Case Report: What does the research say?
Case Report: What does the research say?
Details:
In this assignment, learners are required to write a case report. The report should demonstrate a depth and breadth of the knowledge and skills gained in the current course and potentially solve an identified real-world practice problem.
ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW
General Requirements:
Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:
Use at least two additional scholarly research sources published within the last 5 years. Provide citations and references for all sources used.
Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Directions:
Identify a particular real-world problem using a PICOT template that you have used in previous courses. Include the particular clinical setting and potential health/disease issue you will examine. Identify and fully describe the research that has taken place within the last 5 years.
Your case report must include the following:
Introduction with a problem statement.
Brief synthesized review.
Description of the case/situation/conditions.
Proposed solutions describing the validity and reliability of the research you have read.
Conclusion.
Apply Rubrics
Case Report: What Does the Research Say?
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less Than Satisfactory
74.00%
3
Satisfactory
79.00%
4
Good
87.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
10.0 %Introduction and Problem Statement
An introduction with problem statement is not present.
An introduction with problem statement is present but incomplete.
An introduction with problem statement is present but rendered at a perfunctory level.
An introduction with problem statement is present, clear, and thorough. Discussion is thorough and defines specific elements but not as complete as expected. Information presented is from scholarly but dated sources.
An introduction with problem statement is clearly present. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
10.0 %Brief Literature Review
A brief literature review is not present.
A brief literature review is present but incomplete.
A brief literature review is present but rendered at a perfunctory level.
A brief literature review is clearly present but not as complete as expected. Information presented is from scholarly but dated sources.
A brief literature review is clearly present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
10.0 %Description of the Case, Situation, or Conditions
A description of the case, situation, or conditions is not present.
A description of the case, situation, or conditions is present but incomplete.
A description of the case, situation, or conditions is present but rendered at a perfunctory level.
A description of the case, situation, or conditions is thorough and defines specific elements but not as complete as expected. Information presented is from scholarly but dated sources.
A description of the case, situation, or conditions is clearly present. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
10.0 %Detailed Explanation of the Synthesized Literature Findings
A detailed explanation of the synthesized literature findings is not present.
A detailed explanation of the synthesized literature findings is present but incomplete.
A detailed explanation of the synthesized literature findings is present but rendered at a perfunctory level.
A detailed explanation of the synthesized literature findings is thorough and defines specific elements but not as complete as expected. Information presented is from scholarly but dated sources.
A detailed explanation of the synthesized literature findings is clearly present. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
10.0 %Case Summary
A case summary is not present.
A case summary is present but incomplete.
A case summary is present but rendered at a perfunctory level.
A case summary is thorough and defines specific elements but not as complete as expected. Information presented is from scholarly but dated sources.
A case summary is clearly present. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
10.0 %Proposed Solutions to Remedy Identified Technology Gaps, Inefficiencies, or Other Issues
Proposed solutions are not presented.
Proposed solutions are presented but are incomplete.
Proposed solutions are presented but are rendered at a perfunctory level.
Proposed solutions are clearly presented and thorough. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements but not as complete as expected. Information presented is from scholarly but dated sources.
Proposed solutions are clearly presented and thorough. Discussion is insightful, forward-thinking, and detailed. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
10.0 %Conclusion
A conclusion is not presented.
A conclusion is presented but is incomplete.
A conclusion is presented but is rendered at a perfunctory level.
A conclusion is clearly presented and thorough. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements but not as complete as expected. Information presented is from scholarly but dated sources.
A conclusion is clearly presented and thorough. Discussion is insightful, forward-thinking, and detailed. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
