Please respond to the following post.

/in /by

Please respond to the following post.

Please respond to the following post with a long paragraph, with a response to the following paragraph with your opinion, add citations and references.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

The role of a nurse is to provide holistic, competent care to the patients and families that we are caring for. My definition of advocacy is speaking up for our patients, families, and ourselves to provide the most optimal safe care. Nurses are advocates for our patients every day. We are their voice when they can’t speak or even when they can speak. We listen to their concerns and questions and we get the answers if we can’t answer them. We advocate for their patient rights, culture, religion, etc. Being an advocate is part of being a great nurse. I take care of a lot of ventilated and sedated patients in the ICU, they don’t have a voice during this time so I have to be their voice. One situation that I remember very well was a post C-Section that came into the Surgical ICU post op that required multiple transfusions throughout the day. She was intubated and sedated and her blood pressure wasn’t stable which required vasopressors. She had delivered a healthy baby with no complications and the baby was placed in the nursery during all of this. This was her first child. As an advocate for her, I pulled in the medical team at her bedside and recommended that once she stabilized if we could get the nursery and the father to bring the baby into the SICU so she could touch and hear the baby. What I was asking and advocating for was also against SICU policy. The team thought it was an excellent idea even though it was against policy but this was in the patients and families benefit. In my mind, that’s all a mother longs to do is hold and touch their newborn baby. This patient didn’t get that opportunity due to her circumstances. Later that evening, the nursery brought the baby in and we placed the baby in her arms. We told the mother that her baby was in her arms and that her husband was there as well. The next day the patient was taken off the ventilator and was doing much better. I feel that me advocating for her and her baby helped her heal. If I didn’t advocate for her she would have never been able to touch her baby when she probably needed it the most.

Population presentation

/in /by

Population presentation

By the end of this week (October 13, 2018, @ 11:59 PM) you should choose from the list of cultural

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

and sociocultural groups below and prepare a PowerPoint presentation that is due at the end of week 8. Preparation for the presentation will include synthesizing the information from readings, scientific literature, Internet resources and other sources.

This presentation should address the following; history, values, and worldview, language and communication patterns, art and other expressive forms, norms and rules, lifestyle characteristics, relationship patterns, rituals, the degree of assimilation or marginalization from mainstream society, and health behavior and practices.

In addition to describing these characteristics, the presentation must include;

a) a comparative and contrast analysis of common characteristics and distinguishing traits between the groups

b) a discussion of differential approaches needed by health care professionals

This is the only special assignment in this course and as I stated above it is due at the end of week 8. The assignment will be posted in Turnitin for grading and verify originality and in the discussion tab of the blackboard for your peers to view and comment. The assignment must be presented in an APA format, PowerPoint, Arial 12 font attached to the forum in the assignment tab and discussion board title “Population presentation”. A rubric will be use

Cystic Fibrosis

/in /by

Cystic Fibrosis

NR283 Pathophysiology RUA: Pathophysiological Processes Guidelines Purpose This project is an in depth

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

investigation of a health condition. It will allow for the expansion of knowledge and the ability to generalize larger concepts to a variety of health conditions. Course outcomes: This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes: 1. Explain the pathophysiologic processes of select health conditions. (PO 1) 2. Predict clinical manifestations and complications of select disease processes. (PO 1, 8) 3. Correlate lifestyle, environmental, and other influences with changes in levels of wellness. (PO 1, 7) Due date: Your faculty member will inform you when this assignment is due. The Late Assignment Policy applies to this assignment. Total points possible: 100 points Preparing the assignment Follow these guidelines when completing this assignment. Speak with your faculty member if you have questions. 1) Select a disease process that interests you. 2) Obtain approval of the selected disease process from the course faculty. a. Faculty will share how to submit your topic choice for approval. 3) Write a 2‐3 page paper (excluding title and reference pages). 4) Include the following sections about the selected disease process (detailed criteria listed below and in the Grading Rubric). a. Introduction of disease ‐ 20 points/20% • One paragraph (approximately 200 words) • Includes disease description • Includes epidemiology of disease b. Etiology and risk factors ‐ 20 points/20% • Common causes of the disease or condition • Risk factors for the disease or condition • Impact of age • Prevalence based on gender, • Influence of environment • Genetic basis of disease • Lifestyle influences • All information supported by current literature c. Pathophysiological processes ‐ 20 points/20% • Describes changes occurring at the cellular, tissue, and/or organ level that contribute to the disease process. • Describes adaptation of the cells and body in response to the disease. • Relates disease processes to manifested signs and symptoms. d. Clinical manifestations and complications ‐ 20 points/20% • Describes the physical signs and symptoms that are important in considering the presence of the disease. • Identifies signs that contribute to diagnosis of the condition • Identifies symptoms that contribute to diagnosis of the condition. • Identifies complications of the disease. • Discusses the implications to the patient when complications are left untreated. e. Diagnostics ‐ 10 points/10% • Includes list of common laboratory and diagnostic tests used to determine the presence of the disease.1 NR283 Pathophysiological Processes Guidelines V4.docx Revised: 05/2018 11 NR283 Pathophysiology RUA: Pathophysiological Processes Guidelines f. • Discusses the significance of test findings in relation to the disease process. APA Style and Organization ‐ 10 points/10% • References are submitted with assignment. • Uses appropriate APA format (6th ed.) and is free of errors. • Grammar and mechanics are free of errors. • Paper is 2‐3 pages, excluding title and reference pages • At least two (2) scholarly, primary sources from the last 5 years, excluding the textbook, are provided For writing assistance (APA, formatting, or grammar) visit the Citation and Writing Assistance: Writing Papers at CU page in the online library. 2 NR283 Pathophysiological Processes Guidelines V4.docx Revised: 05/2018 21 NR283 Pathophysiology RUA: Pathophysiological Processes Guidelines Grading Rubric Criteria are met when the student’s application of knowledge within the paper demonstrates achievement of the outcomes for this assignment. Assignment Section and Required Criteria (Points possible/% of total points available) Introduction of Disease (20 points/20%) Required criteria 1. One (approximately 200 words) paragraph 2. Includes disease description 3. Includes epidemiology of disease Etiology and Risk Factors (20 points/20%) Required criteria 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Common causes of the disease or condition Risk factors for the disease or condition Impact of age Prevalence based on gender Influence of environment Genetic basis of disease Lifestyle influences All information supported by current literature Pathophysiological Processes (20 points/20%) Required criteria 1. Describes changes occurring at the cellular, tissue, and/or organ level that contribute to the disease process. 2. Describes adaptation of the cells and body in response to the disease. 3. Relates disease processes to manifested signs and symptoms. NR283 Pathophysiological Processes Guidelines V4.docx Highest Level of Performance High Level of Performance Satisfactory Level of Performance Unsatisfactory Level of Performance Section not present in paper 20 points 18 points 16 points 7 points 0 points Includes no fewer than 3 requirements for section. Includes no fewer than 2 requirements for section. Includes no less than 1 requirement for section. 20 points 18 points 16 points 7 points Includes no fewer than 8 requirements for section. Includes no fewer than 7 requirements for section. Includes no fewer than 6 requirements for section. Includes 5 or fewer requirements for section. 20 points 18 points 16 points 7 points Includes no fewer than 3 requirements for section. Includes no fewer than 2 requirements for section. Present, yet includes no required criteria. Includes no less than Section present, yet 1 requirements for includes no required section. criteria. No requirements for this section presented. 0 points No requirements for this section presented. 0 points No requirements for this section presented. Revised: 05/2018 31 NR283 Pathophysiology RUA: Pathophysiological Processes Guidelines Clinical Manifestations & Complications (20 points/20%) Required criteria Describes the physical signs and symptoms that are important in considering the presence of the disease. 1. Identifies signs that contribute to diagnosis of the condition 2. Identifies symptoms that contribute to diagnosis of the condition. 3. Identifies complications of the disease. 4. Discusses the implications to the patient when complications are left untreated. 20 points 18 points 16 points Includes no fewer than 4 requirements for section. Includes no fewer than 3 requirements for section. Includes no fewer than 2 requirements for section. Diagnostics (10 points/10%) 10 points Includes 1 or less requirement for section. 1. Includes list of common laboratory and diagnostic tests used to determine the presence of the disease. 2. Discusses the significance of test findings in relation to the disease process. APA Style and Organization (10 points/10%) Required criteria 1. References are submitted with assignment. 2. Uses appropriate APA format (6th ed.) and is free of errors. 3. Grammar and mechanics are free of errors. 4. Paper is 2‐3 pages, excluding title and reference pages 5. At least two (2) scholarly, primary sources from the last 5 years, excluding the textbook, are provided Includes 1 or fewer requirements for section. 4 points Includes no fewer than 2 requirements for section. Required criteria 7 points 10 points 9 points 8 points Includes no fewer than 5 requirements for section. Includes no fewer than 4 requirements for section. Includes no fewer than 3 requirements for section. 4 points Includes 1‐2 requirements for section. 0 points No requirements for this section presented. 0 points No requirements for this section presented. 0 points No requirements for this section presented. Total Points Possible = 100 points NR283 Pathophysiological Processes Guidelines V4.docx Revised: 05/2018 41
Purchase answer to see full attachment

Write a research Article critique

/in /by

Write a research Article critique

the tittle and references are not included in the 5 pages

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

A critique is a method of displaying a logical and organized analysis of a written or oral piece. Critique can provide the readers with both positive and negative outcomes depending on the author. The purpose of this assignment is for the student to perform a critique on a research article that deals with today’s health issues. In this paper the student must be diligent at what the author are claiming, taking into account the research methods being utilized and look for pros and cons of the researcher’s outcomes.

The assignment must be a minimal of five pages, excluding title page and references. The assignment must be strictly following APA guidelines, points will be deducted if otherwise. Do not use first person throughout the paper until the section called evaluate the paper.It will be divided in the following manner:

Title page: Give the name of the article, the authors name(s) and your name. Following APA

1 attachments

Critique a Research Article

/in /by

Critique a Research Article

Library Assignment Critique a Research Article A critique is a method of displaying a logical and organized analysis

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

of a written or oral piece. Critique can provide the readers with both positive and negative outcomes depending on the author. The purpose of this assignment is for the student to perform a critique on a research article that deals with today’s health issues. In this paper the student must be diligent at what the author are claiming, taking into account the research methods being utilized and look for pros and cons of the researcher’s outcomes. The assignment must be a minimal of five pages, excluding title page and references. The assignment must be strictly following APA guidelines, points will be deducted if otherwise. Do not use first person throughout the paper until the section called evaluate the paper. It will be divided in the following manner: Title page: Give the name of the article, the authors name(s) and your name. Following APA Introduction: • • Provide an overview of the author’s research problem, research questions and main point including how the author supports his or her point. Explain what the author initial objectives (hypothesis) and results including the process he or she used to arrive at such conclusion. Evaluate the Research Methods: in paragraph form answer the following: • Does the author provide a literature review? • Is the research current and relevant to today existing health issues? • Describe the research type utilized?– experimental, non-experimental, quasi experimental, etc. • Evaluate the sample (size, composition, or in the way the sample was selected in relation to the purpose of the study? Was the sample appropriate for the research or was it bias? • How practical does this work seem to you? How does the author suggest research results could be applied and how do you believe they could be applied? • Could the study have been improved in your opinion? If so provide how you think it could have improved. • Is the writing in the article clear straightforward? • Can further research be conducted on this subject? Explain Conclusion: In your conclusion, try to synthesize the pieces of your critique to emphasize your own main points about the author’s work, relating the researcher’s work to your own knowledge or to topics being discussed in your course. Reference Page: APA style, see rubric below See Rubric Below for assignment Title Page: Title of article, journal information and your name and date Abstract: Brief summary of article (1-2 paragraphs) The Problem: (2 or 3 paragraphs) 1 point 1 points 3 points Is the problem clearly stated? Is the problem practically important? What is the purpose of the study? What is the hypothesis? Are the key terms defined? Review of Literature: (1 -2 paragraphs) 2 points Are the cited sources pertinent to the study? Is the review too broad or too narrow? Are the references recent? Is there any evidence of bias? Design and Procedures: (3-4 paragraphs) 3 points What research methodology was used? Was it a replica study or an original study? What measurement tools were used? How were the procedures structures? Was a pilot study conducted? What are the variables? How was sampling performed? Data analysis and Presentation: (1 – 2 paragraphs) 2 points How was data analyzed? Did findings support the hypothesis and purpose? Were weaknesses and problems discussed? Conclusions and Implications: (2-3 paragraphs) Are the conclusions of the study related to the original purpose? Were the implications discussed? Whom the results and conclusions will affect? What recommendations were made at the conclusion? 3 points Your score What is your overall assessment of the study and the article? Total 15 points (100%) Grade Library Assignment Critique a Research Article A critique is a method of displaying a logical and organized analysis of a written or oral piece. Critique can provide the readers with both positive and negative outcomes depending on the author. The purpose of this assignment is for the student to perform a critique on a research article that deals with today’s health issues. In this paper the student must be diligent at what the author are claiming, taking into account the research methods being utilized and look for pros and cons of the researcher’s outcomes. The assignment must be a minimal of five pages, excluding title page and references. The assignment must be strictly following APA guidelines, points will be deducted if otherwise. Do not use first person throughout the paper until the section called evaluate the paper. It will be divided in the following manner: Title page: Give the name of the article, the authors name(s) and your name. Following APA Introduction: • • Provide an overview of the author’s research problem, research questions and main point including how the author supports his or her point. Explain what the author initial objectives (hypothesis) and results including the process he or she used to arrive at such conclusion. Evaluate the Research Methods: in paragraph form answer the following: • Does the author provide a literature review? • Is the research current and relevant to today existing health issues? • Describe the research type utilized?– experimental, non-experimental, quasi experimental, etc. • Evaluate the sample (size, composition, or in the way the sample was selected in relation to the purpose of the study? Was the sample appropriate for the research or was it bias? • How practical does this work seem to you? How does the author suggest research results could be applied and how do you believe they could be applied? • Could the study have been improved in your opinion? If so provide how you think it could have improved. • Is the writing in the article clear straightforward? • Can further research be conducted on this subject? Explain Conclusion: In your conclusion, try to synthesize the pieces of your critique to emphasize your own main points about the author’s work, relating the researcher’s work to your own knowledge or to topics being discussed in your course. Reference Page: APA style, see rubric below See Rubric Below for assignment Title Page: Title of article, journal information and your name and date Abstract: Brief summary of article (1-2 paragraphs) The Problem: (2 or 3 paragraphs) 1 point 1 points 3 points Is the problem clearly stated? Is the problem practically important? What is the purpose of the study? What is the hypothesis? Are the key terms defined? Review of Literature: (1 -2 paragraphs) 2 points Are the cited sources pertinent to the study? Is the review too broad or too narrow? Are the references recent? Is there any evidence of bias? Design and Procedures: (3-4 paragraphs) 3 points What research methodology was used? Was it a replica study or an original study? What measurement tools were used? How were the procedures structures? Was a pilot study conducted? What are the variables? How was sampling performed? Data analysis and Presentation: (1 – 2 paragraphs) 2 points How was data analyzed? Did findings support the hypothesis and purpose? Were weaknesses and problems discussed? Conclusions and Implications: (2-3 paragraphs) Are the conclusions of the study related to the original purpose? Were the implications discussed? Whom the results and conclusions will affect? What recommendations were made at the conclusion? 3 points Your score What is your overall assessment of the study and the article? Total 15 points (100%) Grade
Purchase answer to see full attachment

Topic 3 DQ 2

/in /by

Topic 3 DQ 2

Please Respond to the following post with a paragraph, add citations and references.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

Each alpha level is dependent on the circumstances that surround a particular study. In statistical hypothesis testing, a type I error is the rejection of a true null hypothesis (also known as a “false positive” finding), while a type II error is failing to reject a false null hypothesis (also known as a “false negative” finding). More simply stated, a type I error is to falsely infer the existence of something that is not there, while a type II error is to falsely infer the absence of something that is (“Type I and type II errors,” 2018). For example, if doing a test for cancer and that test would determine if a cancerous organ should be removed, then you want to set the alpha level very stringent at 0.01. You do not want to remove an organ if it is cancer free. On the other hand, if you set the alpha level too stringent and you determine that the organ does not have cancer, when in fact it does then the patient may die prematurely because you made a type II error, failure to detect a difference when one in fact does exist. This can make for a delicate balance.

Situations where you might raise the alpha to 0.1 can vary greatly. The obvious one is when the results of the study are not that critical. For example, when trying to see if a mood therapy has an effect, you might raise the alpha to find the effect even though this increases the chance of making a type I error. Certain studies may appear to have biased results because they could have raised their alpha to 0.25 to say their product is better, and the statistics will support that claim, however the chance of making a type I error is 25%! This is why it is important to know statistics to make decisions that are important to you.

Generally, the only reason to raise a type I error rate is if a limited sample size or if no money to conduct the study at the 0.05 level. Choosing between a type I error or a type II error is a tradeoff, the more stringent the type I error the greater the change for a type II error. The question then becomes which is the lesser of two evils. Is it better to say there is an effect when there wasn’t (type I error) or is it better to say there was no effect when there was (type II error)? There can be other factors involved, but basically that is what it comes down to.

References

Type I and type II errors. (2018). In Wikipedia. Retrieved October 8, 2018, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_I_and_type_II_e…

Wk1 Case Study: Coagulation

/in /by

Wk1 Case Study: Coagulation

Required Resources

Read/review the following resources for this activity:

  • Textbook
  • Weekly Concepts
  • Minimum of 1 scholarly source

Scenario/Summary

Jessie was a typical 2-year-old who liked to try and spread his wings. He would run and fall throughout the house. On several occasions, with minor falls, a bruise would develop on his legs or arms. Jessie’s parent would often worry about being reported for child abuse because of the easy bruising that Jessie experienced.

At three, Jessie would complain that his ankles hurt. This was especially true after a hectic day of running and playing with other kids at the playground. Jessie’s parents wondered if he was simply trying to get attention. Which he usually did being an only child.

ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED SOLUTION PAPERS

When Jessie was four, he accidentally ran into a small tree, hitting his nose. The nose bled excessively. Jessie’s mother tried to stop the bleeding, first with paper towels, which Jessie soaked through quickly, and then with a cold washcloth. Nothing seemed to help. Nervous about the amount of blood that Jessie was losing, his parents rushed him to the emergency room. Wk1 Case Study: Coagulation

The emergency doctor ordered some blood work that included a Prothrombin Time (PT)and a Thromboplastin Time (PTT) test for clotting deficiencies. The site of the venipuncture for the blood draw, also took some time to stop bleeding.

An hour after the blood draw, the physician returned to the ER room to discuss the test results. Jessie’s PT results were normal but his PTT results were abnormal with an extended clotting time. The PTT clotting time was much longer than normal indicating the Jessie may lack of or decreased levels of a clotting factor.

Deliverables

Answer the following questions and save your responses in a Microsoft Word document. Provide a scholarly resource in APA format to support your answers.

  1. Discuss which clotting factors the PT and PTT test evaluate and whether each test measures the intrinsic or the extrinsic pathways.
  2. Describe the common coagulation pathway.
  3. Based on Jessie’s test, which factor deficiency do you believe he has and why?
  4. Jessie’s clotting factor disease is seen more often in males. Please explain why.
  5. If both the PT and the PTT tests were abnormally long, which part of the coagulation pathway would be affected?

Submit your case study document to Turnitin. For more information on Turnitin view the following link: https://mychamberlain.sharepoint.com/sites/StudentResourceCenter/SitePages/Turnitin.aspx (Links to an external site.)

Required Software

Microsoft Office: Word

Grading

This activity will be graded based on the Case Study grading rubric. You can view the rubric below. Wk1 Case Study: Coagulation

Course Outcomes (CO): 1

Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders

/in /by

Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders

Controversy Associated with Dissociative Disorders

PLEASE FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS BELOW

FOUR REFERENCES

ZERO PLAGIARISM

The DSM-5 is a diagnostic tool. It has evolved over the decades, as have the classifications and criteria within its pages. It is used not just for diagnosis, however, but also for billing, access to services, and legal cases. Not all practitioners are in agreement with the content and structure of the DSM-5, and dissociative disorders are one such area. These disorders can be difficult to distinguish and diagnose. There is also controversy in the field over the legitimacy of certain dissociative disorders, such as dissociative identity disorder, which was formerly called multiple personality disorder. Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders

In this Assignment, you will examine the controversy surrounding dissociative disorders. You will also explore clinical, ethical, and legal considerations pertinent to working with patients with these disorders.

ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED SOLUTION PAPERS

To Prepare

  • Review this week’s Learning Resources on dissociative disorders.
  • Use the Walden Library to investigate the controversy regarding dissociative disorders. Locate at least three scholarly articles that you can use to support your Assignment.

The Assignment (2–3 pages)

  • Explain the controversy that surrounds dissociative disorders.
  • Explain your professional beliefs about dissociative disorders, supporting your rationale with at least three scholarly references from the literature.
  • Explain strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder.
  • Finally, explain ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that you need to bring to your practice and why they are important. Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders

Topic 3 DQ 2

/in /by

Topic 3 DQ 2

Please Respond to the following post with a paragraph, add citations and references.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

Each alpha level is dependent on the circumstances that surround a particular study. In statistical hypothesis testing, a type I error is the rejection of a true null hypothesis (also known as a “false positive” finding), while a type II error is failing to reject a false null hypothesis (also known as a “false negative” finding). More simply stated, a type I error is to falsely infer the existence of something that is not there, while a type II error is to falsely infer the absence of something that is (“Type I and type II errors,” 2018). For example, if doing a test for cancer and that test would determine if a cancerous organ should be removed, then you want to set the alpha level very stringent at 0.01. You do not want to remove an organ if it is cancer free. On the other hand, if you set the alpha level too stringent and you determine that the organ does not have cancer, when in fact it does then the patient may die prematurely because you made a type II error, failure to detect a difference when one in fact does exist. This can make for a delicate balance.

Situations where you might raise the alpha to 0.1 can vary greatly. The obvious one is when the results of the study are not that critical. For example, when trying to see if a mood therapy has an effect, you might raise the alpha to find the effect even though this increases the chance of making a type I error. Certain studies may appear to have biased results because they could have raised their alpha to 0.25 to say their product is better, and the statistics will support that claim, however the chance of making a type I error is 25%! This is why it is important to know statistics to make decisions that are important to you.

Generally, the only reason to raise a type I error rate is if a limited sample size or if no money to conduct the study at the 0.05 level. Choosing between a type I error or a type II error is a tradeoff, the more stringent the type I error the greater the change for a type II error. The question then becomes which is the lesser of two evils. Is it better to say there is an effect when there wasn’t (type I error) or is it better to say there was no effect when there was (type II error)? There can be other factors involved, but basically that is what it comes down to.

References

Type I and type II errors. (2018). In Wikipedia. Retrieved October 8, 2018, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_I_and_type_II_e…

Benchmark – Diversity In Healthcare Essay

/in /by

Benchmark – Diversity In Healthcare Essay

Diversity has a significant influence on health care. Studying transcultural health care helps health professionals understand different cultures in order to provide holistic and individualized health care. Review the Purnell Model for Cultural Competence, including the theory, framework and 12 domains. Write 750-1,000-word paper exploring the Purnell Model for Cultural Competence.

ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED SOLUTION PAPERS

 

Include the following:

Explain culturally sensitive care and its application within health care.
Explain the theory and organizational framework of the Purnell Model, and discuss its relevance to transcultural health care.
Describe Purnell’s 12 domains of culture, and assess how each of these domains plays an active role in the diversity of health care in your specific field.
Discuss how this model can be applied when working with different cultures in order to become a more culturally competent health care provider.
Cite at least three references, including the course textbook.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance. Benchmark – Diversity In Healthcare Essay