for discomfort. From infancy to adolescence, skin rashes and eruptions can wreak havoc for children physically. Skin conditions can also affect appearance in ways that create embarrassment, particularly for older children and adolescents.

As the body’s largest organ, the skin is susceptible to many disorders with many causes, from bacterial to parasitic. Some dermatological conditions are temporary and some, such as eczema, can be chronic. With the natural variations in skin pigment, some dermatological disorders are specific to or present differently in children and adolescents with dark skin or of particular ethnic background.

Skin conditions, especially chronic ones, also require extra attention to child-family education and management. The plan “must be individualized using all the characteristics of the child and family that make them unique—age, education, health literacy, cultural background, family structure and function, economic status, stress, community support and resources, and others” (Burns, 2017, p. 430).

This week, the Learning Resources will support you in fulfilling that sizable requirement. Although there is no assignment, devote ample time to these resources on pediatric skin conditions. Your understanding will be tested in both the Module 2 Knowledge Check and the Midterm Exam this week.

Learning Objectives

Students will:

  • Identify key terms, principles, and concepts related to the primary care of pediatric patients with ear, eye, nose, and throat conditions, respiratory and cardiovascular conditions, and skin conditions
  • Synthesize key terms, concepts, and principles related to the primary care of pediatric patients

Learning Resources

Required Readings (click to expand/reduce)
Required Media (click to expand/reduce)

Knowledge Check: Module 2: EENT, Respiratory and Cardiovascular, and Dermatology

Photo Credit: Getty Images/iStockphoto

Module 2 comes to a close this week, and to gauge your understanding of the key topics in this module, you have your second Knowledge Check of 20 questions to answer. Recall your experience with the Module 1 Knowledge Check in Week 3 and, as needed, alter your approach to reviewing the Learning Resources or plan ahead to ensure you schedule the exercise for a time of day when you perform best. Keep in mind this formative practice is intended to help you prepare for the Midterm and Final exams in this course, and ultimately, your certification exam for Family Nurse Practitioner.

Note: With your Midterm Exam also this week, you are strongly encouraged to complete the Module 2 Knowledge Check at least 48 hours before you take the Midterm.

To prepare:

  • Review Weeks 4–6 Learning Resources, using the topic list, below, as a guide.
  • Module 2 Knowledge Check topics will include the following:
    • Types of ear, eye, nose, and throat (EENT) conditions
    • Diagnosis, treatment, and management of EENT conditions
    • Signs of respiratory conditions
    • Signs of cardiovascular conditions
    • Diagnosis, treatment, and management of respiratory conditions
    • Diagnosis, treatment, and management of cardiovascular conditions
    • Types of skin conditions
    • Diagnosis, treatment, and management of skin conditions
    • Socio-cultural considerations in treating/working with patients and families
    • Evidence-based strategies for patient/family health promotion and education

Knowledge Check

You are required to answer 20 questions, randomly selected. You will have 1 attempt for each question. Each question is worth 1 point.

By Day 5 of Week 6

Complete and submit your Knowledge Check.

Submission Information

Submit Your Knowledge Check by Day 5

To submit your Knowledge Check:

Week 6 Knowledge Check


Midterm Exam

 

Photo Credit: [triloks]/[E+]/Getty Images

This 100-question exam will include topics covered in Weeks 1–6. It is designed to test your knowledge in preparation for your Family Nurse Practitioner certification exam and also simulates the conditions you will experience in that testing environment. No outside resources, including books, notes, websites, or any other type of resource, are to be used to complete this exam. You are expected to comply with Walden University’s Code of Conduct.

In advance of the exam, review the Learning Resources from Weeks 1–6 and the study guide provided by your Instructor. Aim to create optimal conditions for you as a test-taker, such as being well rested, free of distractions, and in a comfortable environment. NRNP – 6541 Primary Care of Adolescents & Children

This exam is timed with a limit of 150 minutes for completion.

By Day 7 of Week 6

Complete and submit your Midterm Exam.

Submission Information

Submit Your Midterm Exam by Day 7

To submit your Midterm Exam:

Week 6 Midterm Exam


What’s Coming Up in Module 3?

 

Photo Credit: [BrianAJackson]/[iStock / Getty Images Plus]/Getty Images

Next week, you will begin Module 3. You will continue to focus on specific conditions that affect particular structures and systems of the body, with attention to those that affect children and adolescents. Week 7 addresses gastrointestinal conditions, which is likely to be a common complaint among your pediatric patients.

i-Human Case Study

You will have another i-Human Case Study next week, this time addressing gastrointestinal conditions in pediatric patients. By now you may be feeling very comfortable “seeing” patients in the i-Human platform. Focus on any differences that you expect to experience in working with actual human children, adolescents, and their families. Consider how you can maximize the i-Human experience to enhance your preparation. Also, if there are technical aspects of the i-Human platform that are still challenging, consult the i-Human Manual or colleagues for support.

 

Photo Credit: Getty Images/iStockphoto

Week 7: Evaluation and Management of Gastrointestinal Conditions

Consider aspects of daily life that we focus on most, and certainly high on the list, if not at the very top of the chart, is food. Our first concern may be how to have adequate food or nourishing food or food that just tastes really good. Whatever the priority, food is pretty much understood by everyone to be a need worthy of our full attention at least three times a day.

Food, as well as water, are essential to life, and nutritious options in particular. But intake of food, water, and other liquids is not enough. The body also must have a well-functioning digestive system to extract the nutrients to feed the cells and produce the energy for all systems to operate. For children, this is especially critical to ensure optimum growth and development.

When it functions normally, the pediatric digestive system runs smoothly. However, for just about every child, there are days when it does not; for some children, disruptively often. Gastrointestinal (GI) disorders are common complaints in patients from babies to teens. Problems may range from an isolated illness, to chronic issues such as lactose or gluten intolerance, to injuries or malformations of the organs necessary for digestion.

Working with families to address GI conditions in children and adolescents can be particularly challenging when management interferes with family food and beverage preferences or involves extreme diligence in choice and preparation. Be mindful of the socio-cultural diversity of your pediatric families and the role that food, including amount, plays in a family’s understanding of “good care” of infants and toddlers, of physical and cognitive development as children grow. Also be aware of how deep stressors such as food insecurity can impact how well families can maintain GI treatment and management plans.

This week the Learning Resources and the i-Human Case Study Assignment will help you prepare for treating pediatric patients with gastrointestinal conditions and supporting their families with targeted advice or comprehensive education.

Learning Objectives

Students will:

  • Assess pediatric patients with signs of gastrointestinal conditions
  • Evaluate health conditions of pediatric patients
  • Formulate differential diagnoses for pediatric gastrointestinal conditions
  • Analyze socio-cultural needs of pediatric patients and families
  • Formulate evidence-based treatment and management plans for pediatric patients with gastrointestinal conditions
  • Recommend evidence-based strategies for educating patients and families on treatment and management of gastrointestinal conditions

Learning Resources

Required Readings (click to expand/reduce)
Required Media (click to expand/reduce)

Assignment: i-Human Case Study: Evaluation and Management of Gastrointestinal Conditions

 

Photo Credit: Getty Images

Think ahead to the pediatric patients and families you may meet in this i-Human Case Study Assignment and, based on the Learning Resources, the types of gastrointestinal conditions that may be waiting for you in your virtual office on the i-Human platform. Have in mind GI conditions that you would particularly like to address in the avatar setting. Also reflect on your previous i-Human case studies and consider a child of an age, race, or ethnicity that you have not yet examined and would expand your experience to do so this week.

To prepare:

  • Review this week’s Learning Resources. Consider how to apply knowledge of gastrointestinal conditions and understanding of socio-cultural family needs to assessing, diagnosing, and treating pediatric patients.
  • Access i-Human Patients from this week’s Learning Resources and review the i-Human Case Study. Based on the provided patient information, think about the health history you would need to collect from the patient.
  • Consider what physical exams and diagnostic tests would be appropriate to gather more information about the patient’s condition. Reflect on how the results would be used to make a diagnosis.
  • Identify 3–5 possible conditions that may be considered in a differential diagnosis for the patient.
  • Consider the patient’s diagnosis. Think about clinical guidelines that might support this diagnosis.
  • Develop a treatment plan for the patient that includes health promotion and patient education strategies for pediatric patients with gastrointestinal conditions and their families.

The Assignment:

As you interact with the i-Human patient, complete the assigned case study. For guidance on using i-Human, refer to the i-Human Graduate Programs Help link within the i-Human platform.

By Day 7 of Week 7

Complete your Assignment in i-Human.

Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:

Week 7 Assignment Rubric


What’s Coming Up in Week 8?

 

Photo Credit: [BrianAJackson]/[iStock / Getty Images Plus]/Getty Images

Next week, you will investigate common renal and genitourinary (GU) conditions in pediatric patients. Take time to reflect on what you learned and experienced in Week 7 and how your understanding of GI conditions related to dehydration and elimination can support your work in Week 8.

i-Human Case Study

 

Photo Credit: Getty Images/iStockphoto

Next week, you will complete an i-Human Case Study Assignment on renal and GU conditions in children and adolescents. Be sure to address any continuing technical issues in using the i-Human platform, to get the most content and practical value from this Assignment.

Week 8: Evaluation and Management of Renal and Genitourinary Conditions

As a nurse or as an individual, you may have topics that are easier to discuss than others. From your perspective, there may be body systems easier to examine and explain with pediatric patients and families than others. Much may depend on a patient’s age and the dynamic between family members. For older children and adolescents, talk of difficulty with urination, for males and females, can be awkward and getting necessary details to aid evaluation and diagnosis may take particular sensitivity and finesse.

Renal and genitourinary (GU) conditions can vary from easily treatable infections to more serious concerns with kidney function and the capacity of the genitourinary system to do its work of supporting metabolism and expelling toxins. Renal or GU issues can also cause hypertension in children, signaling trouble and compounding it too. Primary care providers are often the first to assess and diagnose renal and GU disorders that necessitate further attention.

In addition to GU conditions, the text reading also covers gynecologic disorders that may present in girls and young women among your primary care patients. Early or late onset of menstruation, vaginal infections, and sexually transmitted diseases may require delicate discussions with younger and older adolescents, to offer instruction and guidance.

This week your Learning Resources and i-Human Case Study Assignment address renal and GU conditions. Consider how to frame questions to gather health histories and clear understanding of symptoms, and how to explain treatment and management plans with clarity while easing potential embarrassment. Use the avatar patient and family to focus on both identifying conditions and building rapport.

Learning Objectives

Students will:

  • Assess pediatric patients with signs of renal and genitourinary conditions
  • Evaluate health conditions of pediatric patients
  • Formulate differential diagnoses for pediatric renal and genitourinary conditions
  • Analyze socio-cultural needs of pediatric patients and families
  • Formulate evidence-based treatment and management plans for pediatric patients with renal and genitourinary conditions
  • Recommend evidence-based strategies for educating patients and families on treatment and management of renal and genitourinary conditions

Learning Resources

Required Readings (click to expand/reduce)
Required Media (click to expand/reduce)

Assignment: i-Human Case Study: Evaluation and Management of Renal and Genitourinary Conditions

 

Photo Credit: Photographee.eu / Adobe Stock

As you prepare for this i-Human Case Study, reflect on your prior case studies and feedback you have received. Focus on what to strengthen or improve in your examination process and procedures. As you consider possible renal and genitourinary conditions you may address, identify particular issues or patient ages of greatest interest or concern to you. In short, do the most to maximize this experience in any and all ways.

To prepare:

  • Review this week’s Learning Resources. Consider how to apply knowledge of renal and genitourinary conditions and understanding of socio-cultural family needs to assessing, diagnosing, and treating pediatric patients.
  • Access i-Human from this week’s Learning Resources and review the i-Human Case Study. Based on the provided patient information, think about the health history you would need to collect from the patient.
  • Consider what physical exams and diagnostic tests would be appropriate to gather more information about the patient’s condition. Reflect on how the results would be used to make a diagnosis.
  • Identify 3–5 possible conditions that may be considered in a differential diagnosis for the patient.
  • Consider the patient’s diagnosis. Think about clinical guidelines that might support this diagnosis.
  • Develop a treatment plan for the patient that includes health promotion and patient education strategies for patients with renal and genitourinary conditions and their families. NRNP – 6541 Primary Care of Adolescents & Children

Assignment:

As you interact with the i-Human patient, complete the assigned case study. For guidance on using i-Human, refer to the i-Human Patients Case Player Student Manual in the Learning Resources.

By Day 7 of Week 8

Complete your Assignment in i-Human.

Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:

Week 8 Assignment Rubric


What’s Coming Up in Week 9?

 

Photo Credit: [BrianAJackson]/[iStock / Getty Images Plus]/Getty Images

Next week you will complete Module 3 as you explore pediatric hematological, and metabolic and endocrine conditions. Plan your time to devote sufficient attention these topics while also preparing for the Knowledge Check in Week 9.

Knowledge Check

Next week, you will take the Module 3 Knowledge Check. This formative assessment will include questions pertaining to content from Weeks 7–9. From the previous Knowledge Checks you may have developed an approach to review that works well. Reflect on your comfort and challenges with the content in Weeks 7 and 8 and plan accordingly.

 

Petunia Park Case Study – NRNP 6665 Week 4 Assignment

Petunia Park Case Study – NRNP 6665 Week 4 Assignment

petunia park case study – NRNP 6665 Week 4 Assignment

Focused Soap psychiatric evaluation Examplar ( Please this is just an example/template to follow. Do not copy)

INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO USE EXEMPLAR AND TEMPLATE—READ CAREFULLY

If you are struggling with the format or remembering what to include, follow the Focused SOAP Note Evaluation Template AND the Rubric as your guide. petunia park case study – NRNP 6665 Week 4 Assignment It is also helpful to review the rubric in detail in order not to lose points unnecessarily because you missed something required.  After reviewing full details of the rubric, you can use it as a guide.

ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED SOLUTION PAPERS

In the Subjective section, provide:

  • Chief complaint
  • History of present illness (HPI)
  • Past psychiatric history
  • Medication trials and current medications
  • Psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis
  • Pertinent substance use, family psychiatric/substance use, social, and medical history
  • Allergies
  • ROS

Read rating descriptions to see the grading standards! 

In the Objective section, provide:

  • Physical exam documentation of systems pertinent to the chief complaint, HPI, and history
  • Diagnostic results, including any labs, imaging, or other assessments needed to develop the differential diagnoses. petunia park case study – NRNP 6665 Week 4 Assignment

Read rating descriptions to see the grading standards!

 

WAL_NRNP6665_04_A_EN-CC (6)

Depression Premenstrual dysphoric disorder Seasonal affective disorder (MDD with Seasonal Variation)
agomelatine
amitriptyline
amoxapine
aripiprazole
(adjunct)
brexpiprazole (adjunct)bupropion
citalopram
clomipramine
cyamemazine
desipramine
desvenlafaxine
dothiepindoxepin
duloxetine
escitalopram
fluoxetine
fluvoxamine
iloperidone
imipramine
isocarboxazid
ketamine
lithium (adjunct)
l-methylfolate (adjunct)
lofepramine
maprotiline
mianserin
milnacipran
mirtazapine
moclobemide
nefazodone
nortriptyline
paroxetine
phenelzine
protriptyline quetiapine (adjunct)
reboxetine
selegiline
sertindole
sertraline
sulpiride
tianeptine
tranylcypromine
trazodone
trimipramine
venlafaxine
vilazodone
vortioxetine
citalopram
desvenlafaxine
duloxetin
eescitalopram
fluoxetin
eparoxetine
pepexev
sarafe,
sertraline
venlafaxinepetunia park case study – NRNP 6665 Week 4 Assignment
Bupropion HCL extended-release
Bipolar depression Bipolar disorder (mixed Mania/Depression Bipolar maintenance Mania
lithium (used with lurasidone)
lurasidone
olanzapine-fluoxetine combination (symbyax)
quetiapine
valproate (divalproex) (used with lurasidone)
aripiprazole
asenapine
carbamazepine
olanzapine
ziprasidone
aripiprazole 

lamotrigine
lithium
olanzapine

aripiprazole
asenapine
carbamazepine
lithium
olanzapine
quetiapine
risperidonevalproate (divalproex)
ziprasidone

In the Assessment section, provide:

  • Results of the mental status examination, presented in paragraph form.
  • At least three differentials with supporting evidence. List them from top priority to least priority. petunia park case study – NRNP 6665 Week 4 Assignment Compare the DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for each differential diagnosis and explain what DSM-5 criteria rules out the differential diagnosis to find an accurate diagnosis. Explain the critical-thinking process that led you to the primary diagnosis you selected. Include pertinent positives and pertinent negatives for the specific patient case.
  • Read rating descriptions to see the grading standards!

Reflect on this case. Include: Discuss what you learned and what you might do differently. Also include in your reflection a discussion related to legal/ethical considerations (demonstrate critical thinking beyond confidentiality and consent for treatment!), health promotion and disease prevention taking into consideration patient factors (such as age, ethnic group, etc.), PMH, and other risk factors (e.g., socioeconomic, cultural background, etc.) petunia park case study – NRNP 6665 Week 4 Assignment.

(The FOCUSED SOAP psychiatric evaluation is typically the follow-up visit patient note. You will practice writing this type of note in this course. You will be focusing more on the symptoms from your differential diagnosis from the comprehensive psychiatric evaluation narrowing to your diagnostic impression. You will write up what symptoms are present and what symptoms are not present from illnesses to demonstrate you have indeed assessed for illnesses which could be impacting your patient. petunia park case study – NRNP 6665 Week 4 Assignment. For example, anxiety symptoms, depressive symptoms, bipolar symptoms, psychosis symptoms, substance use, etc.)

ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED SOLUTION PAPERS

EXEMPLAR BEGINS HERE

Subjective:

CC (chief complaint): A brief statement identifying why the patient is here. This statement is verbatim of the patient’s own words about why presenting for assessment. For a patient with dementia or other cognitive deficits, this statement can be obtained from a family member.

HPI: Begin this section with patient’s initials, age, race, gender, purpose of evaluation, current medication and referral reason. For example: petunia park case study – NRNP 6665 Week 4 Assignment

N.M. is a 34-year-old Asian male presents for medication management follow up for anxiety. He was initiated sertraline last appt which he finds was effective for two weeks then symptoms began to return.

Or

P.H., a 16-year-old Hispanic female, presents for follow up to discuss previous psychiatric evaluation for concentration difficulty. She is not currently prescribed psychotropic medications as we deferred until further testing and screening was conducted.

Then, this section continues with the symptom analysis for your note. Thorough documentation in this section is essential for patient care, coding, and billing analysis.

Paint a picture of what is wrong with the patient. First what is bringing the patient to your follow up evaluation? Document symptom onset, duration, frequency, severity, and impact. What has worsened or improved since last appointment? What stressors are they facing? Your description here will guide your differential diagnoses into your diagnostic impression. You are seeking symptoms that may align with many DSM-5 diagnoses, narrowing to what aligns with diagnostic criteria for mental health and substance use disorders.

Substance Use History: This section contains any history or current use of caffeine, nicotine, illicit substance (including marijuana), and alcohol. Include the daily amount of use and last known use. Include type of use such as inhales, snorts, IV, etc. Include any histories of withdrawal complications from tremors, Delirium Tremens, or seizures. petunia park case study – NRNP 6665 Week 4 Assignment.

Current Medications: Include dosage, frequency, length of time used, and reason for use. Also include OTC or homeopathic products.

Allergies: Include medication, food, and environmental allergies separately. Provide a description of what the allergy is (e.g., angioedema, anaphylaxis). This will help determine a true reaction vs. intolerance.

Reproductive Hx: Menstrual history (date of LMP), Pregnant (yes or no), Nursing/lactating (yes or no), contraceptive use (method used), types of intercourse:  oral, anal, vaginal, other, any sexual concerns

ROS: Cover all body systems that may help you include or rule out a differential diagnosis.  Please note: THIS IS DIFFERENT from a physical examination!

You should list each system as follows: General: HeadEENT: etc. You should list these in bullet format and document the systems in order from head to toe.

Example of Complete ROS:

GENERAL: No weight loss, fever, chills, weakness, or fatigue.

HEENT: Eyes: No visual loss, blurred vision, double vision, or yellow sclerae. Ears, Nose, Throat: No hearing loss, sneezing, congestion, runny nose, or sore throat.

SKIN: No rash or itching.

CARDIOVASCULAR: No chest pain, chest pressure, or chest discomfort. No palpitations or edema.

RESPIRATORY: No shortness of breath, cough, or sputum. petunia park case study – NRNP 6665 Week 4 Assignment.

GASTROINTESTINAL: No anorexia, nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea. No abdominal pain or blood.

GENITOURINARY: Burning on urination, urgency, hesitancy, odor, odd color

NEUROLOGICAL: No headache, dizziness, syncope, paralysis, ataxia, numbness, or tingling in the extremities. No change in bowel or bladder control. petunia park case study – NRNP 6665 Week 4 Assignment

MUSCULOSKELETAL: No muscle, back pain, joint pain, or stiffness.

HEMATOLOGIC: No anemia, bleeding, or bruising.

LYMPHATICS: No enlarged nodes. No history of splenectomy.

ENDOCRINOLOGIC: No reports of sweating, cold, or heat intolerance. No polyuria or polydipsia.

Objective:

Diagnostic results: Include any labs, X-rays, or other diagnostics that are needed to develop the differential diagnoses (support with evidenced and guidelines) petunia park case study – NRNP 6665 Week 4 Assignment.

Assessment:

Mental Status Examination: For the purposes of your courses, this section must be presented in paragraph form and not use of a checklist! This section you will describe the patient’s appearance, attitude, behavior, mood and affect, speech, thought processes, thought content, perceptions (hallucinations, pseudohallucinations, illusions, etc.)., cognition, insight, judgment, and SI/HI. See an example below. You will modify to include the specifics for your patient on the above elements—DO NOT just copy the example. You may use a preceptor’s way of organizing the information if the MSE is in paragraph form. Petunia Park Case Study – NRNP 6665 Week 4 Assignment

He is an 8-year-old African American male who looks his stated age. He is cooperative with examiner. He is neatly groomed and clean, dressed appropriately. There is no evidence of any abnormal motor activity. His speech is clear, coherent, normal in volume and tone. His thought process is goal directed and logical. There is no evidence of looseness of association or flight of ideas. His mood is euthymic, and his affect appropriate to his mood. He was smiling at times in an appropriate manner. He denies any auditory or visual hallucinations. There is no evidence of any delusional thinking.   He denies any current suicidal or homicidal ideation. Cognitively, he is alert and oriented. His recent and remote memory is intact. His concentration is good. His insight is good petunia park case study – NRNP 6665 Week 4 Assignment.

Diagnostic Impression: You must begin to narrow your differential diagnosis to your diagnostic impression.  You must explain how and why (your rationale) you ruled out any of your differential diagnoses. You must explain how and why (your rationale) you concluded to your diagnostic impression.  You will use supporting evidence from the literature to support your rationale. Include pertinent positives and pertinent negatives for the specific patient case.

Also included in this section is the reflection. Reflect on this case and discuss whether or not you agree with your preceptor’s assessment and diagnostic impression of the patient and why or why not. What did you learn from this case? What would you do differently?

Also include in your reflection a discussion related to legal/ethical considerations (demonstrating critical thinking beyond confidentiality and consent for treatment!), health promotion and disease prevention taking into consideration patient factors (such as age, ethnic group, etc.), PMH, and other risk factors (e.g., socioeconomic, cultural background, etc.).

Case Formulation and Treatment Plan

Includes documentation of diagnostic studies that will be obtained, referrals to other health care providers, therapeutic interventions including psychotherapy and/or psychopharmacology, education, disposition of the patient, and any planned follow-up visits. Each diagnosis or condition documented in the assessment should be addressed in the plan. The details of the plan should follow an orderly manner.  *See an example below. You will modify to your practice so there may be information excluded/included. If you are completing this for a practicum, what does your preceptor document?

Risks and benefits of medications are discussed including non- treatment. Potential side effects of medications discussed (be detailed in what side effects discussed). Informed client not to stop medication abruptly without discussing with providers. Instructed to call and report any adverse reactions. Discussed risk of medication with pregnancy/fetus, encouraged birth control, discussed if does become pregnant to inform provider as soon as possible. Discussed how some medications might decreased birth control pill, would need back up method (exclude for males) petunia park case study – NRNP 6665 Week 4 Assignment.

 

Discussed risks of mixing medications with OTC drugs, herbal, alcohol/illegal drugs. Instructed to avoid this practice. Encouraged abstinence. petunia park case study – NRNP 6665 Week 4 Assignment . Discussed how drugs/alcohol affect mental health, physical health, sleep architecture.

 

Initiation of (list out any medication and why prescribed, any therapy services or referrals to specialist):

 

Client was encouraged to continue with case management and/or therapy services (if not provided by you)

 

Client has emergency numbers:  Emergency Services 911, the  Client’s Crisis Line 1-800-_______. Client instructed to go to nearest ER or call 911 if they become actively suicidal and/or homicidal petunia park case study – NRNP 6665 Week 4 Assignment. (only if you or preceptor provided them)

 

Reviewed hospital records/therapist records for collaborative information; Reviewed PMP report (only if actually completed)

 

Time allowed for questions and answers provided. Provided supportive listening. Client appeared to understand discussion. Client is amenable with this plan and agrees to follow treatment regimen as discussed. (this relates to informed consent; you will need to assess their understanding and agreement)

 

Follow up with PCP as needed and/or for:

 

Labs ordered and/or reviewed (write out what diagnostic test ordered, rationale for ordering, and if discussed fasting/non fasting or other patient education) petunia park case study – NRNP 6665 Week 4 Assignment

 

Return to clinic:

Continued treatment is medically necessary to address chronic symptoms, improve functioning, and prevent the need for a higher level of care.

 

References (move to begin on next page)

You are required to include at least three evidence-based, peer-reviewed journal articles or evidenced-based guidelines which relate to this case to support your diagnostics and differentials diagnoses petunia park case study – NRNP 6665 Week 4 Assignment. Be sure to use correct APA 7th edition formatting.

 

In this Assignment you will assess, diagnose, and devise a treatment plan for a patient in a case study who is presenting with a mood disorder.

To Prepare

  • Review this week’s Learning Resources. Consider the insights they provide about assessing, diagnosing, and treating mood disorders.
  • Review the Focused SOAP Note template, which you will use to complete this Assignment. There is also a Focused SOAP Note Exemplar provided as a guide for Assignment expectations.
  • Review the video, Case Study: Petunia Park. You will use this case as the basis of this Assignment. In this video, a Walden faculty member is assessing a mock patient. The patient will be represented onscreen as an avatar.
  • Consider what history would be necessary to collect from this patient. petunia park case study – NRNP 6665 Week 4 Assignment
  • Consider what interview questions you would need to ask this patient.

The Assignment

Develop a Focused SOAP Note, including your differential diagnosis and critical-thinking process to formulate a primary diagnosis. Incorporate the following into your responses in the template:

  • Subjective: What details did the patient provide regarding their chief complaint and symptomatology to derive your differential diagnosis? What is the duration and severity of their symptoms? How are their symptoms impacting their functioning in life?
  • Objective: What observations did you make during the psychiatric assessment?
  • Assessment:Discuss the patient’s mental status examination results. What were your differential diagnoses? Provide a minimum of three possible diagnoses with supporting evidence, listed in order from highest to lowest priority. Compare the DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for each differential diagnosis and explain what DSM-5 criteria rules out the differential diagnosis to find an accurate diagnosis. Explain the critical-thinking process that led you to the primary diagnosis you selected. Include pertinent positives and pertinent negatives for the specific patient case.
  • Plan:What is your plan for psychotherapy? What is your plan for treatment and management, including alternative therapies? Include pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments, alternative therapies, and follow-up parameters as well as a rationale for this treatment and management plan. Also incorporate one health promotion activity and one patient education strategy. petunia park case study – NRNP 6665 Week 4 Assignment
  • Reflection notes:What would you do differently with this client if you could conduct the session again? Discuss what your next intervention would be if you were able to follow up with this patient. Also include in your reflection a discussion related to legal/ethical considerations (demonstrate critical thinking beyond confidentiality and consent for treatment!), health promotion, and disease prevention that takes into consideration patient factors (such as age, ethnic group, etc.), PMH, and other risk factors (e.g., socioeconomic, cultural background, etc.).

 

Novice Competent Proficient New Column4
Create documentation in the Focused SOAP Note Template about the patient in the case study. 

In the Subjective section, provide:

• Chief complaint

• History of present illness (HPI)

• Past psychiatric history

• Medication trials and current medications

• Psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis

• Pertinent substance use, family psychiatric/substance use, social, and medical history

• Allergies

• ROS

14 (14%) – 15 (15%) 

The response throughly and accurately describes the patient’s subjective complaint, history of present illness, past psychiatric history, medication trials and current medications, psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis, pertinent histories, allergies, and review of all systems that would inform a differential diagnosis. petunia park case study – NRNP 6665 Week 4 Assignment

12 (12%) – 13 (13%) 

The response accurately describes the patient’s subjective complaint, history of present illness, past psychiatric history, medication trials and current medications, psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis, pertinent histories, allergies, and review of all systems that would inform a differential diagnosis.

11 (11%) – 11 (11%) 

The response describes the patient’s subjective complaint, history of present illness, past psychiatric history, medication trials and current medications, psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis, pertinent histories, allergies, and review of all systems that would inform a differential diagnosis but is somewhat vague or contains minor inaccuracies. petunia park case study – NRNP 6665 Week 4 Assignment

0 (0%) – 10 (10%) 

The response provides an incomplete or inaccurate description of the patient’s subjective complaint, history of present illness, past psychiatric history, medication trials and current medications, psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis, pertinent histories, allergies, and review of all systems that would inform a differential diagnosis. Or the subjective documentation is missing.

In the Objective section, provide: 

• Physical exam documentation of systems pertinent to the chief complaint, HPI, and history

• Diagnostic results, including any labs, imaging, or other assessments needed to develop the differential diagnoses

14 (14%) – 15 (15%) 

The response thoroughly and accurately documents the patient’s physical exam for pertinent systems. Diagnostic tests and their results are thoroughly and accurately documented. Petunia Park Case Study – NRNP 6665 Week 4 Assignment

12 (12%) – 13 (13%) 

The response accurately documents the patient’s physical exam for pertinent systems. Diagnostic tests and their results are accurately documented. petunia park case study – NRNP 6665 Week 4 Assignment

11 (11%) – 11 (11%) 

Documentation of the patient’s physical exam is somewhat vague or contains minor innacuracies. Diagnostic tests and their results are documented but contain minor innacuracies.

0 (0%) – 10 (10%) 

The response provides incomplete or inaccurate documentation of the patient’s physical exam. Systems may have been unnecessarily reviewed. Or the objective documentation is missing.

In the Assessment section, provide: 

• Results of the mental status examination, presented in paragraph form

• At least three differentials with supporting evidence. List them from top priority to least priority. Compare the DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for each differential diagnosis and explain what DSM-5 criteria rules out the differential diagnosis to find an accurate diagnosis. Explain the critical-thinking process that led you to the primary diagnosis you selected. Include pertinent positives and pertinent negatives for the specific patient case.

18 (18%) – 20 (20%) 

The response thoroughly and accurately documents the results of the mental status exam.

Response lists at least three distinctly different and detailed possible disorders in order of priority for a differential diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study, and it provides a thorough, accurate, and detailed justification for each of the disorders selected.

16 (16%) – 17 (17%) 

The response accurately documents the results of the mental status exam.

Response lists at least three distinctly different and detailed possible disorders in order of priority for a differential diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study, and it provides an accurate justification for each of the disorders selected.

14 (14%) – 15 (15%) 

The response documents the results of the mental status exam with some vagueness or innacuracy.

Response lists at least three different possible disorders for a differential diagnosis of the patient and provides a justification for each, but may contain some vagueness or innacuracy.

0 (0%) – 13 (13%) 

The response provides an incomplete or inaccurate description of the results of the mental status exam and explanation of the differential diagnoses. Or the assessment documentation is missing.

In the Plan section, provide: 

• Your plan for psychotherapy

• Your plan for treatment and management, including alternative therapies. Include pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments, alternative therapies, and follow-up parameters as well as a rationale for this treatment and management plan.

• Incorporate one health promotion activity and one patient education strategy.

23 (23%) – 25 (25%) 

The response provides an evidence-based, detailed, and appropriate plan for psychotherapy for the patient.

The response provides an evidence-based, detailed, and appropriate plan for treatment and management, including pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments, alternative therapies, and follow-up parameters. A strong rationale for the plan is provided that demonstrates critical thinking and content understanding.

The response includes at least one evidence-based health promotion activity and one evidence-based patient education strategy.

20 (20%) – 22 (22%) 

The response provides an evidence-based and appropriate plan for psychotherapy for the patient.

The response provides an evidence-based and appropriate plan for treatment and management, including pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments, alternative therapies, and follow-up parameters. An adequate rationale for the plan is provided.

The response includes at least one health promotion activity and one patient education strategy.

18 (18%) – 19 (19%) 

The response provides a somewhat vague or inaccurate plan for psychotherapy for the patient.

The response provides a somewhat vague or inaccurate plan for treatment and management, including pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments, alternative therapies, and follow-up parameters. The rationale for the plan is weak or general.

The response includes one health promotion activity and one patient education strategy, but it may contain some vagueness or innacuracy.

0 (0%) – 17 (17%) 

The response provides an incomplete or inaccurate plan for psychotherapy for the patient.

The response provides an incomplete or inaccurate plan for treatment and management, including pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments, alternative therapies, and follow-up parameters. The rationale for the plan is inaccurate or missing.

The health promotion and patient education strategies are incomplete or missing.

• Reflect on this case. Discuss what you learned and what you might do differently. Also include in your reflection a discussion related to legal/ethical considerations (demonstrate critical thinking beyond confidentiality and consent for treatment!), health promotion, and disease prevention that takes into consideration patient factors (such as age, ethnic group, etc.), PMH, and other risk factors (e.g., socioeconomic, cultural background, etc.). 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) 

Reflections are thorough, thoughtful, and demonstrate critical thinking.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%) 

Reflections demonstrate critical thinking.

3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) 

Reflections are somewhat general or do not demonstrate critical thinking.

0 (0%) – 3 (3%) 

Reflections are incomplete, inaccurate, or missing. petunia park case study – NRNP 6665 Week 4 Assignment

Provide at least three evidence-based, peer-reviewed journal articles or evidenced-based guidelines that relate to this case to support your diagnostics and differential diagnoses. Be sure they are current (no more than 5 years old). 9 (9%) – 10 (10%) 

The response provides at least three current, evidence-based resources from the literature to support the assessment and diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study. The resources reflect the latest clinical guidelines and provide strong justification for decision making.

8 (8%) – 8 (8%) 

The response provides at least three current, evidence-based resources from the literature that appropriately support the assessment and diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study.

7 (7%) – 7 (7%) 

Three evidence-based resources are provided to support the assessment and diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study, but they may only provide vague or weak justification.

0 (0%) – 6 (6%) 

Two or fewer resources are provided to support the assessment and diagnosis decisions. The resources may not be current or evidence based.

Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for parenthetical/in-text citations and reference list. 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) 

Uses correct APA format with no errors

4 (4%) – 4 (4%) 

Contains a few (one or two) APA format errors

3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) 

Contains several (three or four) APA format errors

0 (0%) – 3 (3%) 

Contains many (five or more) APA format errors

Written Expression and Formatting – English Writing Standards: 

Correct grammar, mechanics, and punctuation

5 (5%) – 5 (5%) 

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors

4 (4%) – 4 (4%) 

Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors

3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) 

Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors

0 (0%) – 3 (3%) 

Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding

Total Points: 100 petunia park case study – NRNP 6665 Week 4 Assignment

Name: NRNP_6665_Week4_Assignment_Rubric

Rubric petunia park case study – NRNP 6665 Week 4 Assignment

nursing role and scope

nursing role and scope

please answer the following questions. Each question must have at least 3 paragraphs and you must use at 3 least references (APA) included in your post.

Additionally, you are expected to reply to two other students and include a reference that justifies your post. Your reply must be at least 3 paragraphs.

1. Describe the importance of evidence-based practice.

2. Describe how and where to search for evidence.

3. Describe strategies for the implementation of evidenced-based practice in nursing practice.

This post is due by next Sunday, July 7th at 11:59pm.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW 

Interaction Between Nurse Informaticists and Other Specialists

Interaction Between Nurse Informaticists and Other Specialists

Interaction Between Nurse Informaticists and Other Specialists

Nurse informaticists routinely make sure all systems are maintained, and able to be utilized properly (McGonigle & Mastrian, 2017, p. 313). Within the Washington Health System, the nurse informaticists help with the orientation of new staff members. All workers who will be utilizing the computers go through their orientation. This orientation helps workers learn the computer system utilized and how to log on to the computer. They provide direct supervision while the staff performs tasks on the computer. There is a packet of step-by-step instructions on how to access and chart in the Sunrise computer system. These individuals interact directly with those who will be using the computers for their job. When the organization implements new technology nurse informaticists are on the floor, directly showing nurses how it operates. This direct observation helps nurses feel more comfortable with new technology and provides resources for questions. Nurse informaticists are focused on creating solutions to improve overall patient care (Mosier et al., 2019). They are responsible for making technology user friendly and without errors. Interaction Between Nurse Informaticists and Other Specialists

ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED SOLUTION PAPERS

One new technology advancement that we have had issues with is the ViTrac. When staff calls the technical support for the hospital, they try to address the issue over the phone. It would be easier if we could show them the issues we are experiencing. Having a person come over in person is less frustrating and many individuals feel heard. This is one strategy to improve the relationships between the different departments.

Technology is always changing. Healthcare especially, is seeing advancements in technology to help better care for the patient. The use of mobile phone and telehealth is becoming more common. Health apps are being utilized to help lower readmission rates for designated diseases (Ng et al., 2018). Nursing informaticists play a key role in the development and execution of healthcare-based technology. This specialty is becoming more essential every year as technology advances. We need these individuals to help advance technology services we can provide to patients. As new technology is developed every year, this role is crucial. I believe the advancement of new technologies will expand the current professional interactions. It will allow for physicians to remotely connect with other professionals to better care for the patient. The evolution of this role allows for more professional interactions to occur. It will also cause many professional interactions to occur remotely. While this aspect can be positive in many ways, the lack of actual in person communication is lost. Especially during these times, many people need some form of human interaction after quarantining for months. Nurse informaticists are a great tool for advancing healthcare and improving care for patients. Interaction Between Nurse Informaticists and Other Specialists

References

McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. G. (2017). Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge (4th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.

Mosier, S., Roberts, W. D., & Englebright, J. (2019). A system-level method for developing nursing informatics and solutions: The role of executive leadership. The Journal of Nursing Administration, 49(11), 543-548. 10.1097/NNA.0000000000000815

Ng, Y. C., Alexander, S., & Frith, K. H. (2018). Integration of mobile health applications in health information technology initiatives: Expanding opportunities for nurse participation in population health. Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 36(5), 209-213. 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000445

 

response post

I agree that nursing informatics is a necessary tool for the advancement of the quality of care and the nursing profession in its’ entirety. Recently, we have seen a huge shift in the healthcare with telehealth coming to the forefront due to the Affordable Care Act and more recently the coronavirus pandemic. There are several advantages to providing services remotely such as: convenience, cost savings, the ability to provide care to those who are immunocompromised or with mobility issues, and accessibility for those that live in rural areas.

According to Harvard Health, almost three-quarters of Americans surveyed said the pandemic has made them more eager to try virtual care, and one in four Americans over the age of 50 have had a virtual health visit during the first three months of the pandemic (2020). Telehealth is an umbrella term that covers telemedicine and a variety of nonphysician services, including telenursing and telepharmacy (Weinstein et al., 2014). Telehealth fundamentally changes the way patient care is delivered. Telephonic or virtual nursing allows nurses to monitor and deliver care to patients remotely. Nurse informaticists combine clinical and technical expertise to determine how to best meet the needs of the patient and organization. Nurse informaticists are critical in the success of telehealth as they play a significant role in the design and implementation of the systems utilized as well as the education of healthcare workers regarding the technology and biometric data that is used in order to treat patients virtually. As the population’s life expectancy continues to grow, the role of telehealth will become increasingly important as will the ability to utilize the technology in order to assess, communicate, and provide care for out patients virtually. Interaction Between Nurse Informaticists and Other Specialists

references

Harvard Health. (2020). Telehealth: The advantages and disadvantages. https://www.health.harvard.edu/staying-healthy/telehealth-the-advantages-and-disadvantages. Interaction Between Nurse Informaticists and Other Specialists

Weinstein, R. L., Lopez, A. M., Jospeh, B., Erps, K., Holcomb, M., Barker , G., & Krupinski, E. (2014, March). Telemedicine, Telehealth, and Mobile Health Applications That Work: Opportunities and Barriers. The American Journal of Medicine . http://scholar.google.com/scholar_url?url=http://www.academia.edu/download/42581191/Applications_that_work.pdf&hl=en&sa=X&ei=m43bX7j2GY-Ny9YPt6-10Ac&scisig=AAGBfm31zNtLDXJT_2-7S7hftARrTGuYww&nossl=1&oi=scholarr. Interaction Between Nurse Informaticists and Other Specialists

 

Discussion: Interaction Between Nurse Informaticists and Other Specialists

Nature offers many examples of specialization and collaboration. Ant colonies and bee hives are but two examples of nature’s sophisticated organizations. Each thrives because their members specialize by tasks, divide labor, and collaborate to ensure food, safety, and general well-being of the colony or hive. Interaction Between Nurse Informaticists and Other Specialists

Of course, humans don’t fare too badly in this regard either. And healthcare is a great example. As specialists in the collection, access, and application of data, nurse informaticists collaborate with specialists on a regular basis to ensure that appropriate data is available to make decisions and take actions to ensure the general well-being of patients.

In this Discussion, you will reflect on your own observations of and/or experiences with informaticist collaboration. You will also propose strategies for how these collaborative experiences might be improved. Interaction Between Nurse Informaticists and Other Specialists

To Prepare:

  • Review the Resources and reflect on the evolution of nursing informatics from a science to a nursing specialty.
  • Consider your experiences with nurse Informaticists or technology specialists within your healthcare organization.

By Day 3 of Week 3

Post a description of experiences or observations about how nurse informaticists and/or data or technology specialists interact with other professionals within your healthcare organization. Suggest at least one strategy on how these interactions might be improved. Be specific and provide examples. Then, explain the impact you believe the continued evolution of nursing informatics as a specialty and/or the continued emergence of new technologies might have on professional interactions. Interaction Between Nurse Informaticists and Other Specialistsv

By Day 6 of Week 3

Respond to at least two of your colleagues* on two different days, offering one or more additional interaction strategies in support of the examples/observations shared or by offering further insight to the thoughts shared about the future of these interactions.

ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED SOLUTION PAPERS

Interaction Between Nurse Informaticists and Other Specialists Sample 2

Information about Covid-19 is being intensely scrutinized throughout not only the healthcare organization that I work for, but also throughout the world, in an attempt to coordinate a massive response to try to contain the spread of the disease.  Data is being gathered by multiple professions and disciplines and analyzed with the intention of sharing the resulting knowledge with people and agencies responsible for making decisions regarding steps to take to protect the public from the disease.  Data that is being collected and shared on a regular basis at my place of work includes results from weekly staff and patient Covid-19 testing, daily staff and patient symptom reports, daily bed counts, and patient temperatures and vital signs each shift.  Interaction Between Nurse Informaticists and Other Specialists The information is gathered by nurses on the inpatient unit, it is shared verbally and electronically with doctors, administrators, building supervisors, and public health officials to make decisions regarding patient care and staffing.

One way to improve the efficient distribution of the information that is gathered on the inpatient unit would be to ensure that information is shared between disciplines and professions with compatible organizational approaches (Nordsteien & Bystrom, 2018).  Nursing on the inpatient unit needs to be aware of what specific information is being requested, and it must be reported in a manner that is accessible and easily understood by those requesting it.  Providing unnecessary information will only slow the analysis of information and delay effective interventions (Skiba, 2017) Interaction Between Nurse Informaticists and Other Specialists.

As nursing informatics continues to evolve into a nursing specialty, nurse’s interactions with other professionals will take on a collaborative role in the quest for improved patient outcomes.  Knowledge will be created from data, analyzed, shared among professions, and incorporated into the practice of multiple disciplines (McGonigle & Mastrian, 2017).

 

References

McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. (2017). Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge (4th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning. Interaction Between Nurse Informaticists and Other Specialists

Nordsteien, A., & Bystrom, K. (2018). Transitions in workplace information practices and culture: The influence of newcomers on information use in healthcare. Journal of Documentation74(4), 827–843. www.emeraldinsight.com/0022-0418.htm

Skiba, D. J. (2017). Nursing informatics education: From automation to connected care. In Forecasting informatics competencies for nurses in the future of connected health (pp. 9–19). IMIA; IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-738-2-9   Interaction Between Nurse Informaticists and Other Specialists

Community Nursing

Community Nursing

Health in the Global Community.

Women’s health.

Read chapter 15 and 17 of the class textbook and review the attached PowerPoint presentation. Once done, answer the following questions;

1. Describe globalization and international patterns of health and disease.

2. Identify international health care organizations and how they collaborate to improve global nursing and health care.

3. Identify and discuss the major indicators of women’s health.

4. Identify and discuss the barriers to adequate health care for women.

Present your assignment in an APA format word document, Arial 12 font. A minimum of 2 evidence-based references besides the class textbook must be used. A minimum of 700 words is required. Please make sure to follow the instructions as given.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW