2 to 3 page analysis paper
2 to 3 page analysis paper
The Assignment (2–3 pages) APA Writing Style Please Cite all references!!!
ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW
Provide an analysis of the ethical and legal foundations of the health care policy issue you selected(the healthcare policy, ensuring all have access to healthcare), Howard Mosby. Use ethics terms, theories and apply what you have studied in prior weeks. Explain what the ethical issue(s) are, and present the pro and con ethical positions surrounding the health care policy issue. Then, explain what the legal issue is, and present the pro and con legal positions surrounding the health care policy issue. Finally, apply your critical thinking and analysis skills by suggesting two recommendations to the policymaker and/or stakeholder that align with your own position on the ethical and legal issues. Use of supporting references is essential
Rubric Guide Detail
EXCELLENT GOOD FAIR POOR
Part 1: Ethical Analysis
27 (27%) – 30 (30%)
The analysis shows depth, breadth, and clarity in critical thinking when addressing the pros and cons related to the ethical foundations of the selected health care policy.
24 (24%) – 26 (26%)
The analysis fully addresses the pros and cons related to the ethical foundations of the selected health care policy.
21 (21%) – 23 (23%)
The analysis lacks depth or clarity of the pros and cons related to the ethical foundations of the selected health care policy.
0 (0%) – 20 (20%)
The analysis does not address ethical foundations of the selected health care policy, is inaccurate, missing, or is of poor quality.
Part 2: Legal Analysis
27 (27%) – 30 (30%)
The analysis shows depth, breadth, and clarity in critical thinking when addressing the pros and cons related to the legal foundations of the selected health care policy.
24 (24%) – 26 (26%)
The analysis fully addresses the pros and cons related to the legal foundations of the selected health care policy.
21 (21%) – 23 (23%)
The analysis lacks depth or clarity of the pros and cons related to the legal foundations of the selected health care policy.
0 (0%) – 20 (20%)
The analysis does not address the legal foundations of the selected health care policy, is inaccurate, missing, or is of poor quality.
Part 3: Recommendations
18 (18%) – 20 (20%)
The analysis shows depth, breadth, and clarity in critical thinking and problem solving in its explanation of the relevance of the policy to the organization and the impact on both the organization and stakeholders.
16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
The analysis fully addresses the key points in its explanation of the relevance of the policy to the organization and the impact on both the organization and stakeholders.
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
The analysis lacks depth or clarity in its explanation of the relevance of the policy to the organization and the impact on both the organization and stakeholders.
0 (0%) – 13 (13%)
The analysis does not address the relevance of the policy to the organization and the impact on both the organization and stakeholders, is inaccurate, missing, or is of poor quality.
Writing
18 (18%) – 20 (20%)
Analysis is well organized, uses scholarly tone, contains original writing and proper paraphrasing, follows APA style, contains very few or no writing and/or spelling errors, and is fully consistent with graduate-level writing style.
16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
Analysis is mostly consistent with graduate-level writing style and may have some spelling, APA, and writing errors.
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
Analysis is somewhat consistent with graduate-level writing style and may have some spelling, APA, and writing errors.
0 (0%) – 13 (13%)
Analysis is well below graduate-level writing style expectations for organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and writing, or shows heavy reliance on quoting.
Tags: healthcare apastyle
