Dersign a pilot program 4-6 pages
Dersign a pilot program 4-6 pages
For this Assignment, in 4-6 pages design a pilot program and evaluation to address community needs for your Final Project initiative proposal. In your Assignment, be sure to include the following items:
ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW
Description of your proposed program that you developed in Weeks 3 and 6
Description of your proposed pilot program
Describe a small scale program that will help to determine the feasibility of your final project
Describe how many participants, staff, volunteers, and organizations will be involved
Description of your proposed evaluation of the pilot program including a tool (Six Sigma, TQM, etc…) to improve the proposed piloted processes
You may also develop a survey, use focus groups, or interviews for the evaluation process
Description of what other health care organizations and/or nongovernmental organizations have done to address your initiative
Grading RUBRIC
EXCELLENT – above expectations GOOD – met expectations FAIR – below expectations POOR – significantly below expectations or missing
Proposed Program and Pilot Study
Explain proposed program and pilot study for project initiative
Points:
Points Range: 23 (23%) – 25 (25%)
The paper shows depth in critical thinking when addressing the proposed program and pilot study for the project initiative.
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 20 (20%) – 22 (22%)
The paper fully addresses the proposed program and pilot study for the project initiative.
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 17 (17%) – 19 (19%)
The paper lacks depth or clarity related to the proposed program and pilot study for the project initiative.
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 16 (16%)
The paper does not address the proposed program and pilot study for the project initiative, is inaccurate, missing, or is of poor quality.
Feedback:
Proposed Evaluation of Pilot Study
Explain the evaluation process of a proposed pilot study and the relevance of an evaluation tool to improve upon the proposed piloted processes
Points:
Points Range: 23 (23%) – 25 (25%)
The paper shows critical thinking and problem solving in its explanation of the evaluation process of a proposed pilot study and of the relevance of an evaluation tool to improve the proposed piloted processes.
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 20 (20%) – 22 (22%)
The paper fully addresses the evaluation process of a proposed pilot study and the relevance of an evaluation tool to improve the proposed piloted processes.
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 17 (17%) – 19 (19%)
The paper lacks depth or clarity related to the evaluation process of a proposed pilot study and the relevance of an evaluation tool to improve proposed piloted processes.
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 16 (16%)
The paper does not address the evaluation process of a proposed pilot study and the relevance of an evaluation tool to improve proposed piloted processes, is inaccurate, missing, or is of poor quality.
Feedback:
Healthcare Organization and/or NGO Involvement
Explain how other health care organizations or NGOs implemented the proposed pilot project initiative
Points:
Points Range: 23 (23%) – 25 (25%)
The paper shows critical thinking and problem solving in its explanation of how other health care organizations or NGOs have implemented the proposed pilot project initiative.
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 20 (20%) – 22 (22%)
The paper fully addresses how other health care organizations or NGOs have implemented the proposed pilot project initiative.
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 17 (17%) – 19 (19%)
The paper lacks depth or clarity related to how health care organizations or NGOs have implemented the proposed pilot project initiative.
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 16 (16%)
The paper does not address how health care organizations or NGOs have implemented the proposed pilot project initiative, is inaccurate, missing, or is of poor quality.
Feedback:
Writing
Points:
Points Range: 23 (23%) – 25 (25%)
Paper is well organized, uses scholarly tone, contains original writing and proper paraphrasing, follows APA style, contains very few or no writing and/or spelling errors, and is fully consistent with graduate level writing style.
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 20 (20%) – 22 (22%)
Paper is mostly consistent with graduate level writing style and may have some spelling, APA, and writing errors.
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 17 (17%) – 19 (19%)
Paper is somewhat consistent with graduate level writing style and may have some spelling, APA, and writing errors.
Feedback:
