Violence And Nursing Substance Abuse A Community Health Problem

Violence And Nursing Substance Abuse A Community Health Problem

Chapter 27 Violence Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

Overview of Violence Violence is a national public health problem.  WHO (2013) defines violence as “the intentional use of physical force or power, threatened or actual, against oneself, another person, or against a group or community which either results in or has a high likelihood of resulting in injury, death, psychological harm, maldevelopment, or deprivation.”  Injuries from violence are referred to as intentional injuries. Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 2 Factors That Contribute to Violence         Poverty, unemployment, economic dependency Substance abuse Dysfunctional family and/or social environment and lack of emotional support Mental Illness Media influence (e.g., violent video games, television shows, and movies) Access to firearms Political and/or religious ideology Intolerance and ignorance Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 3 History of Violence  Long history of human violence. ➢ In the Bible, Cain killed his brother Abel out of jealousy and anger ➢ Audience pleasure (e.g., gladiators in Rome) ➢ Infanticide—if child was female, a twin, sickly, or deformed ➢ Children, especially firstborn, sacrificed for religious reasons Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 4 History of Violence (Cont.)  Corporal punishment used to control children ➢ ➢ ➢  Spousal abuse/marital rape ➢ ➢ ➢  “Spare the rod and spoil the child” (Proverbs, 13:24) “Beating some sense into him” First legal protection in the United States in 1874 “Rule of thumb” “Wives be subject to your husband” (Ephesians, 5:22) Assault against women not explored until 1960s Elder abuse ➢ ➢ Often undetected because of lack of awareness of HCP Lack of mandatory reporting Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 5 Interpersonal Violence    Crosses all ethnic, racial, socioeconomic, and educational lines Interpersonal Violence (IPV) is about control, not anger. Includes: ➢ Homicide and suicide ➢ Intimate partner violence ➢ Child maltreatment Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 6 Interpersonal Violence: Homicide  Homicide ➢ One of the leading causes of death in the United States. • For black males aged 15 to 34, homicide is the leading cause of death. ➢ ➢ Young people, women, and African American and Hispanic males at higher risk than the general population. African Americans were more likely to commit homicide than whites and were more likely to be victims of homicide than whites (2010 data) Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 7 Interpersonal Violence: Suicide   Suicide is 10th leading cause of death for all Americans in all age groups (2010) More people die from suicide than homicide. ➢ ➢  Men often use firearms. Women use poisoning. In Native Americans and Alaska Natives, suicide is the second leading cause of death in persons 15 to 34 years of age. Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 8 Interpersonal Violence: Suicide (Cont.)  Risk factors for suicide ➢ Psychiatric disorders such as major depression, bipolar disorder, and/or schizophrenia ➢ Substance abuse ➢ Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) ➢ Bulimia or anorexia nervosa ➢ Past history of attempted suicide ➢ Genetic disposition to suicide ➢ Age, such as elderly, and white males (highest rate) Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 9 Interpersonal Violence: Partner  Intimate partner violence (IPV) ➢ ➢ ➢ A pattern of coercive behaviors perpetrated by someone who is or was in an intimate relationship with the victim May include battering, resulting in physical injury, psychological abuse, and sexual assault to progressive social isolation and intimidation of the victim Typically repetitive and often escalates in frequency and severity Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 10 Interpersonal Violence: Partner (Cont.)  Risk factors for IPV ➢ Low self-esteem ➢ Poverty ➢ Risky sexual behavior ➢ Eating disorders and/or depression ➢ Substance abuse ➢ Trust and relationship issues  Victims often suffer in silence and accept abuse as a transgenerational pattern of normal behavior Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 11 Interpersonal Violence: Partner (Cont.)  Pregnancy ➢ ➢ May increase stress within the family All pregnant women should be routinely screened for abuse for commons sign of IPV • Delay in seeking prenatal care • Unexplained bruising or damage to breasts or abdomen • Use of harmful substances (cigarettes, alcohol, drugs) • Recurring psychosomatic illnesses • Lack of participation in prenatal education Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 12 Interpersonal Violence: Dating  Abusive, controlling, or aggressive behavior in an intimate relationship that takes the form of emotional, verbal, physical, or sexual abuse ➢ ➢   May involve the use of date rape drugs Studies have linked alcohol with dating violence Stalking—a pattern of repeated and unwanted attention, contact, harassment, or any type of conduct directed at a person that instills fear Bullying—a repeated oppression, psychological or physical, of a less powerful person by a more powerful person or group of persons Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 13 Wheel of Power and Control Figure 27-1 Developed by the Domestic Abuse Intervention Project. 206 West Fourth Street, Duluth, MN 55806. Used with permission. Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 14 Impact of Interpersonal Violence  Victims often experience… ➢ ➢ ➢   Chronic fatigue and tension Disturbed sleeping and eating patterns Vague gastrointestinal and genitourinary complaints Misdiagnosis often occurs because of the obscurity of symptoms and/or failure to adequately assess Victims stay in abusive relationships because of cultural, religious, and economic factors Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 15 Impact of Interpersonal Violence (Cont.)  Victims who are most likely to leave a battering situation: ➢ Have resources and power ➢ No children ➢ No personal history of abuse (themselves or their mother)  Most dangerous time for victim is when he or she leaves or attempts to leave the relationship ➢ More likely to be killed at this time than any other time in the relationship Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 16 Interpersonal Violence: Child  Child maltreatment ➢ Most child maltreatment occurs within the family. ➢ More often abused by parents than other relatives or caregivers. ➢ More commonly seen in families in poverty, families in disorganization, or with parents who are younger and who are substance abusers. Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 17 Interpersonal Violence: Child (Cont.)  Child maltreatment ➢ Risk factors include but are not limited to • Special needs children • Children less than 4 years of age • Family history of violence • Substance abuse • Poverty • Social isolation Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 18 Interpersonal Violence: Child (Cont.)  Child maltreatment ➢ Four types of child abuse: 1. Neglect 2. Physical abuse • • Includes beating, burning, biting, and bruising Abusive head trauma/shaken baby syndrome is leading cause of death in the United States from abuse 3. Emotional abuse 4. Sexual abuse Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 19 Interpersonal Violence: Elderly  Elder abuse ➢ Society fails to recognize the cruelty many older adults experience. • Elders are an “invisible” segment of the population. ➢ Reasons for underreporting of elder abuse • Shame on part of victim • Social and physical isolation from resources • Failure of health care provider to routinely assess during points of contact • No uniform reporting system Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 20 Interpersonal Violence: Elderly (Cont.)  Elder abuse ➢ Types of abuse and neglect • Physical abuse • Psychological-emotional abuse • Sexual abuse • Neglect • Financial exploitation • Health care fraud and abuse Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 21 Community Violence   Community violence usually occurs suddenly and without warning and can potentially destroy entire segments of the population Community violence includes ➢ Workplace violence ➢ Youth violence ➢ Gang-related violence ➢ Hate crimes ➢ Terrorism Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 22 Community Violence: Workplace Workplace violence includes physical assaults, muggings, and verbal and written threats Risk factors include: ➢ Increasing number of acute and chronically mentally ill patients ➢ Working alone ➢ Availability of drugs at worksite ➢ Low staffing levels ➢ ➢ ➢ ➢ ➢ Poorly lit parking areas and corridors Long waits for service Inadequate security Increasing number of substance abusers Access to firearms Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 23 Community Violence: Youth  Youth-Related Violence ➢ ➢ ➢ ➢ Concentrated in minority communities and inner cities, causing a disproportionate burden on these communities Adolescents and youth increasingly use violence to settle disputes. Even when taught peaceful ways of resolving differences, learn by what they observe at home, on television, and in movies. Schools have become common sites for violence. Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 24 Risk Factors for Youth Violence (from Textbook, Table 27-3) Individual Risk Factors Involvement with drugs, alcohol, or tobacco Antisocial beliefs and attitudes Low IQ History of violent victimization History of early aggressive behavior Community Risk Factors Diminished economic opportunities High concentration of poor residents High level of family disruption Low levels of community participation Socially disorganized neighborhoods Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 25 Risk Factors for Youth Violence (from Textbook, Table 27-3—Cont.) Individual Risk Factors Attention deficits, hyperactivity, or learning disorders Poor behavioral control Deficits in social, cognitive or information-processing abilities Exposure to violence and conflict in the family High emotional distress History of treatment of emotional problems Community Risk Factors High level of transiency Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 26 Risk Factors for Youth Violence (from Textbook, Table 27-3—Cont.) Family Risk Factors Poor family functioning Low emotional attachment to parents of caregivers Low parental education and income Parental substance abuse or criminality Poor monitoring and supervision of children Harsh, lax, or inconsistent disciplinary practices Authoritarian childrearing practices Peer/Social Risk Factors Association with delinquent peers Involvement in gangs Social rejection by peers Lack of involvement in conventional activities Poor academic performance Low commitment to school and school failure Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 27 Community Violence: Gangs  Reasons that young people join gangs: ➢ Believe that gangs will protect them ➢ Peer pressure ➢ The need for respect ➢ A sense of belonging  Increasingly responsible for crimes and violence throughout the United States ➢ Crimes include illegal alien smuggling, armed robbery, assault, auto theft, drug and weapon trafficking, identity theft, and murder. Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 28 Community Violence: Prison  Prison violence ➢ ➢ ➢ ➢ The United States has one of the world’s highest rates of incarceration Inmates are both victims and perpetrators of violence. Includes allegations of physical abuse and reports of rape by corrections officers and inmates Little sympathy for this population for a variety of reasons, including indifference, disbelief, and denial Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 29 Community Violence: Trafficking   Human trafficking is a global problem and a public health issue. Involves: ➢ Prostitution ➢ Sexual exploitation ➢ Forced labor ➢ Slavery ➢ Removal of organs Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 30 Community Violence: Hate Crimes  Crimes in which offender is motivated by An individual’s race*1 ➢ Sexual orientation*3 ➢ Religious beliefs*2 ➢ Ethnic background ➢ National origin ➢ *Rank—most commonly reported  Hate crimes may include ➢ Murder ➢ Rape ➢ Sexual or physical assault ➢ Harassment ➢ Attacks on homes or on places of worship ➢ Vandalism Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 31 Community Violence: Terrorism  “The calculated use of unlawful violence or threat of unlawful violence to inculcate fear; intended to coerce or to intimidate governments or societies in the pursuit of goals that are generally political, religious, or ideological.” (Department of Defense)  All terrorist acts include at least three key elements—violence, fear, and intimidation. Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 32 Factors Influencing Violence  Firearms A gun in the home… • …triples the risk for homicide in the home • …increases the risk for suicide 3 to 5 times • …increases risk for accidental deaths by 4 ➢ Firearms are the number one weapon of choice in homicides in the United States. ➢ Direct and indirect costs are staggering. ➢ “Right to bear arms” arguments persist. ➢ Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 33 Factors Influencing Violence (Cont.)  Media violence includes exposure to and participation in … ➢ ➢ ➢  …violent video games …music and music videos that depict date rape or violence …virtual violence that allows subscribers to harm or kill victims Repeated exposure to media violence leads to emotional desensitization to real-life violence Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 34 Factors Influencing Violence (Cont.)  Mental illness is considered by many to be a major factor in violence. ➢  Studies are inconclusive that all violence is committed by mentally unstable persons. Increasing push for legislation to fund public health strategies that identify and treat mental illness across the country ➢ Funding issues have forced states to eliminate or reduce availability of mental health services Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 35 Violence Is a Public Health Epidemic   The public health system is challenged to go beyond its traditional programs to include prevention and management of violence. Efforts being made with ➢ ➢ ➢  Public health strategies Community approaches Local, state, and federal governments Addressed by Healthy People 2020 Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 36 Prevention of Violence: Primary Prevention   Goal: to stop violence, abuse, or neglect before it occurs Education may include life skills training: ➢ ➢ ➢  Parenting and family wellness Anger management Conflict resolution Nurses should: ➢ ➢ ➢ Increase awareness of violence Identify cases Work with the community Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 37 Prevention of Violence: Primary Prevention (Cont.)   Must begin at community level to change attitudes Focuses on stopping transgenerational aspect of abuse ➢ ➢   Start with young children Continue across the lifespan Mentoring and peer programs to promote healthy relationships and decrease conflict Work with high-risk individuals Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 38 Prevention of Violence: Secondary Prevention  Goal: assess, diagnose, and treat victims and perpetrators of violence. ➢   Consideration of safety of potential victim is critical Begins with assessment Once identified, victims must be offered… ➢ ➢ Resources to increase their safety Legal options and how to access them Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 39 Prevention of Violence: Secondary Prevention (Cont.)  Nurses must screen for abuse. Ask questions ➢ ➢ ➢   Within the last year, have you been hit, slapped, kicked, or otherwise physically hurt by someone? Since you’ve been pregnant, have you been hit, slapped, kicked, or otherwise physically hurt by someone? Within the last year, has anyone forced you to have sexual activities? Intervene when essential Interdisciplinary approach leads to optimal outcomes. Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 40 Prevention of Violence: Tertiary Prevention    Goal: Aimed at rehabilitation of individuals, families, groups, or communities and includes both victims and perpetrators of violence May take months or even years Nurses must work in conjunction with a variety of mental health professionals and social service agencies to provide coordinated care ➢ Self-care and recognition of own limitations and needs Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 41 Chapter 26 Substance Abuse Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. More deaths, illnesses, and disabilities are attributed to substance abuse than to any other preventable health conditions in the United States. – Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMSHA) Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 2 Social Consequences of Substance Abuse      Crimes while under the influence of drugs, alcohol, or both Need for money to buy substances Specific theft of drugs Almost 75% of inmates report prior drug use All aggregates in society are potentially affected by substance abuse problems regardless of age or economic level Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 3 Etiology of Substance Abuse  Numerous theories try to explain it ➢ Combination of many factors ➢ Genetics within families ➢ Individual (impulsivity and ease of disinhibition) ➢ Environmental factors ➢ Medical models ➢ Biopsychosocial models Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 4 Historical Overview of Alcohol and Illicit Drug Use   Alcohol use has gained more social acceptance than other drug use. Public attitudes and governmental policies have also influenced the history of illicit drug use. Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 5 Historical Overview of Alcohol and Illicit Drug Use (Cont.)  Consumption and laws affected by: ➢ ➢ ➢ ➢ ➢ ➢ ➢ ➢ Alcohol-related deaths after lowered drinking age Less tolerant national attitudes toward drinking Increased societal and legal pressures and actions against drinking and driving Increased health concerns among Americans Knowledge of addictive properties Counterculture acceptance of hallucinogens, cannabis, and heroin The “War on Drugs” Renewed interest in prevention/treatment efforts Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 6 Laws Impacting Substance Abuse  Anti–Drug Abuse Acts of 1986 and 1988 ➢ ➢ ➢  Increased funding for treatment and rehabilitation Created the Office of National Drug Control Policy (“drug czar”) Worked on a public health approach to drug control National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) ➢ Science on drug abuse and addiction • Prevention • Treatment • Decreasing the spread of HIV/AIDS • Other priority areas Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 7 Laws Impacting Substance Abuse (Cont.)  Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) ➢ Builds and sustains programs, policies, information and data, contracts, and grants toward helping the nation act on the knowledge that promotes behavioral health treatment through all levels of prevention Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 8 Prevalence, Incidence, and Trends  Alcohol use by persons aged 12 or older: ➢ Slightly more than half (52.8%) drink alcohol ➢ Binge drinking at least once in prior 30 days— (22.6%) ➢ Heavy drinking—6.2% ➢ Young adults ages 18-25 had highest prevalence of binge and heavy drinking—39.8% ➢ Drove under the influence of alcohol at least once in past year—11.1% – SAMHSA (2011) Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 9 Prevalence, Incidence, and Trends (Cont.)  Illicit drug use by persons aged 12 or older: ➢  About 8.7% were current drug users, used an illicit drug during the past month Illicit drugs used ➢ ➢ Marijuana was the most commonly used drug Others included cocaine (including crack), heroin, hallucinogens, inhalants, or prescription-type psychotherapeutics (pain relievers, tranquilizers, stimulants, and sedatives) used nonmedically – SAMHSA (2011) Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 10 Prevalence, Incidence, and Trends (Cont.)  Nonmedical use of prescription-type psychotherapeutics ➢ There is a significant increase in the lifetime nonmedical use of pain relievers—specifically Percocet®, Percodan®, Vicodin®, Lortab®, Darvocet®, Darvon®, Tylenol® with Codeine, Propoxyphene, or Codeine Products, Oxycodone, and Hydrocodone – NIDA (2010) Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 11 Prevalence, Incidence, and Trends (Cont.)  Hallucinogen, inhalant, and heroin use ➢ LSD (d-lysergic acid diethylamide) ➢ Peyote cactus ➢ Psilocybin ➢ PCP (phencyclidine) ➢ Inhalants of choice are amyl nitrite, “poppers,” followed by glue, shoe polish, or toluene; correction fluid, degreaser, or cleaning fluid; gasoline or lighter fluid; and spray paints and other aerosols. Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 12 Prevalence, Incidence, and Trends (Cont.)  Gender difference ➢ ➢  Geographic trends ➢  Males more likely to be current illicit drug users Female illicit drug use (12 and older) increasing Highest in West > Midwest > Northeast > South Racial/ethnic groups ➢ Highest among American Indians or Alaska natives > African Americans> whites > Hispanics > Asians – SAMHSA (2010) Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 13 Trends in Substance Abuse     May or may not relate to classically or clinically defined dependence or addiction. Many are turning to recovery before they have developed physiological dependence. Need to differentiate between use and misuse/abuse. Use of harmful substances is indirectly and directly related to all of the leading health indicators targeted in Healthy People 2020. Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 14 Methamphetamine (MA)     Most widely produced controlled substance in the United States. Illegal street names of the drug (crank, crystal, meth, ice, or glass). Can be injected, inhaled, taken orally, or smoked. Used predominantly by white young persons, with an overrepresentation of females. Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 15 Methamphetamine (MA) (Cont.)  Pleasurable effects are caused by the release of high levels of dopamine in the brain, leading to increased energy, a sense of euphoria, and increased productivity. ➢ ➢  Short-term effects: increased heart rate, insomnia, excessive talking, excitation, and aggressive behavior Prolonged use results in tolerance and physiological dependence Negative consequences range from anxiety, convulsions, and paranoia, to brain damage. Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 16 Methamphetamine (MA) (Cont.)  The impact of MA abuse on communities, families, and social networks is considerable. ➢ Young children of users are at risk for abuse and neglect. ➢ Prenatal use puts children at risk for developmental problems, aggression, and attention disorders. ➢ Exposure to combustible second-hand fumes. ➢ Associated with increased incidence of violence (e.g., domestic abuse, homicide, and suicide) Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 17 Steroids  Anabolic steroids are synthetic variants of male sex hormone testosterone ➢ ➢  Build muscle and said to be androgenic Most commonly used in athletes and other individuals willing to risk potential and irreversible health consequences to build muscle Potentially fatal risks ➢ ➢ Blood clots, liver damage, premature cardiovascular changes, increased cholesterol Increased potential for suicide and aggressive and risky behaviors Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 18 Inhalants  Contain volatile components with psychoactive properties ➢   Many products found in home or workplace (e.g., spray paints, markers, glues, and cleaning fluids) Produce a rapid high that may resemble alcohol intoxications; may progress to loss of sensation and even unconsciousness Irreversible effects: ➢ Hearing loss, limb spasms, CNS or brain damage, or bone marrow damage; may result in death from heart failure or suffocation Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 19 Adolescent Substance Abuse  Highest prevalence of illicit drug use during lifetime between 18 and 25 years ➢ Teen use of cigarettes and smokeless tobacco has declined ➢ Nearly half of teens try marijuana before they graduate—skepticism about drug’s danger  As harmful, illicit substances come in and out of vogue, CHN needs a good understanding of drug culture, terminology, and differing signs and symptoms Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 20 Conceptualizations of Substance Abuse    Conceptualizations have changed over the years, often for political and social reasons rather than for scientific reasons. “Dependence” or “abuse” What substances can be abused? ➢ APA focuses on alcohol, amphetamines, caffeine, cannabis, cocaine, hallucinogens, inhalants, nicotine, opioids, phencyclidine, sedatives, and hypnotics or anxiolytics Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 21 Defining Substance Abuse  Substance abuse: a maladaptive pattern of substance use that is manifested by recurrent and significant adverse consequences related to repeated use of a substance. ➢ ➢ ➢ ➢ Failure to fulfill major role obligations Repeated use in physically hazardous situations Multiple legal problems Recurrent social and interpersonal problems Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 22 Defining Substance Abuse (Cont.)  Dependence: a cluster of cognitive, behavioral, and physiological symptoms that indicate continued use of the substance despite significant substance-related problems ➢ ➢ ➢ ➢ Pattern of repeated, self-administered use Tolerance, withdrawal, and compulsive drug-taking behaviors A craving or strong desire for the substance Preoccupation with supply, money to purchase, and getting through time between periods of use Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 23 Sociocultural and Political Aspects of Substance Abuse    Determined largely by economic, cultural, and political conditions of potential users Cultural conditions create ambiguity in clearly determining when a problem exists. Competing value systems lead to cultural disintegration and a sense of powerlessness and hopelessness. Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 24 Course of Substance-Related Problems  Path from initiation to dependency is multidimensional. ➢     Person + substance + context/environment Progression varies—from initiation to continuation, transition to abuse, and finally, addiction and dependency Critical point is transition from use to abuse Addiction/dependency marked by changes in both behavior and cognition Once addiction is established, withdrawal symptoms are strong motivators to continue use Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 25 Legal and Ethical Concerns  U.S. policy based on prohibition and criminal sanctions against use and sale of illicit drugs ➢ ➢ ➢  Criminal activities (violence and drug trafficking) Drinking and driving, working while intoxicated Impact on fetus (FAS) Modes of intervention ➢ ➢ ➢ ➢ Limit access Media campaigns Educational programs National organizations that promote community education, research, and support Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 26 Prevention Strategies  Primary prevention ➢ ➢ ➢ ➢ ➢ ➢ ➢ ➢  Needs assessment to identify high-risk situations and potential problems Decriminalization and legalization of drugs(?) Community-based programs Training of health professionals Faith-based initiatives Volunteer consumer groups Organized sports programs Employer programs Often overshadowed by “War on Drugs” Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 27 Prevention Strategies (Cont.)  Secondary prevention ➢ ➢ ➢ ➢ Screening and finding resources • CAGE: an alcoholism screening test • Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment (CIWA) • Use evidence-based programs Efforts should be specific to aggregates, rather than directed at the “general public” Incorporate culturally sensitive and appropriate interventions and strategies Work toward improving individuals’ general competencies, communication skills, and selfesteem Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 28 Treatment  For individuals, consider: ➢ Cultural and educational background ➢ Resources of the person ➢ Attitudes of significant others ➢ Degree of invasiveness of the effects of the substance use The existence of alternatives ➢ Relapse prevention Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 29 Treatment (Cont.)  Inpatient and outpatient treatment programs ➢ May or may not include detoxification component ➢ Voluntary vs. compulsory ➢ Pharmacologically based vs. drug free ➢ Treatment approaches and models vary     Assessment process is of primary importance. Therapeutic relationship based on trust is essential. Physical examination is a valuable tool. Nonjudgmental attitude minimizes defensiveness. Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 30 Treatment (Cont.)  Programs usually include: ➢ Group and individual therapy and counseling ➢ Motivational interviewing ➢ Family counseling ➢ Education ➢ Socialization into 12-step mutual self-help groups ➢ Integrate psychotherapy with pharmacotherapy ➢ May include other strategies: • Hypnosis, occupational therapy, confrontation, assertiveness training, blood alcohol level discrimination training, behavior modification approaches Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 31 Treatment (Cont.)  Pharmacotherapies ➢  Mutual help groups ➢  Used in detoxification, stabilization, maintenance, as antagonists, and as treatment for coexisting disorders Operate through face-to-face supportive interaction focusing on a mutual goal; AA was first Harm reduction ➢ Elimination of the more harmful effects of substance use through behavior and policy modifications Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 32 Social Network Involvement Therapy that involves the family has proved to be most effective in aiding recovery.  Family and friends ➢ Highly influential or aid and abet ➢ Codependency and enabling  Effects on the family ➢ ➢  Functional or dysfunctional families Psychological and financial burdens Professional enablers ➢ ➢ Treatment of symptoms by medication Reluctant to bring up this taboo subject Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 33 Vulnerable Aggregates: Preadolescents and Adolescents      Times of experimentation, searching, confusion, rebellion, poor self-image, alienation, and insecurity Use of legal substances (e.g., tobacco, alcohol) almost always precedes use of illegal drugs. Poor school performance and drug use among peers are strongest predictors of subsequent drug involvement, followed by lack of strong family bond. The younger the initiation, the greater the probability of prolonged and accelerated use. Feeling of powerlessness; selling drugs seen as a viable economic solution to poverty. Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 34 Vulnerable Aggregates: Preadolescents and Adolescents (Cont.)  Primary prevention focuses on: ➢ ➢ ➢ ➢ ➢ ➢ ➢ Advocating for these vulnerable children Educating teachers on the vital importance of maintaining a validating, nonjudgmental attitude toward these students Supporting strong families in the community Improving knowledge through education and media Early detection of predisposing factors Providing structured clubs and organizations Facilitating school success, career skills, family communication skills, and conflict resolution Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 35 Vulnerable Aggregates: Elderly  Elderly experience ➢ Diminished physiological tolerance ➢ Increased use/misuse of medically prescribed drugs ➢ Cultural and social isolation  Misuse of prescription drugs may be the most common form of drug abuse among the elderly ➢ Use prescription medications approximately three times as frequently as general population Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 36 Vulnerable Aggregates: Women   Alcohol use and abuse affects women much differently than men. Women absorb and metabolize alcohol differently. ➢ ➢ Body composition differences and production of less gastric alcohol dehydrogenase Metabolize alcohol at a different rate Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 37 Vulnerable Aggregates: Women (Cont.)  Increased risk stems from economic, social, and cultural factors. ➢ Marginalization of certain groups ➢ History of child abuse ➢ Physical and medical problems related to reproductive systems ➢ Use during pregnancy has long-term developmental consequences for the newborn Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 38 Vulnerable Aggregates: Ethnocultural Considerations  African Americans, Hispanics, and Native Americans—increased risk for substance abuse. ➢ ➢ ➢ ➢ ➢ ➢  Economically disenfranchised groups Discrimination and racism Socioeconomic, political, and historical realities Myths and stereotypes Social support—positive effect on treatment/outcome Environmental cues and conditioned reinforcement Treatment poses special challenges. Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 39 Vulnerable Aggregates: Other Aggregates  Substance abuse is most common psychopathological problem in the general population. ➢ ➢ ➢ ➢ Dual-diagnosis individuals • Psychiatric disorder + substance abuse disorder Risk for multiple vulnerabilities in one individual Impact of substance abuse on STDs Substance abuse among health care professionals Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 40 Nursing Interventions in the Community       Understand own experiences and prejudices. Routinely assess substance use patterns when performing client histories. Be alert to environmental cues in the home that indicate substance abuse. Increase the individual’s and family’s awareness of the problem. Involve the social network in getting the client into treatment. Develop a caring nursing relationship. Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 41 Other Traditional Nursing Roles and Interventions      Health teaching regarding addictive illness and addictive effects of different substances Advocating that EBP treatment works in special populations through problem-solving courts (drug courts), specialized adolescent treatment, and other community case management programs. Providing direct care for abuse- and dependencerelated medical problems Educating clients and families about problems related to substance abuse Collaborating with other disciplines to ensure continuity of care Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 42 Other Traditional Nursing Roles and Interventions (Cont.)     Coordinating health care services for the client to prevent prescription drug abuse and avoid fragmentation of care Providing consultation to nonmedical professionals and lay personnel Facilitating care through appropriate referrals and follow-up Knowing how to use community resources for working with substance abuse, mental health, and other issues Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. 43
Purchase answer to see full attachment

Week 6 Nursing Role Development And Future Scope In Healhcare

Week 6 Nursing Role Development And Future Scope In Healhcare

2 The Pedagogy Role Development in Professional Nursing Practice, Fourth Edition drives comprehension through

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

various strategies that meet the learning needs of students, while also generating enthusiasm about the topic. This interactive approach addresses different learning styles, making this the ideal text to ensure mastery of key concepts. The pedagogical aids that appear in most chapters include the following: 3 4 5 6 World Headquarters Jones & Bartlett Learning 5 Wall Street Burlington, MA 01803 978-443-5000 info@jblearning.com www.jblearning.com Jones & Bartlett Learning books and products are available through most bookstores and online booksellers. To contact Jones & Bartlett Learning directly, call 800-832-0034, fax 978-443-8000, or visit our website, www.jblearning.com. Substantial discounts on bulk quantities of Jones & Bartlett Learning publications are available to corporations, professional associations, and other qualified organizations. For details and specific discount information, contact the special sales department at Jones & Bartlett Learning via the above contact information or send an email to specialsales@jblearning.com. Copyright © 2017 by Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC, an Ascend Learning Company All rights reserved. No part of the material protected by this copyright may be reproduced or utilized in any form, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without written permission from the copyright owner. The content, statements, views, and opinions herein are the sole expression of the respective authors and not that of Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not constitute or imply its endorsement or recommendation by Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC and such reference shall not be used for advertising or product endorsement purposes. All trademarks displayed are the trademarks of the parties noted herein. Role Development in Professional Nursing Practice, Fourth Edition is an independent publication and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by the owners of the trademarks or service marks referenced in this product. There may be images in this book that feature models; these models do not necessarily endorse, represent, or participate in the activities represented in the images. Any screenshots in this product are for educational and instructive purposes only. Any individuals and scenarios featured in the case studies throughout this product may be real or fictitious, but are used for instructional purposes only. The authors, editor, and publisher have made every effort to provide accurate information. However, they are not responsible for errors, omissions, or for any outcomes related to the use of the contents of this book and take no responsibility for the use of the products and procedures described. Treatments and side effects described in this book may not be applicable to all people; likewise, some people may require a dose or experience a side effect that is not described herein. Drugs and medical devices are discussed that may have limited availability controlled by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use only in a research study or clinical trial. Research, clinical practice, and government regulations often change the accepted standard in this field. When consideration is being given to use of any drug in the clinical setting, the health care provider or reader is responsible for determining FDA status of the drug, reading the package insert, and reviewing prescribing information for the most up-to-date recommendations on dose, precautions, and contraindications, and determining the appropriate usage for the product. This is especially important in the case of drugs that are new or seldom used. 08323-1 7 Production Credits VP, Executive Publisher: David D. Cella Executive Editor: Amanda Martin Acquisitions Editor: Teresa Reilly Editorial Assistant: Danielle Bessette Production Editor: Vanessa Richards Senior Marketing Manager: Jennifer Scherzay VP, Manufacturing and Inventory Control: Therese Connell Composition: Integra Software Services Pvt. Ltd. Cover Design: Kristin E. Parker Rights & Media Specialist: Wes DeShano Media Development Editor: Shannon Sheehan Cover Image: © robertiez/iStock/Getty Images Plus/Getty Printing and Binding: RR Donnelley Cover Printing: RR Donnelley Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Role development in professional nursing practice / [edited by] Kathleen Masters. – Fourth edition. p. ; cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-284-07832-9 (pbk.) I. Masters, Kathleen, editor. [DNLM: 1. Nursing–standards. 2. Nursing–trends. 3. Nurse’s Role. 4. Philosophy, Nursing. 5. Professional Practice. WY 16] RT82 610.73–dc23 2015022040 6048 Printed in the United States of America 19 18 17 16 15 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 8 Dedication This book is dedicated to my Heavenly Father and to my loving family: my husband, Eddie, and my two daughters, Rebecca and Rachel. Words cannot express my appreciation for their ongoing encouragement and support throughout my career. 9 CONTENTS Preface Contributors UNIT I: FOUNDATIONS OF PROFESSIONAL NURSING PRACTICE 1 A History of Health Care and Nursing Karen Saucier Lundy and Kathleen Masters Classical Era Middle Ages The Renaissance The Dark Period of Nursing The Industrial Revolution And Then There Was Nightingale… Continued Development of Professional Nursing in the United Kingdom The Development of Professional Nursing in Canada The Development of Professional Nursing in Australia Early Nursing Education and Organization in the United States The Evolution of Nursing in the United States: The First Century of Professional Nursing The New Century International Council of Nurses Conclusion References 2 Frameworks for Professional Nursing Practice Kathleen Masters 10 Overview of Selected Nursing Theories Nurse of the Future: Nursing Core Competencies Overview of Selected Non-Nursing Theories Relationship of Theory to Professional Nursing Practice Conclusion References 3 Philosophy of Nursing Mary W. Stewart Philosophy Early Philosophy Paradigms Beliefs Values Developing a Personal Philosophy of Nursing Conclusion References 4 Foundations of Ethical Nursing Practice Janie B. Butts and Karen L. Rich Ethics Ethical Theories and Approaches Professional Ethics and Codes Ethical Analysis and Decision Making in Nursing Conclusion References 5 Social Context of Professional Nursing Mary W. Stewart, Katherine Elizabeth Nugent, Rowena W. Elliott, and 11 Kathleen Masters Nursing’s Social Contract with Society Public Image of Nursing The Gender Gap Changing Demographics and Cultural Competence Access to Health Care Societal Trends Trends in Nursing Conclusion References 6 Education and Socialization to the Professional Nursing Role Kathleen Masters and Melanie Gilmore Professional Nursing Roles and Values The Socialization (or Formation) Process Facilitating the Transition to Professional Practice Conclusion References 7 Advancing and Managing Your Professional Nursing Career Mary Louise Coyne and Cynthia Chatham Nursing: A Job or a Career? Trends That Impact Nursing Career Decisions Showcasing Your Professional Self Mentoring Education and Lifelong Learning Professional Engagement Expectations for Your Performance 12 Taking Care of Self Conclusion References UNIT II: PROFESSIONAL NURSING PRACTICE AND THE MANAGEMENT OF PATIENT CARE 8 Patient Safety and Professional Nursing Practice Jill Rushing and Kathleen Masters Patient Safety Critical Thinking, Clinical Judgment, and Clinical Reasoning in Nursing Practice Conclusion References 9 Quality Improvement and Professional Nursing Practice Kathleen Masters Healthcare Quality Measurement of Quality The Role of the Nurse in Quality Improvement Conclusion References Professional Nursing Practice 10 Evidence-Based Kathleen Masters Evidence-Based Practice: What Is It? Barriers to Evidence-Based Practice Promoting Evidence-Based Practice Searching for Evidence Evaluating the Evidence Implementation Models for Evidence-Based Practice 13 Conclusion References 11 Patient-Centered Care and Professional Nursing Practice Kathleen Masters Dimensions of Patient-Centered Care Communication as a Strategy to Support Patient-Centered Care Patient Education as a Strategy to Support Patient-Centered Care Evaluation of Patient-Centered Care Conclusion References in Professional Nursing Practice 12 Informatics Kathleen Masters and Cathy K. Hughes Informatics: What Is It? The Impact of Legislation on Health Informatics Nursing Informatics Competencies Basic Computer Competencies Information Literacy Information Management Current and Future Trends Conclusion References and Collaboration in Professional Nursing Practice 13 Teamwork Sharon Vincent and Kathleen Masters Healthcare Delivery System Nursing Models of Patient Care Roles of the Professional Nurse 14 Interprofessional Teams and Healthcare Quality and Safety Interprofessional Collaborative Practice Domains Interprofessional Team Performance and Communication Conclusion References Issues in Professional Nursing Practice 14 Ethical Janie B. Butts and Karen L. Rich Relationships in Professional Practice Moral Rights and Autonomy Social Justice Death and End-of-Life Care Conclusion References and the Professional Nurse 15 Law Kathleen Driscoll, Kathleen Masters, and Evadna Lyons The Sources of Law Classification and Enforcement of the Law Nursing Scope and Standards Malpractice and Negligence Nursing Licensure Professional Accountability Conclusion References Appendix A Standards of Professional Nursing Practice Appendix B Provisions of Code of Ethics for Nurses Appendix C The ICN Code of Ethics for Nurses 15 Glossary Index 16 PREFACE Although the process of professional development is a lifelong journey, it is a journey that begins in earnest during the time of initial academic preparation. The goal of this book is to provide nursing students with a road map to help guide them along their journey as a professional nurse. This book is organized into two units. The chapters in the first unit focus on the foundational concepts that are essential to the development of the individual professional nurse. The chapters in Unit II address issues related to professional nursing practice and the management of patient care, specifically in the context of quality and safety. In the fourth edition, the chapter content is conceptualized, when applicable, around nursing competencies, professional standards, and recommendations from national groups, such as Institute of Medicine reports. The chapters included in Unit I provide the student nurse with a basic foundation in areas such as nursing history, theory, philosophy, ethics, socialization into the nursing role, and the social context of nursing. All chapters have been updated, and several chapters in Unit I have been expanded in this edition. Revisions to the chapter on nursing history include the addition of contributions of prominent nurses and achievements related to nursing in the United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia. The theory chapter now includes additional nursing theorists as well as a brief overview of several non-nursing theories frequently used in nursing research and practice. The social context of nursing chapter now incorporates not only societal trends, but also trends in nursing practice and education. The chapter related to professional career development in nursing has been completely rewritten for this edition. The chapters in Unit II are more directly related to patient care management. In the fourth edition, Unit II chapter topics are presented in the context of quality and safety. Chapter topics include the role of the nurse in patient safety, the role of the nurse in quality improvement, evidence-based nursing practice, the role of the nurse in patient-centered care, informatics in nursing practice, the role of the nurse related to teamwork and collaboration, ethical issues in nursing practice, and the law as it relates to patient care and nursing. Most Unit II chapters have undergone major revisions with a refocus of the content on recommended nursing and healthcare competencies. The fourth edition continues to incorporate the Nurse of the Future: Nursing Core Competencies throughout each chapter. The Nurse of the Future: Nursing Core Competencies “emanate from the foundation of nursing knowledge” (Massachusetts Department of Higher Education, 2010, 17 p. 4) and are based on the American Association of Colleges of Nursing’s Essentials of Baccalaureate Education for Professional Nursing Practice, National League for Nursing Council of Associate Degree Nursing competencies, Institute of Medicine recommendations, Quality and Safety Education for Nurses (QSEN) competencies, and American Nurses Association standards, as well as other professional organization standards and recommendations. The 10 competencies included in the model are patient-centered care, professionalism, informatics and technology, evidencebased practice, leadership, systems-based practice, safety, communication, teamwork and collaboration, and quality improvement. Essential knowledge, skills, and attitudes (KSA) reflecting cognitive, psychomotor, and affective learning domains are specified for each competency. The KSA identified in the model reflect the expectations for initial nursing practice following the completion of a prelicensure professional nursing education program (Massachusetts Department of Higher Education, 2010, p. 4). 18 Source: Modified from Massachusetts Department of Higher Education. (2010). Nurse of the future: Nursing core competencies (p. 5). Retrieved from http://www.mass.edu/currentinit/documents/NursingCoreCompetencies.pdf The Nurse of the Future: Nursing Core Competencies graphic illustrates through the use of broken lines the reciprocal and continuous relationship between each of the competencies and nursing knowledge, that the competencies can overlap and are not mutually exclusive, and that all competencies are of equal importance. In addition, nursing knowledge is placed as the core in the graphic to illustrate that nursing knowledge reflects the overarching art and science of professional nursing practice (Massachusetts Department of Higher Education, 2010, p. 4). This new edition has competency boxes throughout the chapters that link examples of the KSA appropriate to the chapter content to Nurse of the Future: Nursing Core Competencies required of entry-level professional 19 nurses. The competency model in its entirety is available online at www.mass.edu/currentinit/documents/NursingCoreCompetencies.pdf. This new edition continues to use case studies, congruent with Benner, Sutphen, Leonard, and Day’s (2010) Carnegie Report recommendations that nursing educators teach for “situated cognition” using narrative strategies to lead to “situated action,” thus increasing the clinical connection in our teaching or that we teach for “clinical salience.” In addition, critical thinking questions are included throughout each chapter to promote student reflection on the chapter concepts. Classroom activities are also provided based on chapter content. Additional resources not connected to this text, but applicable to the content herein, include a toolkit focused on the nursing core competencies available at www.mass.edu/nahi/documents/ToolkitFirst%20Edition-May%202014-r1.pdf and teaching activities related to nursing competencies available on the QSEN website at www.qsen.org/teaching-strategies/. Although the topics included in this textbook are not inclusive of all that could be discussed in relationship to the broad theme of role development in professional nursing practice, it is my prayer that the subjects herein make a contribution to the profession of nursing by providing the student with a solid foundation and a desire to grow as a professional nurse throughout the journey that we call a professional nursing career. Let the journey begin. —Kathleen Masters References Benner, P., Sutphen, M., Leonard, V., & Day, L. (2010). Educating nurses: A call for radical transformation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Massachusetts Department of Higher Education. (2010). Nurse of the future: Nursing core competencies. Retrieved from http://www.mass.edu/currentinit/documents/NursingCoreCompetencies.pdf 20 CONTRIBUTORS Janie B. Butts, PhD, RN University of Southern Mississippi College of Nursing Hattiesburg, Mississippi Cynthia Chatham, DSN, RN University of Southern Mississippi College of Nursing Long Beach, Mississippi Mary Louise Coyne, DNSc, RN University of Southern Mississippi College of Nursing Long Beach, Mississippi Kathleen Driscoll, JD, MS, RN University of Cincinnati College of Nursing Cincinnati, Ohio Rowena W. Elliott, PhD, RN, FAAN University of Southern Mississippi College of Nursing Hattiesburg, Mississippi Melanie Gilmore, PhD, RN University of Southern Mississippi College of Nursing Hattiesburg, Mississippi Cathy K. Hughes, DNP, RN University of Southern Mississippi College of Nursing Hattiesburg, Mississippi Karen Saucier Lundy, PhD, RN, FAAN Professor Emeritus University of Southern Mississippi College of Nursing Hattiesburg, Mississippi Evadna Lyons, PhD, RN East Central Community College School of Nursing Decatur, Mississippi Katherine Elizabeth Nugent, PhD, RN Dean, College of Nursing University of Southern Mississippi Hattiesburg, Mississippi Karen L. Rich, PhD, RN University of Southern Mississippi College of Nursing Long Beach, Mississippi 21 Jill Rushing, MSN, RN University of Southern Mississippi College of Nursing Hattiesburg, Mississippi Mary W. Stewart, PhD, RN Director of PhD Program University of Mississippi Medical Center School of Nursing Jackson, Mississippi Sharon Vincent, DNP, RN, CNOR University of North Carolina College of Nursing Charlotte, North Carolina 22 UNIT I Foundations of Professional Nursing Practice 23 CHAPTER 1 A History of Health Care and Nursing Karen Saucier Lundy and Kathleen Masters 24 Learning Objectives After completing this chapter, the student should be able to: 1. Identify social, political, and economic influences on the development of professional nursing practice. 2. Identify important leaders and events that have significantly affected the development of professional nursing practice. 25 Key Terms and Concepts » Greek era » Roman era » Deaconesses » Florence Nightingale » Reformation » Chadwick Report » Shattuck Report » William Rathbone » Ethel Fenwick » Jeanne Mance » Mary Agnes Snively » Goldmark Report » Brown Report » Isabel Hampton Robb » American Nurses Association (ANA) » Lavinia Lloyd Dock » American Journal of Nursing (AJN) » Margaret Sanger » Lillian Wald » Jane A. Delano » Annie Goodrich » Mary Brewster » Henry Street Settlement » Elizabeth Tyler » Jessie Sleet Scales » Dorothea Lynde Dix » Clara Barton 26 » Frontier Nursing Service » Mary Breckinridge » Mary D. Osborne » Frances Payne Bolton » International Council of Nurses (ICN) Although no specialized nurse role per se developed in early civilizations, human cultures recognized the need for nursing care. The truly sick person was weak and helpless and could not fulfill the duties that were normally expected of a member of the community. In such cases, someone had to watch over the patient, nurse him or her, and provide care. In most societies, this nurse role was filled by a family member, usually female. As in most cultures, the childbearing woman had special needs that often resulted in a specialized role for the caregiver. Every society since the dawn of time had someone to nurse and take care of the mother and infant around the childbearing events. In whatever form the nurse took, the role was associated with compassion, health promotion, and kindness (Bullough & Bullough, 1978). 27 Classical Era More than 4,000 years ago, Egyptian physicians and nurses used an abundant pharmacological repertoire to cure the ill and injured. The Ebers Papyrus lists more than 700 remedies for ailments ranging from snakebites to puerperal fever (Kalisch & Kalisch, 1986). Healing appeared in the Egyptian culture as the successful result of a contest between invisible beings of good and evil (Shryock, 1959). Around 1000 B.C., the Egyptians constructed elaborate drainage systems, developed pharmaceutical herbs and preparations, and embalmed the dead. The Hebrews formulated an elaborate hygiene code that dealt with laws governing both personal and community hygiene, such as contagion, disinfection, and sanitation through the preparation of food and water. The Jewish contribution to health is greater in sanitation than in their concept of disease. Garbage and excreta were disposed of outside the city or camp, infectious diseases were quarantined, spitting was outlawed as unhygienic, and bodily cleanliness became a prerequisite for moral purity. Although many of the Hebrew ideas about hygiene were Egyptian in origin, the Hebrews were the first to codify them and link them with spiritual godliness (Bullough & Bullough, 1978). Disease and disability in the Mesopotamian area were considered a great curse, a divine punishment for grievous acts against the gods. Experiencing illness as punishment for a sin linked the sick person to anything even remotely deviant. Not only was the person suffering from the illness, but he or she also was branded by all of society as having deserved it. Those who obeyed God’s law lived in health and happiness, and those who transgressed the law were punished with illness and suffering. The sick person then had to make atonement for the sins, enlist a priest or other spiritual healer to lift the curse, or live with the illness to its ultimate outcome (Bullough & Bullough, 1978). Nursing care by a family member or relative would be needed, regardless of the outcome of the sin, curse, disease-atonement-recovery, or death cycle. This logic became the basis for explanation of why some people “get sick and some don’t” for many centuries and still persists to some degree in most cultures today. The Greeks and Health In Greek mythology, the god of medicine, Asclepias, cured disease. One of his daughters, Hygeia, from whom we derive the word hygiene, was the goddess of preventive health and protected humans from disease. Panacea, Asclepias’ other daughter, was known as the all-healing “universal remedy,” and today her name is used to describe any ultimate cure-all in medicine. She 28 was known as the “light” of the day, and her name was invoked and shrines built to her during times of epidemics (Brooke, 1997). During the Greek era, Hippocrates of Cos emphasized the rational treatment of sickness as a natural rather than god-inflicted phenomenon. Hippocrates (460–370 B.C.) is considered the father of medicine because of his arrangements of the oral and written remedies and diseases, which had long been secrets held by priests and religious healers, into a textbook of medicine that was used for centuries (Bullough & Bullough, 1978). In Greek society, health was considered to result from a balance between mind and body. Hippocrates wrote a most important book, Air, Water and Places, which detailed the relationship between humans and the environment. This is considered a milestone in the eventual development of the science of epidemiology as the first such treatise on the connectedness of the web of life. This topic of the relationship between humans and their environment did not reoccur until the development of bacteriology in the late 1800s (Rosen, 1958). Perhaps the idea that most damaged the practice and scientific theory of medicine and health for centuries was the doctrine of the four humors, first spoken of by Empedocles of Acragas (493–433 B.C.). Empedocles was a philosopher and a physician, and as a result, he synthesized his cosmological ideas with his medical theory. He believed that the same four elements that made up the universe were found in humans and in all animate beings (Bullough & Bullough, 1978). Empedocles believed that man was a microcosm, a small world within the macrocosm, or external environment. The four humors of the body (blood, bile, phlegm, and black bile) corresponded to the four elements of the larger world (fire, air, water, and earth) (Kalisch & Kalisch, 1986). Depending on the prevailing humor, a person was sanguine, choleric, phlegmatic, or melancholic. Because of this strongly held and persistent belief in the connection between the balance of the four humors and health status, treatment was aimed at restoring the appropriate balance of the four humors through the control of their corresponding elements. Through manipulating the two sets of opposite qualities—hot and cold, wet and dry—balance was the goal of the intervention. Fire was hot and dry, air was hot and wet, water was cold and wet, and earth was cold and dry. For example, if a person had a fever, cold compresses would be prescribed; for a chill the person would be warmed. Such doctrine gave rise to faulty and ineffective treatment of disease that influenced medical education for many years (Taylor, 1922). Plato, in The Republic, details the importance of recreation, a balanced mind and body, nutrition, and exercise. A distinction was made among gender, class, and health as early as the Greek era; only males of the aristocracy could afford the luxury of maintaining a healthful lifestyle 29 (Rosen, 1958). In The Iliad, a poem about the attempts to capture Troy and rescue Helen from her lover Paris, 140 different wounds are described. The mortality rate averaged 77.6%, the highest as a result of sword and spear thrusts and the lowest from superficial arrow wounds. There was considerable need for nursing care, and Achilles, Patroclus, and other princes often acted as nurses to the injured. The early stages of Greek medicine reflected the influences of Egyptian, Babylonian, and Hebrew medicine. Therefore, good medical and nursing techniques were used to treat these war wounds: The arrow was drawn or cut out, the wound washed, soothing herbs applied, and the wound bandaged. However, in sickness in which no wound occurred, an evil spirit was considered the cause. The Greeks applied rational causes and cures to external injuries, while internal ailments continued to be linked to spiritual maladies (Bullough & Bullough, 1978). Roman Era During the rise and the fall of the Roman era (31 B.C.–A.D. 476), Greek culture continued to be a strong influence. The Romans easily adopted Greek culture and expanded the Greeks’ accomplishments, especially in the fields of engineering, law, and government. For Romans, the government had an obligation to protect its citizens, not only from outside aggression such as warring neighbors, but from inside the civilization, in the form of health laws. According to Bullough and Bullough (1978), Rome was essentially a “Greek cultural colony” (p. 20). Galen of Pergamum (A.D. 129–199), often known as the greatest Greek physician after Hippocrates, left for Rome after studying medicine in Greece and Egypt and gained great fame as a medical practitioner, lecturer, and experimenter. In his lifetime, medicine evolved into a science; he submitted traditional healing practices to experimentation and was possibly the greatest medical researcher before the 1600s (Bullough & Bullough, 1978). He was considered the last of the great physicians of antiquity (Kalisch & Kalisch, 1986). The Greek physicians and healers certainly made the most contributions to medicine, but the Romans surpassed the Greeks in promoting the evolution of nursing. Roman armies developed the notion of a mobile war nursing unit because their battles took them far from home where they could be cared for by wives and family. This portable hospital was a series of tents arranged in corridors; as battles wore on, these tents gave way to buildings that became permanent convalescent camps at the battle sites (Rosen, 1958). Many of these early military hospitals have been excavated by archaeologists along the banks of the Rhine and Danube Rivers. They had wards, recreation areas, baths, pharmacies, and even rooms for officers who needed a “rest 30 cure” (Bullough & Bullough, 1978). Coexisting were the Greek dispensary forms of temples, or the iatreia, which started out as a type of physician waiting room. These eventually developed into a primitive type of hospital, places for surgical clients to stay until they could be taken home by their families. Although nurses during the Roman era were usually family members, servants, or slaves, nursing had strengthened its position in medical care and emerged during the Roman era as a separate and distinct specialty. The Romans developed massive aqueducts, bathhouses, and sewer systems during this era. At the height of the Roman Empire, Rome provided 40 gallons of water per person per day to its 1 million inhabitants, which is comparable to our rates of consumption today (Rosen, 1958). 31 Middle Ages Many of the advancements of the Greco-Roman era were reversed during the Middle Ages (A.D. 476–1453) after the decline of the Roman Empire. The Middle Ages, or the medieval era, served as a transition between ancient and modern civilizations. Once again, myth, magic, and religion were explanations and cures for illness and health problems. The medieval world was the result of a fusion of three streams of thought, actions, and ways of life—Greco-Roman, Germanic, and Christian—into one (Donahue, 1985). Nursing was most influenced by Christianity with the beginning of deaconesses, or female servants, doing the work of God by ministering to the needs of others. Deacons in the early Christian churches were apparently available only to care for men, while deaconesses cared for the needs of women. The role of deaconesses in the church was considered a forward step in the development of nursing and in the 1800s would strongly influence the young Florence Nightingale. During this era, Roman military hospitals were replaced by civilian ones. In early Christianity, the Diakonia, a kind of combination outpatient and welfare office, was managed by deacons and deaconesses and served as the equivalent of a hospital. Jesus served as the example of charity and compassion for the poor and marginal of society. Communicable diseases were rampant during the Middle Ages, primarily because of the walled cities that emerged in response to the paranoia and isolation of the populations. Infection was next to impossible to control. Physicians had little to offer, deferring to the church for management of disease. Nursing roles were carried out primarily by religious orders. The oldest hospital (other than military hospitals in the Roman era) in Europe was most likely the Hôtel-Dieu in Lyons, France, founded about 542 by Childebert I, king of France. The Hôtel-Dieu in Paris was founded around 652 by Saint Landry, bishop of Paris. During the Middle Ages, charitable institutions, hospitals, and medical schools increased in number, with the religious leaders as caregivers. The word hospital, which is derived from the Latin word hospitalis, meaning service of guests, was most likely more of a shelter for travelers and other pilgrims as well as the occasional person who needed extra care (Kalisch & Kalisch, 1986). Early European hospitals were more like hospices or homes for the aged, sick pilgrims, or orphans. Nurses in these early hospitals were religious deaconesses who chose to care for others in a life of servitude and spiritual sacrifice. Black Death During the Middle Ages, a series of horrible epidemics, including the Black 32 Death or bubonic plague, ravaged the civilized world (Diamond, 1997). In the 1300s, Europe, Asia, and Africa saw nearly half their populations lost to the bubonic plague. Worldwide, more than 60 million deaths were attributed to this horrible plague. In some parts of Europe, only one-fourth of the population survived, with some places having too few survivors alive to bury the dead. Families abandoned sick children and the sick were often left to die alone (Cartwright, 1972). Nurses and physicians were powerless to avert the disease. Black spots and tumors on the skin appeared, and petechiae and hemorrhages gave the skin a darkened appearance. There was also acute inflammation of the lungs, burning sensations, unquenchable thirst, and inflammation of the entire body. Hardly anyone afflicted survived the third day of the attack. So great was the fear of contagion that ships carrying bodies of infected persons were set to sail without a crew to drift from port to port through the North, Black, and Mediterranean Seas with their dead passengers (Cohen, 1989). Medieval people knew that this disease was in some way communicable, but they were unsure of the mode of transmission (Diamond, 1997); hence the avoidance of victims and a reliance on isolation techniques. During this time, the practice of quarantine in city ports was developed as a preventive measure that is still used today (Bullough & Bullough, 1978; Kalisch & Kalisch, 1986). 33 The Renaissance During the rebirth of Europe, political, social, and economic advances occurred along with a tremendous revival of learning. Donahue (1985) contends that the Renaissance has been “viewed as both a blessing and a curse” (p. 188). There was a renewed interest in the arts and sciences, which helped advance medical science (Boorstin, 1985; Bullough & Bullough, 1978). Columbus and other explorers discovered new worlds, and belief in a sun-centered rather than an Earth-centered universe was promoted by Copernicus (1473–1543). Sir Isaac Newton’s (1642–1727) theory of gravity changed the world forever. Gunpowder was introduced, and social and religious upheavals resulted in the American and French Revolutions at the end of the 1700s. In the arts and sciences, Leonardo da Vinci, known as one of “the greatest geniuses of all time,” made a number of anatomic drawings based on dissection experiences. These drawings have become classics in the progression of knowledge about the human anatomy. Many artists of this time left an indelible mark and continue to exert influence today, including Michelangelo, Raphael, and Titian (Donahue, 1985). The Reformation Religious changes during the Renaissance influenced nursing perhaps more than any other aspect of society. Particularly important was the rise of Protestantism as a result of the reform movements of Martin Luther (1483– 1546) in Germany and John Calvin (1509–1564) in France and Switzerland. Although the various sects were numerous in the Protestant movement, the agreement among the leaders was almost unanimous on the abolition of the monastic or cloistered career. The effects on nursing were drastic: Monasticaffiliated institutions, including hospitals and schools, were closed, and orders of nuns, including nurses, were dissolved. Even in countries where Catholicism flourished, royal leaders seized monasteries frequently. Religious leaders, such as Martin Luther, who led the Reformation in 1517, were well aware of the lack of adequate nursing care as a result of these sweeping changes. Luther advocated that each town establish something akin to a “community chest” to raise funds for hospitals and nurse visitors for the poor (Dietz & Lehozky, 1963). Thus, the closures of the monasteries eventually resulted in the creation of public hospitals where laywomen performed nursing care. It was difficult to find laywomen who were willing to work in these hospitals to care for the sick, so judges began giving prostitutes, publically intoxicated women, and poverty-stricken women the option of going to jail, going to the poorhouse, or working in the 34 public hospital. Unlike the sick wards in monasteries, which were generally considered to be clean and well managed, the public hospitals were filthy, disorganized buildings where people went to die while being cared for by laywomen who were not trained, motivated, or qualified to care for the sick (Sitzman & Judd, 2014a). In England, where there had been at least 450 charitable foundations before the Reformation, only a few survived the reign of Henry VIII, who closed most of the monastic hospitals (Donahue, 1985). Eventually, Henry VIII’s son, Edward VI, who reigned from 1547 to 1553, endowed some hospitals, namely, St. Bartholomew’s Hospital and St. Thomas’ Hospital, which would eventually house the Nightingale School of Nursing later in the 1800s (Bullough & Bullough, 1978). 35 The Dark Period of Nursing The last half of the period between 1500 and 1860 is widely regarded as the “dark period of nursing” because nursing conditions were at their worst (Donahue, 1985). Education for girls, which had been provided by the nuns in religious schools, was lost. Because of the elimination of hospitals and schools, there was no one to pass on knowledge about caring for the sick. As a result, the hospitals were managed and staffed by municipal authorities; women entering nursing service often came from illiterate classes, and even then, there were too few to serve (Dietz & Lehozky, 1963). The lay attendants who filled the nursing role were illiterate, rough, inconsiderate, and often immoral and alcoholic. Intelligent women and men could not be persuaded to accept such a degraded and low-status position in the offensive municipal hospitals of London. Nursing slipped back into a role of servitude as menial, low-status work. According to Donahue (1985), when a woman could no longer make it as a gambler, prostitute, or thief, she might become a nurse. Eventually, women serving jail sentences for crimes such as prostitution and stealing were ordered to care for the sick in the hospitals instead of serving their sentences in the city jail (Dietz & Lehozky, 1963). The nurses of this era took bribes from clients, became inappropriately involved with them, and survived the best way they could, often at the expense of their assigned clients. Nursing had, during this era, virtually no social standing or organization. Even Catholic sisters of the religious orders throughout Europe “came to a complete standstill” professionally because of the intolerance of society (Donahue, 1985, p. 231). Charles Dickens, in Martin Chuzzlewit (1844), created the enduring characters of Sairey Gamp and Betsy Prig. Sairey Gamp was a visiting nurse based on an actual hired attendant whom Dickens had met in a friend’s home. Sairey Gamp was hired to care for sick family members but was instead cruel to her clients, stole from them, and ate their rations; she was an alcoholic and has been immortalized forever as a reminder of the world in which Florence Nightingale came of age (Donahue, 1985). In the New World, the first hospital in the Americas, the Hospital de la Purísima Concepción, was founded some time before 1524 by Hernando Cortez, the conqueror of Mexico. The first hospital in the continental United States was erected in Manhattan in 1658 for the care of sick soldiers and slaves. In 1717, a hospital for infectious diseases was built in Boston; the first hospital established by a private gift was the Charity Hospital in New Orleans. A sailor, Jean Louis, donated the endowment for the hospital’s founding (Bullough & Bullough, 1978). 36 During the 1600s and 1700s, colonial hospitals with little resemblance to modern hospitals were often used to house the poor and downtrodden. Hospitals called “pesthouses” were created to care for clients with contagious diseases; their primary purpose was to protect the public at large, rather than to treat and care for the clients. Contagious diseases were rampant during the early years of the American colonies, often being spread by the large number of immigrants who brought these diseases with them on their long journey to America. Medicine was not as developed as in Europe, and nursing remained in the hands of the uneducated. By 1720, average life expectancy at birth was only around 35 years. Plagues were a constant nightmare, with outbreaks of smallpox and yellow fever. In 1751, the first true hospital in the new colonies, Pennsylvania Hospital, was erected in Philadelphia on the recommendation of Benjamin Franklin (Kalisch & Kalisch, 1986). By today’s standards, hospitals in the 1800s were disgraceful, dirty, unventilated, and contaminated by infections; to be a client in a hospital actually increased one’s risk of dying. As in England, nursing was considered an inferior occupation. After the sweeping changes of the Reformation, educated religious health workers were replaced with lay people who were “down and outers,” in prison, or had no option left but to work with the sick (Kalisch & Kalisch, 1986). 37 The Industrial Revolution During the mid-1700s in England, capitalism emerged as an economic system based on profit. This emerging system resulted in mass production, as contrasted with the previous system of individual workers and craftsmen. In the simplest terms, the Industrial Revolution was the application of machine power to processes formerly done by hand. Machinery was invented during this era and ultimately standardized quality; individual craftsmen were forced to give up their crafts and lands and become factory laborers for the capitalist owners. All types of industries were affected; this new-found efficiency produced profit for owners of the means of production. Because of this, the era of invention flourished, factories grew, and people moved in record numbers to the work in the cities. Urban areas grew, tenement housing projects emerged, and overcrowding in cities seriously threatened individuals’ well-being (Donahue, 1985). Workers were forced to go to the machines, rather than the other way around. Such relocations meant giving up not only farming, but a way of life that had existed for centuries. The emphasis on profit over people led to child labor, frequent layoffs, and long workdays filled with stressful, tedious, unfamiliar work. Labor unions did not exist, and neither was there any legal protection against exploitation of workers, including children (Donahue, 1985). All these rapid changes and often threatening conditions created the world of Charles Dickens, where, as in his book Oliver Twist, children worked as adults without question. According to Donahue (1985), urban life, trade, and industrialization contributed to these overwhelming health hazards, and the situation was confounded by the lack of an adequate means of social control. Reforms were desperately needed, and the social reform movement emerged in response to the unhealthy by-products of the Industrial Revolution. It was in this world of the 1800s that reformers such as John Stuart Mill (1806–1873) emerged. Although the Industrial Revolution began in England, it quickly spread to the rest of Europe and to the United States (Bullough & Bullough, 1978). The reform movement is critical to understanding the emerging health concerns that were later addressed by Florence Nightingale. Mill championed popular education, the emancipation of women, trade unions, and religious toleration. Other reform issues of the era included the abolition of slavery and, most important for nursing, more humane care of the sick, the poor, and the wounded (Bullough & Bullough, 1978). There was a renewed energy in the religious community with the reemergence of new religious orders in the Catholic Church that provided service to the sick and disenfranchised. 38 Epidemics had ravaged Europe for centuries, but they became even more serious with urbanization. Industrialization brought people to cities, where they worked in close quarters (as compared with the isolation of the farm), and contributed to the social decay of the second half of the 1800s. Sanitation was poor or nonexistent, sewage disposal from the growing population was lacking, cities were filthy, public laws were weak or nonexistent, and congestion of the cities inevitably brought pests in the form of rats, lice, and bedbugs, which transmitted many pathogens. Communicable diseases continued to plague the population, especially those who lived in these unsanitary environments. For example, during the mid1700s typhus and typhoid fever claimed twice as many lives each year as did the Battle of Waterloo (Hanlon & Pickett, 1984). Through foreign trade and immigration, infectious diseases were spread to all of Europe and eventually to the growing United States. The Chadwick Report Edwin Chadwick became a major figure in the development of the field of public health in Great Britain by drawing attention to the cost of the unsanitary conditions that shortened the life span of the laboring class and threatened the wealth of Britain. Although the first sanitation legislation, which established a National Vaccination Board, was passed in 1837, Chadwick found in his classic study, Report on an Inquiry into the Sanitary Conditions of the Labouring Population of Great Britain, that death rates were high in large industrial cities such as Liverpool. A more startling finding, from what is often referred to simply as the Chadwick Report, was that more than half the children of labor-class workers died by age 5, indicating poor living conditions that affected the health of the most vulnerable. Laborers lived only half as long as the upper classes. One consequence of the report was the establishment in 1848 of the first board of health, the General Board of Health for England (Richardson, 1887). More legislation followed that initiated social reform in the areas of child welfare, elder care, the sick, the mentally ill, factory health, and education. Soon sewers and fireplugs, based on an available water supply, appeared as indicators that the public health linkages from the Chadwick Report had an impact. The Shattuck Report In the United States during the 1800s, waves of epidemics of yellow fever, smallpox, cholera, typhoid fever, and typhus continued to plague the population as in England and the rest of the world. As cities continued to grow in the industrialized young nation, poor workers crowded into larger cities and suffered from illnesses caused by the unsanitary living conditions 39 (Hanlon & Pickett, 1984). Similar to Chadwick’s classic study in England, Lemuel Shattuck, a Boston bookseller and publisher who had an interest in public health, organized the American Statistical Society in 1839 and issued a census of Boston in 1845. Shattuck’s census revealed high infant mortality rates and high overall population mortality rates. In 1850, in his Report of the Massachusetts Sanitary Commission, Shattuck not only outlined his findings on the unsanitary conditions, but also made recommendations for public health reform that included the bookkeeping of population statistics and development of a monitoring system that would provide information to the public about environmental, food, and drug safety and infectious disease control (Rosen, 1958). He also called for services for well-child care, schoolage children’s health, immunizations, mental health, health education for all, and health planning. The Shattuck Report was revolutionary in its scope and vision for public health, but it was virtually ignored during Shattuck’s lifetime. Nineteen years later, in 1869, the first state board of health was formed (Kalisch & Kalisch, 1986). And Then There Was Nightingale… Florence Nightingale was named one of the 100 most influential persons of the last millennium by Life magazine (The 100 people who made the millennium, 1997). She was one of only eight women identified as such. Of those eight women, including Joan of Arc, Helen Keller, and Elizabeth I, Nightingale was identified as a true “angel of mercy,” having reformed military health care in the Crimean War and used her political savvy to forever change the way society views the health of the vulnerable, the poor, and the forgotten. She is probably one of the most written about women in history (Bullough & Bullough, 1978). Florence Nightingale has become synonymous with modern nursing. Florence Nightingale was the second child born on May 12, 1820, to the wealthy English family of William and Frances Nightingale in her namesake city, Florence, Italy. As a young child, Florence displayed incredible curiosity and intellectual abilities not common to female children of the Victorian age. She mastered the fundamentals of Greek and Latin, and she studied history, art, mathematics, and philosophy. To her family’s dismay, she believed that God had called her to be a nurse. Nightingale was keenly aware of the suffering that industrialization created; she became obsessed with the plight of the miserable and suffering people. Conditions of general starvation accompanied the Industrial Revolution, prisons and workhouses overflowed, and persons in all sections of British life were displaced. She wrote in the spring of 1842, “My mind is absorbed with the sufferings of man; it besets me behind and before…. All that the poets sing of the glories of this world seem to me untrue. All the people that I see are eaten up with care or poverty 40 or disease” (Woodham-Smith, 1951, p. 31). For Nightingale, her entire life would be haunted by this conflict between the opulent life of gaiety that she enjoyed and the plight and misery of the world, which she was unable to alleviate. She was, in essence, an “alien spirit in the rich and aristocratic social sphere of Victorian England” (Palmer, 1977, p. 14). Nightingale remained unmarried, and at the age of 25, she expressed a desire to be trained as a nurse in an English hospital. Her parents emphatically denied her request, and for the next 7 years, she made repeated attempts to change their minds and allow her to enter nurse training. She wrote, “I crave for some regular occupation, for something worth doing instead of frittering my time away on useless trifles” (Woodham-Smith, 1951, p. 162). During this time, she continued her education through the study of math and science and spent 5 years collecting data about public health and hospitals (Dietz & Lehozky, 1963). During a tour of Egypt in 1849 with family and friends, Nightingale spent her 30th year in Alexandria with the Sisters of Charity of St. Vincent de Paul, where her conviction to study nursing was only reinforced (Tooley, 1910). While in Egypt, Nightingale studied Egyptian, Platonic, and Hermetic philosophy; Christian scripture; and the works of poets, mystics, and missionaries in her efforts to understand the nature of God and her “calling” as it fit into the divine plan (Calabria, 1996; Dossey, 2000). The next spring, Nightingale traveled unaccompanied to the Kaiserwerth Institute in Germany and stayed there for 2 weeks, vowing to return to train as a nurse. In June 1851, Nightingale took her future into her own hands and announced to her family that she planned to return to Kaiserwerth and study nursing. According to Dietz and Lehozky (1963, p. 42), her mother had “hysterics” and scene followed scene. Her father “retreated into the shadows,” and her sister, Parthe, expressed that the family name was forever disgraced (Cook, 1913). In 1851, at the age of 31, Nightingale was finally permitted to go to Kaiserwerth, and she studied there for 3 months with Pastor Fliedner. Her family insisted that she tell no one outside the family of her whereabouts, and her mother forbade her to write any letters from Kaiserwerth. While there, Nightingale learned about the care of the sick and the importance of discipline and commitment of oneself to God (Donahue, 1985). She returned to England and cared for her then ailing father, from whom she finally gained some support for her intent to become a nurse—her lifelong dream. In 1852, Nightingale wrote the essay “Cassandra,” which stands today as a classic feminist treatise against the idleness of Victorian women. Through her voluminous journal writings, Nightingale reveals her inner struggle throughout her adulthood with what was expected of a woman and what she could accomplish with her life. The life expected of an aristocratic woman in 41 her day was one she grew to loathe; throughout her writings, she poured out her detestation of the life of an idle woman (Nightingale, 1979, p. 5). In “Cassandra,” Nightingale put her thoughts to paper, and many scholars believe that her eventual intent was to extend the essay to a novel. She wrote in “Cassandra,” “Why have women passion, intellect, moral activity—these three—in a place in society where no one of the three can be exercised?” (Nightingale, 1979, p. 37). Although uncertain about the meaning of the name Cassandra, many scholars believe that it came from the Greek goddess Cassandra, who was cursed by Apollo and doomed to see and speak the truth but never to be believed. Nightingale saw the conventional life of women as a waste of time and abilities. After receiving a generous yearly endowment from her father, Nightingale moved to London and worked briefly as the superintendent of the Establishment for Gentlewomen During Illness hospital, finally realizing her dream of working as a nurse (Cook, 1913). The Crimean Experience: “I Can Stand Out the War with Any Man” Nightingale’s opportunity for greatness came when she was offered the position of female nursing establishment of the English General Hospitals in Turkey by the secretary of war, Sir Sidney Herbert. Soon after the outbreak of the Crimean War, stories of the inadequate care and lack of medical resources for the soldiers became widely known throughout England (Woodham-Smith, 1951). The country was appalled at the conditions so vividly portrayed in the London Times. Pressure increased on Sir Herbert to react. He knew of one woman who was capable of bringing order out of the chaos and wrote a letter to Nightingale on October 15, 1854, as a plea for her service. Nightingale took the challenge from Sir Herbert and set sail with 38 self-proclaimed nurses with varied training and experiences, of whom 24 were Catholic and Anglican nuns. Their journey to the Crimea took a month, and on November 4, 1854, the brave nurses arrived at Istanbul and were taken to Scutari the same day. Faced with 3,000 to 4,000 wounded men in a hospital designed to accommodate 1,700, the nurses went to work (Kalisch & Kalisch, 1986). The nurses were faced with 4 miles of beds 18 inches apart. Most soldiers were lying naked with no bedding or blanket. There were no kitchen or laundry facilities. The little light present took the form of candles in beer bottles. The hospital was literally floating on an open sewage lagoon filled with rats and other vermin (Donahue, 1985). By taking the newly arrived medical equipment and setting up kitchens, laundries, recreation rooms, reading rooms, and a canteen, Nightingale and her team of nurses proceeded to clean the barracks of lice and filth. Nightingale was in her element. She set out not only to provide humane 42 health care for the soldiers but to essentially overhaul the administrative structure of the military health services (Williams, 1961). Florence Nightingale and Sanitation Although Nightingale never accepted the germ theory, she demanded clean dressings; clean bedding; well-cooked, edible, and appealing food; proper sanitation; and fresh air. After the other nurses were asleep, Nightingale made her famous solitary rounds with a lamp or lantern to check on the soldiers. Nightingale had a lifelong pattern of sleeping few hours, spending many nights writing, developing elaborate plans, and evaluating implemented changes. She seldom believed in the “hopeless” soldier, only one who needed extra attention. Nightingale was convinced that most of the maladies that the soldiers suffered and died from were preventable (Williams, 1961). Before Nightingale’s arrival and her radical and well-documented interventions based on sound public health principles, the mortality rate from the Crimean War was estimated to be from 42% to 73%. Nightingale is credited with reducing that rate to 2% within 6 months of her arrival at Scutari. She did this through careful, scientific epidemiological research (Dietz & Lehozky, 1963). Upon arriving at Scutari, Nightingale’s first act was to order 200 scrubbing brushes. The death rate fell dramatically once Nightingale discovered that the hospital was built literally over an open sewage lagoon (Andrews, 2003). According to Palmer (1982), Nightingale possessed the qualities of a good researcher: insatiable curiosity, command of her subject, familiarity with methods of inquiry, a good background of statistics, and the ability to discriminate and abstract. She used these skills to maintain detailed and copious notes and to codify observations. Nightingale relied on statistics and attention to detail to back up her conclusions about sanitation, management of care, and disease causation. Her now-famous “cox combs” are a hallmark of military health services management by which she diagrammed deaths in the Army from wounds and from other diseases and compared them with deaths that occurred in similar populations in England (Palmer, 1977). Nightingale was first and foremost an administrator: She believed in a hierarchical administrative structure with ultimate control lodged in one person to whom all subordinates and offices reported. Within a matter of weeks of her arrival in the Crimea, Nightingale was the acknowledged administrator and organizer of a mammoth humanitarian effort. From her Crimean experience on, Nightingale involved herself primarily in organizational activities and health planning administration. Palmer contends that Nightingale “perceived the Crimean venture, which was set up as an experiment, as a golden opportunity to demonstrate the efficacy of female nursing” (Palmer, 1982, p. 4). Although Nightingale faced initial resistance 43 from the unconvinced and oppositional medical officers and surgeons, she boldly defied convention and remained steadfastly focused on her mission to create a sanitary and highly structured environment for her “children”—the British soldiers who dedicated their lives to the defense of Great Britain. Through her resilience and insistence on absolute authority regarding nursing and the hospital environment, Nightingale was known to send nurses home to England from the Crimea for suspicious alcohol use and character weakness. It was through this success at Scutari that she began a long career of influence on the public’s health through social activism and reform, health policy, and the reformation of career nursing. Using her well-publicized successful “experiment” and supportive evidence from the Crimea, Nightingale effectively argued the case for the reform and creation of military health care that would serve as the model for people in uniform to the present (D’Antonio, 2002). Nightingale’s ideas about proper hospital architecture and administration influenced a generation of medical doctors and the entire world, in both military and civilian service. Her work in Notes on Hospitals, published in 1860, provided the template for the organization of military health care in the Union Army when the U.S. Civil War erupted in 1861. Her vision for health care of soldiers and the responsibility of the governments that send them to war continues today; her influence can be seen throughout the previous century and into this century as health care for the women and men who serve their country is a vital part of the well-being of not only the soldiers but for society in general (D’Antonio, 2002). Returning Home a Heroine: The Political Reformer When Nightingale returned to London, she found that her efforts to provide comfort and health to the British soldier succeeded in making heroes of both herself and the soldiers (Woodham-Smith, 1951). Both had suffered from negative stereotypes: The soldier was often portrayed as a drunken oaf with little ambition or honor, the nurse as a tipsy, self-serving, illiterate, promiscuous loser. After the Crimean War and the efforts of Nightingale and her nurses, both returned with honor and dignity, nevermore the downtrodden and disrespected. After her return from the Crimea, Florence Nightingale never made a public appearance, never attended a public function, and never issued a public statement (Bullough & Bullough, 1978). She single-handedly raised nursing from, as she put it, “the sink it was” into a respected and noble profession (Palmer, 1977). As an avid scholar and student of the Greek writer Plato, Nightingale believed that she had a moral obligation to work primarily for the good of the community. Because she believed that education 44 formed character, she insisted that nursing must go beyond care for the sick; the mission of the trained nurse must include social reform to promote the good. This dual mission of nursing—caregiver and political reformer—has shaped the profession as we know it today. LeVasseur (1998) contends that Nightingale’s insistence on nursing’s involvement in a larger political ideal is the historical foundation of the field and distinguishes us from other scientific disciplines, such as medicine. How did Nightingale accomplish this? She effected change through her wide command of acquaintances: Queen Victoria was a significant admirer of her intellect and ability to effect change, and Nightingale used her position as national heroine to get the attention of elected officials in Parliament. She was tireless and had an amazing capacity for work. She used people. Her brother-in-law, Sir Harry Verney, was a member of Parliament and often delivered her “messages” in the form of legislation. When she wanted the public incited, she turned to the press, writing letters to the London Times and having others of influence write articles. She was not above threats to “go public” by certain dates if an elected official refused to establish a commission or appoint a committee. And when those commissions were formed, Nightingale was ready with her list of selected people for appointment (Palmer, 1982). Nightingale and Military Reforms The first real test of Nightingale’s military reforms came in the United States during the Civil War. Nightingale was asked by the Union to advise on the organization of hospitals and care of the sick and wounded. She sent recommendations back to the United States based on her experiences and analysis in the Crimea, and her advisement and influence gained wide publicity. Following her recommendations, the Union set up a sanitary commission and provided for regular inspection of camps. She expressed a desire to help with the Confederate military also but, unfortunately, had no channel of communication with them (Bullough & Bullough, 1978). The Nightingale School of Nursing at St. Thomas: The Birth of Professional Nursing The British public honored Nightingale by endowing 50,000 pounds sterling in her name upon her return to England from the Crimea. The money had been raised from the soldiers under her care and donations from the public. This Nightingale Fund eventually was used to create the Nightingale School of Nursing at St. Thomas, which was to be the beginning of professional nursing (Donahue, 1985). Nightingale, at the age of 40, decided that St. Thomas’ Hospital was the place for her training school for nurses. While the negotiations for the school went forward, she spent her time writing Notes 45 on Nursing: What It Is and What It Is Not (Nightingale, 1860). The small book of 77 pages, written for the British mother, was an instant success. An expanded library edition was written for nurses and used as the textbook for the students at St. Thomas. The book has since been translated into many languages, although it is believed that Nightingale refused all royalties earned from the publication of the book (Cook, 1913; Tooley, 1910). The nursing students chosen for the new training school were handpicked; they had to be of good moral character, sober, and honest. Nightingale believed that the strong emphasis on morals was critical to gaining respect for the new “Nightingale nurse,” with no possible ties to the disgraceful association of past nurses. Nursing students were monitored throughout their 1-year program both on and off the hospital grounds; their activities were carefully watched for character weaknesses, and discipline was severe and swift for violators. Accounts from Nightingale’s journals and notes reveal instant dismissal of nursing students for such behaviors as “flirtation, using the eyes unpleasantly, and being in the company of unsavory persons.” Nightingale contended that “the future of nursing depends on how these young women behave themselves” (Smith, 1934, p. 234). She knew that the experiment at St. Thomas to educate nurses and raise nursing to a moral and professional calling was a drastic departure from the past images of nurses and would take extraordinary women of high moral character and intelligence. Nightingale knew every nursing student, or probationer, personally, often having the students at her house for weekend visits. She devised a system of daily journal keeping for the probationers; Nightingale herself read the journals monthly to evaluate their character and work habits. Every nursing student admitted to St. Thomas had to submit an acceptable “letter of good character,” and Nightingale herself placed graduate nurses in approved nursing positions. One of the most important features of the Nightingale School was its relative autonomy. Both the school and the hospital nursing service were organized under the head matron. This was especially significant because it meant that nursing service began independently of the medical staff in selecting, retaining, and disciplining students and nurses (Bullough & Bullough, 1978). Nightingale was opposed to the use of a standardized government examination and the movement for licensure of trained nurses. She believed that schools of nursing would lose control of educational standards with the advent of national licensure, most notably those related to moral character. Nightingale led a staunch opposition to the movement by the British Nurses’ Association (BNA) for licensure of trained nurses, one the BNA believed critical to protecting the public’s safety by ensuring the qualification of nurses by licensure exam. Nightingale was convinced that qualifying a nurse by examination tested only the acquisition of technical skills, not the equally 46 important evaluation of character. She believed nursing involved “divergencies too great for a single standard to be applied” (Nutting & Dock, 1907; Woodham-Smith, 1951). Taking Health Care to the Community: Nightingale and Wellness Early efforts to distinguish hospital from community health nursing are evidence of Nightingale’s views on “health nursing,” which she distinguished from “sick nursing.” She wrote two influential papers, one in 1893, “SickNursing and Health-Nursing” (Nightingale, 1893), which was read in the United States at the Chicago Exposition, and the second, “Health Teaching in Towns and Villages” in 1894 (Monteiro, 1985). Both papers praised the success of prevention-based nursing practice. Winslow (1946) acknowledged Nightingale’s influence in the United States by being one of the first in the field of public health to recognize the importance of taking responsibility for one’s health. She wrote in 1891 that “There are more people to pick us up and help us stand on our own two feet” (Attewell, 1996). According to Palmer (1982), Nightingale was a leader in the wellness movement long before the concept was identified. Nightingale saw the nurse as the key figure in establishing a healthy society. She saw a logical extension of nursing in acute hospital settings to the community. Clearly, through her Notes on Nursing, she visualized the nurse as “the nation’s first bulwark in health maintenance, the promotion of wellness, and the prevention of disease” (Palmer, 1982, p. 6). William Rathbone, a wealthy ship owner and philanthropist, is credited with the establishment of the first visiting nurse service, which eventually evolved into district nursing in the community. He was so impressed with the private duty nursing care that his sick wife had received at home that he set out to develop a “district nursing service” in Liverpool, England. At his own expense, in 1859, he developed a corps of nurses trained to care for the sick poor in their homes (Bullough & Bullough, 1978). He divided the community into 16 districts; each was assigned a nurse and a social worker that provided nursing and health education. His experiment in district nursing was so successful that he was unable to find enough nurses to work in the districts. Rathbone contacted Nightingale for assistance. Her recommendation was to train more nurses, and she advised Rathbone to approach the Royal Liverpool Infirmary with a proposal for opening another training school for nurses (Rathbone, 1890; Tooley, 1910). The infirmary agreed to Rathbone’s proposal, and district nursing soon spread throughout England as successful “health nursing” in the community for the sick poor through voluntary agencies (Rosen, 1958). Ever the visionary, Nightingale contended that “Hospitals are but an intermediate stage of civilization. The 47 ultimate aim is to nurse the sick poor in their own homes (1893)” (Attewell, 1996). She also wrote in regard to visiting families at home: “We must not talk to them or at them but with them (1894)” (Attewell, 1996). A similar service, health visiting, began in Manchester, England, in 1862 by the Manchester and Salford Sanitary Association. The purpose of placing “health visitors” in the home was to provide health information and instruction to families. Eventually, health visitors evolved to provide preventive health education and district nurses to care for the sick at home (Bullough & Bullough, 1978). Although Nightingale is best known for her reform of hospitals and the military, she was a great believer in the future of health care, which she anticipated should be preventive in nature and would more than likely take place in the home and community. Her accomplishments in the field of “sanitary nursing” extended beyond the walls of the hospital to include workhouse reform and community sanitation reform. In 1864, Nightingale and William Rathbone once again worked together to lead the reform of the Liverpool Workhouse Infirmary, where more than 1,200 sick paupers were crowded into unsanitary and unsafe conditions. Under the British Poor Laws, the most desperately poor of the large cities were gathered into large workhouses. When sick, they were sent to the Workhouse Infirmary. Trained nursing care was all but nonexistent. Through legislative pressure and a welldesigned public campaign describing the horrors of the Workhouse Infirmary, reform of the workhouse system was accomplished by 1867. Although not as complete as Nightingale had wanted, nurses were in place and being paid a salary (Seymer, 1954). The Legacy of Nightingale Scores have been written about Nightingale—an almost mythic figure in history. She truly was a beloved legend throughout Great Britain by the time she left the Crimea in July 1856, 4 months after the war. Longfellow immortalized this “Lady with the Lamp” in his poem “Santa Filomena” (Longfellow, 1857). However, when Nightingale returned to London after the Crimean War, she remained haunted by her experiences related to the soldiers dying of preventable diseases. She was troubled by nightmares and had difficulty sleeping in the years that followed (Woodham-Smith, 1983). Nightingale became a prolific writer and a staunch defender of the causes of the British soldier, sanitation in England and India, and trained nursing. As a woman, she was not able to hold an official government post, nor could she vote. Historians have had varied opinions about the exact nature of the disability that kept her homebound for the remainder of her life. Recent scholars have speculated that she experienced post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) from her experiences in the Crimea; there is also 48 considerable evidence that she suffered from the painful disease brucellosis (Barker, 1989; Young, 1995). She exerted incredible influence through friends and acquaintances, directing from her sick room sanitation and poor law reform. Her mission to “cleanse” spread from the military to the British Empire; her fight for improved sanitation both at home and in India consumed her energies for the remainder of her life (Vicinus & Nergaard, 1990). According to Monteiro (1985), two recurrent themes are found throughout Nightingale’s writings about disease prevention and wellness outside the hospital. The most persistent theme is that nurses must be trained differently and instructed specifically in district and instructive nursing. She consistently wrote that the “health nurse” must be trained in the nature of poverty and its influence on health, something she referred to as the “pauperization” of the poor. She also believed that above all, health nurses must be good teachers about hygiene and helping families learn to better care for themselves (Nightingale, 1893). She insisted that untrained, “good intended women” could not substitute for nursing care in the home. Nightingale pushed for an extensive orientation and additional training, including prior hospital experience, before one was hired as a district nurse. She outlined the qualifications in her paper “On Trained Nursing for the Sick Poor,” in which she called for a month’s “trial” in district nursing, a year’s training in hospital nursing, and 3 to 6 months training in district nursing (Monteiro, 1985). She said, “There is no such thing as amateur nursing.” The second theme that emerged from her writings was the focus on the role of the nurse. She clearly distinguished the role of the health nurse in promoting what we today call self-care. In the past, philanthropic visitors in the form of Christian charity would visit the homes of the poor and offer them relief (Monteiro, 1985). Nightingale believed that such activities did little to teach the poor to care for themselves and further “pauperized” them —dependent and vulnerable—keeping them unhealthy, prone to disease, and reliant on others to keep them healthy. The nurse then must help the families at home manage a healthy environment for themselves, and Nightingale saw a trained nurse as being the only person who could pull off such a feat. She stated, “Never think that you have done anything effectual in nursing in London, till you nurse, not only the sick poor in workhouses, but those at home.” By 1901, Nightingale lived in a world without sight or sound, leaving her unable to write. Over the next 5 years, Nightingale lost her ability to communicate and most days existed in a state of unconsciousness. In November of 1907, Nightingale was honored with the Order of Merit by King Edward VII, the first time ever given to a woman. After 50 years, in May 1910, the Nightingale Training School of Nursing at St. Thomas celebrated its Jubilee. There were now more than a thousand training schools 49 for nurses in the United States alone (Cook, 1913; Tooley, 1910). Nightingale died in her sleep around noon on August 13, 1910, and was buried quietly and without pomp near the family’s home at Embley, her coffin carried by six sergeants of the British Army. Only a small cross marks her grave at her request: “FN. Born 1820. Died 1910.” (Brown, 1988). The family refused a national funeral and burial at Westminster Abbey out of respect for Nightingale’s last wishes. She had lived for 90 years and 3 months. Continued Development of Professional Nursing in the United Kingdom Although Florence Nightingale opposed registration, based on the belief that the essential qualities of a nurse could not be taught, examined, or regulated, registration in the United Kingdom began in the 1880s. The Hospitals Association maintained a voluntary registry that was an administrative list. In an effort to protect the public led by Ethel Fenwick, the BNA was formed in 1887 with its charter granted in 1893 to unite British nurses and to provide registration as evidence of systematic training. Finally, in 1919, nurse registration became law. It took 30 years and the tireless efforts of Ethel Fenwick, who was supported by other nursing leaders such as Isla Stewart, Lucy Osbourne, and Mary Cochrane, to achieve mandated registration (Royal British Nurses’ Association, n.d.). Another milestone in British nursing history was the founding in 1916 of the College of Nursing as the professional organization for trained nurses. For a century, the organization has focused on professional standards for nurses in their education, practice, and working conditions. Although the principles of a professional organization and those of a trade union have not always fit together easily, the Royal College of Nursing has pursued its role as both the professional organization for nurses and the trade union for nurses (McGann, Crowther, & Dougall, 2009). Today the Royal College of Nursing is recognized as the voice of nursing by the government and the public in the United Kingdom (Royal College of Nursing, n.d.). The Development of Professional Nursing in Canada Marie Lollet Hebert, the wife of a surgeon-apothecary, is credited by many 50 with being the first person in present-day Canada to provide nursing care to the sick as she assisted her husband after arriving in Quebec in 1617; however, the first trained nurses arrived in Quebec to care for the sick in 1639. These nurses were Augustine nuns who traveled to Canada to establish a medical mission to care for the physical and spiritual needs of their patients, and they established the first hospital in North America, the HôtelDieu de Québec. These nuns also established the first apprenticeship program for nursing in North America. Jeanne Mance came from France to the French colony of Montreal in 1642 and founded the Hôtel Dieu de Montréal in 1645 (Canadian Museum of History, n.d.). The hospital of the early 19th century did not appeal to the Canadian public. They were primarily homes for the poor and were staffed by those of a similar class, rather than by nurses (Mansell, 2004). The decades of the 1830s and 1840s in Canada were characterized by an influx of immigrants and outbreaks of diseases such as cholera. There is evidence that it was difficult, especially in times of outbreak, to find sufficient people to care for the sick. Little is known of the hospital “nurses” of this era, but the descriptions are unflattering and working in the hospital environment was difficult. Early midwives did have some standing in the community and were employed by individuals, although there is record of charitable organizations also employing midwives (Young, 2010). During the Crimean War and American Civil War, nurses were extremely effective in providing treatment and comfort not only to battlefield casualties, but also to individuals who fell victim to accidents and infectious disease; however, it was in the North-West Rebellion of 1885 that Canadian nurses performed military service for the first time. At first, the nursing needs identified were for duties such as making bandages and preparing supplies. It soon became apparent that more direct participation by nurses was needed if the military was to provide effective medical field treatment. Seven nurses, under the direction of Reverend Mother Hannah Grier Coome, served in Moose Jaw and Saskatoon, Saskatchewan. Although their tour of duty lasted only 4 weeks, these women proved that nursing could, and should in the future, play a vital role in providing treatment to wounded soldiers. In 1899, the Canadian Army Medical Department was formed, followed by the creation of the Canadian Army Nursing Service. Nurses received the relative rank, pay, and allowances of an army lieutenant. Nursing sisters served thereafter in every military force sent out from Canada, from the South African War to the Korean War (Veterans Affairs Canada, n.d.). In 1896, Lady Ishbel Aberdeen, wife of the governor-general of Canada, visited Vancouver. During this visit, she heard vivid accounts of the hardship and illness affecting women and children in rural areas. Later that same year at the National Council of Women, amid similar stories, a resolution was 51 passed asking Lady Aberdeen to found an order of visiting nurses in Canada. The order was to be a memorial to the 60th anniversary of Queen Victoria’s ascent to the throne of the British Empire; it received a royal charter in 1897. The first Victorian Order of Nurses (VON) sites were organized in the cities of Ottawa, Montreal, Toronto, Halifax, Vancouver, and Kingston. Today the VON delivers over 75 different programs and services such as prenatal education, mental health services, palliative care services, and visiting nursing through 52 local sites staffed by 4,500 healthcare workers and over 9,016 volunteers (VON, 2009). By the mid to late 19th century, despite previous negativity, nursing came to be viewed as necessary to progressive medical interventions. To make the work of the nurse acceptable, changes had to be made to the prevailing view of nursing. In the 1870s, the ideas of Florence Nightingale were introduced in Canada. Dr. Theophilus Mack imported nurses who had worked with Nightingale and founded the first training school for nurses in Canada at St. Catharine’s General Hospital in 1873. Many hospitals appeared across Canada from 1890 to 1910, and many of them developed training schools for nurses. By 1909, there were 70 hospital-based training schools in Canada (Mansell, 2004). In 1908, Mary Agnes Snively, along with 16 representatives from organized nursing bodies, met in Ottawa to form the Canadian National Association of Trained Nurses (CNATN). By 1924, each of the nine provinces had a provincial nursing organization with membership in the CNATN. In 1924, the name of the CNATN was changed to the Canadian Nurses Association (CNA). CNA is currently a federation of 11 provincial and territorial nursing associations and colleges representing nearly 150,000 registered nurses (CNA, n.d.). In 1944, the CNA approved the principle of collective bargaining. In 1946, the Registered Nurses Association of British Columbia became the first provincial nursing association to be certified as a bargaining agent. By the 1970s, other provincial nursing organizations gained this right. Between 1973 and 1987, nursing unions were created. Today, each of the 10 provinces has a nursing union in addition to a professional association (Ontario Nurses’ Association, n.d.). One of the best known of these professional associations is the Registered Nurses’ Association of Ontario (RNAO). Established in 1925 to advocate for healthy public policy, promote excellence in nursing practice, increase nursing’s contribution to shaping the healthcare system, and influence decisions that affect nurses and the public they serve, the RNAO is the professional association representing registered nurses, nurse practitioners (NPs), and nursing students in Ontario (RNAO, n.d.). Through the RNAO, nurses in Canada have led the world in systematic implementation of evidence-based practice and have made their best practice 52 guidelines available to all nurses to promote safe and effective care of patients. As Canadians entered the decade of the 1960s, there was serious concern about the healthcare system. In 1961, all Canadian provinces signed on to the Hospital Insurance and Diagnostic Services Act. This legislation created a national, universal health insurance system. The same year, the Royal Commission on Health Services was established and presented four recommendations. One of the recommendations was to examine nursing education. Prior to this, the CNA had requested a survey of nursing schools across Canada with the goal of assessing how prepared the schools were for a national system of accreditation. The findings of this survey, paired with the commission’s recommendation, led to the establishment of the Canadian Nurses Foundation (CNF) in 1962. The CNF provides funding for nurses to further their education and for research related to nursing care (CNF, 2014). The Canadian Association of Schools of Nursing is the organization that promotes national nursing education standards and is the national accrediting agency for university nursing programs in Canada (n.d.). Nursing in Canada transformed itself to meet the needs of a changing Canadian society, and in doing so was responsible for a shift from nursing as a spiritual vocation to a secular but indispensable profession. Nurses’ willingness to respond in times of need, whether economic, epidemic, or war, contributed to their importance in the healthcare system (Mansell, 2004). Canadian nursing associations agreed that starting in the year 2000, the basic educational preparation for the registered nurse would be the baccalaureate degree, and all provinces and territories launched a campaign known as EP 2000, which later became EP 2005. Currently, the baccalaureate degree earned from a university is the accepted entry level into nursing practice in Canada (Mansell, 2004). The Development of Professional Nursing in Australia In the earliest days of the colony, the care of the sick was performed by untrained convicts. Male attendants undertook the supervision of male patients and female attendants undertook duties with the female patients. Attention to hygiene standards was almost nonexistent. In 1885, the poor health and living conditions of disadvantaged sick persons in Melbourne prompted a group of concerned citizens to meet and form the Melbourne District Nursing Society. This society was formed to look after sick poor persons at home to prevent unnecessary hospitalization. Home visiting services also have a long history in Australia, with Victoria being the first state to introduce a district nursing service in 1885, followed by South 53 Australia in 1894, Tasmania in 1896, New South Wales in 1900, Queensland in 1904, and Western Australia in 1905 (Australian Bureau of Statistics, 1985). Australian nurses were involved in military nursing as civilian volunteers as early as the 1880s (The University of Melbourne, 2015); however, involvement of Australian women as nurses in war began in 1898 with the formation of the Australian Nursing Service of New South Wales, which was composed of 1 superintendent and 24 nurses. Based on the performance of the nurses, the Australian Army Nursing Service was formed in 1903 under the control of the federal government. The Royal Australian Army Nursing Corps (RAANC) had its beginnings in the Australian Army Nursing Service (RAANC, n.d.). Since that time, Australian nurses have dealt with war, the sick, the wounded, and the dead. They have served in Australia, in war zones around the world, in field hospitals, on hospital ships anchored off shore near battlefields, and on transports (Australian Government, 2009). Other military opportunities for nurses include the Royal Australian Navy and the Royal Australian Air Force. Nursing registration in Australia began in 1920 as a state-based system. Prior to 1920, nurses received certificates from the hospitals where they trained, the Australian Trained Nurses Association (ATNA), or the Royal British Nurses’ Association in order to practice. Today nurses and midwives are registered through the Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia (NMBA), which is made up of member state and territorial boards of nursing and supported by the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency. State and territorial boards are responsible for making registration and notification decisions related to individual nurses or midwives (NMBA, n.d.). Around the turn of the 20th century, in order to create a formal means of supporting their role and improve nursing standards and education, the nurses of South Australia formed the South Australian branch of ATNA. It is from this organization that the Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation in South Australia (ANMFSA) evolved (ANMFSA, 2012). The Australian Nursing and Midwifery Accreditation Council (ANMAC) is now the independent accrediting authority for nursing and midwifery under Australia’s National Registration and Accreditation Scheme. The ANMAC is responsible for protecting and promoting the safety of the Australian community by promoting high standards of nursing and midwifery education through the development of accreditation standards, accreditation of programs, and assessment of internationally qualified nurses and midwives for migration (ANMAC, 2014). In the late 1920s, two nurses, Evelyn Nowland and a Miss Clancy, began working separately on the idea of a union for nurses and were brought together by Jessie Street, who saw the improvement of nurses’ wages and 54 conditions as a feminist cause. What is now the New South Wales Nurses and Midwives’ Association (NSWNMA) was registered as a trade union in 1931 (NSWNMA, 2014). Through the amalgamation of various organizations, there is now one national organization to represent registered nurses, enrolled nurses, midwives, and assistants doing nursing work in every state and territory throughout Australia: the Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation (ANMF). The organization was established in 1924 and serves as a union for nurses with an ultimate goal of improving patient care. The ANMF is now composed of eight branches: the Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation (South Australia branch), the NSWNMA, the Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation Victorian Branch, the Queensland Nurses Union, the Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation Tasmanian Branch, the Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation Australian Capital Territory, the Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation Northern Territory, and the Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation Western Australian Branch (ANMF, 2015). Early Nursing Education and Organization in the United States Formal nursing education in the United States did not begin until 1862, when Dr. Marie Zakrzewska opened the New England Hospital for Women and Children, which had its own nurse training program (Sitzman & Judd, 2014b). Many of the first training schools for nursing were modeled after the Nightingale School of Nursing at St. Thomas in London. They included the Bellevue Training School for Nurses in New York City; the Connecticut Training School for Nurses in New Haven, Connecticut; and the Boston Training School for Nurses at Massachusetts General Hospital (Christy, 1975; Nutting & Dock, 1907). Based on the Victorian belief in the natural abilities of women to be sensitive, possess high morals, and be caregivers, early nursing training required that applicants be female. Sensitivity, high moral character, purity of character, subservience, and “ladylike” behavior became the associated traits of a “good nurse,” thus setting the “feminization of nursing” as the ideal standard for a good nurse. These historical roots of gender-and race-based caregiving continued to exclude males and minorities from the nursing profession for many years and still influence career choices for men and women today. These early training schools provided a stable, subservient, white female workforce because student nurses served as the primary nursing staff for these early hospitals. Minority nurses found limited educational opportunities in this climate. The first African American nursing school graduate in the United States was Mary P. Mahoney. She graduated from the New England Hospital for Women and Children in 1879 (Sitzman & Judd, 2014b). 55 CRITICAL THINKING QUESTIONS✶ Some nurses believe that Florence Nightingale holds nursing back and represents the negative and backward elements of nursing. This view cites as evidence that Nightingale supported the subordination of nurses to physicians, opposed registration of nurses, and did not see mental health nurses as part of the profession. Wheeler (1999) has gone so far as to say, “The nursing profession needs to exorcise the myth of Nightingale, not necessarily because she was a bad person, but because the impact of her legacy has held the profession back too long.” After reading this chapter, what do you think? Is Nightingale relevant in the 21st century to the nursing profession? Why or why not?✶ Nursing education in the newly formed schools was based on accepted practices that had not been validated by research. During this time in history, nurses primarily relied on tradition to guide practice, rather than engaging in research to test interventions; however, scientific advances did help to improve nursing practice as nurses altered interventions based on knowledge generated by scientists and physicians. During this time, a nurse, Clara Maass, gave her life as a volunteer subject in the research of yellow fever (Sitzman & Judd, 2014b). A significant report, known simply as the Goldmark Report, Nursing and Nursing Education in the United States, was released in 1922 and advocated the establishment of university schools of nursing to train nursing leaders. The report, initiated by Nutting in 1918, was an exhaustive and comprehensive investigation into the state of nursing education and training resulting in a 500-page document. Josephine Goldmark, social worker and author of the pioneering research of nursing preparation in the United States, stated, From our field study of the nurse in public health nursing, in private duty, and as instructor and supervisor in hospitals, it is clear that there is need of a basic undergraduate training for all nurses alike, which should lead to a nursing diploma. (Goldmark, 1923, p. 35) The first university school of nursing was developed at the University of Minnesota in 1909. Although the new nurse training school was under the college of medicine and offered only a 3-year diploma, the Minnesota program was nevertheless a significant leap forward in nursing education. Nursing for the Future, or the Brown Report, authored by Esther Lucille Brown in 1948 and sponsored by the Russell Sage Foundation, was critical of the quality and structure of nursing schools in the United States. The Brown Report became the catalyst for the implementation of educational nursing program accreditation through the National League for Nursing (Brown, 1936, 1948). As a result of the post–World War II nursing shortage, an 56 Associate Degree in Nursing was established by Dr. Mildred Montag in 1952 as a 2-year program for registered nurses (Montag, 1959). In 1950, nursing became the first profession for which the same licensure exam, the State Board Test Pool, was used throughout the nation to license registered nurses. This increased mobility for the registered nurse resulted in a significant advantage for the relatively new profession of nursing (State board test pool examination, 1952). The Evolution of Nursing in the United States: The First Century of Professional Nursing The Profession of Nursing Is Born in the United States Early nurse leaders of the 20th century included Isabel Hampton Robb, who in 1896 founded the Nurses’ Associated Alumnae, which in 1911 officially became known as the American Nurses Association (ANA); and Lavinia Lloyd Dock, who became a militant suffragist linking women’s roles as nurses to the emerging women’s movement in the United States. Mary Adelaide Nutting, Lavinia L. Dock, Sophia Palmer, and Mary E. Davis were instrumental in developing the first nursing journal, the American Journal of Nursing (AJN) in October 1900. Through the ANA and the AJN, nurses then had a professional organization and a national journal with which to communicate with each other (Kalisch & Kalisch, 1986). State licensure of trained nurses began in 1903 with the enactment of North Carolina’s licensure law for nursing. Shortly thereafter, New Jersey, New York, and Virginia passed similar licensure laws for nursing. Over the next several years, professional nursing was well on its way to public recognition of practice and educational standards as state after state passed similar legislation. Margaret Sanger worked as a nurse on the Lower East Side of New York City in 1912 with immigrant families. She was astonished to find widespread ignorance among these families about conception, pregnancy, and childbirth. After a horrifying experience with the death of a woman from a failed self-induced abortion, Sanger devoted her life to teaching women about birth control. A staunch activist in the early family planning movement, Sanger is credited with founding Planned Parenthood of America 57 (Sanger, 1928). By 1917, the emerging new profession saw two significant events that propelled the need for additional trained nurses in the United States: World War I and the influenza epidemic. Nightingale and the devastation of the Civil War had well established the need for nursing care in wartime. Mary Adelaide Nutting, now Professor of Nursing and Health at Columbia University, chaired the newly established Committee on Nursing in response to the need for nurses as the United States entered the war in Europe. Nurses in the United States realized early that World War I was unlike previous wars. It was a global conflict that involved coalitions of nations against nations and vast amounts of supplies and demanded the organization of all the nations’ resources for military purposes (Kalisch & Kalisch, 1986). Along with Lillian Wald and Jane A. Delano, Director of Nursing in the American Red Cross, Nutting initiated a national publicity campaign to recruit young women to enter nurses’ training. The Army School of Nursing, headed by Annie Goodrich as dean, and the Vassar Training Camp for Nurses prepared nurses for the war as well as home nursing and hygiene nursing through the Red Cross (Dock & Stewart, 1931). The committee estimated that there were at the most about 200,000 active “nurses” in the United States, both trained and untrained, which was inadequate for the military effort abroad (Kalisch & Kalisch, 1986). At home, the influenza epidemic of 1917 to 1919 led to increased public awareness of the need for public health nursing and public education about hygiene and disease prevention. The successful campaign to attract nursing students focused heavily on patriotism, which ushered in the new era for nursing as a profession. By 1918, nursing school enrollments were up by 25%. In 1920, Congress passed a bill that provided nurses with military rank (Dock & Stewart, 1931). Following close behind, the passage of the Nineteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution granted women the right to vote. L…
Purchase answer to see full attachment

the importance of prioritization and delegation in nursing

the importance of prioritization and delegation in nursing

Create a thread on the importance of prioritization and delegation in nursing in a paragraph and give 3 different responses to give to classmates.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

Mucor Discussion

Mucor Discussion

Please write a paragraph responding to the discussion bellow. Add citations and references in alphabetical order.

Mucor is a mold found in soil, plants, manure, decaying fruits, vegetables and as a common contaminant of stored and processed food in the kitchen, specifically cheese ripening and Asian fermented food production. Mucormycosis is a serious but rear fungal infection caused by a group of molds called mucoromycetes ( CDC). According to CDC, there are five clinical forms of Mucormycosis but the most common one is Rhinocerebra Mucormycosis which occur mostly in diabetic patient, neutropenic cancer patients and hematopoietic stem cell transplant or solid organ transplant recipients and pulmonary Mucormycosis. Other things that can put people at risk of developing Mucormycosis are prolonged corticosteroid therapy; skin trauma, burns, or surgical wounds; iron overload; intravenous drug use; malnourishment and premature infants.

Patients is likely to get infected with Mucor by inhalation, immunization, or ingestion of spores from the environment. The environmental spores can come from Dung in dry areas like southern California, Arizona, and Florida in the winter before the rains and cold sets in. When the spores are inhaled, it travels through the alveoli and bronchioles of the lungs causing inflammation and pneumonia with clinical exhibition of fever, cough, chest pain and dyspnea.

Treatment is with antifungal medication usually, Amphotericin B, Parconazole or Isavuconazole. Surgery may also be required to cut out the affected tissue. Nursing intervention include monitoring of vital signs and laboratory result administration of oxygen when clinically required, teaching cough etiquette, placing the patient in semi to high fowlers to aid with respirations and comfort, IV therapies, and keeping accurate record of intake and output.

2. laboratory result:
The white blood count (WBC) is high 15,200 this shows that patient have infection because of Mucor inhalation, showing the body’s attempt to fight the infection. Arterial blood gas is abnormal because of the high PH 7.50, PaC02 is 25 and PaCO3 25, these three ABG results shows respiratory alkalosis. Patient SPO 59 room air is low, oxygen should be given to increase the level and enhance respiration and oxygen exchange with the lower left side of the chest x-ray showing whited out. The x-ray also shows a poor heart silhouette with good showing of the diaphragmatic arches.

3. Medication and medical treatment.

Three medications that can be used for treatment of Mucormycosis are; Amphotericin B, Parconazole or Isavuconazole (CDC).These medications attack the structure of and function of fungal cells. They also inhibit the DNA synthesis of fungus and prevent the spreading. Amphotericin binds to the fungal cell membrane causing it to leak the cellular content. Surgery may also be required to cut away the affected tissue (CDC).Finally, controlling immunocompromising condition should be attempted (CDC).

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

References.

Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Information for healthcare professionals about Mucormycosis. Retrieved

School Aged Development Assessment

School Aged Development Assessment

The needs of the pediatric patient differ depending on age, as do the stages of development and the expected

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

assessment findings for each stage. In a 500-750-word paper, examine the needs of a school-aged child between the ages of 5 and 12 years old and discuss the following:

Compare the physical assessments among school-aged children. Describe how you would modify assessment techniques to match the age and developmental stage of the child.
Choose a child between the ages of 5 and 12 years old. Identify the age of the child and describe the typical developmental stages of children that age.
Applying developmental theory based on Erickson, Piaget, or Kohlberg, explain how you would developmentally assess the child. Include how you would offer explanations during the assessment, strategies you would use to gain cooperation, and potential findings from the assessment.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

******** please make the assignment above in APA style, follow instrutions, add citation and references 🙂 *****

Level 1 and Level 2 Question/Writing Prompts Assignment

Level 1 and Level 2 Question/Writing Prompts Assignment

Hindawi Pain Research and Management Volume 2017, Article ID 8328174, 9 pages

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8328174 Review Article School Anxiety in Children and Adolescents with Chronic Pain K. E. Jastrowski Mano Department of Psychology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA Correspondence should be addressed to K. E. Jastrowski Mano; manokn@ucmail.uc.edu Received 3 July 2017; Accepted 14 August 2017; Published 26 September 2017 Academic Editor: Susanne Becker Copyright © 2017 K. E. Jastrowski Mano. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Anxiety is highly prevalent in pediatric chronic pain. This comorbidity has been explained by the presence of shared mechanisms underlying the development and maintenance of chronic pain and anxiety. Accumulating evidence demonstrates that school is a significant source of anxiety among youth with chronic pain and that anxiety contributes to school-related functional impairment in this population. This article reviews the cooccurrence of pediatric chronic pain and anxiety, identifies unique sources of heightened school anxiety among youth with chronic pain, and describes current approaches for assessing anxiety in pediatric pain settings. Highlighted by this review is the absence of a comprehensive evidence-based approach for assessing school anxiety in pediatric chronic pain. Given the psychometric limitations inherent to gathering data from a single source, recommendations for advancing measurement methods are provided. Novel approaches may be needed to shed more light on the way in which school anxiety is experienced in pediatric chronic pain. 1. Introduction Emerging evidence has shown that anxiety is an important factor in pediatric chronic pain [1]. Anxiety is significantly more common in youth with chronic pain than in the general population [2–4]. This comorbidity is a critically important health problem. It is associated with poorer response to painfocused cognitive-behavioral interventions [5] and increased risk for both chronic pain [6] and anxiety disorders in adulthood [7]. School can be a significant source of anxiety among pediatric chronic pain patients. School anxiety comprises several domains of academic and interpersonal distress, such as fears pertaining to academic performance, negative teacher evaluations, and peer relationships [8]. School anxiety is a significant concern among health care professionals as it is often linked with school avoidance behavior [9–12]. Though related, school anxiety and school avoidance (a term often used interchangeably with school refusal [13]) are distinct constructs. (Of note, though the terms school refusal and school avoidance have been used interchangeably, the term school avoidance has predominantly been used in the pediatric chronic pain literature [12]. School refusal is the more common term in the child anxiety literature [11] and has been applied more broadly to include youth exhibiting a variety of internalizing and externalizing (e.g., aggression, truancy) behaviors [13]. School avoidance, on the other hand, is primarily linked to internalizing (e.g., anxiety) rather than externalizing problems in the school environment [12].) Although anxiety is characterized by disruptions in multiple domains (e.g., cognitive, affective, and behavioral), the term school anxiety is typically used to describe the cognitive-affective (e.g., fear, worry) domain, whereas school avoidance is viewed as a behavioral manifestation of anxiety [11, 12] or a serious behavioral complication accompanying anxiety disorders in youth [14]. In other words, school avoidance is a pattern in which a child experiences severe anxiety related to school and thus avoids it, fostering frequent absenteeism as well as heightened anxiety [15]. School anxiety is not a recognized diagnostic category in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), at this time [16]. However, evidence of significant anxiety in the context of school warrants further diagnostic clarification, as it may be associated with a number of different DSM-5 clinical disorders (e.g., separation anxiety disorder, social anxiety disorder, or generalized anxiety disorder) [14, 17]. Despite overwhelming evidence of school anxiety among pediatric pain patients [18–20], research focused specifically 2 on the measurement of school anxiety symptoms remains largely undeveloped. There is a need for more tailored assessment strategies targeting school anxiety in pediatric chronic pain [20–23] as clarifying the nature and extent of school anxiety in pediatric chronic pain has important implications for theory, assessment, and intervention. This paper reviews the (i) comorbidity between pediatric chronic pain and anxiety, (ii) sources of heightened school anxiety, in particular, among youth with chronic pain, and (iii) existing approaches for assessing school anxiety. To guide future research on this understudied topic, suggestions for advancing the measurement of school anxiety are provided. This discussion includes a consideration of both traditional self-report methods as well as the potential role of novel, implicit assessment strategies toward improving our understanding of school anxiety. 2. Comorbidity between Chronic Pain and Anxiety Anxiety symptoms are prevalent in pediatric chronic pain [3, 20] with upwards of 80% of chronic pain patients meeting criteria for an anxiety disorder based on structured diagnostic interviews [24, 25]. This has led to the call for routine screening for anxiety disorders in youth with functional abdominal pain [26] and in other pediatric pain populations [20]. Given that pain and anxiety are both associated with physiological arousal (e.g., accelerated heart rate, increased respiration rate, and muscular tension), it may be assumed that the high prevalence of anxiety symptoms in pediatric chronic pain is solely attributable to overlapping somatic symptoms (e.g., dizziness, difficulty breathing). However, this is not the case. Youth with chronic pain experience a wide range of anxiety disorder symptoms, including separation anxiety and social anxiety, which have fewer physiological symptoms included within the diagnostic criteria [20, 22]. For example, Tran and colleagues [20] found that 46% of pediatric chronic pain patients reported clinical elevations on at least one anxiety subscale on the Screen for Child Anxiety-Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED). Notably, the most common clinical elevations were on the school phobia, separation anxiety, and social anxiety subscales. 2.1. Shared Mechanisms of Pediatric Chronic Pain and Anxiety. The shared vulnerability model [27] posits that there is a similar underlying diathesis for chronic pain and anxiety. Specifically, the shared vulnerability model applies a diathesis-stress framework, postulating that individuals who are at increased risk for the development of chronic pain and/or an anxiety disorder share predisposing vulnerabilities, including anxiety sensitivity and reduced threshold for alarm, which give rise to particular negative emotional responses—namely, fear and anxiety—in the face of stressful events. Consequences of fear and anxiety, including attentional biases, avoidance behavior, and autonomic nervous system arousal, further contribute to the development of chronic pain, anxiety disorders, and their cooccurrence. Pain Research and Management Though originally developed to explain the cooccurrence of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and chronic pain in adults, aspects of the shared vulnerability model have been well supported by research in pediatric populations. For example, anxiety sensitivity (i.e., fear of fear) has been shown to increase the risk for pain-related avoidance and disability in youth with chronic pain [28, 29]. In research with healthy children, anxious symptomatology is directly related to pain sensitivity; and anxiety sensitivity impacts pain intensity indirectly via its effects on pain-related anticipatory anxiety (e.g., [30]). Children with recurrent abdominal pain and children with anxiety disorders show indistinguishable laboratory stress responsivity [31, 32]. Notably, children with recurrent abdominal pain may be less likely to endorse trait anxiety and anxiety symptoms on self-report measures, despite demonstrating similar levels of state anxiety and physiological arousal in response to laboratory stressors [31]. Also included in the shared vulnerability model is avoidance behavior, as a characteristic of both anxious populations and chronic pain patients. The fear avoidance model is often used to explain avoidance in the context of pediatric chronic pain [33]. For instance, Simons and Kaczynski [33] describe similarities between youth with anxiety and pediatric patients with chronic pain, such that both groups tend to struggle with social (e.g., socializing with friends) and academic (e.g., attending school) developmental tasks. This often results in activity avoidance and, for many, significant disruptions in social and academic domains of functioning [3, 18, 34]. Finally, longitudinal research suggests that pain in childhood predicts anxiety in adulthood, even when pain symptoms have abated [7]. This is consistent with the shared vulnerability model such that common predisposing factors (e.g., anxiety sensitivity) and maintenance factors (e.g., avoidance behavior [35], attentional biases [36]) that are central to both conditions may connote heightened risk for the development and continuation of pain and/or anxiety across the lifespan. 3. School-Related Anxiety and Impairment in Pediatric Chronic Pain Chronic pain in children and adolescents is associated with impaired school functioning in multiple domains [2, 3, 34, 35, 37–42]. In fact, school absence rates in pediatric chronic pain possibly exceed rates of absenteeism due to other chronic health conditions [34]. Youth with chronic pain who frequently experience periods of missed school often fall behind academically as a result of their pain symptoms [18, 23, 35, 37, 38]. Chronic pain patients also report lower grades and other maladaptive school-related behaviors following the onset of pain [37, 39]. Anxiety appears to be a key driving force behind the school disability and avoidant behavior that often characterizes youth with chronic pain [33, 40]. About one-third of youth with chronic pain exhibit anxiety-related school avoidance [23]. Anxiety is also a robust predictor of difficulties with keeping up academically and concentrating at school [12, 23, 35]. Anxiety has been shown to be a stronger predictor of functional disability than pain severity [23]. Further, in the Pain Research and Management context of high levels of anxiety and worry, pain is unrelated to school functioning [40] or overall functional disability [33]. Thus, research suggests that anxiety plays a central role in maintaining school disability by driving school avoidant behavior, thus perpetuating a cycle of avoidance that, in turn, further heightens anxiety [39]. It is not surprising that the coupling of anxiety and pediatric chronic pain creates an especially high risk for school-related disability [22]. Several studies have demonstrated seasonal patterns of pain and anxiety complaints, indicating that these difficulties frequently cooccur, may influence each other, and fluctuate corresponding to the school year [43–46]. For example, Saps and colleagues [46] found that consultations for anxiety and complaints about abdominal pain were most common in the winter months, declining throughout the summer months and steadily rising again in the fall. They speculated that the winter dominance of pain-related and psychiatric complaints in children is attributable to school-related anxiety and stress. Showing a very similar pattern—and drawing the same conclusion—a recent study found that the volume of parent phone calls made to a pediatric pain clinic pertaining to headache and abdominal pain was approximately three times higher during the winter [47]. 4. Specific Sources of School Anxiety among Chronic Pain Patients School is a source of anxiety among youth with chronic pain, supported by the aforementioned evidence of high rates of anxiety and school avoidance exhibited in this population. School anxiety plays an important role in both getting to school and functioning while at school [23, 35]. For example, school anxiety frequently peaks on school day mornings—manifesting in a variety of anxious and somatic symptoms—resulting in parents deciding to let their child stay home from school [12]. When at school, youth with chronic pain may worry about whether pain symptoms will negatively influence their test-taking performance or bother them while trying to participate in other academic or social activities. Though chronic pain patients understandably have a heightened sensitivity to experiencing physical symptoms when at school (e.g., what if my stomach starts to hurt after I eat my lunch?), school represents a myriad of other sources of anxiety as well. As is to be expected during childhood and adolescence, some pediatric chronic pain patients likely experience some degree of anxiety regarding their grades, performance on standardized tests, and other aspects of their academic performance. Not surprisingly, youth with chronic pain often report feeling as though pain has negatively impacted their school success [39]. It makes sense then that youth with chronic pain, who not only need to grapple with the typical test-related performance stress, also have the additional burden of worrying about the degree to which pain symptoms may distract them during important academic situations. To date, there is no published data establishing the degree to which youth with chronic pain struggle with specific types of academic anxiety, such as test anxiety or 3 performance-related anxiety (e.g., giving speeches in front of class). The social aspects of school likely also give rise to anxiety. Research suggests that approximately 20 to 25% of youth with chronic pain report elevated social anxiety scores [20]. Likewise, given the high prevalence of public speaking anxiety in childhood [48] it is probable that a good number of chronic pain patients experience heightened fear of speaking in front of others at school—which may occur in the context of class presentations, but also in subtler forms such as raising one’s hand during class to ask the teacher a question. Finally, youth with chronic pain may also worry about teachers’ perceptions, perhaps sensing that teachers are unsupportive or misunderstand the pain problem. Such concerns are not unwarranted, as teachers have been shown to lack a biopsychosocial framework for understanding chronic pain in childhood [49]. This is concerning given how common it is for chronic pain patients to need to initiate conversations with one or more teachers in regard to classroom accommodations (e.g., requesting permission to leave class to go to the nurse’s office), assignment accommodations (e.g., requesting deadline extensions), or school absences. Social-evaluative concerns are developmentally appropriate during childhood and adolescence. However, chronic pain patients may face additional challenges, such as feeling different than peers due to having a pain condition or finding it challenging to explain their pain condition or reasons for school absences to peers. Children and adolescents with chronic pain may have fewer friends, be more socially isolated, and experience higher rates of peer victimization compared to youth without pain [50]. To the degree that youth with chronic pain perceive social situations at school as threatening, over time, they may develop fear-related avoidance behavior toward school [33]. Forgeron et al. [51] found social information processing differences between youth with chronic pain and healthy controls. Specifically, adolescents with chronic pain showed heightened sensitivity to vignettes depicting potentially nonsupportive social situations. When asked to envision themselves as a healthy friend in vignettes, adolescents with chronic pain indicated that they would have enacted more supportive behaviors toward a chronic pain vignette character. The authors suggested that youth with chronic pain may expect more supportive behaviors from their friends and when they perceive friends at school as being unsupportive may distance themselves socially and avoid particular social situations [51]. In a recent study examining adolescents’ interpretation biases, it was found that those who reported greater pain catastrophizing and more recent pain complaints endorsed more negative interpretations (and rejected more benign interpretations) of ambiguous situations regarding pain and bodily threat [52]. Interestingly, these adolescents showed the same pattern for ambiguous social situations, suggesting a generalized rather than pain-specific interpretation pattern—and a pattern that would be expected of those experiencing anxiety in general or social anxiety specifically. Though speculative, it may be that youth who are vulnerable to interpreting ambiguous situations as threatening tend to 4 apply such interpretations broadly. This would be consistent with the shared vulnerability model of chronic pain and anxiety [27, 53], as well as research suggesting that youth with chronic pain have more difficulty attending to and interpreting social cues [54]. In other words, youth at increased risk for developing negative bodily threat interpretations—a risk factor for the development of chronic pain—may exhibit similar cognitive biases that increase their risk for the development and/or maintenance of anxiety disorder symptoms. Parent influences are also important to consider. Robust evidence demonstrates that parental protectiveness in response to pain confers risk for school impairment in youth with chronic pain [55] and has been shown to mediate the relationship between parental pain catastrophizing and child school attendance rates and general school impairment [56]. Furthermore, there is evidence to suggest that parental distress operates, at least in part, through amplification of child anxiety. For example, etiological studies suggest that parental anxiety is a crucial factor in the development of childhood anxiety [57, 58] and has been shown to predict children’s physiological reactivity following stress [59]. These findings underscore the importance of evaluating parental anxiety and parental responses to children’s school anxiety symptoms, as both are likely important contributors to the child’s affective and behavioral responses to stressors occurring in the school environment. In summary, school represents a context in which youth with chronic pain experience significant anxiety and schoolrelated functional disability. There are many unique sources of school-related anxiety, such as fear of academic failure or inability to keep up with demands, fear of negative peer evaluation, and fear of experiencing physical symptoms at school. Knowing that youth with chronic pain generally experience elevated school anxiety is not specific enough to guide intervention efforts. Thus, all potential sources of school anxiety should be assessed because each one may be a unique treatment target [22, 23]. 5. Assessment of School Anxiety: Current Practice and Limitations The primary measurement issue stalling efforts to understand school anxiety in pediatric pain is simple—there are no instruments designed for this particular purpose. A measure specifically focused on school anxiety has yet to be developed or normed for use in pediatric pain settings. Thus, despite growing recognition of the importance of evaluating school anxiety in pediatric chronic pain [20, 22], clinicians and researchers lack a comprehensive evidence-based approach for doing so. Current methods for assessing anxiety among pediatric pain patients consist of using either broadband measures of psychopathology symptoms that include one or more anxiety-related subscales, or narrow-band anxiety measures, such as the Multidimensional Anxiety Scale for Children (MASC) [60], Revised Children’s Manifest Anxiety Scale (RCMAS) [61], or the Screen for Child Anxiety-Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED) [62]. One key concern Pain Research and Management regarding this practice is that although these anxiety measures have demonstrated strong psychometric properties in the general population or in treatment-seeking psychiatric samples, few have been validated for use in pediatric settings [63]. This calls into question whether current measures of anxiety—regardless of their psychometric properties in other samples—are appropriate for youth with pediatric chronic pain. Existing anxiety measures also lack adequate content validity for the assessment of school anxiety specifically. For example, the MASC contains only two items that explicitly mention school as a context for anxiety symptoms (“I worry about being called on in class” and “I try hard to obey my parents and teachers”). Other MASC items may apply to how the child feels at school but do not specifically refer to school situations or school peers (e.g., “I worry about what other people think of me”). Similarly, though the SCARED has shown good evidence of internal consistency and construct validity when used in a treatment-seeking pediatric chronic pain sample [22], the primary caveat for its usage is its lack of an appropriate school anxiety subscale. The SCARED School Phobia subscale showed poor internal consistency—likely due to problems with content validity, in terms of both item content and scope. Specifically, the School Phobia subscale comprises only four items; thus it lacks the necessary breadth to adequately measure a multifaceted construct like school anxiety. When used in pediatric pain settings, the fact that some School Phobia items also mention specific pain symptoms is especially problematic [22]. 6. Future Directions in the Assessment of School Anxiety Current assessment approaches limit our understanding of the precise fears of youth with chronic pain. This has led to a call for more research to address gaps in the assessment of school anxiety [20–22]. Given the limitations of using broad anxiety measures to gauge school anxiety, one possibility would be to expand the school-related content of existing selfreport anxiety measures, such as the SCARED. An arguably better solution would be to develop a new, multifaceted school anxiety measure—one that includes items assessing fears pertaining to academic performance, such as test anxiety and falling behind on assignments, negative teacher evaluations, and peer relationships—that could be validated for use in pediatric chronic pain. Because anxiety in pediatric chronic pain may manifest itself in ways that existing instruments were not developed to evaluate, it would be advantageous to gather input from pain patients to ensure that item content is relevant to and representative of the way in which school anxiety is experienced. For example, though not typically included in measures of school anxiety in nonmedical populations, it may be clinically relevant to include content pertaining to fears about pain symptoms interfering with academic performance or concerns about having to ask the teacher to go the nurse’s office. This focus on content validity would help determine the most relevant content to include, the irrelevant content Pain Research and Management to exclude, and how to best achieve content balance (i.e., avoiding excessive over- or underemphasis of some aspects of social anxiety) [64]. These are important issues regardless of whether an existing anxiety self-report measure is modified or a completely new instrument is developed. Existing measures of related constructs, such as school refusal, may also be relevant for capturing behavioral complications associated with school anxiety in pediatric chronic pain. The School Refusal Assessment Scale-Revised (SRASR) [65] measures four hypothesized functions of school refusal, including avoidance of stimuli that provoke negative affect and escape from aversive social situations. Similarly, the School Refusal section of the Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule (ADIS-IV) [14] assesses whether a child has difficulty going to or staying at school and, if so, queries potential reasons for school refusal. Given that these measures have not been validated for use with pediatric pain patients, or more broadly, for youth with cooccurring anxiety and chronic medical conditions, items will likely need to be tailored. For instance, the SRAS-R may require the modification and/or addition of content that more clearly distinguishes school avoidance due to pain symptoms versus other (nonpain) factors. Some youth with chronic pain may report that school avoidance occurs exclusively in response to pain symptoms, whereas others may be able to identify academic and social factors that also keep them from going to school (e.g., they feel as though they do not have many friends at school; they are afraid of tests or riding the school bus). It may also prove useful to explore other measures that have been developed particularly for pediatric chronic pain that may capture some aspects or correlates of school anxiety. Measures of pain anxiety, pain catastrophizing, and fear of pain, while not focused on school situations specifically, may be helpful when developing school anxiety measures in this population. Such measures would make it possible to distinguish youth whose fear and avoidance are limited to the school context from those who manifest a more generalized pattern of pain avoidance. This would strengthen the discriminant validity of school anxiety measurement. Given the psychometric issues inherent to gathering data from a single source [66], it is imperative to include multiple perspectives. Teachers and other key school personnel are uniquely positioned to provide insights based on their direct observations of the child’s behavior at school, including how the child functions in the classroom and in his or her interactions with peers. Parent-proxy reports are valuable in discerning the child’s school-related anxiety symptoms at home, such as heightened anxiety on school day mornings compared to weekends, distress about upcoming tests, and difficulty keeping up with homework assignments. Novel measurement approaches may also be needed due to the numerous challenges inherent to assessing schoolrelated fears in pediatric chronic pain with self-report methodology. For instance, youth with chronic pain often underreport anxiety [21, 33, 38]. Logan and colleagues [21] found that 31% of their pain sample likely minimized anxiety on a self-report measure by responding in a socially desirable manner. As mentioned previously, children with chronic pain have shown to be less likely to self-report anxiety but 5 responded to a threatening stressor with the same degree of anxiety and physiological stress reactivity as children with anxiety disorders [31]. Moreover, youth often verbally report wanting to attend school and experiencing minimal anxiety, despite exhibiting school avoidance behavior [35]. It has been argued that some youth with chronic pain who experience school anxiety may have difficulty identifying or articulating specific precipitating stresses. Other youth may be unaware of the extent of their school anxiety, identifying pain symptoms as the sole reason for not being able to attend school [12]. 6.1. Potential Utility of Novel Implicit Measures. Multiple methods are needed to evaluate different facets of any problem. Given the limitations of self-report measures of school anxiety in the context of pediatric pain, novel implicit measures may represent an important assessment tool to circumvent youths’ difficulty with overtly discussing schoolrelated fears and reason(s) for school avoidance. Implicit measures, in conjunction with subjective self-reports, have the potential to shed new light on the way in which school anxiety is experienced in pediatric chronic pain. Evaluation of implicit school-related attentional biases may be a useful approach in discerning the most salient facets of school anxiety. Attentional biases involve implicit, preferential tendencies to orient attention to particular threatening stimuli [67]. Various cognitive theories (e.g., attentional control theory) assert that anxiety is characterized by an attentional bias toward personally relevant, threatening stimuli [68]. Attentional biases have been implicated in both the development and maintenance of anxiety disorders [69–71]. In other words, attentional biases have been shown to be associated with current anxiety symptoms and also confer risk for the development of anxiety [72]. Though extant theories make different assumptions about the precise role that attentional biases play in anxiety (e.g., whether they play a causal role or not), available evidence suggests that attentional biases and anxiety are mutually maintaining [73]. Attentional biases represent a potential mechanism underlying the cooccurrence of chronic pain and anxiety [27, 53]. Attentional biases in the context of school, though implicit, may influence school functioning even when a particular behavior (e.g., school avoidance; [12]) stands in opposition to long-term goals (resuming or maintaining adaptive school functioning). To date, only pain-related attentional biases have been examined in pediatric chronic pain [54, 74, 75]. There remains a dearth of research considering other types of attentional biases that may be relevant to pediatric chronic pain patients. When considering school as a source of threat in the lives of youth who experience chronic pain, attentional biases for stimuli that become associated with pain and anxiety, such as school-related triggers, may become risk factors for the perpetuation of school anxiety and chronic pain symptoms over time [36, 76]. Studies characterizing the mechanism(s) underlying school-related attentional biases exhibited by youth with chronic pain may be important. Eye-tracking methods— which are able to continuously and directly measure attention—are able to assess various patterns of attention. For example, school anxious youth may demonstrate an 6 attentional bias driven by an initial orienting bias that involves a constant visual search of the environment for schoolrelated threat, such that the child’s attention is more quickly captured by school-related threatening stimuli relative to other stimuli. Here, the child shows hypervigilance to school threat stimuli. An attentional bias may also be driven by an attention maintenance bias involving difficulty disengaging from school-related threat, wherein, after the child fixates upon a school-related stimulus, he/she is unable to shift attention away from the threatening stimulus. This pattern suggests excessive cognitive processing of threat. Finally, an attentional bias may be characterized by a vigilanceavoidance pattern that involves an orienting bias toward school-related threat (momentary fixation upon a stimulus) followed by avoidance of the stimulus. Here, the child scans the environment for a threat stimulus, and once they find it, they actively avoid it. Notably, all three patterns have been identified in the literature. While the above hypothetical scenarios share many facets of cognitive processing, they are distinct enough to warrant scientific inquiry so as to advance our understanding of the specific pattern(s) of school-related attentional biases (e.g., hypervigilance or vigilance-avoidance) that may exist in pediatric chronic pain. It is possible that particular patterns of school-related attentional biases connote a higher risk for school anxiety. For example, based on recent work in test anxiety [77], it is plausible that youth with chronic pain who show a pattern of early attentional engagement followed by avoidance of school-related threat are at particular risk for school anxiety. 7. Conclusion Both chronic pain and school anxiety in childhood are associated with concurrent and long-term impairment [41, 78–80]. An evidence-based approach for assessing school anxiety in pediatric chronic pain is needed, as existing measures fail to adequately capture this specific form of anxiety [20, 22, 81]. More research is needed to improve upon or develop new self-report measures of school anxiety. Implicit measures, in conjunction with subjective self-reports, may have the potential to shed new light on the way in which school anxiety is experienced in pediatric chronic pain. Conflicts of Interest The author reports no conflicts of interest. Pain Research and Management with chronic pain,” Pain Research and Management, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 93–97, 2012. [2] P. G. Ramchandani, M. Fazel, A. Stein, N. Wiles, and M. Hotopf, “The impact of recurrent abdominal pain: Predictors of outcome in a large population cohort,” Acta Paediatrica, International Journal of Paediatrics, vol. 96, no. 5, pp. 697–701, 2007. [3] L. M. Dufton, M. J. Dunn, and B. E. Compas, “Anxiety and somatic complaints in children with recurrent abdominal pain and anxiety disorders,” Journal of Pediatric Psychology, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 176–186, 2009. [4] L. M. E. Knook, J. G. Lijmer, A. Y. Konijnenberg, P. M. Hordijk, and H. Van Engeland, “Quality of life and academic functioning 6 years after paediatric referral for chronic pain,” Acta Paediatrica, International Journal of Paediatrics, vol. 101, no. 9, pp. 957–963, 2012. [5] N. R. Cunningham, A. Jagpal, S. T. Tran et al., “Anxiety Adversely Impacts Response to Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Children with Chronic Pain,” Journal of Pediatrics, vol. 171, pp. 227–233, 2016. [6] L. S. Walker, C. M. Dengler-Crish, S. Rippel, and S. Bruehl, “Functional abdominal pain in childhood and adolescence increases risk for chronic pain in adulthood,” Pain, vol. 150, no. 3, pp. 568–572, 2010. [7] G. D. Shelby, K. C. Shirkey, A. L. Sherman et al., “Functional abdominal pain in childhood and long-term vulnerability to anxiety disorders,” Pediatrics, vol. 132, no. 3, pp. 475–482, 2013. [8] M. C. Martı́nez-Monteagudo, C. J. Inglés, M. V. Trianes, and J. M. Garcı́a-Fernández, “Profiles of school anxiety: Differences in social climate and peer violence,” Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 1023–1042, 2011. [9] H. L. Egger, E. J. Costello, and A. Angolf, “School refusal and psychiatric disorders: A community study,” Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 797–807, 2003. [10] J. M. Ingul and H. M. Nordahl, “Anxiety as a risk factor for school absenteeism: What differentiates anxious school attenders from non-attenders?” Annals of General Psychiatry, p. 25, 2013. [11] C. A. Kearney, School refusal behavior in youth: A functional approach to assessment and treatment, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, USA, 2001. [12] R. J. Ladwig and K. A. Khan, “School health,” Journal for Specialists in Pediatric Nursing, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 210–212, 2007. [13] C. A. Kearney and A. M. Albano, “The functional profiles of school refusal behavior: Diagnostic aspects,” Behavior Modification, vol. 28, pp. 147–161, 2004. Acknowledgments [14] W. K. Silverman and A. M. Albano, Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for DSM-IV (ADIS-IV): Child and Parent Interview Schedules, Graywind Publications, New York, NY, USA, 2004. This work was supported by funding from a National Science Foundation ADVANCE Institutional Transformation UC LEAF mini grant (1010013 I/O# M16929) awarded to K. E. Jastrowski Mano. [15] C. Hansen, S. L. Sanders, S. Massaro, and C. G. Last, “Predictors of severity of absenteeism in children with anxiety-based school refusal,” Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, vol. 27, pp. 246–254, 1998. References [16] Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, American Psychiatric Association, Arlington, Va, USA, 5th edition, 2013. [1] L. E. Simons, C. B. Sieberg, and R. L. Claar, “Anxiety and functional disability in a large sample of children and adolescents [17] M. P. Mychailyszyn, J. L. Mendez, and P. C. Kendall, “School functioning in youth with and without anxiety disorders: Pain Research and Management Comparisons by diagnosis and comorbidity,” School Psychology Review, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 106–121, 2010. [18] A. Roth-Isigkeit, U. Thyen, H. Stöven, J. Schwarzenberger, and P. Schmucker, “Pain among children and adolescents: restrictions in daily living and triggering factors,” Pediatrics, vol. 115, no. 2, pp. e152–e162, 2005. [19] A. F. Sato, K. R. Hainsworth, K. A. Khan, R. J. Ladwig, S. J. Weisman, and W. H. Davies, “School absenteeism in pediatric chronic pain: Identifying lessons learned from the general school absenteeism literature,” Children’s Health Care, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 355–372, 2007. [20] S. T. Tran, K. E. Jastrowski Mano, K. Anderson Khan, W. H. Davies, and K. R. Hainsworth, “Patterns of anxiety symptoms in pediatric chronic pain as reported by youth, mothers, and fathers,” Clinical Practice in Pediatric Psychology, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 51–62, 2016. [21] D. E. Logan, R. L. Claar, and L. Scharff, “Social desirability response bias and self-report of psychological distress in pediatric chronic pain patients,” Pain, vol. 136, no. 3, pp. 366–372, 2008. [22] K. E. Jastrowski Mano, J. R. Evans, S. T. Tran, K. Anderson Khan, S. J. Weisman, and K. R. Hainsworth, “The psychometric properties of the screen for child anxiety related emotional disorders in pediatric chronic pain,” Journal of Pediatric Psychology, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 999–1011, 2012. [23] K. A. Khan, S. T. Tran, K. E. Jastrowski Mano, P. M. Simpson, Y. Cao, and K. R. Hainsworth, “Predicting Multiple Facets of School Functioning in Pediatric Chronic Pain,” Clinical Journal of Pain, vol. 31, no. 10, pp. 867–875, 2015. [24] M. Liakopoulou-Kairis, T. Alifieraki, D. Protagora et al., “Recurrent abdominal pain and headache: Psychopathology, life events and family functioning,” European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 115–122, 2002. [25] J. V. Campo, J. Bridge, M. Ehmann et al., “Recurrent Abdominal Pain, Anxiety, and Depression in Primary Care,” Pediatrics, vol. 113, no. 4 I, pp. 817–824, 2004. [26] N. R. Cunningham, A. Lynch-Jordan, A. G. Mezoff, M. K. Farrell, M. B. Cohen, and S. Kashikar-Zuck, “Importance of addressing anxiety in youth with functional abdominal pain: Suggested guidelines for physicians,” Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 469–474, 2013. [27] G. J. G. Asmundson and J. Katz, “Understanding the cooccurrence of anxiety disorders and chronic pain: state-of-theart,” Depression and Anxiety, vol. 26, no. 10, pp. 888–901, 2009. [28] A. L. Martin, P. A. McGrath, S. C. Brown, and J. Katz, “Anxiety sensitivity, fear of pain and pain-related disability in children and adolescents with chronic pain,” Pain Research and Management, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 267–272, 2007. [29] J. C. I. Tsao, M. Meldrum, S. C. Kim, and L. K. Zeltzer, “Anxiety Sensitivity and Health-Related Quality of Life in Children With Chronic Pain,” Journal of Pain, vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 814–823, 2007. [30] J. C. I. Tsao, Q. Lu, S. C. Kim, and L. K. Zeltzer, “Relationships among anxious symptomatology, anxiety sensitivity and laboratory pain responsivity in children,” Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 207–215, 2006. [31] L. D. Dorn, J. C. Campo, and S. Thato, “Psychological comorbidity and stress reactivity in children and adolescents with recurrent abdominal pain and anxiety disorders,” Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 66–75, 2003. 7 [32] L. M. Dufton, M. J. Dunn, L. S. Slosky, and B. E. Compas, “Selfreported and laboratory-based responses to stress in children with recurrent pain and anxiety,” Journal of Pediatric Psychology, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 95–105, 2011. [33] L. E. Simons and K. J. Kaczynski, “The fear avoidance model of chronic pain: Examination for pediatric application,” Journal of Pain, vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 827–835, 2012. [34] T. M. Palermo, “Impact of recurrent and chronic pain on child and family daily functioning: A critical review of the literature,” Developmental Behav Pediatr, vol. 21, pp. 58–69, 2000. [35] K. A. Khan, R. J. Ladwig, and S. J. Weisman, “School avoidance among complex pediatric chronic pain patients: Identification and multisystemic treatment,” Pain Research and Management, vol. 11, (Suppl B):63B, 2006. [36] G. Crombez, D. M. L. Van Ryckeghem, C. Eccleston, and S. Van Damme, “Attentional bias to pain-related information: A metaanalysis,” Pain, vol. 154, no. 4, pp. 497–510, 2013. [37] C. C. Breuner, M. S. Smith, and W. M. Womack, “Factors Related to School Absenteeism in Adolescents with Recurrent Headache,” Headache, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 217–222, 2004. [38] K. J. Kaczynski, R. L. Claar, and A. A. Lebel, “Relations between pain characteristics, child and parent variables, and school functioning in adolescents with chronic headache: A comparison of tension-type headache and migraine,” Journal of Pediatric Psychology, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 351–364, 2013. [39] D. E. Logan, L. E. Simons, M. J. Stein, and L. Chastain, “School Impairment in Adolescents With Chronic Pain,” Journal of Pain, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 407–416, 2008. [40] L. L. Cohen, K. E. Vowles, and C. Eccleston, “The impact of adolescent chronic pain on functioning: Disentangling the complex role of anxiety,” Journal of Pain, vol. 11, no. 11, pp. 1039– 1046, 2010. [41] T. L. Verduin and P. C. Kendall, “Differential occurrence of comorbidity within childhood anxiety disorders,” Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 290– 295, 2003. [42] M. Wendland, Y. Jackson, and L. D. Stokes, “Functional disability in paediatric patients with recurrent abdominal pain,” Child: Care, Health and Development, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 516–523, 2010. [43] G. Morken, A. M. Sund, and O. M. Linaker, “A help-line for children. Seasonal variations in issues,” Psychiatry Research, vol. 128, no. 2, pp. 191–197, 2004. [44] S. Soriani, E. Fiumana, R. Manfredini et al., “Circadian and seasonal variation of migraine attacks in children,” Headache, vol. 46, no. 10, pp. 1571–1574, 2006. [45] M. Saps, C. Blank, S. Khan et al., “Seasonal variation in the presentation of abdominal pain,” Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, vol. 46, pp. 279–284, 2008. [46] M. Saps, S. Hudgens, R. Mody, K. Lasch, V. Harikrishnan, and C. Baum, “Seasonable patterns of abdominal pain consultations among adults and children,” Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 290–296, 2013. [47] K. E. Jastrowski Mano, R. C. Gibler, L. Rusy, R. J. Ladwig, C. O. Madormo, and K. R. Hainsworth, “Seasonal variation in pediatric chronic pain clinic phone triage call volume,” Pain Management Nursing, 2017. [48] C. B. Pull, “Current status of knowledge on public-speaking anxiety,” Current Opinion in Psychiatry, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 32–38, 2012. 8 Pain Research and Management [49] D. E. Logan, S. P. Catanese, R. M. Coakley, and L. Scharff, “Chronic pain in the classroom: Teachers’ attributions about the causes of chronic pain,” Journal of School Health, vol. 77, no. 5, pp. 248–256, 2007. [65] C. A. Kearney, “Confirmatory factor analysis of the School Refusal Assessment Scale-Revised: Child and parent versions,” Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 139–144, 2006. [50] J. L. Fales and P. A. Forgeron, “Commentary: The importance of friendships in youth with chronic pain: The next critical wave of research,” Pediatric Pain Letter, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 35–39, 2014. [66] G. N. Holmbeck, S. T. Li, J. Verrill Schurman, D. Friedman, and R. Millstein Coakley, “Collecting and managing multisource and multimethod data in studies of pediatric populations,” Journal of Pediatric Psychology, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 5–18, 2002. [51] P. A. Forgeron, P. McGrath, B. Stevens et al., “Social information processing in adolescents with chronic pain: My friends don’t really understand me,” Pain, vol. 152, no. 12, pp. 2773–2780, 2011. [52] L. C. Heathcote, M. Koopmans, C. Eccleston et al., “Negative Interpretation Bias and the Experience of Pain in Adolescents,” Journal of Pain, vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 972–981, 2016. [53] O. Gureje, “Comorbidity of pain and anxiety disorders,” Current Psychiatry Reports, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 318–322, 2008. [54] J. E. Beck, T. A. Lipani, K. F. Baber et al., “Attentional bias to pain and social threat in pediatric patients with functional abdominal pain and pain-free youth before and after performance evaluation,” Pain, vol. 152, no. 5, pp. 1061–1067, 2011. [55] K. J. Kaczynski, R. Lewis Claar, and A. A. LeBel, “Relations between pain characteristics, child and parent variables, and school functioning in adolescents with chronic headache: A comparison of tension-type headache and migraine,” Journal of Pediatric Psychology, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 351–364, 2013. [56] D. E. Logan, L. E. Simons, and E. Carpino, “Too sick for school? Parent influences on school functioning among children with chronic pain,” Pain, vol. 153, pp. 437–443, 2012. [57] V. E. Cobham, M. R. Dadds, and S. H. Spence, “The role of parental anxiety in the treatment of childhood anxiety,” Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, vol. 66, no. 6, pp. 893–905, 1998. [58] S. M. Turner, D. C. Beidel, R. Roberson-Nay, and K. Tervo, “Parenting behaviors in parents with anxiety disorders,” Behaviour Research and Therapy, vol. 41, pp. 541–554, 2003. [59] J. L. Borelli, P. Smiley, D. K. Bond et al., “Parental Anxiety Prospectively Predicts Fearful Children’s Physiological Recovery from Stress,” Child Psychiatry and Human Development, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 774–785, 2014. [60] J. March, Manual for the Multidimensional Anxiety Scale for Children (MASC), Multi-Health Systems, Inc, Toronto, Canada, 1998. [61] C. R. Reynolds and B. O. Richmond, “Factor structure and construct validity of “what i think and feel”: The revised children’s manifest anxiety scale,” Journal of Personality Assessment, vol. 43, no. 3, p. 281, 1979. [62] B. Birmaher, D. A. Brent, L. Chiappetta, J. Bridge, S. Monga, and M. Baugher, “Psychometric properties of the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED): A replication study,” Journal of the American Academy Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, vol. 38, no. 10, pp. 1230–1236, 1999. [63] G. N. Holmbeck, A. W. Thill, P. Bachanas et al., “Evidence-based assessment in pediatric psychology: Measures of psychosocial adjustment and psychopathology,” Journal of Pediatric Psychology, vol. 33, no. 9, pp. 958–980, 2008. [64] S. N. Haynes, D. C. S. Richard, and E. S. Kubany, “Content validity in psychological assessment: a functional approach to concepts and methods,” Psychological Assessment, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 238–247, 1995. [67] A. Bernstein and A. Zvielli, “Attention Feedback Awareness and Control Training (A-FACT): Experimental test of a novel intervention paradigm targeting attentional bias,” Behaviour Research and Therapy, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 18–26, 2014. [68] M. A. Waszczuk, H. M. Brown, T. C. Eley, and K. J. Lester, “Attentional control theory in childhood: Enhanced attentional capture by non-emotional and emotional distractors in anxiety and depression,” PLoS ONE, vol. 10, no. 11, Article ID e0141535, 2015. [69] J. Williams, F. Watts, C. MacLeod, and A. Mathews, Cognitive Psychology and Emotional Disorders, Wiley, Chichester, UK, 2nd edition, 1997. [70] S. G. Hofmann, “Cognitive factors that maintain social anxiety disorder: A comprehensive model and its treatment implications,” Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 193–209, 2007. [71] J. M. Kuckertz and N. Amir, “Cognitive biases in social anxiety disorder,” in Social anxiety: Clinical, Developmental, and Social Perspectives, S. G. Hofman and P. M. DiBartolo, Eds., Elsevier, San Diego, Calif, USA, 3rd edition, 2014. [72] C. M. Sylvester, J. J. Hudziak, M. S. Gaffrey, D. M. Barch, and J. L. Luby, “Stimulus-Driven Attention, Threat Bias, and Sad Bias in Youth with a History of an Anxiety Disorder or Depression,” Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 219–231, 2016. [73] B. Van Bockstaele, B. Verschuere, H. Tibboel, J. De Houwer, G. Crombez, and E. H. W. Koster, “A review of current evidence for the causal impact of attentional bias on fear and anxiety,” Psychological Bulletin, vol. 140, no. 3, pp. 682–721, 2014. [74] M. C. Boyer, B. E. Compas, C. Stanger et al., “Attentional bias to pain and social threat in children with recurrent abdominal pain,” Journal of Pediatric Psychology, vol. 31, pp. 209–220, 2006. [75] S. M. C. Van Der Veek, B. H. F. Derkx, R. D. Plak et al., “Attentional bias to activity of different parts of the body in children with functional abdominal pain: An experimental study,” Journal of Pediatric Psychology, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 438– 449, 2014. [76] C. Eccleston and G. Crombez, “Pain demands attention: a cognitive-affective model of the interruptive function of pain,” Psychological Bulletin, vol. 125, no. 3, pp. 356–366, 1999. [77] Y. Dong, A. De Beuckelaer, L. Yu, and R. Zhou, “Eye-movement evidence of the time-course of attentional bias for threatening pictures in test-anxious students,” Cognition and Emotion, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 781–790, 2017. [78] A. Bittner, H. L. Egger, A. Erkanli, E. Jane Costello, D. L. Foley, and A. Angold, “What do childhood anxiety disorders predict?” Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, vol. 48, no. 12, pp. 1174–1183, 2007. [79] C. A. Kearney, “School absenteeism and school refusal behavior in youth: a contemporary review,” Clinical Psychology Review, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 451–471, 2008. Pain Research and Management [80] L. S. Walker, A. L. Sherman, S. Bruehl, J. Garber, and C. A. Smith, “Functional abdominal pain patient subtypes in childhood predict functional gastrointestinal disorders with chronic pain and psychiatric comorbidities in adolescence and adulthood,” Pain, vol. 153, no. 9, pp. 1798–1806, 2012. [81] E. Fisher, L. Heathcote, T. M. Palermo, C. de Williams, A. C. J. Lau, and C. Eccleston, “Systematic review and meta-analysis: psychological therapies for children with chronic pain,” Journal of Pediatric Psychology, vol. 39, no. 8, pp. 763–782, 2014. 9 Reproduced with permission of copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Purchase answer to see full attachment

Implementation of the IOM Future of Nursing Report

Implementation of the IOM Future of Nursing Report

Details:

In a formal paper of 1,000-1,250 words you will discuss the work of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

Committee Initiative on the Future of Nursing and the Institute of Medicine research that led to the IOM report, “Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health.” Identify the importance of the IOM “Future of Nursing” report related to nursing practice, nursing education and nursing workforce development. What is the role of state-based action coalitions and how do they advance goals of the Future of Nursing: Campaign for Action?

Explore the Campaign for Action webpage (you may need to research your state’s website independently if it is not active on this site): http://campaignforaction.org/states

Review your state’s progress report by locating your state and clicking on one of the six progress icons for: education, leadership, practice, interpersonal collaboration, diversity, and data. You can also download a full progress report for your state by clicking on the box located at the bottom of the webpage.

In a paper of 1,000-1,250 words:

Discuss the work of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Committee Initiative on the Future of Nursing and the Institute of Medicine research that led to the IOM report, “Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health.”
Identify the importance of the IOM “Future of Nursing” report related to nursing practice, nursing education and nursing workforce development.
What is the role of state-based action coalitions and how do they advance goals of the Future of Nursing: Campaign for Action?
Summarize two initiatives spearheaded by your state’s action coalition. In what ways do these initiatives advance the nursing profession? What barriers to advancement currently exist in your state? How can nursing advocates in your state overcome these barriers?

A minimum of three scholarly references are required for this assignment.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

NRS410 GCU Approach To Care Case Study 2

NRS410 GCU Approach To Care Case Study 2

Case Study 2 Case Study 2 Mr. P is a 76-year-old male with cardiomyopathy and congestive heart failure who has

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

been hospitalized frequently to treat CHF symptoms. He has difficulty maintaining diet restrictions and managing his polypharmacy. He has 4+ pitting edema, moist crackles throughout lung fields, and labored breathing. He has no family other than his wife, who verbalizes sadness over his declining health and over her inability to get out of the house. She is overwhelmed with the stack of medical bills, as Mr. P always took care of the financial issues. Mr. P is despondent and asks why God has not taken him. Question Considering Mr. P’s condition and circumstance, write an essay of 500-750 words that includes the following: • • • • Describe your approach to care. Recommend a treatment plan. Describe a method for providing both the patient and family with education and explain your rationale. Provide a teaching plan (avoid using terminology that the patient and family may not understand). © 2013. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Purchase answer to see full attachment

Reviewing Article Related to Health Service Administration

Reviewing Article Related to Health Service Administration

Choose current articles related to Health Services Administration (HSA).

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

Your chosen article must be from a reputable source (journal article, newspaper, etc.) that has a date of publication. The article’s publication date should be from September of 2016 to the current date (this is supposed to be a current event).

Introduction: Explain why you chose your article.
Report content: Explain how your article relates to Health Services Administration (HSA)
Summary: Include your closing thoughts about the article (e.g. How does this affect you as a future health administrator and/or your future patients/clients?).
TWO references are required.
2 – page double spaced paper

Respond with a paragraph, citations and references

Respond with a paragraph, citations and references

Select a global health issue affecting the international health community. Briefly describe the global health issue and its impact on the larger public health care systems (i.e., continents, regions, countries, states, and health departments). Discuss how health care delivery systems work collaboratively to address global health concerns and some of the stakeholders that work on these issues.

(minimum 200 words)

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW