Trancultural Perspectives in Childbearing by Jana Lauderdale

Trancultural Perspectives in Childbearing by Jana Lauderdale

The power point presentation will base on CHAPTER 5 of Trancultural Concepts in Nursing Care by Margaret M.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

ANDREWS and Joyceen S. BOYLE .

Edition 6 or 7

12-15 slides power-point

Rubric for Poster/ Power Point Presentation

TITLE OF PRESENTATION:

GROUP MEMBERS:

Handout

Provides abstract that clearly states purpose of project.

 

Summarizes overall content and relevance to professional nursing.

 

Contains bibliographic references (at least three) that reflect evidence based resources/peer reviewed journals.

 

Bibliographic resources are done in APA format.

 

Content

Presenters able to articulate relationship between presentation and content taught in

course.

 

Information is accurate

Forum: Discussion Forum: Cardiovascular System

Forum: Discussion Forum: Cardiovascular System

A 29-year-old female develops sepsis and, as a consequence, she experiences profound vasodilation.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

a) What effect does vasodilation have on the afterload? Explain why.

b) What effect does vasodilation have on blood pressure? Explain why. How will her body try to bring her blood pressure back to homeostasis?

Be detailed in your explanation and support your answer with facts from your textbook, research, and articles from scholarly journals. In addition, remember to add references in APA format to your posts to avoid plagiarism.

Discussion Forum: Urinary Options Menu: Forum

Discussion Forum: Urinary Options Menu: Forum

Topic 1:

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

Certain villages in India are very conservative and women are required to wear clothes that completely cover their entire body. Unfortunately, these women experience bone pain, fractures, muscle weakness, and depression. Explain the relationship between their attire and the signs and symptoms they are experiencing?

Be detailed in your explanation and support your answer with facts from your textbook, research, and articles from scholarly journals. In addition, remember to add references in APA format to your posts to avoid plagiarism.

NUR6241: Strategic Planning In Healthcare Organizations

NUR6241: Strategic Planning In Healthcare Organizations

NUR6241: Strategic Planning in Healthcare Organizations

Discussion: Developing a Philosophy, Goals, and Objectives

As addressed in this week’s Learning Resources, an organization’s philosophy statement derives from its mission and indicates the values and beliefs that steer decision making. An organization’s philosophy statement should be used to develop goals and objectives that lead to assured action. NUR6241: Strategic Planning in Healthcare Organizations

ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED SOLUTION PAPERS

As effective organizations recognize, “setting specific goals in a clear and compelling way—and insisting that people work together to achieve them—is the best way to get results” (Ashkenas, 2012, para. 9). NUR6241: Strategic Planning In Healthcare Organizations

 

This Discussion builds on the Week 2 Discussion 2, as you create a philosophy statement, goals, and objectives for Mountain View Health Center, the organization featured in the case study introduced last week.

 

You will continue to work within the same small group. Note: You will develop an individual philosophy statement, goals, and objectives independently. Through the collegial exchange that follows, you will offer each other suggestions for refinement.

 

To prepare:

 

Review information on philosophy statements, goals, and objectives in Chapter 7 of the Marquis and Huston text and in the other Learning Resources.

Review the Mountain View Health Center case study presented in this week’s media, and reflect on the mission and vision statements you developed for Discussion 2 in Week 2. NUR6241: Strategic Planning in Healthcare Organizations

Conduct additional research as necessary to strengthen your understanding of the process for creating a philosophy statement and developing goals and objectives and to deepen your thinking about the organization. For instance, you may research organizations with similarities to Mountain View and examine their philosophy statements, goals, and objectives. NUR6241: Strategic Planning In Healthcare Organizations

Draft a philosophy statement for Mountain View Health Center.

Craft at least one goal and at least one related objective to operationalize the philosophy.

Consider what you have learned about the importance of the philosophy statement and the process of developing one, as well as the significance of and distinctions between goals and objectives.

 

Post a philosophy statement for Mountain View Health Center, at least one goal, and at least one related objective. Offer insights you have gained about the process of developing a philosophy statement, as well as the significance of and distinctions between organizational goals and objectives.

 

Read a selection of your colleagues’ responses. Consider the following:

Are the philosophy statements, goals, and objectives clearly written and easy to understand?

How well does the philosophy statement align with the mission and vision statements posted in Discussion 2 of Week 2? Does it reflect accepted values of the organization?

Are the goals and objectives specific, measureable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound?

How well do the philosophy statements, goals, and objectives reflect the stakeholders?

 

Respond to at least two of your colleagues on two different days by evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of their philosophy statements, goals, and objectives. Suggest opportunities for refinement. NUR6241: Strategic Planning in Healthcare Organizations

 

Required Readings

 

Cara, C. M., Nyberg, J. J., & Brousseau, S. (2011). Fostering the coexistence of caring philosophy and economics in today’s health care system. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 35(1), 6–14.

Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.

 

The article addresses caring as a part of mission and philosophy and the benefits of this for nursing satisfaction and performance, patient satisfaction, quality of care, and cost reduction.

Lorenzi, N. M. (2011). AMIA’s realigned strategic plan. Journal of American Medical Informatics Association, 18(2), 203–208.

Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.

 

As you read this article, consider the process used to set goals and evaluate the extent to which the identified goals are specific, measureable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound.

 

 

Kenny, G. (2012). From the stakeholder viewpoint: Designing measurable objectives. Journal of Business Strategy, 33(6), 40–46.

Retrieved from the Walden Library databases. NUR6241: Strategic Planning In Healthcare Organizations

 

Measurable objectives are an important part of the strategic planning process, yet many organizations struggle with formulating good objectives. In this article, the author suggests strategies for developing better objectives, which will then facilitate the planning process.

Urbanski, J., Baskel, M., & Martelli, M. (2011). Strategic planning—A plan for excellence for South Haven Health System. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 35(3), 227–234.

Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.

 

The article addresses stakeholder involvement as a key component of South Haven Health System’s success in strategic planning and describes how the system develops goals and objectives.

Lloyd-Jones, D. M., Hong, Y., Labarthe, D., Mozaffarian, D., Appel, L. J., Van Horn, L., . . . Rosamond, W. D. (2010). Defining and setting national goals for cardiovascular health promotion and disease reduction: The American Heart Association’s strategic impact goal through 2020 and beyond. Retrieved from http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/121/4/586.full.pdf+html

 

As you read this report, consider the process used to set goals and evaluate the extent to which the identified goals are specific, measureable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound.

Required Media

Laureate Education (Producer). (2013b). Case study: Mountain View Health Center [Interactive media]. Retrieved from CDN database. (NURS 6241)

 

This interactive multimedia piece presents a case study of an organization, with information about the types of activities performed there, organizational structure, strategic priorities, and financial allocations. You will use this as a resource for this week’s Discussion.

Optional Resources

Marquis, B. L., & Huston, C. J. (2015). Leadership roles and management functions in nursing: Theory and application (8th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins.

Chapter 7, “Strategic and Operational Planning” (pp. 138–161)

 

Review as needed.

Sare, M., & Ogilvie, L. (2010). Strategic planning for nurses: Change management in health care.Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.

Chapter 7, “The Three Key Elements of the Strategic Planning Process: A Vision That Guides Nursing’s Future Action” (pp. 117–143)

 

Review as needed, focusing on the information about goals and objectives.

Kramer, M., Schmalenberg, C., & Maguire, P. (2010). Nine structures and leadership practices essential for a magnetic (healthy) work environment. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 34(1), 4–17.

Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.

 

The authors discuss the clinical environment of nursing and the leadership practices needed to promote quality patient care outcomes.

  • attachment 

    rubric_detail_-_discussion_rubic.pdf

    6/1/2017 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

    https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs­deep­links­BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16279233_1&rubric_id=_111208_1 1/4

    OutstandingPerformance Excellent Performance

    Competent Performance

    Room for Improvement

    Poor Performance

    Content­Main Posting

    30 (30%) ­ 30 (30%)

    ­Main posting addresses all criteria with 75% of post exceptional depth and breadth supported by credible references.

    27 (27%) ­ 29 (29%)

    ­Main posting addresses all criteria with 75% of post exceptional depth and breadth supported by credible references.

    24 (24%) ­ 26 (26%) NUR6241: Strategic Planning In Healthcare Organizations

    ­Main posting meets expectations. All criteria are addressed with 50% containing good breadth and depth.

    21 (21%) ­ 23 (23%)

    ­Main posting addresses most of the criteria. One to two criterion are not addressed or superficially addressed.

    0 (0%) ­ 20 (20%)

    ­Main posting does not address all of criteria, superficially addresses criteria. Two or more criteria are not addressed.

    Course Requirements and Attendance

    20 (20%) ­ 20 (20%)

    ­Responds to two colleagues’ with posts that are reflective, are justified with credible sources, and ask questions that extend the Discussion.

    18 (18%) ­ 19 (19%)

    ­Responds to two colleagues’ with posts that are reflective, are justified with credible sources, and ask questions that extend the Discussion.

    16 (16%) ­ 17 (17%)

    ­Responds to a minimum of two colleagues’ posts, are reflective, and ask questions that extend the Discussion. One post is justified by a credible source.

    14 (14%) ­ 15 (15%)

    ­Responds to less than two colleagues’ posts. Posts are on topic, may have some depth, or questions. May extend the Discussion. No credible sources are cited.

    0 (0%) ­ 13 (13%)

    ­Responds to less than two colleagues’ posts. Posts may not be on topic, lack depth, do not pose questions that extend the Discussion.

    Rubric Detail  Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.

    Name: NURS_6241_Discussion_Rubric Exit

    Grid View List View

     

     

    6/1/2017 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

    https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs­deep­links­BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16279233_1&rubric_id=_111208_1 2/4

    OutstandingPerformance Excellent Performance

    Competent Performance

    Room for Improvement

    Poor Performance

    Scholarly Writing Quality

    30 (30%) ­ 30 (30%)

    ­The main posting clearly addresses the Discussion criteria and is written concisely. The main posting is cited with more than two credible references that adhere to the correct format per the APA Manual 6th Edition. No spelling or grammatical errors. ***The use of scholarly sources or real life experiences needs to be included to deepen the Discussion and earn points in reply to fellow students.

    ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED SOLUTION PAPERS

    27 (27%) ­ 29 (29%)

    ­The main posting clearly addresses the Discussion criteria and is written concisely. The main posting is cited with more than two credible references that adhere to the correct format per the APA Manual 6th Edition. No spelling or grammatical errors.

    24 (24%) ­ 26 (26%)

    ­The main posting clearly addresses the Discussion criteria and is written concisely. The main posting is cited with a minimum of two current credible references that adhere to the correct format per the APA Manual 6th Edition. Contains one to two spelling or grammatical errors.

    21 (21%) ­ 23 (23%)

    ­The main posting is not clearly addressing the Discussion criteria and is not written concisely. The main posting is cited with less than two credible references that may lack credibility and/or do not adhere to the correct format per the APA Manual 6th Edition. Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

    0 (0%) ­ 20 (20%)

    ­The main posting is disorganized and has one reference that may lack credibility and does not adhere to the correct format per the APA Manual 6th Edition or has zero credible references. Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

     

     

    6/1/2017 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

    https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs­deep­links­BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16279233_1&rubric_id=_111208_1 3/4

    OutstandingPerformance Excellent Performance

    Competent Performance

    Room for Improvement

    Poor Performance

    Professional  Communication Effectiveness

    20 (20%) ­ 20 (20%)

    ­ Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues and response to faculty questions are answered if posed.

    ­Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas effectively written in Standard Edited English.

    ­Responses posted in the Discussion demonstrate effective professional communication through deep reflective discussion which leads to an exchange of ideas and focus on the weekly Discussion topic.

    18 (18%) ­ 19 (19%)

    ­ Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

    ­Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas effectively written in Standard Edited English.

    ­Responses posted in the Discussion demonstrate effective professional communication through deep reflective discussion which leads to an exchange of ideas and focus on the weekly Discussion topic.

    ­Responses are cited with at least one credible reference per post and a probing question that extends the Discussion. Adheres to the correct format per the APA Manual 6th Edition. No spelling or grammatical errors. NUR6241: Strategic Planning In Healthcare Organizations

    16 (16%) ­ 17 (17%)

    ­ Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

    ­Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas effectively written in Standard Edited English.

    ­Responses posted in the Discussion demonstrate effective professional communication through deep reflective discussion which leads to an exchange of ideas and focus on the weekly Discussion topic.

    ­Responses are cited with at least one credible and/or contain probing questions that extends the Discussion. Adheres to the correct format per the APA Manual 6th Edition. May have one to two spelling or grammatical errors.

    14 (14%) ­ 15 (15%)

    ­ Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

    ­Provides opinions that may not be concise or ideas not effectively written in Standard Edited English.

    ­Responses posted in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication that does not extend the Discussion, leads to an exchange of ideas and/or not focused on the weekly Discussion topic.

    ­Responses are not cited and/or do not contain a probing question. May not adhere to the correct format per the APA Manual 6th Edition. May have more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

    0 (0%) ­ 13 (13%)

    ­ Communication may lack professional tone or be disrespectful to colleagues.

    ­Provides opinions that may not be concise or ideas not effectively written in Standard Edited English.

    ­Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective professional communication through discussion that does not extend the Discussion, do not lead to an exchange of ideas and/or not focused on the weekly Discussion topic.

    ­Responses are not cited and do not contain a probing question. May not adhere to the correct format per the APA Manual 6th Edition. May have multiple spelling or grammatical errors.

    Timely Submission

    0 (0%) ­ 0 (0%) All criteria met: ­Initial post submitted on time.  ­Response to two peer initial posts.  ­Response on 3 separate days.

    ­5 (­5%) ­ 0 (0%)

    5 points deducted for responding to less than two peers or 5 points deducted for responding less than three days.

    ­10 (­10%) ­ ­5 (­5%)

    5 points deducted for responding to less than two peers and 5 points deducted for responding less than three days.

    ­10 (­10%) ­ ­10 (­10%)

    10 points deducted for Initial post submitted late.

    ­20 (­20%) ­ ­15 (­15%)

    Initial post submitted late and 5 points deducted for responding to less than two peers and/ or 5 points deducted for responding less than three days.

    Total Points: 100

     

     

    6/1/2017 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

    https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs­deep­links­BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16279233_1&rubric_id=_111208_1 4/4

    Total Points: 100

    Name: NURS_6241_Discussion_Rubric

write a paragraph responding to the discussion bellow

write a paragraph responding to the discussion bellow

Research Ethics and Research Process Components: Problem, Question and Literature Review Introduction Nursing

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

research is important because it generates and refines knowledge, but at the same time must be ethical in its development and implementation. Much of the research done in nursing requires human subjects, so the protection of human subjects’ rights must be maintained. In the past 40 years, the ethical implications of using human subjects have been examined with increasing frequency, primarily because of the medical experiments performed by the Nazis during World War II. These experiments influenced the formation of ethical codes and regulations that the nurse researcher must follow. As a result, it is important that nurse researchers know how to conduct ethical research. (Burns & Grove, 2001). Ethics Ethics simply means learning what is right and wrong, then doing what is right. It may sound simple, but it is not always straightforward. Core ethical values include such things as respect, honesty, fairness, responsibility, care, and citizenship. These same values apply to the field of research. Cooper and Schindler (2003) state that ethics are standards or norms, which guide moral behavior. Chapter 4 in the textbook (Burns & Grove, 2001) clearly describes the importance of ethics in research. Research in nursing always includes human subjects, and therefore it is critical that a nurse understands how the rights of the research participants are protected. Certain vulnerable populations, such as infants, children, and the elderly are at risk for potential harm due to research interventions. Ethical Dilemmas There are often situations in which nurses are placed in a position that may create an ethical dilemma. Such dilemmas arise when the researcher is conducting a study to advance knowledge, but through the process may produce physical, mental, emotional, or spiritual discomfort. All people have certain rights when participating in research. They are: • The right to protection from harm and discomfort • The right to protection from exploitation • The right to self-determination • The right to full disclosure • The right to fair treatment • The right to privacy Informed consent is critical to safeguard a person’s right. A written consent form should always include the purpose of the study, specific expectations for the participant, how much time will be involved, voluntary participation, and any potential risks associated with participation. Research Purpose The research purpose is the statement of why the study is being undertaken. The purpose statement may be explicit or implicit but should be stated objectively. The research purpose is more specific than the research problem and is generated by way of deductive reasoning. The research purpose communicates the aim or goal of the study. In addition, the major variables to be studied, along with the population and setting, are identified in the research purpose (Cooper & Schindler, 2003). As the research purpose becomes clearer, the researcher must determine the feasibility of the study by examining the commitment required in time and money, as well as expertise required, subject availability, and any ethical considerations. An example of a clinical research purpose that might be deemed feasible is to determine if a relationship exists between the extent of participation in selected behaviors that may be detrimental to health and the propensity to take risks. Review of Literature The purpose for the review of literature is to gain a broad understanding of the available information related to the research problem. Relevant literature is examined, and provides credibility to the study being pursued. There are three steps to the review of literature process: locating relevant sources, critiquing the sources, and generating the written report of the resulting knowledge. Literature can be located through electronic literature searches of electronic databases, such as CINAHL, MEDLINE, Science Direct, and HealthSTAR, and print resources such as those found in libraries. The literature review section should be written in an organized manner, beginning with the introduction, leading to the presentation of empirical and theoretical sources, and ending with the summary of relevant ideas. The information gained through the review of literature is logically organized and presented in the review-of-literature section of the report (Cooper & Schindler, 2003). Research Question Once the problem has been identified, the literature review completed, and the conceptual framework chosen, the research question needs to be formulated. The question may either be in the form of a statement, a question, or a hypothesis. The research question must be succinct, clear, and it must answer the question being studied. Formulating the research question may be one of the most difficult steps of the research process. Usually, the initial dilemma is very broad, and must be narrowed to be reasonably studied. A research question should be based on facts, which will lead to the formulation of investigative questions. The question should be theoretical, practical, and feasible (Cooper & Schindler, 2003). Hypothesis The hypothesis is a prediction of the researcher’s expected findings of the research study. The hypothesis includes the variables to be studied and their relationships, the population to be studied, and the type of research to be conducted. The hypothesis also directs the measurement of variables, the selection of the design, and the interpretation of the findings. The findings of the study either indicate acceptance or non-acceptance of the hypothesis (Cooper & Schindler, 2003). Qualitative Research As with quantitative research, the goals of qualitative research are to describe, explain, predict, and control. These goals are not established by causality but seek to gain insight by discovering the meaning associated with a given experience. These insights can be used to improve nursing care. Although many researchers are doing qualitative studies, they have the following disadvantages (Polit & Beck, 2010, p. 77-80): • They are labor intensive. • Data collected over a long period of time may create data overload. • There is a potential for researcher bias. • There is generally a small sampling. • It is harder to generalize findings. • Quality and credibility of conclusions can come into question. • There can be issues with reliability and validity. Research Question and Problem Similar to a quantitative study, a qualitative study must establish a dilemma or research problem. A qualitative study has no hypotheses, and the research question is usually very broad. Questions will evolve as the study progresses. Therefore, the researcher looks for data to form impressions; this type of research is not measurable (Polit & Beck, 2010, p. 77). Sampling The subjects in a qualitative study are called participants. A qualitative research method generally does not require a certain number of participants or a random sampling. They are not chosen randomly as in a quantitative study. Participants are selected by the researcher because they meet the criteria necessary for the information needed. The sampling is usually small, with 6-12 participants being a typical sample size for the study. The researcher will stop the collection of data, not with respect to the number of participants, but because the researcher has stopped learning new information. They have gained the necessary information for the study. Data Collection Methods Qualitative research requires a simple data collection method because the complexity of the research is in the data itself. If the researcher is too complex in his or her method, the reaction between the complex data and the complex method could be disastrous. Common data collection methods include observation, interviewing, and examining historical documents or written texts. A qualitative inquiry or interview should include understandable, and rather simple, questions. Qualitative research should start with asking simple questions that evolve into complex answers. Using qualitative interviews allows the researcher to gather detailed, rich information. When doing interviews, it is necessary to reach the saturation level, which means the information is repeated. Robson (2002) offers some helpful advice when doing an interview for a qualitative study. The interviewer should encourage the participants to talk freely. This can be encouraged in the following ways: Interviewer must listen more often than they speak, and should not interject their personal opinions. Questions should be delivered in a clear, concise, and nonthreatening way. Interviewers must not put participants on the defensive nor try to confuse them. The researcher should not lead the participant in answering the questions a certain way, or in a way the researcher wants the questions answered. References Burns, N., & Grove, S. (2001). The practice of nursing research: Conduct, critique, and Utilization (4th ed.). Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders. Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. S. (2003). Business research methods (8th ed.). Boston: McGrawHill Irwin. Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2010). Essentials of nursing research: Methods, appraisal, and utilization (7th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott.
Purchase answer to see full attachment

Respond with a paragraph, add citations and references

Respond with a paragraph, add citations and references

The three types of qualitative research are phenomenological, grounded theory, and ethnographic research. What are the differences and similarities between two of the three types of studies?

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations

Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations

Research Critique Guidelines To write a critical appraisal that demonstrates comprehension of the research study

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

conducted, address each component below for qualitative study in the Topic 2 assignment and the quantitative study in the Topic 3 assignment. Successful completion of this assignment requires that you provide a rationale, include examples, or reference content from the study in your responses. Qualitative Study Background of Study: • Identify the clinical problem and research problem that led to the study. What was not known about the clinical problem that, if understood, could be used to improve health care delivery or patient outcomes? This gap in knowledge is the research problem. • How did the author establish the significance of the study? In other words, why should the reader care about this study? Look for statements about human suffering, costs of treatment, or the number of people affected by the clinical problem. • Identify the purpose of the study. An author may clearly state the purpose of the study or may describe the purpose as the study goals, objectives, or aims. • List research questions that the study was designed to answer. If the author does not explicitly provide the questions, attempt to infer the questions from the answers. • Were the purpose and research questions related to the problem? Method of Study: • Were qualitative methods appropriate to answer the research questions? • Did the author identify a specific perspective from which the study was developed? If so, what was it? • Did the author cite quantitative and qualitative studies relevant to the focus of the study? What other types of literature did the author include? • Are the references current? For qualitative studies, the author may have included studies older than the 5-year limit typically used for quantitative studies. Findings of older qualitative studies may be relevant to a qualitative study. • Did the author evaluate or indicate the weaknesses of the available studies? • Did the literature review include adequate information to build a logical argument? • When a researcher uses the grounded theory method of qualitative inquiry, the researcher may develop a framework or diagram as part of the findings of the study. Was a framework developed from the study findings? © 2016. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved. Results of Study • What were the study findings? • What are the implications to nursing? • Explain how the findings contribute to nursing knowledge/science. Would this impact practice, education, administration, or all areas of nursing? Ethical Considerations • Was the study approved by an Institutional Review Board? • Was patient privacy protected? • Were there ethical considerations regarding the treatment or lack of? Conclusion • Emphasize the importance and congruity of the thesis statement. • Provide a logical wrap-up to bring the appraisal to completion and to leave a lasting impression and take-away points useful in nursing practice. • Incorporate a critical appraisal and a brief analysis of the utility and applicability of the findings to nursing practice. • Integrate a summary of the knowledge learned. 2 Quantitative Study Background of Study: • Identify the clinical problem and research problem that led to the study. What was not known about the clinical problem that, if understood, could be used to improve health care delivery or patient outcomes? This gap in knowledge is the research problem. • How did the author establish the significance of the study? In other words, why should the reader care about this study? Look for statements about human suffering, costs of treatment, or the number of people affected by the clinical problem. • Identify the purpose of the study. An author may clearly state the purpose of the study or may describe the purpose as the study goals, objectives, or aims. • List research questions that the study was designed to answer. If the author does not explicitly provide the questions, attempt to infer the questions from the answers. • Were the purpose and research questions related to the problem? Methods of Study • Identify the benefits and risks of participation addressed by the authors. Were there benefits or risks the authors do not identify? • Was informed consent obtained from the subjects or participants? • Did it seem that the subjects participated voluntarily in the study? • Was institutional review board approval obtained from the agency in which the study was conducted? • Are the major variables (independent and dependent variables) identified and defined? What were these variables? • How were data collected in this study? • What rationale did the author provide for using this data collection method? • Identify the time period for data collection of the study. • Describe the sequence of data collection events for a participant. • Describe the data management and analysis methods used in the study. • Did the author discuss how the rigor of the process was assured? For example, does the author describe maintaining a paper trail of critical decisions that were made during the analysis of the data? Was statistical software used to ensure accuracy of the analysis? • What measures were used to minimize the effects of researcher bias (their experiences and perspectives)? For example, did two researchers independently analyze the data and compare their analyses? Results of Study • What is the researcher’s interpretation of findings? 3 • Are the findings valid or an accurate reflection of reality? Do you have confidence in the findings? • What limitations of the study were identified by researchers? • Was there a coherent logic to the presentation of findings? • What implications do the findings have for nursing practice? For example, can the findings of the study be applied to general nursing practice, to a specific population, or to a specific area of nursing? • What suggestions are made for further studies? Ethical Considerations • Was the study approved by an Institutional Review Board? • Was patient privacy protected? • Were there ethical considerations regarding the treatment or lack of? Conclusion • Emphasize the importance and congruity of the thesis statement. • Provide a logical wrap-up to bring the appraisal to completion and to leave a lasting impression and take-away points useful in nursing practice. • Incorporate a critical appraisal and a brief analysis of the utility and applicability of the findings to nursing practice. • Integrate a summary of the knowledge learned. Reference Burns, N., & Grove, S. (2011). Understanding nursing research (5th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier. 4
Purchase answer to see full attachment

Need a 11 slide powerpoint presentation on Myocardial Infractions

Need a 11 slide powerpoint presentation on Myocardial Infractions

GRADE: Pathophysiology Presentation Fall 2018 Directions: The following assignment is worth 5%. Below you

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

will find areas of discussion to be included in power point presentation: Pathophysiology of the disease, diagnostic tests, pharmacological interventions, development of priority diagnosis, specific considerations for vulnerable populations and determinate factors, economic impact and prevalence, and development of a test question and rationale. Follow the rubric for the Case Study presentation and address the topic headings in a systematic way. APA format for references. The Power Point Presentation will be 8-10 slides, not including the title page and references. Clearly address pathophysiology of disease process 15 Citation needed Discuss and Identify diagnostic tests 15 Citation needed Identify pharmacological interventions 15 Identify treatment interventions Citation needed Develop three Nursing Diagnosis NANDA (Include one actual, one risk for and one wellness) Non-Nursing students can skip this component. The 15 points will be included in your description of the pathophysiology 15 Specific considerations for treatment in vulnerable groups such as: Older adults Pediatric (look at determinant factors such as socioeconomic, environmental, and cultural) Citation Needed 10 1 GRADE: Pathophysiology Presentation Fall 2018 Discuss the economic impact and the prevalence in society. 10 Write a multiple choice test question with four possible choices 1-4 10 AND Supply the appropriate rationale. Citation needed Power Point Presentation: • Effective use of figures and tables to present data • Visual Appeal • Neat and organized 10 TOTAL 100 Comments: 2
Purchase answer to see full attachment

Respond with a paragraph and citations and references .

Respond with a paragraph and citations and references .

Describe how the nursing profession is viewed by the general public. Discuss factors that influence the public’s perception of nursing? Describe ways to educate the general public on the professional nurse’s role and scope of nursing within a changing health care system.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

group discussion 350-450 words

group discussion 350-450 words

Prompt 1 (250-300words)

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

What resources do you use to determine safety and effectiveness of complementary and alternative medicine?

Prompt 2 (350-450 words)

Discuss some of the psychophysiological aspects of stress. Which evidence-based stress management interventions do you apply to clinical practice? How effective are they?